Our mission: Find the world’s best economic ideas (Summer School World Tour)

protection for we the people. Today, the NPR network proudly upholds your

“first amendment rights with reporting accountable only to you. It's something we”

protect together. Join the people who power the NPR network by showing your support at plus.npr.org. This is Planet Money, from NPR. The world is filled with smart ideas that can help all of us live better lives. And at Planet Money, we haven't just talked about those ideas. We have followed the money around the world, crossing borders. Very nice to meet you.

From America, from America, from America. Squeezing into the economy section of airplanes. Are your knees? If the guy in front of me, where to put his seat back, let it be screwed. Braving the waves of the high seas. All of this, to meet the people trying to make it in the global economy, from CEOs to a drug dealer in the Netherlands.

This summer, pack a bag, because this time, you're coming along for the ride. Seven continents, eight weeks, one thousand insights. Welcome back, everyone, to Planet Money Summer School, world tour. The international economics degree that fills your passport and your soul on Robert Smith. This season on Summer School, we are spending our parents' money on a semester abroad.

We'll hang out in cafes, learn a few exotic swear words, and we'll study a bit. I mean, it is definitely not a vacation dad. Each Wednesday until Labor Day, we will jet to a different country and meet people like us, facing problems like

the ones we face. But coming up with solutions, we could never have dreamed of.

Then we'll have our very own guide to the country, teaches a few economic lessons we can carry back in our carry on. This season we'll hit China, South Korea, Nigeria, Norway, Argentina, and a few more surprises. But today we start as far away as you can get from Planet Money headquarters, New Zealand and Australia. Our guide today is as Aussie as they get.

Hello, I'm in the middle of breakfast. Avocado, touched with eggs. It's amazing. Justin Wolfers, Economics Professor at the University of Michigan, and the host of the new YouTube channel and podcast platypus economics. I guess as an Australian,

“Koala economics was already taken. The truth is, Robert, I was not ready for it.”

Koala-Fied to teach that one. Oh, no. When you spend a semester abroad, you have to learn to appreciate the local

humor, I guess. Okay, Justin, as our first country guide, you can answer the big question

for the entire series. Why spend time looking at how economics works in different countries? So the first thing that other countries have, I mean, apart from beautiful places with lovely people, is their laboratories. Their places where other countries are trying different policies, different approaches, and we get to watch how they play out. Which is interesting, right? The principles of economics are the same wherever we go for every person, every

community, but each country has different demographics, different leadership, different expectations. So who actually benefits from an economic exchange? Say a market. Can be a political choice.

Political and economic, which is markets do stuff. But ultimately, what a market does is all

about the rules of the game. Let me give you an analogy for an American audience. American football is a wonderful game. But if we got rid of the rules, it would be actually kind of a boring athletic spectacle. The rules of the game are what channel, enterprise, and skill, and energy, either into something beautiful or into a horrific massive, black's font, and with each other. So using that metaphor, I guess today we're looking at Australian

rules, economics, which is a cross between rugby, and John Maynard Keynes in short shorts.

“After our break, our Aussie guide will show us an innovative market for the most important”

substance on Earth. We'll tell you what it is after the break, and we'll hear from a New Zealand jazz musician who also happened to figure out the way that the US uses to fight inflation.

for Iran. Make a deal where the US will quote "finish the job." We're tracking what the escalating

tension means for energy prices. Plus, a critical Senate race upended as Democrat-Gram Plattener

faces sexual assault allegations. That's this week on up first. Listen, every morning on the MBR app or wherever you get your podcasts. Every episode of its been a minute, MBR is what's happening in culture podcasts. Starts by asking three questions. Who? How? Why now? If the culture is asking it, we're talking about it. At MBR, we stand for your right to be curious, and indulge your cultural curiosity.

Follow its been a minute wherever you get your podcasts, and we'll break down the zeitgeist topics that are filling your feed. The Planet Money Summer School Charter Jat has just touched down in New South Wales, Australia.

This is the location for our first case study, which is about water. The commodity that

keeps all of us alive. Professor Justin Wolfers is with us before we hear our case study, what question should our students keep in mind?

“Look, so here's the thing. Here's how water is currently allocated without markets.”

It rains. That's it. God decides. The weather, the pressure system. So there's no way the weather is deciding to put the water where it's needed most. So then the question is, if we want the water to go where it's needed most, how would we solve this problem that nature is naturally giving it to us in the weirdest freaking places? We will be back with Justin after the case study, which comes to us from a story on the planet

Money Indicator from back in 2021. I'm Stacey Banix Smith. And I'm Daryne Woods. And Stacey,

we are really digging into the economics of irrigation and droughts. So we wanted what can we learn here in the US from the driest inhabited continent on Earth and we thought Australia. Come on over, we'll show you what not to do. This is Australian farmer, Carly Marriott. She's wearing a white woolly jumper, of course. My husband and I, we run a sheep in cropping farm, we've got three little kids. And yeah, we spend most of our days either wrangling sheep

or children or a combination of the two. Carly's family have been able to farm in the Australian state of New South Wales for generations. Thanks to her, great grandfather actually, who was part of this massive project about a hundred years ago building huge irrigation lines drawn from Australia's biggest river, the Murray River. It was built around the same time as developments on the Colorado River in the US, which is kind of the equivalent. These are both

huge bodies of water that have dams and canals that keep farming going in what would otherwise be pretty drought-prone areas. And it works until the droughts got worse. Now, if there's not enough of something to go around, like water, a lot of economists will just say, put a price on it, right? Let the market decide where that water is best used. And that is what Australia has done. They have one of the most advanced water markets in the world, where anyone can buy and sell water.

Carly, Marriott, their sheep farmer, she can easily log onto a website on their phone.

“It's very exciting. So you just go into the water exchange, got it?”

And you say, yes, and here's temporary water for sale. In Australia, it's as easy to trade water as it is to use like an app like Venmo or Robin Hood. You could do it. I could do it. I could start trading new South Wales water rights. I'm sure you're a good journalist, but you'd make more money. You'd make far more money trading water. I got roasted. It's easy. The basic idea is this, though. The government sets aside water

that it reckons can be sustainably taken from the dams. It puts that water on the open market for the taking to the highest bidder. And the economic intuition behind this is that it allows trades to make everyone better off. Like say I have an apple orchard in the middle of a drought. And during you are a cotton farmer. I was born for this row. So if I don't get enough water for the year, my apple trees will die. And it will take me six years to grow them back. Of course,

I would be willing to pay a lot of money for that not to happen and to get a little extra water. And let's say, Darian, that you have some extra water that I would like to buy, please. That isn't intriguing of a Stacey. Okay. I'll look up water prices on the app. And I see water prices are very high. The value of cotton I could grow this year is less than that. And unlike those apple trees, if my cotton dies this year, that's okay. Like, no sweat. I can start

“again next season. So I think, well, this year, it might make sense to sell that water to you, Stacey.”

And I won't grow cotton for now. Thank you, Darian. Deal. The water has gone where it is

use has been analyzed by Neil Hughes and his team at the Australian Bureau of Agriculture and Resource Economics and Sciences. Neil says that allowing different regions to trade water has meant huge economic gains. For example, in the southern basin region, where much of the country's farmland is, benefits are about 12% of the value of water rights, which is about $170 million a year.

Basically, they're model that water trading allowed an additional $117 million worth of stuff that

could be grown. So you could think about that as like 12% more produce and meat and wool with the same amount of water. And Neil says that those benefits are even greater in the dry years when getting water to its most-valued use matters the most. So these are all the benefits,

“but it has not been all hugs and rainbows. The way it's actually happened, right?”

Is that fair to say? Yeah, I mean, that's right. So in 2019, there was a lot of bad press emerging around water markets. And a lot of that was because water prices were extremely high. Kelly Marriott, the farmer, remembers this price spike well. She was thinking at the time, she might grow some sheep feed over the summer, so she'd logged into the website, and there it was.

From $100 a mega-later to $1,000 a mega-later. And we just felt like, yeah, the

rugby been pulled out from under our fate. And Carly started digging in to how the water market worked. And she was particularly frustrated that she was being offered really expensive water from people who were not even farmers themselves. This is the major difference between the US and Australia. Yes, the US has water markets, but they are generally tied to land. But in Australia, you do not

“need to own land to trade water. And when, say, each month, when water first comes onto the website,”

within an instant, you know, whatever the water availability becomes, these investors can swoop in and just buy up every possible megalator and just hold it. Carly and her family got really riled up. They felt like these people were water flippers. So they helped organize a convoy to Australia's capital city of Canberra. We dragged our kids five hours in the middle of summer to protest. And we actually stormed like, not America style, but we stormed to the front of Parliament.

Right. And we were we were shouting out. Like we were shouting the name of the water minister. And my three year old, she had the megafone. And she was into him. She had it up. And you just think, is this what we've become? Like we were just flat out, you know, growing crops and chasing sheep. And here we are, you know, demanding

“to be heard and seen by the nation. This economic theory, the idea of just letting the markets”

decide, it was colliding with reality. Stories like Carly's kickstarted the government into commissioning a massive review of the water market. And you'll use the economist from earlier, he was very positive about the whole system. He said that having those outside investors was a good thing for the proper functioning of the market. It meant that those trades of water were likely to actually happen. If there aren't that many people using the water trading website, then farmers might just hold on

to water that they don't need. But that view is by no means the consensus in water policy circles. In fact, Carly's concern that outsider investors are totally distorting the market is part of that debate. But putting aside that controversy, you know, coming out of that big report, it has basically three main lessons for water markets. Lesson number one is regulation. Water markets are serious markets. And according to the report, regulation should be just as vigilant

as you would have in other industries like finance. The same way that you might have rules around conflicts of interest or insider trading, you'd also buy that logic, need those rules in the water market. And lesson number two, coming out of that report, make sure the rules reflect a rapidly changing climate. And finally, lesson number three, share information widely. At the moment, the institutional investors can be at an advantage with forecasts, models, and really fast internet

connections. If that information is better shared, there might be less of a sense of grievance

from farmers working from a slow internet connection, who never signed up to be rapid

day traders of water. If you tried to beat them at their own game, sitting at the computer right on that dot of the hour. We got better things today. We grow grass when we can. We feed them grain when we can. We destock when it's not viable. And we no longer have that security that our dads and grandfather's head a couple of generations ago. That indicator episode from Stacey Vanix Smith and Durian Woods in 2021. Of course, we also have a long man who loves his markets,

water, and otherwise, Professor Justin Wolfer's Hey Justin. Hey, Robert. So let's go back to very basic question. What would happen in Australia if everyone just used the water that they needed?

make the decision about what they need and pass on the water to someone else if they don't need it. Hey, look, that sounds lovely. What a great idea. In a world in which we had more than a

quarter, that would work. The problem is one of scarcity, which is if the bloke upstream from me

uses the water he needs, there's less water left for me. And so if you don't have a market, that bloke's thinking, "Well, this water's got no value to me, so I may as well use it all." So the bloke is upstream. He's not only watering his crops. He's having two or three showers, and he just bought a cold plunger as well. In previous summer schools, we have gone over the

“economic term for this, which is tragedy of the commons. You should check your note students.”

And Australia's chosen to tackle this problem with a sort of classic solution, a market. So Justin, what is it about markets that can help combat scarcity? Right. So the question here is, what does a market do? Deep question. And what I tell my economics, one-on-one students is markets reallocate resources to their best possible uses. You've got a barrel of water. Who should get it?

Well, I can offer you money. The bloke next to me can offer you money. Presumably how much money I offer for it is in proportion to how valuable I would find it for helping my shape or my crops. And so, therefore, if you've got water that's not very valuable to you, when it's very valuable to me, then by allowing me to buy it from you, we are reallocating that resource to a better use. But as we heard from the story, there were concerns about the fact that

“once you have a centralized market like this, then anyone can walk in and trade water,”

even if they're not farmers. Even if they're not in Australia, you can be part of this market. Right. Is that a good thing? Does that help? So this is one of those things that feels bad in your bones, but I want you to get past your bones. Okay. So let's say there's some bloke in New York who's got a fancy pinstripe suit and drives a Maserati and he's in this market. You start to feel really bad about it, right? Like,

that guy's a jerk, he doesn't want good things for the world. There are times and ways and places where actually adding speculators to markets actually makes them more efficient. Because what's that guy trying to do? They're trying to buy when the price is low and they're trying to sell when the price is high. So at a time when there's not much demand, they're a little bit more demand. And at a time when there's not much supply, they're adding a little bit more supply.

That's a story in which speculators help. Now I want to be clear, by the way, I can also tell you stories in which they don't help. The part where it doesn't work is if this guy goes from driving

“a Maserati to driving two Maserati's. Where did he get the money for the second Maserati from?”

Excellent question. I assume the money comes at some point from the farmers. And maybe this is how a healthy amount of speculation can turn into a speculative bubble.

At a certain point, economists always argue this, prices can become divorce from reality and

everyone's trying to buy or sell based on who might come into the market. The greater fool theory is prices go up. It didn't seem to happen in the Australian water market, but it does happen. It happened with the real estate bubble in America in 2006. That's a story. If a house speculators actually make the markets function less will. So this is the thing about markets. They usually increase efficiency.

But there are people who make money and there are people who lose money. There are winners and losers in a market. This one of the deepest lessons in all of economics. Economic efficiency is saying the size of the pie got bigger. It's not promising your slice got bigger. Economists defend efficiency by saying, "Well, look, when there's a big a pie, there exists a way of slicing it."

So everyone's better off. But when it comes time to actually slice the pie, we never get

rounded doing that. We actually talked a lot about that in last year's summer school about government and government policy. Just that if you don't mind, I'm going to just throw a little assignment in here for our listeners and home. What is the scarce resource in your neighborhood or your state or your country? Mine is picnic tables in Prospect Park, New York, I live and possible to get. What is your scarce resource and could a market be designed to help? Could you make that market

more efficient? Could you grow the pie and slice it so that everyone gets more of that scarce thing? Let us know. Think about that as we take our break and when we return, we will visit the islands of the Kiwis and Hobbits and economists who figure out a clever way to fix one of the most fixing problems we face. On Consider This, NPR's afternoon news podcast, we cover everything from politics to the

economy to the world. But every story starts with a question. And NPR, we stand for your right

Follow Consider This, wherever you get your podcasts.

“This week on Shortwave, could your next ride to the airport be in a flying taxi?”

So you open up your Uber app and you've got Uber X and Uber Pet and now they'll be Uber Air. That reality may be only a few years away. But how is this futuristic travel possible? Find out on Shortwave and PR Science podcast. Listen on the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts. Hi, it's Terry Gross, host of Fresh Air. Hey, take a break from the 24-hour news cycle with us and listen to long-form interviews with your favorite authors, actors, filmmakers,

comedians, and musicians, the people making the art that nourishes us and speaks to our times. So listen to the fresh air podcast from NPR and WHYY. Are we doomed, helps you understand humanity's biggest threats? Time to change pandemics into their weapons. Stop still hits planets. He said we stand divided we fall. How worried should you actually beat? And what can we do? I'm Ben Bradford,

join me for all we do. Harvey and PR Network. Listen now wherever you get your podcasts. It is just a short hop on the Summer School jet from Australia to Auckland, New Zealand. And our next case study is about an economic concept that strikes fear and hatred into people around the world. The concept is inflation, prices going up, people hate it. Economists in just about every country of the world worry about how to control inflation. And it turns out the best tool for

that comes from New Zealand. Justin Wolfers, our professor, what should we think about as we listen to this next case study? So there's a really economic theory that just turns out to be wildly

“powerful, which is the perception can create reality. Here's the thing, if I believe that inflation”

is going to be low, I'm going to walk into my shop and I'm not going to raise my prices by very much. If I think inflation is going to be high, then I raise my prices and you raise your prices. And so the perception that inflation would be high creates the reality that inflation will be high. I know you're an economist, but when you talk about it this way, it sounds a little bit like magic and mass delusion. It is magic, but we call it multiple equilibria. No, no, no, no,

we cannot spoil it yet. We will define multiple equilibria after our second case study. It was hosted by Karen Duffin and Sarah Gonzalez in 2018. There's this number. It's probably the

most important number in the world. This number determines how many people in the U.S. have a job.

It has the power to wipe out our savings accounts. This delicate, fussy little number is the inflation rate, a bunch of what the Federal Reserve does all day is trying to get this number just right. And for the longest time, the Fed didn't want us to know what number they were targeting. But on January 25th, 2012, the then-fed chair Ben Bernanke told us. The committee judges said inflation at the rate of 2%. Ben Bernanke said the Fed had an explicit goal of keeping

this powerful number at 2%. This was a huge shift in American economics. But what we didn't know at the time was that this big bombshell announcement was because one guy in New Zealand decades earlier had proven that sharing your economic secrets is a good thing. His name is Arthur Grimes. Arthur completely reimagined the role of central bankers. Change the way whole countries keep

“their economies stable. He is one of the most important economists in the world.”

How do you think New Zealanders view you? They probably never hear to me. That's fun.

Are there used to be the chief economist at New Zealand Central Bank? He is a current professor of well-being and he's a jazz musician, a saxophone player. Tenna saxophone. Yeah, and actually I've got a duo called duopoly. You'd like that isn't a economist. The other guy's got a PhD in the economics tool. So what else would we call it? For most of Arthur's life, New Zealand had massive inflation, which meant prices were going up and everyone's money was losing value. This can happen

when there's too much money floating around an economy and everyone tries to spend it on not enough stuff. And the government had tried everything to lower inflation for nearly two decades. There were carless days. Days the government didn't let you drive your car to try to stop gas prices from going up. There was a time the government banned businesses from raising prices for a year.

And finally they turned to Arthur. They say you're a smart economist. You go find a way to fix this.

Go see what other countries do. And around 1986, they sent Arthur on a trip around the world. When you're in a small country that's on the other side of the world from virtually everywhere,

Arthur meets with a bunch of smart people in the US, the UK, Germany, Canada. They all have

“different methods for controlling inflation. Some central banks have a monetary supply”

target, which just means they're capping how much money is printed every year. Others have an employment target like what's the perfect amount of people with jobs for the healthiest economy. And some have an interest rate target. They're trying to pin down what's the right interest rate for loans. But all these targets were aimed at keeping inflation low. So Arthur thinks, why not just cut to the chase? It's the ultimate goal, which is inflation, and became inflation

targeting. Inflation targeting set an ideal level of inflation and drive the economy toward that. It took the central bank three years to develop this whole new system. But people had talked about inflation targeting before, right? No, not at all. No, not at all. No, no, no, no. It was only after the after New Zealand had done it, that that term was actually invented. You invented inflation targeting? There was no such thing as inflation targeting at the time. So the government says,

okay, central bank give us a number, so we can hold you accountable. Inflation is at 9% right now, what should we shoot for? Arthur says, I'm not going to give you a number, I will give you a range. 0 to 2 by 92. 0 to 2 by 92. Okay, sounds good, doesn't it? 0 to 2% inflation by 1992. This was the target. Here's the thinking behind this, aside from it being catchy. If you have 0% inflation,

that is true absolute price stability, the price of carrots, sugar, your rent, it never changes.

If you have 1% inflation, that means that the price of carrots goes up by 1%. But you're not skipping meals over this. You're just by turnips instead of carrots. Now, 1% inflation doesn't affect your well-being. So economists in New Zealand consider 1% inflation, kind of like neutral inflation. And then Arthur thinks we need some wiggle room. And so he says,

“let's give ourselves plus or minus 1%. So that's how they got 0 to 2. But they knew that”

reaching this target would be much easier said than done. None of us in our lifetimes almost had experience. 2% inflation. We'd all been brought up with double digit inflation. You know, it was considered extremely difficult to get 2%. New Zealand was going to dramatically force inflation down from 9% to under 2%. And having low inflation, like 2%, that's good. But the process of bringing it down, that hurts people. It is a painful process. And if they were going to meet

their target, they needed someone who could say, I don't care what happens to people. We're doing this. And we're not looking back. They chose a guy appropriately named Don Brash. Yep. Don here. This is Don Brash. I had to portray myself as someone who didn't give a fig. You had to present yourself as someone who didn't give a fig? Yeah, this is what I said. Yeah, this is probably an American expression, which is more more vulgar than you want to include. Don's job was to force

the inflation rate down. He did it by restricting how much money regular banks had in their vaults, which affects how much money everyone has. That was the easy part. He literally just said to snap to make it happen. But that easy thing would cause a huge spike in unemployment. At the time, inflation was really high. So people needed high wage increases just to break even. And Don is telling people those wage increases you need. They're going to make unemployment

last longer. But you can help shorten this pain if you just believe me. Have a little faith.

Start acting like inflation is already at 2%. And we will get to 2% much faster. He was basically

New Zealand smoky the bear. Only you can prevent long-term unemployment. So you're going around New Zealand telling workers. Listen, I know that inflation is almost 6% right now. But trust me, I'm going to bring it down. So just don't ask for a 6% wage increase in your salary.

“That's what you're doing. That's roughly what I'm doing. And then you're also going to”

businesses and saying business is we know the inflation rate is almost 6%. But we're going to bring it down so just don't charge more for your goods. That's right. That's the right. But nobody believes him. Employees keep asking for high raises, even though technically they don't need them anymore. And companies are continuing to give them because the employees are demanding them. And so companies now cannot afford to pay everyone at such high rates. So they lay people off

and then they lay more people off. Unemployment goes up past 11%. One in nine people who wanted to work couldn't. Well, it didn't look good at all. And I make no apology for that. It looked

you'd have to be an awful miserable son, so not to care. Don was supposed to get inflation between zero and two by 1992. And sure enough, we achieved it. Not only by 92, we actually achieved it by 91, which was a little earlier than planned. And there were people who said, look, by getting there early, you have subjected the real economy to more pressure than you needed to

“do. And there was some truth on that. How did people feel about you in New Zealand?”

Well, it very, greatly, at depending on you were talking to. No, people hated him. Even though inflation went down, unemployment was still high. It stayed high for years. But he did lower inflation in this new way that no one ever had before. And yes, there were still problems. But economists understood the logic behind inflation targeting. And the world's biggest economies, they start following in this tiny country's footsteps. They announced inflation targets of their own.

Canada first, the UK, then Australia. They all chose different ranges. And they all told their

citizens just like done did. New Zealand, their original target was zero to two, and they quickly raised it to zero to three. And now the target is one to three percent. But remember, Arthur Grimes, the jazz musician Econ PhD who invented inflation targeting, he likes the original two percent target. No, I like under two percent. That's where we started after all. Yeah. This is Arthur's jazz duo, planet money listeners, do wobbly.

He wants inflation rates just the way they are. That was the mellow tones of Sarah Gonzalez and Karen Duffin here on planet money summer school after dark.

The inflation rate right now in the United States is 4.2 percent, 4.2 percent. Yes, that is double

what the target is. Where's Dawn Brash when you need him? Our Aussia economist is back after the break to reveal the secrets of the New Zealand inflation magic trick. You know, every day on up first NPR's Golden Globe nominated morning news podcast,

“we bring you three essential stories. At the heart of each story, our questions. What really happened?”

What really mattered? What happens next? At NPR, we stand for your right to be curious and to follow the facts. Follow up first wherever you get your podcasts and start your day knowing what matters and why. All right, everyone. Eyes up, phones, put away. Our economist Justin Wolfers is back at the Blackboard for his final lesson. Just did you said before the case study that perception can create reality and then the case study showed it actually working in New Zealand and in other

countries around the globe, how exactly does the magic trick work? Great, let me answer and completely uninterruptible way. Okay, the magic is multiple equilibrium. Just say that at your next in a party, but let me rewind and explain what I mean. Equilibrium is just stuff that might

“happen and multiple is many things might happen. So what are the different things that might happen?”

Let me tell you a story about a virtual cycle. If Dawn Brash has convinced me that inflation is going to be very low next year, then I'm going to think to myself, well, the cost of my inputs isn't going to rise much and my competitors aren't going to raise their prices much. So I probably shouldn't raise my prices much either. No, I'd be a jerk. Not just a jerk. I'd lose a lot of money. Okay, and Robert, you're going to go through the same process and you're not going to raise your prices

very much either. And because we're talking about the New Zealand economy, having two suppliers,

that's basically the whole economy. There's a little Aussie jack there. So what we get there is

the expectation of low inflation creates the reality of low inflation. That's a virtual cycle. Magic, let me tell you something terrible. What used to happen in New Zealand is people thought inflation next year would be high. I thought that my competitors would raise their prices. So therefore I thought the best move for me, not to be a jerk, not to be a nice guy, to make profits, would be also to raise my prices in lockstep. The expectation of higher prices and their

full higher inflation created the reality of high prices and higher inflation. That's a vicious cycle. That's the thing about multiple equilibria. It just means many things could happen.

Here, if we're going to get people to believe one of them is going to happen. Let's get them to

believe in the virtual cycle. How you guess what everyone else is going to the virtual cycle? You'd be a goose not to join us, and that's the miracle of how you can reduce inflation without having to have a recession. But in order to get this miracle, you need at least two things.

“You need credibility. When the phone rings, you need to trust the person on the other end of the”

line. And you need transparency, which is everyone needs to know this credible information. Yeah, you're a really good economist. I should run a small country, central bank. But this is actually a whole lot of rhetoric. Ben Benank, he was really being on the TV talk for transparency, transparency, transparency. And you might have thought that was some sort of good government, pro-democratic sort of a thing. But you know what economists

better than that? It's that we think it's effective. Just in this season, on planet mining summer school, we are going to ask all of our guest economists for one idea that we can take from our featured country that would improve life here in the United States. New Zealand, thank you, obviously gave us the 2% inflation target, they're covered. But what trick should we adopt from Australia? In Australia, our elections are held on a Saturday. So the buscon influence with

the event or not. By the way, they're always held the local school will hold a barbecue,

so you can get what we call a democracy sausage. So you're doing your bit and you're also having a good feed. A literal sausage, you can buy it. A delicious sausage on a piece of white bread with tomato sauce, which Americans call ketchup and onions, and it nourishes the soil as well as the democracy. And I believe in my shoes, in my teeth, in every part of me, that Australia, is one of the world's more perfect democracies. And I say this not as a democratic theorist,

“but as an economist who believes that that's what gives us the ability to respond cohesively,”

clearly, quickly to the global financial crisis, to the next pandemic, to the rise of inequality in all of the sorts of problems that be devilish. And I guess the sausage is just a delicious bonus.

Speaking of bonuses, we do offer a diploma at the end of this semester of International Economics,

but our students will have to pass an online test. Just to help them study, let's go over some of the vocabulary words we have featured today. The most basic one should be easy. What is a market? A gathering of buyers and sellers. Very good. Okay, I'm going to give you a harder one to pull off. Multiple equilibria. Do it in 20 seconds. Love this. I'll give you 10 seconds back at the end. Equilibrium is just something that could happen. Multiple is many of them.

Many different things could happen. Well, it sounds simple when you say it that way. But it's a blindingly important insight because if many different things could happen, then economic policy can move as from the bad one to the good one. In the case study, we saw the importance of transparency, the central bank telling everyone what they were going to do. And even more important was credibility. What is your definition of credibility? Yes, so unfortunately, you're talking to

someone who has none. But a good central bank has credibility, which is when they say something, you believe them. So, it's the ability to move to a world in which words matter. Justin Wolfler's professor at the University of Michigan and the creator of Platypus Economics, which has some really fun videos that you find in my YouTube, Platypus listeners will love them. Thanks, Justin. Make great joy, night.

“So, if you like summer school, may I recommend the planet money book? Oh, have we mentioned that before?”

Uh, here's a specific idea. Chapter 18 is called "Why is my money worth less every year?" Excellent question. And also while you're on these long flights for summer school, how about the planet money audiobook? It's the name one of the best audiobooks of 2026 so far according to Spotify, so we're really proud of how it turned out. You can check it out on Spotify, or wherever else you get your audiobooks. Summer school is produced by Sophia police a car,

and edited by Alex Goldmark. It's fact checked by CROS. The show is engineered by only Huang with help from Robert Rodriguez. I'm Robert Smith. When I'm not summer schooling, I'm also the host of the new podcast "Business History" a show about the history of business. This is NPR. Thanks for listening. This is the final boarding call for any remaining passengers who are getting on the planet money flight

to Shanghai, China. Please proceed to the gate right away. It's a long flight so bring some snacks. We'll be taking off next Wednesday. Hi, it's Terry Gross, host of fresh air. Hey, take a break from the 24-hour new cycle with us

comedians, and musicians, the people making the art that nourishes us and speaks to our times.

So listen to the fresh air podcast from NPR and WHYY.

Every story from shortwave and pure science podcasts starts with a question.

“Like, why do we have nightmares? How does AI affect my energy bill?”

At NPR, we are here for your right to be curious about the world around you.

Follow shortwave wherever you get your podcasts because the more you ask, the more interesting the world gets.