JB Pritzker on the Fight Over AI, Housing, and Taxes

Hey, I'm doing it right now, but home projects I second-guess everything is that noise

“normal, is that water damage, and who should I even call?”

That's where some tech comes in, upload a photo or voice note, and their AI powered search helps diagnose the issue and match you with the right top rated local pro. Instead of second-guessing or searching for hours, you get clarity, and can hire the right pro with confidence. For your next home project, try thumb-tack.

They know homes. Higher the right pro today. Support for the show comes from Odo. Running a business is hard enough, so why make it harder, with it doesn't different

apps that don't talk to each other.

Introducing Odo. It's the only business software you'll ever need. It's an all-in-one fully integrated platform that makes your work easier. It's CRM, accounting, inventory, e-commerce, and more. And the best part, Odo replaces multiple expensive platforms for a fraction of the cost.

That's why over thousands of businesses have made the switch. So why not you? Try Odo for free at Odo.com, that's OdoO.com. Cheating on your partner is a huge breach of trust. All of the pain and the guilt and the reality of what was happening hit me just like a

title way of all at once. Why do people cheat? And why does it make us so mad even when we're not the ones that's happening too? That's this week on Explained It To Me. New episodes, Sundays, wherever you get your podcasts.

“Today's number $400,000, that's how much you have to pay for the original Playboy mansion”

in Chicago. Head? What's more disturbing? What was more disturbing for me than finding a stack of playboys in my father's basement? What's that?

Realizing one of them was still breathing. Hello Chicago! All right, that wouldn't work. Go on a dick joke. This is an old one.

It's my favorite. Speaking of sons, where he's at that age, right time for the sex talk. So I went into his room with a banana and a condom.

“I can't believe we have the governor here anyway.”

And he goes, "What's the banana for?" I can't get hard on an empty stomach. We are here in Illinois, where some of the nation's biggest debates are playing out at the state level. The AI boom, for example, has created a lot of opportunity, but also a lot of resentment,

particularly towards data centers, many of which are being built right here in Illinois. At the same time, Illinoisans are concerned about social media and its impacts on mental health, as well as the state's housing shortage, which has led to higher prices, much like what we've seen across the rest of America. Few leaders sit closer to these issues than our next guest, who has spent the past several

years guiding the state through them.

Since he was first elected in 2018, he passed several historic bills, such as raising

the minimum wage. We have big fans of that, and guaranteeing paid leave for every worker in Illinois. Before, yes, before politics, he helped create more than 14,000 jobs through his non-profit work, and today he is emerging as one of the most prominent voices in the Democratic party.

So without further ado, ladies and gentlemen, please welcome your governor, JB Pritzker. Well, it's great to have you here. Thank you so much for joining us. We want to get right into it. I would love to start with a question about the Illinois State budget, which was literally

just approved last night. Is that right? About 430 in the morning. Yeah, about 30 in the morning. So he's had his rest.

He's feeling good.

at that budget.

The first was a social media tax.

Illinois is going to tax social media platforms, 50 cents per user per month. And the second thing we found interesting was a prediction market's tax. Prediction market's operators will be taxed, 50% on their earnings from residents. We can get into the budget itself, but I just wanted to get your views on those two taxes.

“Why did you pursue them and how will this all play out?”

So to be clear, this is not a tax on people who are using social media. This is literally on the platforms. As many of you know, the social media companies are taking real advantage. Their algorithms are taking advantage of our kids in particular. We've had significant mental health challenges across the country as a result of the work

that they do at these social media companies. And not to mention the effects on all of us. And so we decided that they should have to pay for some of the effects that they're having on our children. And so we devise this social media platform fee.

And again, you talked about how it gets applied, but it's about $200 million.

It's not enough, frankly, to cover the mental health needs that we need to pay for in the state. But it's a beginning of them paying what I think is their fair share. Remember, they're making a whole big bunch of money on people in the state of Illinois. And yet we get zero benefit in all the negatives.

The degradation or education system, a degradation of mental health. So we want to deal with it. That's one of the ways. We also passed a child social media safety act to make sure that parents have the ability to control the devices of minors to limit the number of hours they have access to social

media if they want to. That's up to parents to make that decision. But we wanted to have the choice anyway.

It's great to see that this issue is finally being taken seriously.

“I think I feel like we've talked a lot about it on the podcast.”

And there seems to be almost no action, at least from federal government on these issues, it's particularly around big tech. I mean, does this set the stage for something else to come like what's next in terms of regulating social media and addressing these problems? Well, we've got to, I think, keep our eyes in ears open.

I mean, as you know, the world has changed technology is moving faster and faster. AI is upon us. And I think it's sort of slapping people in the face pretty fast. You know, we're going to see there's no doubt and effect on the economy as a result of AI.

We want to be able to deal with that. We need in fact passed an AI safety bill to make sure that we're monitoring the AI companies ability to stop the AI when it is literally a danger to the public. So, having to report to the state about that, having systems for turning it off in certain circumstances within a very short period of time, that's an example of us dealing with

then. And then you talked about calcium and polymarket. That's a situation.

“I think many of you have seen that there are a lot of very manipulated transactions”

that are happening on these betting markets. And there are two things going on that I find kind of reprehensible. One of them is the manipulated transactions. So, someone who's betting on an issue that they know what the outcome will be or have a significant impact on what the outcome will be, that's insider trading.

I mean, and the federal government has decided through the CFTC, they're going to do nothing about this. So we've got to do it at the state level. So that's one thing. I think the other is that they're taking bets on outcomes of games, which is fine, except that we have a sports book law in the state of Illinois where you've

got to get a license to do that in the state. But under the CFTC, you don't need a license of your calcium or polymarket. So what are they doing? They're literally taking transactions away from what otherwise would be a regulated market and putting it into an unregulated market.

So those are both areas where we've got to keep our eyes open and make sure that we're dealing with it. But standing up for the people of Illinois, making sure that we're doing what clearly Donald Trump and the Republican Congress are unwilling to do. That's something that I've been focused on for several years, and I'm going to keep

focused on it. So you're essentially, in many ways, the CEO of a company that has a product. And states offer certain value, services, and a cost, the taxes. Illinois is one of five states that's had net negative outflow of its population. Not anymore, literally last three years.

We've had increased population, last three years, last three years, last three years, and

Look, every year as you know, they do a survey, the American community survey, to determine roughly what the populations are of different states. But it's a survey, right? The census happens once every 10 years where they actually count each person. Someone comes to your door, there's an ability to count each person.

They counted everybody in Illinois after 10 years of saying we lost population, and said, oh, it turns out Illinois didn't lose population. And indeed, after they counted it, they went and recalculate as they do to make sure that they get it right in all the states. And Illinois was one of the states where they realized they didn't get it right.

And they added 250,000 to our number, which means we now have over 13 million people in

the state of Illinois. So the American community survey, there's clearly something wrong with it, because every year from 10, 2010 to 2020, they showed downward population. And then when they did a census, it turns out, no, we didn't have downward population. And then once again, 21, 22, they showed downward population.

And yet now, in the American community survey, in the last three years, they're showing us increasing population. So look, I'm not sure what to believe, but I know that if you count every single person, we're gaining population.

“So back to the notion of offering a product at a good price, right?”

What are the two or three things in the front of your mind? You're running for reelection. What, how do you make the product of Illinois a great value? What are the two or three things you want to see improve?

I mean, the reality is this is a high tax state, which means it needs to be worth it.

So what do you have planned, or what would you like to see happen to ensure this product, as you said, continues to get more customers coming into the coming into the state? Well, let me start with, when I got elected in 2019, I took office in 2019, and the state really had gone through a terrible period of time, in which we went without a budget for two years in a row, the only state ever to have that happen, by the way.

And $17 billion in unpaid bills, we had had 21 straight credit downgrades in the state. So just the management of the state was poor. And I heard it, by the way, I went to New York, and I met with the bond rating agencies, as well as bond investors, who really are judging the economy and the future of the state. And they were skeptical, because they had seen Illinois poorly governed for a lot of years.

I had a plan, and I implemented that plan, and we've had 10 credit upgrades. We've had eight straight balanced budgets just past the eighth one. Well, early this morning. And so that's part of it, right, better management of the state. The second thing is we had to grow the economy of the state, the history of Illinois is

that we grow at a less than half of the rate of growth of the entire United States. So we're just not growing at the rate that we, now remember, some of our largest industries in Illinois are agriculture, which doesn't grow at a very high rate, manufacturing, which doesn't grow at a very high rate. Those are two huge pieces of our economy in the state.

So when I came in, I had to look at, well, how do we increase the growth rate for the state? You've got to have industries that are growing at a much higher rate than agriculture and manufacturing.

“So that's what I've made investments in over the last seven years, seven and a half years.”

For example, we now have a quantum park. We are probably the number one state in the United States for quantum technology.

And that industry is growing at 20 to 25 percent per year.

Life sciences is growing at about 10 percent per year. We invested in bio-manufacturing that is a new industry that's growing again at 10 percent a year. And so when you go down the list of the things clean energy, by the way, also growing at about 8 to 9 percent a year.

So all of these things are things that are, you know, we've got to turn the crank faster in the state. If I'm making a case about the state on finances, I would say we're in much better shape than we were seven and a half years ago, and our economy is doing better than it was. We're about 1.2 and a half, 1.3 trillion dollars GDP and that makes us just FYI for the

people of Illinois some pride here that we would be in the G20 if we were an independent country. And I'll just add that that's a consideration, not just just kidding. But these days, you know, I just follow up, I do want to say, sir, I want to add just you talk to what's the pitch.

“The last part, and this is not an important particularly for young people, and if you”

want to grow your state and grow your economy, you want to focus on this, but it's true for everybody. We protect people's individual rights, no matter who you are, no matter who you love.

saw that.

We were under attack before Minnesota, before Minneapolis was we were like the testbed for

Donald Trump. They came here and frankly, everybody here knows, people came out with their whistles, people came out with their phones and videoed everything and posted it, people protested peacefully and push back and look what happened. They left.

And unfortunately, they tried again in Minneapolis with many more troops, essentially. And Minneapolis pushed back too, so I'm proud of the people of this country, and we're starting to see a real movement of push back, and I think we're winning. We'll be right back. Support for the show comes from Odo.

Running a business is hard enough, so why make it harder, with it doesn't different

apps that don't talk to each other? Introducing Odo, it's the only business software you'll ever need. It's an all-in-one fully integrated platform that makes your work easier. CRM, accounting, inventory, e-commerce, and more, and the best part, Odo replaces multiple expensive platforms for a fraction of the cost.

“That's why over thousands of businesses have made the switch, so why not you?”

Try Odo for free at Odo.com, that's OdoO.com. Café in a best form. With Kubo, we'll take a coffee at Knopfdruck for a few moments. Then with the new Kubo-1 capsule machine from Chibo, we'll start with a coffee from besonderen unbaughibiten, full-mondical aroma, dank innovative press brutality, and

over-sip-sint-sorten café for every smuck. Aléba premium café is already at 920 €, and decades now, the Kubo-capsil machine in diner Chibo-fiale and of Chibo-dee. Have we underestimated the damage Trump has done? It's easy, perhaps, to chuckle at a Donald Trump, there are times when he's sort of

"campy," I think there are things that he does, you know, is his little dance, and some of the other kinds of things to come across as a rascal, but I think we have to look under those things, at the real harm he is done to American institutions and the rule of law. I'm Preet Barara, and this week former U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade joins me to discuss

this administration's mob style governance and corruption. The episode is out now. Search and follow stay tuned with Preet, wherever you get your podcasts. We're back with Prophogy markets. To be blunt, I would argue that given your universities, the wealth here, that the city

punches out or below its weight class in terms of technology companies, in terms of actual unicorns, and given the importance of technology in some of the faster going economies,

“in your venture capitalists, what if anything, or if any programs do you think would inspire?”

My sense is, again, you may correct me, that a lot of kids interested in tech who come out of your finding universities had Easter West, that a lot of them don't stay. What if anything do you have planned to sort of, and you just talked about quantum, but to make quantum food have Chicago, occupy the place that commands in terms of technology? Sure.

You're right. So when I, many years ago, the business that was in, investing in technology companies, I was an entrepreneur myself, and I believe in the power of entrepreneurship. And so we had a real problem in Chicago in particular, but throughout the state, and the problem was that we have some of the greatest universities in the world.

University of Chicago, University of Illinois, Northwestern University, there is a long list of great universities here, those are just the headlines. And we have great technology that's coming out of laboratories in those universities. We are research institution heavy in the state, but what was happening was people were getting up and leaving.

They would, the famous thing that I really paid attention to was, in the early 90s, as you probably know, Mark Andrewson, and others really invented, not Al Gore, but they invented really the internet, at least made it useful.

The first graphic browser came out of the University of Illinois, but you know, YouTube is

from here PayPal actually originally came out of Illinois.

“So you go down the list of these companies and say, what happened to them?”

Well, they all got up and left. So when I think about that, I think it's the job of our government in part to create an environment in which those entrepreneurs want to stay in the state of Illinois. But if you're not paying attention to it, people will get up and leave. And that's why when I came into office and really weren't, nobody was talking about

That's why we made an initial major investment, 200 million dollars more than any other

state in not the quantum park, but in making sure that we were building up the research capabilities in the state of Illinois, you don't often hear that a state does that. But I wanted us to attract the best scientists, the best technologists. And so we did that in 2019 and oh, by the way, the federal government saw it and they gave us four of the 10 centers for quantum technology that they awarded these major federal grants

because we were willing to put our money up, they put their money up. And so we really won that battle, that was 2019 fast forward in the last couple of years.

“It was important for us because we were winning on that research front to turn it into”

practical application commercialization. So what did we do? We created the quantum park working with the University of Chicago University of Illinois runs that quantum park. It's on the South Side of Chicago on a piece of land that has been empty for 30 years that used to be a U.S. steel site.

It's a beautiful site on the lake front, but it had been abandoned, you know, had some

toxicity to the soil, it needed remediation, but it's an amazing place and the neighborhood

had really been left out and left behind. So we've now turned that into a major quantum park we've attracted IBM, Cyquantum, Inflaction, Dirac. I mean, we can go through a list.

“Some of these you haven't heard of because they're burgeoning new quantum companies.”

But the point is that we now have more than a billion dollars invested in that park. I'm not talking about us. I'm talking about private dollars coming in. We have DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, which has been responsible for so many of the technology advances that we've all seen, including Internet, including

GPS, et cetera. They have created a benchmarking facility at that quantum park. So this is all about making Illinois the next Silicon Valley for quantum, because that if you really want to improve the economy of the state, you make investments like that that have a long-term benefit.

We will see, in my view, literally tens of billions of dollars and ultimately, you know,

the economy for quantum is going to be a trillion dollars. We should get a massive portion of that, because we were early, because we made the investments, and we've attracted the right people. One, you know, see, mentioned quantum biotech life sciences, all these fascinating technologies, they didn't mention AI, and AI is, that is, you know, the multi-trillion dollar prize, but

as we are increasingly seeing, it is becoming increasingly unpopular in America. And here in Illinois, this is one of the highest numbers of data centers in the state, and increasingly what we're seeing is a lot of people have decided, we actually don't like data centers, we actually don't like AI, they are protesting against it. How is Governor, how do you think about AI, how do you adopt the technology such that

you can generate prosperity and productivity while at the same time recognize that a lot of people are not fans of this technology, they don't even want it here. Yeah, let me back up and just say, you know, there's a little bit of a difference between data centers that we were attracting several years ago, and now the AI data centers, these are like massive facilities, right? And I'm proud of the fact that Illinois, because

of our geography, because of the fact that we, I don't know if anybody knows here, that we have 80% of the United States fresh water is on the shores of or underneath or surrounding in our rivers, Illinois. I mean, 80% of the United States fresh water, right, including, of course, the Great Lakes, and it's 20% of the world's fresh water. Nobody ever took full advantage of the fact that, you know, that's a commodity that we also should be valuing

and protecting for the state of Illinois. So let's start with just a recognition of that and a recognition that we also have been a net energy exporter in the state, about 53% of all the electricity that gets created in the state of Illinois is nuclear, with the largest nuclear state in the country. Now, there were years ago when people were like, oh my God, that's a terrible thing. I think mostly today, people would say, we need more electricity,

how are we going to get it fast enough? And of course, we've expanded all the renewable

“energy sources that we can as fast as we can, but nuclear is the best way to get base load”

energy that we need. So, to your point, though, data centers are sucking a lot of the electricity and water. And it's not just Illinois data centers, there are data centers all of the country that are doing some particularly the AI, big AI data centers that are going up and, you know, you saw like in Pennsylvania, they're restarting through my island, just

thing to have done. What I've done here and I proposed it back in February is that we,

you know, we had just like we do in a lot of industries, we had tax credits available for people to build data centers. I do want to point out that data centers are really great job creators for the, in the construction side of things. But once they're built, they really don't employ a lot of people. What they do do is pay property taxes in the local area, which brings down property taxes for others. I am going through all this because what we now need

“to do is take a pause. And that's what I proposed back in February when I gave my state of”

the state speech. We should pause our data center tax credits. We're going to take an assessment

of where we are. And very importantly, we should force data centers to bring their own

electricity and make sure that they're paying their fair share if they're coming to the state of Illinois. We agree on that. I just want to ask you about housing. So you recently, how to propose a bill, bill called the build plan. And the idea was to bring down housing prices by essentially getting, giving the state the power to override these local zoning policies. If I'm getting that, getting that right. And the bill didn't pause. And I look at that to me,

that's a great plan to reduce the cost of housing in America. We've talked about this a lot. Econ 101, you need to increase the supply if you want to get prices down. It sounds like you tried to do that. And it didn't work. I didn't, it didn't pan out. What are your takeaways from build not going through? And what does the future of housing policy in America look like in a way that is actually effective? And it actually brings prices down. I'm glad you asked because, you know,

when I ran for office my slogan for my campaign was "Think Big." Now, some of that was because but it was also because we needed a big change in the state. And I talked about some of the challenges that we had. And I have not stopped thinking big or acting in a way that will change the direction of the state in a positive way. One of the things, of course, that we need in the state of Illinois. It's the biggest expense that everybody in this room and everybody in the state

“has, which is housing. And if you want to address affordability and that's sort of the buzzword of the”

day. But really, if you want to bring costs down for people, you've got to make it more affordable for people to buy a home or rent a home, rent an apartment, etc. So here's the other thing. We've balanced the budget every year. It's not an easy thing, especially in this moment when Donald

Trump has taken away $8 billion from the state of Illinois, $8 billion. Our total budget is $55

billion when you take $8 billion away. It's impossible to replace. So let's be clear. If we want to address this, we can't do it by just writing checks so that we can just create a bunch of housing and give it away. Yes, we need affordable housing for low-income people who otherwise can't afford housing. We absolutely have been investing in that. We're not going to stop doing that. But what we need now also is housing for working-class people, for working families, for middle-class people who can't

buy a home. I mean, now what's the average age? To buy a first-time home, 40 years old. It used to be 30. It's now 40 years old. People want to start a family, can't afford to buy a house and plant their family somewhere there's a good school and so on. So how do you do that? If you don't have a lot of money to build housing or just subsidize people buying housing, how do you go about that? Well, one way to do that is remove some of the barriers to make it less expensive to build homes

and make sure that you're providing just some basic down payment assistance for people in a world where interest rates are very high compared to where they were before. Anyway, they're six and a half percent roughly for a mortgage right now. And the average home in Illinois costs about $400,000 across, sorry, in the city of Chicago, about $400,000 across the state, it's about $320,000 to buy a home.

“People can't buy a home anymore. And so we want to make it a little easier and the only way to do that”

is let's remove the barriers. So what's an example of how you remove barriers? Well, one way to do that is make sure that in a neighborhood where, you know, over the years redlining, for example, has put a bunch of regulations in place that really haven't been removed and they haven't been called out for the fact that they were about redlining, have kept people from building like a tooth flat, a duplex where otherwise there was only a single family home allowed. What about if

you own a home and you have a garage and you'd like to put your parents in either getting older and they'd like them to be on your property, but they'd like their own home and you want to convert

And it may take you a couple of years to get permitted to do anything like that if it is allowed.

So what we're trying to do is just make it a little bit easier. We're not talking about building you know, 50 condos next to a, you know, single family home block. That's not what we're to and yet that is the misinformation that people who are opposed to this have been putting out. So look, it may take us, it clearly is going to take more than the session that we were just in to convince people, this is the right way to go. But we are making progress in this regard

and the right thing to do is add a few homes everywhere in the state. We need about 240,000 more homes in the state by 2030. We are probably of a shortage about 130,000 right now. So you can't

“do that quickly unless you do something significant, thinking big. And that's what the build plan is.”

We got about two pieces of it passed. They're about four that didn't get passed in this session.

But I've worked on things for a couple of years to get them done. We just band cell phones during the school day in classes. And that took us a couple of years. So sometimes you get to work on something more than just a few months. To what extent do you think states and cities should continue to subsidize billionaire families that own sports franchises? I'm sorry. I didn't hear anything before sports franchises. What did you ask? I'll phrase a question a different way. Bears question

mark. Who here's a Chicago Bears fan? Me too. And when the Bears shoot up and up, balancing the budget. Sorry. It's only your audience, by the way, where people are really thinking about that.

I really appreciate it. Although in the state of Illinois, balancing budgets, it's actually a

big deal, isn't it? So I look, I mean, I love the Chicago Bears and they showed up and spring

“field about a couple of years ago. And I think a couple of years trying to lobby the legislature”

and we're unsuccessful. And the reason is, you know, things have changed since many years ago when there was a stadium finance authority created the created soldier field and created what I would call Kamiski and it's rate now or something like that guaranteed rate field. Kamiski for the white socks. Years ago, it was very popular for politicians to build and pay for stadiums for sports teams. It's not very popular right now, especially in a moment when people aren't

able to get fed because snaps being taken away, Medicaid, and their health care is being taken away. And we have a lot of other priorities. I'm not suggesting that we don't love the Chicago Bears or that we don't want to help a business in the state. And that is a private business owned by a private family. We do. We want more business, more jobs. We want to help people come to or expand in the state. But honestly, in the priority of things in Springfield and things that

matter in the state, it wasn't the number one priority. So nevertheless, I thought it was important for us to put forward something that would help the Bears stay in the state. I think they want to stay in the state. But I also think that, you know, it's a team that has struggled, I think, to make investments. And so they're looking for others to help them make investments like this. What I'm unwilling to do is spend taxpayer money to build a stadium for a private business.

But in, but incentives, incentives like, for example, we do this for lots of companies. You need infrastructure. You need roads. You know, you need sewers. You need things when you're going to build a new factory or build a new headquarters. Those are all things that government is supposed to do. And so those are things that we talk to the Bears about doing and giving them the ability to build a privately owned stadium. That was something that we put a plan together for.

But, you know, look, it's not my job to go lobby for the Bears. They've got to go get the support for the for their staying in the state and for all the things that they want. And I think they were not all that successful at getting that done. I say all that with the desire that, you know, the Senate pass a bill that would allow them to stay in the state. The house did not pass it, because I think, frankly, you know, midnight was a deadline. Some of you may know the way the

“legislature works but you have to get super majorities after midnight on May 31st. So we call that”

May 32nd. They passed midnight. They weren't able to get it in the house and they didn't have a

summer. But the key thing for me is protect the taxpayers and make sure that we're helping a business

grow in the state. Stay with us. Right now, it's clear that Ukraine is much more confident, time the adults increase in Ukraine's side and there's no obvious reasons for them to negotiate the ceasefire and the near-term because the United States or somebody else wants it. I'm John Finer and I'm Jake Sullivan and we're the hosts of the Long Game, a weekly national

security podcast. This week, we discussed the war in Ukraine with Michael Kaufman,

one of the leading analysts of the conflict who recently returned from the front lines.

The episodes out now search for and follow the Long Game wherever you get your podcasts.

“We're back with Profty Markets. Should you decide to run for federal office? I think”

something that might be a liability is that when someone asks you a question, you're a thoughtful and you add code. Sorry about that. Thanks, context. So I'm going to help you out here and we're going to try and do social media tick-tockable answers. Okay. So I want to do two lightning rounds and want to be a policy lightning round and want to be more of a personal lightning round. Make sense, I'm going to talk about a policy and I just want to get a quick response. Wow.

This is what it's like. Imagine working for him. Yeah, I really don't. Yeah, it's pretty tough. Yeah, things are rough for you. He's like 14 years old. Anyways, a federally mandated $25 an hour minimum wage. I raised the minimum wage in the state of Illinois to $15 for eight thousand twenty five cents. I do think it's got to be a level playing field across the country. So we're going to raise the minimum wage, which we should do federal minimum wage

$7.25. I know you want a shorter answer. Federal minimum wage $7.25. You can't survive on that. So $25 seems like fair and reasonable if it's across the board.

“Lower Medicaid, eligibility, or Medicare excuse me, I think it was one two years. Basically,”

single payer, socialize national health. Well, you put a lot of words in there. We need about socialize, because socialize matters. Yeah, okay, okay, all right, that you're putting a perspective on it. What I would say is everybody should have a doctor. We should have universal health care in this country. And that there are several ways to do that single payer, Medicare, for all, or a system that has private and public, like a public option, for example, but it's

got to be a federal public option. We looked at it for the state to create a public option and couldn't figure out how to make it work fiscally for the state to do it. No state's been able to do that, but it could work nationally. Mandatory national service. I really do, yeah,

“I really do believe that everybody should do some service. And I think going forward when you think”

about the effects that AI is going to have on the economy, that people are going to have to learn what we've traditionally called vocational training, and we should just provide that training for everybody, and the opportunity to go in the military if that's a choice that people want to make, but some choices that people could make at age 18 when they're graduating, because I think in the end, AI is not going to replace things, I do not believe AI is going to replace a plumber,

and they're not going to replace people who construct buildings. So, I do think that having some kind of opportunity for people that, you know, it's just like you're required to go to school, this should be in that vein. Last one on the positive side. I'll turn it at a minimum tax on anyone

making sale of $10 million of 50%. Can I just amend that slightly to something that's gotten

very popular recently, which is the wealth tax, just because this is seems to be the direction

We've just seen a federal proposal. I mean, all the time of minimum taxes are also interesting,

but given wealth tax is so popular, what do you make of that? You may not know that I introduced the graduating, but we have a flat tax in the state of Illinois, I introduced a graduating of tax. It would lower taxes on 97% of people in Illinois and raised taxes on the top 3% in Illinois.

“We could not get that done back in 2019. I really believe that we've got to have a fairer”

tax system where the wealthy pay a much higher rate than people who are just working class. In fact, most people shouldn't have to pay a lot of tax. Indeed, there shouldn't be the same tax rate that is applied to someone like you, Scott, as compared to a nurse or someone who's working at McDonald's. So I'm sorry, I did you have something. Yeah, I mean, the wealth tax in particular, because this seems to be one of the issues that is going to divide people. Some would say that the wealth tax is going to fall,

maybe it would disincentivize investment, maybe it's to anti-business, like, where do you land on this,

ultimately? Like I said, I think the wealthy, and we've talked about a millionaires tax here

in the state of Illinois as an alternative to a graduating income tax. By the way, do you know who introduce the graduating income tax in the United States, Abraham Lincoln? And how does that work? If it's not federally mandated, because you just, everyone moves to Florida. It doesn't have to be a federal. How do you do that? I mean, aren't you just going to lose more and more? I mean, it's easy to help these work fair and demonize billionaires, but if you lose them,

you lose a lot of tax revenue now. I get it, but you know, we also have much better education system than Florida does. We have a much better health care system than Florida does. You know, it's going to get a great education in Florida, Governor. I get that the billionaires can, it's true. They can go anywhere. They can go to Monaco if they want to. But, but I'm suggesting to you that I want to live in a state where we protect people's rights, where we're making sure

that people have health care, we're making sure that people get a decent income. And that includes

“the right to organize and collectively bargain. And because if you want to deal with affordability,”

by the way, put more money in people's pockets, that's the best way to do it. But I also think that, you know, we're a state, look, I think there's a lot of pride in the people of Chicago and the people of the state of Illinois about our state. Yes, it's colder here than it is in Florida. There is not much I can do about that although slowly I was guys get slowly, but surely, oh, by the way, Florida's going to need fresh water just like everywhere else.

Yeah. So actually, you've seen, if you look at the projections going forward, people moving across the country, the projections are that people will move more and more toward the Midwest and not away from it because of the water problem. So even to very generously at the time, we're going to wrap up with the personal lightning round. Okay, guilty pleasure. Oh, well, you can see I've had a lot of guilty pleasures. Most of them have been food oriented, but I guess cheesecake.

Eli's cheesecake, I'm my dad. Living person that has the most impact on you. My wife has been a person who's no longer with us that's had the most impact on you. You're asking all the, you know, you're getting answers for me that you probably are uninterested in, but my mother, who was an activist for LGBTQ rights and for abortion rights. In the '60s and '70s, when it was hard, last piece of media, you've read of watch,

it's really moved you're impacted you. Oh, boy. You know, there's now I'm like consuming so much every day that I'm not sure that's really moved me. There's a story that I just read recently about a transgender woman who went missing. And in the course of that story, not only covered, you know, her family's journey trying to locate her or determine if she had been abducted and killed, which often has happened, unfortunately. But also it talked about the challenges that

transgender people have with, you know, the mental health challenges that are brought on by societies, the more is that people put, you know, the way people treat transgender people.

“So I don't know, you that, that moved me because I really believe that we ought to be protecting”

every single person is individual rights and respecting everybody. And I think that, unfortunately, is not the tone or tenor of the leadership of this country right now. And the result of that is that we're moving backward, not forward in protecting people.

Best advice you've ever received. My mother, once again, when she sent me off from my very first

job, official legal job, where I had a paycheck and paid to the paid into the union also.

to hotel business. And my family's in the hotel business. And I got, really? They may not know, you know, and it was actually the job, by the way, was picking up the laundry at a motel. And it's just like the dirty sheets, right? Picking up the dirty sheets and then loading them into the washing machine and then picking them out of the washing machine, throwing them into the dryer. So, you know, not a terrific job, but a great first job. My mother said to me as I was leaving

“the very first day, she said, "Now remember, you have to work twice as hard as the guy next”

to you because you did not earn this job." He did. And I will never forget that. I mean, as long

as I live and I have tried always to work as hard, harder, twice as hard as the people that I'm working next to because I'm frankly alienated in the lucky tub. Advice who would give to young men who are struggling. One thing is that your relationships really matter, that, you know, having personal human connection to people really matters. And I know that in this world, more and more, that's falling apart. People do not have personal connection.

So, one is to maintain your connection. I think it's harder and harder, especially in a world where and this is just a fact of life and a positive one where women are more financially independent than they have been ever before. And that should continue. But that doesn't mean that, you know, men can't be, you know, be protectors and providers and partners, you know, with women who are

“financially independent. And I think it's just that we are living with some old morays that have”

been foisted upon a new world still, right? And especially when you've got somebody who wants to, you know, who says you want to make America great again, as if it's like we gotta go back to the 1950s for America to be great. And so that's, you know, my advice is that. And I guess, you know, recognizing that you can't, you know, you really need your world aperture and view to be wider and not narrower. Stop, you know, spending all of your time on social media and spend a lot

of your time putting it aside and actually interacting with people. And we'll wrap up. We'll wrap up here where you felt your lowest moment where you were most sort of, I don't know, grieving or unhappy in your life. And when you look back on your life, what you think you'll point to is being the point in your life for your, the happiest and most fulfilled. Well, I'll give the latter one. I mean, I maybe it's too classic, but, but I mean,

literally the birth of my first child was probably the happiest moment I can imagine. I mean,

I, it's hard not to say that my wedding was important. But I'm not sure my wife will listen to the

“podcast. So, um, but it is true the birth of my first child. And then I think, I mean, there's no doubt.”

I lost my father when I was seven and my mother when I was 17. And between those two time, in that time period, my mother was in alcoholic. And there is, I'm not sure when I was seven if I fully understood the loss that I was experiencing. I mean, I understood it in the ten years after, but it included also the loss of my mother because essentially my brother and sister and I were taking

care of my mother for some of that time. She was an amazing person. And when she was sober,

she was the smartest person you'd ever meet. And as I said, she was an activist in years when that was really hard to do. So I just, I'd mention this the lowest moment is one of those two moments when I, in my father passed away when I was seven, my mother passed down at 17 that that moment, my mother passed away probably because I was more cognizant of maybe that I was more alone in the world or that I didn't have family mentors, let's say, any more except my brother and sister who,

you know, were closest, result. I don't want to end there. If you had a magic wand, if you had a magic wand and you would want one policy or one thing to change about America, what would that thing be? It has to be that that no one in this country should go without having the opportunity to have a great job and a good paying job. I mean, that to me, the dignity of work is so vitally important. That's not to suggest that people who are very vulnerable and don't have a job,

rather than shouldn't, you know, be people that we are caring for and making sure we're lifting

up. But I'm telling you, like, the idea that we're going to go into a world now, we're possibly

“we're not going to have enough jobs because of AI. I think we have to start thinking seriously right”

now because there is no time to waste about what does the world look like in the future because people need jobs. It can't be that we're just handing out profits to people as a result of what AI is happening, you know, maybe that's like one way to deal with it or I think a lot of the oligarchs that Donald Trump has, you know, spends his time with think that we shouldn't actually give any money to anyone and that they should be the only ones who make it. But even if you say,

let's distribute, you know, what the trillions that they're going to make from this, that's not the

“answer. It is the dignity of work that I think really matters to people and yes, people need to”

never go without enough to be able to provide the basic necessities and a little bit more because

no one can afford anymore and a working person can't afford to go to a Disney world, a working person can't afford to take their family on vacation anymore. That is not a world that like

“working to survive, that's not enough. And so we've got to have a world where we recognize”

the holistic benefit that it is to be human and what it is that we need to do to lift people up. People up, please join me in thanking the governor, the great state of Illinois,

J.B. Bradshaw. This episode is always with us by watching the video like and subscribe.

Thank you so much. Have a good night. [Music]