03-24-26 Part One - Idiots Leading Idiots

politics to social issues and news of the day, whether you're up late or you're just starting your day.

“Welcome to the show from the Relief Factor Studios.”

This is Red Eye Radio. All across America, we are Red Eye Radio. He is her crowding and I'm Gary McNamara. Again, stop making it so easy. You know, we have this practice of listen, we want the audience to know.

We should have some sad music playing here, some serious music. We work very hard.

We're always working, you know, big stories going on.

There's like going on and we're going to get to other stories, but you're right. We walk in and it's stuff that's just handed to us. You know, I guess some people get free catering or something and our benefit is the Democrats. You know, we walk in and go, okay, there we go. Now, when you're right, because we do work, I know both you and I pay an attention to the Supreme

Court ruling, not ruling, but the Supreme Court hearings yesterday, which got to be pretty funny. What's the definition of a day? Because, you know, whether male and balance should be able to be taken in later on that day and that argument, you know, is very easy.

So yeah, we do our research and everything else, but that's become normal. Because I've been doing it for half a set over half a century now.

I've always read, I've always been fascinated with politics, even though I didn't want

to be a talk show hostinitially, initially, excuse me, I always paid attention to it. And so even if I decided to retire tomorrow, which I am not, I would still be reading. And my fear is that if I ever retire that my mind's going to blow up, it's going to be like scanners, because it's going to be so much information and nowhere to put it out. But besides that, which is not work anymore, it's just so natural.

I've done it so many, you know, we're closing in.

“I think we're very close, well, excuse me, I'm very close to 10,000 shows in my life.”

Yeah. Oh. And I think, yeah, I believe we're both close to 45 to 50,000 hours of of doing this. Yeah. And that's on the air.

And if you look, well, you're doing much more research. So you probably, I would say we could be comfortable in saying you and I have done 100,000 hours of show prep in our life because we've probably done, you probably do twice as much. But the fact is, it's not work because you're so used to doing it. I mean, I wake up, I'll still be doing this if I ever retire.

Yeah. I wake up in the morning and so I grab the phone, phones right next to me, I grab the phone. And in three or four minutes, I have an idea of what the day is going to be like. And then it may change an hour from then. But I'm constantly, I can't go 20 minutes without looking at my phone to see what, even

“if I don't get an update on my phone, I can't go 20 minutes without updating.”

Okay. Is this anything on this story? Anything on this story? Anything on this story? But that's become the, that's normal, so it's not work.

Right. And so, you know, you and I can both look and say, okay, here are the day stories out there. Okay, let's search for these, you know, audio cuts, whatever. But we can do that in our mind because we've done it so many times.

So that's not work. But then when it comes down to it, we can do all that stuff. And then you see one audio cut or two or three audio cuts from the Democrats during the day and you're like, well, it's just too easy for all the show prep we did yesterday. Oh, I got to do this play this and go home.

Yeah. This is this is it. I mean, I got to do this. We were playing it in the pre show meeting and it was like, well, okay, that was easy. That was the pre show meeting because one of our narratives have been over the past

couple of weeks. And this is after Bernie Sanders. And then Gavin Newsom came out and said, we don't know how to find our birth certificates. We just don't know. And what was it yesterday that, you know, had to be yesterday.

There was something else that was said that it wasn't on the same topic, but it was, it was like, okay, they're playing dumb again.

And we, we've always talked about the fact that if you look at liberalism, which the Democratic

party is and the wacko liberalism today is a Democratic party. There are no moderate Democrats. Right. You know, they're just not. They may pretend that they're moderate, but they're not.

There is radical as, as you can possibly get. And so they've been playing the Victor oppressor relationship for the longest time.

We got to find people that are oppressed victims and then the oppressors of those people.

And we stated that the basic concept of a political party in a free society is to unite people. Yeah. That has to be what you're doing.

“You have to unite people behind, you know, certain values.”

You cannot keep, you know, just cutting more pieces of the pie of victims because then you get more oppressors. Yeah. And we give the perfect example is the radical transgender movement where you have the women's movement had to completely shut down completely.

There is no women's movement on the left anymore. It's gone. Right. And it was because they would have been the oppressors. Right.

Maybe where it's on the right fighting for women's spots on sports. Exactly. And so you had people like Martin and Everettalova who was viewed as a hero because she came out, but 45 years ago, yeah, yeah. And she was viewed as a hero.

Now she's viewed as an oppressor. And we said, you can't do that. You can't do that. You just can't keep doing that. You can't.

You take that and you combine it with identity politics where you judge people by groups. Not individuals and you end up alienating people. Yeah. And then you get to the point, eventually, and I will say this.

I never thought that the Democratic Party would get to the point of insanity as we have

seen on so many issues. I never thought you'd have a major political party outright say we don't need border enforcement anymore. As you're doing right now, they don't want ice. Right.

Right.

“I think the two audio cuts that we played yesterday along this line were Mayor Fry and”

Jeffries. I think it was both on TSA right. Oh, yeah. That's right. Yeah.

We're Jeffries. Jeffries come out and said, well, just hire more TSA agents. Yeah. They're not going to pay you into it. Do you understand what's going on?

Yeah. That was it.

And so we've come up with this narrative after Bernie Sanders came out and went, I don't

know how to find my birth certificate and Gavin Newsom. I don't know how to find my birth certificate. They went, wow, they got burned on the identity politics both of them did. They got burned and so did many Democrats on saying, well, women married women don't have the ability to do it and blacks and other minorities just don't know how to get their

birth certificate. Right. And then you got immediate pushback from many blacks and many and many women because if you look at the polling, they all want voter ID and they all know how to find their birth certificate.

Yeah. And so they're like stopping racist. So they had to find, we've got to find some other way to go. Where do we go? Where do we go?

Where do we go? Where do we go? We'll be as stupid as the people that vote for us. Yes. We'll be the leaders of the party.

We'll be the media leaders and we'll say, well, no, how to find our birth certificate either. So we're the stupid idiots leading the stupid idiots. So we're all victims because we're all stupid. We're all incompetent and the oppressor are the Republicans that apparently all know how to find their birth certificates and independence and everybody else if you look at the

polling. Well, I'm waiting for them to say, listen, if you know how to find your birth certificate, you're clearly maga. Well, I'm waiting for that next. Here we go.

Joe Scarborough. Okay. This is Joe Scarborough on with Mike Barnacle and Chuck Schumer. Yeah. Now, the two others, I don't know who the other guy is sitting in there and Mika just

sits there with the blank look on her face. But you have Joe Scarborough, Mike Barnacle and Chuck Schumer now. All have no idea how to find their birth certificates. Here we go. I couldn't believe it when I heard.

“I'm like, no, this has to be, is this artificial intelligence?”

Nope. Here we go. All right. And about your idea, Mike. Let me ask you a question.

Could you find your birth certificate? No, I could. Could you find your birth certificate? No, I could. And it's real quick.

This is. Trump said it. He said this is the way, when he knows he's getting killed on the back of the election. It's to bag. It's to cheat and steal the election in.

Yeah, having a birth certificate is to steal an election. That's right. Being having I voter ID, yeah. But none of them know how to find their birth certificate. So the whole point is Chuck Schumer saying, I'm an idiot leading idiots.

Yes. Joe Scarborough is saying, I'm an idiot in the media that is trying to attract other idiots

They're all a bunch of idiots who don't know how to do simple tasks. And they immediately turned to Trump. So they almost did what I joked about a moment ago.

This is all about Trump that everybody basically saying, if you know, well, I don't know how

to. We don't know how to this. And Trump, with all of his birth certificate finders, these deplorable birth certificate finders, they almost connected it, because they immediately turned it to Trump. This is all about Trump and oh, oh, oh, oh, and none of us can, and I'm waiting for them

to look into the camera. I'm waiting for Scarborough and he's to do the FU if you can't handle the truth. Hey liberals, FU if you can find your birth certificate. I'm waiting for him to do something. And we just keep finding more.

It's almost as if, okay, this is acceptable. We can all pretend we don't know how to find our birth certificates. Now, the fact is they do, of course they, of course, they know how to find their birth certificates, because they've had to get the position where they had and security clearances and everything

“that they've that you've had to do in your life at one time or another, you have to find”

your birth certificate. Yes. License and most states enhance license, you look at all these things that you need to get. You have a current license, do you have a, do you ever, you and I have been screened about the secret service in our years and doing this because we were, we were covering

presidential nominees, we were covering campaigns at FBI, if you're going to, if you're going to get access, then you go through a special screening, FBI screening on FBI, I got for going up with the Thunderbirds. Yeah. Yeah.

And I went with the Thunderbird. I got about the Treasury Department, which is the Treasury Department is the secret service, Treasury Department and also FBI in order to go up in the, and then I, when

I covered dull and, and Jack Camp, and when I was working in Buffalo and their first, their

first rally was right there. I also got, I had to go down to the FBI office. Yeah. I had to go down and then, you know, I was, you know, ask questions, whatever, and for me, it was a Dan quail.

Wow. Wow, holy, so, so, and then plus everything, so they're lying to you, they know how to find their birth certificate. Yeah. Yeah.

Well, it's either, I'll give the bet, let's, since we don't know, we can tell you that it's one of two things, either they truly are complete idiots and don't know how to do basic tasks in life, which means Chuck Schumer should not have risen to the level that he's risen, Joe Scarborough should not have risen to the lower level that he has risen to, and

Mike Barnacle, the same thing, or they're lying to you.

Right. And the whole thing, and we know they're lying. But they do, you know, these people have, I mean, I know some of them, they fly private they have, you know, other means of transportation, but if you're flying commercial, you have prepass, do you go through, I mean, because the screening, we know the screening

process there. Yeah, pre-check, and I, I know they travel, they have passports. Well, I look at it, you know, my enhanced license, my TSA pre-check, my passport, you know, all those things, you had to prove that you were citizen. Remember, they still do it anymore.

I've worked here for so long.

“I believe when I got this job originally, I had to prove that I was an American citizen.”

Remember that? I told them to do that. That was kind of a joke. No. No.

No. Not this. No. I originally, when I got hired, it was, I had to have a copy of, I had to have, they had to make a copy of my license and Social Security card.

Was that it? Is that how they knew you were, then they checked to see if you were a citizen? Yeah. The thing was, you had to prove you were a citizen to get the job because that was the point.

And I don't think HR does that anymore. In fact, those security will tell you, if you've lost your card, in most cases, you don't have to have it. You just need to know your number. But I will tell you with my wife being so involved in, and HR systems, the, the computer

systems, where you go to check your paste up and all that, she will tell you that a lot of people can't remember the Social Security number. I wonder Chuck Schumerkin, remember his Social Security number.

“But, but you have to prove who you are when you had to be, to get paid.”

The whole thing, the thing is that, you know, if you're on the 90s was, you had to prove you were a citizen to work. And if you want to get paid just Social Security number, you know, has to be a reward. Yeah, that's a, that's a given anyway. Yeah.

In fact, I know exactly where my, I know exactly where my, uh, birth certificate is.

I know where my documents are. You know what, Gary? I did this thing. I went to a store where they sell file cabinets for, uh, the liberals out there. File cabinets.

Just write that down. File, separate word cabinets. And you put folders in the folders. Right. But the point is now, you put your papers.

That's not the point they're bringing up.

“The point they're bringing up is they don't have, that's what I'm saying.”

This is absurd. So everybody knows how to do it. Right. They don't, they don't have the burser. They don't have it in their files.

That's my point.

They don't know how to find their burser tickets, which is very easy.

You know what, hospital, good. God. By the time I was, uh, five, six years old, it was pounded into me where I was born. Yeah. Of course.

Hospital, I was born and what the court. And what everybody knows how to find it. And by the way, if you don't, you can Google it. And, and what was it 50 years later, uh, is when I didn't have a copy of my burser certificate, I forgot what it was for.

And I simply went, oh, okay, go to the records department of the City of Buffalo, New York. That's or some people have it if they're not, if they're in a particular smaller town, you go to the county. Yeah.

I was born on an Air Force Base. Right. For me, it's, I don't know if that's the case with the county. I was born in, but that is the case for me. Yeah, I have to go to the county.

It's, and it's very simple to do it. Uh, I had to get a couple of copies a year ago. Yeah. And, uh, it was, I did online, boom, next couple of days, boom, had my certificate. Yeah.

The point is, everybody knows how to do it. Everybody, they keep, everybody keeps, uh, and if you don't, you've got a phone, you can Google it. Yeah. It's so stupid.

I know. In fact, they're going out of their way. They're being stupider than they are trying to portray themselves. It, it, that's possible. We are right, I radio brought to you by Hot Shot Secret.

Hi, I'm Jen Lumis, a transport safety expert at JJ Keller.

“When driving, you need to manage the space around your vehicle so that there's enough space”

to allow you to adjust when traffic conditions change.

The space ahead of your vehicle is the most important.

One rule of thumb is to allow at least one second for each ten feet of vehicle length at speeds below 40 miles per hour. At greater speeds, add an additional second. It's impossible to keep other drivers from tailgating you, but there are some things you can do to make it safer, such as increasing your following distance, avoiding quick lane changes,

and slowing down. There are also several things you should do to ensure that there is plenty of space between the side of your vehicle and other vehicles. Don't hug the center line and avoid traveling alongside other vehicles in strong winds. This tip was brought to you by JJ Keller and Associates.

Visit us at JJ Keller.com. Get in touch with Red Eye Radio, toll free at 866 from Mindy Red Eye. We are Red Eye Radio. He is your currently non-hearing McNamara. Yeah, so we had to play that audio cut and we're just saving all of these audio cuts

of Democrats and seeing how many now are going to continue to try to convince the public. I mean, this is, think about this. They've worked shop this. They said around. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

You had, you had a great point.

“You had people that, and we don't, I love talking about this part of it that whenever something”

comes like this, when you start seeing it, it's like they're workshopping there's a trend. Right. They believe it's working. This is a trend. Really, you know, Brock Consultants and said, look, you cannot be telling your constituents

that agree with something that you disagree with, that they don't have the ability to do it when there are minorities and women. Right. Now, we can only do that. Maybe to women we can because of course, we're total misogynists and sexists in the radical transgender

movement, but you can't get away with it with minorities. So just pretend you're as stupid as you claim they are. Exactly. And that's our plan for reviving the Democratic Party. We are the party of idiots leading our constituency of idiots.

Right. Our constituents of idiots. That's like what? That's exactly what we're all. But what I want to do is not to get a lot of students.

The master of the club is called SoftBeyond, the internet. It's like a master's real-time. I mean, you can say that you're a real-time. Yes, you're a real-time, right? But you don't believe it.

egal! Zauber word "fellus" for a track. Make the whole thing like this.

That's right. Safe! Like this.

Hold it, your money is back.

Now you're a real-time. Tired of partisan noise. America's more divided than ever.

“But independent Americans is adding the light to contrast all that she--”

Independent Americans, daily news with Army Veteran, Paul Rikov. Pressing issues of the day, the leaders who are shaping what America will be in the future. We're going to bring the righteous media five eyes. Independence, Integrity, Information, Inspiration, and Impact. Join the movement.

Independent Americans, from belief, follow and listen on your favorite platform.

On our website, runiroydiosho.com, show info with stations, podcasts, and more read it.

I read you. Remember we said about a week ago. This is what we think will happen to open up DHS. We weren't fully correct on it. We were close.

What we said was the Republicans, I said, what I suspect is something like this that the Republicans

“would say, all right, we were going to fund everything else except TSA because it's already”

funded. And then the Democrats would eventually come around and say, all right, see none of us voted to fund TSA even though they're funded anyway. Yeah. That's not what Republicans say.

It's very close. But what Republicans are saying, according to Politico and Senator Katie Brick said, "Brit yesterday, told reporters just we do." Senate Republicans met with Trump and think, believe they found a path to ending the shutdown. Now what the plan is, it's very, it is, I will say, it is in the spirit of what we said,

right? It is. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

“What they believe, what they're going to do is they're going to say, all right, Democrats”

will give, will give you what you need will compromise, there will be parts of ice that we will not fund. And so they will pass the bill. And then after they pass the bill, Republicans through reconciliation will bring that money back to ice and give it to ice.

Okay. So what you're doing is the pitch according to two people with knowledge of it was to pass the funding bill that would fund all of the Department of Homeland Security except specific parts of immigration and customs enforcement, which is already funded under last year's GOP mega bill.

Graham told colleagues on the Senate floor after the meeting that the president is now open to a new party line reconciliation bill after rejecting that idea over the weekend, Senator John Kennedy said that could give Republicans a path to pass more ice funding if they can muster the votes.

A second person with knowledge of the discussions also said that a new reconciliation bill

was possible after the White House meeting, though Senate Republicans have been cool to the idea given the uphill climate would be it would be to unite their members, the House and the White House are behind the bill. The Republicans are looking at using reconciliation to pass more ice funding as well as parts of their partisan GOP elections bill.

Now they don't say here that they're going to claw back on it, though. You would think that word would be there, right? Yeah. Right. The White House did not respond or do a request for comment, Republicans caution that nothing

is official until Trump backs it publicly, but the GOP colleagues involved in the page as negotiations on an increasingly confident that they would soon have a deal in hand, not going to get into the details, but I'm more optimistic that by the end of the week we'll fund the Department of Homeland Security, Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins said.

Senate Majoral Leader John Thunes said, hope so when he was asked Monday night whether a deal was in hand. Now the interesting thing is, is that because are they going to allow a claw back on money that was already appropriated through 2029 and then pass it again through reconciliation

I would assume that was going to happen, but when I actually read the story from Politico

it never says they're going to claw back.

It says Trump just wants more spending for ice, which is I'm not clear. Yeah, but it is in the spirit of what we said would probably happen last week. Yeah, it's a kind of a bit of a slight of hand kind of thing, shell game, you know, move it around over here for a minute and it's going to get done. I felt all along it's going to get done.

It's just how angry are you going to let people get it in the TSA lines during spring break.

“I think the Democrats wanted this during spring break.”

We're coming to the end of spring break season and I think it's now, you know, okay. There's really not much more because now you're affecting business travel anyway. But, you know, it's going to be, they want, I think they wanted to make the statement. Now, you've got Mark Wayne Mullin, his, he's, he's in and everything is done.

And I think this was as it always is with a left a show.

Let me read it here specifically, their pitch according to two people with knowledge of it was to pass a funding bill that would fund all of DHS except specific parts of immigration and customs enforcement, which is already funded under last year's GOP Make a Bill. Well, that sentence alone says, well, you're trying to pass something that the Democrats won't pass.

So are they clawing back on the money or are the Democrats completely collapsing? Well, the Democrats weren't involved in this negotiation. We sent it Republicans with the president and nowhere in here does it say claw back. Yeah, I'm going to check the hill.com to see if well, I'm reading a story at the hill.com. And well, no, I didn't see that.

I haven't seen that yet in this, but you have Thun saying the Senate Majority Leader talking about the idea of passing the Save America Act through budget reconciliation on March 10. And he said they've looked at that, but it's, you know, it's not, there's no easy way to do it. So the question is, are they trying to, is there a, I don't know, reconciliation is going

“to be basically the Hail Mary and the Democrats already know that they can get it done?”

Now the question would be, is, do they have 51? Do they have enough GLPers on board to get that done? I don't know about the Save America Act, but if you're talking about the HS funding, certainly. Well, the, the thing is when the president said that I said politically, I went, well,

no, get the funding done and let the Save Act stand alone because you've got a majority, a massive majority on that bill to begin with. Yeah. Right. So the Republicans told Trump that they would also attempt to pass elements of the Save

America Act, which Trump has called his number one legislative priority in the follow-up reconciliation bill.

“I think we showed them that we can run a parallel process.”

We can fund the HS now and have a second reconciliation bill that would put a down payment on some of the Save America Act. Yeah. And with the meeting, and Kennedy said, now, this goes back the ways, but Kennedy's on record of saying, you know, the easiest way to get the Save America Act is the most efficient way

he's said is to try and do it through reconciliation. But again, as soon as it's, it's threading the needle here, how much can they actually fit into it and still, you know, keep their 51? I love this. This made me laugh.

Graham, however, was Lindsey Graham, was was tight-lift about the prospect. This is from the hill.com about the prospects of whether Trump would agree to break up the Department of Homeland Security funding bill to reopen the transportation security

administration and other critical agencies, such as FEMA and the Coast Guard, we'll see

what happens. He said, I'm not going to say any more, so leave me alone. Because when they suggested sending aside funding for ICE to allow the rest to, I don't

Yeah. That's the key.

Because then Democrats, if you said we're clawing back this money, this money from ICE.

Well, but if the Democrats already know that this is just a reconciliation play and the GOP's going to do it anyway through reconciliation, they're trying to get a victory now. And then when the Republicans do it, said there's nothing we can do about it, but they don't say clawing back.

That's the key to it. All Democrats would have to have claw back in there. Right. Right. You would think that's, maybe not.

I don't know. Yeah, I don't know. We'll see.

“I think with Mark Wayne mulling in, I think they wanted to get his confirmation done clearly.”

But now that that is pretty much done, here's what I'm wondering with, you saw the

thing that went down at San Francisco Airport at SFO. Yes. All right. So there was the ICE had been targeting somebody who had deportation orders going back at some time, and it wasn't just a random screening and they found somebody that actually

were looking for that person. And then there was a show basically because you had people filming this and asking the agents, their name, and badge number, and everything else, and it actually, again, turned out that there were deportation orders that went back along, I think a couple of years. But they had deportation orders for the send of visual.

And so they, of course, they, the liberals made this to be a big show. I think that I want that show to go on a few more days. So those were brought up that was before ICE, you know, to help T.S.C. was even brought in in a Friday. I know they weren't brought in to San Francisco, because San Francisco doesn't need to help.

But this is right. Again, understand what this is about, Democrats are attempting to inconvenience people who are paying through their tickets for security, as we mentioned yesterday, you're paying in your ticket for it, they're trying to make your life when you travel a living hell to protect illegal immigrant criminals.

Yep. That's what it comes down to, right. And as we know, they're trying to use the two instances where the two people who were killed because they were obstructing law enforcement, yeah, they weren't innocent people. Right.

And on the Democrats, you, you say, I'm as, I'm as now and even on CNN, they're just, we're, we're just as bad as a ran. No, no, absolutely not.

“And that's why, even if you come to a deal, you need to be, you need to be saying it over”

and over again, that Democrats want your life to be a living hell because they wish to protect illegal immigrant criminals over law, biting and innocent citizens of the United States. Yep. We're still not doing it to my satisfaction.

They should be out everywhere that should be part of the, look, if the, the Democrats can on a talking point, hey, we're idiots. We don't know how to get our burser to begin and that keeps expanding, expanding and expanding or idiots. And we don't know how to do it.

We're the, we're the leaders of the party of idiots representing the people of the United States that are also idiots that we accuse of being idiots. Now, understand, we are not calling them idiots. That's what the Democratic Party leadership and on MS now on the Joe Scarborough show their promoting were idiots, leading idiots.

Yeah. The idiot media. That's, that's the idiot. Watch. Those are the talking points.

GOP, be the smart ones.

“So I don't know if this is claw back or Trump wanted more funding in this bill for ice”

than it was already appropriated. That hasn't been made clear in either article.

And it's just amazing that both the Hill and Politico nobody uses.

They would claw back the money that was already at, you know, that was already past. In order to get the Democrats to agree to this, and then put it back in reconciliation. The word claw back is not used. Right. So I still don't know where we are here.

Right. We are right. I radio. We'll be right back with more Red I radio with every currently and Gary McNamara.

different articles and nowhere can I find the word claw back.

“The only thing I find in AI is that Republicans do not want to claw back what they are”

already passed, but this may be the articles were before today's, maybe deal with Senate Republicans and the president and they talk about the president in the DHS once more funding for ice. Yeah. So is that where they're going to, is that where they're going to compromise on?

Well, I don't know. And who knows, really a deal between the Senate Republicans and the president means nothing. Yeah. Right. I mean, right.

Yeah. One of Democrats want, and we don't know specifically what they want, except those that are screaming, you're rid of ice completely, or make it so they can't make arrests inside the country, which is defunding ice.

Now, it's red eye radio, Gary McNamara, and Eric Hurley talk about everything from

politics to social issues, and news of the day, whether you're up late or you're just starting your day, welcome to the show from the Relief Factor Studios. This is Red Eye Radio. All the cross America, we are Red Eye Radio. He is our Crony and I'm Gary McNamara.

Bye. I just get, uh, got to hear somewhere. I got you. Man, I can't find my works certificate. We're, I'm, I'm looking for my ver, I don't know.

Uh, you know, I was trying to find my butt the other day, and I was using both hands. I, uh, I'm going to go, I'm going to go in a different direction. You choose to go in a different direction. What is that? What is that red light mean at the intersection?

I can't find my birth certificate.

What is that?

“Uh, I just go to start, remember the movie Starman?”

Yeah. Remember, remember when the light turned yellow and he speeds through, and she screams at, it screams at the alien who was driving, uh, who was, uh, Jeff Bridges, right? Yeah. Yeah.

Right. That screams. What are you doing? What are you doing? What are you doing?

I paid attention to what you did. Yeah. Red is stop. Yeah. Yeah.

Yeah. I was actually, I was sitting at a stop sign one time, and I was probably really tired. I wasn't drunk. I don't drink a drive.

“Uh, but I was sitting sitting in a stop sign, and my wife was in the car with me, and”

we're sitting in the stop sign, and I'm apparently, because I'm sitting there a while. Not waiting for cars. I'm waiting for the stop sign to turn green. I'm like, I'm, I'm sitting there. I'm like, are you going to go?

And I said, honey, honey, I'm trying to read this sign. I point up to the stop sign. I'm trying to read this sign now. I don't know what it means, but I was just like, I was just, and it kind of in the days.

I was out of it. And I was so tired. Um, but yeah, these are, you know, um, these are clearly the talking points for the Democrats. Uh, listen, we're stupid, people are stupid, let's be stupid like the people.

Let's be the common folks, because they're stupid, let's pretend to be stupid. Yeah. And so, because they're stupid, they can say anything and just say, look, we're the party of stupid. Yeah.

And our opposition are those Republicans who think they know everything. Yeah. Yeah. They know how to find their birth certificate. Right.

Those damn elitists, they know how to find their birth variables. We don't know. We don't know. We're victims here. We don't, like I said, uh, I keep thinking of, uh, Phil Hartman.

Yeah, we're the caveman party. Yeah. We don't know your fancy ways of finding your birth certificate. Yeah. Who knows, uh, how we don't know that, uh, by the way, it works on every level.

Think about it. Not just voter ID on the border. Yeah. But who are you? I don't have any ID no birth certificate.

Well, of course, nobody can, nobody actually has one.

So go ahead, come on in, uh, uh, the liberal transgender movement. [LAUGHTER]

“Well, what, what, what were you, what were you assigned at birth?”

I don't know. I can't find my birth certificate. Of course. And nobody can find their birth certificate. That's right.

Okay. So whatever you say you are, what do you say you want? It applies. It works for the liberals for everything. So there, there you have it.

I mean, you just, you know, well, just identify as this person. Okay. You know, Nate Bargaz, he made a joke about it in one of his stand-up specials about his name is Nathaniel, but on his ID it says Nate. And then someone who ever booked his flight put Nathaniel on the ticket and Gary as a

someone who flies frequently, you know, that's going to cause problems at the airport Nate has this whole bit about it, you know, and it's no. They put Nathan on the ticket. His name is Nathaniel. No.

“And he goes by Nate and, and, uh, I think I, I can't remember what it, what it said”

on this ID. It said something different. And of course, you know, there's, there's the block. So just look, just choose a name and, uh, he made the joke, hey, look. And this would be how liberals would, would think.

I mean, it was a self-deprecating joke for, for Nate, but this is how they would think. Look, that's a picture of me right there on the ID. So that's me. That's not how you, that's not how you, that's not how you prove it. Yeah, that, that means a selfie is ID.

Oh, that will be it. The blue states will say, okay, butter ID, all you need is a selfie to qualify. Yeah. Yeah. That's how it will do it.

I mean, then, I like how you, you know, you came up with that because it's really true.

If everything revolves around a burser to have a kid, well, then you can basically

justify everything, uh, every, uh, insane, uh, and that is insane, yeah, every insane policy, yeah, major policy that the Democrats want to, you know, want to do, including the radical transgender movement, open borders. Right. Oh, no, it's sex. We are. Right. We can find our birth certificate. Right.

Right. So we get to self-identify since we don't have the capability of finding our burser to make it because we're a bunch of victim idiots, victimization is now our idiocy. Yeah. All right, other, this, this is a, this is going to put us on this narrative now, probably

for the next couple of years of stupidity versus just, uh, common sense or stupidity versus the rest of the public that has the basic knowledge to complete basic tasks. Yeah. Uh, but the, uh, the late male balance at the Supreme Court, uh, most of the analysis is, yeah, they're going to overturn it and can't be late. Right. And it's simply this that the founding fathers and even Congress in the 1800s, when

they passed this law, they looked at it and said, there was no male imbalance. I mean, it was like, but they're not saying male imbalance are against the law on the federal election. What they're saying is it has to be in the hands of the election bureau on that day. Right.

“Because that's what it's not in the male is not them having it. And according to the text”

of the law and what the intent was because everybody was going to the polls. Mm-hmm. That election day means it has to be in possession of the government by election day. Right. By the end of election day, not postmarked. Right. But in the hands in, you know, in the hands. Now, the, the, the liberals tried to debate that, well, you have, but they're already filled it out. You know, it is doesn't matter. No, then how far can you extend it out? Right.

I think it's been lost in the male or a, a number of, uh, balance, get lost in the male. If you have a thousand ballots to get lost in the male and show up, three months later, you change the election because they're legitimate ballots. Right. And so that, that's

basically, basically what it is. It's like, no, it has to be in the, and early voting, there's

no problem because they have it by election day. Right. Early voting is, well, early voting is an election day. What doesn't matter? It's in their hands by election day. Right.

by election day, full time. Now, I have seen a lot of Republicans. I won't say necessarily

“conservative say, well, what we need to do, I think they were having this debate. Five,”

I don't know. One of the box shows us having it. Uh, and they were, they were talking about, um, what we need to do is, no, everybody goes to the poll on election day, except military. And maybe special circumstances, you go to the poll. We make an national holiday. And I'm like, no, no, no, national holiday. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. What is the national holiday mean? No, the private sector for, for so many national holidays, you don't get

the day off. Right. Only the, only the federal government workers get the day off. Right.

And maybe state workers or whatever, only government gets a ton of these holidays off. And

on election day, you're not going to have, you'll still have companies going, no, if you need to go vote, go vote. Right. But we're not going to make it a day off. Yeah, a lot

“of companies will do that. Just proactively, don't look if you want to go vote. Um, you”

know, get with your supervisor. The day before, let them know you're going to go vote. And you'll be out during this time. And look at this discrimination towards we talk show host. We can't, we couldn't leave a middle to show to go vote. No, we can't. You know, we can't, we can't, we can't to see how we're discriminated against. That's why we should

be able to vote on Facebook. We're, we're victims. We're, we're, we're, we're victims

and oppressors at the same time because we have a clue. And if you have a clue, you're an oppressor these days, because Democrats don't have a clue. We're, we're, we're burned should we get vote on election day with ought to be in a holiday? We need the entire day off to go and vote. I, I think there's discrimination against the night shift. You know, oh, yes. I mean, post COVID nothing's open. Now, after not just convenient stores.

Yeah, a few pharmacies and, and few ERs, all the places at charge. Yeah. Exactly. See, price discrimination against the night shift. That's right. Right. Banks aren't open. I mean, I know I can, you know, do things on my phone. But I can't, I don't even know how to find my phone. Well, it's in my hand right now. I still don't know where it is. I mean, they can play stupid. I can play stupid. I'm pretty good at it. My phone broke.

What do I do? My car broke. Yeah. I don't know what to do. I don't know how to find my burser to get. Oh, my gosh. This is so much damn fun. Oh, it's, they're just making it easy. They just make it easy. And, but they want to get the narrative going because they want the rank and file going, well, we don't even, nobody even knows how to find their burser to get. Nobody knows even our leaders don't know how to. Nobody knows we all

know that. We all know that we don't know. Some big stupid party. Let's have a stupid party. Wow. Wow. So, yeah. Legal in every state now. Because stupidity. That's too. No. It's a right. Stupidity is a right stupidity is a right. I have a right to not know what I don't know. You don't recognize my stupidity is a right. I have the right to be stupid. Right. Actually you

do. Right. Life. Everybody. Stupidity. And the pursuit of something. I don't know what it is. Edibles. There you go. Well, that's happiness, isn't it? Mingo. Oh, the crime safe. That's where they got the term happy feet. Exactly. Oh, my gosh. That's all right. I'm sorry. That's a 70's reference. Yeah. That's. Let's get small. The old man is coming through here. Yeah. When I was

“young, that's what we call it. Yeah. I was a kid listening to Steve Martin. He's a”

let's get small. And I was like, I don't even know what that means. Then later I figured out, oh, that's just Steve Martin being silly. You know, the roadside test was, hey, can you fit into this balloon. You know, it's really interesting. I was, I went to the doctor yesterday. My normal checkup. Yeah. And we got into a discussion because, you

my brother and I've always been great together. But my brother just really got a cell phone

“and learned how to text in the last year. Oh, my older brother. He just didn't do it. He just”

wasn't. Yeah. We go back and forth every day. And being brothers, all you do is insult each other, every other, every other text is, you know, you drunken slob, you know, that kind of stuff that brothers do back and forth to each other. Yeah. And my, my brother is just, you know, and it really is interesting going back and looking at old Hollywood as he's insulting me, he goes, you're just like, uh, he got into, you know, all the old celebrities

and how much they used to drink and smoke. And I was talking to him. Yeah. I started my doctor about that today and, you know, because every time he says, oh, your liver,

liver's in great shape, really. And it was like, you know, in my younger days, it's like,

you thought you might have been over drinking. But when I go back and look at it, even in my college days, I was working two jobs. Yeah. You know, on my drink twice a month. Right. And, you know, way back then. And then you look at those Hollywood celebrities. And my brother and I are just, he's obsessed, you know, we're, we're both going, look at this person, you know, we look it up because, but about this person, they died at 50. Yeah. And, you know,

it's like Michael Lannon, I was talking to my doctor today, I said, what they used to smoke and drink is unbelievable. Michael, Michael Lannon, four packs of cigarettes a day, and he

“started drinking in the morning and drank all day. I remember his last appearance on Johnny”

Carson when I went, oh, man, a guy so healthy, who's going to die because we was going to die. Right. And he just looked so healthy, he was thin and had a full head of hair. Oh, yeah. Oh, my God. He was lucky. He lived till 50 with what he was doing. Mm-hmm. Yeah. And it's just a, I, it's just a thing of that, that my brother and I just find very interesting that they all, and they all wore suits. And my brother goes, they all wore suits. And they were buzzed all day,

but they were very professional in doing it. Well, there's like my brother. I go, you're becoming a stand-up comedian. Well, what was the, what was the, how do I would squares? So what they would do, they still do this on game shows. They film an entire season in like a week or two. Right. So what they do is they film several episodes in a day. Like, I don't know how many it is now, but back then, they would do two or three a day. Right. And they would say, you could tell

which were the, which were the, the ones where, you know, they'd film an episode or two, go to lunch and then come back. Because when everybody's laughing, they went to, you know, the three martini lunch thing. You know, it was just common to go drink at lunch. And for celebrities, especially, you know, not every one of them, but a number of the, you like, I remember when I worked at the bank, and if you were the employee of the month,

“yeah, the bosses took you out to drink. Wow. Could you imagine that happening in this day?”

Yeah, no, not at all. Wow. Yeah, it's, it's crazy.

Luckily, I was never the employee of the month too often.

According to me, I was, I might not have survived that, but you look at, I brought it up because the other thing I saw is that bars, I mean, drinking's way down with young people. Yeah. Yeah. Is it, is it edible or they just not doing anything? I don't, maybe they're just doing other things or maybe nothing. I don't know what the trend is. We do see fentanyl, of course, the overdoses and, yeah, and all that, but yeah, we are right, I radio.

This morning's USDA farm report is brought to you by house products tested, trusted, guaranteed, since 1920. Spring is here. Agrealing season for Betty is not too far behind. That means more consumer demand for meat. And in the case of livestock analysts like USDA's Michael McCottal, seeing how that translates to activity in cattle feed lots. That's typically when we see marketings and slaughter it, it's begin to increase. That's something to look forward to, which is we

begin to track the pace of slaughter as we head into the grilling season. USDA's March cattle feed report shows inventory and feed lots is slightly lower than the same time last year. Yep, McCottal points out. Do the, in fact, our marketings have been down in placement center lower. One of the implications that have is that more of the cattle that are in feed lots now are tilted more towards animals that have been on feed for more than 150 days. So,

well, more animals that are market ready in those feed lots right now. So, as we come up to that seasonal, we're beef comes into higher demand. There will be a fair number of cattle in those feed lots that are ready to come out and be marketing process in the beef to satisfy the grilling season demand. I'm Rod Bayed reporting for the U.S. Department of Agriculture in Washington, D.C. This report brought to you by Senax Fules and Loves.

One's open for your calls. 866-90 Red Eye on Red Eye Radio.

Interesting. I really don't take much yet out of, and we'll have more specific details coming up

on this story. The Trump administration, political has his quietly win, Iran's parliament speaker is a potential partner and even a future leader. This is from

“Politico. Remember, there has been no direct negotiations between the United States and Iran.”

Now, we've had five different other foreign countries that we'll get into here following the bottom of the hour than are having preliminary negotiations with the Iranian Guard. Yeah. Right. Public and Guard. Right. We'll get to that coming up.

Good morning, Donald. Our Red Eye Radio Live. Every night on the Red Eye Radio App,

available in the App Store, Red Bay. Radio. And he is our fellow, and I'm Gary McNamara. Welcome. And a good morning, Donald, our Red Eye Radio App today, and you can listen, when and where you choose. Coming up in a minute and a half is our possible deal between the United States and Iran and the other countries in the Middle East. We'll get to that.

“I love the more weather getting some things done. That's what I love about”

it getting outside more. And I can do that without the aches and pains of wow, trying to overcome what I just did really the aches and pains after chores in the past were really bad for me, especially in my hips and in my joints. I could feel that after working even just a few hours outside, I would feel that for days not anymore. Thanks to relief factor. This is what I want for you. You can do something about your pain. You can do something about your pain. And relief factor is a

100% drug-free research-based formula that was designed created to help your body's natural inflammatory response function. I take it every day. I suggest you do too, because I want you to get the same benefits for key ingredients working for you. And here's how we get you started.

“Relief factors three week quick start. Just 1995 and all you have to do is visit reliefactor.com.”

Reliefactor.com or call 800-4 relief, 800-4 relief or go to reliefactor.com and use red eye at the drop-down for your three week quick start at 1995. A couple of minutes ago, I said Republican. I was thinking of Iraq. I said Republican. Yeah, okay. No, no, no. The Republican guy. Oh, you said Republican guy.

Yeah, that's Iraq. Not the revolutionary guy, which is in Iran. I caught myself.

Okay, I caught myself. All right, okay. But this from Politico, there's a couple of stories out there. First, the Trump administration is quietly Wayne Iran's parliament speaker as a potential partner, or even future leader, as a president signals a ship from military pressure towards a negotiated end game. Mohammed Gallabov, I don't know if I'm pronouncing it right or not, the 64-year-old who is repeatedly threatening the U.S. and its allies with retaliation has seen it by at least some in the White

House as a workable partner who could lead Iran and negotiate with the Trump administration in the war's next phase according to two administration officials. But the White House is not ready to commit to anyone person hoping to to stress test multiple candidates as they look for someone willing to make a deal, said the two people who granted anonymity to describe internal thinking, he's a hot option when administration officials said cautioning that no decisions have been made.

He's one of the highest, but we've got to test them and we cannot rush into it. The administration's interest in pinpointing and negotiating partner signals a desire to find some way out of the Iran war White House press secretary Caroline Levitt said these are sensitive diplomatic discussions and the United States will not negotiate through the news media. Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal had an article, the back channel diplomacy behind Trump's U-turn on Iran. I don't know if it's

necessarily U-turn. I don't think it's a U-turn. Well, we don't know yet because we don't know anything. We don't know where it's going. Well, I don't know what, the United, I don't know what the administration wants to negotiate. Yeah, right. You know, I think it was a national view that said

on the deadline, the U-turn, but I would just say that's a pause. Again, I don't know that

that's a complete turnaround here. No, they meant, they meant, I think they meant on the war. Yeah, or the fact that we're not going to go through. Well, because the sub-hetteline reads, the president backtracked on his threat to strike Iran's power plans after a series of closed door discussions led by Middle Eastern intermediaries. That's not a U-turn.

“No, that's what I'm saying. It could be, but we don't know whether it is because we don't”

know the details. Well, again, if they think they are making progress, then you keep the talks going. But what's the progress? Yeah. What does the goal? What is the end game for the United States?

Now, what we were told in the eight-minute speech that he made at the beginning

was for the people to uprise and to have a Democrat government, a Democratic government. Yeah, what? I said Democrat. No, you don't want that. That could be worse. Oh, yeah. No, no, no, no. Yeah. Yeah. And, but just getting in here, because four ministers from Egypt, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan gathered before dawn Thursday in Riyadh for talks aimed. This is last week at a diplomatic off ramp to the war in Iran. But there was one big

“problem, according to Arab officials and Bobbin the discussions, finding a counterpart in Iran”

to negotiate with earlier that week Israel killed Iran's national security chief who had been considered a viable partner who could engage with the West Egyptian intelligence officials managed

to open a channel with Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard or the paramilitary group that protests

or excuse me, protects the Iranian regime and is a country's most powerful security and political entity and put forward a proposal to halt hostilities for five days to build confidence for ceasefire. Some of the officials said those discussions laid the groundwork for an abrupt reversal more than 7,000 miles away in Florida on Saturday night. The president who spent the weekend in Florida gave Iran an ultimatum to reopen the straight of hormones within 48 hours,

or the US military would obliterate the country's power plans two days later as word of discussions in reaction made its way to the White House Trump reversed course embracing diplomacy with Iran and putting his threatened strikes on hold. Look, when he said that to begin with, I went, are they taking that as a bluff? Because one of the things, as we have said earlier, the administration was even talking about the president was, we don't want to take out the infrastructure

because we want the people to be behind us. If you're taking out their power generation plans, are you hurting the people or are you hurting the regime? Right. It's laughed. Yeah, that's one of the questions. But these none of this has been answered for us. We don't know. And they're not going to tell us until they come to some type of of conclusion on it. But there's not much I can say because I don't know right now what the president wants. Yeah, I don't know what the what the end game

you're what the goal is here. Right. The president was asked about the new Supreme Leader yesterday and he was saying, look, we don't know where he is. We actually don't know that all because there hasn't been any appearance. He's called the Cardboard Iotola. Yeah, you know, it's because they had some praising of a cutout, a cardboard cutout. I thought, man, they totally don't have AI. Do they? But that would be the question, who is in charge, where is that this

“for me this looks like exactly what we talked about early on, just as a layman here, you have to”

find out who's the most loyal. You have to find out how deep the roots are and then, you know, beyond that if there is a there are conversations that are happening. Where does it lead? Who's in charge right now? And I don't know if they know or the question is, I don't know if they know which of those who are remaining at the top is most loyal and also trustworthy. I frankly, for me, I wouldn't trust any of them. But at some point, you have to decide,

is there a way for this to be the regime being pushed out the door if we do have an agreement with whoever's in charge? And again, it's impossible to know. I found the article, and it's a demoed law clinician review, war with the ran to be worth it needs to produce

into the war against Iran and we still don't know what victory looks like. That's a problem because

“victories need to be clearly visible to the ordinary citizen. That's important not only to”

the Republicans political popularity, but as a matter of the democratic legitimacy of our foreign policy, that concerned is heightened when wars are raged entirely on the basis of an executive decision without Congress. I would disagree with them on that. Obviously, in the eight minutes, they laid out what they wanted. He laid out what he wanted. He said to the Iranian people, the goal will be at the proper moment to come out and take over your government in order to get

the government you want, which would be a democracy. A lot of talks about the former

Shah's, about the former Shah's son in a transition government is victory. This is the whole point is victory. Are they just looking for somebody to negotiate with in order to say, our terms are you're out? If the term is, and we looked at these all these possibilities, the possibility could be, no, we've done as much damage where they won't be a nuclear power for years. We're going to allow this Prime Minister to stay in and what still had the same

“oppressive government. Well, here's the thing that the way it played out for Venezuela,”

and the very different situations, but in Venezuela, Maduro's right hand had control of the military and the oil, but the opposition leader that Trump would have rather have had installed in Venezuela to take over and bring greater freedom didn't have control of either. And so the deal was made to look. You get her on the phone, and by the end of the day, by the way, she was singing a different tune completely, literally, then what she had hours before

saying we're working with the Trump administration now and our embassy opened up and the embassy opened up. So the question would be, all right, look, you don't even have to go into exile. You play nice, but we control the game here, every move, and if you sneeze in the wrong direction, we'll know it. And so in controlling the exports and controlling, you know, eventually,

an election, I guess. Again, depending on what the end game would be, but basically the will of the

people eventually being done. Well, it's like the Trump administration is quietly weighing Iran's parliament speaker as a potential partner because I also saw that on social media. Well, no, what he's saying is, you know, you will get to lead the transition with the approval of the United States and may there be a coalition of all those countries we just mentioned that will be

“also a part of it. Well, that's that's that's why this is so much bigger than the Venezuelo”

thing. If you think about it, it's the fact that there's other Middle Eastern nations watching I'm going, no, no, we want regime change, too. And of course, it's not just the U.S. and Israel here. It's, well, it's if you look at this, if there is a truly a coalition, a transition coalition. And the end game for anyone left in the regime at the top would be, you sit quietly, you behave, you don't get out of line, no attacks, nothing and you allow for this transition to happen.

And there's no exile for you. You're just not going to be in power eventually, lightly. Well, I think one of the things that changed the world in even Europe on this was the was the firing of the ballistic missiles at Diego Garcia, the island. Yeah. Now, in neither hit, but the potential and the distance was more than what the world believed. It might not have been with the CIA believed, but now it's public. Right. Yeah. Now it's public or the, you know,

you, well, okay, Iran can hit Europe. Yeah. Right. Iran has the potential to hit great Britain. Yeah. You know, that changes everything at that point. And so I did see, too, with the straight of hormones where it was, well, the presence saying we'd like to have a deal where we and Iran will monitor what goes on in Hormuz or Rose where you say, okay, we're still going to

partnership between you're setting up what you eventually want. It may not won't be there tomorrow,

“but you're setting up this is what we want in order to do it. We want to be partners.”

In the change of your government. Right. Yeah. But we don't know what the United States red line is in negotiations. We don't know. We have no idea. Right. And they haven't now. We know

what the president's goal was early on, but we don't know what the red line is now. Right. We are

“right. I radio. Get in touch with red. I radio told free at 8.6. Monday. Right. I.”

We are right. I radio. He is there. Probably. And I'm Gary McNamara. So until we know what the red line is, you know, this is this is it. This is as far as we will negotiate. Yeah. You know,

we don't know if there's no way to even look at this and say, you know, you're going to have,

“again, both sides making statements, but I can see the critics coming out and saying,”

he's flipped on this already saw the taco signs. Yeah. Yeah. I, you can't do that. No, this situation is unlike any other we've ever seen. Right. In history. And it's going to be very fluid. Even if they come and say, come back and say, even to both sides came back and said, we've got the framework, please, that on Capitol Hill. We've got the framework, but it's still, we don't know where it's going. Right. And that's a fact.

This is Ridi Radio on Westwood 1. The Dan Bontino Show. Damn, I missed you all. I've got so much content bottled up my head. I got a lot of stuff. This is the kind of stuff. It's real. May not hear this anywhere else. Hard truths. There's a lot of stuff to talk about. Then you think it's going to open a lot of eyes and a lot of ignorators are going to get shut down. And a bold perspective, no one else can offer. They are freaking out. It's the comeback.

Everyone's been waiting for. Lovers, haters, friends, supporters to track is your all welcome. I want to hear it all. The Dan Bontino Show. Follow and listen on your favorite platforms. See you there.