[MUSIC]
Now, it's Red Eye Radio, Gary McNamara, and Eric Hurley,
“talk about everything from politics to social issues and news of the day,”
whether you're up late or you're just starting your day. Welcome to the show from the Relief Fector Studios. This is Red Eye Radio. >> All across America, we are Red Eye Radio. He is our Crony and I'm Gary McNamara.
>> Wow, we have a likely voter poll this early. >> What's this early for the 2028 primary? >> I don't even know that I'm a likely voter now. >> We've got, we've likely this a likely voter poll. >> All right.
>> The Harvard Harris poll. >> Okay. >> All right. >> Okay. >> Who leads for the Democrats for 28?
>> For 28. >> Wait, a likely voter for 28. >> A likely voter for 28. >> A likely voter for the primary for 28.
“That's what I mean, it's a likely voter poll.”
They never do likely voter polls this early.
>> Ever. >> All right, but this is for the primary. >> I'm going to say, here's what I'm going to say. Pete Buttigieg. >> No, not even on the list.
>> Calm down my Harris. >> Yes, Harris. How many points does she lead by over Newsom who is in second place? >> 10. >> She leads by 28.
>> 28. >> Harris has 50 percent. She is skyrocketed since the last poll. >> Whoa. >> Up eight points, Newsom 22 percent.
>> Oh, Shapiro 9 percent, AOC 8 percent. >> Pritzker 7 percent. >> Now, this is likely voter Democrat voters. >> I guess you would have to be right. >> I mean, that's 50, she hit 50.
She hit 50. Vance hasn't even hit 50. He's up six from the last one, listen this for the other side. Vance 48, Trump Junior 18, Rubio 16, Desantis 9, Tucker Carlson 4. >> Rolling.
>> Like I said, we're over two years out.
>> Yeah, yeah, okay, here's the thing.
These respondents are clearly drunk. >> The generic ballot is tied, 50, 50, but it's basically party versus party is the generic ballot. That's right. >> Right.
>> The generic ballot for Congress. >> Right, 50, 50, which normally Democrats are up because they always understand the Republicans. >> Yeah. >> So for Republicans or tied, it means Republicans actually have an advantage.
That's how it's gone and not every vote could be different. But if you look at it overall, that's because not even when Republicans win, they usually are behind Democrats. >> Yeah. >> How did Harris get to 50, seriously, somebody's drinking.
“How many boxes of wine do you have to go through to get her to 50?”
>> Well, I'll tell you. Some is a straight white man, so he cannot be a president. >> Right. >> Shapiro is a straight white Jewish man, he cannot be president with the anti-Semitism on the left.
Absolutely right. They did not select him to run with her for a reason, and we know that's the reason. >> AOC, nobody believes is electable. >> Exactly. And Pritzker is a straight, straight white over 38 waste man.
>> Yes. >> He's not exactly straight, he's a little more round. I wouldn't say straight. >> Okay. He's like a weavers.
>> Yeah. >> And by the way, they, by weavers wobble, but they don't fall down. >> By the way, for those that are seriously criticizing him based on the pictures. That they see of him, they just need to understand the camera adds 400 pounds. So that's not nice for them to do that.
>> So Tucker Carlson has a shot on the Republican side. >> No, you're saying there's a chance.
>> Four percent.
>> Four percent. >> Wow. >> Now, I don't know if they gave a list of people or not. >> Right. Choose some of this list.
>> Right. >> Yeah, okay.
Trump Jr. is at 18 percent, nobody's talking about Trump Jr.
All the talk is Vance Rubio and DeSantis. >> Yes. >> I haven't seen any discussion on Trump Jr. >> Vance naturally because he's the V. And then, or I guess, just wait a minute.
>> Okay. >> Okay. >> I have to make correction here. >> Okay. >> Okay.
>> The national poll is likely voters for President Trump's approval rating. And the generic ballot for the 20, 28 primary, it's registered voters. >> I just found that.
“>> Okay, okay, okay, all right, that's how she gets to 50, right.”
Because we know registered voters drink a lot.
>> I think it's all identity politics and, oh, yeah. >> No, it's been determined. >> No, it is. >> Absolutely. >> You and I go back and I wish we had the show, we could repeat it again.
Well, I mean, it's really out of date. But, and I think it was, I'm kind of about a date. >> It had to be a winter of 2008, right? January maybe, or the, I don't even know, did the primaries begin. Yeah, the primaries had begun.
>> Right. >> I think we had passed Iowa because it was a January. >> Right. >> And we said, we only want Democrats, we want to hear from Democrats. >> Yeah.
>> And who do you want Obama or Hillary? >> Right. [MUSIC] >> Hey there, I'm Paula Pan. I help people make the smartest money decisions possible.
You're not ever worried about your salary. You need enough to make sure that you aren't in a bad financial position. Once you have that, your salary becomes moot.
“What matters from that point forward, upside gains.”
Any type of ownership stake or ownership potential, that's the money. Remember, you can afford anything, just not everything. Afford anything, follow and listen on your favorite platform. >> And we were saying, we were two hours, three hours into it saying, is there anybody on the Democrat side that was calling that had any issue in mind?
Remember how shocked we were? Everyone, every single caller, it was amazing how many people called that night. It was, no, we need the first black man, no, we need the first white woman, no, we need the first black, and the more that would go on, it just continued and continued.
And Eric and I were finally after a couple of hours, just said, my God, this is incredible,
to issues not matter. Does nobody care about where they stand on the issues at all? And then we finally had that one caller who called and said, Obama will stop all the foreign wars. >> No, but it didn't matter.
And then beyond that, once he became the nominee, we had Hollywood types, Opie.
“And others, I'm sorry, Richie Cunningham, Ron Howard, who did these videos?”
And one of them was, it was, with the timings, do one, two. But they would talk about skin color, skin color, skin color, never really talked at all about his qualifications. But what he believed about what he wanted to do, about why he would benefit America by being president, it was all about skin color.
And I have no doubt in this poll here. It is identity politics in a couple of ways. It's a woman of color and the fact that she's a woman. And then beyond that, the whole revenge thing. Because I'm wondering about this the other day, how many believe she didn't get a fair
shot? Well, we know a lot of them do because they set it. Well, she didn't get a fair shot. She only had 170. >> No, I won't.
>> Well, that's where they're mistaken. >> Yes, no, it's absolutely BS. Because her party didn't choose her to begin with.
The primary season of 2020, she was out before 2020.
She stepped out December 3rd, 2019 because she had no support, no money coming in. And her campaign was in shabbles, morale was at an all-time low within her campaign. And so, but people want to live in this delusional mindset that, oh, she would have been great if she had had enough time. If you give her more time, she becomes a greater liability to herself.
Her salad is not going to get you there, and she still has not been able to develop the ability to actually speak and coherent sentences.
“>> And her advertising, you and I remember, I still get at least once a week.”
It's amazing how far people go back on your ex-feed.
I still get probably one or two a week. That was when, almost two years ago, where, remember, we did the show. And I came out and I said, Donald Trump has united the nation. Of all the people to unite the nation, it was Trump because now on every major position that Trump holds now, Harris has endorsed.
>> Yes, because we talked about it. >> Yeah, and the first commercial that had come out, the great uniter, right, the great uniter, Trump is the great uniter because now the leader of the Democrat party has endorsed all of Trump's major positions.
“And in fact, she came out, remember, the first ad, which was within 36 hours of her, you”
know, being, I guess, anointed by the Democratic Polybarrow that, that she put out the
ad where Trump was never up on the border, and she's going to close down the border.
She's going to make sure that illegal immigrants, and it was just, we sat there with our jaws dropped. And then remember after about a month and a half of doing that, she had to start reversing and go, well, no, I don't agree with that. I agree with this, because she, and Democrats were realizing my God, she's just horrible.
And then the debates happened, and she couldn't, well, was it Trump, no, no, was Biden where he just said, I don't know what he said, remember, Biden goes, I don't know idea what he's saying, and we went, wow, and then that was after he, that's when Biden pulled out. Harris was just horrible, horrible, you give her more time, oh, my God, no, it was the
rest. And she didn't go on rogan, because rogan's a three hour, that's, sorry, that's a marathon of a podcast, and as he said, look, we'll talk about anything. And they said, well, we can only do, well, well, they put in place impossible conditions for him to meet, they knew he wouldn't agree to that.
And so that was their way of getting, getting away with not doing it. Yeah, they didn't try, her own campaign, the Democrats, the Politburo of the Democratic Party
“did not trust her to do anything ad lib at all, right?”
Well, again, how do you raise money, this, this delusional mindset, of forgetting for the moment, how bad she is, gets you to the point of the announcement, you know, a few people applauding, but then you've got to get out on the campaign trail and talk again. And she's not capable.
She can't give speeches, she can't do interviews, well, she can, she can never take
questions. If she can do interviews, if there's heavy editing, yeah, you got some great editors, she can nail it, actually even then she didn't think about the 60 minutes thing. When they finally paired down the 60 minutes interview and gave, you know, basically applied an answer where it was clearly edited.
And even then it wasn't good, that was the best they could do.
That's a problem, by the way, Newsom has the same problem in a different way.
He's also not capable of going out and talking coherently about the ideas.
“He thinks he is, he's overly confident, but he comes off as somebody, you know, the”
comments he made the other day about, it was before the White House correspondence dinner
about, you know, good thing, I'm glad to hear that Trump is finally seeing a mentalist,
you know, which, you know, was just weird joke because a mentalist was appearing at the, I suppose to appear the correspondence dinner, but he's just become this joke. He's not someone who comes off as a person who can govern and that's the difference. Tell me, tell me who that is, tell me who in the Democratic Party is capable of governing. Well, they had all, they can't even campaign because they don't know where their own
party is. And so they've got to figure out part of the thing is, how do I answer, I can't answer a question how I truly feel. Right. And I was watching, for example, I was watching,
“you know, some of the debate and you look at Steve Hilton or the sheriff, I just his mind,”
I just got my blank on the sheriff's name. And there's just going, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, right. Because they know exactly what they believe and they're going to say what they believe. And the Democrats have problems. They haven't haul. They actually don't answer the question because they're afraid they don't know what their party will accept. And they can't tell you what they actually think. Okay. That's their great point. They're trying
to figure out where their party is. It's the egg shells. Yeah. They're walking on the egg shells of their party. And you walk on, if you don't get it right, how do you phrase it? You got to phrase it properly. Because the language changes every day. And you know,
how you know that? Because when I was first forced to be a radio talk show host, I didn't
want to give an opinion because I was afraid that I would tick off people. Yeah, you can't do a radio talk show. No, you know, doing that. And I know a few other radio talk show hosts that were in music radio. And that was the hardest thing was to give an opinion. Oh, yeah. To tell people what you really thought. Oh, yeah. Because you were afraid of
“the backlash. Right. To me, that's human nature. Yeah. And that's what's going on there.”
They don't know where their party stands or where their party is going to stand. And so they got to be so careful of what they say or the radicals will come out. We are right
radio brought to you by FPPF, fuel power max. After fuel and owner operators, second biggest
variable cost is tires to save get as much life out of them as possible with good habits, maintain proper inflation. It's free and easy. Yet it's the highest saving maintenance you can perform on the truck. In proper inflation is by far the greatest reason tires fail early. Perform routine maintenance. If a technician can by hand initiate a regular movement in tyrodans, Kingpins, wheel bearings and torque rods, that spells trouble.
Fight irregular wear by replacing suspension components. On the steer axle change your shocks at least as often as you change your tires. On the drive axle replace shocks halfway through the tires life. And when the tires are changed to, finally employ good driving habits. You have full control here. We're conservative driving over rough surfaces helps reduce wear, speeding, hard braking, curbing and tight turns, caused tires to wear fast.
On the other hand, steady acceleration, braking and steering can extend the life, saving a bundle. On our operator business 101 is provided by Overdrive's Partners and Business Program. Go to OverdriveOnline.com to the partners and business section on the website for more details on this and many other topics. Brought to you by Shell Rotella. With advanced synthetic technology is designed to help keep
your rig running with more mileage and less maintenance. We wind up and bore your goals. 866-90-red eye on Red Eye Radio. We're when I'm ready, and he's hurt. I'm hearing that, Tamara. Wow, this was a beautiful from Tim Walls yesterday. On X. If you commit fraud in Minnesota, you're going to get caught. And that's exactly
what we saw today. We catch criminals when state and federal agencies share information, joint investigations work, and securing justice depends on it. Oh, my God. Okay, okay, wait a put on this show.
City miniapolis, come on, City.
We did not help at all in this. Yeah. So City miniapolis made it clear. We're pro fraud.
Exactly. . On our website, Red Eye RadioShow.com, show info with stations, podcasts, and more. Red Eye Radio. We are Red Eye Radio. He's our crawling and I'm carrying Matt Demarrow. Welcome and good morning. Thanks so much for being here. Thank you. This this morning.
All right. I read. I read you up. By the way, you can listen when you choose. And thank you. All right. So I found this interesting yesterday because the debate, the beating points went from yesterday. Who name calls and who throws out
“incendiary rhetoric more, the left or the right to who commits more of the violence?”
I don't know if you saw that evolved yesterday. Yeah. Yeah. And I'm reading even from the post millennial, who says, a tax by far left extreme extremists in US reach a 20 year high, Molotov cocktails the weapon of choice.
Recent data has revealed that for the first time in 20 years, the majority domestic
terror attacks and plots against the United States against the government has come from extreme leftist instead of those from on the right, the revelation follows a number of high profile attacks in 2026 data from the center for strategic and international studies reviewed by the Wall Street Journal has revealed that overall domestic attacks and plots against the US government have hit their highest level since at least 1994 of the 20
attacks and plots recorded in 2025, 10 were categorized by the the center as originally from the extreme left, eight came from the extreme right. Okay. So it's 10 to eight. This is really interesting because it's something that we've talked about before and we in fact we talked about it yesterday. We talked about for example, the southern poverty law center had defined racism. So they expanded the definition of racism and then they started sending money to the racist.
Yes. The racist leaders. Right. And so they were viewed for such a long time and used as the
“arbiter. They were the ones that decided what was hate. Remember Ben Carson was on the list and they”
had to remove him. Right. And all of a sudden it went from hate to, well, okay, we disagree with your religion on this and this makes you a hate mind work. Right. And it was like, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. We said the same thing about fact checking. When nobody was believing the mainstream media anymore, they said, well, we're going to create fact checkers. The fact checkers will prove to you that we're telling the truth. Well, the fact checkers, so many of them ended up in so many cases to actually
be just political leftist activists who even in their explanation as we would go point by point
by point on it. Sometimes they'd get it right. But when they got it wrong, it was always in favor
and the information that they left out made it seem like the right might have been wrong on it. When it was actually left. Right. Right. When through that point by point by point, remember the the Pinocchio's on the wall and the Washington Post. Yeah. And so the fact checking, you notice fact checking isn't really around anymore. No, because the people figured out, well, the fact checking is BS. The fact checking is just pretending we have another layer which is examining what's going on.
And it wasn't. It was just another propaganda arm. Well, the former leftist who now, I mean, I don't know where she labels herself now, but you see her a lot. And if you see her on CNN or News Nation or whatever, you'd probably say, oh, she's just another Republican surrogate. And she's not. We're talking about a Betcha Unger surrogate who was only five years ago where she started evolving. And anti-Semitism was one of the reasons that initially got her to say Democratic
Party, I'm no longer a part of you. Right. So she's one of those that over the last five or six years has been many of them. We haven't mentioned her a lot that that have moved to the right because they see the major problems with the left, including the racism. I would love to have the
“conversation with her about, okay, what were you thinking then? What was going to your mind then?”
What were your thoughts then? What was that turning point? That spark, that threshold,
With her, I think Michael Rappaport has, you know, made it clear.
and, you know, found out all the lies that Democrats were telling about Trump. But I would love
to sit down with them and say, you know, seriously, what was going through your mind? You know, because if you're believing what they back then at that point, you were believing their hype or their lies, why is that? But, and this is really interesting because she's on news nation, and apparently she was having to debate a little bit with her, with her all the Rivera who was on this Katie Pavlovich's show and she did the research and she looked at the
organization, for example, at the Wall Street Journal, is looking at and saying, well, yeah, you know, it may be 10 to 8, but that's even exaggerated because they left out this, they left out this, they left out this, they left out this, they left out this. So somebody comes up with an organization
“that's supposed to police this and they're not. Yeah. And that's what she says here,”
and I want to play the beginning where she, where she talks to her, her all looks. I found it funny, but here we go. Her all to brought up this idea that the left and the right are equal when it comes to call survivalants or acts of violence. You have done an amazing job of digging through the data, and what did you find? All right, so her all to see if you find this compelling. Okay. So it seems to me that there are three main sources that you hear a lot from the mainstream media
that allegedly prove that the problem we have right now for political violence is both sides problem. There's the Cato Institute, there's the prosecution project out of the University of Cincinnati, and then there's the Center for Strategic and International Studies. And these are
all always shared by the likes of the economists to the Wall Street Journal today shared,
“said to for strategic and international studies. The problem is is when you dig down into that data,”
it is so deeply flawed. Let me just give you a few examples. Okay. The prosecution projects supposed to list all of the acts of political violence in America does not list Charlie Kirk's assassination, does not list Trump's assassination attempts, does not list any George Floyd violence. 24 Americans lost their lives during those riots, not listed, but every white nationalist who's a drug dealer that gets listed. So they list 33 white areas, uh, area nation people who had a
meth lab, this is political violence because they happen to be white nationalists. All right, Cato does not list the 9/11 victims, does not list any George Floyd violence, Center for Strategic and International Studies. Where does it get its data from? The ADL, highly partisan, and the Southern, which just was revealed to have allegedly been funding the very
racist that they were supposed to be fighting. And finally, I just have to mention this, the Center
for Strategic and International Studies, has in its methodology section. It says, all anti-Semitism is right wing. Any attacks on Jews or Jewish institutions, they reclassified it if it was in the name of Palestinians, they reclassified it as ethno-nationalist. So by their definition, there's no such thing as left wing anti-Semitism, which we all know is just nonsense. This is the data, it is flawed, shame on the Wall Street Journal, and shame on the economists, because they're giving
a flawed view, and I totally agree with Katie, it would be so nice to say, Kumbayao, we all share the problem. You cannot fix a problem if you are lying about what it is. And she said they got cut off, but it was the Southern poverty law Center. She was saying, that's where they get their statistics from. And so it's the same thing. It's the same thing as as fact check, the fact checkers, there's no difference. It's flawed. They're political entities that are attempting to make a point,
and even then the number of instances still the left, you know, the left leads on it. But it was interesting where they said, you know, white area nations that have met labs that get busted for having a met lab that's considered an act of violence. Well, of domestic violence, which I found interesting, I'll have to look into that one to see where she got that because they're interested in that one. Yeah. I got it. But understand, remember,
she was a lefty just a few years ago. And you and I had questions as
“her evolution happened again, what I mentioned a moment ago. What were you thinking then?”
Because if you think about what she's saying about how the left reacts and what they do, well, what were you doing then? And what was going through your mind? What was your motivation then?
I announced that I want a criticizer.
You know, because it seems when it comes to activists or the radical left,
their brain is totally different. Well, for example, we could look at it and you know, because Jonathan Turley now is considered a right winger. But yeah, right. Turley sits here and says, I look at the constitution of what it says. You know, you know, you know, now, think about this.
“Were you gone when this happened? Did we talk about it together?”
Alan Dursherwitz becoming a Republican? Yeah, we talked. You were okay. Yeah. I still
that that shocked me more than the UAE pulling out of OPEC.
I went as I live and breathe in my home going on soon to be four decades in talk radio. If you would have ever told me in the very beginning, by the way, some day Alan Dursherwitz is going to reject the Democratic Party because of their anti-Semitism and become a Republican, I would say, huh? No, that's not going to happen. He was you just so far left. But when you look at, for example, I understand a Dursherwitz and I can and Turley, I understand because it's not that
he's become a Republican, it's just he looks at the constitution, whether we're the Democrats don't anymore. And if you look at a mad TIEB, a mad Shellumberger, uh, women, is it? Matt? Yeah. Michael, Michael Shellumberger. Yeah, Matt TIEB, Michael Shellumberger, you know, Barry Weiss, so much of theirs. I mean, you look at it TIEB and Shellumberger, probably Barry Weiss too. I think what really shocked them. They could not believe the FBI's involvement in censoring of social media.
I think that scared the daylights out of them. I wish somebody would ask them that direct
“question because that's what I always got out of it. They were blown away by what happened.”
And then it wasn't a Shellumberger where the Biden administration, the FBI went to his house when he was testifying, yeah, to talk about the fact that the day of his testimony, they were at his door. He wasn't there, but they were at his door. Remember they said it was something about a refund or something? Yeah, something like that. You know, it was an FBI agency for refund, but uh, but the, and I think the FBI or IRS, I'm a probably IRS, yeah, and then you had Barry Weiss, I think, she from being
in the media and actually working in the liberal media, I think she probably had what Bernard Goldberg had. They saw the, that it was an awakening, an awakening that it was a political activism. I would agree. That it, that it, that it, that it was in journalism and they wanted to get back
to journalistic practices. But their critical thinkers, and you know, she wrote at one point,
and I think the title of her post was, or article was, I was wrong about Trump, something along those lines. And it, it wasn't that she was becoming a conservative. What she was pointing out was everything that she got wrong about him. I'm not saying she's, you know, wearing a
“mag ahead around the CBS office, although it'd be funny as long as that happened. That's what the”
left believes, that that's exactly what they believe. And because if you question anything, if we've always said this, that we said this all along, you become the oppressor, the moment, you're not carrying the torch, the moment you're not angry, the moment you're not acting out, so the moment you have silent silence and don't agree with them. Right. You've, but you've got to go the full measure. If you even start asking questions, you are now the enemy. We are
right, I radio. We'll be right back with more red eye radio with every currently and Gary McNamara. We're when I radio, he's here. I'm Gary McNamara. I'm telling you the thing, I'm still shocked. I mean, some stories, and I know the mainstream media doesn't look at the same way. And again, they're probably the most of people who are not my age, but the UAE pulling out of OPEC was just huge. That's a match today. And I just wonder, what's the response going to be, what are we going to hear
From Saudi Arabia over the next couple of days?
undermine the future of OPEC. It certainly undermines the impact. Well, it does the UAW look at this.
And when we know, I mean, we look at Dubai, we know there is an effort in the UAE to become an
“international place to go. I mean, that's why Dubai, that's why they have the biggest skyscraper”
all of that, which means they understand they have to diversify. Right. And so is a time for them to say,
look, we can make a huge profit. Let's sell our oil now. Right. And we're diversifying anyway, and do they look at the United States? You know, they produce what, uh, I think three and a
“half million barrels a day. They could up at the five. Well, we're at 13.6 million barrels a day”
here in the United States. And we can go way higher than that over the next five years if we
exactly, if we wish to, and then oil becomes a much cheaper commodity, which would benefit the entire world economically speaking. Right. Exactly. This is Ridae Radio on Westwood One. Vince Conez is redefining news talk. Come Vince Conez hosts of the Vince podcast. I'm bringing you the truth beneath the headlines of all of the nation's top stories, in-depth interviews. We feature newsmaking interviews with
the top guests on the whole planet. And I'll ask the questions, you only dream of other
“interviewers asking. And a front row seat to the most important conversations of the day.”
This is a show with an obsessive focus on what's good for America. You are going to love Vince. The Vince show. Follow and listen on your favorite platform. $60. Stacking Benjamin's. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.
