Red Eye Radio
Red Eye Radio

06-24-26 Part Two - Antifa Ruling in Texas

4h ago37:554,854 words
0:000:00

In part two of Red Eye Radio with Gary McNamara and Eric Harley, eight protesters accused by the Justice Department of having ties to antifa were sentenced Tuesday to decades in federal prison over a...

Transcript

EN

More Feuer, more intrigued than the Dragon Keren zurück.

The absolute macht is the one who has to live.

Your Reich will be unbezzling what is in the ring.

Stream the new Staffel, House of the Dragon, at 22nd June, with Woho, a member of Staffel 1 and 2 of the previous series, and a member of the Highlights.

It's not a second question.

I'm going to tell you the truth. The best price for the best price. Now at 2 or 8 90 months. Gear of Worte Faudi, streaming was not so good. Now, it's Red Eye Radio, Gary McNamara,

and Eric Hurley, talk about everything from Father Tics to Social Issues, and News of the Day, whether you're up late or you're just starting your day. Welcome to the show from the Relief Fector Studios. This is Red Eye Radio.

All the cross-America, we are Red Eye Radio. He is Eric Hurley and I'm Gary McNamara. Good morning. Thank you so much for being here. Thank you.

This really didn't get as much publicity as it should have yesterday.

Yeah.

A Texas Court sentence eight individuals were found guilty earlier

of this year of attacking a federal immigration facility in Texas to multiple decades in prison. Benjamin Song, the leader of the Antifa group, was sentenced to 100 years behind bars for his role in the attack on the Prairie Land Attention Center

in El Vereto last 4th of July. Remember that? Not too far from where I live. Right. Hop, skipping a jump.

The defendants who were convicted on terrorism charges in March, set off fireworks and vandalized vehicles outside the detention facility, and then open fire run responding officers in what prosecutors described as a planned ambush. Song, who was convicted of shooting the police officer,

received the longest sentence followed by Maricela Rudo,

who was sentenced to 70 years, Autumn Hill, who was sentenced to 50 years, along with Zachary Evit, Savannah Baton, Megan Morse, Elizabeth Soto, Daniel Orlando, Sanchez, Estrada, were sentenced to 30 years.

A ninth member of the group is set to be sentenced on July 1st. Prosecutors alleged that all individuals are connected to Antifa. The decentralized far left organization that President Trump designated as a domestic terrorist organization in 2025.

The attackers drew on radical left ideology as a spray painted police cars with ice pig and possessed flags that red fight fascism fight the oligarchy. So there you go. The Washington Post reported that Song and Hill lived in a house in Dallas

with several trans identifying left-wing activists who were part of the local Antifa cell the Washington Post reported. Song leveraged his military and martial arts background to train his roommates and other Dallas and Tifa members in close quarters combat according to prosecutors

when police rated the house that Song and Hill lived in. They recovered firearms. Song's attorney insisted outside the courthouse

that it was never intended that anybody get hurt.

Are you kidding me? Are you kidding me? That's like the other case that's going to be appealed. I got my black hair. Austin murder.

The McKinney. Yeah. The McKinney football. Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. The Austin Metcap.

Yeah, yeah, thank you. Yeah, the attorney's coming into appeal. And they're going to try to make it a race issue. Well, which started right after the sentencing. Right.

Outside the courtroom. That started by family members. And, you know, that it was. Again, you're not going to. They're going to try, but you're not going to.

You're not going to win this. It was a very clear case. And the jury found that. Well, when when I when I saw it yesterday and here's a story. A group of well known civil rights and criminal defense attorneys announced Monday

that they're representative Carmelo Anthony. Any pro bono in the appeal according to the announcement is appeal team.

We'll include a number of civil rights lawyers.

Our appellate team has been retained following the conviction.

To conduct a fresh independent review of the trial record.

The group said we recognize a profound law suffered by one young man's family. And uncertainty facing another. We extend our respect. Our responsibilities determine whether legal error occurred and to ensure that every. Supported by the record is fully and vigorously presented on appeal.

You and I both know where this is going. Yeah. Yep. Meditian yoga joggen. I don't think it's fun.

Really? I think it's fun. My story is brutal. Stoyer? How do you feel?

The story is real? Yeah. I've been talking about 1000 euros. Do you have any connections? No.

Just like Stoyer app. Wow. And that's easy.

But of course, the market is almost all automatic.

Finally, I feel so exciting.

Hold your money. Tie it with visu steuer. Café in your best form. With Cuba, every café on Knofftruck is at the same time. With the new Cuba-Wan Capsule machine from Chibu,

a famous café from special businesses. Full-monicky Aromas, thanks to innovative press brutality and over 17-storey café for every business. Aléba Premium Café from up 29 euros. And there can now be Cuba-Capsule machine

in Diner Chibu-Fiale and of Chibu-Dee. And it's last week the evidence from the murder trial was released. When you see it in its totality, when you see the evidence here, I don't know of any other. This is as clear cut of a legitimate conviction

as you could possibly get. It wasn't about race, as we all know.

And we all know, first thing I saw,

well, this is going to be impossible. You're not going to be able to this. This case was slammed dunk. The only reason you're doing this if you're left is civil rights attorneys is one reason and one reason only.

And this is to make it a try to make it a racial issue. When it is not. Right. And it's not going to work. Inside the courtroom, the evidence stays the same.

The witnesses don't waver. But yes. But when you think about this, how shocking it was when this happened. And we've had other, the last incident that was done,

you know, the one we talked about a week ago. You've got groups that are being organized online. Yeah. To commit murder and act of terror. According to the authorities.

And that was the, this group in Texas mad online. Yep. Yep. And I'm so glad that they threw the book in them. Oh, yeah.

You know, he was, they didn't, they didn't capture him for what? Week or two? It was days before they got him. I was surprised.

He was still in Dallas. But he was. They found him in North Dallas. When they captured him. And yeah.

And in case people don't know what, what they were, the plan. The plan. I love the defense attorney. There was.

They didn't intend for anybody to get hurt. Are you kidding me? Right. They were carrying protest signs. They were carrying guns.

But it was, the loaded gun's here. We're simply symbolic. Yeah. Of the, of the, of the, of a pression of the,

the, the ice men. Who's the defense attorney? Alvin Bragg. We all know what they did. They went vandalized it.

And they wanted, they wanted the, They wanted the, they wanted them out. So they could, so they, so they, so they, Exactly. We all know what they were attempting to do. What not, what tempting what they did. What they what they accomplish and what they did. Luckily that one local officer wasn't killed right. And, you know, this should have been all over the news that these convictions were done. When you think about it, and any other time in our history, if something like that happened.

Yeah, it would be major news. Oh, my gosh. Yeah. Mainstream media. I got to cover it. Right.

And it's important to know they were convicted and got severe jail sentences for doing it. Yep.

Because you think about it, who just meets online? Well, this is an end talk about it. And then it starts talking about committing acts of terrorism. That, you know, we talked about conspiracy versus similar mindset. And sometimes it involves conspiracy.

The similar mindset to get a group of people who would all agree to take lives.

And they didn't know each other before and, you know, according to authorities, they met online, which tells you how widespread this is.

And we have seen, yeah, you had a couple of them, though, that we're all together beforehand. Right. They met, they met as a group online. Right.

And so, if you're talking about how many examples, assassination of Charlie Kirk, multiple assassination attempts of the current president. The UFC. Yeah, you got to see. That was. Yeah. And the UFC plot reminds me a lot of this. It's also not getting enough attention. I do see it. But it's, you know, you've got to look at what and this is something to do. No, this is, this is what they do. This is how they, it is not any more showing up with protest science. Like it's a DUI or something. Right. A lot to DUI's happens. Right.

And for them, for the people who are responsible for doing this or attempting this, it's normal for them to do it.

They feel like it's okay. Gunning down Brian Thompson and cold blood, yep, acceptable, acceptable. Right.

We'll just, we'll, we'll twist this anyway we can. And instantly, the man they say, shop Brian Thompson becomes a hero for the left. It's grotesque. But it's exactly where their mindset is because, as I've said, if you don't value life from the beginning, you won't value life anywhere along the way. And they don't. It's okay to take a life. But I'm just glad that I'm just very, very happy that that solid sentences were handed out.

Yeah, yeah, you know, across the board. Yep. And the, the, if you look at the, the original organizers of it, yeah, all of them got, you know, 50 years or more.

Yeah, good to the leader who got 100 years 100 years. Yep, good, which means hopefully he never gets out or when the others get out, they'll be, they'll be elderly.

But it's not, I mean, it's just not, it's just not acceptable. And that's the thing that bothers me and, and you look at, you know, the, the evidence of becoming acceptable and you look at Brian Thompson. Yeah, yeah, the healthcare executive. Right. Yep. And you talk about, you know, what, you want to know where the Democrat Socialists of America are going, it was AOC.

I see said it. Well, yeah, it's wrong, but you have to understand that when a claim is denied, people view that as an act of violence.

That's what she said. She justified it.

Where, as we know, if you're dealing with an insurance company, you always have recourse in civil court.

Right. Yep. You have, you have a recourse. Right. Because the, the thing was not, it wasn't, it wasn't a specific case of, you denied, you denied me something that was in the contract. Right. It's simply, if insurance companies deny something, that's a crime, irrespective of whether you have it in the contract or not. Right. And simply, if we don't get everything that we want, then murder is justified.

Yeah. And murder is sexy. Well, no for them being a hero. Look at the smarts on their faces when they're in courtrooms. Man, she only thinks he's a rock star.

You know, I, as I've said before, I would never commit a crime, because it's wrong. But more importantly, I'm in the system.

Facial recognition, they will catch me. And I've said before that no, I really wouldn't want a murder because it's so hard. I know a lot of comedians have done that one. Murder is hard. But now that, you know, hey, you know, on the chicks front lately, I'll give me a couple of dates.

Well, if you'd like blue hair, and I don't mean like in your age group blue h...

Yeah. Younger with blue hair. So Gary, what you're saying is you're looking for insane women.

Well, they can be fun. Well, no, but seriously, it's serious.

They become, they, they honestly do create heroes. They cheer each other in these moments.

Where's the outrage? You know, of the taking of lives or the attempting of taking the lives? Where is the outrage? People just blink and look away. Well, you know, it was an insurance company. Well, you know, it is ice. Yeah. Yeah. How are you talking about? No, I mean, it has become totally insane in the case of Charlie Kirk.

He's a guy who was having for bed talking.

Yeah. That's all he ever did. Yeah. It's talked. That's it. Words. And I loved the people on the left that said, well, you know, he was quite comfortable.

So are you, who is, who isn't, who isn't in the media? You and I talk about this all the time. You and I talk about, I don't believe I hold one radical position. No. But as we know, there are people that view the fact that we don't have radical positions as the evidence that we're radical.

No matter you're not on my side, you're radical. And therefore your life doesn't count as much as mine, right? No, that's their mindset. We are right. I radio brought to you by FPPF fuel power max. Least owner operator should be aware of four common revenue myths.

Myth one concentrate on increasing revenue because costs will take care of themselves. Myth two, more revenue per mile is the answer to all problems. The revenue per mile really doesn't change much from company to company.

Myth three, all you have to do to be successful is run a lot of miles.

In reality, revenue is only half of the profit equation. Myth four, you can tell how well you're doing by the size of your settlement check. The settlement check is only a part of the success picture. Miles Driven loads hauled conditions, mechanical problems, time off, and especially costs all have to be considered. Owner operator business 101 is provided by overdrive partners in business program.

Go to overdriveonline.com to the partners in business section of the website for more details on this and many other topics. Throught to you by Shell Rotella with advanced synthetic technology is designed to help keep your rig running with more mileage and less maintenance. Get in touch with what I radio, toll free at 866, my dear I. [Music] We are running radio.

He is there currently and I'm Gary McNamara. And this little button area here is the on and off button.

Yeah, that's what that does turn the microphone on so people can actually hear you.

You're ready for audio kind of the day, got to play it one more time. All right, because it's like, this isn't like New York City where the Democrat Socialists of America are just like, Hey, United States sucks, let's destroy it. You got like Talarico here in Texas trying to ride the fine line. Yeah, all right, so here we go.

Here's the latest that the Republicans are using against him.

Yeah, and that's, you know, I always think of myself as a Christian who hates Christianity.

[Laughter] Now the only thing, the only thing that that would make sense on, you know, to have that kind of explanation, right, would be for me to say something like, I'm a Buffalo Bills fan who hates the bills. No, that I get because I never want to super pull. That I get.

That I certainly understand. Yeah, and many people would not accept that explanation from me either. Yeah, probably not, but it's just, it's hilarious because I don't know when he said it.

I know that the fox headline was hilarious.

And I just, I just, I died laughing because of how they were trying to find it.

I got it my pile of stuff here. Oh, there's another thing that he said.

He said his imagination, Talarico says his imagination is limited by his white maelness.

That's the other thing. We'll have that coming up next. Trump promoting national constitutional theory. Uh-oh. And navigating the Bazzaro's fair every night, every currently in Gary McNamara.

Red, I, radio.

And he is currently in I'm Gary McNamara.

Welcome to Good Morning, download our run-out radio app and listen when you choose. All right, so there it is. Talarico says he hates Christianity in unearth interview with a transgender Latinx Theologian.

I'll just happen a couple of years ago when he did the interview.

But it also relates. And we said, wow, these. He's hi-finated labels now, but he's come up with the ultimate one. A Christian who hates Christianity is what Talarico said he was. But this was in the same interview.

Yeah, Texas Democratic Senate, the hopeful James Talarico. One said that the trans queer Latinx activist Theologian was a major source of inspiration for his political philosophy. In praising Roberto Esponosa. Talarico said, I told you I was a boring straight cis white man and added press material to spice it up. My imagination is also just limited by my own background and identity.

In 2020, Talarico said, white skin gives me and every white American immunity from the virus.

But we spread it wherever we go through our words, our actions and our system. We don't have to be showing symptoms like a white hood or a Confederate flag to be contagious. The only cure is diagnosing the virus within ourselves and taking dramatic actions.

To contain the spread he said, the first small step is for claiming loudly and unequivilly that black lives matter.

He later said that his anti-white comments were taken out of context. It's now backing off on all of this, but it's like, sorry, it doesn't work. All I have to say is, what a confused young man. He seems very confused. He seems like a confused, not case.

I want to go with him to a barbecue place and ask for the vegan plate. That was still hilarious, though. I'm not a vegan. Look at me here. I'm eating meat here.

No. You're the one that wanted your campaign to go vegan. You said it. Then I want to take him to church and have him talk to the pastor about how he hates Christianity. There's a bunch of these left wing churches that really aren't churches.

They're just okay. You know what that means when he says this. When he says, I'm a Christian who hates Christianity. He's saying, I want to change Christianity. He doesn't believe in it.

That's what it means. I want Christianity to evolve to my beliefs. He's saying the Bible is wrong. I just want to take the popcorn while he tells that to the pastor for the Pope or anybody else. So here we go.

Trump said yesterday that his administration is working on a national right to carry legislation. A comment that could signal White House support for a proposal that would dramatically expand firearm carry rights across the United States. While speaking in Pennsylvania, he recognized national rifle association president Bill Bakkenberg in the crowd.

Saying the organization has endorsed him since the beginning because he saved...

Trump then asked the attendees whether they supported national right to carry legislation before adding. Yeah, we're working on it. You know what's interesting.

If you would have ever told me because the gun control movement when I first became a radio talk show host in 89 and the early 90s was as strong as it ever was.

Oh, yeah. It really was. Yeah, if you would have ever told me that by the time, you know, that I went from a young man to an old codger. Yeah, that you would have 29 states with constitutional carry. I would have said no way.

Yeah, isn't that amazing. That with all of the rhetoric about gun control that 29 states, the majority of states have constitutional carry. It really is. I mean, it's it's it's it's unbelievable. It's it's good.

It's great. It's great.

I never thought it would happen.

Not that many. No, neither did I. And. And so. What I what I wonder is that this is this is a constitutional legal question that sits in the back of my mind.

For example, freedom of speech is set really by, you know, it's because it's been tested so much by the Supreme Court. Yeah. And we have it all the time, if you try to, if you try to violate it, they'll come after you. Same with civil rights. Sometimes the second amendment is treated like.

Quote abortion rights, I put that in quotes. And it's where, okay, the states can do what they want.

And I'm like, why for the second amendment? Why isn't there a standard unless this is what Trump is after?

Pass this bill sent into the Supreme Court. Because it's not because I know a lot of states would say, no, we get to set. No, you don't. I'm federal rights. You do not get to, you, you don't get to set it.

Right. You know, when you look at the, when you look for example. At a legal search and seizure, the Supreme Court has set. That, for example, DUI roadblocks are okay as long as you stop everything. You can't pick and choose long as you stop everybody.

But there are states that have said, no, we're going to, we're going to go beyond that. You know, we're, we're going to sit there and say, no, we're not going to have. You, you can't have a roadblock. States have said that violates their constitution. Right.

They're technically giving you more rights than has been set out by the Supreme Court in legal press. Right. And that's where I look at the second amendment. The second amendment is not abortion, for example.

There was never any legislation to pass abortion.

Abortion does not exist anywhere in the bill of rights. Right. As we know. And the Supreme Court said, you know, when, and, and the, the left, lied or is clueless about what they said, they're, they're, they're fascist.

No, they're not. They weren't fascist in the Dobbs decision at all. No. What they said was the last Supreme Court saying abortion should be legal. Created law that does not exist.

Right. There's been no federal government legislation to legalize abortion. And if there isn't, and if it doesn't appear in the constitution, you can't say constitutionally you have that right. When it doesn't exist is not mentioned, you can't do that.

Second amendment's different.

It's mentioned. It's the second amendment. Yep.

That's how you know it's mentioned, because it's called the second amendment.

Right. Which specifically is about that now. It doesn't go into details, which is where the courts come in. But I look at it, and I just say, if you look at the president that has been set over certain rights where it becomes a law of the land, what the standard is.

And we've talked about the standard in different constitutional issues. Why isn't there one on the second amendment? We know you can't completely ban guns. But does if Trump, if they could pass this and get this passed,

I have constitutional carry.

And then, of course, the left will fight it. It goes to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court says it's constitutional.

Is the Supreme Court saying the laws constitutional?

Or the second amendment says this is a minimum standard.

How do you get to that? And by the way, I know I'm jumping here and there on this because this just popped into my mind a little while ago. When I saw it, well, before the show. So there's a lot of questions that I have. Probably a lot of legal things that I haven't thought of that might put a spoke in my argument,

or put something in between the spokes of my argument. No, maybe. But does that make sense? Yeah. When I say, you know, because it's so clear the second amendment exists.

Other things that we say are rights don't exist. Well, you know, not we, we don't say it. Others. Right. Well, and that's it.

I think the intent by the administration is to have the Supreme Court hash this out. Because there's no other ruling if they're because there will be a challenge set of challenges. I'm just guessing, I don't know, out of the thin blue Illinois, New York, California. And their attorneys general will all file cases. And it can't be anything but abroad ruling.

If the Supreme Court takes that up, which I think they would. Well, they could simply say that law is constitutional and not make a overall broad assumption. That we, you know, that there's a minimum standard that all states have to uphold.

Based on based on their interpretation of the second amendment, they would be low simply to be saying, this law is legal.

Right, which would be a broad rule. Yes, it would be. It, well, it would be, I was just looking at it. Yeah, I was looking at it all. It wouldn't be just one particular case.

It would say this law is legal. And so it applies. Well, it would be a broad ruling on the law that the law applies to everyone. Right. It's not a broad ruling on actually the constitutionality of the second amendment.

It would be a broad ruling that that is constitutional to have. Yeah, carry across the nation for the law, for the law itself, for that law itself. And, man, I can't wait. The question is, can you get it done? Here's an interesting thing, just politically.

All the 29 states that have constitutional carry has been a massive increase in shootings. I have not seen any, I haven't heard that. You said argument. Yeah. Yeah, I haven't seen any data, says that.

No, I mean, think about in the wake of mass shootings, what has happened? What have we seen in modern years and recent years since you and I have been doing this? More and more people who support the second amendment. Yeah. Whether they practice their second amendment rights or not.

Well, because it makes, you know, why self-interest it makes sense. Yeah. I don't want you to have a gun, but I should have a gun, so I can protect myself. Right. Why?

Because cops can't, well, that's what the cops are there for.

Now, here's the thing about the Democrat socialist of America.

Now they want to get rid of the cops. They want to get rid of all the cops. Yeah. So are they not by default saying everybody should be armed? Or do we just, just let the criminals win?

Well, I think it's, you know, what I said yesterday and that is, they'll have their police. Oh, no. Yeah. All right. Now I'm thinking demolition man or the Germans call them the Gestapo.

Okay. New Fallon line or else. Oh, Platner's Army. Yeah. Exactly.

Platner's law enforcement force. Yeah. At Fort Platner.

That's what they'll, that's what they'll be training for.

Or Platner. See. Oh, my gosh. Ugh. Yeah.

We are Red Eye Radio. Coming up more with Gary McNamara and Eric Harley. It's Red Eye Radio. We are Red Eye Radio.

These are currently not Gary McNamara.

All right.

That was funny that Ron came up with about James Telerico who said he's, yeah.

He's a Christian who hates Christianity.

So, therefore, he's the Antichrist. Well, I mean, technically. And that's what we're talking about. He's a Christian who hates Christianity. Yeah.

You're the Antichrist. Yeah. Why?

I do they listen to themselves talking.

It's just weird. It's just bizarre. And they're winning. They're winning elections. Seriously.

Yep.

I don't know if the problem is that we legalized it.

Or that we didn't legalize it enough. Whatever that means. Because it is just gotten so bizarre politically. If you're thinking about getting into a political war room for the Democrats. Where do you start?

What do you sit down with? Okay.

Here's what we're doing now.

How do you get even more and more radical?

They will. They have. They have. And they do it all the time. My brain just won't get there.

I don't know what's next. Wow. Well, whatever it is, it won't surprise us. It won't surprise us for sure. [Music]

This is Red Eye Radio. On Westwood One.

Compare and Explore