Red Eye Radio
Red Eye Radio

07-29-26 Part Two - The Fauci Files

3h ago37:565,848 words
0:000:00

In part two of Red Eye Radio with Gary McNamara and Eric Harley, we focus on the lack of media coverage of Dr. Anthony Fauci's diary, now made public and today's Senate hearings on Capital Hill where...

Transcript

EN

By Aldi there's a price for all of them.

This week, the Great Bower Fruchtio Gord, 250 grams for 39 cents.

Or Gerol Steiner Mineral Wasser, 1,5 liters for only 75 cents. And the weight of the boat in your Aldi Nord. Aldi, good for all of them. Now, it's Rennai Radio. Gary McNamara and Eric Hurley talk about everything from politics to social issues.

And news of the day, whether you're up late or you're just starting your day. Welcome to the show from the Relief Factor Studios. This is Rithi Radio. All across America, we are running radio. He is her crony and I'm Gary McNamara.

You know, we started a Monday show, one of the things that we said is, wow. There's not a peak out of the mainstream media about the Fauci diaries. Nothing. And it's like they're just, they're pretty damning. They're in his own words and you can take what he said then and what he said privately.

And you can obviously see the difference that he wasn't telling the American public the truth on a number of particular issues out there. I did find this. This is some Fox News yesterday where they actually looked and monitored from, I think it was Saturday, Sunday, and Monday to see how much the networks were covering it.

But first, they they played a collage of what it used to be, the love fest with Fauci

from the mainstream media. Here we go. Often been the subject of a fawning coverage from mainstream news networks. There's a flashback. Dr. Anthony Fauci, American hero and New York Yankee fan with me now is Dr. Anthony Fauci.

The American's favorite doctor. The head and the heart that comes together in your body is the real deal, Dr. Fauci.

And that's why people believe in you, Dr. Fauci.

I know you're one of the busiest scientists in the country right now. It is an honor to have some of your time. We see you as well as a hero, Dr. Fauci. Thanks so much for your time. How is it that it is your birthday tomorrow?

But we here at CBSN got the gift.

We got to talk to you. Saturday Night Live is back this weekend. After a month of being off, what do you think the chances are that somebody will portray you? Yeah, here we go.

Wow. It's not done yet, guys. We're not done with the audio cut. Okay. I got it.

We start this here because the important part's coming up. Okay. All right. Here we go. How times have changed for the legacy media.

The new revelations from Fauci's diary has been completely ignored by CNN, MSNow, ABC and NBC, and as of last night, CBS spent just 24 seconds on it. Okay. This is Saturday through Monday, CNN, zero minutes, MSNow, zero, ABC, zero, NBC, zero, CBS, excuse me.

Barry Weiss, 24 seconds. Yeah.

Why would that be when you have the media that will be, this is how you have to judge

us. You don't sit there and say, I can't believe they're not, it's like, well, of course, they're not. Yeah. They view the diary, what's in the diary, as so destructive towards the history of what

we were told during COVID by Fauci, remember, these are the same people that will defend the radical transgender movement and try to make the case that a man can be a woman if the man says so, but they're not here defending Dr. Fauci, right? That's how damaging it is. They invested so heavily, you know, yeah, and the adoration part of it.

And that's what built, helped to build that ego that was probably already there. And that, you can't back away from those clips you just heard, sound weird. Oh, don't they? They just sound weird, introduce some, who is name and title, ask the questions, right? And get straight to the question.

Yes, because you could, you could feel in here and see the idolatry, well, what were

you expecting that he was going to call you after the interview and invite you to dinner?

A hero. You're a hero. You're a hero. You're a great day's tomorrow. Today, we get the gift.

What? What? Well, remember, weren't those the times of, uh, uh, oh, not the mooch, uh, watch, watch, come

On the guy who, uh, the guy who's in prison now, who you should run for presi...

Oh, uh, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, I got my, uh, uh, oh, what's the day in the lawyer? Yeah, and then Eddie. Yeah, I remember. Yeah, I remember. Yeah.

Scrolling with Hayland.

I am Hayland, I am Hayland, I scrolled with the homies here in the live chat because

there was a lot to scroll through on X on Instagram on TikTok or cutting through the clutter. One hot take at a time. I'll see you all in the chat before the show. I tried to jump in just a few minutes before to say hello. I love the chat interaction.

Thank you for helping. But I do it to get all of the videos and all of the content that you won't find anywhere else. Scrolling with Hayland. Just search that up, and I will be there.

Follow and listen on your favorite platform. Jim Rome takes on sports.

I will always have a complicated relationship with this game.

But people evolve to do sports. Do not make me regret this. Do not make me devolve back to that guy that's so many clones which I still was. And do not embarrass the entire country. Now, I can go back.

I can get there fast, lose tonight, and you got a real problem.

Do not blow it. The Jim Rome show podcast. You've been warned. If I would listen on your favorite platform. No, it's the same as the relationship.

That's the problem that blows up in your face. Well, and what was the idea behind it? Why such adoration? Because he wasn't Trump.

Because they could take him and they all, you know, they're always carving out someone

that may have worked under Trump for a few minutes. And then there no longer under Trump. And his tone changed after Trump was no longer president. Finally, you could see how much he adored himself, how much the adoration was fueling all of that ego.

I had no doubt in my mind what was going on. We've seen this before. They did the same with John Bolton, you know, oh, a tall book. Tell us more. And this is, you know, this is what the media does.

And investing that much in adoration, this has to be very embarrassing for them. They, they, I don't think the care enough to be embarrassed. They just move on. Is it nothing ever happened? Yeah.

I would say the same thing. They don't have shame when they're wrong. Right. All they wish to do is not cover it because it's damaging to the narrative that they still wish to hold, and, you know, they, they back this, they back this narrative as we said

before, they just move on. They're political activists. It's not, and this is one thing that we had, had said to the conservative politicians. This goes all the way back to Robert Mueller. We hope that the media now learns their lesson and understands it.

Stop it. Yeah. Yeah. No, they move on to the next thing. They're not embarrassed by it.

Nope. They, they damage Trump. They move on, you know, the, the Russia collusion hoax, damaged Trump. They succeeded. They're not embarrassed.

No. It's not like they hold, you know, I, when, when I first became a radio talk show host, the biggest thing that I felt was the fact that I wasn't prepared to be one. I was forced to be one, you know, and day one, when you're not a talk show host,

and day one, you're a talk show host who was really never given your political opinions

on the air before. There's a little bit of panic that sets in because you say to yourself, okay, I sort of think this way.

How do I even explain how I think, you know, and I was like, if I'm wrong, and somebody

corrects me, the shame I will feel, that's not how they think. They don't think this way. Nope. They, they, they could care less. Yep.

Yeah. No, they, they don't, they don't, and if they own, again, this is not, there's no grand conspiracy here between the liberal activist and media, where they're calling each other going, hey, don't cover it, don't cover it, don't cover it. We know Barry Wise is going to give it less than 30 seconds, but that's Barry Wise.

Don't cover it. No, they all have the same mindset, and that is, let the sleep and dog lie, or in this case, let the lying dog lie. You know, the interesting thing is, I mean, and, you know, Barry Wise, I bet you see we have to carry more of it coming up here under, under Barry Wise, but Matt TIEV.

I saw him, who was part of the Twitter files with Barry Wise. He was, somebody said, oh, you're still sticking on this. You just can't get off a Fauci, huh?

You can't move on to the next thing, huh?

You can't, you know, you can't move on to, what is an important, important today, and

I'm like, okay, here we go, good deflection, you're trying to deflect, because why would you care? Well, we care, because what Fauci said, in private, what he did in public were two different things, that's important for the American public to know, but TIEV was like, I've covered this thing for years.

I'm going to continue to cover it, because that's what I've covered.

Yeah, I mean, that's it, and, you know, it's not, look, we've seen it before. It isn't going to be, it isn't going to change. No, there's not going to be, you know, the only thing that really matters is that the American people know the truth, because even if he were, let's just say that they prosecuted him for lying to Congress, let's say they got him on something.

Well, you know, let's say he could go to jail.

There was no pardon in place, and he could go to jail.

It's more important that he's sitting in jail, no one is above the law, what's more important that the American people get the truth or that one person is sitting in jail. No, what, what you get out of this, because as, as I said earlier in the show, when I saw the social media, well, he, he was just take the fifth, so I, well, you take the fifth, if you did something in your term that you believe, you could, you know, in his position,

if you believe you could go to jail for what you've done, he's been pardoned for all of that. Yeah, right.

The, you know, the only thing he can do, the only reason he would lie is because he would

show himself as saying one thing in public and another thing in private, and he might not want to do that, but does he want to commit perjury? No. Will he take the fifth, I don't know, it'd be surprised if he did. I don't think it's part of his personality to take the, the fifth, one of the things

that's come out of his, you know, it's like, okay, thinking Charlie Simon's, you're so vain. The V word has been used a lot to describe him with his obsession of his, you know, media presentations, which obviously shows how important that was, you know, to him, but the most important part is now that the, that history gets it right.

Yeah. And we already know that when something like this happens again, because now, I haven't even heard in a while, and there probably has been more COVID strains, remember how that kept going for a while. Yeah.

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Even last year. That's another COVID strain.

Yon. Yeah. And that's because people don't pay it. People don't have trust in the government anymore when it comes to pandemics. Right.

You've lost the trust of this generation, you're going to have to wait a couple of generations down the road to get it back again. But the important part now is that history gets it right and says, this is what we were told. That's the reality of it, and then you make your own decision at that point.

Yeah. You get as close to the truth as you can get as possible in politics. Yeah. Right. Yeah.

And I just don't, you know, again, what the people do with the truth is up to them.

I can't make people care about it. There's not, we don't see this enormous outrage. But having it as a matter of record is important. That's why he's going to be on Capitol Hill today. We'll see what he says.

You know, he was a face up before. I expect him to be a face up to a certain extent, you know, to save his own pride. I guess I don't know. But there are things you can't deny, and now that we have the diaries, sorry, you can't deny it.

And so they'll just let this, again, I think the radicals look at this and say, yeah, Yon, we're going to move on. We're not going to, nobody cares about this. And to a large extent, they're right. Nobody is outraged about the truth when it comes to a global pandemic.

About taxpayer dollars, US taxpayer dollars being used for gain of function. Nobody cares about the truth.

If that doesn't jolt you, because remember the first 90 days, it was zombie apocalypse territory.

If that doesn't jolt you into caring, because the next one might not be, COVI...

be something much more dangerous. How do you prevent it from happening again? You get to the bottom of the truth, and you make sure. And I guess one question I would be, I would want answered, is, why didn't you tell the American public the whole truth, right?

Why didn't you do it? Why didn't you tell them the truth? Why were you hiding it? Why were you? Why did you say this?

Now you said publicly that you never did anything or closed schools or wanted to, of course,

you didn't close the schools. The states would do that or the local school districts would do that. But you said they should, here it is, here's where you said they should close. Why did you say that when the science never showed that it affected children like it did the elderly?

Right. Right.

And remember, remember how long the teachers' unions would out?

We're in to, like, late 2021, early 2022? Yeah. Yeah. It was unbelievable what they did. And they, the left believe they could control not only control people's movement.

They're freedom. They're behavior. They could control their words on social media. But they didn't attempt to control drinking because liquor stores were, again, necessary business to be ill.

That's even, even the USSR passed out free vodka. That's proof. Yes. It was a communist plot. They kept the liquor stores open.

It's one 50 proof. We are a high radio brought to you by FPPF fuel power max managing time is key. Successful owner operators know that simply running hard is not enough. If we were that easy, anyone could do the job and expect the profits to roll in. There is a trade-off in higher costs, not to mention the increased risk for driving fast.

If driving slower takes time away from you, you could find some of the ways to get it back.

Never take time off during the last two weeks of the quarter or the last week of the

month, when freight typically is abundant. Sometimes it works to your advantage to look for loads that take you through home rather than to home. The latter can interrupt your revenue stream and require additional time to get back up to full speed again.

Owner operator Business 101 is provided by Overdrive Partners in Business Program. Go to OverdriveOnLi.com to the partners in business section of the website for more details on this and many other topics brought to you by Shell Rotella with advanced synthetic technology is designed to help keep you are rig running with more mileage and less maintenance. Coming up more with Gary McNamara and Eric Hartley, it's Red Eye Radio.

Here when I run you, he's running, I'm Gary McNamara. A ran back on the attack again, you saw that the United States and Saudi Arabia both went

after some of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard in Iraq, in eastern Iraq yesterday.

Also the reports of Iran going after the Kurds saw that, right?

That story out there. I'll tell you one thing that's happening because it's sitting right beneath the surface. Yesterday when the president was talking about the war, it was a blah, blah, blah, blah, day to me. When he took off, he heard before he met with Netanyahu, he took off Netanyahu when he was

asked the question that Netanyahu was going to bring him information about, was it pickaxe mountain that they had intelligence, he goes, "I know what it, you know, like he was irritated by where did that come from?" And the other one where he said, "Look, Iran wants a deal, it's just not formal yet." And I went, "Stop it."

Stop it, but it's this entire thing that they stopped the war, they stopped the attacks, that the president was promoting, we were going to do it, all of a sudden it was stopped. And one of the reasons was in that, and the leaks that came from the administration that said, it's because of munitions. Wall Street Journal questioned it yesterday said, "If it's about munitions, why isn't

the president and the conservatives in Congress screaming holy hell about it?

There's nothing after it. Nothing." It's the same thing.

It was when the president came and talked about China and the elections and t...

the conservative publications went, "Well, if they're doing all this bad stuff that you're

saying, why aren't you going to, why are there no sanctions?

There's nothing. I'm not going to do anything." And why bring it up is something that's absolutely urgent to the American people. Well, if we don't have the munitions and author from a senior fellow from the Manhattan Institute, it said, "It's not true.

It's not because of weapon. It's now the president later on denied it, but why are you getting those mixed messages?" Right? You're listening to Red Eyed Radio from the Ridley-Factor Studio. And he is a colleague and I'm Gary McNamara download our Red Eyed Radio app today and you

can listen when and where you choose. Yeah, so we had said it when we came in Monday and then I was yesterday we saw the Wall Street

Journal Editorial which was basically the same thing that we were saying.

This is major. If we're actually running out of munitions to fight a ran, then we're either allocating our defense money completely wrong or there's a huge problem that needs to be addressed now because this has been more than just this past weekend where that has been talked about.

Yeah. And you and I said, the number one priority of the federal government, number one, there isn't even a close second is defense of the American people. It's funding the military that is dominant number one before anything which is of course why the communist switched to your rid of it can't defend the democracy of the military

is gone. There is no democracy to defend anymore and so we've said all along even before this past weekend, why isn't the president screaming about it, why isn't Congress screaming about it?

Well, where was the, where was the heads up if the media is reporting these leaks?

And they talked about some of the anti-patriot defense missiles were down to the below a thousand that we had burned through so many at a high rate. Where was that alarm when we were burning through so many at such a high rate if that actually was going on? Where was the Pentagon going to policy makers along with the president saying, we need more

defense? We need more funding for this particular type of defense. Early on you had anti-drone technology that was being questioned because of the type of drones that Iran was using. And we were using a very expensive technology at that time to battle those drones.

So the question is if this is actually going on, this is my red flag. But that's going on, you're not looking at inventories every day.

You're not looking and saying, hold on a second, we're going to have to go to Capitol Hill

for more. We need, this is going to be a long-term situation. And we didn't anticipate, I don't buy it to begin with. Interesting article that I read, saw it in a tablet magazine and it was written by Park McDougall who is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute.

The Manhattan Institute is a conservative and free market thing tank. We've talked about it before. I've referenced the editor at large, my run magnet before he was editor from 1994 to 2008, I believe it was, but he wrote the book in 1993 that had a huge impact on me. It was called the '60s Legacy to the Underclass.

And really talked about the pathology of dependency that was caused. In the '60s when it was like the great welfare solution to all the problems we had

today, and he said it came back and bit them basically right in the butt, and that's what

it did. And so it's called the '60s Legacy to the Underclass, which is the welfare state that we have created. It's a wonderful book. I think Bush referenced it one time.

I forgot what he referenced on it. Heather McDonald on the police with the Manhattan Institute, talking about the statistics

When it was the cops, or remember the cops are hunting, exist to hunt down an...

And she was, "Figures don't show that." Right.

Here's what the figure showed.

She went through the figures, oh man, she was demonized for that. And she set out just to demonstrate with the numbers what was actually going on. She didn't know either way when she approached it, and then, if I remember correctly, was a bit surprised that the numbers were, of course, way off in what the left was promoting.

So here's what he wrote in article, "Why isn't Trump finishing the job in Iran?

It's not because the U.S. is running out of ammo." And I'm not going to read the whole thing, but I read the parts that I think are pretty important. So is he anointed states just too short on ammo to continue fighting? Oh, by the way, tablet magazine, the writer is a senior fellow at Manhattan Institute, just

you know what any perceived bias is, he might have, are he tablet magazine is a Jewish conservative center-right magazine. Okay, so he works with Manhattan Institute and also tablet magazine. So the United States is just too short to continue fighting, unsurprisingly, the answer is that there is a partial truth here, but one wrapped in a whole lot of BS and spin.

The first point to make is that much of the media coverage, presumably guided by some

in the Trump administration, is intentionally conflating munitions with air defense munitions, used to defense against drones and ballistic missiles. U.S. inventories are classified, that's one of the problems. But most media coverage refers to the estimates from the center for strategic and international studies, which the media say closely aligned with classified U.S. data.

Now, there's a problem there because do we actually know that's the truth?

And they have a table that had the key munitions stockpiles from the center for strategic and international studies published in April at the conclusion of the first wave of fighting. Of those key munitions, the Tomahawks and all the other high tech, the high end missiles,

are all high end standoff offensive weapons with the United States has plentiful cheaper substitutes.

We have the expense of one, we have many cheaper substitutes. The concern is specifically with the high end air defense munitions such as patriots, thads, and SM6s uses to defend ships from missiles and drones. However, none of these shortages precludes further operations against Iran. In U.S. military doctrine, air defense is not intended to provide an indefinite shield against

drone and missile strikes, given enough time any sufficiently capable enemy can overwhelm air defenses.

A problem known as overmatch, the purpose of air defenses is to protect U.S. and allied forces

long enough to suppress and then destroy the enemy's launch capability. We brought that up the last two days. Indeed, this was precisely the point reportedly raised by Senkham Chief Brad Cooper during the President's recent war counsel, according to the Wall Street Journal, Cooper believes the U.S. can cope with the limited stocks of patriot and other air defense interceptors

because the propped up U.S. strikes if they are proved by Trump would blunt Iran's ability to launch a large number of missiles, which is true. And what we suspect was the basis of Cain's reported warning is that munitions shortages do somewhat raise the risk of combat operations. The United States and Israel definitely have the capacity to conduct operations, but they're

going to have to maybe accept a little bit more risk than they have in the past. It could be a bald-hour and independent defense analyst and center for the center for European policy analysis told the tablet in an interview. They're going to have to get in a little closer using things like small diameter bombs. The United States still has a lot of munitions available, but they definitely will have a

little bit more judicious, perhaps be a little bit more judicious in how they execute and plan operations. Indeed, as the CSIS report, quote, above notes, the United States has enough missiles to continue fighting this war under any plausible scenario. As for the claim that munitions shortages hurt U.S. preparedness against China, this is technically

true, but misleading indeed such claims repeat a line of argument frequently advanced by under Secretary of Defense for policy, Albert Colby, a close ally of advance and other restrainers within the Trump administration, though Colby has been publicly supportive

Of the Iran war.

Indeed, since entering office, Colby has repeatedly attempted to use concern about munitions

as a pretext to attempt to starve Europe in general and Ukraine in particular of U.S.

arms on the theories that U.S. must conserve its stockpiles to deter China, but this

is a disarrayant honest argument at no point in living memory since China first began

to be identified as the main pacing threat. Has the United States been adequately prepared to deal with the threat, not only in terms of munitions, but also in terms of the broader force structure, but in a nightmare scenarios with they're talking about. But the nightmare scenario is do we have enough mission missions, munitions to fight a war

with China, Russia, and the Middle East? Right. That's the standard that he claims that they're using, it's why it's okay, but you can't use that because we're not going to be at war with Russia, and odds are we're not going to be with China.

Right. So that's the, of course, all of this is a bit theoretical now because we are under no illusion about the president's intention of fighting a strategically coherent campaign in Iran or anywhere else, but that's a problem of leadership. It's not that we don't have the ammo.

You know, it's, it's what is in the president's mind about what we're going to do. But like I said yesterday with the president for me was a blah, blah, blah. When he went after Netanyahu, I'm like, stop it, you know, like Netanyahu.

Because Netanyahu said, basically, all he said was, is that we're going to make sure that

the president has the classified information of pickaxe mountain that this is where they're putting a lot of the nuclear material that President took off on the reporter for them. Like, I know that. I don't, you know, whatever, to happen Netanyahu, it's like your allies fighting in a war. That shouldn't cause that type of response from the president as it did, right.

And then when the president said that, no, a ran was a deal, but it's just not formal yet. It's like, stop it. God, stop it. You know, nobody believes that, and, and if it were true, nobody believes a ran is going to abide by a deal.

Right. You have it. We're back to where we were three weeks ago, and this whole thing that, you know, we've got the best cameras in the world on that mountain, we're watching them closely. But what are you doing?

Where is the mission? Where is the mission? Well, that's where we played. Do we play history? John Kennedy?

Because, you know, Senator Kenny was saying, yeah, we did. They need to sit down. They need to explain to us in the Senate what are the goals are? Yeah, because he wasn't in that cut, he wasn't completely on board with the president. Yeah.

He's like, we, we need, we need to know what's going on. Well, this is, this is the problem. That's another red flag.

Even if it doesn't become public, you need to talk to the leaders of Congress to say, yeah,

and, you know, here's where we're going, if you want them to raise holy hell and say, if we don't have enough munitions, we need to get it now. But we don't know. Right. They're not tied up.

I don't know what the mission is. They're not talking to us. I don't know what the mission is. And it's, it's, it's beyond me. I, I just don't know where, you know, where do you go with this?

And their response would be, well, the mission is to ensure I know exactly the president would say is, is to ensure that they don't have an nuclear weapon. By doing what, how do you accomplish the mission? Yeah. How do you get to that point?

Is the question? Yep. So, you know, what the goal is, what is the strategy to reach the goal? Where is it? Right.

Where are we? And then we keep hearing, well, they, they want to talk. They want to talk. Right. Now, there's a great point that, that I read yesterday, some of the analysis that they

are, you know, they are starting to starve because of the blockade, you know, Iran, which

means, though, we should have never taken it off to begin with for a couple of weeks.

The whole thing is to shorten it. If you believe this policy is going to work, then don't back off on it ever to get something that you already had before the war, right? As we did with the memorandum of understanding, that was ridiculous, which is why that

got blown, blown up real quick, which was the only way that was going to go.

Yeah, I have no faith, I have no faith in anything that's being said right now. You know, I remember you said, I forgot, it was early on when I worked with you. You don't believe that the United States will ever fight a war to actually win again. They, that we've lost our stomach for war, that we've lost our will to go to battle. I'm not talking about necessarily the people that serve.

It's the people that lead those that serve. Well, it's also based on the people, remember, which is the polling, the average American person, which, by the way, is nothing new.

We didn't want to get involved in World War II either until we did.

I never forget the research, like 1939, year before, like 95% of the people wanted to stay

out of the war, World War II, even though the Lennelese program, I think it had started

at that point. And a year later, it's like 95% wanted to enter the war. We didn't go to war without Kita until 9/11, right? We are Red Eye Radio.

We'll be right back with more Red Eye Radio with every currently and Gary McNamara.

I'm sorry, I'm just I'm laughing here again from the Battle on Bee.

Rashida Talibes campaign slogan from 2026. Rashida Talibes, 2026 for a brighter future, and death to America, fresh off another term of working tirelessly for the nation she despises, Congresswoman Rashida Talibes introduced

her 2026 reelection campaign slogan for a brighter future and death for America.

She had the catchy new slogan at a rally to denounce the evil of the nation she wishes to continue serving. This is Red Eye Radio on Westwood One. The United States soccer Federation presents the U.S. soccer podcast. The place we're at, Megan Klinger, a World Cup expert, teaches you everything that

you need to know for this summer's World Cup.

How special is it that we've been able to follow this young group of guys? It's been such a roller coaster of emotions. Did you feel the intensity white a bit of time energy ever everything along the way on these guys making the country proud and I think they were the son of the U.S. soccer podcast presented by Henkel.

Follow and listen on your favorite platform, scrolling with Halie, I'm Halie Carania, I scrolled with the homies here in the live chat because there was a lot to scroll through on X on Instagram on TikTok, cutting through the clutter, one hot take at a time. Love seeing you all in the chat before the show. I tried to jump in just a few minutes before to say hello, I love the chat interaction, thank you for helping, but I do it to get all the videos and all the content that you won't find anywhere else, scrolling with Halie.

to search that up and I will be there. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.

Compare and Explore