D4vd’s Defense Team Says Evidence Will Show D4vd Is NOT The Killer As CSAM Evidence Comes Out

Reba's Hernandez case.

In part 1-2 and 3, we went over the arrest, we went over the prosecutors preliminary

brief where they detailed the timeline of how they think David killed Celeste, when they think David killed Celeste, when they think he dismembered her body and what happened afterwards. But tools he used, we also went over the 27-page autopsy that was finally released to the public, all of her injuries as well as things like the fact that her left ring finger, pinky, eye, we're missing, there's just a lot of details in there that I would watch first

before heading into this one. And now for this part, we're just going to go through all of the things that happened happening in court since his arrest. The previous part we went through, the potential accomplices that netizens have been pointing their fingers at, now we're going to keep you updated so that when we go into the June

preliminary hearing, you know what to expect, you know, kind of what's going to happen and what it means and that is where we're headed. So with that, let's get into part 4. David's attorney Blair Burke is proud of what she is doing.

Like maybe she's not proud about representing David, but you never know, she represented

Harvey Weinstein previously and she's stated in an interview, "I am a feminist."

“I mean, I think you can be a criminal defense attorney and be a feminist, that's not what”

I'm saying. Also, I guess it's not feminist to judge other women, but there's just a lot of statements that she made in this interview that are unhinged. She says in terms of sexual harassment, in terms of misconduct, even, that's a conversation we should have.

But these are very complicated conversations because human interactions, sexuality and sexual conduct is on a continuum, but while it's unacceptable or not allowed of us in a workplace for instance, someone with more power to abuse their power by being vulgar or borish or putting their hand on a woman when it's not wanted, it's important not to conflate that with rape.

Every one of these acts is not rape. Every one of these acts is not a crime. It is definitely something we should be talking about, but it's not necessarily something we should criminalize. To continue, one of those very uncomfortable truths is that there are women who engaged

in sexual contact with a man in situations when they're not necessarily attracted to that man.

But that more powerful man was offering them something they wanted, advancement, the gold

and globe. Something they want and they decided to have that sexual encounter in order to get that, intentionally, consensually, and later regret that they did that. We can decide that that is a fundamentally coercive act and should criminalize it.

“But right now, it's not a crime, and I believe it shouldn't be a crime.”

I believe one of the dangerous things about what's happening here is we're treating women as children. We are infantilizing women. She's talking about this case. No, so this is an interview that she did around the time that she's representing Harvey Weinstein.

So this is not particularly about David's case, but this is how she views what she does for work. It says, we're infantilizing women, it's a thing as feminists we don't want to do, which is to claim that a woman doesn't have the ability to choose. This is a very, very high-profile celebrity attorney, by the way.

She's represented Mel Gibson, Leonardo DiCaprio, Cameron Diaz, Lindsey Lohan, Britney Spears, Caitlyn Jenner, Halle Berry, Queen Lativa, Kanye West, Reese with her spoon, but also Harvey Weinstein, it seems that her career trajectory went from representing a lot of celebrities for celebrity like crimes, divorces, intoxication, paparazzi run-ins, but after rubbing Harvey Weinstein, it seems like she's become a defender of those that have been

accused of essay. Which is dangerous, considering she believes in says things like this, or at least it's dangerous in my opinion, right? I think it's dangerous, but what do I know? She says things like, the idea of someone going on Instagram or Twitter and making accusations

all of a sudden, that's enough to destroy a life. I don't think any of us want to accept that and we shouldn't, because when they come to our son, or our father, or our husband, we would want someone to care about the process. It's also really dangerous because with that comes this horrible slogan, believe women, as if some gender, by definition only speaks the truth.

She also says that the statute of limitations is very important, but even the way she phrases

“it, she says, "If you were a victim of a crime, you need to report it, and there are reasons”

for it, because the fashionist of it allows it to be a reflection of evidence. If you wait 20 years, just because you didn't feel like it, that creates a problem." No victim waits 20 years to go to the authorities, because they just don't feel like it, because they felt like they had other things that they wanted to do. And in the interview, she does the thing that makes me just makes one instantly question

her. She says, "My colleague, Alan Dershowitz. Alan fucking Dershowitz. Alan fucking lives in the Epstein files Dershowitz." Okay?

She mentions an op-ed that he wrote, so there's that.

and make a claim on Instagram doesn't make you a victim?" I do think that defense attorneys play an integral part of our justice system, and sure it is her job, but she really did not have to do this interview, she really did not have to say these things, and also say that she's a feminist while saying that just because a girl has an Instagram and an accusation doesn't make her a victim, putting down women in such

a condescending manner when they are probably going through some of the most traumatic moments of their lives to trivialize that, to be a girl in social media. You're not a victim, it's just so, like, it's harmful in ways that I can't even begin to express. Yes, she can be a criminal defense attorney, and a feminist, and she probably could represent

people who have been accused of assay and be all those three things at once. But to me, I can't tell them how you can be a feminist and say these specific things. I don't think that anyone was upset with her for representing Harvey Weinstein.

“I mean, yeah, people were, but I think these comments in the interview were pretty”

ass and I.

David retained Blair Burke last year when Celeste Body was first discovered in his car.

He has sent added Marilyn Badnarski, a death penalty defense attorney in LA, because technically David could face the death penalty. She's also just very experienced with over a hundred jury trials tried in federal court under her belt, as well as Regina Peter from Blair Burke's firm. The judge presiding over the case is Judge Charlene Almito.

She is a former prosecutor. She runs a strict program. She has a reputation of precision, fairness, composure. A lot of attorneys have stated you don't show up to her courtroom unless you're prepared. She has presided over the very high profile trial of Danny Masterson.

That 70 shows actor that was accused and convicted of assay. He was the one where I think a lot of people this might bring a bigger bell. Ash and Kutcher and Mila Kunis wrote those character witness statements in favour of Danny Masterson. The man that is convicted of assay, and they did this whole weird apology video, those

weird.

“But during the sentencing, she tells Danny Masterson, "I know you're sitting here,”

steadfast in your claims of innocence." And thus, no doubt, feeling victimized by a justice system that you feel has failed to you. And I'm sure you're asking yourself how you can be convicted of each charge of a sexual incident occurring 20 years ago based on the testimony of a woman that you believe

is disgruntled and has a vendetta against you. But you are not convicted on the testimony of one person, although the testimony of one person is sufficient evidence. You are not convicted based on rumors, anyone don't gossip or speculation, you are convicted based on the testimony and evidence that 12 people from the community found to be credible.

In addition, shortly after you paid Jane Doe 1, approximately $400,000 to keep quiet about the charged incident, and while some may argue whether you believed her story was true or not. As didn't want the bad publicity, she was seeking money from you, close to half a million dollars.

An awful lot to pay for the silence about an incident you claim never happened.

That's a bad look. So Mr. Masterson, you are not the victim here. Your actions 20 years ago took away another person's voice and choice. Ultimately, one way or another, you will have to come to terms that with both your prior actions and subsequent consequences.

She then slapped him with the maximum sentence, stating, "As to count one, a violation of penal code, I sent Mr. Masterson to be imprisoned in state prison for a term of 15 years to life, count two in prison for 15 years to life. I ordered them to run consecutive." So you can be, your terms can be concurrent, which means served at the same time, which

I don't understand the purpose of that. So it's like, both, let's say you have 15 years, 15 years, technically you would think it's 30, but you consider them simultaneously concurrently, so you only served 15 years. She said it consecutively, so charge one, 15 years, once that's up another 15 years. The total sentence is 30 years to life.

There have been a few hearings in court so far, all ramping up to the preliminary hearing.

And the first three hearings, I will say the defense team Blair Burke seemed a bit, not

as collected as Deputy DA Bethesilverman. So I'm assuming she's very, very expensive, right, in that caliber. Yeah. Yeah. Right.

I don't know for sure. There were estimates that Danny Masterson's trial, because he also had a really high profile team, probably cost him like $5,000,000,000 easily. And that was essay charges. Yeah.

This is, we're already talking about lots of discovery, lots of evidence, and murder charge, potentially death penalty. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

“A lot of people are like, how can David afford Blair Burke?”

I don't necessarily know how much David has made previously. In his career, but he was dropped from his label, and it sounds like a bad thing, right? It's like, oh, he was dropped from his label, which means he's not making any more money when the less body was found. He was dropped from his label.

However, it kind of almost gave him the rights to his songs back. Like he doesn't have to split as much licensing, it appears.

He's still getting like 23 million streams a month.

I try to cross reference with how much other artists were reporting on Reddit that they were getting paid as being the sole owner of their songs. I mean, he's still probably has to pay royalties to the people who co-wrote the songs, help produce the songs.

“But it doesn't, doesn't he make his own stuff in the closet?”

Yeah. But there's lots of producers that worked on his withered album, and he could potentially be making close to like a million dollars a month from streams. Hey. I don't know because streaming is like such a weird, I'm just going based off of what

people said on Reddit of how much they make per stream on certain platforms, and then I try to adding it up. My math could be horribly off, so don't trust me on this. 20 million loosens right now.

23 million on Spotify, that's not including Apple Music or other streaming platforms.

The only place that he's not making money is YouTube, so YouTube very quickly demonetized as a count. None of his music videos are bringing in money. I think that he's going to end up using most, if not all, and more on his legal defense team.

And I do think anything after that is, I mean, I do hope that Celeste's family bring on a civil suit.

“So, but I don't even know what would be left at that point.”

So it seems like Blair Burke is familiarizing herself with everything going on. She doesn't seem as quick with it as WDDA Beth Silverman, which is to be expected. It seems like Silverman has been working on this case for at least months and months and months and months. However, there are rumors that Blair Burke might not even take this case to trial.

So many who claims that they have worked with Blair Burke before it states that she is a tendency to take on celebrity cases before really looking into them, and that she probably may quit sometime during the trial or before the trial. One Reddit comment is talking about the person that knows Blair Burke. He apparently has a YouTube channel.

He's an attorney, I think it's like Bruce lawyer, and they write, he says that she predict she's going to step down before it even goes to trial either because the family runs out of money or because she won't like what she sees in discovery or because it'll be obvious that he did it. And she's already said some bold things about this case that she's like, oh, it's going

to show he didn't do it. People are also saying, Blair Burke doesn't necessarily seem like the type to do murder trials. It seems like the Hollywood fixer type.

But she did say in a previous interview, I never hesitate to get a client.

That's what I love.

“That's what I do the most important time for a criminal defense lawyer is when the mob is”

out, right? I'm very proud of what I'm doing as a woman as a feminist, as a criminal defense lawyer. We as women should not want injustice. But as for Blair Burke, one comment reads, she doesn't do many homicide trials. Her last murder client got life in prison, so not a seller record there.

That's what they write. But during the first few hearings in court, David appeared to be emotionless. He doesn't really show a lot of emotions just kind of looking around the courtroom, but he's not intently looking around the courtroom. It's just like he's just kind of gazing out and seeing what's going on.

Is that like the video clip that we're talking about? Yes. That was not Judge Alamedo. That was a different judge for his arrangement, and Judge Alamedo is not a fan of cameras in the courtroom.

This is a state case which usually lots of state cases are live-streamed. I highly doubt this will be live-streamed. How do you know she's not a fan of the cameras? So the same thing happened with Diddy's trial where all these legacy media as they have attorneys representing them, and they'll come, and they'll try to talk to the judge in

open court. So this is all in court transcripts, and they'll be like, "Hey, we need to either see something or we want cameras in the courtroom." So this in this case, the attorney came up and was like, "I'm representing like see media and listing all the media companies and like, we want cameras in the courtroom."

And she's like, "No." She's like, "No." She's like, "It's up to me and no." And she's citing the law too. She's citing codes, like, "Lock code."

She's like, "Because of this?" No. I can say no, because of no." So I don't think she's going to allow cameras in the courtroom, which might be for the best.

This is kind of similar to Luigi's trial in New York City, which is the first trial is going to be in state court, not federal court. So we know federal court, there's no cameras in the courtroom. State court, a lot of judges will let cameras in. It's up to the discretion of the judges, but Luigi's judge also does not seem to be a fan

of cameras. But he looks kind of bored. That's the best way to describe David. He just kind of looks bored. There hasn't really been any notable intel about how he looks in any of the hearings.

He just looks distant, bored, unengaged. Except the last one, he apparently winked at his attorney, allegedly.

Just a quick wink?"

“Yeah, they were able to push back his preliminary hearing by a month.”

And it's reported that, after hearing that, when David was led back, he winked at his attorney. I don't know. Maybe there was something in his eye. It could have been a lint ball.

It could have been a wink. But that's been the reporting. So he looks bored, and he has pledged not guilty, and his attorneys have stated, "Let us be clear. The actual evidence in this case will show that David Burke did not murder Celeste Rivas

Hernandez, and he was not the cause of her death. We will vigorously defend David's innocence. We would like to have the evidence come into the light of day." Meanwhile, the prosecutors are like, "Oh, you want the evidence to come into the light of day?

We're going to drop a pre-proliminary hearing brief." Okay, this is where there's so much legal context, and I don't know how many people care about this. But it might be important.

If you watch the very first audio episode of "The Updates," I kind of went into the

grand jury charging grandjuries, which resulted in indictment. So there's multiple ways that someone can get arrested in state court in California, which is a grand jury comes with a true bill of indictment. So this is, they voted. The DA went to the grandjurers and was like, "Can you vote?"

They're like, "Yes, here we go. In indictment, David Burke gets arrested, he's indicted."

“This is, you see this happen in federal cases because that's how it always happens in federal”

cases. It's a arrest, right, or it's like arrest, and then we find out about the indictment, but it's already been filed. So then in California, this is not that common. What's not common in indictment?

In indictments are not common in the state of California, on a state level. And that's because, for example, in a lot of places, when you get indicted, you don't really get a preliminary hearing, because you've already been indicted. Right. Right.

Yeah, you can go to trial. A preliminary hearing, what that is, is the prosecution presents evidence to the judge. And the judge decides if they're going to go to trial. The judge has to be like, "Okay, this is enough evidence that we have to try the case. I'm not saying you're guilty, but we have to try the case."

So that's the whole purpose of a preliminary hearing. And lots of DAs, if they don't, they don't want a preliminary hearing. Because they don't want to give away there. And also, the defense in the preliminary hearing can actually prepare, prepare and ask questions to the witnesses that the prosecutors are bringing up.

They can basically cross examine witnesses, like a mini cross.

Yeah. They don't like that. The DAs are like, "We don't like that. That's annoying. We don't like it."

Now in the state of California, even if you are indicted, you can legally request a preliminary hearing. So it's kind of pointless. It's pointless because you're indicted. So in most cases, like a federal case, you're going straight to trial.

I mean, you're going to have tons of status conferences and all these things and hearings. Yeah. But you're going to trial. Yeah. Why do we do it?

Or why are we doing another? Yeah. But in the state of California, you can request it anyway. So people will usually just file a criminal complaint, which is the DA files a criminal complaint and then the suspect is arrested or the target is arrested, whatever.

So who filed? Who requested this preliminary hearing?

“Well, you have to have a preliminary hearing.”

Okay.

So basically, at any point, there needs to be a decision made where there is enough evidence

to go to trial. Right? Inditement, the grand jurors decide there is enough evidence to go to trial. Right. So on a federal level, there's go to trial if they plead not guilty, right?

They go to trial. But in California state, even if the grand jurors say there's enough to go to trial, the defendant can say, no, I want the judge to reconfirm this, basically. I want a preliminary hearing. Okay.

But there was no indictment in this, just a criminal complaint. Then David gets arrested. Well, David is arrested, then there's a criminal complaint. So now someone needs to decide if there's enough to go to trial, which is they have to have a preliminary hearing.

Right. Now, here's the interesting thing, preliminary hearings legally the defendant is allowed those in a timely manner. I think it's like 10 court days. So if within 10 court days, the prosecutors can't pull it off, or the prosecutors are unprepared.

They do the preliminary hearing that judge is like, you guys have nothing. Then the defendant is free to go, but you can't just keep them until you're ready to do a preliminary hearing. So the defendant is usually like, okay, maybe we'll go with the preliminary hearing. If they feel like there's not enough evidence.

So Blair Burke, she's coming into these court hearings and she's like, yes, my client would like a timely preliminary hearing. Let's schedule it. The first schedule was like, may first, okay, then they're like, we need some of the information that the prosecutors have.

So we can prepare for the preliminary hearing. And this is where it gets very tricky, because just like the law, the defense is entitled to discovery for the trial, like there's different, but you're not entitled to all the discovery

Yeah.

“There's like certain benchmarks, I think they have to me, like certain discovery.”

They have to turn over. So it's been like a whole headache, and then it got pushed to May 26. And then the defense is like, maybe we need a little bit longer. So now it's June 29th, and this is the thing. I mean, the fact that they were even wanting it so soon is unheard of.

Usually, the defendants don't want a quick preliminary hearing. They want the defense to prepare as long as possible. They want to go through the discovery, they want to study it, they want to know, you know, kind of what to expect who they expect to testify to cross examine. Now, I don't think any of the star witnesses are going to testify, just putting that out there.

I think it's going to be lots of police officers, and I think it's going to be forensic experts. So, okay.

So this is my understanding, my little, what I'm getting out of this is that at first,

David's team was like, okay, let's just do this thing, because I think they think they maybe can get away with it, let's just get it over with. Yeah, sometimes the, from what I can tell online is, and from lawyers who have been speaking up about this, is that a defendant will push the attorney to want it sooner, because they're like, I just want to get out of here, like, I'm just, like, come on.

Let's go. Yeah. And then as the day started to approach, they were like, well, hold on, hold on, we need

“to be better prepared, you know, can you guys give me more information?”

So that's when the real, okay. Yeah. I see. And I think there was a lot of conversation, and even almost fair, mongering of people saying, well, he was an indicted, so the prosecutors might not be ready.

The prosecutors have no idea what they're doing, because he was an indicted, and it

already took seven months to arrest him, like, they're a mess, but in the state of California on a state level, most felony charges do not come with an indictment. They come with a criminal complaint, and there is a prelim. Mm-hmm. Okay, so you're saying they're, you think they're totally ready?

Yeah. And then just like seeing the way Beth Silverman is conducting herself in these hearings, she seems like she knows what the fuck is up. She's the deputy DA, right? She's the deputy DA.

She's in charge of this case. Yes. But there was also questions of, oh, will David as was arrested before the criminal complaint?

“So maybe the LAPD arrested them, and the DA's office is scrambling, right?”

Mm-hmm. But it just didn't seem like that, Beth Silverman is coming here locked and loaded. She seems like she's been ready. She's the one that said there's 40 terabytes of evidence. Yes.

Yes. And the defense was saying things like, you know, we hope all the evidence will come to light and see the light of day, and that is when the prosecutors drop the pre-pulmonary hearing briefs, which is a bit unusual. You don't really drop it at this stage.

But it seems like they had the opening, the defense was already like, we want the evidence to come to like, prosecutors are like, OK, but we're going to drop this brief. And also, it's a way to control the narrative for them, and it's, I guess, in a good way, it's to educate the judge on what has been happening behind the scenes, so that the judge is also very aware.

Now, Blair Burke and her team did not like that. They were like, we got to seal this shit, seal it. So, this cannot be public, Blair Burke said your honor, late this morning, we received a digital copy of what appeared to be a pre-pulmonary hearing brief filed by the prosecution. I come to the court with a very serious concern given the, I think what can be characterized

as the extreme media attention so far in this case. And the prosecution has appeared to file a rather unusual, in my experience, pre-pulmonary hearing brief that appears to be a very one-sided version of what is anticipated as the evidence in this case, but no evidence has been presented by the prosecution in a court room.

Certainly, there has been no adjudication of the admissibility of that evidence. There's no ruling, basically, of if that evidence is, you know, enough to go to trial. And we have a very real concern about the reasonable possibility of the jury pool at a future trial being tainted. She goes on to say that the brief evening includes hearsay.

On it, we would ask the court to seal the people's brief. We were not, obviously, we've come at the earliest possible opportunity to do so. Beth Silverman hits back.

I've certainly never heard of the defense claiming that a people's filing is one-sided.

I'm laying out what I believe to be the evidence that's been unearthed over the last several months and with the people in 10 to present the court during a preliminary hearing. It's interesting because whenever I handle these types of cases that tend to garner media attention, by the time the trial rolls around, which is, as the court is aware, years down the road, usually, many people on the panels don't even know about the case.

Beth Silverman goes on to state, "We've had cases that garner much more media attention than this one, and I can think of one that's going on right now." I think she's referencing Nick Reiner. Really? Okay.

What are she saying about it? No, she's just saying, "I can think of one right now that's getting more attention than this one." I think that's a reference to Nick Reiner.

Rocky was recently tried, like it's Ellie County. She goes on to state more or less, "Hey, so I mean, we're going to even bring all this to open court in a few weeks anyway." So what do you mean you want it to seal? Like there's nothing in there that's going to be sealed in open, like what kind of logic

is that, basically?

“That's what Beth Silverman is saying, and she says, "But I certainly like to see what”

the legal authority is that council claims it has before I make any other statements." Whatever I guess, it's an entirely one-sided narrative regarding what the prosecution believes they will seek to admit in court at the preliminary hearing, or what the prosecution claims will be the testimony in a preliminary hearing of witnesses. We do have a very real concern about the amount of white, hot focus of attention on this

case for the last seven months, and specifically in the last two weeks. And we are very much concerned with guaranteeing David Wright, as he is presumed innocent in this courtroom, as we sit here today, the right to a fair trial. And we believe that this brief, if not sealed, will harm and compromise that right. The judge sides with Beth Silverman, the people, you know, that she will not be sealing

the brief, hitting on the fact that LA County is the most populous county in the entire nation. LA County routinely has high profile cases, including celebrities, and, quote, "This case is not unique in that aspect," and I know Miss Burke, and this is not to undermine your own characterization of extreme media attention.

In this court's experience, this media attention is no different than the court has seen in other high profile cases. As for her saying that the people's brief is one-sided, she's like, "Yeah, it's the fucking people's brief, not the defense's brief." She says, "It's their brief, just like any filing by the defense would be one-sided in

the sense that it would be a proponent of the defense position."

Naturally, it's going to be one-sided, basically.

Why would the people put in your two cents? The defense is like, "Okay fine. We want to quickly get a preliminary hearing," and we want a lot of this discovery right now. Blair Burke was saying, "This is like before," she kept pushing it back.

“She's like, "From the media reports, apparently, there have been four months of secret”

grandeur proceedings. We believe that Mr. Burke is entitled at the earliest opportunity to an open preliminary hearing and the proceedings not be done in secret." So we're asking for a preliminary hearing to be set at the earliest possible date on the tenth day.

So this is like, they keep pushing it back and back and back and back, and then we-- So they wanted a quick endowment. Yeah. And then they keep pushing it back and back.

She also states that she wants discovery that they have no discovery, basically, quote,

"We have been given almost no discovery thus far. We've received a three-page follow-up report, no autopsy report, and a copy of the complaint, and we would ask the people respectfully to produce discovery at the earliest opportunity." Beth Silverman is like, "You're on her." As I indicated to Council, there's approximately 40 terabytes of discovery in this case,

more over in order to obtain the transcripts from a grandeur investigation. So she's like, "Blair Burke is asking me for grandeur transcripts." Council has to file a motion. She knows the way the system works. She's not doing it.

So she's like saying, "Oh, I didn't get the grandeur transcripts." And Beth is like, "You didn't fucking file a motion together." She didn't say it like that. Yeah, yeah, so Beth is like, she doesn't know what she's doing. Yeah, she's like, "She knows the way the system works.

I'm not able to gather those." They have to be provided after the court orders them released because it was an investigation.

Second of all, if Council plans on going to a preliminary hearing within 10 days,

it is unlikely that there will be very much discovery provided within that period, given the voluminous nature and how long it's going to take to copy and to drives. In addition to that, the coroner's report was sealed in this case in order to prevent it from hampering truthful testimony from witnesses that testify at the grandeur,

which is kind of interesting to think about. Wait, why is it interesting? Oh, yeah. Like, how with anybody know, so they're implying they don't want someone potentially know the state of...

Or how she died. How she died to tell a lie, we're mad, okay, wow. Or it could be like the, I guess, the TV shows where nothing has been released in some months, like, yeah, I didn't know he stopped her. And I was like, "Who said she was stopped?"

You know, something like that. So does Davis team seem like underprepared or just the... From what I saw? I know, I think I'm sure... I'm sure Blair Burke is on her shit.

“And it seems like with every hearing she's more on her shit, okay?”

But if he's paying that much, I mean, at that point, like, get by and steal in there as well. Like, it's just, she doesn't seem to be as quick with all these little things, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

the defense, I mean, you're expecting them to be sharper than the prosecutors, no offense, right? Because, like, these are the top, top level. Yeah, they're making the big bucks. Yeah.

“That's why they can really, maybe into millions.”

Yeah, like, you're expecting... They're gonna run circles around the prosecution. Yeah. But... Wow, okay.

Not saying prosecutors are not as intelligent. They're just overworked. They got a lot of cases going on. They're underpaid, they're overworked. So the prosecutors are like, "You guys want a preliminary hearing.

Anyone on all the discovery? I'm telling you right now, you're not gonna get that." Because there's so much evidence, it's going to take longer than even 15 days to get you the evidence that you want.

Throughout the investigation, we've accrued approximately 50 terabytes of data. Over the last approximately month, maybe five weeks. Robbery Homicide Division has been trying to upload their entire investigative file through a system

that the county purchased for the DA's office where we're also supposed to be able to share information with defense counsel directly. After approximately four and a half weeks, five weeks, only 30% of the LAPD's case file has been uploaded

and that is using multiple computers. There is a voluminous amount of digital data in this case. She also gives us an idea of what kind of evidence there will be. There are police reports and documents from the LAPD

from the Sheriff's Department, from the CHP, there's body-worn video. There are numerous forensic reports, including DNA Trace evidence, field investigative unit services, chemical processing, there are property reports, there are vehicle reports,

there are arrest and booking reports, all of those things we are going to endeavor to turn over, hopefully tomorrow afternoon. - Overall, Beth Silverman seems super confident. David's team seems a little less confident.

There are a lot of interesting moments

where David's team seems, okay, maybe it just takes a second

for them to get into the groove of things, but there's this moment where the defense requests the judge to unseal the search warrants. We'd ask that we'd already move to unseal them so that the court can issue an order.

So they're like, we're just asking through mouth. The court is like, yeah, I'm not sure I can issue just a general order to unseal search warrants without specific case numbers. I don't have a problem with issuing an order,

“but I think I would need to have the specific,”

and by case number, it wouldn't be this case number, Beth Silverman talks to a detective, and she's like, okay, I'll get you all the warrant numbers. And later, Blair Burke is like, by the way, I brought you this five terabyte drive.

For you, since you told me, last time an open court, that the one terabyte drive, I gave you was enough. - Wait, wait, wait. - Okay, so previously, previously Blair Burke gave Beth Silverman a one terabyte drive,

which is like, it's notoriously not a lot. Like, this is one terabyte. There have been four year requests that we've done, whether it like send us a fucking one terabyte drive. And it's like, police reports, right?

So I'm assuming in this case, it's massive, and they're sending one terabyte drive. - I see no, there's 50, 50 terabytes. - So then, she sends one terabyte drive and Beth Silverman and open court is like,

what did you think you were gonna do with that? Like, what do you wanna do with that? That's nothing. We need a lot more than that.

Like, you keep asking us for discovery and you give us a one terabyte drive. So then, she's like, by the way, I brought this five terabyte drive.

“Okay, she's like, we're even around, I think.”

- Now, they want specifically before this pre-lim, it seems that the defense clearly won the iCloud data. Beth Silver, this is iCloud from David's iCloud account. They want that.

- What? - The hats would they want? - And by the way, the CCM is not gonna be on there.

We're gonna get into that in a second,

but they want the iCloud data. Whatever's on that iCloud? I don't know. - I don't know. - There's on a client called Photos.

- Probably. - Photos, voice memo, maybe. - Notes apps these days. People have been doing lots of notes apps. He seems like the types do that.

Yeah, so they're like, we want the iCloud data. Beth Silverman was like, that iCloud data into Tality, just the iCloud data is probably like eight terabytes. Which this has been, again,

misspoke in in the news and on Reddit of like, oh, it's eight terabytes of CCM. It's just eight terabytes of iCloud data. And none of the CCM is gonna be on there, obviously. They can't just like hand over CCM like that.

So Beth Silverman is like, okay, we'll get your fuckass five terabyte hard drive out of here. She doesn't say it like that, but more or less. She is like, absolutely,

I will say, absolutely under no circumstances. Did she say that? I'm just making things up. It just sounds like that, okay? She's like, I'm sorry.

Just so counts as aware. And I'm sure the court knows this. We cannot place an item that is larger than the capacity of the drive you provided us on two different drives.

She's like, like, really speaking, we don't do this. I can't split up evidence. So if the iCloud data is eight terabytes, I can't put four on this one and four on the other one.

You gotta at least give me a 10 terabyte drive and I can put all the eight terabytes in that 10 terabyte drive.

So basically, get your fuckass five terabyte drive out of here.

Is that not? And Beth Silverman is like, it cannot be split.

Not the fuckass five terabyte drive, but like the rest of it. Blairbrook says, so Beth Silverman says, it cannot be split.

I heard that for the first time today.

We will do that and deliver tomorrow. So she said, I'll get you your 10 terabyte drive tomorrow. And she says, great. And also going forward, I've been informed that when you give up a hard drive,

it needs to be sealed. In other words, you know, you give us an open box. We need a sealed hard drive like in the original packaging.

Mm, okay, so. Yeah, yeah. Yeah. Oh, wow. Yeah, I did think, yeah, I don't know.

Maybe I'll see her and her folklorious soon, I guess. But there are, it's interesting. It's just interesting. Oh, and it's speaking of the CCM.

So the CCM evidence, the way that they do it

is, at least in this county, is they're going to put it on a law enforcement computer. That CCM will be placed in the courthouse in a very specific room that only the defense and the prosecutors can access.

And the defense will have to go there and view the CCM, or an expert will have to go and view the CCM on that specific computer. They can't bring it back. They can't have it on their devices,

because even just having it on a device is illegal, even if it's for work, right? Yeah. Which, I mean, Blair Burke knows that. And she's like, yeah, absolutely.

So it's not a problem. I'm just saying, it was a part of the conversation, yeah. Because I guess there were some concerns of, like,

“maybe David would like to see certain things, right?”

Now, netizens think that this, the defense, probably will not be insanity. It doesn't seem like there can be even a viable insanity plea, which, I mean, hardly ever works to begin with.

But there's just so many times you can see, he's in the right state of mind protecting his tour, protecting his music, performing. A lot of people think that the defense will be that Celeste Odeed, and that he is just responsible

for freaking out and getting rid of her body, or trying to get rid of her body. In the autopsy report, it looks like she tested positive for drugs being in her system. Those were presumptive positives.

So this is the initial basic toxicology, which is just like a basic thing that they do for all the autopsy's. But how a lot of things could come back positive because of other compounds that are found in the body

through the decomposition process, such as meth, MDMA, but when they did further testing, those came back not detected. Other things that were found in her system

were low amounts of ethanol, basically alcohol and her system,

which we all know is naturally formed during the decomposition process. So really, there doesn't seem to be drugs in her system that the defense could point to and say, "See, she Odeed."

“I think the only thing the defense really has”

is everything the autopsy doesn't say. So the autopsy says the manner of death is homicide, and by two penetrating wounds. But it doesn't say who's holding the knife, right? So it doesn't say it is a knife, it doesn't say it's David holding the knife,

so I think that's gonna be the main focus. I don't necessarily think they could even point the finger at anybody else, but I really don't know what the defense is going to be. These are just speculations.

I just can't imagine what the defense is. As for Did David's family know, that's been a huge topic of conversation because the court documents states, this is the pre-pryliminary hearing brief

that Blair Burke wanted sealed. Throughout 2024, the victim spent a significant amount of time with the defendant, including summer weekends at his home in the Hollywood Hills, entraveling with him to Las Vegas,

London, and Texas to meet his family. People cannot grasp the concept that David's parents believed that she was a Vage. She clearly doesn't look of age in any photos and videos that I've ever seen of Celeste.

She clearly looks like a minor online sentiment, agrees with that. The family have reportedly been very, very close with David. It seems like, I mean, there's footage of his sister going up on stage.

There's alleged videos and photos from the concert at the fond of theater where Celeste is sitting with his parents in the VIP section. One comment, right?

A family David was telling people she was 19 and a college student at USC. And maybe that flies with his friends. Like, maybe that is okay if he's brought to a huge house party where the lights are dim and everybody's drunk.

And you're just like, oh, yeah, this is my girlfriend. She's 19. I don't know if people would question in that context, especially if it's like a very passing greeting.

“I'm like, hi, I think if you hung out with Celeste”

multiple times, you would know she's a minor. Like that, I just can't wrap my hand around the fact that someone could argue that they don't know, but I don't know.

Now, if you're bringing someone home to your parents

and you say she's 19 and she's a student at USC, his dad isn't attorney, his mom is a teacher. I can't imagine that they would believe that. I just don't see that happening.

“- You know, high school middle school teacher, is it?”

- I don't know. But I mean, she has children around that age. - Oh, yeah. - Oh, that's crazy. - It doesn't make any sense to me.

She looks so young in all of her pictures. I know people are probably gonna try to do the whole adultification thing of young girls, whether she's mature, she looks 11. I just, I don't know.

I don't know how they could even possibly believe that. (upbeat music) - They did know, however that David was at least being investigated before his arrest, because they were subpoenaed to the grand jury hearings

earlier in 2026. And that's part of why the information got leaked that there was a grand jury investigation in to David, because all of this is sealed. So it gets leaked in two big ways.

So the first of them is that David's parents

and his brother Caleb, the three of them, Caleb is now 18, they fight the subpoena. They're in Texas, and they file a petition of habeas corpus contending that the trial that the courts order summoning them

to testify in California violates due process. So this is public. So they have to reference the grand jury investigation. And they have to reference that David is the target of the investigations.

- That's how people found out. - Yeah, so that's how they're like, "Oh, we can confirm." For sure, there's grand jury investigations in to David, because otherwise it's sealed.

And then Neo gets arrested, and it's kind of like, okay, now we can definitely confirm, again, once more, that this is happening. - But they did end up going? - No.

- The family's not? - No, yeah. - They's still been fighting it out in court. - Okay. - Yeah.

So the DA's office fought telling the judge in Texas, I would say if a car with a dismembered decomposing body is registered to your home address, because David's car was registered to Texas.

“You should expect to be questioned by the authorities”

about that. And that's what this is judge. I'm asking you to find that the family witnesses are necessary and material, and I'm asking you to find that it will not cause them

undue hardship. As for the Burke parents, their attorney argues on their behalf, if the DA needs parents to testify, then they have no case.

In my opinion, they're just doing that for harassment purposes. If a proper subpoena was issued, they would have already spoken. They, the attorney has stated

that the Burke family has been somewhat aware that an arrest was a possibility, which is kind of crazy. Yeah. Which I said no, David also transferred

two of his Houston houses to his a trust under his mom's name. I believe his mom is the beneficiary of the trust. That was back in September of last year. So he moved quick with that.

Really quick. - He's September? - The body was found in September? - Yeah, and within like 10 days, he moved the house to his mom, both houses,

and you know-- - It must be in the work already then. - Yes, maybe. If I'm not mistaken, that's a very lengthy process to move a house title deed, whatever, to a trust,

“to like move ownership, I'm sure you have to get,”

I don't know if you have more gauge, like lots of people are involved. - Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. He was sure started that before. - Or got it done very quickly?

- All right, very quickly. - Right, but it seems like that was a huge priority then at that time, is all I can say. But through the attorney, the family has made a statement stating, the parents are sad and disappointed

that David was arrested. However, they fully stand behind him and believe he is innocent, they fully support him. Caleb, this is David's 18 year old brother. He was seen in that video with Celeste

and his little sister at the fond of theater. He has unfollowed David on Instagram, since David's arrest, he takes to his story to write all pedophiles and rapists should die, period.

So that was kind of the very first statement

that he ever made. During the grand join investigations because he also filed a habeas corpus to not testify in front of the grand jury, people thought that he was probably on the same sentiment

that David's parents were on, which is they're gonna stand by David. But then he posted that and so people were wondering, "Okay, well, clearly this is in the context of everything happening.

It seems like he could really only be talking about David." Right, is what people were thinking. Then he was also seen liking comments like Justice for Celeste. Now after David's arrest though,

around the time of David's arrest, Caleb starts releasing more music. I will say that he didn't just kickstart his career

This is not like a new thing,

“which I do think would be very problematic.”

He has been releasing music for a long time for like the past three or four years. He actually went under a different stage name. So he went from being Caleb with a V. So CVLEB, that was his stage name,

similar to David, but then he changed it to Karakova, to further distance himself from his brother. So he released two songs, one was titled Sex, which kind of sent the internet off on a witch hunt of people accusing Caleb at best being insensitive,

at worst being involved. There were a lot of accusations being thrown about. Caleb Burke has since come out to state, quote, "I've been wanting to say something for a while, but I have to be careful about what I say.

This is an ongoing legal matter. I don't want to make this horrible situation about me. "I want justice for Celeste and her family. "I've seen people say that I knew what was going on "and was protecting my brother.

"This is not true at all. "I have not lived with my brother for years "and was not very close with him. "We didn't speak often other than when our family "was brought on tour or he was visiting home.

"I was around Celeste a few times, and I was 15. "I did not know her well, and I did not know her age."

“I think I will say maybe more believable”

when someone is 15 to not be able to identify. I think I give a lot of grace in this situation versus his parents. - Yeah, I'm like, you're 15. You probably don't know either, right? He continues, "People have been posting a video

"showing me backstage with her at one of David's concerts "when I was 15, and I've been waiting "to address it for a while." So when this video was circulating, some people were even thinking,

"What if Caleb and Celeste were dating?" And like there were so many weird internet theories which turned out to be entirely false, but he writes, "People have gone as far to say "that I was sneaking her backstage, which is not true."

She was already at the show, and the video takes place after the show had already ended. In the video, we were sent to grab something from a fan that was in the front of the stage and we were walking back. News companies such as TMZ Daily Mail

and others have started saying that I'm taking advantage of the whole situation to promote my music and that I am just now launching my music career. That is not true at all. I've been releasing and posting music

over the last three to four years, and I took over a half year hiatus due to what happened. I changed my online name from Caleb to Kova as I did not want to associate myself with any of this. I have not once mentioned the situation

or my identity on the new accounts.

So on Car Kova, he never mentions that he's David's brother.

TMZ even reported my agent correctly saying that I'm 20 when I just turned 18 in November. I had scheduled my first release under the new name before any of this became I had done again. And the song came out two days before the arrest.

This project, the music videos and songs were already in motion long before any news covered around my brother resurfaced. My intent has never been to use this to bring attention to myself or my music.

This is the whole reason why I started over from scratch. My decision to continue releasing music is not about using any of this for attention. Music is my life. And after stepping away from months

because of everything that's happened, I want to build my own path. Medicine reactions have been mixed. There are two groups of people. They're very divided.

One group who believe that Caleb, David's brother, is being incredibly insensitive and tone deaf. With one person writing, even if Caleb had no malice in releasing music, at best, it's still incredibly disrespectful and demonstrates a complete lack

of empathy towards the lesson her loved ones. I keep seeing comments following his statement along the lines of he shouldn't have to pause his life

or there's never going to be a perfect time to do it

and find the lack of empathy towards the lesson her loved ones absolutely important. No matter how you spin it, even if he had nothing to do with this case, he is someone who is way too close to this case for this to be anything but in bad taste.

Anyone who says quote, "There will never be a perfect time "is being willfully ignorant." Are you telling me there's truly no better time than right fucking now? One comment response, "Just as for Celeste, I disagree though.

"If my brother killed somebody, what does I have to do with me? "I didn't do it.

“"Y'all need to remember that David Anthony Burke is the murderer.”

"Not David's family, not Celeste's family, not David's friends, "not Victoria Mendez, which is the fake name he ordered "supplies in. "It was David, be mad at him." Another perspective reads, first, nobody in this case deserves

more sympathy and empathy than Celeste and the reverse Hernandez family. But people should really give Caleb a break. He is not the same person as David. Just because his older brother made a terrible decision

does not mean that Caleb should have to suffer. He's already disowned him on Instagram stating that he thinks all rapists and pedos should die.

He basically voiced that he wants death for his own brother.

Consider how Caleb is feeling, what he's going through right now and what he's human too. Imagine how difficult it would be to find out that your older brother who you idolize and drew inspiration from is not at all who you thought he was.

Then while trying to process that you're constantly being criticized and hated on just for being related to him, can we please try to have somewhere empathy here? He's 18, the dude is barely even an adult.

One person comments, agreed. He denounced his brother's actions

It's got a suck to have that shame and stain on the family.

And of course, you'd give your family and remember the benefit of the doubt until you saw evidence to the contrary. We didn't even find out anything until just a few weeks ago.

I doubt he knew any more than we did. Predators are professionals at lying and hiding their behavior. Their families want to believe the best of them. So it's even harder for them to accept.

If he was defending him in spite of the evidence, it'd be a different thing, but he isn't. His life and character shouldn't be ruined due to his brother's shitty choices. My heart goes out to him because having a family member

turned out to be a pedo and a murderer is a different kind of loss. One that you can't even really grieve without being looked at funny by the general public. It's got to be overwhelming AF

and I hope you have support beyond the parents who might be in denial for all we know. At least he came out and spoke on where he stands with it, which took a lot of spine in my opinion. Another comment disagrees though, writing,

but just saying if he wanted to, he could release all this shit later it wouldn't have been the end of the world. One person writes, "I think the problem "with the whole discussion of Caleb

"is that people are blurring the lines of, "this is toned up and poorly timed "and this proves malicious intent."

“That's why some of this starts feeling like a bias driven”

which hunt. The standard becomes impossible to satisfy. If he releases music now, he's capitalizing on the tragedy. If he waits two years, people would probably say, he only waited for the backlash to cool down.

If he speaks publicly, he's manipulating sympathy. If he stays silent, he doesn't care. Once literally every action is interpreted in the worst possible light, it stops being about fairness

and starts being about emotional projection. And to be clear, I completely understand why people are disturbed by the timing and the lyrics given the context of this case. The optics are awful.

But this feels gross and insensitive. It's still very different from this guy is intentionally exploiting a murder child for his career, his musical career. One is a reaction to optics and emotion.

The other is a serious assumption about someone's motives with no direct evidence behind it. I will say I think the part that struck out to me is that out of everyone on David's, I don't want to say side, but people that were closer

to David than Celeste, that a public is spoken out. His brother seems to be the most transparent and straightforward with condemning David.

“His own brother, and I think that you can tell”

from the videos, and again, this is not me saying, "Oh, David's brother deserves all of our sympathy." You can tell from a lot of the videos, he definitely looked up to his brother. - Is he well established at all?

Does he have-- - No, so he's a little. - Okay, barely having it, okay. - Barely, meaning he doesn't outright condemn his brother, but he basically does, you know? And so it seems like this is the most transparent response

that someone from close to David has put out. Like far better than even Neo and Asia who are older than Caleb and also were not related to David. - As for Celeste's family, they told Rolling Stone that they are in unfathomable pain.

There were rumors circulating that Celeste's parents were accepting money from David to hide the relationship that there were numbers thrown about anywhere between $9,000 a month, $15,000 a month, that they were receiving this payout,

that they were being financially supported by David. They have flat out rejected that rumor, stating, I mean, Celeste's dad says,

I have never had any contact with this guy,

and we haven't received any money from him or anyone in this family. The Hernandez family attorney states, I had the heartbreaking responsibility of informing the Rivas Hernandez family

of the horrifying allegations in court

“that David Anthony Burke stabbed Celeste”

stood by while she was blood to death, used to train sought to cut off her limbs and bought a burn cage with the plan to incinerate evidence. Delivering the news was the most difficult thing I've had to do in 37 years as a lawyer.

He states for the family, the Rivas Hernandez family is absolutely devastated by the findings contained in the medical examiner's report involving the horrible and gruesome death of their beloved daughter.

Those findings have caused profound emotional pain for the family. They respectfully ask for your privacy, understanding and patience as they process this information. There are no words to express the indescribable pain

the family is experiencing right now. They still have bills to pay and jobs to go to every day. All they want is time to grieve and heal. In another statement that's been released by the family, they say, we would like to thank the LAPD and DA's office

for their hard work. We'd also like to thank the people of like elsewhere for all their support. Celeste was a beautiful strong girl who loved to sing and dance.

Every Friday night was movie night and we spent wonderful times together. We'd love her very much.

And she always told us that she loved us.

We miss her deeply and all we want is justice for Celeste. Some people don't like Celeste's family. Some people don't like the statements that they put out. Some people don't like that specific statement writing. Why do you feel the need to mention

that she always told you she loved you? Is this so no one thinks she hated you guys? Some people are saying it's almost like an admittance of guilt. She told us she loved us. So we were attentive and loving parents.

I do want to know that Celeste was reported missing the second time the police did open an investigation into the family. That BDs interviewed everyone at Celeste's family home and they found no evidence of child neglect.

since they were unable to locate Celeste.

They were unable to determine if a crime had happened. Wait, this is during the time, OK.

“And I mean, I think there could be a lot of factors.”

There's no evidence. There's TikTok repost. There's random statements from people who claim they were friends with Celeste. There's TikTok repost that allegedly Celeste made in an account.

And even that's really hard to verify where she might have liked things that insinuated that she had a rough home life. But I think having a rough home life is leaks away from having neglectful parents

that played some sort of role in not protecting you enough. I think in a perfect world, every parent should protect their child in a way that they can't go missing, that they cannot be groomed. But that's a very perfect world.

And there could be a lot of factors

of why they didn't even feel comfortable going to the police. I think people have some people have drawn this speculation that Celeste's family didn't really bother to continue bothering the police about Celeste's going missing because they didn't care.

I don't think that's the case. I mean, you're also talking about a time that's heavy with probably ICE presence. Immigration status could also play a role. So as you economic status definitely plays a role.

I mean, she was missing for so many months. And no one was the police weren't really looking for her. So even if they had gone to the police every day, which we don't know if they did or did not, we don't know why the police weren't looking for her.

Maybe they have already had dealt with the police and they know the police is not going to look for Celeste. Because I mean, they didn't. They didn't look for a girl who's missing from a socioeconomically not a stable background.

I'm sure if this was a missing girl from the Hollywood Hills, they would have looked for her. I think there's a lot of nuance that maybe we need to factor into this case. And I think out of everyone

that the netizens should attack Celeste family is probably last on that list. London, however, has been a huge issue. The preliminary brief has stated that Celeste traveled to London with David

and traveling to London has been heavily just a point of contention because you cannot travel to a foreign country without your parents without some sort of foreign being signed. Usually every country has different rules.

She did have a passport card

“that was abandoned in Santa Barbara and found, remember?”

The isolated highway stretch. So did her parents know that she was going to London with something forged? Was it not, I guess that's been a huge point of contention. Because London is brought up, we don't know if David

had gone to London multiple times. But recently, he was talking about working on the withered album writing the album. And he says that he went to London to write the album. So it's just another London connection,

but he says quote, "I went to London with three of my friends." And we made a song every day for two weeks. I love London because of the gloomy aesthetic and the gloomy vibe and environment that London has. There's barely any sun there.

And I love that because the music I make is really sad. So in the two weeks, I made a song every day and I came out with half the album. And then I went back to Houston for another two weeks. And I made the rest of the project on my phone just off a piece.

You know, the people sent me with some things that I made. So if that's the case, maybe this is the London trip in question. And if that is also correct, it seems like the last may have helped write a lot of the music. And that is bringing more lyrics up into discussion.

There is a whole interlude, remember, of the last voice. What seems to be the last voice in this new album, the string theory interlude? Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. So the dots seem to all be connecting here.

I do think that was Celeste family. We can't really be so rigid with our thinking.

“I think this is out of all the places to have some level of understanding.”

DA Hawkman says, I had the chance to meet with some of the family members of Celeste. And their grief is uncalculable. And as to what happens to their daughter, what they have demanded, what we have assured them is that the DA's office working with LAPD will give them the proof beyond a reasonable doubt on who killed their daughter

on how their daughter was killed and bring that killer to justice. That killer that we have now charged is David Anthony Burke. But one person still writes, I've no sympathy for them. They had one job which was to keep their kids safe. Another writes, they chose to be a parent

then refused to even do the bare minimum. It amazes me that there are people having sympathy for these parents. It's disrespectful to that little girl that no one was protecting her.

The devil doesn't always need an advocate,

so stop with the old they tried BS. David is just one person. There will always be sick fucks like him around. It's up to the parents to watch and protect their child. That is why they need to be charged and made an example of

so maybe the next time a parent will think twice. A lot of people think that's a bit harsh with someone responding. I said it before and I'll say it again. Whatever to less parents and family did or didn't do, they're facing the consequences of it now by having lost their daughter

To me, that's punishment enough.

You guys have a right to your own opinions, but as for me personally, I don't feel good about rubbing it in. As for David's family, they're facing the consequences of their own too. Others write, they see their daughter hanging out at nice houses and getting taken care of.

He had to have been buying her clothes, nails or whatever most predators do and they thought, wow, she's having fun and she's safe. It's easy to place blame and yes, they should have done more, but also David shouldn't have murdered her and she would still be alive. I just think there's a lot more places to be angry about right now.

Prosecutors have yet to decide if they want to pursue the death penalty. The defense has, like I said, requested the preliminary hearing,

be pushed back to June late June.

And as of right now, he is in the LAPD 77th Street Trail. He's in the same facility as Nick Riner, who is accused of killing his parents. David is also being segregated away from the other inmates due to his fame and notoriety.

He gets a shower every other day. He gets a phone call the same day that he showers. So every other day, so it's a really big day for him, shower days. A couple hours of recreation time a week by himself. I believe it's about three hours a week.

He's not on self-exit watch, but he's alone. They think that something could potentially happen to him due to his status.

There also could be more charges ahead of David's way.

Just because, I mean, the CSAM, that could be a state charge that could be a federal charge typically, it's the feds. And specifically, for CSAM, I mean, Beth Silverman really emphasized it too. In the court hearing, she uses the words, he also had an iPhone. And that iPhone, as it's been reviewed, contained a significant amount of child pornography.

And under the law, child pornography cannot be retained without their being certain orders in place. I've consulted with our high tech division, which also handles cases involving child pornography. The protocol, unless the court chooses to structure something different. And she goes on to state that they're going to put it on a law enforcement device in the court house,

but she's like really honing in on the CSAM.

“So that's why people think, yes, it's to emphasize how deplorable the evidence is that they found.”

But also, maybe there are extra charges coming as way. But if those charges will follow, I guess, is another question. And I guess the big question is, what's going to happen at the preliminary hearing? I don't think it's going to be explosive in the sense of, I don't think they're going to bring in star witnesses.

And all these other people, I mean, I might be proven wrong. I think a lot of it is going to be law enforcement. So in preliminary hearings, things are a little bit different. So you can actually bring in law enforcement. And they can testify on what would normally be considered hearsay in a trial.

So in a trial, you can't sit there on the stand and say, this person told me this. Interesting. But in the preliminary hearing, because it's a preliminary hearing, a police officer can say, his friend Neo told me this. That's an example.

When I was talking, I interviewed this person and they told me this. So hearsay is allowed in preliminary hearings when it comes from law enforcement officers.

“So you really, that's why a lot of preliminary hearings, you have in smaller cases.”

You'll have one law enforcement officer who's like, okay, so I investigated this case. This is what I was told by this person that I went here. They told me this and then pretty much that's the whole witness. But it's going to last a minute, right? I mean judging by the way things are moving.

So Beth Silverman says she can get it done in like four to five days. Four to five days. Yes, but that's not factoring and the defense. Also examining, you know, but also we don't know because she was also there was lots of scheduling happening. She was like, I already told my witnesses, cancel your vacations and Blair Burke keeps changing the timeline.

So we're going to hear some firsthand. Yeah, where I think we're going to get a lot of information. I think that preliminary brief. Yeah, I think we're going to get a lot more information. And I think a lot of the questions in these few episodes are going to get answered in the preliminary hearing. Is that just to hear that there's 40 terabytes of, yeah, evidence?

“Can I imagine how much is how much they've gathered?”

And another thing, just to clarify some talk on Reddit and online, WDDA Beth Silverman stated that she plans to set a trial date within the next 60 days. I have seen some people confusing that with saying that we're going to go to trial in the next 60 days. I think that's just setting a date. Yeah, and that data is probably going to be years from now. That is if there is a trial. I mean, I think the judge is obviously

the preliminary hearing is going to go in favor of the prosecution. There's going to be a trial. But that's if David doesn't plead guilty. Yes. Is that a possibility? I don't think so. I don't think the DA is going to give him any sort of plea deal that he would like.

And this is his career as with all DA's and he definitely needs to prove himself.

“He has some not great wins under his belt already. Some criticism under his belt. So I mean,”

this is a huge case. I don't think they're going to even make a plea deal. That he would take.

Yeah. And I just don't see him pleading guilty. I mean, I could be proven wrong. But usually,

“people like David don't plead guilty. Because I mean, what would he get out of pleading guilty?”

He'd rather probably just take his chances. It's not like he cares about if he's going into

debt paying for his attorney or his parents are going into debt paying for his attorney. Well, okay. But yeah. So I will keep you guys updated once the preliminary hearing starts.

“And obviously with the future trial, when and if that occurs. But what are your thoughts on this case?”

Let me know in the comments. So with that, be safe. And I will see you in the next one.