Amanda Carpenter, Sarah Longwell, & Sam Stein: Trump Gives His Family a Free Pass to Crime

Now it is time to eat. The best way to eat is to eat a gratis.

“The people who have been in cheese, cheese, cheese.”

Now to the gratis. Time for 18 years. The coffee and the coffee and the coffee is ready. Only a long time. It is time to eat.

Hello, welcome to the board of podcasts. I am your host Tim Miller. We are the quasi-double header for you today. In segment two, it is some of the live show in San Diego last night. I was on stage with my board colleagues.

I am Stine and Sarah Longwell. We talked about the latest in Iran. We are going to do an Argo Style plot to put Mahmoud Ahmedina's job in charge of the country. We also discussed how Bill Cassidy is starting to sound like a bull work contributor all the sudden. It is a good little discussion.

So stick around for that in segment two.

But first, formally at the bull work,

she is now a writer and editor at ProtectDemocracy.org. They got a subset called if you can keep it. It is all caps. Amanda Carpenter. Hi.

Hello. How are you? I am doing good. Thank you for doing this. You know, the people want some actual podcasting every day.

They want some really deep thoughts from observers of our democratic condition. And so I appreciate that you are offering that. It is basically just you today. I am just going to be throwing up softballs to you. Let's go.

Let's do it. I want to start by talking about what you are calling on social media. The right reward program. Everybody is just bouncing around different names. We are going to land on one.

You know, I was trying to call it reparations for whites. Do you have your name and try it yesterday? Run us through the timeline of how we got here because I do think that we have had some kind of development over the last few days on it.

Well, first, I do appreciate all the people brainstorming good names for this.

Because if I hear people keep calling it the settlement or the slush fund, I'm going to scream, right? Like, there's lots of good things you can call it. You can do rye rewards. I was kind of going around with henchmen bailout, but I have landed on thug fund.

I think thug fund really gets it the idea. That's who is going to be getting these grants if they do come to fruition. But aside from the branding, which actually is important. Like, let's please call something that accurately describes it. Because it is absolutely not a settlement.

“One of the ways that you have to think about how this came about,”

which, you know, isn't important to the discussion that we're going to have about why it's so unpopular and wrong. But the reason this came about, if you even want to call it a reason, is that Donald Trump's tax returns were leaked, right? That was bad.

Lots of people's tax returns were leaked. Like, there's a whole, like, pro-publican investigation. We remember that. But the conclusion that Trump and the Department of Justice have come to is that because that bad thing happened and which there is recourse and which the leaker was prosecuted

is facing the consequences of that behavior. They've decided I want two things. Which you don't, like, this isn't the thing that you get to make a deal with the DOJ over this about, like, what kind of reward that you want. We want two things.

We want a free pass for all future tax climbing forever and ever. Apparently, and the $1.7 billion dollar thug fund to give money to all my henchmen and cronies. None of these things are related. Like, we just pause on that for a second.

Tax returns being leaked does not mean Donald Trump gets $1.7 billion to throw around as Trump bucks for his friends. Like, that, I feel like the news cycle didn't really pause on that enough and Todd Blanch wasn't, you know, he was on Capitol Hill the other day.

That connection that tenuous connection was never explored.

“But then, if you want to rewind back just a little bit further, people are kind of”

surprised that this idea of Jsex reparations came out of the blue. No, it didn't. It absolutely did not. This has been a part of the whole pardon discussion they had since Donald Trump was campaigning for the 2020 election.

This has always been on the table. And people who brought it up, you know, the Republican allies that he had some places like the Hill would dismiss it just like they thought the pardon's were crazy. Like, oh, that's never going to happen. Ed Martin, Eagle Ed Martin was running around talking about reparations on podcasts

with Benny Johnson, you know, how the Jsex rioters deserve Justin. And like, oh, that's crazy talk. Oh, well, here we are. Here we are $1.7 billion dollars later. And I do have optimism.

This is so politically toxic that I do think it can and will be stopped. But it's kind of funny.

Representative Fritz Patrick, who came out against it very strongly, which I was delighted to see his, his, his, his interviews. Well, we have to kind of track down where this pool money came from and where the appropriations are because they have no idea. No idea.

And so that's just another wrinkle in this whole crazy subject. But I've talked enough. One more thing, I just, I thought it was important that I saw, I wanted to say that Congressman Mike Levin at here in California, actually, who's posting about this.

You think about the timeline is this like stupid, frivolous lawsuit that the president was filing against his own government. For 10 million. The IRS did actually go through the process that you would go through in this sort of case, right?

Like they wrote a memo laying out the defenses about why they shouldn't have to pay out the suit. They listed that Trump filed suit late. Trump's own lawyer was in court when the leaker put guilty in October 2023 more than two years before Trump sued.

You know, so like there was legal justice for this already. Like before the suit even started,

the justice department themselves never actually showed up to court.

Never argued the other side. And this is kind of crazy like fuck off. You're like talking about this. It's like there's two parts of Trump's government arguing against each other.

“But like that's how it would work, right?”

In an actual if there was Trump was suing the IRS, like the Justice Department then would give their argument on the other side. They never did that. The judge got suspicious and ordered both sides to explain like whether they were opposing each other or just colluding

and asked for the brief on that from both sides. And the day before it was due was when the Justice Department announced the Doug fund, right? Like I think that that is also important. Like context of how this happened, right?

Like it was all. I mean, I'll know that it was WWE like K-Fade fake the whole time. But it's like, you know, they made it as blatant as possible. That this was all fake all pretext for getting money to hand out to the J-Sexers and maybe maybe some others.

Yeah, and any other lawsuit. You're not allowed to sue yourself. I mean, that's not a thing. Like I am anti-carbonate. I'm going to take a anti-carbonate record for damages from a company.

It's not a thing. That's essentially what Donald Trump is doing here. But another thing I want to pause on. The idea that Donald Trump was harmed. I'm not saying leaking his tax returns were great

or that should have been done. Or I'm having any defense of what happened in that scenario.

But he is arguably the single most powerful man on the earth.

What harm has he suffered?

“But generally, like, what business is he not doing?”

What money is he not making? And what in any way is there any harm that's being inflicted on him as he enjoys the greatest political position in the world? I don't understand. The thing that happened this morning, this is from Trump Punch Bowl.

As you mentioned, Fitzpat, Brian Fitzpatrick, on the Hill, set a strongly word of letter to Todd Blanch. We'll see where that goes. There's been some other pushback, even from Republican senators. Bill Cassidy.

We talked about this in a second. Be a little bit. So the White House, I guess, felt like they needed to at least offer some explanation of the Hill. They sent a one page over there about the fund.

It says that the fund will have no partisan restriction. But then, my favorite part is, like, is a little bribed. Any Republican senators who are feeling on the fence about this? It does say that any senators whose records were secretly

subpoenaed by the Biden DOJ. They're also eligible to apply. So there you go. Here's a little, it's kind of wet in the beak of Republican senators who feel like they might have been harmed.

Yeah, I don't know if you remember, but during the funding fight it wasn't last year. There was a provision to allow members whose phone records were subpoenaed in the Arctic Frost investigation

“to get up to, I think, $500,000 payout from the government.”

So this is kind of refreshing that and saying, "Okay, we're going to make this very cool and legal now." And now there's no cap on the amount. So why not? You know, I think there was nine Republican senators

that were possibly eligible for that. It was like Lindsey Graham, surprised. But yeah, so maybe they can just get that now. And it was so controversial. It was struck out of the bill.

Yeah, right. But now, hey, alcohol only. Yeah, no, it was actually the house over say, "Damn, there's another shout-out to Robert Garcia and Suha's super money." And like, caught that. Actually, it was like really a deduct into a bill.

And then that became this thing and they took it out

and now they're going back for a second fight at that apple.

You mentioned also, the other thing I want to focus on because I don't think I've gotten to it on the pod is the other element of this settlement. So called settlement was in addition to the thug fund was Trump and his family becoming immune

I don't really think that's how things work

in the country where I know that's, I guess, how it worked for Jeffrey Epstein. That was part of the deal that he got with Alex Acosta, who he was immune for a bunch of other crimes. But generally speaking, in America,

if you commit a crime, no matter whether you're the president or part of the president's family or one of the president's friends, like you still can be prosecuted for that crime, just like a regular person. But they're trying to immune themselves.

The IRS is, quote, forever, barred and precluded from pursuing, quote, examinations of Trump or related or affiliated individuals or their trusts or their businesses. I truly insane.

So if you try to follow through line, there is no connection between the remedies that he's asking for in the original harm. So what is this really about? What I think this deal is really about

is protecting his position and power not only through the midterms and the 2020 election, whatever he decides to do, but post presidency as well. Why else would you be asking for

permanent legal immunity? Not only for all the crimes you committed to the White House with the Supreme Court, so thoughtfully gave him but for any kind of tax liability for all your businesses and family?

“To me, that's what this is really about.”

And it's truly crazy. You know, you hate to do the counterfactuals but like when there was all the question of the Clinton crime family, you know, like had Bill Clinton and there said,

like, you know what? What my DOJ has decided is that me and Hillary can do whatever we want and perpetuity

and that the IRS could never investigate us again.

I like that's what they're trying to do. It's like it's totally insane. You call that I think autocratic entrepreneurship. And like that is, it is important to discuss like this element of it

because it's tied to like the Trump family corruption. That he is trying to ensure can perpetuate forever. No matter what happens, they can do it while they're in power right now.

They're making a lot of money. But then in the future it's like they can continue to do whatever kind of corrupt deals they want without any concern. Yeah, this idea of Trump as an autocratic entrepreneur

and his plans post presidency. Like, listen, it's a question. Will he stay or will he go? His plans for the ballroom essentially turning it's really a bunker.

Like, can we be real? I don't know if you've seen the videos of him lately where he's standing outside promising how great it's going to be and the gift that he's going to get future presidents.

And oh, by the way, we're going to have a drone empire on top of the White House. So we're not having a ballroom. We're having a drone empire that is essentially going to what?

Turn the White House into some kind of military base where he's going to have drones flying around to protect him. Maybe there's a chance he's really freaked out about the wars he's starting and

retribution that might be coming for him. There have been, you know, asked assassination attempts on him several times not only from domestic actors, but foreign.

“So who knows what's actually going through his head?”

But regardless of what he's thinking, what he is doing is insulating himself in so many ways inside the White House as a bunker. That again, I'm glad that there's Senate opposition to the ballroom and the funding for it.

But how does he have the funding now? I mean, he's sitting there literally as, like, there's jack hammers and, like, stuffing thrown around, like, the White House is a giant construction pit

and they're like, well, maybe we'll stop the funding for it. Well, maybe I ought to do something now. That said, you look at the bunker. You look at the immunity that he's pursuing on all angles.

You look at the things that he's setting himself up or like the board of peace in which he's the forever chairman. The untold amount of corruption that we still fail to understand, explain, and confront adequately. He's setting himself and his family up to be shielded

for decades if we don't do something about it now to stop it while he's still in office. The other line that you had talking about all this types of corruption that I think sort of unites everything as a question of audit the White House.

And I think that is pretty good, because I mean, as you mentioned about the ballroom of funding, like Bill Caste was saying, the Hill hasn't even seen. They haven't provided anything.

What are the plans? You know, what are the specs for this? And I think that, you know, I've had Robert Garcia and Sue Hassan, like, what should the Democrats do next year?

“And I think something that kind of unites everything”

is audit the White House and audit the Trump family. Yeah, audit the White House, we know there's untold amounts of corruption going on. And audit the Fed, I think,

was actually a politically powerful issue

for Republican primaries back in the day. Audit the White House should be that much more powerful, because Donald Trump is so clearly trying to evade that accountability right now

from any audits in the future.

Now there's cheese. The White House is one of the largest companies in the world. And now there's cheese. Now there's cheese. Now there's cheese.

Now there's cheese. Now there's cheese. You posted about your optimism on this, on some of the things you're seeing on the Hill, and you've alluded to a little bit,

I'm going to read your, your skeet. I'm not trying to blow smoke up anyone's behind. Because we don't do that on the podcast. But there is some decent opposition to Trump happening in the Hill, no save act, ballroom, funding plummeting,

Iran war vote, not firing the parliamentarian, growing opposition to the henchmen bailout. Tom Tillis, this morning called that thug fund. Tier any and stupid on stilts. So that some leveled his revenge tour is potentially causing some limitations on,

you know, his, his autocratic aspirations. Yeah, I have no illusions that the Republicans on their own would do anything to confront or stop Trump from pursuing these items. But if it becomes so politically toxic, and the Democrats, the media, voters,

don't allow them to escape the issue. I actually think there's a chance. I mean, there's too much coming down upon them. Donald Trump's polling is in the basement right now. They all know this.

And I do think the back to back endorsement of Ken Paxton over John Kornin, and then the thug fund details coming out. That had a weird back to back dynamic that I do think caused more anger on the Hill than usual.

“I think they thought he was going to stay out of the Texas race.”

But then endorsing Ken Paxton and sending a member potentially to the Senate. So it was so clearly ethically flawed over someone who has been there. How long has John Kornin been there? I think a number of members took more personally in a way that, you know, the defeat of like a Tom Tillis or Bill Cassidy didn't have.

Yeah, I think it was a mistake, Paxton was going to win. I could pull a key mount yesterday or two days ago that was in the field before the Trump endorsement. And Paxton was up eight. Like Paxton was going to win, Trump did not have to do this.

And he was going to get what the result he wanted anyway. This is, again, the megalomanian and narcissism and how that can backfire sometimes. It's like he wanted his endorsement record to continue to be 100%. I think he was the reason why he did this.

I think he's created potentially a well-carded Kornin himself, adding him to Tillis and Cassidy and Mercastion and Collins and McConnell at various different times, people that could oppose him. But maybe even some others who were just pissed about the Kornin treatment.

“Yeah, I think there's a potential for this group of disaffected Republican senators.”

I actually do something on the way out. And let's put Tom Massey in that category, right? I mean, in his concession speech, he essentially said, "I have seven more months left. Now, you can like Tom Massey or hate him, but he's got some fight in him."

And he's the reason the Epstein files got released, ultimately. But I don't know. I think the Massey defeat is so interesting because, you know, we've gone through this with the media keeps wanting to, like, put this fight between maga and the moderates,

or maga and never Trump.

That's, like, that was never quite, and Tom Massey's

lost shows that Bixie was trying to turn out this America first course, right? Where he was with Trump on everything. Did a lot of, like, kind of nasty stuff, but broke with Trump on two issues. Epstein and the Iran War. You could put M.T.G. in that category, probably Lauren Bobert.

And they were dismissed as treasonous. Massey's race became the most expensive house primary in history, because they just rang down dollars on him in support of this, you know, maga, kind of, stewed Canada. It says nothing, but I'm with Trump, I'm with Trump, I'm with Trump.

And the idea that there's any kind of principle difference between Trump is just a fart. He doesn't want anyone except for lackeys and people like Ken Paxton, who are so ethically flawed and will do anything for him. Like, that's the ideal candidate.

That's always been what he wanted.

I think this sort of proves that the America first, tight rope that people were trying to walk is a failure. And you just have to oppose them.

“And that's what I'm hoping Massey will do in a couple of key issues on this way out.”

All right, I want to close with just to protect democracy. And all of this is in the protect democracy hat, but particularly, you know, in the narrow conversation about voting, we had just in Jones on the pod yesterday and talked a lot about getting a VRA.

And I do think that that move reopen to possibility that Republicans could take the house. So I think it's still a long shot.

“What is your kind of updated view on the midterms and, you know, concerns around elections?”

Most important thing on my mind right now is the wipeout of any remaining upstanding Republican candidates in Georgia,

and the implications that may have for 2028. Brad Raphinsberger, which is a name that I think most listeners of this podcast would recognize. He was running for governor. I got defeated by an election tonight. Our name, Bert Jones.

Raphinsberger only got 15 points in the Republican primary. It looks like there, I was reading a lower eagons. Wonderful reporting about the potential governors race shaping up. It could be a case where you have Bert Jones running against Keisha Lance bottoms.

I don't know how that one's going to shake out.

And if we lose Georgia to election deniers, that opens up in a huge can of worms. And if you look at the intense focus that the Trump White House, particularly with the Department of Justice, is had on Fulton County. The fight over Fulton County has not ended. You know, they had the FBI raid, we got the ballot boxes.

They're fighting constantly even over poll workers when it came to election day today. And I think they, the Fulton County is a test model for what they want to do. They want to manufacture fraud allegations so that they can take over democratic counties when it comes to election day. You could repeat that in other states.

“And I think Fulton County is particularly important because if you remember,”

that's where Donald Trump got arrested. The mugshot that he posts everywhere. Now, including on the Department of Justice came from that area of the country. And so I think it just really got to be on our toes educating everyone about the threats that are coming. Raising the standard for people like judges who may be presented with really problematic search warrant and things like that to get information that the Department of Justice shouldn't have.

The continued fight that they are waging to get voter data from all 50 states so that they can hand-pick people to remove from the roles. Those are the things that I'm really focused on right now as well as a number of my colleagues at protect democracy and in the tire pro democracy coalition. Anything else on your mind or anything people should be doing, you know, who are out there trying to wonder how to engage on the stuff. Just staying on it. I mean, honestly, it's going to be one of these races where it could come down to election boards and poll watchers and things like that.

But the most important thing is to be talking about these issues so that Republicans who are in positions of influence cannot escape them, right?

Because if they can make this go away, everybody's going to go away from Memorial weekend. The heat needs to stay on things like the thug fund and the ballroom through a weekend because they're all pretending this is going to blow over. It's going to go away. Maybe we'll just get a billion dollars and we'll get an appropriation later. It'll be fine. It cannot be fine. You got to keep the heat on them all through Memorial Week and all through summer, all through the fall. Appreciate you. As always, Amanda, everybody go check out their work at protectomoxy.org.

I'm sure you'll be back again soon. And everyone else stick around for me, Sarah and Sam Stein live in San Diego. Enjoy it. [Music] [Music] [Music]

[Music] [Music] I'm delighted to be here with Sam and Sarah. I don't know if we've had a three-way together on the podcast. [Music] I guess not.

“I had that Sam in the dressing room. I was like, "Did you think there'd be this much gay content?”

That's your new news job?" It's constant. A lot of gay content. A lot of gay talk. Alright, I want to start by talking about, "We're kind of in a war with Iran, I guess still. Maybe it's a little bit. We're going to do a little bit. It's not done seem to be going that well." There was a pretty shocking story from the New York Times that I want to read a little bit too.

You all, because it's a doozy. When we went into the war, we did have a plan, actually. You know, we had a plan. I could turn it out. For a del C Rodriguez type figure to take over Iran.

The person was quite surprising, though, who they had a mind. A Machmoud Akmedina shot. [Laughter]

“So, for those of you who were around, you know, before 2016,”

he didn't really love your people, Sam, Akmedina shot. I don't think he liked ours that much either. Not a big fan of ours. The audacious plan according to the New York Times was developed by the Israelis. Mr. Akmedina shot have been consulted about this.

But it quickly went awry when he was injured on the war's first day by an Israeli strike at his home in Tehran.

It feels like a little mistake to kind of bomb the house of the person that you're trying to make the new leader. He was there on a house arrest. He survived the strike. He's injured, but he became disillusioned with the regime change plan. [Laughter] And he's not been seen publicly since then. His current wearabouts and condition are unknown.

[Laughter] Feels like a miss, Sam. I don't know. [Laughter] Well, the first of all, I feel like this fully dispels this notion that the Jews are orchestrating everything. Because that's the worst plan.

[Laughter] I've ever heard. I mean, if you think about it, I mean, Baris that Jews came up with this plan. [Laughter] Just step back and think about it. The idea here was we were going to bomb his complex with such precision that he would escape.

And he would escape, unscathed, and be totally fine with the fact that we nearly killed him with the bomb. And then go out somewhere and get the big popular movement behind him and then that would win the war.

I mean, I wish I could be in the room where people were talking this through.

And no one was asking follow-up questions.

“Like, how does this work? Like, what step two are people going to follow this guy?”

Do we like this guy? Is this our guy? Yeah, feels like you were missing the bigger point here. No, I think that's the point. I mean, that's the point. I mean, that's the point. That's the point.

That's the point. The Jews thought, I forget. What does he think about the Holocaust? Oh, that it didn't happen. I don't know why I'm yelling at you. It's not your fault.

Do this. This is how anti-Semitism happens. Yeah. I'm not responsible for this. Yes.

That is a good point. And I think it's a very valid point. But I think even getting to that point, someone had to be in a room being like, okay, look, I've been work shopping this all weekend. I've run through all the ideas.

And this is the best one we've got. And we're going to bomb his complex. And he's just going to walk out. Yeah. And he's going to be the new region.

Do we have an option B? Anything. Little to anything. I guess we didn't have one. Wait, hold on.

I got to go back to the idea of Occ Magina Jadis, the person. Not just the bombing him. This is a guy. Okay, so the whole theory rested on the idea that there would be a popular uprising. In Iran.

“Do we remember what Occ Magina Jad did to people who rose up in Iran?”

Yeah, I wasn't great. He stone them to death. Yeah. Who's going to popular uprising for Occ Magina Jad? I have a clip.

I have a thought on that Sarah. Maybe Donald Trump and BB didn't actually care about the well being of the Iranian people. And that that was. No, I think you're wrong. I can't imagine.

Maybe a front for their broader idea. Anyway, they're back to the drawing board.

And here's what we're at now.

Trump and BB had a conversation this week. BB's very upset according to his photographer at Axias. His hair was on fire over this. Trump said to Axias of BB will do whatever I want him to do. And said that the call was fine.

The current plan now is for a 30 day letter of intent. That's nice. The U.S. and Iran would sign it. And then we'd have a 30 day period of negotiations on issues like Iran's nuclear program and the opening of the Strait of Hormuz.

Which kind of sounds like we're currently out. Yeah. So I'm not sure what we're going to do, exactly. This is for 30 days not to wicks. But we are in a ceasefire, right?

Technically. So this is just a 30 day extension. And how is this different, the letter of intent, different from the memorandum of understanding like they're just using a thosaurus, right? That's what they're doing.

Yeah. They're just using different words. So the operation sledgehammer, we're going to delay operation sledgehammer. The project freedom. It's just, who's coming up with this stuff?

Pete Hankseth. And it's so weird that it's not well thought out. He's like, "I'm going to do a keg stand." And then we're going to bomb the Medinajad.

was making a weekend talk show co-host, the Secretary of Defense.

I don't know before that. It was taking a game show host, making him the president of the United States. I remember, do you remember where you were when you found out it was going to be heg-south because I do. I remember.

I was in a very dark place. We're all kind of in a dark place now. But I was in an acutely dark place. Like literally. It was dark as night.

Like a movie theater? No, I was thinking about medication, self-medication. My life choice is self-hot. And I was driving to go meet somebody for dinner. And I was doing what you're not supposed to do.

But in New Orleans, the roads are so bad that you can't really go more than like 18 miles an hour. So oftentimes I am tweeting and you're driving. This is probably going to come back to hunting me. If I ever get into an accident, then I just said that on the podcast, but whatever. And I was like scrolling Twitter while driving down for Ed Street.

And the text came in.

And I was like, oh my god.

And I went and I was about to go to dinner. And my dinner mate had not checked their phone. And I was like, I got one for you. Pete Heg-south is going to be the Secretary of Defense. And they're like, no.

Let me see your phone. I was like, it's fucking real. I get to be the bear of the news. And that's real good. And so even in that moment of levity.

Hold on. Were you more shocked by that? Because I remember feeling really shocked by that. But then I felt like almost paralyzed when I heard cash but tell. I was just like, that cannot be.

That cannot be. No, that can't be. Yeah. The cash we're telling was working for some reason. I just, I got into that place with the Heg-south thing.

But I got the uncontrollable laughter.

“You know, it's just kind of like, what can you do in this moment?”

Except just really laugh at this is the state of affairs. And so I think it was kind of predictable. That is where we'd end up. The one other Iran news. I think it was there on Israel news.

It's kind of interesting. And that's related to your people. Sam was Trump's comments today. I don't know if you saw this. He was doing a little press conference outside the plane.

And we said, I'm right now at 99% approval in Israel. [ Laughter ] I could run for Prime Minister. So maybe after I do this, I'll go to Israel and run for Prime Minister. [ Cheers and applause ]

Why wait? Why is everybody cheering? Why wait? I think they want him out of our country. We want him to go be Prime Minister of Israel.

He's so much more popular there. Right? I mean, he wouldn't have all these annoying reporters, Sam Stein on morning Joe, making fun of him. You know, he would have, you'd go to a place where he's appreciated.

Yeah, and he can do a lot of good there. Like, it would become the Trump Western Wall. You know, rebranding opportunities are abundant. Yeah. There has been a lot of damage from all the woods.

So you're doing a lot of rebuilding. Yeah. It's a triumph in arch.

“How is the Gaza Reconstruction project going about?”

He could oversee it. Not great for the, you know, people of Palestine, obviously, but they're not cycling that well for them anyway. I don't. Not that funny.

It's a little, that's a little dark. But I have so many jokes about Trump running Israel, but I can't tell any of them because they're really bad. Like, was one of them related to cars for kids or now? No, not that bad.

Jesus. No, I was just thinking, like, I don't know, Israel's the one making our foreign policy. Decisions now. So why would it be better having Trump over there?

Anyway. Trump's off to Israel, hopefully. Um, any other ram thoughts before I move on to something that has, that had, had my dandruff on the flank plane here? I just don't think it's going well.

Me neither. Do you see a path out? What's like the best case scenario for you at this point, Sam? We've talked about this. Um, there's really not one, right?

Like, the status quo just continues. Is that like the most likely scenario? Probably?

“Here, here's the thing about a 30 day pause.”

That is, that is kind of a worst case scenario. I understand what Trump wants to be able to say that it's over.

But the problem is is that that just like,

it's another month out of uncertainty. It's a, because because what around's not going to dismantle their nuclear weapons, they've been very clear on this. And also, they've realized now that they can run the straight-up for moves. And we can't do anything about it.

And so what is a month get us other than, for the, just thinking about it in the political context of America, getting us closer to the mid-terms and still no resolution? Yeah. And it makes us negotiating position weaker.

And I guess it's kind of true on both sides. You know, I think the Iranians, right? I mean, economic problems. But, you know, we had a vote in the Senate.

It didn't go Trump's way.

The House vote, Jared Golden, who's the one Democrat. Yeah, the voted with the Republicans on this, said that he's flipping just a couple hours ago. So, yeah, finally. So, like maybe clap it up.

Please clap for Jared Golden. Now, that was not really. Yeah. But so the war powers situation, Congress is, you know, isn't looking as good.

And obviously every day this goes on the gas prices are up. It isn't looking as good. I mean, like, his leverage is tanking. And then you out onto that. So, you know, there's been reporting that Iran has been able to sort of reconsider some of its missiles. Yeah.

Obviously, they've shown that they can control the straight. There's rumors that they're getting help from the Chinese and the Russians. The longer you keep this going, the more and boldened they become. The leverage points we had were this blockade.

“But if that gets resolved, then what are we doing here?”

And I guess we've talked about this a lot, but I guess it's just sort of worth stressing, which is there's no way out for him that isn't embarrassing, right? Like, the most obvious way out is he cuts a deal that is just sort of a variation of what Obama did in 2014. Yeah, probably worse. Probably worse.

Probably worse. Yeah, that would be the best case scenario. Yeah, because in this case, they, you're right. I mean, the new deal would involve probably some sort of toll on the straight, which was open. And he can't, I mean, he could do it and just take his lumps, but it would be a humiliation.

And so I just think we're stuck with this terrible status quo. In 30 days with these gas prices rising, it's bad. I mean, it's really bad. I'm glad you mentioned the Chinese, though, because this is actually, they are helping Iran. And the Chinese desperately want us to stay in a low simmering war with Iran, because it continues to elevate them as the world's superpower.

While we're mire down in these silly wars. Like, this is, like, whatever, I say it all the time. But this is just, we're committing superpowers suicide in real time. Yeah. Are we happy about that or in that?

Um, yeah. And he got mugged for the heart of the Chinese. OK. Now there's cheese. A new Kenos Grigasi of the Kirstlich-Lachkezi Shmeckt. I'll talk to you about the thing that I was very upset about the plane.

“Anybody have a chance to watch "Squark Box" this morning?”

I was stuck on an airplane, so I was watching a little bit of "Squark Box." Jeff Bezos was on. And I was so angry. You guys don't like your Amazon? Yeah, you've all canceled your prime.

Yeah. I do like a prime. But I was so mad about what I'm about to show you that I literally googled "Fuck Jeff Bezos T-shirt." And I purchased one off of Bobble. So you want to be seeing that?

I purchased that somewhere over New Mexico. Did you buy it off of Amazon? No. Um, let's watch Jeff Bezos is assessing how he thinks Trump's doing. When I last interviewed him, he was about two years ago.

President Trump had just won. He was not the president yet. And I had asked him what he thought of him at the time. And you said that you thought that he had mellow, that he was Comer. Yeah. And I'm curious now, here we are.

Yeah. I still think that two years later. Yeah. We've had lots of wars and tariffs and all sorts of things that have happened since then. What do you think?

I think he has, I mean, I'm comparing him to his first term.

Yeah. And I think he's a more mature, more disciplined version of himself than he was in his first term. Trump has lots of good ideas. And he's done a lot of good right about a lot of things.

“You have to give him credit where credit is due.”

Yeah, more mature, more disciplined. He's got a lot done a lot of good things. And you got to hand it to him. I don't know. Okay.

So I have two questions. What earth is Jeff Bezos on? And where are the peptides that he's getting? Where's the getting the peptides from? Because he does have a new look.

Sarah? Okay.

So here's the thing about what he says mature.

Does he mean, does he mean so old that his skin is falling off of his body? And he's decomposing in front of us? What does mature mean? I would Aaron Ross Sorkin. He's very cute.

But I would love. I just want to be on the other side of that interview to be like, give me one example of his maturity. Give me what is one thing that Donald Trump has done. What? He said, like, he's been, you got to admit, got to hand it to him.

He's been right about a lot.

What has he been right about? I'm not even, I'm not even playing for clerks. I'm genuinely curious. I'm trying to think. Was he right about the tariffs?

Which? Was he right about the Melania document? Yes. Oh, no, no, no. Like, is he right about the Warren Iran?

Has he been right about the slush fund that he's built to be corrupt? Like, what is the thing that he's been right about? What is going well that J. Fezos could point to? I guess the tax cuts for people like him, but other than that, there is nothing. Also, I love how Jeff Bezos was like, "Uh, what is happening with his love?"

He's so big. I mean, it definitely is not in nature. Like, whatever happened to him did not happen in nature, right? And he's a whole different person. Like, usually your neck doesn't expand three X after 50.

I don't think, I don't know. Maybe some of you guys don't feel that has happened to. Sam, where were you at on?

“You have to give him credit where credit is too.”

Well, I don't think you do. The thing about the... You also mentioned outreach to the Mulani docks. Yeah, I just want to set that. He was asked about the Mulani docks.

Jeff Bezos said this, "It appears it was a good business decision. It did very well in theatres. It's done very well in streaming. People are very curious about Mulania. So even though I had nothing to do with it,

it appears the Amazon team made a very wise business decision." So, we had the bowl work looked into this. It looked into the numbers.

It cost 75 million to produce and market.

It made $16 million. Which I'm not a mathematician, but I think it's a loss. And the idea that Jeff Bezos had nothing to do with this documentary, a 75 million dollar expenditure on his company, involving obviously a very important person the President's wife,

is just... it does... it defies logic. I think he's kind of full of shit. And in all seriousness, you know, like no one made him do this interview, right? Like he didn't have to go out there and be obsequious, but we're in a place now where these tucked tightens,

especially, but you know, leaders of industry across the board. They just feel even at this moment where Trump said, like 37% approval and everyone is just tired of the stick, that they still have to go out there and do these interviews. And it's just flabbergasting to me.

You would think at some point, they would say, "I've had enough." Just don't say anything. Just don't go out there.

Well, he almost never says anything.

I know that what was the point of this?

“Yeah, that's what I'm curious. Why did he feel the need to go out there?”

He wants to use humiliating himself because he wants rocket contracts. Well, let me just add this, because he did say this on a substantive level. He talked, I mean, he was going out for this policy provision that he's got, which is he thinks the bottom 50th percentile of earners in the country should pay zero federal income tax. I'm not going to quibble with that, whatever.

But he refused to say, he refused to say that people in his bracket should pay more. He said, "That's a good policy to pay to have in the future." He had very firm decisions on one, but not on the other. And he refused to talk about the largest in the contracts that Amazon gets from the government, from Donald Trump specifically.

And so I think that is just, you know, it's funny shit. And he said, "If you tax me more, it's not going to help the teacher in Queens at all." And I'm like, "I don't know, maybe we should try it." Here's the text I sent. Sarah's not going to like this.

As I was live watching this on American Airlines today, I texted my husband the following. I'm going to have a stroke over this Jeff Bezos interview on CNBC. Five minutes later, 65 AM. I'm a socialist now. [ Laughter ]

I'm just, I'm like, I was like sitting there, boiling over. I'm thinking about like, what kind of creative punishments can we have for Jeff Bezos in 2029? Because I feel like -- He has to watch the Melania documentary over and over and over again.

I feel like the next DOJ. Maybe you do, what did he say about Trump?

“You have to give him credit where credit is due.”

He has been very good at shaking down corporate leaders for money. And so maybe we should take a page out of that book and start with Jeff Bezos. Next time.

A $1.8 billion shake down.

Yeah. I will just say -- I would watch a Melania documentary about why she gave that weird press conference about how Epstein definitely didn't introduce her to Donald. That's the only Melania documentary I want to see. That is still -- we still don't know why she gave that.

That is such a good point.

I'll just move down. Yeah. Okay. Thanks for telling us, Melania. Good to know.

I wish you could have perhaps that clip because I could just watch it right now. I could have just watched the press conference again. I want to talk about bull work build capacity really quick. It's great. It's awesome.

My senator from Louisiana who's been awful for the last five years. All of a sudden he's talking a lot. He kind of sounds like build crystal.

“Honestly, let me just give you a couple of things he's done lately.”

He's voting against the $1 billion ballroom project.

He went on at length about how they haven't given any specs for it. They haven't gone to Congress and shown what exactly they're going to spend the money on. All miss the specs. He's upset about the specs. He defended his vote to convict Trump in 2021.

He called -- he called Ken Paxton a felon after Trump endorsed him. He voted in support of the Dam's war powers resolution on Iran. And now he sent this tweet a couple hours ago very long. I'm not going to make you read the whole thing. But there's one section I do want to read.

If you'll allow me. The American people do not expect perfection from their leaders. But they do expect seriousness. Leaders who are steady, not erratic. Thoughtful, not impulsive.

Their words should lower the temperature rather than inflamed division. Their action should place the long-term interests of the country above short-term personal gain. Leadership is not using power to serve your own needs. It's using power to serve the needs of others. If someone does not understand this, they should not hold a position of leadership.

Who do we think he might be talking about? Say his name, Bill Cassidy. But Sarah, you posted about this. What is it about?

The fact that the second these guys political careers are over.

They start sounding totally indistinguishable from the 6 p.m. hour on MSNow. You know, it was nice that you guys were clapping for Bill Cassidy as he has suddenly found religion and said, "Oh no, now that I don't have a job anymore, I'm going to do the right thing." But I do not feel that way. And here's my overall, the fact, first of all, it's telling about our politics.

That the second that you don't have to win an election, you suddenly do what you think is right. And what you think is right is obviously to stand up to Donald Trump, right? That is obviously what Bill Cassidy knows to be true. And I have this fight with friends of mine sort of in the democracy space who wanted to help Bill Cassidy and support Bill Cassidy. They're like, "This guy voted for impeachment, we should support him."

“And that is a position that I think six or seven years ago I would have endorsed, right?”

Like, you do have to show up for these guys, but I don't know if you saw Bill Cassidy's ads. There is, you know? It's just him talking about how much he loves Trump and how much Trump loves him.

And so I think that there is basically no more pernicious being in our politics than people who know better,

who know what Donald Trump is doing, and don't do it when it matters. The only good thing I'll say, the only good thing I'll say about Cassidy is, I do think it is interesting the way that Trump has gone on this geod, against anybody who opposed him, right? Those people have seven more months in office.

And something that I think Democrats should do, I don't have to be happy about Bill Cassidy. I'm in a fuck Bill Cassidy mode. That guy voted, that guy voted, he is the reason that RFK is currently presiding over our health. Okay? He betrayed everything he knew to be true and good in order to try to get that sentence seat.

And I think that if you're going to go, he should have the second that he took that vote. He had six years in office.

“He could have done so much over the last six years that he's not doing, but okay?”

He's got seven months now. They are a number of people who Trump has gone after. Massey too, they should vote against Donald Trump every single time. Democrats should go grab them and say, I would like this yellow seven months, like, let's do this. Let's do something.

And I think that that is an offensive way to use somebody like Bill Cassidy, who wants to make it right with him and his God, right? He needs to unburden himself and like tell us too. Like there's a caucus now that you can go to and say, let's defeat everything this guy does.

And I think Trump is going to live to regret how hard he wanted these guys. You know, in court and Sam, why don't you jump it on that? Because I think this is very meaningful as far as them being able to get anything passed this year. Yeah, I agree 100% with everything you just said, but whoever yelled it's too little too late. You're right, it's too little too late.

And I think there's something horrible, awful irony that this is happening with this Ebola outbreak in Africa,

I mean, because we are in a situation right now where our main healthcare leaders and officials are cranks and conspiracists,

“where we've gutted our own healthcare administration and we've retreated from the global healthcare community,”

in very serious ways, extremely serious ways. Our colleague Jonathan Cohen had an article the other night about what the cuts to USA mean for the Ebola fight in Africa. And it is substantial. That was the front line of our resistance to Ebola in 2014. It is just not there because it was cut.

Okay. Yeah. And I don't think it's unfair to say that in the effort to save his own political fortunes, the failed effort to save his own political fortunes, Bill Cassidy's vote for Afghani and your killed people.

It absolutely killed people. And so he has to live with that for the rest of his life. And whether he can go Yola for seven months, great. Have had it. But that doesn't absolve the damage that has been done in the people whose lives have been lost because the decisions that he made. What's your my Ebola concern level B right now?

New Orleans feels like most likely landing five. You don't need to be too concerned. I'm not concerned. I mean look, this is a serious outbreak.

This is the third most pernicious Ebola outbreak in history.

And this is only a couple weeks in. Okay. So this is nothing to scoff at.

“Fortunately, the disease spreads in ways that you have to have.”

I don't want to get too technical. You just got to get in touch with the saliva and the blood and all that stuff. You should be worried. Yeah. Okay. Nevermind. Long story short. It's a big international problem.

And that will of course affect the United States. But the idea that they're being outbreak in the United States is pretty small. Noted. Okay. Look into the dental dams. I did think.

Yeah. I do think that.

No lesbian in the history of the universe has ever been a dental dam.

I do think. I do think it's going to be really hard for an independence budget this year and I think that the ball room and the arch and all that is in real threat. Did you see the arch? Okay. You must have missed the story. It happened like two hours ago. There's citing a law passed a hundred years ago to say that Congress has authorized the construction of the arch today.

Hmm. Oh, there it is. It's just going to go and do the arch. Kind of similar to the latest Supreme Court ruling on the voting rights. It's only 70 years ago.

So I just this also just happened. But I don't know if you guys saw this. This jumps out of me because Brian Fitzpatrick is from my hometown Pennsylvania. Trump is attacking him. And Fitzpatrick is now leading the charge in Congress to get the slush fund taken away.

Yeah. Which. Again, this is more just. Trump's retribution to or I wanted to backfire on him.

“And I think him going after a swing vote like Fitzpatrick, who also he is now running on a pose on the Republican side.”

He doesn't have a primary. And so he wanted a Kamala plus three or four district. And so him taking on Trump right now is actually politically advantageous for him to hold onto his seat. But there are with him and Massey like we are now. It's fine.

But we're still putting together enough numbers to protect. I'm sorry. I want the slush. I want the slush. - I did too, I'm just saying, Brian Fitzpatrick wrote a strongly word letter and we'll see how that turns out.

- I know, there was part of me that said, "Oh, a letter, that'll show them." - Speaking of Fitzpatrick, Sam suggested that we rank the which Republican cock was the most pathetic. And their handling of Donald Trump over the past 10 years. - Is it a ranking or do we just pick something up? - What are you going to pick the word? - I'm providing list of nominees.

We'll throw Fitzpatrick in there and we'll see if he can find his way out. John Linnon. - Like Graham. - Anyway, just the parameters here. These are people who I've chosen people who either lost office or will lose office.

- Yeah. - So that doesn't include them. - These are people who their political career has ended, and they left Ignoboli. - You know, our boy Adam Kensinger's not on there.

- Right. It's people who left with their tail-tock still groveling to Trump. Here we go. - John Cornan. Big bad John Cornan. Bill Cassidy.

I can't believe you put our girl MTG on here, poor MTG. Like Pence. - That's a bad nomination. - Nikki Haley. Chris Christie.

- And some other good ones. Bob Corker. Do you guys have somebody in mind?

- I have my choice. - Okay, let's hear it. - I think John Cornan. - Yeah, let's hear it.

“- Well, because like, what was his transgression exactly?”

He did nothing to like fuck with Trump.

I think at one point he was like, well, I would do something differently than that. And that was like literally all it took. And then Trump endorses Ken fucking Paxton. Like the most miserable human being ever to run for office. The most ethically challenged individual in politics.

That's a humiliation. I don't think any one of these other people can match. - Sarah? - My most cocked Republican is not on this list. - Oh, great.

- His name is John Federman. - Oh! (laughing) - That's a curable. (laughing)

- Just kidding. Now you didn't like that choice. I wouldn't tell you guys my choice beforehand. I still like John Federman as the choice. - I'm just waiting for the drastic explanation.

- Oh, explanation.

So he's never going to win his seat.

“Like Connor Lam's going to run against him in a democratic primary.”

And it's going to be over. Which by the way, for everybody wearing a JVL is always right shirt. I would just like to say I was Connor Lam from the jump. Explain why Federman would be bad. JVL was like, "No, he's going to be the president someday."

And everybody was like, "Yeah, JVL's always right." And I would just like to know what everybody thinks now. How do you like your Federman now? (laughing) - In JVL's defense, he had a stroke immediately lost a lot of IQ points.

And all of a sudden, Donald Trump was making sense. He hangs out at Butterworth's NDC and all he does is blame Democrats for everything. And hang out with Republicans. And so, and he loves Donald Trump. And I think that he's the most cocked.

- I am sorry, you guys are both wrong. The most cocked Republican by far was Chris Christie. And he tried to win it back by running for president again and doing some good things, which was fine. But before that, Donald Trump almost killed Chris Christie with COVID.

They Donald Trump had COVID. They prepped for the debate together. Donald Trump blew his breath into Chris Christie's fat face. Christie went to the hospital. Came out of the hospital.

“And still was like, Mr. Trump, can I get you a white castle?”

- No. Chris Christie humiliating. And all you guys are a cheap date that came back around on him. I'm never forgetting. I take your point.

- Final topic for the podcast. We'll move on to the next segment. I usually don't.

I never actually play Donald Trump's voice on the podcast.

You're welcome. Because it's a live show. We're going to make an exception. Because Trump, because we're here in California. I'm sorry.

We're here in California. Well, the president of the United States had some pretty strong words about you guys. And I just, I felt like we should watch. If we had Jesus Christ come down and count the votes, I would have won California.

Because I do great with his panics. But it's a rig vote. They said that 38 million votes. Nobody knows where they're going. Of course, the Democrats are against it.

This proportionally Democrats get many more votes. Some get eight votes. They get eight cards. And Republicans have to call in ways by God. It's a rig system.

One of the most, not the worst, I'll give you a list. Maybe I'll do my list. But it's California's one of the most dishonest states for money. One of the most dishonest states in America. Nice middle finger out there.

Have any of you voted eight times? No. If Jesus Christ counted the votes, Donald Trump would have won California. His hair is looking awfully flat. Didn't his hair look weird?

He looks awful. He looks awful. I want to swear to his 20s. It's almost like he's 80 years old and too old to be the president. He looks awful.

It was an unflattering angle on that video, I will say. Making great points. Okay. That's the podcast, thanks everybody. We didn't do the fight part.

We're coming. Calm down. I'm the host. Okay. I'm here in the host chair.

The host of the flagship daily podcast. You've got your shows. Focus group. Whenever you're in charge of that. A legal news.

Have you heard of it? A legal news. Let's do an okay in the rankings. All right. That's the podcast.

Everybody will see you back here tomorrow for another edition with Mike Murphy.

And I got something to say.

My friends.

I will never lay down without a fire.

And when a tile will be the day.

“When everyone on my wrongs will be made right.”

All these I would all heal my face.

Who knows and mistakes I'll obey. The board podcast is brought to you.

“Thanks to the Lord of lead producer Katie Cooper.”

Associate producer Ansley Skipper. And with video editing by Katie Lutz. An audio engineering in editing by Jason Brown.