7-28-26 Hour 1 - Biden's Tapes and Fauci's Diary

President Trump delivered the keynote address on Friday night at the Re-Schedule White House Correspondence Association dinner.

“And let's just say, Iran's not the only thing he bombed.”

That's right, President Trump attended the White House Correspondence Association dinner and ended his speech by putting on a Trump 2028 hat. It was bad enough that he's a bully and a convicted felon, but now he's a prop comic.

Oh, bully and a convicted felon. Oh, I guess that's the label.

They always want to slam on President Trump.

This is Alex Swear, Washington Times editor at large, in for my mentor and friend Chris Plant. Still on vacation. Sailing the high seas, I hope he's having a good time. I'm honored to sit in his seat.

A little bit about me. I was pleased to join everybody yesterday, but I'm back again, which is wonderful. I have a court watch podcast over at Washington Times.com. Where I cover the latest judicial happenings

and the Supreme Court. I give you a little bit of a rundown on the latest court news every Thursday. If you subscribe there for the listserv, also have a video series over there at The Washington Times.

To sit down with Alex Swear, we interview lawmakers

and administration officials.

We have a Rick's Senator Rick Scott later this week. So something to look forward to. Also wrote a book on law fair. The intersection of politics and law, lawless law fair, it kind of chronicleizes

what happened back in 2024. I'm sure everybody remembers. And we might get a little bit into that today. I saw an interesting story about one of the pro-life protestors who was prosecuted by the Biden DOJ.

“And now I think settled with seven figures”

from the Trump DOJ, which is a positive step in the right direction for the first amendment and our protection of any sort of weaponization of our courts. But let's talk about today. So first, I thought I would touch on President Trump.

He just spoke to Fox and Friends for a little bit. He has a big day. 930, it looks like I think he has a meeting with the Ukrainian President Zelensky. After that, he, at 11, he's going to meet

with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. And then he's going to be, oh, heading over to the Capitol for Senator Lindsey Graham's funeral. And I think he's actually the one delivering the ULG. So it will be, I'm sure getting all kinds of coverage

later this afternoon. I think that's around one or two o'clock later today.

So he is a, as always, a busy man.

But he just did an interview with Fox and Friends and had a couple things I thought I'd highlight. First, he, on, on his good friend, Lindsey Graham. He mentioned, which I thought was interesting. He's never seen a war he didn't like.

That was kind of the, a big focus of the interview was Lindsey Graham as a hawk. He referred to him as that. But the president did say he was coming around essentially to encouraging some sort of deal making negotiations

with Iran. I guess realizing that something has to be done there that this can't go on forever. Also, he hit on Anthony Fauci, which it looks like from yesterday

that seems to be the viral news that was just trending everywhere is, um, Dr Anthony Fauci's diary entries. Which, um, if you're like me, you're kind of perplexed about why a, I don't know how old he is. But, um, elderly man is keeping a diary.

“I think that was something, uh, young Alex Swayer did”

in her, uh, text it when back in my parents home in Texas and Junior High, maybe that was, um, my go to kind of weird nowadays for an older man to keep a, uh, a journal, especially because it just seems like it was all about his media hits.

Um, there's some, out there. Some little takes out there about his, uh, conversations with people in the White House, um, a little bit behind the scenes action. But for the most part, what we're seeing is a man who seems to, uh,

just love the attention he was getting in almost seeking ways to get more and more of it. And, um, really kind of ripping into anybody who stood in the way between him and a camera. So, um, you know, when I read through some of these clips and I mean,

you go to X, you see him, there's all this, all this stuff out there. Um, he's going to have to testify too. I think it's tomorrow before the Senate about answer some of this stuff. Um, that sense come out. But, um, I thought, his poor wife.

Can you imagine living with a man that has that big of an ego? I mean, hopefully they social distance in the house pretty, pretty far

Uh, there was a few different takes from, um, his diaries. One was that he's gone around, if you recall, saying he wasn't responsible for lockdowns, um, he's back to away from that. But in the diary entries, it looks like he's touting, uh, and a lot of focuses on this, uh, his talks with Bill de Blasio and New York,

also, uh, someone, um, within Gavin Newson's office out in California.

And basically taking credit for them saying that they're going to shut down

the schools off of his commentary. So it looks like he, you know, behind the scenes was excited that his, um, expertise was being used to, uh, close schools shut down, um, you know, our businesses, all of that. Yet, um, in public, he was trying to deny that president Trump did go

after him during his interview this morning on Fox and friends. He said that felt she was bigger during the Biden administration. And then he was during president Trump's first administration. And he said that he left, he Trump president Trump decided to not listen to, um, some of these so-called scientific experts.

And when it had been left to the decision of states individually, whether they

should open or close, one of my favorite lines was he said, quote, I inherited him, like he was stuck with Fauci, um, looking back. I wonder if he would ever have fired him knowing what we know now. Um, but he also mentioned that, you know, Fauci, one of the most confusing things that came out of that whole debacle was also to mask or not to mask, you know,

that was the question. And Anthony Fauci seemed to be kind of all over the place on that, um, but, uh, one of the things I also really liked was during 20, 20, I went down to Florida.

“And I think Florida was only closed for like three weeks.”

It felt like 2019, you could go to the grocery store, not see anyone at masks. It was quite amazing.

And I have to say, Governor Ron DeSantis did an amazing job because, if you think about

it, it's the state with the highest elderly population when you count or you count into, um, the totality of the snowbirds that came down there, and, you know, their death rate was on par with other states that were large, like New York, California, these blue states that completely shut down, um, and, and DeSantis had, you know, the highest elderly population I would say at the time, um, and he was smart enough to move voting out of, uh,

nursing homes. That was one of the first states that did that. So, you know, I think President Trump was right when he said he left to the states and the red states seemed to come out a little bit more on top, especially when it came to closing schools and moving quickly to reopen them.

That was obviously a major factor, um, for, uh, what we, what we're left with now, and my my mother was a school teacher for 48 years, and she taught during the whole COVID era and just the, um, damage it did to our young people and their ability to communicate. And even for, for super young, like, your developing students and kids, they're speech delay, um, from, you know, not being able to look at faces, that was dramatic.

Um, also in the news as seems Biden, some of his clips from his interview with his ghost writer have come out, showing his memory lapses, obviously, um, something we'll

“get into during the show as well, um, I know the lawmakers and DOJ I think might be”

looking at what's going on there and his use of the auto pin and how much he could remember how much he could not. Um, so, you know, that's one of the things I, I can't wait to dive into with some of our guests as well. I will be talking to Jonathan Fae, he, I'm excited to have him join the show and just a

little bit. He's former acting eye director, he's going to talk a bit about, if you recall, some of the, I think it's like 250,000 illegals who have been shown up on voter roles in four states. We're going to talk a little bit about what to do there, um, and whether a voter ID would

solve that problem and that'll be, um, probably in about 10 minutes or so is when we're going to hit that, um, topic also, uh, data centers. How do you feel about those, um, coming up, I have a guest who's going to dive into what to make. I mean, AI seems to be the top of the town here in Washington, every event I go to, it feels

like, uh, people are focused on AI, um, a lot of, uh, maybe this is lobbyists, you know, and, and money talks, but a lot of lawmakers are very much pushing it. They say, this is like the birth of the internet, everybody was scared of the internet and

“what it was going to do. And, uh, now you have to embrace AI, it's coming. We have to, we”

have to, you know, beat China in this. And I think there's some good arguments there. I think also there's some claims that what it can do for medicine, medical development, um, educational development, uh, putting together curriculum. Um, but, of course, with

the time with my legal affairs background, um, as the reporter over at the Washington Times

covering the courts. It's, you know, there's some lawyers that rely on AI and they submit briefs that they just completely fabricate and make up cases, and then judges have to sanction them. So, they are not fail proof. Um, it's something also I learned I just recently was emailing. This is kind of funny. I was using my Gmail, and I was emailing somebody, and

“I used the legal term, which was accurate, illegal immigrants, and I think I used illegal”

alien, illegal alien was what it was. And, um, a little squiggly line showed up and wanted me to auto correct it to undocumented immigrant. So, Googles, Gmail's, uh, I guess

it's Google's AI, Gemini, is a little woke, it appears, wanting to change language. So,

illegal alien, they didn't like, they wanted it to be undocumented immigrant, which you know, I kind of frown upon. Especially since illegal alien is actually what's in, our legal text and what you see when you read federal statutes, which seems to be accurate. Are we going to update all of our laws now, too? I don't know how much time would that take. There's so many laws, um, on the books there. But, so yeah, you know, I'm a little skeptical

of AI here and there, but maybe I can be sold on it with our guest later in the hour, um, later in the show. We're also going to hear a bit about, uh, what's going on with, uh, blanch, Todd Blanch, acting attorney general, Todd Blanch's his confirmation vote in the Senate Judiciary Committee is coming up Thursday. It seems like, uh, people are pretty confident he's going to get confirmed. There's two Republican senators on the panel, Senator John Kornin,

Senator, um, Tillis, two out of North Carolina. Both of them have been a little bit of, uh, Trump, um, enemies lately, and it could be possible that they try to go against his appointment of Todd Blanch's nomination. Um, but we will see what happens even if Ian, the vote wasn't positive

“for, for Blanch, he could still be reported to the floor. That's, possibly unlikely. I think it”

looks like they'll have the votes. These two senators, by the way, voted for him when he was up for confirmation for deputy attorney general. So now it seems like they're trying to do an about face. Some of them are complaining about the whole. If you remember the weaponization fund that happened, um, with President Trump and his litigation over the leaking of his IRS tax returns, the settlement that was reached had a weaponization fund where people who were deemed by all this

law fair that we saw play out over the course of the past couple of years could go and collect from the government. Um, some of those would be January six defendants, for example, in a lot of Democrats, especially in some Republicans were very skeptical of that and how it would actually play out. And that was one of the hangups with Todd Blanch's confirmation hearing. They wanted questions,

um, answered about that and how what they would do to make sure that that weaponization fund never

comes into fruition. Um, one of the other aspects we're going to get into, too, is with Gianna called well. He's a Fox News political analyst. He's going to join me later the show, talk a little bit about his brother's murder, his brother was shot in Chicago and he, um,

“has an op-ed over there. I think it's at Fox News.com talking about what he blames. Um, and some”

of that, well, is he goes into the getting ready, get a getting rid of the bail system, these kind of judges that are releasing people as well as sanctuary city policies, which I know is, um, a passionate topic locally. We see a lot of, uh, happenings and fair facts. County with what's going on there in Virginia with some of these sanctuary city, um, and policies in Washington. I's not being able to work with our local police officers and go into jail safely and get those bad guys out of our

country. But stay tuned. We will be right back after the break. Again, I am Alex Swear, editor at Large of the Washington Times in front of my friend Chris Plant, who is on vacation, hopefully bringing shopping for souvenirs and bringing us back something good. Join us for the next episode of D&V's Maritime Impact podcast. This time I speak with D&V's show power expert, Hilda Burstab, about how show power is shifting from a local emission solution to a strategic priority for ship owners.

What are the biggest barriers to adoption and what needs to happen next? To get the answers, search for maritime impact on your favorite podcast platform. Stay tuned. Good morning. This is Alex Swear with the Washington Times editor at Large in for Chris Plant, who's sailing the high seas. Thanks for having me back. Um, I, this is my last day with you guys.

I'm going to welcome in a friend, Brekka Stoll, daily wire reporter. She covered a bit yesterday of New York City Mayor, Mandonis, press conference. He talked a bit about his government or

“on grocery stores. And I was doing a little research, and I think it's expected those stores of”

his, um, are expected to cost 70 million. And the operating costs for just one would be a four

million, um, and would be four million in a city subsidy. So I'm going to bring, uh, Brekka in to tell me a little bit about how that press conference went. And then touch on the news of the day, which it's a busy news day. Hey, Brekka. Hey, Alex, great to be here. So, yeah. So, Ron Mandonis, press conference yesterday. It really shocked, I think, the internet and the news community, because the biggest takeaway is he said that his grocery stores are going to be 30% their price is 30% better than competitors. And as you know, grocery stores run on about one to two percent margins. So that is a big ask. And everyone is saying that the taxpayer is going to be responsible for subsidizing at 30% cost. And we've seen

grocery stores in America before our government run grocery stores, they haven't worked out, they were in Florida and Kansas, um, and they ultimately didn't last because of the cost. Yeah. And you know, of course we've seen them in Venezuela. And we're going to go ahead and over. Well, reports came out of spoiled food, uh, empty shelves, and so now I'm Donnie's trying it again in New York. Well, one of the things I asked you about when you mentioned this was, how is this going to compete with some of our mom and pop shops?

Is there a way are they going to go under because of this 30% lower, allegedly pricing?

You know, Mondani is claiming that he is not going to sell hot food because a lot of New York's bow digas.

“That's what their famous for people running and getting the sandwich getting, um, a bagel in the morning. And so he says he's not going to carry those products.”

And I'll just be a core basket of meat, eggs, seafood, fruit, vegetables, price that, you know, 30% under what Whole Foods, Trader Joe's, uh, grocery stores like that are able to price their products out. Yeah. And then I have a couple, like basically a couple minutes with you left two minutes. I want to touch on the news of the day. President Trump is super busy. He has a meeting with Ukrainian President Zelensky. Also Benjamin Netanyahu around 11 o'clock. Then he's over on Capitol Hill for Senator Graham's funeral, um, in terms of Netanyahu and we just were talking about Mandani.

They've kind of gone back and forth. I think Netanyahu's supposed to visit New York City in a couple months or September, I guess, approaching before I know it. What do you expect any news from Trump and Netanyahu's press? I'm sure they'll take press questions. Is this only going to focus on Iran or do you think we'll get some swipes at Mandani? I mean, he's does seem to be a target of both of President Trump and Netanyahu. You know what I'm doing? Always in a news, but I really think the majority of today's news is going to come out of DC today because, like you said, we have President Zelensky coming in at 930 to meet with President Trump. And what I don't think a lot of people are realizing is Ukraine actually launched an attack on a commercial Iranian vessel in the Cassian Sea last week.

“And so, and that angered Iran. And so I think Trump is going to try and make sure that that doesn't spread and become bigger than it is.”

Zelensky said it was because Russia intelligence was helping Iran. And then also for Benjamin Netanyahu, like will he, will those two leaders talk? Yeah, thanks, Breca. I think that that's something we'll watch for. We'll be right back after the break. Scrolling with Hailey. I'm Hailey Carania. I scroll with the homies here in the live chat because there's a lot to scroll through on X on Instagram on TikTok, cutting through the clutter. One hot take at a time.

Love seeing you all in the chat before the show. I tried to jump in just a few minutes before to say hello. I love the chat interaction. Thank you for helping. But I do it to get all the videos and all the content that you won't find anywhere else. Scrolling with Hailey. Search that up and I will be there. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.

Good morning. This is Alex Sawyer, Washington Times editor at large. In for Chris Plant, who is on vacation still the rest of this week. This is my final day with you guys. Thanks for having me back today. After yesterday, I'll have a new host the next few days, which will be fun. I am joined now by a friend Jonathan Feihin. You, if you watch Fox, you see him quite a bit.

He is a former acting ice official director. He was there during President Trump's first administration.

Actually, during some of our COVID chaos, I thought Jonathan, I might even get your reaction to what seems to be taking over the internet as these Fauci diaries.

You know, it's pretty amazing seeing the diaries. I mean, a lot of it kind of confirms what some of us thought that this guy's ego took over everything.

And that became the most important thing for him was his own, you know, persona out there.

And he never really, you know, even though he always called himself the science and talked about following the science, he never followed the science.

“Because remember back in 2020, it was like, I would say April, I think there are already studies from Europe saying closing schools did not make any difference in in the spread of COVID or people getting sick or harm or anything else.”

Yeah, he still advocated for closing schools. And I think the thing that kind of broke me with him, honestly, was remember during BLM, you know, George Floyd, this is like May of 2020. Right. So everyone who had been told like, hey, we can't go outside, your kids can't play sports, you can't do anything, you can't hang out with your friends. In less all of a sudden, we have the BLM exemption from that that everyone could go out and protest in favor of black lives matter and George Floyd. And it just showed one just like the whole thing was nonsense, but also the hypocrisy.

And then it was all political. And then the secondary part of that, I think it was maybe July or something else. When there was this met, you know, all the stuff at the border and people were being put in, you know, close close quarters and things like that. Yeah. Or no, that was a July, 2021, during Biden. And they were massive numbers of people. And then he was asked about that. At some point, it was like, well, I don't want to get into politics type of thing.

And it's like, wait a second, this whole thing has been politics.

But you always have a dividing line when it might hurt the Democrat agenda because that would have hurt their open borders agenda because the natural thing would have been like, hey, don't let people in that we don't know if they're sick or not.

“And we should stop this. But of course, he didn't do that. So I think those are the types of things that, you know, revealed to me how political he was.”

But the diaries are just like, it's, it's really gross test if you think about it because going back when people were family members are dying, people, you know, we're having severe problems because of these lockdowns losing their businesses, losing their jobs, you know, major mental health issues. And this guy was, you know, posing for magazine covers and all of these things, it was like, yeah. Was he doing like this guy had more free time than any one I knew. And going to dinner over at the tapers house, apparently. So I know we were all told don't go have dinner inside.

You mentioned like social distancing people having barbecues with family outside still sitting like six feet apart like crazy. Um, it's just super unfortunate. I was going to ask you, you kind of touched on it already about how his policies or his narrative had an impact as you were, you know, leading ice at the time when we're acting ice director Jonathan, if you're joining me now real quick.

“Your lawyer, you're an expert in the law. This pardon that I guess it's preemptive and it all, it's pretty blanket, right?”

There's nothing no go around, no work around correct? I think that, yeah, I think where he can step in it is with his testimony tomorrow, which will be under oath. If he lies, you know, contradicts one previous sworn testimony, that's a problem. Or if he contradicts other things that he's, you know, said before or he just blatantly has a new lie, he's not protected there. So I think that puts him in a trick bag because you have these inconsistencies between his public statements and his diaries.

And is he going to go back on prior public statements to say all the diary is right? Is he going to then have to confirm prior public statements because he doesn't want to be charged with perjury? Yeah. So I think he's, he's definitely in a tricky situation. However, the past conduct, I think it would be very hard to work around the pardon. I mean, there are the arguments that could say, well, the pardon was not valid because Joe Biden really didn't know what was going on.

So it wasn't knowingly signed or authorized by Joe Biden. I don't think that's a crazy argument.

I just don't think it could ultimately prevail even though I don't think Joe Biden had a really good sense of what was going on within his administration and certainly at the end of it.

Yeah, I would agree. I think that this whole blanket pardon situation I would love for that to have an issue or a defense to work. It's way through the courts that I get to cover because it's been a while since we've had something like that. It's the work it's way to the justice, especially. But there was to your point, Ram Paul, I think, said that he, they have documents that show Fauci knew back in January of 2020.

So before the shutdowns even happened about the lab leave. So, you know, I don't know if that would be something that he's going to end up, as you mentioned, stepping in during testimonies.

I also wanted to move on. I know you and I were going to talk about some of these hundreds of thousands of non-citizens that were on voter rolls.

“And I think it's like four states, hundreds of the non-citizens voted in New Jersey elections.”

I think it was since 2023. The democratic governor there, though, it says it's Trump's fault, right?

Yeah, it's pretty amazing.

There's like this massive sleight of hand going on. It's sort of like, as the mentalist is, is Mikey Cheryl in New Jersey, or he has nothing on her. Because look at what she's doing. There's a couple, there's a couple full deception going on. One, she's implying when saying this Trump, and that's nonsense.

But the other part of the nonsense is the implication and the mainstream media is running with this is they caught this. They solved it. And it was only a small, unimpactful number. And the ones that they caught were people that said they were not citizens, and therefore not eligible vote. But then we're registered to vote anyway.

It doesn't come close. It doesn't even touch on the bigger category and the unknowable category, and the more sinister category, which is the people that went in there that were illegal, aliens got a driver's license, and falsely said that they were US citizens. And those people got to register to vote.

Those people would have voted if they wanted to. We do not know how many people they are.

And basically what really this all comes down to, particularly with the blue states that don't require vote or ID,

and let illegal aliens get every benefit, and then some is it just shows, you know, one, what's going on here. But we are basically governor. And election integrity nationally is governed by an illegal alien honor code. It's utterly preposterous that somebody could come here from another country illegally. Break our laws, use fake documents to come in or whatever they used to come in.

And get a license and just check that there are citizen and they are for all intention purposes. A US citizen for voting and for everything else. And that's the bigger, that's the bigger scandal, and Mikey Charleston, a brilliant job of making it seem like it's this isolated little computer glitch or whatever they said. But the real issue is we do not check who who gets a license in terms of we let anyone get one. And if they want to vote, all they got to do is check a box.

And that's really something that needs to get looked into. That's one of the things that I found so perplexing.

When the Save America Act was the language was first introduced.

There was a lot of back and forth over this whole like voter ID issue. And I know the argument is and you mentioned that being able to show your ID would help verify whether you're a citizen or not. I think that depends on the state, right? Like isn't that depending on like real ID or what's noted on your driver's license? I know some states do dictate or issue different licenses to people who are non-citizens.

Like how do that seems like I'm all about states rights, but this does seem like a federal issue that there should be some sort of consistency. Yeah, this seems inherently common sense that we should have a uniform system of registering and verifying people that registered a vote are actually a lot to vote. That seems totally common sense. And you're right. It's like, but yeah, voter ID, you know, of itself the only thing it would do, it would probably intimidate people from voting illegally because it might hold it,

make it more likely they could be hold accountable, hold accountable for fraudulent voting. But yeah, if they're determined to do it, it's not enough.

“And that's why the citizenship requirement is so important.”

And also it just shows, you know, all you have to look at to know who's right on this issue, meaning on what is actually going on. I mean, correct, the elegal Democrats want elegal alias to vote is watch the Democrats reactions. When you say something like voter ID, which 80% of the people, 85% of the one, their heads spin around. They go crazy. They call everyone racist. They do all of their normal tricks.

And if they, you know, normally if it wasn't that big a deal, they would call it out. Like, oh, if not citizen voting isn't a big deal, the smart play would be if it was true. You would say, let's get voter ID and citizen chip better verification. And they would call our bluff on it. But they know it's not a bluff.

And that's why they go bananas when you bring it up.

“And it's all these parade of horrible or they used to remember the, you know, that the trophy used to put out like when it was just voter ID.”

Not citizen chip verification, they would bring out some like 90 year old African American that did something in the civil rights march to move into show. Look, she can't get an ID. How horrible this would be.

Yeah. And they spend billions of dollars on that, right, to prevent voter ID as opposed to saying, why don't we just use her resources and get this poor woman a license.

But it was like, all of these things, it was, it was, it's always been in scene.

But you know the Democrats are wrong when all they can come up with is racist, you're mean, you're that, you're, yeah, so it's like, okay, you've lost.

“And why would you ever fight like die on a hill that's an 80, 20% issue against you?”

You can never think of a Democrat issue that's 80% their way that the Republicans usually are going to roll with it. You know, they're, but the Democrats, it's funny that they fight this issue harder than any issue that I can think of. And really, we know why. It is crazy. You know, aliens.

Yeah. Well, so a couple of things when you were talking, I just thought of one. I just have to say, remember, Kamala Harris and her saying, well, people can't find a king goes to.

“I mean, I think that was just kind of crazy. To a commercial trucker licenses seem to be like, it was more than a dozen. I think it's like 17 fatalities have happened because a non-citizens having those commercial trucker licenses.”

So, you know, these blue states are more than willing to issue those, but they don't want anyone to have to show their idea to go vote. We show our idea to get on the plane. It's just, it is one of those head scratching policies that just seem extra, it's like embodies hypocrisy. And blatant politics. But one of the other aspects that I was curious to pick your brain about with your legal background is these DOJ voter roll lawsuits that the Trump administration has launched across the country, trying to clean up state voter rolls.

How successful are these? Like, what's the state of play there? Because I'm sure that's a one way that they can find out, you know, who's illegal and who's not? Who's dead? Who's alive?

“Yeah, the state of play right now. I think they're about 30 of these things filed, and state of play so far is DOJ has not been doing very well on the courts on these.”

The argument is basically the states say, well, you have a right to sort of how our rolls are kept, but not the individual data of voters, you know, social security number things like that.

So that's where this thing is breaking down. It's like a privacy issue. Is that what it is because this is a security number issue, and they're saying they're going outside or beyond what's it's the NBRA national voting right act or something like that. And they are basically saying that's not, it's not allowed under the NBRA. I think a better thing DOJ could be doing, particularly with place like New Jersey, which we already know, it's confirmed that there was illegal aliens voting, we already, we have documents of it.

They should use grand jury subpoena open up our criminal investigation into voter fraud and things like that because you know it's there. And then they could use grand jury subpoena to get more information on voter rolls and things like that. And the states would not have the ability or not the same ability to fight it because they don't have the same ground and the grand jury subpoena gives a government a lot of power and it's perfectly legitimate to say, hey, we know that there've been at least 6,600 nonsense and registered to vote in your state. That's a crime, particularly for once it's voted.

And we want to look into it to see if this is a larger conspiracy, you know, organized by the state or by the democratic party, which seems to be the case, because we know, again, the democratic party. Once illegal aliens to vote, at least to my judgment, and it seems like illegal aliens get so much more representation in the democratic party, it totally makes sense.

But I think, you know, the MBR A thing, it may ultimately unfold the OJ's way as we go out of the corner.

Yeah, that's what I was curious about. Going to the Supreme Court, for example. Yeah, could cut their way, but you know how that is, which is a world in which, okay, we're already going to be through November election. Of this year, so it won't help the Republicans this year, so the best hope would be the 2028 election, which is still quite important. It's just a long road, because look at the, that TPS issue that was temporary protective status issue that was just decided by the Supreme Court last month.

That took like, you know, it took years sort of making us wait through the court, almost eight up half of the Trump administration just to get there. So that's the challenge with a lot of things for President Trump. Is even when he ultimately wins the Democrats achieved sort of a gain because they're able to gum things up in the courts. Yeah, that's true. And I do think this court has been differential to the Trump administration more or less.

Like he had some losses this term, but like the Lisa Cook one was kind of sending it down to lower courts, like she needs more notice. Obviously the birthright citizenship one, I'm sure, you know, I could probably spend 10 to 15 minutes just talking about that and what's what the state of play is there.

I've been tracking some of these voter role lawsuits.

I think it's a good effort.

“So, you know, we'll see if the Trump administration is listening in and it takes some of your strategic advice on how to feel about this.”

Thank you so much, Jonathan Feige. For more acting, I historically appreciate your time and expertise. I'll explore editor at large of the Washington Times in for Chris Plant who is on vacation. Stay with us. We'll be right back.

Good morning. I'll explore Washington Times editor at large in for Chris Plant who is on vacation, but I am pleased to join you all. And have a fun show.

Thanks for having me back from yesterday.

Lots of talk about I feel like Anthony Fauci's like my number one topic yesterday. We were looking ahead at his testimony tomorrow.

“That will be on Capitol Hill in front of some senators.”

His diary entries have just taken over the internet. He did not shy away from the cameras. One of the biggest problems I saw for him twofold. One is that he's privately talking about how he was able to. It was his comments that convinced the New York City mayor as well as Gavin Newsom.

Someone in Gavin Newsom's office to talk about closing schools.

That was they did so in reaction to what he was saying.

That was their plan. And then also his an entry that we're he and went over to have dinner with Jake Tapper and his wife. You know, a lot of us were being told not to go indoors and have dinner. That we need to stop the spread yet he was whining and dining. Some of these liberal media elites and curing favor with them.

Talking about how he was being counseled about back and forth on interviews and ways to answer questions. Who to talk to? Just kind of a player behind the scenes. He thought very highly of himself. Just a very weird situation there playing out.

And also I am extremely interested in Biden. His audio clips that have come out of him talking to his ghost writer. And in some of those clips you hear him have memory issues which we all know was a situation. Was happening and we saw it play out in real time. Democrat party tried to hide that as best they could.

And we also have some clips of him admitting about this could be classified.

“Sort of thing, which is pretty huge. Remember, I think it was president Trump.”

That jacksmith went after not so long ago for classified information. And I know just a little fun tidbit as a lawyer. Some of those charges, jacksmith, lobbed against president Trump. Over those class of a material down at Mara Logo. Those stat, that's actual limitations eight years.

So mind you, if we have a Democrat DOJ in 2028, they could try to revive some of those. So, you know, we'll see what happens here. Stay tuned. I'll be right back after the break. Scrolling with Hayley. I'm Hayley, Karenia. I scrolled with the homies here in the live chat.

Because there was a lot to scroll through on X on Instagram on TikTok or cutting through the clutter. One hot take at a time. Love seeing you all in the chat before the show. I tried to jump in just a few minutes before to say hello. I love the chat interaction.

Thank you for helping. But I do it to get all the videos and all the content that you won't find anywhere else. Scrolling with Hayley. Dissearch that up and I will be there. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.