I Kornig vibes to the best place.
Wow, Gid with you for a year in the third city.
A couple of years after the high school.
“I don't know if that's what I wanted to live.”
Stream up to the 13th April, parallel to U.S. I really want a new episode. The problem is. And you're a part of the title track. Give it a try more.
I'm excited to see how "House of the Dragon" and "Wicked". All of them are just 80 and 90 in the world. Streaming, but not so, wow. Café in its best form. With Cuba, every café on Knotftrook is at its right moment.
With the new Cuba-Wan Capsule Machine from Chibu, I welcome you to the most special café in the world. Full-Mondic Arômen, thanks to Innovative Press Brutechnology and the 7-Sortem Café for every match. Aléba Premium Café is already in the 19th century.
“And here's the Cuba-Capsule Machine in their Chibufiale and Chibu D.E.”
[Music] This is the Daily Blast from the New Republic, produced and presented by the DSR network. I'm your host, Greg Sargent. [Music]
It's now becoming clear that Donald Trump's failed war in Iran will have far-reaching consequences for our country and geopolitically as well. We're only just beginning to get our heads around how disastrous this war and this presidency could very well prove over time. It's a deeply consequential moment and Trump is spending his nights
tweeting crazed demands for adulation, insisting that his war was a world-historical triumph and seeping about the prospects for finishing his ballroom. This gap between what Trump is doing to this country and the world on one side and his megalomaniacal trivial obsessions on the other
“is really jarring and unnerving to witness.”
Paul Cragman has been writing really well on his excellent sub-stack about both sides of this divide, so we're talking to him about how to make sense of it all. Paul, nice to have you back on. Good to be back on, although I wish the times were better, but anyway, yeah. Exactly, so let's start with the easy stuff at 4.32 in the morning,
Donald Trump posted this quote. "These fools who think I haven't been tough enough on Iran when the stock market just hit a record high and oil prices are tumbling down, are either jealous, bad people or stupid. Make America great again."
Paul Trump is very angry that he's not getting more worshipable praise for the world historical triumph that was his ceasefire with Iran,
which basically just put a stop to the disaster he created.
So we might as well start here. What did you think of the quote unquote "deal"? Obviously, it's horrible. The Iran one, it's a, the Iran is in a much stronger position and the US in a much weaker position than before the war started.
And of course, the deal is vastly inferior to the Obama, VACPOA that Trump ripped up in his first term. All of this at the cost of enormous outlays of money, depletion of weapons stocks, killed a lot of people. And basically, we've just shown the whole world that we're maybe not quite a paper tiger,
but a lot less of a power than we were supposed to be. So all of this is an enormous divinution of the United States. But I don't think there are hawks are saying, why is Trump giving in? Why isn't he following up on his victory?
But there was no victory. This is actually the best you could do given how the war is gone. In fact, it should have made this deal about a weekend when it became clear that the whole premise of his enterprise was not going to work. He could have made a better deal before the war started.
Of course, he could have just done nothing. I mean, that would have been better. And he could have going back in time. He could have kept that Obama agreement, which was doing a much better job of containing Iran.
So yeah, but it tells you something about where we are, that there are apparently a substantial number of, yeah, at least until recently pro Trump people, who really believed that we were winning the war or we had won the war. Which just shows you how detached from reality they are.
Well, they're all on the same information bubble. Trump did another omissive that was in all caps saying this quote. Oil is flowing.
Iran can never have a nuclear weapon.
The world will be safe.
The stock markets are roaring. The jobs are at records and prices are dropping. Affordability. Our country is strong, safe,
and respected like never before.
You're welcome. Okay, Paul. He got nothing significant on Iran's nukes. And our country is weaker, less safe and less respected. But I think we should step back.
He's making a bigger argument there, isn't he? It's that in every way the nation is booming, strong, and leading decisively in the world. What do you make with that bigger argument? Okay, so, I mean, the stock market is up.
No question about that. Although the stock market rose a lot under Joe Biden too. People, you know, Trump would like you to put that down the memory hole. And stocks are up by the way around the world. There's a stock market boom.
I haven't checked the numbers lately,
“but I believe that they're up substantially more.”
Outside the United States than the United States. So this is, you know, this is stuff that is not really reflecting. Reflecting U.S. specific developments and certainly not Trump specific developments. You know, President has do not control the stock market. But the, and so, you know, leaving that aside,
well, the economy, it's not booming. We are basically have had slower job growth than we did in, you know, in the Biden, in the last two years of Biden. And basically flat unemployment. So that's not great.
It's not the catastrophe. It's not great. Real wages are lower than they were when Trump took office, because we've had a lot of inflation. By the way, one of the things with this corruption of how we do stuff.
Click on any pretty much any information site. I've been only looking at the ones to have to do with economic policy, but you know, if federal government information sites, which are traditionally there, it's just sort of just the facts.
Here's, here's what's happening.
Maybe discreetly touting administration policies, but you click on any site and you got pop up. That has a picture of Trump and says welcome to the golden age, which is all part of this incredible, the kind of ding-back cult of personality.
He corrupts everything. It just seeps into every last corner of public life, basically.
“I think it's worth pointing out that this incredible personalized”
cult of personality for Trump. Well, it's absolutely ludicrous level now. This actually started ways back. It was a fair bit of it under Reagan, and that's not forget George Bush on the flight suit, right?
So this kind of the president is a, as a comic book hero thing is something that appears to go along with modern Republican governance. But of course it's reached an level of absurdity with Trump, both because of the extremeness of the, of the cult of personality
and because the reality is that he's,
there has to be a better, he's a fuck up, or basically nothing, everything Trump touches turns to grud. And so it's really insane. Yeah, there are like a lot of dimensions to it. Look at some of those late night tweets,
the tweets we're talking about here. You kind of get hit by a real dose of somebody in very steep mental decline, I think. It's sort of too layered, right? On the one hand, it's the sheer nakedness of the demand
for adulation, which is just completely crazy. Somebody who's sunsetting very plainly in plain sight, who knows he's on his way out, and is desperate to sort of have something
“that he can call legacy, that's what we see there.”
But at the same time, you also see him completely detached from the reality of what he's actually done to us. What he's done to you and me, to liberal America, to blue America, even to red America, even to maga country. And so, yeah, somebody's especially to maga country,
but yeah, right, two dimensions here of someone in steep mental decline, don't you think? Yeah, I mean, this is, you know, I'm not a psychologist, but I do, as my understanding is that when you're sundowning, when you're in this dissociation
that does, I'm on another thing, tend to come with age, that you, in some ways become more like yourself. Those, those aspects of your personality that were disagreeable and unpleasant and dysfunctional, but which you were able to, these police,
when you were still more there, now just come out. It's a little bit like, you know, it's something like, like getting drunk or anything. But anyway, there's a lack of complete lack of a filter now,
Even the, I mean, presumably Trump always
was a person who lived just for external ideation. I mean, it must be awful to be him.
“There's, I think there's no inside at all.”
But 10 years ago, he was canny enough to keep it at least somewhat under wraps. And now he's just out of control. It, it all gets blurred it out at four in the morning. Indeed, you had this video where you went very
big picture kind of assessing where we really are right now. I want to try to summarize your argument briefly.
Basically, it's that the United States is no longer seen by our allies
and much of the world as an indispensable nation. Our military can't do what we thought it could. Can't force smaller countries like Iran to do our bidding or Trump's bidding. That due to Trump's tariff fiascos, we have less leverage and trade wars than we thought.
The China has unexpected leverage over supply chains and important goods and important resources that impart due to our abandonment of Ukraine, our one-time allies are looking past us to a post-American world, et cetera, et cetera. Is that the basic argument?
Yeah, it's a basic argument with the, it is worth saying that even things that I find somewhat encouraging, like the fact that Ukraine is holding despite Trump having cut them all completely. You know, I say, it's just stopped sending money
and basically stopped the flow of arms.
We won't even allow the Europeans to buy arms for Ukraine. And yet, Ukraine seems to be gaining the upper hand, which is telling you that they don't need us. The world doesn't need us. And that's part of what's happened in Iran as well.
It turns out that if there was one thing we thought that America really had was, well, we had the world's greatest military, and we had the world's best weapons and nobody else could manage without us. And we'll turn it out that we were completely flatfooted in the face of Iranian drones
and that Ukraine is holding its own without American weapons. And so, who are we? We're becoming bystanders, bystanders, or becoming bystanders in world events. America is a rogue power.
It does crazy things. It can't even impose its will on a third rate military power like Iran. And we don't seem to actually be necessary for the defense of Europe.
So we're kind of a shadow of our former selves on the world stage. Is this inexorable decline, do you think? Can it be turned around? Some of it is probably irreversible, and some of it would have happened anyway.
The truth is, to a large extent,
the America as it seemed to be, as Trump took office was an automotive vision. And I think we didn't fully understand that. But there was still a reflexive tendency on much of the world to think that,
well, you have to accommodate. You have to give in, allow yourself to be bullied by an American president no matter what. And that was all,
“the truth is the fundamentals had already shifted”
against United States and the sort of global power game. But then, there's a lot that, it's obviously been made much worse by Trump's screw-ups. And what the world now has to suspect, even when Trump is gone from this stage,
is, well, who's the next guy, and how do we know that we won't have another Trump-like figure? Doesn't agree with America mean anything, since we've just seen American president rip-up
every agreement that we had. That does a threat from America mean anything, because we've just seen that same guy cave totally. And after all this guy was elected, sorry to say it was elected fairly by the American people.
So what does that say about America? And we don't get that back. It took generations to build the reputation of America. And you don't get that back. You know, unless you give us three generations
of good governance from here on in.
“To stay up to date on all the news that you need to know,”
there's no better place than right here on the DSR network. And there's no better way to enjoy the DSR network than by becoming a member. Members enjoying ad-free listening experience, access to our discord community,
exclusive content, early episode access, and more. Use code DSR 26 for a 25% off discount on sign-up at the DSR network and dot com.
That's code DSR 26 at the DSR network and dot com slash by.
Thank you and enjoy the show. If you're interested in all of this, you'll get to know. If you're interested in the podcast, you'll get to know.
If you're interested in the podcast, you'll get to know. If you're interested in the podcast, you'll get to know. If you're interested in the podcast,
you'll get to know. If you're interested in the podcast, you'll get to know. If you're interested in the podcast, you'll get to know.
If you're interested in the podcast, you'll get to know. If you're interested in the podcast, you'll get to know. If you're interested in the podcast,
you'll get to know. If you're interested in the podcast, you'll get to know. If you're interested in the podcast, if you're interested in the podcast,
you'll get to know. If you're interested in the podcast, you'll get to know. If you're interested in the podcast, you'll get to know.
If you're interested in the podcast, you'll get to know. If you're interested in the podcast, you'll get to know. If you're interested in the podcast,
you'll get to know. If you're interested in the podcast, you'll get to know. If you're interested in the podcast, you'll get to know.
If you're interested in the podcast, you'll get to know. If you're interested in the podcast, you'll get to know. If you're interested in the podcast,
you'll get to know. If you're interested in the podcast, you'll get to know. If you're interested in the podcast,
“we have learned that being dependent on oil is a problem, right?”
The lesson here is that making this transition is even more imperative. At the same time, we're lagging behind by choice. How bad is this self-inflicted wound?
And what can what can be done about it? Well, yeah. I mean, that's a really, you know, on Wednesday, the interior department announced
it was paying another $765 million to an energy company,
not to build wind farms, right? We're actually not only refusing to follow pro-green energy policies, but actually spending taxpayer money to block it. The appendagon is,
is using spurious national security concerns to block development of wind farms. So this is a aggressively anti-renewable energy administration. And you know, that's,
we can talk, I will be talking shortly in the substack about the motivations, but the, you know,
at a fundamental level, again, this is one of these things
“where US influence was kind of faded to decline.”
In the US does have oil and gas in a way that other advanced countries do not. And so that gave us something of a special position,
but with the incredible progress
and renewable energy, that matters a lot less than it used to. But then on top of that, you have both the US is, we are basically alone.
Everyone else is marching towards the energy transition, then we're trying to go back to coal. And, to the extent that countries might have wanted to, well, rely on us a bit.
It's actually even more than oil. It's, it's lukified natural gas. And there was a possible future we seemed to be heading for in which,
at least to a certain extent, the world would be relying on US LNG to, as a, at least a transitional source of power on the way to the green revolution.
But instead, if you were dependent on the United States for LNG, wouldn't you worry that Trump might get mad at you, because you won't hand over greenlander, something like that and cut it off.
And, and are you sure that America won't, again, be led by somebody like that? So, the US is a, as on top of everything else,
we're risky. We're not, we're not trustworthy, so nobody's going to rely on us for energy.
“Well, Trump's focused on the important things.”
Here at 251 AM, he went on a rampage about his ballroom. He insisted it's coming along brilliantly, and effectively demanded more agitation for how great it's going to be.
You know, it's going to be outfitted with all this powerful military security, etc.
Then he raged about the legal tribals. He's still facing over this. Even though he tore down the White House, the East Wing unilaterally, and probably illegally.
In another tweet, he celebrated the gilding of some statues. In the third, he posted a picture of himself on the cover of a magazine in India. As if we're, we're supposed to marvel at that
in some way. Look, Trump is the cover guy. I'm in magazine in India. What's striking to me here, and you wrote about this, is just this kind of relentless desecration and degradation of everything.
He's desecrating the ways in which our capital, supposed to embody small, our republicanism. He's turning it into a cross-imperial court, basically.
Yeah, I mean, your Washington D.C. was designed very much with
Classical models in my mind.
They found him fathers were very much
into ancient Roman history,
“but they were into the history of the Roman”
republic, not the empire. They wanted it. And all of the, yeah, we have all of this grand monumental architecture in in D.C., but it's all
celebrating the people, the republic. It's not personal glory. And certainly, you would never
exalt a currently living president that way. So, you know, I actually, I live in New York, not too far from their, there's a long,
riverside drive along the West and side up Manhattan. There's a series of monuments. There's grants to them. There's the soldiers and sailors
monument and so on. And they're all very impressive. They're kind of like Washington D.C. in a way, but notably, there's no personal clarification.
Even grants too. It's not a monumental statue grant. It's a celebration of defensive of the republic. The soldiers of sailors monument
has the names of generals, but they're in plain type and their and battles, which include the defeats as well as the victories.
Because this is, this is the republic. We are stoic. We are modest. And now we have
Trump yielding everything, wanting to erect a gigantic arch of triumph in the, in the capital. And, and filling the reflecting pool
with algae, which is just
“showing that the gods have a sense of humor.”
Yeah, that is perfect. The drain the swamp guy is filling the reflecting pool with algae. I just want to try to pull this all together. What we're talking about this moment is that
Trump and J.D. vans don't feel like a shred of obligation to speak to the country with even minimal tender at all about what just happened, right?
Everything is all about false glorification of Trump.
And it's always just about using
the most cynical eyes they can to insulate him from any accountability for this calamity. It's always all about him, no matter what. There's no sense of obligation
as real leaders or statesman who care about the nation and its future and have a conception of what's in the interests of the American people.
How do you put all this together in your mind? Well, it's about them, but I think the real question is what has happened to us, or at least to the
“Republican Party, but I think it may be even”
broader than that, that this can happen. What is, you know, where, I remember there was a time when people used to mark a rubio as a sort of reformist Republican, that reformer common, whatever.
And now, here he is walking around and oversized shoes because Trump bought them for me. He's afraid to take them off and look and acting as a mixed-biddle for all of this crazy
ego demonstration. My God, I think there's this whole, there will probably be many future books written about the downward spiral that
everyone who deals with Trump seems to go into.
But we always knew that there were people
like Trump, but the idea that the world's, basically, the world's oldest Republic, I think, you know, that the nation that invented Republican values and democratic norms
puts up with it. That's what really shocks me. Well, let me just close out this way. It's my feeling a little bit that Democrats, while they're functioning
more as an opposition than maybe they were at the outset of Trump's second term when they were clearly snake bitten just terrified and on some level, Democrats had widely
concluded that Trump had put his finger on some sort of real popular sentiment that everybody missed. I think that was never true. He won by a point in a half and
he was at a time of inflation and post-COVID shock and so forth. But that's where Democrats were. Now they're functioning more as an opposition. But still, I feel like there's
a smallness to their politics, Paul. And you've been writing about the big problems here and sort of the desecration plus the decline,
those two sides that I talked about should Democrats be making a bigger argument? What might something like that look like? Some kind of situation, which essentially says,
you know, let's be real about what this guy is doing to us. Like an argument that says, let's face reality about what this man has movement
have done to our country and really setting forth a new direction. Is there some way to do that for
Democrats?
the, I think the corruption
is the theme and corruption of various kinds, but I think that all ties together. And if we, let's talk about kitchen table issues, you can make that part of it.
The reason that you can't afford your electricity is because of the corruption. The reason that you can't, that you can't afford health insurance is because of the corruption.
And look, I mean, why the happiest things, politically is happened in the world, was the overturn of the Arban regime in Hungary,
which was, you know, very much something that market people viewed as a role model. This is how you've converted democracy. And it turns out that, yeah,
but with enough people mad enough,
you can, you know, flood across the, all of the barriers they've created. And the central theme of the Muggar campaign was corruption.
These guys are corrupt. There were, you know, there were zebra's on the, the, the family, orban family estate in the countryside apparently.
And the zebra's, the stuff zebra's became an image of the, for the opposition, because they was all about corruption. That seems to me like,
you know, people may not think in terms of abstract. They certainly won't think in terms of Republican norms, but to make it just,
well, I can shave 15% off the, off the price of gasoline, if you elect me. That is not how to stop
this horrifying term to say, this is a, this is, these people are utterly corrupt, self-centered,
and you are paying the price. That sounds like a movement that can work. Yes. And I like the idea of using corruption to sort of open the door
to an argument about moral corruption and degradation, which I think,
“I think people sense that that's happening.”
You know, the reflecting pool and the algae and the tearing down of the White House East Wing, and the replacement of it with a ballroom, and the arch,
those are things that really resonate for people. And I think it's because of what we're talking about here, right? There was a point at which Democrats said something like,
oh, the ballroom's a distraction, right? But it's clear that these things have profound resonance for people
for these reasons, that there's a sense that, that our common life or something like that is just being fundamentally degraded at a very profound level.
And I think the corruption argument opens the door there. I'd point out, by the way, just to close out, that the Magiar campaign was also about what this man, Orban,
and his movement, orbanism, did to us. What he did to us. And that seems like there's a,
you know, you've been writing about what Donald Trump is doing to us. And it seems like some Democrats need to step up and grab that mantle
in some way, I guess. Yeah.
“And I think fire is one of the consultants,”
but no, I mean, you know, and I would say, you know, I'm a numbers guy.
I like to live, you know, I'm a lot of ways. I view the world through spreadsheets, but it's not about the numbers.
300,
if there's 300 million of taxpayer funds
going to the bowl room, whatever, in the scale of federal budget, that's not big, but it's a symbol of
this horrible thing that's happening. And I think it's, and it's something people can relate to. Paul, Crogman,
thank you so much for writing your sub-stack. I learned from it all the time. Really, I'm not exaggerating. I didn't learn from it every day,
and Paul, thanks for coming on with us. Well, thank you.


