This is the Daily Blast from the New Republic, produced and presented by the ...
I'm your host, Greg Sargent.
“In an interview with a MAGA Media Personality, Donald Trump let's slip that he's considering”
declaring a national emergency to take over the midterms. This is partly bluster, but we should take it seriously. It comes as Republicans privately fear or Trump's rage is boiling over their failure to pass voter suppression legislation. He's clearly looking for new ways to steal the election this fall.
So what can Trump actually do if he does try to go full dictator and seize control of the midterms? How far can he get? What impact might it have even if he fails? What can we do to prepare?
We're talking about all of it with election law expert Rick Hasson, who's one of the best
out there at explaining this stuff. Rick, good to have you on. It's great to be with you. So just to set the table here, the Senate wanted to recess without passing Trump's impact, which could disenfranchise millions if it did pass, political reports that
Republicans are now bracing for Trump's quote unquote wrath. They expect Trump to explode again with more demands for the save act and they fear that will turn off MAGA base voters they need to turn out in the midterms. Rick, what do you make of all that? Well, yeah, it's been really one of the president's priorities for months.
He's obsessed with election fraud.
Whether he believes it or not, he talks about it constantly and what the save America act
as it's now called in its most recent iteration would do among other things is require everybody to potentially re-registered a vote, providing original copies of their birth certificates. Maybe their marriage license is their naturalization certificates. It would be a hugely disenfranchising law if it passed, but it's stuck.
There are not even 50 Republicans who support it, so there are Republicans like Lisa Murkowski and Mitch McConnell, both of whom have reasons to oppose it. So forget about blowing up the filibuster, which is what Trump wants the Senate to do. There's just not even enough support on the Republican side to get this thing passed with a majority vote.
Right, this thing isn't happening and that's the context for this. Trump was talking to Wayne Allen Root, a MAGA personality, Root suggests that Trump declare a national emergency to take over our elections. Then Root says the Supreme Court has precluded Congress from overriding such declarations and listened closely to the end, where Trump says stranger things have happened, I'll
leave it at that. Check this out. You have the right to declare a national security emergency for elections and the Supreme Court ruled in 1983, under Reagan, that I and S. Versace Chata, that if you declare a national security emergency as the President of the United States, they can't challenge
it. It can only be overturned by a two-thirds vote of both houses of Congress. So if you do this in the next month, we will get photo ID, proof of citizenship, and limit to mail-in ballots, and we'll leave it at the end. All right, we'll leave it at that.
So you heard that, right? Trump says clearly, stranger things have happened, I'll leave it at that, Rick. So let's just break this up into pieces before we get into the details about what this would entail.
“Trump is letting it dangle out there that he's really considering this, right?”
Oh, yeah. I mean, he's just constantly saying things. You may remember, months ago, he talked about nationalizing the elections and taking over elections in 15 states. But he's constantly making claims that maybe he's going to do something related to the
midterms and his new attorney general, Todd Blanche, won't preclude the idea of sending ice agents to the polls. Now, I don't think that's going to happen, but they're dangling all kinds of stuff out. Right. And he is clearly letting it be known that he's considering declaring a national emergency
over our elections, yes? He is, it might be for internal mega consumption too, but he certainly not excluding that possibility. Right. So let's go through this.
When presidents declare national emergencies in unlocks powers that Congress has already created in other statutes, which presidents can then wield by virtue of having declared
“the emergency, in general terms, Rick, what sort of powers do these tend to be?”
So Trump has declared a national emergency at the border.
He did it in his first term and he did it now and that might free up some mon...
allow him to take congressional appropriations that were otherwise going to be used for some purposes and use them for other purposes.
“So there are, I think it was account by just security, the great website, 50 different powers”
that could be invoked. None of them have anything to do with elections, but there is definitely presidents can and do invoke the term national emergency and it does give them additional powers to do certain things. And Congress has given that power and it's true that Congress couldn't take the way
away that power unless the president agreed, or unless two thirds of both houses of Congress pass some legislation to do that. Well, the rub here is that declaring a national emergency wouldn't unlock any presidential powers over elections specifically, right? Even though it would unlock a bunch of other powers, just nothing over elections specifically.
Can you walk us through that piece of this? Why doesn't it do that? So there are two reasons why declaring a national emergency doesn't make Donald Trump the elections are in this country.
The first is there's no federal statute of all of those 50 statutes that deal with national
emergencies, none prescribe any powers to the president over elections. The other reason is even more fundamental. The Constitution, the United States Constitution, does not give the president power over elections. We have a decentralized election system.
Most of our election rules come from states, from state legislatures passing statutes. There's a part of the Constitution, it's an article one section for, it says that Congress can override state rules on elections. That's when Congress, for example, requires motor voter. People can register to vote at motor vehicles, apartments.
But Congress has to do that with legislation. The president has no rules, but all that the president can do is take care to assure that the laws that Congress passes are being faithfully executed. Exactly. Before we get to the bigger picture here, Wayne Allen Root made this claim about the supreme
court ruling that Congress can't override declarations of national emergencies.
“Can you explain just briefly what he thought he was saying there?”
So the bottom line here is that Root thinks that if Trump declares the national emergency
and tries to take over elections, the Congress can't stop him because they need both houses of Congress on a two-thirds vote to stop him. The problem with that logic is simply that declaring national emergency never gave Trump the power to have over elections in the first place. So there's nothing for Congress to overrule.
Yes, that is exactly what he thought he was saying and he really laid bear. I think how preposterous it is. The crux of this, though, is that we shouldn't shrug about it. You wrote on your election law blog, which is excellent, everyone should check it out, that Trump has other motives for letting it dangle out there that he might declare
our national emergency even if the idea is bogus. What are those other motives? Can you walk us through that? Yes, sure.
“One thing that I think he's trying to do is to please his maga base.”
They've been pushing for a long time to have Trump declared this national emergency. In fact, there was some group that sent him a draft executive order that was going to do just that and totally take over elections.
That document was leaked to the Washington Post, Trump never did anything about it.
So he's trying to please the maga base, keep them thinking that he's going to do something. Second thing is that if the Democrats actually win control of both houses or even one house of Congress in November, they're going to make Trump's last two years very unpleasant. And so he is trying to delegitimize in advance those Democratic victories. I tried, I told you we should have fixed the elections, Democrats cheated what they're doing
is illegitimate. So to try to, you know, pre-pre-bunk that. And the last thing I think that it does is he's trying to scare people, he's trying to scare people and thinking he has more power than he has that itself makes him powerful because people are deterred by him.
And maybe it deters people from showing up to vote elections, hey, are there going to be ice agents at the polling place, is my ballot not going to count why bother voting? And I think that's extremely dangerous. So these are all things I agree we should not be complacent at all, even if Trump doesn't have the power to actually do some of the stuff he's threatening.
If you're enjoying this episode and want to get even more out of the DSR network, you need to check out our sub-stack. The DSR network sub-stack is the absolute best way to follow deep state radio. The DSR daily, where it's matter, need to know, silica consciousness, AI, energy and climate, and the daily blast.
Sign up to get notified every time a new episode drops and stay up to date on...
news and expert analysis.
Right now, we're offering 20% off of a DSR network membership. Payed members get an ad free listening experience, select episodes two days early, 50% off of David's need to know sub-stack and more. To get your 20% off, go to DSR network.substack.com/august26. That's DSR network.substack.com/august26.
“Yeah, and I think that you very neatly get at what the role of ISIS in all this.”
ISIS is very terrifying for good reason to a lot of people in the United States of America now. So whenever Trump says, "Oh, you know, maybe ISIS will be at the polling places, then they're hoping that people will just not want to run into masked, heavily armed thugs in the process of exercising their right to vote."
And I think that's really what this is about, is to frighten us all into believing that
we don't have an electoral system anymore, that they've won, basically.
What do you think of that? Yeah, I think Trump has managed to do a double whammy. On the one hand, he's convincing his supporters that the elections are rigged and that they can't be trusted. And then when Republicans try and take actions to secure the election system, like trying
to pass the save act, well, then Democrats think, "Oh, he's trying to rig the elections." And so everybody's confidence election goes down.
“And it's like, "Why may I back by ballot if the post office isn't going to deliver it?”
Why show up at the polling place if there's going to be armed security there?" Like all of these things are, I think, scare tactics. And we shouldn't give Trump the power.
We shouldn't give Trump room in our heads to panic over whether or not we're gonna have
free and fair election. I think there's another element to this, so I want to get out as well. There's a tendency of the press and a lot of liberals to look at this kind of thing and say, "Oh, it's bluster, it's Trump using his magical distraction powers, et cetera, et cetera." But I think it should be hugely controversial that he would even say he's considering
these things, because he's revealing a very profound contempt for our democracy and really a profound contempt for you and me, Rick, as voters, contempt for millions and millions of voters across the country. And I think we should say loudly how violent it is for him to do that. What do you think?
“Well, you may remember that back in 2016 and in 2020, he said he wouldn't accept the”
results of the election unless he won. I mean, this is just, this is banana republic stuff, it's terrible stuff. And I should say there are things that Donald Trump might try to do to try to manipulate the election outcomes that I'm very worried about, not ice agents at the polls, but try to interfere with the certification of election results or the tabulation of ballots.
Trump's got a lot of levers. These are not legal levers, bothly, there are things that would be illegal. But one of the things I'm really worried about is, what if he tries to have his department just to seize ballots in a live election? That would be terrible.
So we have to be on guard, this is not a moment of complacency, even if it's true that the courts would say Trump has no power to nationalize our election. And just to go back to your earlier point about sewing doubts in the elections and sewing doubts in the legitimacy of elections, that has the ability to function later as a pretext for him doing those things that he could do, such as seize ballot boxes, right?
Absolutely. And so I think, and every opportunity, we have to point out that Trump doesn't have this power and point out how illegitimate it is for him to try to exercise it. One of the levers that Trump is trying to use right now is he's trying to order the United States postal service not to deliver mail and ballots from states that don't comply with the
set of rules that he's ordered the postal service to put out. He's also ordered the home security to come up with lists of citizens that states are going to have to compare or to their own list or face criminal liability potentially. Whether he's going to be able to do any of this is currently before the United States Supreme Court in an emergency motion or Trump is trying to be able to do this before the elections.
Now, I don't think he's going to be able to succeed in part because it's too late. Our election administrators are already getting right to run our elections, but it shows you he's using every tool, whether that's executive orders, whether that is his bully pulpit, whether that is his, you know, various departments of his government that are trying to get voting roles, all of this is of a piece that is really trying to exert whatever power he can over how
elections are run despite the fact that the Constitution gives him no power in this area. So Rick, what can we do right now to prepare? What would you suggest to rank and file voters out there who are very worried about what's about to happen, but really adamantly want to do their part to whatever degree they can right now
To prevent this madman from pulling off anything like that?
Well, I mean, one thing to do is to make sure you're registered to vote and to actually vote.
And, you know, you know, checking your registration with all of these Trump pressures on voter registration, I'm worried about state dropping people from the voter girls who are eligible to vote.
So make sure you can vote. That's like the number one thing.
“But also, I think, you know, support those organizations that are fighting Trump on issues like”
whether he has any power over elections has been a lot of litigation already and it's going to
continue probably through the election. And, you know, because our elections are so decentralized,
there's lots of opportunity for people to get involved as either poll workers or as observers, either for a party or, you know, with good government groups, there's election protection work to do. There's a lot of things to do and if Trump actually tries to do something to interfere with elections, that's the time that the public is going to need to be ready to go to the streets if they need to.
“I really don't think that's going to be necessary because I think there's going to be enough”
pushback before that. But our democracy's not going to protect itself. It does appear as if civil society is fully engaged here. And I've got to say, I see democratic resilience and all that. Folks, if you want more of Rick Hassan, make sure to check out his blog, election law,
“blog, it's chock full of stuff like this. Rick, always good to talk to you. Thanks so much for”
coming on. Thanks for the opportunity. You've been listening to the daily blast with me, your host Greg Sargent. The Daily Blast is a new Republican podcast and is produced by Riley Fessler on the DSR network.
