Hey, it's the creator of the Epstein files.
Before we get into today's episode,
“I need to tell you about my brand new podcast, "War Desk".”
If you value how we fact-check the narrative and follow the raw data on this show, "War Desk" is built for you. It's a massive ongoing investigation into the rapidly escalating developments
happening in the Middle East right now. It is completely postpartisan and follows the facts. Instead of cable news talking points, we go straight to the source to explain the reality of global conflict.
Search for "War Desk" on Apple podcasts or Spotify right now, or check this episode's description for the links and hit follow. All right, let's get into the episode. (upbeat music)
Three million pages of evidence,
thousands of unsealed flight logs, millions of data points, names, themes, and timelines connected. You are listening to the Epstein files. The world's first AI native investigation
into the case that traditional journalism simply could not handle. - Welcome to the Epstein files. - Last time we investigated Jeff Tube, the citizen-built platform that indexed
every released Epstein document and hit 1.3 million views while the DRJ stayed silent.
“- Today, we are looking at what the public”
is actually searching for. A 1,200% spike in Google queries after the document releases. And the questions driving that surge are not what you would expect.
As part of our ongoing investigation.
- As always, every document and source we reference
is available at EpsteinFiles.fm. - So let us start with the document. The Google Trends data showing Epstein searches outpacing every other major news story during the document release window,
because the shape of that spike tells us exactly what the public believes is still being hidden. - That 1200% spike in search volume, it really represents the public acting as detectives.
We have to look at the Epso's polling data accompanying the surge. The numbers show exactly where the public stands, regarding the official narrative and the consensus is staggering.
- I have the raw data from the Epso's poll right in front of me. Out of 11,117 adults surveyed, 65% believe the statement is definitely
“or probably true that the federal government”
is hiding information about the death of accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. When you break that specific metric down, 33% say it is definitely true, and 32% say it is probably true.
You do not see 65% of the public agreeing on anything in the modern political climate. - Look at what they're leaving out of the mainstream conversation. That 65% is not some isolated fringe group. Across all political lines,
the belief in an institutional cover up hold steady. - Right, the data shows 57% of Republicans, 76% of Democrats, and 64% of independence believe the government is hiding information about his death. - And a similarly massive percentage,
believe the government is actively hiding the identities of alleged clients. When you see a 1,200% spike in search traffic, you are looking at citizens trying to find the names the justice system refuses to publish.
- The official timeline claims he was an isolated bad actor. According to this narrative, he faced justice in 2008, registered as a sex offender, and was subsequently shunned by high society. - To answer the public's questions,
driving that 1,200%-surt spike, we must trace the timeline of evidence from 2006 onward. We will prove through official documents
that the network did not collapse after his first arrest.
- It only grew stronger. We start the timeline in 2006. The official claim from law enforcement is that they investigated his operation in Florida, which resulted in a closed case
and a standard 18-month sentence. They portray this as a successful prosecution. - That 18-month sentence came with a sweetheart plea deal, granting him work release. He spent 13 months in a county jail,
but he was allowed to leave the facility for 12 hours a day, six days a week. - To go to his own private office? - Exactly, with his own dedicated driver. Federal government, specifically prosecutor Alexander Acosta,
cut a non-prosecution agreement to back federal authorities out of the case completely. They sealed the records and shut down the federal probe. - The official story doesn't match the data. Point to the specific guardian report in the released files.
The official narrative says they had to offer a plea deal because the case was weak. - But evidence existed long before that plea deal, that the primary suspect was actively obstructing justice and threatening violence against witnesses.
You do not hand a 12-hour a day work release program to a suspect threatening violence. - I am looking at the document here, and it specifically says Epstein stole the photos and negatives and is believed to have sold the pictures to potential buyers.
- The report continues. - Documenting that he threatened a witness named Farmer, stating that if she tells anyone about the photos, he will burn her house down. - Think about how the justice system operates
for an average citizen. If you have documented evidence of a suspect
Threatening to burn a witness's house down,
prosecutors do not offer you a non-prosecution agreement.
- They revoke your bail. They hit you with witness tampering and obstruction charges. - Despite this written evidence, federal prosecutors closed their eyes and walked away. But another federal agency opened theirs,
operating completely in the shadows. - We have a newly uncovered heavily redacted document
“from CBS News detailing a secret drug enforcement”
administration probe. I am looking at the document here, and it specifically says the case opened on December 17, 2010, in New York, and the matter was marked to disopending. - That contradicts the evidence presented
by the Department of Justice regarding their timeline of involvement. The DEA requires a specific drug nexus to open a case. You do not get the DEA involved for a closed Florida prostitution case from years prior.
- A drug nexus implies the movement of narcotics across state or international lines, often tied to organized crime. The phrase judicial pending means investigators were awaiting court approval for search warrants,
wiretaps, or other severe legal action. - That probes spanned at least five years. A law enforcement source confirmed the request to the Fusion Center, indicated the matter was part of a significant investigation
rather than a routine information inquiry. - For context, a Fusion Center is a high-level intelligence sharing hub, where federal agencies like the DEA and FBI pool data with local law enforcement to track complex syndicates.
- Look at what they're leaving out. A five-year DEA surveillance operation into a high profile target in New York resulted in zero arrests at the time. - This indicates active ongoing criminal surveillance
by a federal agency that watched his network operate, watched the money move, and intervened zero times.
“- You have to ask yourself why a federal drug task force”
maintained a five-year operation only to quietly bury the findings. - Moving past his 2008 conviction and into the 2010s, the official claim states that after registering as a sex offender, he became a financial and social pariah.
- The narrative insists he was cut off from mainstream banking and elite business circles because his crimes were public knowledge. - That contradicts the evidence entirely. The release document show his wealth and influence rapidly
expanded during this exact period, powered directly by major financial institutions and billionaires who require his specific set of skills. - We pull exhibit A from the Forbes reporting found in the archive.
Private equity billionaire Leon Black paid him $170 million
between 2012 and 2017. - We have to break down the mechanics of that $170 million payment. He was advising Black on complex estate planning. When you were dealing with billions of dollars,
the primary goal is avoiding capital gains taxes. - He helped collateralize Black's massive art collection. By structuring the art as collateral,
“Black could take on hundreds of millions of dollars”
and loans from banks, giving him liquid cash without triggering a taxable event. - His shadow financial services saved Black and estimated $1 billion in taxes. That $170 million fee was not a gift.
It was a commission for engineering a massive tax evasion strategy. - Exhibit B is the systemic banking complicity at JP Morgan. Executive just stately championed him as a top tier client. Bank officials were highly anxious
about his prolific wire transfers and massive cash withdrawals. - Internal accliance teams flag the accounts repeatedly. But on at least four occasions or five years, the banks senior leaders deliberately overwrote
those objections to keep the accounts open. - Over a decade JP Morgan processed more
than $1 billion in transactions for his accounts.
The bank ignored their own internal alarms. - They watched the cash withdrawals, they watched the wire transfers to international accounts and they facilitated every single dollar. - In a $290 million settlement regarding the bank's complicity,
attorney Mimi Lee stated on the record how the institution operated. - I'm looking at the document here and it specifically says, "Epstein's entire business with JP Morgan and JP Morgan's entire business with Epstein
was human trafficking." - The money flowed unimpeded. The federal government possessed direct actionable intelligence on exactly how that money was being used and who was coordinating the logistics alongside
Gisling Maxwell Guillain Maxwell. - We advance the timeline to February 2016. The files contain handwritten notes by prosecutor Brad Edwards detailing a sit down debrief with a Department of Justice. - The notes flag and act of pedophile network,
specifically naming Jean Luke Brunnell and his modeling agency MC2 model management. The financial records show he funded that specific agency. They used MC2 model management as a payroll vehicle to secure work visas for young women,
bringing them into the United States under the guise of little bit modeling contracts. - This provided a legal shield for international border crossings. - The 2016 FBI debrief notes outline the severity
of the intelligence handed directly to the DOJ. I'm looking at the document here and it specifically says, "Audio recorded interview as young as 12, but younger the better." - Look at what they're leaving out of the official history.
The DOJ possessed direct intelligence
on an international trafficking ring
“using model visas as a front in early 2016.”
- The financial institutions flagged the wire transfers funding this operation for separate times. The DEA had already spent five years monitoring the network. - Yet the DOJ took no action until late 2018. They allowed an international trafficking ring
to operate for years after being handed the exact mechanics of the operation on a silver platter. - The official narrative also claims
that powerful figures were unaware of his true nature
and immediately severed ties upon discovering his crimes in 2008. - The official story doesn't match the data. The release documents contain millions of emails proving the elite stayed closely tethered to him, utilizing his money and connections
while actively turning a blind eye to the reality of his operations. - We must state clearly. The Epstein files takes no sides on political figures. - We are impartially reporting the contents of the release files
and not endorsing the viewpoints within them. We examine the data exactly as it appears in the legal archive to understand how the system functioned. - The files detail a massive political shield operating at the highest levels of international government.
“- Former Israeli Prime Minister E-Hood Barak”
appears the files repeatedly. The flight logs and visitor records show him meeting the convicted offender at least 40 times between 2013 and 2017. - Barak and his wife frequently stayed
at the Upper East Side apartment in New York. - The protection extended deeply into American politics long after the 2008 conviction. - Former US Senator George Mitchell is mentioned dozens of times in emails between 2010 and 2015.
- I'm looking at the document here an email from 2011 sent to a Dubai associate. It specifically says, "George Mitchell is my very close friend." - The corporate shield was just as robust providing an air of legitimacy to his operations.
- We examine the timeline of Howard Lutnik serving a Secretary of Commerce. Lutnik told the New York Post he cut ties in 2005 after touring the Manhattan Town House and seeing a massage table.
- Lutnik claimed he and his wife decided
they would never be in a room with him again.
- That contradicts the evidence. The legal documents prove otherwise. A contract for the advertising company AdFIN dated December 28th, 2012, shows Lutnik and the central suspect signatures on neighboring pages.
- Furthermore, the flight logs and visitor records show Lutnik visited the private island with his family in 2012. You do not sign business contracts and take family vacations to a private island
with someone you cut ties with seven years prior. - Linton founder Reed Hoffman claimed he only took meetings for MIT fundraising purposes. The file show active continuous meetings occurring until 2019, shortly before the final arrest.
- The medical and cultural shield operated the exact same way. The elite sought his proximity, his funding, and his network while fully acknowledging the danger of his reputation in private.
- Celebrity Dr. Peter Atia exchanged numerous emails found in the archive. I'm looking at the document here, a 2015 email from Atia. It specifically says, got a fresh shipment with a now-redacted image attached.
- The center confirmed the image belonged to him. Atia wrote back, the biggest problem with being friends with you is that the life you lead is so outrageous, yet I can't tell a soul.
- He was not alone wolf operating in the shadows. He functioned within a highly protected ecosystem. The elite did not shun him, that utilized his money, his connections, and his island. - They engineered business deals
and structured their taxes with him while looking the other way. The network protected him because he was useful to them. - We advance the timeline to the release of the documents themselves,
under the Epstein File Transparency Act or EFTA. This law mandated the uncealing and release of these specific records to the public. - A public was promised full transparency
through the EFTA, EFTA releases. The entire point of the legislation was to clear the air. But an investigation by MSNOW and NPR
reveals the archives are missing critical files.
- We must state again, we take no political sides. Our objective is strictly to examine the DOJ's handling of the evidence and the withholding of legally mandated documents for the public record. - The discrepancy centers on a specific accuser
and a specific set of interviews. - In 2019, the FBI conducted six interviews with a woman who accused Donald Trump of sexual assault when she was a minor. An FBI presentation from the summer of 2019 confirmed
she is the exact same person. - The official story doesn't match the data. The government claims they released everything, but we have physical proof of a cover-up regarding these specific FBI interviews.
“You have to understand how legal discovery works.”
- The release documents possess consecutive EFTA EFTA numbers at the bottom of each page. This baits numbering system ensures every single page has a unique sequential identifier stamped onto it. - Before it is released.
- Independent journalists looked for the 15 documents reflective of her statements to federal law enforcement and state police. - They found only seven, eight documents vanish from the consecutive sequence.
- When you are reading a file and the numbers at the bottom
Jump from page seven directly to page 16,
you are looking at the physical footprint
of a redacted document. - I am looking at the document here, the NPR report covering this exact gap.
“It specifically says, the Justice Department”
withheld and removed some Epstein files related to Trump. - Who authorized the removal of sequentially numbered EFTA pages from a legally mandated public release? - The Department of Justice claims to be fully transparent, but they excised eight pages detailing allegations
of sexual abuse by a former president. - Who benefits from this specific redaction and what legal authority allows an agency to alter a bait stamped public archive? - The DOJ claims the release files represent
the complete picture. Their official stance is there are no further co-conspirators to pursue and the investigation is effectively resolved. - That contradicts the evidence
and the public outright rejects the narrative. This rejection leads directly back to the 1,200% surpspike we established at the beginning. - Citizens realize the official investigations are compromised. The DOJs actively removing pages from the public record
so the public is doing the work the DOJ refuses to do. - Citizens' sleuths are taking the raw data
“and making it accessible to anyone within internet connection.”
- Gen Z programmers bypassed the clunky government FOIA FOY portal to build J-mail. This platform allows the public to search the archive's emails using an interface that looks exactly like a personal Gmail inbox.
- Instead of relying on a broken federal FOIA FOY system that takes years to process requests, the public can read the network's communications directly. - Substack journalists like Ellie Leonard spend their nights coping through thousands of pages
of raw evidence, publishing findings the mainstream press completely ignores. - They're tracing the money, identifying the LLCs and matching the flight logs to the email timestamps. - This citizen investigation
uncovered a bizarre digital footprint hiding in plain sight. Internet sleuths found a YouTube channel created in 2008 named Little Same J1. - The channel belonged to the primary suspect. We know this because of the receipts buried deep
in the email dumps. - I'm looking at the document here and email receipt from YouTube sent to his private server. It specifically says, "Hi Little Same J1, "Welcome to YouTube Red."
- The account was highly active. It provides a real-time window into his behavior while the DOJ claimed he was a reformed, isolated figure. - The digital trail shows the account rendered the movie Husbands and Wives.
It sent a Pokemon Go video to Deepak Chopra. It provided financial backing for a separate YouTube project via Kickstarter campaign. - Look at what they're leaving out. - The account also left a comment
on a video featuring a circus performance. The video highlighted two young trial performers named Diana and Randy. - The comment left by the LinkedIn count stated, "I am part of this wonderful tradition."
- The sheer volume of unchecked evidence has pushed lawmakers to a breaking point. We are seeing bipartisan fury over the DOJ's handling of the EFTA EF2 mandate. - Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle
are investigating the DOJ for withholding files and refusing to prosecute the wider network. - The inaction from federal prosecutors is impossible to justify given the paper trail. We have the banking records, the DEA files,
the flight logs, and the internal emails. - I'm looking at the transcript here, quoting representative Thomas Massey during a recent congressional hearing.
He specifically says over three million documents
describing horrible things, but I haven't seen any arrests or investigations here in the United States from this Department of Justice. - The 1,200 percent spiked in Google searches is the sound of the public waking up
to a timeline of institutional failure. From the 2010 DEA probe that watched him for five years, to the 2016 FBI debriefs detailing international trafficking through MC2 model management. - To the $1 billion flowing through JP Morgan,
to the missing EFTA pages concerning a former president, the evidence points to a system built to protect power, not to expose it. - Consider the magnitude of that architecture. You don't get away with this level
of international logistics without the active ongoing compliance of the very institutions design to stop it.
“- Remember, this is an ongoing investigation”
and everything we cited is sourced at EpsteinFiles.fm. - Next time on the EpsteinFiles.
File 109, the 50 million visitors to the DOJ Epstein library,
what they found. (upbeat music) - You have just heard an analysis of the official record. Every claim, name, and date mentioned in this episode, is backed by primary source documents.
You can view the original files for yourself at EpsteinFiles.fm. If you value this data first approach to journalism, please leave a five-star review wherever you're listening right now. It helps keep this investigation visible.
We'll see you in the next file. (upbeat music)
