Hey y'all, it's Kyra Blackwell from Wirecutter.
New York Times and I test mattresses. Today I am testing 7 mattresses. This mattress is very
“supportive. It's just a very easy to shift position. You've considered nearly 4 dozen foam”
inner spraying and hybrid mattresses. We're looking out for an edge support motion isolation and firmness levels. At Wirecutter, we do the work so you don't have to. For independent product reviews and recommendations for the real world, come visit us at nytimes.com/ Wirecutter. From the New York Times, it's the headlines. I'm Will Jarvis in for Tracy Mumford.
Today's Thursday, September 3rd. Here's what we're covering.
A new Times investigation has found that a deadly explosion at a wedding in Iran this week was caused by a bomb dropped by U.S. forces. The attack, which Iranian officials are calling a war crime, killed at least 5 people, including a 6-year-old boy, and injured at least 67 others, according to an Iranian aid group. It happened on Tuesday night and a port city close to the straight of our moots. American forces said they were retaliating against Iranian attacks.
“U.S. Central Command said it struck communications sites in the region and video showed a large”
communications tower in the city being hit by an air strike and crashing down. About 150 yards away, I witnessed this said another air strike hit a residential area, punching a hole through the roof of a home where guests were gathering for the wedding. Iranian news footage from the scene that the Times verified showed doors shattered, ceilings collapsed and blood on the floor. One local photographer told the times that most of the
injured were women and children, and that in the chaotic aftermath, quote, "People were carrying small children in their arms trying to get them to the hospital and pick up trucks and any vehicles they could find." The Times also collected videos of weapons remnants and shared them with a former U.S. Army explosives expert who said they came from a glide bomb. That type of weapon is used by the Pentagon and not by Iran. In a video published by U.S. forces on the night of the attack,
that same type of bomb appeared to be loaded under the wings of a U.S. fighter jet. In response to questions about the attack, spokesman for central command to said it was "aware of reports,"
and that quote, "DU.S. military never target civilians." Since the beginning of the war,
the Times has documented damage to dozens of health care facilities and other civilian infrastructure in Iran. And my colleagues have found significant evidence that U.S. made weapons were used in deadly strikes on residential areas, a sports hall, and in elementary school.
“I am focused on who I think is currently the most progressive viable candidate in the race,”
and that's not just me saying this either. With just two months to go until the midterm elections, "Come on, she's the only candidate in the race who has not taken a dime of corporate PAC money." The Times has been digging into a surge of videos on social media that are being quietly paid for by political campaigns. We found literally hundreds of influencers around the country who had taken money ranging from a little $10 per post up to huge sums of money to support a candidate.
It's in state races, it's in federal races, it's even in mayoral, and smaller level races. We're seeing this kind of paid content everywhere. My colleague Ken Benzinger covers media and politics for the Times. He says that unless you dug deep into campaign finance reports,
you'd almost never know that some of the people in your social media feed talking politics
are taking money directly from politicians and political groups. In general, there are very few laws requiring any kind of disclosure from social media, influencers when it comes to paid political content, which is different than what we see for commercial content. So if influencers being paid to promote toothpaste or vitamins, they are legally required to disclose that. Likewise, the federal elections commission requires
candidates when they do a billboard or a TV ad to put a message in the bottom of the ad that says paid for by candidate, blah, blah, blah. That is not something that they require for social media influencers in a sense. The regulations haven't caught up to technology at our years behind, and they're just our not good laws requiring disclosure except for an handful of states. Meanwhile, Ken says one of the ways campaigns connect with influencers is by using online platforms
where content creators offer their services to anyone willing to pay. And in some cases, that's had pretty surprising results. For example, it's time we pick a candidate that's actually going to help the everyday citizens here in Michigan a few weeks ago, a young woman went on TikTok to share her support for one democratic primary candidate in Michigan. But the next day, I'm so annoyed right now. So I live in Wisconsin and our utility bills just got doubled.
She posted a video from a separate account, complaining about the cost of living in Wisconsin, and financial records the Times reviewed show that she's actually based in Missouri,
Where she's made more than $30,000 posting on social media.
an isn't fair game, even some people involved in making online political content are calling
“for guardrails. The founder of one group for influencers interested in politics told the Times”
quotes with no standards there's going to be a race to the bottom. In Massachusetts today, a jury is set to deliberate for a sixth day in the high-profile murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, the mother accused of strangling her three young children. The jurors have told the judge twice that they couldn't reach a consensus, and both times the judge told them to go back and keep deliberating. If they can't agree on a verdict, that would mean a mistrial, and prosecutors would
have to decide whether to start the trial all over again. Clancy has not denied that she killed
her children, but over the course of weeks of sometimes wrenching testimony, her lawyers argued
that she can't be held legally responsible, because at the time she was suffering from post-partum psychosis. In the months leading up to the killings, Clancy reported disturbing and intrusive thoughts,
“self-admitted to a psychiatric hospital, and was prescribed a long list of psychiatric medications.”
Her lawyer said that she had heard a voice that ordered her to kill her kids, and despite the horror of what happened, there has been an outpouring of support for Clancy, with hundreds of people showing up outside the courthouse, saying that the health care system failed her. What's been really striking about this case is that it has really sparked a national discussion about how women with maternal mental health issues are treated. Pam Bellic covers health
for the times. She says that while the specific condition at the center of this case, post-partum psychosis is rare. As many as one in seven women experience conditions such as depression, anxiety, or obsessive compulsive disorder during pregnancy, or in the year after having a baby. And recently, as a Clancy trial has been everywhere in the news and on social media, maternal health experts say they're getting tons of inquiries, both from new and
expectant mothers who are worried about their own mental health, as well as from other doctors. Experts who treat severe maternal mental illnesses have told me that they are hearing from obstetricians from community mental health providers who don't specialize in this, from pediatricians from young trainees in the field, who are feeling a little bit out of their depth, they're worried they're going to be missing diagnoses. And so what I've heard over and over again
from experts who work with these patients is that their hope is that this very, very terrible tragedy will also help people understand that their resources available. There's been actually a lot of progress made in treating some of these illnesses over the last several years. And that as heartbreaking as this case is, it might provide an opportunity for there to be improvements in the way that women who are suffering are treated.
And finally, yesterday the NBA handed down the largest punishment in the league's history after an investigation into a scandal that has consumed pro basketball. A year-long probe by the NBA found that the LA Clippers had secretly gone around the league's strict salary cap rules, which are meant to keep an even playing field across the NBA and helped funnel millions of dollars to the Clippers' star player, Kwai Leonard. The scandal burst into public
few last September when the journalist Pablo Torre reported that Leonard had accepted a $28 million
sponsorship deal from a company that had partnered with the Clippers. A deal for which Leonard appears to have done no work. The NBA says that the Clippers' owners Steve Balmer personally helped Leonard secure that agreement, saying it was "off-court income that violated the league's rules." Now, the NBA has suspended Balmer for a year, find the Clippers $30 million, find Leonard himself $700,000, and sanctioned Leonard's uncle, who represented him at the time
the deal was coming together. The Clippers will also lose five first-round draft picks in the coming years, which one NBA reporter said was as close to a death sentence for team building as you can get. In response to the punishment, the Clippers said they vehemently rejected the NBA's findings and pledged to challenge them through every avenue available. For his part, Leonard released a statement saying he regretted the distraction caused by the scandal, and that quote, "I accept
full responsibility for lapses in judgement by people within my inner circle."
“Those are the headlines. Today, on the daily, I think we have to look reality in the face. What we”
have now and what we know now is that these systems do not naturally gravitate toward what we would
Consider good or ethical behavior.
AI system went rogue and what it says about the safety of the technology going forward. You can listen to that in the New York Times app or wherever you get your podcasts. I'm Will Jarvis, we'll be back tomorrow.
