Donald Trump's CIA director, John Ratcliffe, has been throwing Donald Trump u...
this as Donald Trump blamed the intelligence community during his first administration
“for covering up what Donald Trump claimed was "far in election interference," of course,”
everything that Donald Trump said was "completely false and debunked," but when Donald Trump blamed his intelligence community from his first term, guess who was the director of national intelligence in his first term? John Ratcliffe, who was Donald Trump's current CIA director, so Ratcliffe obviously knew what Donald Trump was going to do, so in Donald Trump then declassified a few hundred documents following that disastrous speech, Donald Trump gave at the end of last week.
There were some interesting documents that referenced how China would leak information about
Donald Trump regarding, and then it's all redacted, all odd, the Epstein files, if they thought that Donald Trump was going to engage in any behavior that might harm the Chinese government, and so actually what Donald Trump revealed by declassifying certain documents was that apparently China has dirt on Donald Trump, although it's all redacted, and some of the documents that Donald Trump released talked about how Russia, of course, was
trying to interfere with the 2020 election to help Donald Trump and to set up former president
“Biden and Hunter Biden with various lies about Burisma, and I think John Ratcliffe knew exactly”
what those documents said, and so in Donald Trump tried to attack the intelligence community, which was Ratcliffe, Ratcliffe made sure those documents were included in the batch of documents that were released, but it wasn't just that. I mean Ratcliffe just gave an interview, public interview over here, as part of the Pennsylvania Defense and Innovation Summit, which, by the way, I mean Trump was speaking in events like this as well, and Ratcliffe said
very publicly that one of the big things we have to be very careful of is he says that the Chinese steel technology, they replicate it, the state subsidizes it, and that's their model of success, they're very good at it. So we should not be giving them additional information and technology from the United States. Interesting, because that's Donald Trump's Xi Jinping policy. We're called back on December 8, 2025. Donald Trump posted, "I have informed President Xi of China
that the United States will allow Nvidia to ship its H200 products to approve customers in China and other countries under conditions that allow continued strong national security.
Xi responded positively, 25 percent will be paid to the United States of America.
This policy will support American jobs." Well, definitely supported at that time a little bit, some positive movement in Nvidia's stock, not quite sure about national security, as writers reported at the time. U.S. to allow Nvidia H200 shipments to China. The United States will allow the H200 processors its second best artificial intelligence ships to be exported to China and collect 25 percent fees on such sales. And when Donald Trump was in
China, this past May, what a Donald Trump do? He solidified that deal and Ratcliffe spoke out about it. Now, I'll show you that in a moment, but this also comes at a time where we also learned how the U.S. Commerce Department eased all of its export controls on the United Arab Emirates
“from accessing AI chips and other very highly sensitive technology that, I think, the CIA would”
prefer to be very closely guarded. And what leaked yesterday? Do you remember? I wonder who the source is from CNN here. The Trump regime tentatively agreed to let Saudi Arabia enrich uranium under a draft civilian nuclear deal that would not require the kingdom of Saudi Arabia to adopt the I.A.E.A. It's the International Atomic Energy Agency's enhanced safeguard protocols. CNN reports this deal negotiated in October of 2025 remains unsigned by Donald Trump and nuclear experts warn
it could give re-ad a path toward weapons capability for enriched uranium while lawmakers have not yet
Received the agreement for mandatory congressional review.
deal that the lawmakers have not yet received to allow Saudi Arabia to enrich uranium and potentially bring it to weapons grade, especially as Donald Trump flails and is completely and utterly desperate right now as his escalation against Iran backfires. So I find it very, very interesting that all of that is out there, not to mention, you all have seen the document right that Donald Trump, demonstrative Donald Trump knew he was releasing his document, but take a look at what the document
was about China. Seems like China has some dirt on Donald Trump, which came from that document done from the intelligence community. This is what it says. Redacted redacted weed judge that China will redacted. Evaluate the implications of various electoral outcomes on its interests. If Beijing were to assess that the increasingly downward trajectory in U.S.-China relations threatens China's rise and cannot be dealt with using existing tools, it might attempt more directly to thwart
the president's reelection. This is about Trump in 2020, including by leaking information redacted redacted or through online redacted influence networks, then it shows what it was going to leak about Donald Trump redacted redacted redacted. That brings me to what rap cliff just said
at the Pennsylvania defense and innovation summit. Here's what he says about the Chinese stealing
technology. Trump is handing it to the mayor of play, this clip. And Western companies develop and then the state, and they're very good at it, they steal it, they replicate it, the state subsidizes it, and that's their model of success. And so what I would say from my standpoint at CIA and my
“approach is, and it's always been this way, whatever organization, I think this applies to whatever”
organization or company you're. You know, I never realized how much my shower water was affecting my skin and hair until I switched to jolly. It was one of those things I honestly didn't think about, but after using it for a while, my skin felt calmer, my hair felt softer, and I realized how much chlorine and heavy metals had been working against me. The best part is how simple it is,
the jolly shower head installs in minutes that's basically any shower and the water pressure
is fantastic, that's a big deal to me. It's one of those upgrades that takes almost no effort, but makes your daily routine feel so much better. The jolly shower head is the perfect base for my routine before any skincare or hair care products, and it all starts with the water you're using. jolly made me realize how much better a shower can feel and perform when your water is actually
“working for you, not against you. And honestly, it looks great too. It gives the bathroom that”
clean luxury hotel vibe. Try jolly risk free for 60 days by going to jollyscinco.com/mitis. That's jollyscinco.com/mitis. Jolly is also available on Amazon and Costco both online and in store. Check it out today. Then you had ratcliffe saying that if China gets a technological advantage over us, that's a real problem he says. We can't let that happen. It's already happened here, play this clip. To use your examples of things that are important, if China gets a technological advantage of us,
and I'll just use 5G as an example, the problem is a Huawei created in that space. That's a real
problem. We can't let that happen. So when we talk about things now, like frontier AI models, and the fact that Western technology is ahead, we need to make sure that we're taking advantage of that. And from the CIA's perspective, that means that we have to have the ability to make sure that we're deploying that. And our officers are able to use that. And so the, now, one of the
“things that ratcliffe also said at this time, and I think this was also a message directed to Trump,”
is ratcliffe said, you know, right now in Russia, a new Russian assault troop who is recruited and put on the front lines. Once that Russian soldier is on the front lines, on average, the life span, according to the CIA of that Russian soldier, whether it's true or not, this is what he said, is 20 to 30 minutes on average, because AI drones have become specialized killing machines, and I think that part of this also is a warning to Donald Trump about invading Keshe,
Miland, or about invading the coast of Iran, because Iran has these capabilities as well right now. And you would see, I think, a mass slaughter of U.S. troops have Trump went forward with his
Invasion of Keshe.
expectancy of a Russian recruit right now, arriving on the battlefield in Ukraine is estimated to
“be between 20 and 30 minutes, 20 and 30 minutes. And that's because AI power drones have gotten to be”
such specialized low-cost killing machines. Now, it's not just my read. I mean, you saw the analysis
right after the speech that disaster, a speech Donald Trump gave on MSNow. Here's what one of their
hosts, one of their panelists wrote had to say, here, play this clip. If any of this is true, the person who's in the most trouble here should be John Radcliffe. President Trump saw the intelligence community at the time. And we have the report. So during Donald Trump's first term, John Radcliffe allowed China to get $200 million voter records. Those voter records are public. Again, I'm hearing that there's two senior officials, I'm talking to everyone described them more,
“like, this is all public. This all occurred under John Radcliffe. And right here, I have,”
this is the descent that John Radcliffe submitted in 2021 to the analysis that was done about
foreign influence operations in 2020. And his only complaint in this document is that the effort by China to influence public opinion, disinformation bots, that kind of thing, is larger he thought that the effort China made was larger than the main assessment. This was also made public that this, this should have been a bigger topic that they made this effort. There is nothing in John Radcliffe's descent about votes being switched in any state by China. Nothing.
In fact, in the 2020 report, they made clear that they were not votes changed, right? The one that was his report. Yeah, because Radcliffe was the director of national intelligence at that time. You know, also it should be noted that after Donald Trump speech, Radcliffe put out a statement, but Radcliffe did not agree with Donald Trump that there was election interference or that there was anything to overturn the results of the 2020 election, like that's all phony and Radcliffe.
Just talks about to support Trump's transparency initiatives. The CIA has taken significant steps including providing declassified documents for public release. Well, the declassified document were the China document about China that I was telling you about, and also confirming that Russia spread false claims about Biden and engaged in criminal activity, vis-a-vis Burisma, and it advanced these narratives with U.S. officials, people close to Trump, and planned a
high-profile corruption scandal against Joe Biden under Biden at the peak of the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Now, there's one other piece of this that I think that perhaps Radcliffe was doing alongside of, you know, alongside J.D. Vance. You know, this story came out about how Whitcoff and Kushner, according to, this was said that the Iranian negotiators, who were at Switzerland, and Islamabad when the MOU was being negotiated, which no longer exists, and apparently they told J.D.
Vance that Whitcoff and Kushner were solely there in order to gain insight and information
“to manipulate the markets, and that's what they were there. They were going to look over the”
shoulder of Vance, and their whole goal was to one report back to Netanyahu, what was happening, and to manipulate the markets. That was what the story was out there. J.D. Vance responded to the
whole MOU's letter, and J.D. Vance had that's completely bogus. I never received a message like that.
Steve and Jared are trusted members of the team. I see a lot of BS flying around there, but to me, it's notable that J.D. Vance was highlighting that to begin with. At the same time, you have all this other, you have everything else going on. And so, I mean, I think that J.D. Vance was highlighting it for a reason. It was a denial, but I think it was J.D. Vance pointing people to it, "Why else would you repost the Orm whose letter like that?" My view. Let me know what you think.
Hit subscribe. Let's get to 7 million subscribers. Thank you for watching.
Breaking news right now.
doesn't that just say it all? It comes out officially this October, but you can pre-order your copy today. Just scan the QR code or click the link in the description below. (upbeat music)
