Leaked Police Interrogation Footage of Netanyahu, and How He Cowers Behind War to Keep Power

>> Alex, give me thank you very much for doing this.

So for all the years that Benjamin Netanyahu has been in the American media,

“I think there's very little sense in the US about his domestic troubles in Israel.”

We keep hearing he's been charged and the president of states keeps saying he's to be pardoned, you've made this documentary that explains what is at the core of this controversy, like what are the charges, what is he accused of doing, did he do it? So I'm going to stand back and let you if you would outline what Benjamin Netanyahu's been accused of doing. >> Well, roughly speaking, you'd say it was bribery, or you'd say it was corruption.

I mean, and I can detail the charges, this was a film that I produced and it was directed

by Lexus Bloom, and back in 2023, I got a strange message on signal from somebody who said that they had all of the police interrogation videos from the Benjamin Netanyahu investigation. And they had been investigating Netanyahu since 2016 for charges of corruption. That is to say, trading on his position as Prime Minister to get money in all sorts of favors, jewelry for his wife, very expensive Cuban cigars, hundreds of millions of dollars in forgiveness

of certain loans in order to be able to get favorable coverage on a news website called Wala. So it was a pretty interesting case, and it went from the very small meaning, you know, very expensive Cuban cigars from a rather famous movie producer named Arnawn Milchand to something

very big, which is effectively a $250 million financial arrangement in exchange for coverage,

good coverage for Netanyahu. So it was a pretty big deal.

“But do you got the tapes to the extent you can say where did they come from?”

I can't say where they came from, I can't say anything about the source, but what I can say is we got over a thousand hours of tapes, and these were interviews with Netanyahu himself by the police, also Netanyahu's wife, Sarah, his son, the Iyer, also with a number of key people close to Netanyahu, for example, near hefets, his former head of communications, Sheldon Adelson, who we know in this country, as a billionaire, now deceased, his wife,

Miriam Adelson, Arnawn Milchand, a famous Israeli businessman, arms dealer, who also became a very famous motion picture producer. So it was a kind of an extraordinary array of evidence, and while some of this evidence had been published in Israel in written form, nobody had seen the tapes, and the tapes are very revealing, particularly for Netanyahu, because Netanyahu tries to cultivate

this image of the grand vizier, the great statesman of Israel. Here you see a rather petty corrupt man, desperately lying to save his skin, and his wife who was a deeply entitled woman, trying to claim that, "So what if we got stuff?" I mean, we deserve it, because we're doing so much for the nation, and for the world, and his son, Iyer, who is also extremely entitled, screaming at the police, yelling,

"You're like the stassie." So it was an illuminating look at the actual character behind the facade, sort of like that moment, and the Wizard of Oz, where, you know, Toto pulls back the curtain, and the

“Wizard says, "Please, Pano, attention." And it was real revealing. If you can, and I think”

people watching this will watch the film, but I'm interested in your take having watched a thousand hours of this, what is it? Can you go more deeply into what do you think it reveals about the Prime Minister and his character? Well, I think it reveals, I think, a kind of deep-seated corruption, a willingness to do almost anything to save his skin. I think that he became possessed after the election in 2015

of a sense of enormous arrogance that he was now done in. Because he came back from what seemed to be a defeat to an enormous victory. Now he had this sense of entitlement. Interestingly, then he began to, you know, cash in on that entitlement, and he was caught. But what happened then was that rather, you know, as he heard the sound of the possibility of the jail door slamming

The first thing he tried to do was to essentially fix the department of justice.

“He tried to engage in a series of – this is before October 7. He tried to engage in a series”

of reforms of the judicial system, which would weaken the power of the judiciary in Israel. Most likely, because that would undermine the case against it. That's the most direct likely outcome. But the other thing was that by this time, he had formed a government with an extremely right-wing coalition, with the guy named Ben Gavier, who was head of national security and a guy named Smotrek, who's head of finance. They are extremely right-wing, extremely anti-Palestinian,

and their designs were to expand illegal settlements in the West Bank. And in some cases,

well, well, it was already a dire situation for Palestinians on the West Bank. Nevertheless, there would be judicial orders, which would sometimes get in the way of that. That was another aspect of this. Well, when the Tianhu tried to fix the judiciary, the country rose up, and it was in a huge uproar over these changes, which were fundamentally undermining Israel's democracy. Not too long after, of course, there was the terrible attack by Hamas

on October 7, which shocked Israel. What people began to learn was that for years,

“Netanyahu, again, I think, as part of the way he sees the world and as part of a kind of”

more generalized sense of corruption, had been trying to modulate the relationship with Hamas. And indeed, had been allowing millions and millions of dollars to flow to Hamas from Qatar. Sometimes in bags of cash, traveling through Israel. And the reason he was doing that was to undermine the Palestinian authority on the West Bank in order to be able to allow for his right-wing coalition to get more and more territory via settlements. So all sorts of strange

corrupt deals were happening. But then I think that post-107, which was a terrible moment, I don't want to minimize it in any way, it was a horrific attack. And we show some of that attack in the film.

“But he then launched an attack on Gaza, which was so beyond any sense of proportionality,”

now we have at least over 75,000 people dead. Of course, now we have an Iran war and an 11 on war and so forth. So on. But one of the goals I'm convinced and not me, but all of the witnesses who are very reputable members of the Security Establishment and Israel in the film, indicate that part of the enduring ferocity savagery of the war was due to becoming a wartime president who could then not be prosecuted or successfully prosecuted for the crimes he had committed.

The trial, not only the investigation, but now there's been a trial that the trial is still ongoing. This is 10 years after the investigation started. So long as he's the commander in chief and he's waging war, how dare you attack the president. So in a way, this kind of vinyl personal corruption that starts with cigars and pink champagne for which they had code names and then evolves into corrupt deals relating to the media becomes a mechanism by which slowly but surely the

corruption got greater and greater until it became a moral corruption in which the world is now engulfed. We've got a new partner. It's a company called cowboy colostrum. It's a brand that is serious about actual health and the product is designed to work with your body, not against your body.

It is a pure and simple product, all natural. Unlike other brands, cowboy colostrum is never

diluted. It always comes directly from American grass fed cows. There's no filler. There's no junk. It's all good. It tastes good. Believe it or not. So before you reach for more pills for every problem that pills can't solve, we recommend you give this product cowboy colostrum a try. It's got everything your body needs to heal and thrive. It's like the original superfood loaded with nutrients, antibodies, proteins, help build a strong immune system stronger. Hair, skin, and nails.

scoop of it every morning in your beverage coffee or smoothie and you will feel the difference every time. For a limited time, people listen to our show. Get 25% off the entire order. It's a cowboy colostrum.com. Use the code Tucker at checkout. 25% off when you use that code. Tucker at cowboy

colostrum.com. Remember you mentioned you heard it here first. There were people in Israel in

public right after October 7th, which Claire was committed by Hamas. It was clearly terrible. I agree with that. Want to be clear. But there were a bunch of people, including people. I knew who said, wait a second, this couldn't have happened if the government of Israel had really tried to prevent it. Okay. So there's something very strange about the ability of Hamas fighters on motorbikes and gliders and on foot, coming across the most heavily guarded border in the world

in the delay in the response of the IDF to this. What is this? And it's almost forbidden to say that as you know in the United States. But tell me what people you spoke to in Israel now believe about that attack. I should point out that when you say I spoke to, I mean, the person who directed the film was Alexis Bloom. I got the footage. Alexis, of course. I'm going to ask you to speak for the film.

“Sure, sure. No problem. In any event, I think there were a lot of people who felt that a proper”

investigation into what Nets and Yahoo knew about the possible and pending attack by Hamas should be commenced. However, that got rolled under their carpet because of the fact that he's now in a war with Hamas. I mean, Hamas doesn't really have an air force that he can't properly go. But I think there was a lot of talk about how much and what advance warning Nets and Yahoo may have

had about the October Senate attacks. I've never seen, you know, primafashi evidence of that fact,

but there's certainly a lot of talk about it in Israel. Okay, so it's not just crazy people on the internet who think it's possible or likely that Benjamin Netanyahu knew this was coming. Had some sense it was coming. Didn't do his best to prevent the damage within Israel because he was in this politically tough spot. And the ensuing war would take the attention off him and allow him a pass on the charges. Is that a transformation? I personally think it may be a bit too

cynical to think that that that he literally engendered an attack in order to encounter attack. But I do think that he had diluted himself in part because he thought of the world as a series of deals. He had diluted himself and into the idea that he had manipulated Hamas and all the money has flowing to Hamas. Yeah. You know, wasn't going to go to weapons and preparing an attack. I mean, he kept saying, what's the phrase? It's in the film that he could control the height of the

flames by by the introduction of money. Oh, and I, you know, that sounds bad bother when he's talking to the police. He says, keep your friends close and your enemies closer as if he was the don and sort of able to manipulate events. But he clearly was not. That seems like a smart interpretation to him. Of course, I don't know. But that sounds that sounds plausible, entirely plausible. So then

“October 7 happens. I think most Israelis are genuinely shocked that it happened and they're horrified.”

And a lot of the world is genuinely shocked and horrified, including me. But then this war begins in Gaza or this leveling of Gaza, this mass murder in Gaza. And then it expands to a lot of the region in a Levant and now into Iran. Is it too cynical to think that one of the motives there from the Prime Minister is to just keep moving forward? Because if he stops, he gets arrested. Well, it may be a little bit too cynical. I mean, baby, nothing y'all who's wanted to attack

Iran for years. In fact, they did another film about that subject called zero days. But I do think that what's the momentum of war began? And I would say also that to some extent, the momentum of war began to have a certain popular impact among the populist in Israel, too, that now there was an opportunity to go after more enemies. And it had the byproduct, of course,

as long as there's war, as long as there's permanent war, Netanyahu never be held to account.

“So once again, I think it may be a bit too cynical to say he attacked Iran. So he wouldn't go to jail.”

But I think it had been a longstanding desire for Netanyahu to want to really go after Iran.

coming to power in 2024, suddenly he had an opportunity.

“Yeah, that that sounds right to me. So what how is he regarded the Prime Minister in Israel?”

It's hard to know if you're not there. What's your view? I agree. I think it's fair to say that there's a robust group of people who are vehemently anti-Netanyahu, and believe he's destroying Israel and destroying democracy in Israel. And indeed, making the country a pariah worldwide, I would agree with that point of view. However, I would also say that war has a peculiar effect on people and can engender a sense of nationalism, which I believe is rising. Not only

a sense of nationalism, but their nationalism undergirded by the undertow of of of of of of of victimhood. So so Netanyahu is is very much using that. And I think it would be a mistake to think that he's unpopular. Well, find out very soon, you know, when elections happen, but but I think that as long as you're waging war, people tend to rally around the commander in chief,

“which I think is both a cynical boy by Netanyahu, and also a longstanding goal of his to be able”

to wage war across the Levant and expand Israel's power and influence. Did you get a sense of his religious views? I think if Netanyahu is, well, honestly,

he's pretty American and Western and secular, but in his, I mean, the first statement he gave

after the war on Iran began, he began with today's Torah portion. And he's been saying things like that a lot. Do you have an opinion on what he thinks what his spiritual views are? It's hard for me to say. I mean, I think that to some extent, I see him more as a politician. Now, I don't have access to what his real views are, but when you hear politicians quote, "excription" effect, it tends to be for the reason that they're trying to

“undergird their policies with the force of God. It's an old script, and I think Netanyahu knows”

very well that it's an effective one. That would be my, my God. I really don't know or have any insight into what he believes when he's alone in a room, what his relationship is with God. Yeah, what we can't know, but it does seem like the country is changing fast. That's my perception as a visitor. It's not a good thing, and we can also see that this hard right-wing faction has wreaked havoc on the on the West Bank, and you know, settlements are expanding a pace

in a really reprehensible way. There's lots of, you know, it's sort of out of the public eye, but that I think was the one of the goals from the beginning, you know, with this reckoning, with Hamas and all of this stuff, but also, you know, because Netanyahu in order to stay in power, another corrupt deal, he makes a deal with the hard right, and then goes very hard right. It's not like he was ever a piece Nick, but now he goes very, very, very hard right, and at the great expense

of the lives and livelihoods of many Palestinians. Yeah, I don't know if it's right or not, I'm on the right, and I hate this, I hate violence, and there were reports this morning of in the Israeli press of mass rapes of Palestinians by settlers in the West Bank, so like I think that's just a great violence by by by by settlers on Palestinians in the West Bank, is is rapacious. I mean, it's it's and it goes on day after day after day after day after day after day.

Ranchers built to America, Fidier Country for over 250 years through droughts and wars and recessions and pandemics, and anything else that happened, didn't matter to them, because they had to come through and they did. That legacy is the one that our partners at Good Ranchers continue and represent. Good Ranchers is a meet company, it's 100% committed to this country. Now just in words, but in practice, every cut they offer is raised, un United States, Farms, and Ranchers,

their entire packaging and fulfillment operations are right here in the US, same with customer support, imagine Americans on the other end of the line. Let's good ranchers donate to portion of all profits good veteran organizations. We use good ranchers ourselves, we love it, the subscriber experience is super easy, order requires just a few clicks,

simple flexible, and built around your schedule. So you can support a company that sells an amazing

when you start your plan, you get to pick a free meet that'll be included in every order for

life where you get $25 off your first order by using the code Tucker. Tucker is the code

for $25 off. GoodRanchers.com American Meet Delivered. So since you're the producer of this film, do you mind if I ask you about your experience, so you come into possession of a thousand hours of tape, which is not public, you're not saying understandably exactly how you got it, but it's real. I mean, probably a lot of people don't want you to make that into a documentary and air it, so what was your experience of that? That's where to say, and indeed, when we tried to produce

“the film in secret, I had some able helpers. I mean, not only was Alexis Blum, an extraordinary”

talented woman directing it, but in Israel, we were aided by a gun and revive Drucker,

who was a noted journalist in Israel and helped us to contextualize some of this stuff. But we had a sense that we had to keep it secret while we were making it, and then we sort of launched an event at the Toronto Film Festival in 2024. It was a work in progress, because we felt at that moment, this kind of thing needed to be seen on Netanyahu himself, went to a court in Israel to try to stop the premiere of the film at Toronto. He was utterly unsuccessful,

but I should note also that the American media played a kind of unseemly role in the sense that

we went to NBC first, and we were going to do a rather big piece in advance of the

premiere in Toronto, and then we were told at the last minute that, oh, NBC has decided that we're not going to do the story, because it would probably upset Netanyahu and that would limit our access to the Prime Minister. They said that? Yes, they said that to me. That's correct. What? Not what I would regard as a deeply courageous move by a journalistic organization.

“Yeah, I mean, I think journalistic is probably too strong. But wow, I'm just, I mean, I've worked”

at that company. I'm just surprised that they were as blunt as they were to you. What did you say? I was just shocked. I mean, because I was ready to, I was ready to do the Netanyahu. I believe it was Andrea Mitchell. I was shocked. And part of the reckoning was, it was both brave and bad journalistically, but also sort of corrupt in the sense that they suggested that they might have gone with it. If they themselves had discovered the police interrogation videos,

but they weren't going to risk their capital with Netanyahu for something that they themselves didn't discover. The idea of the public good or the public reckoning didn't seem to be part of the equation. It was a very disappointing moment. Probably not that surprising. I mean, in general, the coverage of what happens there is, well, not existing or not consistent with reality in the United States. But did you pause at all before embarking on this? Once you got the tapes, did you think

maybe it's not a good idea long-term for me to get involved in something like this? No. I felt it was

“really important because those tapes, once I was able to verify them and to understand them better,”

I felt they shed really important life on a vital figure in rural politics. And that's in yes. And so it seemed to me that that's that's my job. And when I find out important information about public figures that shed light on on on on on on on wars and and and and and and how we reckoned with the world that it's it's my job to get that story out. So I actually didn't pause, but it took a while to figure out because I'm not a network. You know, I'm an independent filmmaker

and it took a while to figure out how to raise the money, how to and also to do it in secret so that nobody would subpoena the tapes or, you know, prevent me from from getting to the end. So, you know, we, we, Alexis and I had to proceed, you know, for some time in, in secret. But, you know, it was, I felt it was really important material and really important to get it out. Good for you. How

and there were a number of people who also once they were able to to see a little bit of what we had came forward and and and helped. So, so yeah, we were able to do it. I mean, it was, but it was, it was, it was mining a different source. It wasn't the traditional way where you go to your bureau chief and you say, please give me the resources of the corporation. And let's go get this story. We know it. Yeah, definitely isn't. So, we've tried for the beginning just to advertise

businesses that have like-minded values businesses that make things or find services that we actually use that seem like decent people that don't hate us or you. And that's one of the reasons that we have aligned with charity mobile. So, when you make the switch, charity mobile sends 5% of your monthly plan price to the pro-life, pro-family charity of your choice that's millions of dollars in counting sent to pro-family philanthropies. So, it sounds great, but charity mobile must be really

expensive to be doing that. Well, no, they're not. They've literally never raised their mobile

plan prices and no plan exceeds $50 a month. So, it's a good company with good service and it's got good prices. If you switch today, you keep your number with a compatible phone, no compromise on quality and you support a company that's actually doing good things. Use promo code Tucker to get a free phone with free activation, free shipping and a free gift with every new line of service. Visit charity mobile.com/tucker. Do you expect any consequences going forward? I mean,

“presumably you hope to make other films. Will this make it harder? I don't know. I think that”

we live in a moment where people all over the world, including in this country, are making it difficult for independent voices to be heard. So, yeah, I reckon with that, but I feel like even though, and I'm glad you, you know, TCN is showing BB files on its network and it has had pretty good international distribution. The distribution here has been somewhat handicapped. But, can you tell us about that? I mean, it seems like even if I disagree

with your views, which I don't know that I do, I don't think I do, but I would just stop at you have relevant information. That's real about one of the key players in global politics. So, like that alone justifies this in my opinion. And so, the idea that you would have distribution problems in the United States is a little scary and I'd love to know more about what those problems are.

“I think one of the problems is that the market in general is controversy of verse. You know,”

you have a number of streamers who don't want to upset their viewers. You have news organizations which in this case, as I've documented, you know, also didn't want to be on the wrong side of an issue that might upset people. I mean, it seems to me that the job, because I do think that four years ago, roughly speaking, you know, if I had gone out into the marketplace with the BB files, there would have been a bidding war. But now it's kind of just the opposite. It's like we don't

want to do anything that might upset people because then they won't buy sneakers or they won't buy iPads. You know, so that's part of it. And I think part of it is that controversy has become

problematic and also powerful political figures are exerting influence on broadcasting outlets

to the line. And sometimes if you're not, you know, you don't have a regular show, you don't get a

“hearing. So it's a problem. It's a really big problem. I think the, you know, well, I'm critical”

of the mainstream press, particularly in this, in this instance, you know, I believe strong in the idea of a free press. Yes. And, and deeply upset about the way a not only Netanyahu didn't in Israel, but the way the Trump administration is trying to suppress a free press in his country. So it's a dark time for this. How long have you been doing this kind of thing? Well, that's a good question. Um, you know, I guess I've been doing it. I've been an independent

of freelance since, um, geez, since the 1980s. So somehow, some way, I've been, you know, managing

to scrape by. Um, and I've never really worked for an organization except for the small company that

is chigsaw productions, which is my happiness. Have you ever seen an environment that's difficult

community? Not really. There was another period in the late 90s, um, in this country. I remember

trying to do a film about, it was critical of Henry Kissinger. And, uh, I had an easy, the BBC was,

was actually heroic, and that instance, but I could find no finders here. And it's only by going to,

“um, I think we played at the film form for something like three months that finally it allowed,”

because it was then entertainment. It allowed a broadcaster show it. It was difficult then,

but it's much more fraught now. I think it's very, very, very hard to get independent voices,

“or it's, um, it's really unprecedented in my experience at this moment. Yeah. Well, thank, that's”

certainly my feeling, but I don't have the, the 40-year perspective that you do, so, um, but I admire

your dedication to a free-pressure bravery in doing this, and your willingness to explain it to us and to air it on T-SAN. So thank you very much, Alex Kibney. Thank you, Choker.