Whistleblower Reveals the Largest Mass Surveillance Operation in History and the Coming Slave State

in 1984, written in 1949 right after the Second World War, and it is famously a picture

“of the dystopian future where the state controls everything.”

And if you can think back, the novel not quite as widely assigned now, your kids are probably not reading it if you're under 40, you may not know exactly what it is, except it's like a synonym for the state being overbearing, big brother is watching you. But it's worth remembering what 1984 describes, because it is so, so precious. It does not describe a lot of physical repression by the state.

In the end, there is torture and there are illusions to killing. But the state in 1984 doesn't spend a lot of time putting gun barrels in people's faces. It doesn't need to. What it does instead is spy on them. Their cameras everywhere in 1984, something called the Telescreen, which when the novel came out in 1949 seemed very space age, it was a screen, and it listened while you spoke.

It eased dropped on you, and it bombarded you with pre-recorded propaganda messages. And again, when this came out, it was impossible to imagine say the iPhone, which is

“listening to you at all times, or one of those seatback screens on Delta Airlines that's”

yelling at you without your permission about some credit card deal. No one reading 1984 at first came out had any reference point for this level of surveillance. There was famously a guy called Jeremy Bentham who was a liberal reformer in the 19th century. He had the greatest idea in the history of human progress called the Panopticon. And the idea was, we're going to build prisons with a round design.

So one officer can see everybody in the prison. All the cells will be open, and one guy can see everybody.

And of course, he can't see everyone at once, but inmates will never know when he's

looking, so they'll know at all times that they could be under surveillance. And that will compel them to obey. They'll be a lot more obedient once they suspect we're watching. That was the whole idea of the Panopticon, meaning see anywhere. So apart from that, kind of cookies supposedly well-meaning, but actually totalitarian theory

of Jeremy Bentham's, nobody had really constructed a state capable of watching or listening to everything that people did because the technology wasn't there. You just couldn't do it until 1984. And it painted once again a pretty accurate prediction, as it turned out, of what the future was going to look like.

But what's interesting, there's a scene in there where the protagonist in the novel, without being boring about it, got called Winston Smith, meets another person and has a kind of low-grade love affair with this woman called Julia. And the reason this is notable in the book is because there are very few love affords, in 1984, or in a world with this kind of surveillance because they're impossible.

One of the things you learn when you lose your privacy is that you can't have intimacy without it. Intimacy is by definition exclusive. It is a relationship between a very small number, usually two people. You can't have an intimate DMV line or concert.

Your bedroom, you hope, is intimate, and that's because not everyone's invited. So without privacy, there is no intimacy. People can't say what they really think. People are afraid that everyone can hear what they're saying. And so they don't say it and after all, they don't think it.

So the main takeaway from the novel is you don't need to beat people or shoot them to get them to comply. You only need to spy on them and then tell them that you're spy on them and they will know that they have to constrain their own behavior. They will be so terrified and alone, so completely isolated that after a while, they won't

be capable of having revolutionary thoughts.

They will accept whatever you tell them.

“So stripping people of their privacy is the key to enslaving them.”

So in the novel, Winston Smith and Julia decide we're going to try to have a normal conversation and so they go to Paddington Station London and they take the train out to the countryside. And they stand in a pasture and they have a conversation and that's the kind of extent of their intimacy. But it's thrilling within the context of this dystopian privacy-free world.

They go out into the countryside and there they can talk freely. There they can be truly themselves. There they can be honest and be intimate with them. They're human being. Breakout of the prison of solitude that the state has cast them in.

What's interesting, if you think about it, is that even or well who died months after finishing

in now in the United States in 2026, or even driving to the countryside, much less taking the train to the countryside, is no escape from non-stop surveillance because cameras are everywhere. And cameras aren't simply recording you, they're listening to you and analyzing your biometrics, your gate, your face.

There is almost, if you look at a metropolitan area in the United States, no place you can go from your bedroom to the grocery store to the sidewalk in front of your house or apartment, where you're not being surveilled at all times 24 hours a day.

“Who knows what's happening to the images and sounds, those cameras are capturing that data?”

We actually don't know. And there's really no legal safeguard in place to let us know or to protect us from the misuse of that information, information about us, remarkable. How did this change so fast and were you consulted on the change? Did your local lawmaker ask you, would you like to be spied on 24 hours a day?

No, of course no one asked, in fact until very recently, most Americans were not even where this was happening. There's been an explosion in surveillance in one specific area, which is misleadingly named automatic license plate readers. So the idea is that a camera either affixed to a pole or bolt to the side of a building

or increasingly in a drone takes pictures of a license plate and runs that information back to police headquarters presumably or corporate headquarters.

“And that information can be used to track down the fabled child traffickers.”

Everyone in charge is so upset about child traffickers. There's not a single member of Congress who isn't very exercised by the existence of child traffickers, even the ones who opened up the Southern border and led in tens of thousands of child traffickers. They're very upset about child traffickers and because child trafficking is America's

most pressing problem, everybody in the country, all 350 million need to be spied

on at all times, but just your license plate. Well, it's become clear in recent months that these license plate readers are doing a lot more than reading license plates. In fact, there's no law that says they have to constrict their spying to people's license plates.

They can spy on people and cars and they could do facial recognition and they can listen to what you say and indeed they are.

“So there are a lot of companies that provide this service.”

The biggest and certainly the most famous is called flock, flock safety. The idea behind flock safety is police departments will use its product, its drones or its cameras to fix the poles in their towns to reduce crime. And from the perspective of the police department, it's a pretty good deal. And it's a good deal because it's a whole lot cheaper than police officers.

Police officers are very expensive, it costs over a hundred thousand dollars a year on average to employ a police officer over the course of an entire police career through recruitment and training and sick days and, of course, salary and then retirement, it can cost seven

million dollars to a city for a single police officer.

But if you were to switch, if you're to automate the process, if you're to get a machine to do what people once did, it cost you about 2,500 bucks under the flock contract. So you can certainly see the incentive, of course, lost in this is any privacy or even interaction with the human being with whom you might relate in some way, personal interactions coming far too expensive in the new digital economy.

But you can certainly see why city councils and mayors and police chiefs would be incentivized would have great incentive to use flock cameras instead of people. The problem is it's not clear what the rest of us are getting in return. So the promise and it's inherent in the name flocks safety is that if you give up your privacy, you're pre-existing, you thought right to kind of walk around without having

your face analyzed and sent to headquarters somewhere in this or in another country. If you were to give up all privacy, you would in exchange get what safety. Of course. And that's the trade always.

And the problem is it hasn't worked that way because safety has never been a priority

of this ruling class. There was a time when big city mayors and police chiefs and governors and even presidents said explicitly, look, we're going to crack down, but in return, you're going to get the kind of country that is clean and orderly safe for your daughter or grandmother to go to the store.

No one's getting raped in my country and we may need to crack a few heads, but you will

And for years, a bipartisan Republican and Democrat agreement remained in place.

“That the first order, the first job of government was to pride safety for its citizens”

because without that, what else do you have? Doesn't matter what your GDP is, if I don't know, the downtowns of your biggest cities are open air drug markets or hundreds of people are getting shot to death, it doesn't matter.

So you first have to provide safety.

But somewhere around 30 years ago, that part of the deal ended. And big city mayors, governors, members of Congress sort of forgot that their number one duty is to provide safety to the population. And this kind of reached the most obvious and hilarious point five years ago when those same people, members of Congress, governors, big city mayors, even police chiefs were calling

for some version of defunding the police. How about no police at all? Well, you think it's dangerous now? How about we just don't enforce any law? How does that sound?

And they told us that they were not embarrassed at all, opposing funding. The police was a prerequisite to being anti-racist. So it was really a kind of moral test.

Anyone who's for the police hated black people, obviously in case you were here when

that happened. But this was a widely understood principle in every channel, including Fox News told you about this. Anyone who's for the police, particularly white police, is just a racist. Just cousin to a Nazi.

What's interesting is that some of those exact same people, literally the same people,

“are now telling you that you have to have cameras everywhere in drones, on light poles and”

buildings. In fact, now even in your car, thanks to an active Congress, a lot passed recently by the United States Congress, mandates cameras in all new passenger vehicles that assess the face of the driver. Whether he's eating or yawning or who knows what he's doing, having a private conversation

while there are no more private conversations, even within the confines of your own vehicle. Why? Because safety. Their drunk drivers out there. Of course, it was only two years ago that Joe Biden explained, well, actually drunk

driving is not a big deal with illegal aliens do it. Somehow that standard has been revised, drunk driving is such a big deal that you can have a private conversation in your own car anymore, according to the U.S. Congress. And in fact, that is a law and it's going to happen. So how exactly has this brand new but already incredibly widespread phenomenon, flock cameras,

license plate readers, and virtually every city in the United States, what is it done to crime?

“Well, it has not eliminated it despite what they may tell you.”

So one of the cities that has the most licensed plate readers in the United States is Houston, Texas.

Harris County, Texas, which is a huge place, but 4.7 million people in Harris County, Texas.

It's about the size of Oman or New Zealand. It's a lot of people. And it also is a famously high murder rate. Lots of different kinds of crimes, but murder is the most straightforward because almost all murders are accounted for, because there's a body in a missing person sometimes.

So murders go reported. So we know pretty much precisely how many murders a city has. Harris County, Texas has over 3,000 licensed plate readers in it in the county. So you would think about 3,700, actually. So you would think with 3,700 licensed plate readers all over the city, when you look at

a map of where they are in Harris County, I mean, there's nowhere you can go where you're not being watched. You would think you would be the safest place in the United States, but weirdly, Harris County, Texas had over 500 murders in 2025. The murder that aggregate number of murders, the total murders in Harris County, Texas has

risen dramatically over the past 10 years. Even as surveillance has become so intense, there is literally no place to hide. Now how does that work? Exactly. How is it that we increased the surveillance past what 1984 describes and we still have 500

murders in one U.S. county? Hard to know how that happened, but one conclusion we can draw confidently is that the point of the license plate readers and the facial recognition software, which are integrated, probably not to keep you safe. So if you're looking for a shortcut to decode everything that you're hearing about almost

anything, discount the part where they say it's good for you, because that is not a relevant component to the formula. Should we do this? Well, let's say, does it save us money? Does it increase profit?

Is it good for us? Those are the three main criteria. What it does to you and your family, it's kind of not on the list. It's not a variable in that equation. So it is clear, in fact, it's proven that if you turn a city into a panopticon, you

but you have no more privacy, which is to say you have no more intimacy, which is to say

you have no more freedom, because privacy is a prerequisite for freedom. You cannot be free unless you can have independent thoughts and privacy and independent thoughts are impossible without privacy, which is why when the U.S. military wants to train its pilots on what life in a prison camp must be like. Very often it puts them in a glass box naked in the center of the faux prison camp.

That is a form of torture, because you are stripped entirely of privacy. There is nowhere to hide, everyone can see you at every moment.

“And what does that do to people that tends to drive them insane?”

And yet the U.S. government, state, federal and local, has now constructed exactly that. A glass box at the center of a prison camp, and we all reside in it. So what do you do about that exactly? Do you go to your city council meeting and complain? That's been tried, and if you're interested, go online.

You can see video after video of concerned and very kind of fourth right and reasonable

citizens asking their city council members like, "Why are we doing this? Why am I paying for this?" And what about my fourth amendment, right? That prevents search unreadable search and seizure without a warrant by the government. And in every single case, we could find there just blown off like some annoying crank.

Oh, shut up. Safety. Safety. And eliminate cigarette smoking while live forever. It's not like the life expectancy is going to go down if we do that.

Oh, but it did. So the point is, license plate readers are safe and effective, and if you don't believe that,

“you're obviously anti-science, shut up science denier, what do you for the drug cartels?”

Oh, no, that would be the government.

They're in business with the drug cartels, but normal people cannot get a hearing on this question. Congress has made no effort to ban it or even regulate it to protect, say, images of you or your conversation with your wife and or girlfriend or anyone else from being sent anywhere. And no law preventing other people from stealing your conversations and your image in the

most intimate moments of your life, like in your car and sending it to anybody or selling it to anybody. Now, some of these companies like Floc claim they don't, okay, hope that's true. Is it? We don't know, and how would we know?

So it's not an endorsement of vigilante justice or vandalism, of course, which we are not for the record endorsing. But is it out of the realm of possibility that if you set up a system like the one just described that some people will say, I've got no option, but to take these cameras down myself?

Well, in fact, that's exactly what a lot of people will conclude, including this man. Watch. You have plans to continue to take down this book. Absolutely. No, absolutely.

They are clear and present threat to public safety. 44 year old, Javan Martinez is facing larceny property damage and tampering with evidence charges. After police say, he destroyed three Floc cameras costing Rio Rancho thousands of dollars in damage.

You know, you call me, but I am here. I'm here. I walked up there. She wanted my name, but I have a right to not bear testimony against myself, giving my name consults as testimony, and so I just chose to remain silent.

Oh, guy in an American flag shirt, quoting the Constitution, he must be a dangerous radical, but a kill that guy. He knows his rights. That's not acceptable. So there are a lot of people like that.

And if you go on the internet, at least as of yesterday in this may change in the H.V.A.I. who knows, but as of very recently, there are dozens, maybe hundreds of similar videos of people destroying license plate readers, cutting down the polls running into one of their cars, spray painting them, their how-to videos and how to disable them with high-powered lasers.

You can buy an Amazon.com, which apparently fried their circuits. We're not endorsing that, of course. But their videos, in other words, of people who don't feel they have any other recourse whatsoever, making one last-ditch attempt to preserve the one thing that makes them free in this or any other country, their birthright by the way, and it's called privacy.

They don't have it. They'd like it back. The Constitution guarantees it to them. Their lawmakers don't care. Their leaders don't care.

Their police departments don't care. They don't think it's to make them safer. They understand that it's to strip them of their most basic humanity, which it is.

“And so they're doing the only thing they can imagine doing.”

The only thing the powerless really can do in a situation like this, they're taking matters into their own hands. And some of them are being punished for it.

behind it.

And if that guy is any measure of who's doing it and judging by the videos we saw,

he definitely is. A measure of exactly who's doing it. It's not the malcontents. It's not drug-addicted kids, knocking down flat cameras for fun. It's sober, decent patriotic Americans who believe the promises of their country.

They're mad not because they're trying to get something from flock, but because they want to be left alone by flock. Because flock was not part of the country they signed up for. No one asked their permission to steal their images and to spy on their conversations, to read their license plates.

Do any person with any capacity for reasoning and with any empathy for other human beings

may not endorse that behavior, but can certainly understand it.

And enlightened people might work to some kind of compromise. Maybe there are ways we can use technology to lower crime and make it safer for your grandmother to go to the grocery store. That would be good. But maybe we can do that without eliminating your humanity by taking away your privacy.

But that's not, of course, the posture of the billionaires who run flock safety, safety. Here is the founder of flock safety. Garrett something, doesn't look like he's even 40. This is Garrett, the billionaire flock guy, describing how he feels about anyone who disagrees with his project.

Watch. Corporate wars, looking at citizen projects where citizens concerned about the rise of flock and flock cameras going up everywhere and increased surveillance everywhere. As a organisation called Deflock, who sent me well-known, I guess, have you interested in this stuff, who take a fairly aggressive approach in terms of counting the number

of cameras and having a discord channel where they talk about potential activities to move against flock and stop it expanding.

“What do you think of that organisation in the way they go about that business?”

Yeah, so many of these are two groups of activists. You've got organisations like the ACLU and the FF who take an above-a-board approach to fight for their point of view. And thankfully, we live in a beautifully democratic capitalistic country where we can fight in court.

And I have a lot of respect for those groups because they have reasonable debates and we follow that law. And then, unfortunately, there's terrorist organizations like Deflock, whose primary motivations chaos. They are closer to antifa than they are, anything else.

And now, I think, is unfortunate because we don't want chaos or I don't want chaos. I like law and order, I like a society that has a bedrock of safety. You'd be interested to know where the douchebag factory is that turns out billionaires

in t-shirts who run our most powerful companies, who is that guy?

He's a billionaire, where the money come from, oh, from state and local governments, that's it's tax dollars, Mr. T-shirt guy, Garrett, Garrett, Langley or something. He just described a group called Deflock as a, quote, terrorist organization or what's Deflock? Well, if that's the only knowledge you have of Deflock, you probably think it's, as he

said, it's like in T-Fa, guys in black mass, spray painting things and beating people over the head of the flag poles and shooting bear spray into the faces of cops and T-Fa, you want chaos, well, actually unlike in T-Fa, Deflock has a website, so you can just

“kind of go there and assess for yourself, what is Deflock?”

Well, the answer was in the question and it was accurate. Deflock is a group on the internet that tells you where the fuck cameras are, that's what they do. They have a map, they're not for fuck cameras or any licensed plate readers, they think they're violation the fourth amendment, they think they're an invasion of your privacy,

they think they're dehumanizing, all true, by the way. But what they really do is keep track of where the monitors are, where are you being surveilled and you can go on the map, it's Deflock.com and find out where they are in your neighborhood and by the way, it's overwhelmingly likely that you have them in your neighborhood that you're being watched, you didn't even know it.

That's because the people are supposed to be protecting you, actually protecting you, like the mayor of your town, the chief of your police department or your member of Congress your governor, they should be telling you, but they don't, because they don't care at all about you or your privacy. And so Deflock steps, and this is maybe you'd like to know where these cameras are.

And in some cases, because the information is out there, the guy in the American flag shirt

“and the somewhere else made to disable the camera, okay?”

But most people would like to know, and so providing that information is terrorism, really. To think about what T-shirt Deutchbag guy is saying, the billionaire, they've got rich

everything.

We don't even know we're here.

Actually, we have a drone overhead that if the distance of hundreds of yards can see everything about you, just like a military drone. And that information is going, well, we're not going to tell you where it's going. I mean, it's proprietary information that's going to the client, but what's he doing with it?

He's selling it to insurance companies to other governments, to companies to data brokers who can sell to all the above. That's not happening. I don't know. Mr. T-shirt billionaire, is it happening?

Shut up. But in other words, he's reserving the right to use tax dollars to know everything about you.

“But if you want to know anything about their company, Flock Safety, you're a terrorist,”

or you're a terrorist. It's a terrorist organization.

Or they keep any acts of terror.

No, they're actually disseminating knowledge that he's not contesting his factual. He's not saying it's wrong. It's accurate. That's why he calls them terrorists. How dare you?

You get to know everything. This is sort of the deal that government has with us, or federal law enforcement has with us. You lie to an FBI agent. Any federal agent?

Go right to jail. And then if you live long enough, you'll know people who do go to jail for doing that. So of course the FBI can't lie to you, right? In other words, you're employees that you pay who work for you, and if the agent works for you, hey, get me up a coffee, son.

That's the posture. He works for you. He's your employee. He's your housekeeper with a gun. You're paying his salary.

“But if you lie to him, you go to jail, but he is absolutely allowed to lie to you.”

It does all the time, and faces no penalty because there's no law against it. Well that's called asymmetrical. That's called unjust. And that's been true for a long time. But now you have a so-called private sector company, a defender of what he described, the

T-shirt kid billionaire described as capitalism. Capitalism. Capitalism, huh? Taking money from the public without their consent, spying on them, and then if they try to even know what's going on, their terrorists like Antifa who are against order.

Yes, so that's not a sustainable system, by the way. And across the country, these very obvious and clearly identified on deflock.com.blest them for doing that, cameras are under assaults, hard to know how many flock on their websites says not many. What seems like a lot.

But pretty soon it won't matter because they're going to be in drones. And unless you're an extremely good shot with a tightly choked 12 gauge, you're probably not going to knock one down. And if you do, you're going to write to jail, just charge a firearm. So they get to like hover over your bedroom window.

If they want, there's no law against it, watch you and your wife and listen. But if you take any action at all, or even complain to loudly or tell other people that it's happening, you're a terrorist. Okay now. So while we can, in other words, while these surveillance devices, this whole North Korean

set up that we're building here in the United States, is still visible to us before it's all airborne, and there's literally nothing you can do about it. You might not even know what's there. That point, they'll be no way to identify. They'll be no deflocked for drones because they're mobile.

So during this moment when we can talk about it, it seems like maybe it's worth talking about it.

“We're not big on debt, but there are times when you have to take a loan, can't put it”

on your credit card in 30% interest. You got to go to a bank, but going to a big bank is a very unpleasant experience. That's why we recommend Cardiff. Cardiff is a small business lender, America's favorite and for good reason. 20 years of experience, $12 billion loan.

Cardiff has a simple way to secure capital for your business without the endless bureaucracy you're going to get at a massive bank in New York. This is fast, the application is takes three minutes, approval is going to happen just as quickly. The barrier to entry is low.

If you've been in business for at least one year and make at least $20,000 a month in revenue, that's revenue, not profit. Just money in, you could qualify for up to 500 grand. Those funds can hit your account that the day your loan is approved.

Small business is the American economy, always has been, we hope it always will be.

If you want to build something real, you need a partner who wants to help you succeed. Cardiff could be that partner. Apply today at cardiff.co/tucker. Cardiff2fs.co/tucker real growth, fast-funded, Cardiff, borrow better. So Ben Jordan has thought a lot about this nose a lot about it, knows a lot of the details

about where the data from these cameras are going, which is worth knowing, and he joins us. Yeah, I'm here, I'm great, thank you for the work that you've done on this.

We're told that, look, it's for your safety, and unless you want to be a terrorist, you should probably shut up about it. And there's nothing to be worried about at all, if you're not doing something wrong.

“So, I'm not doing anything wrong, why should I be worried about it?”

Yeah, I mean, there's a lot of reasons to be worried about it. One pushback I always get is people saying I have nothing to hide, and I feel like that is one of the most inaccurate statements ever. Well, when somebody says that to me, I always ask them to hand me their phone, and I'm lock it, and I'm going to do the other room for a while, and just, you know, why do you have

something to legal on there? Let me look at it. But yeah, anybody who's ever been stalked, who's been falsely accused of a crime, anybody who's ever been hacked, who's had their identity stolen, they all have stuff to hide, and it's when those terrible things happen to you when you realize, oh, I actually have

a lot to hide, and this is really important.

As far as the first thing that I always, when I talk to a police chief or something like

that, the first thing I always tell them, is that this is a third-party tech startup. They're not even a public company. It's a private company that has venture capital investors, but one of which is on the hook for Cambridge Analytica, by the way, and they have one job, and that job is to make as much money as possible.

“So they're going to tell you whatever it is that you need to hear to put as many cameras”

in your community as possible. They're going to tell you that it helps solve crime, that it will increase your clearance rates, and the fact is that they don't have any evidence of doing any of that. So the crime thing, it does seem like we tried to find the numbers, crime stats are complicated, cross-referencing them with what we know about these cameras and where they are.

It didn't seem like they, well, they certainly had an eliminated crime in like Oakland or Houston or places that have a real problem with crime, but it seems intuitive that, like if you spy in everyone all the time, there will be less crime, like that doesn't seem like a crazy claim. Yeah, well, I mean, criminology and sociology are incredibly chaotic.

We actually, as a society, don't even know if increasing police reduces crime, right? That can go either way, depending on what city is. One of my favorite studies was actually a dog ownership, like does having a security dog or having a lot of dogs on any neighborhood reduced crime? And it actually did, and the reason was, because people walk their dogs, and they walk

around and they get to know their neighbors, and they might even get to know their police more, you know, if they have police, but I'm foot walking around the neighborhood, and that

“makes everybody safer, but the only thing that we truly know that lowers crime is community”

policing, is people trusting their police officers, and saying, hey, there's a gang member that all of a sudden bought a gun. I think something's going to go down, I saw this, they'll have that conversation with their police department, and then they could actually reduce crime and prevent victims from happening.

So it's not a matter of getting somebody's license plate and then arresting them down

the road, you don't have a victim in the first place, and I feel in most of the communities

that I've visited, and I'm literally on the road right now, visiting communities talking to city council members and stuff like that. In most of these communities, the public feels like the license plate readers, specifically from flock, are betraying the relationship that they have with police. They're actually violating that social contract, where people expect privacy and then not being given.

Well, I mean, if surveillance created safety, then prisons would be very safe, but they're very dangerous. Yes, I guess that's obvious, right? Now that I think about it, one thing that a lot of people also don't think about, one of my favorite analogies, and this is used by the ACLU often, is if you're driving somewhere

in a cop holes behind you at a stoplight, you immediately change the way you behave. You start, you know, you might be really into a song you're listening to, now you're distracted by the cop. You might be in a conversation. For some reason, the flow of that conversation changes, even if you've done nothing wrong. We all just have that weird feeling where this person who is able to, I don't know, handcuff us, pull us over, write us a ticket, shoot

us, whatever they want to do. When that person's behind us and surveilling us, and we're looking in and saying, "Uh, what's that guy up to? Is he up to no good?" We start behaving differently. And so when you put cameras in front of playgrounds, and there's plenty of flock cameras in front of playgrounds, which is baffling to me. Nobody's saying, "Hey, doesn't this affect

the way kids play?" Like, when I learned how to do a cartwheel the first time when I was

a kid or when I learned how to play the guitar, I didn't have anybody watching me. I had to be alone to do that. I needed my privacy to be able to find my own identity and find what I'm so good at, which is a cartwheel's battle. But really, no, I think that's such a wise point in a deep point. So to what extent did communities have a say in this?

Barely, I mean, most people, to the, up until we started releasing big videos on this and that started going in the news, most people didn't even know what the cameras were. They

days. So every single, so as if, in my neighborhood, for example, in Atlanta, it's as if

“I had a GPS unit on my car. I can't go to Chick-fil-A or a grocery store or do anything”

without the police knowing about it, despite having not, I'm not suspected of committing any crime. So, I mean, shouldn't there be, like, a period where the town, the city of Atlanta in your case, says to the public, you know, we're going to put North Korea style surveillance posts all around the city, like, are you for this? You're against it? Like, here's the

trade-off that we're thinking about. What do you think? There was no democratic input that you're aware of. No, it's very, and most people, I've been out of pocket, I've been paying for polling to find out, you know, how many people are for this, how many people are against this, and overwhelmingly Americans are against it, and one thing that I find interesting is, you're

seeing a lot of people on both sides of the political aisle be against it at the same time, which it's like the only issue in America right now where everybody's kind of getting

“along and being like, "Yeah, we don't want that, we hate it." And I think that's really”

important because, as you had just shown, as you had just shown that video with the Garrett Laneway interview, he's very quick to say the word antifa. He, after some of my videos came out, he emailed police chiefs around the country, his client, from his personally mail address, telling them that they were under attack by lawless activists who want

to defund the police. And, you know, I'm like, I've never wanted to defund the police. I, you

know, that's never been the stance of mine. And just the other day, he didn't interview saying that people like Flock, they don't hate Flock, they hate the Trump administration. Like he literally said this in an interview, and he just seems to be trying so hard to act like conservatives are aligned with him, and that it's the left that's against it. But I'm trying to make it very clear that one of the reasons I'm here right now, conservatives

are not aligned with him. Conservatives have classically always been anti surveillance. Oh, first. Starting at Orwell, who was famously a socialist, and sometimes identified as a communist, but whose views are like beloved by every conservative I know. So it's like, I don't even know what those terms of mean. If you're for America, if you're for human dignity, if you're for privacy, you will pose this. And that partisan crap is not applicable

on questions like this. These are human rights. They're not political rights. So I have to

“assume that kid, Garrett, whatever his name is, was just put my, I think it's actually”

three, 12-year-olds dressed. I'm top of one another in the whole human costume. So good. That's so exactly what's going on. That is so good. Okay, exactly. I hate to be mean to this one kid, but it's like, what's his, I mean, he's getting rich from this, from tax dollars, by the way. And then lecturing the people who are being abused by it, there's something about that combination of the inferiority. But he said, well, you know, there's

the ACLU. Now, is someone who grew up in hiring sincerely admiring the ACLU. I wish the ACLU were leading the fight on this, but you don't work for the ACLU, do you? Who do you work for? No. But I am, I am, I just met with the ACLU yesterday with somebody from the ACLU. They, they're a little bit less public on this, but they are supporting people who are filing suits. They are involved in it, but much less publicly, which is

part of the reason I was having a meeting with them is because they're like, hey, you're kind of the face of this right now. Do you want to maybe, we'll give you some resources to help. And so, yeah, the ACLU, the EFF, the Electronic Frontiers' Foundation, they've also been, they actually, the person who made deflock, this name's Will, Fox sent him a season to assist, and they stepped in and said, we have a legal team, we'll check this out,

and, you know, talk, flocked to pound sand. So, they've been very helpful in that regard.

Home ownership has always been at the center of the American dream. It is an actual asset

in place. People work their entire lives to build, place of stability and security and real value. Right now, though, too many homeowners are stuck, swiping credit cards to cover groceries. There's basically a survival tax of 20% interest or more, so why keep handing your money to the banks when you could keep it for your family, interest is what kills you. Our friends at American financing have a better way. They're helping homeowners use their

hard earned equity and their supporting Americans looking to fulfill the dream of owning a home with mortgage rates currently in the fives. American financing saves its customers in the average of $800 a month, that's about 10 grand a year. It's not just alone, it's a true financial reset. We recommend American financing. They're called America's home for home loans for a reason. So, get out of credit card debt. I mean, it is just

If you want out, call 800-685-5696-8685-5696, or visit Americanfinancing.net/tucker.

“So, where do the images in the sounds go? Where does the data go?”

Typically, what happens with your standard block camera, like the black ones that you see, they're called the falcons, that's the model name of them. They will see a license plate, they'll take a picture, and then they'll send it to the flock servers where the police can access it. Whenever the police, let's say you had a brown car with a bumper sticker and maybe a broken window. The AI actually picks that up, and so not only your license plate,

the police can just search brown, car, brown, car, broken window, and then they'll be able to find every single time that you've passed a camera. But it gets worse than that, because

they have something called a hot list, where they could put your license plate on a hot list,

and then every single time that you pass a license plate, the police get a notification saying this person is here, if this person's here, this person's here, and they don't need a warrant to do this, which is the most staggering part, because it's just, this is no different than putting a GPS on somebody's car functionally if you have a lot of flock cameras around. And pinning somebody beyond one cell phone tower, the Supreme Court had not that long ago

actually decided that that was on constitutional. So I just don't see how this is. What's the status of the drones? Flock is saying publicly, you know, we have a drone fleet, we're expanding our drone fleet. How big is that fleet? Do you know, and that does seem

to change the calculation? I had just done an interview next to, not on the property, but next

to the property of their secret drone facility, which has a construction company name on it. It doesn't have the Flock safety name. And they called the police and had me detained. We're doing an interview across the street for it. They have a drone facility, their idea is to have drones that are persistently in the air. That's what some Flock employees have told me as of like a year ago. They do have something called emergency responder drones.

That I don't really have a huge problem with. Like if my house is on fire, I kind of want to drone to fly by really fast and let the fire department know how many trucks to send, but what they're doing is a lot different than that. They want drones that are persistently in the air, and then you know, when it runs out of batteries, you want to go down, want to go back up, and it'll be able to surveil every single person under us.

You're describing a war zone. I mean, there are a couple hot war zones in the world, right, several, and there are permanently drones in the air. So why would our government be using we're not in any combatants for Americans? Why would they be treating us like we're the enemy?

“I mean, so the true, I want to joke and say because it makes us safer, but I think the truth is”

is that all Flock has spent hundreds of millions, billions of dollars. They're product and marketing, but their marketing has been towards police, and they have studies that they wrote themselves, that they point to saying, "Look how good this is for it. Look how much safer this makes your community, how much better makes your job. They have conventions where they invite the police officers and give them freebies." And then there's also a really large revolving door

effect, where if you even go down the LinkedIn, go down like Flock employees, you'll find, you know, the head of communications happen to be a police officer in Dallas a year before, and he happened to be the person in the police department who signed the surveillance contracts or recommended the surveillance contract, same thing with city hall members, things like that. And so you have something that really, I mean, I call it corruption. I don't know if it's legally corruption, but revolving

door, revolving door between government and private industry to me, sound a lot like corruption.

“So I think that's why you have this massive expansion, and that's why you have police saying,”

"We need this otherwise we can't do our job," and city council members saying, "Okay, well, we're going to have a quick little meeting and then vote this in before anybody hears about it." But in the end, everything that you're talking about, the things that you're scared of, absolutely could happen. Like, I think back to COVID, just five, six years ago, imagine Flock cameras, you leave the house to go pick up food during quarantine or something in Flock cameras are

now, you know, you could be arrested for violating quarantine or get a ticket or facial recognition cameras or the cameras that they have in retail stores, sending you a ticket, because you didn't wear your mask properly, because you know it's sticking out the top like, I think that these affect people across the board from every political aisle, and I think it's really important that people speak to their city council members and their local politicians now, and let them know how

what I'm doing is I'm trying to take down the politicians who sign the contract to enable this,

“because that's literally what I'm doing. I'm interviewing politicians, local level,”

to find out who's running against the person who threw their community under the bus by signing this contract. I mean, it's very easy to see how military technology and this is military technologies, these weapons were, could be used as tools to political repression. Let's say the war in Iran continues. This is not a partisan point. It's just an obvious observation. The work continues, the straight remains closed, we drain the SPR, and we have an actual energy crisis at

that point, like an actual one. And the government says, well, we're, we're instituting a work from home order. You know, we did that during COVID, we're doing it now. And a lot of people,

like me, would be like, buzz off. I'm going where I want to go. And then drones are deployed

to make certain that the sheep are being herded correctly. Like, that's not a crazy scenario at all. No, no, and I mean, it's one of the most outrageous things that that we've discovered,

“a friend of mine, Jason Hunier, he lives in Atlanta, suburb, Dunwoody. He has been just volunteering”

his time. He's not a professional investigator. He's not a journalist. He's been volunteering his time pulling audit reports through FOIA requests of what these things have been used for, where they're located, what they've been searching. And there's a place that are called Marcus Jewish Community Center. It's a private large community center that's kind of beloved by the community. And they have cameras on the wall there that aren't flop cameras. They're like the standard cameras you

would have in any sort of business. And the community center said, okay, well, we're a little worry that there might be some sort of anti-Semitic attacks. So we want to share our footage with police in case they need it. In case there's a shooting or something terrible happens. And by doing that, they shared it with FOIA. So what Jason had discovered is that over a thousand times, FOIA employees viewed those cameras inside this private community center, including but not limited

to the pool, the daycare center, the children's gymnastics room. And nobody had been arrested. Nobody had to answer any questions about it. They, in fact, they actually made it harder for FOIA to collect an audit or to collect a record of who was looking at the camera internally from the company. We just to be clear, it was FOIA employees who were not licensed law enforcement officers. All grown men. Yes. Yes. All FOIA employees over a thousand times, and they were all grown men.

And they were looking at these cameras at the daycare center, the children's gymnastics room, like and their defense to this was that it was a product demo for another client. And I'm thinking to myself, if I had a business and I wanted a flock camera by the police department and somebody pulled up a laptop and said, "What kind of good this works?" And then it was a children's gymnastics room. I would call the police, or hit them. I'm not sure what I would do, but that's an outrageous

explanation that's just delusional. How many flock employees were fired after that? None. Not one. They, they took down their LinkedIn, though, and deleted their, one of them was in a band, and removed his band a page on Facebook. So yeah, they pretty much got scrubbed from social media, because I released a video about it on Instagram, and it made the news a little bit. And so they immediately just scrubbed their profiles. What is Congress done?

So I had found some flock law enforcement, and flock law enforcement accounts on the dark web from a Russian vendor, and it didn't have multifactor authentication. You know, when you sign

“into Netflix, and then you have to like say, "Yes, I signed in from Netflix on my phone," or type”

in a code, they didn't have that. And not all flock gamers have that, or not all flock accounts have that. And I found it for sale on a Russian vendor, and so I actually started talking to some senators representative Christian Amardi and Senator Widen from Oregon. They wrote a letter to the FTC saying, "Hey, these need to be investigated immediately. There's a massive national security risk here. And FTC, I soon printed it out in the garbage. I'm not sure what they did, but they certainly

didn't open in investigation." And this was almost a year ago.

Well, there's never been a better time to sign up for Dutch Pat. That's because we have news

in the world of dogs, which we follow closely. The return of new world screwworm has shelters debating whether they should euthanize kill thousands of cats and dogs. The new world screwworm is a parasitic fly that feeds on warm-blooded animals and public health authorities are searching for ways to contain the disease as it spreads. One of the stories made takeaways is that now is a good time to bring your dog to the vet, but a lot of people can't, because vet bills are totally

out of control, because private equity is buying up all the local veterinarians. Prices have doubled. We didn't hold podcasts on this. Dutch is the solution. License veterinarians tell

bucks. Visit Dutch.com/tuckerdesignup. The good news is that he Dutch vet can prescribe free and tick medication that can also prevent life-threatening new world screwworm. Again, that's a 10-minute call, no-waiting room, no clinic mark-up, free shipping on products, not on by private equity, up to 5 pets, 82 bucks a year. Visit Dutch.com/tucker, use the code Tucker for up to $50 off. That's DutchDUTCH.com/tucker. Are there any laws governing what flock or in

flock is not? Of course, the only surveillance company out there, there are a lot. But are there laws

“governing what they can do with the data, with your data pictures of you and your family?”

In Illinois, maybe in California, there's some states that are starting to try and mimic data privacy laws that they have in the EU or any other country, really, like the data privacy

laws that are superior to ours. The problem is that if it's only in one state, then they could

just send it to a server and another state and then sell the data elsewhere. Fox claims to not sell your data, but I've literally seen PDF price sheets with an amount on how much they sell data for. So make sense of that. So you think they're lying about not selling data? It's almost as if they have a financial interest in lying to the public to get their company to IPO is quickly as possible. I was cynical, cynical. I don't think T-shirt guy would do that, um, and last

moment, I'll have you a question. Why are you doing this? Why are you devoting so much time to this? I'm going to be honest with you. I hate it. I'm so tired. I'm so tired of it all. But it's been the last year. I mean, we've discovered massive security vulnerabilities and reported on them. But the reason I'm doing it is because it's making a difference. You're seeing communities across the country and some big cities, canceling their file contract or refusing to renew them.

And I think that everybody needs to be concerned about this. And I feel like there's very few people in America who want to be tracked everywhere they go. And now is the time when we need to

“let your local city council, mayor, county, whatever it is. Senators, governors, you need to make”

a big stink about it and let them know that they're not going to be running for office anymore

if they continue to allow this to happen. You actually are making a difference. That's the amazing thing.

You know, everyone wants to make a difference. I think you're actually succeeding. So thank you. Thank you for taking the time. It's wild to imagine that there's a peaceful thing. It's so great. It's so affirming. Thank you very much for doing this. Thank you. Have a wonderful day. Thank you. So it's a year's stories like that. You got to wonder who would participate in this. A lot of good people or cops for sure. Many more than they tell you. On the other hand,

police departments across the country are participating in the dehumanizing of entire populations by stealing their privacy. Can't go anywhere without being watched. So you're not actually a citizen anymore. You are to some real extent enslaved by the government. So most people involved in this process, gathering the information, forcing the laws, probably don't think about it too much. But some of them aren't stupid and probably reflective.

“And they probably have thought of it. And yet they still work there. And what's that?”

So it's interesting that there have been people who refused to participate in them. And one of them is a former police officer from Rhode Island, a decorated police officer called Noel Pichardo, who said, "Well, I'm actually not going to do this because it's wrong." And you hear that so seldom anywhere for any reason. People voluntarily giving up a good job because they think it's immoral that we thought it'd be worth talking to him. And he joins us now.

Well, thanks very much for doing this. Hey, it's a guy who's doing things for having me. So can you just tell us your story? So you're a cop in Rhode Island, correct? Oh, no, I was. Yeah, yeah, I'm sorry, figure speech. You were at one point a police officer in Rhode Island. And you no longer are. So what happened and why?

So back in 2021, my department was the Petalka Police Department over here and a lot of other police departments across the state. They started doing these trial periods with the flock. So they were introducing to our police chiefs, our city councils and say, hey, we have this new technology. It's going to help you solve crimes, crash criminals. And I was trained on it along with my other co-workers. And even the captain at the time who's tasked with training us, he was

already very uncomfortable with it. He said, look, I was tasked with training you guys on a users, but I don't know. This seems a little sketchy, but this is how it works. This is how you get it on your computer. This is how the system works. This is how you find a vehicle on hotlist. And there you go.

So when we first went introduced to training, I was already uncomfortable with it. And then when I

finally had it in my vehicle, when I saw how it worked and how it basically tracked vehicles on

now that it's a fourth amendment violation, including the ACLU and the Institute for Justice who

“agree on that. And thankfully, my city was too poor to afford that at the time. So they shook it down.”

So that when I got involved, and I got in trouble was back in 2023, I'm driving in my district, and I see them up in my community. And I'm a patrolman. And I wasn't notified that we were getting these cameras. So if I'm a police officer and it's my business to know, when things like these are introduced in my department, the public doesn't know. And that was the case. The public wasn't notified. The other cities in Rhode Island were not notified. Ben was saying to most cities across the country,

they were not notified. It was just something that flock had a conversation with the city council, the police chief, and they were put up without not finding the public. And so, you know,

after a couple months of having a hard time looking my wife in the eye, I spoke with a local reporter,

I spoke with the Valley Breeze, and I told them this is what's going on. This was put up without the public's knowledge and needs to be addressed. He asked if he could use my name. And because I'm an idealist and a bit romantic and a bit stupid, I guess. I told him to give him my name, because I knew people will hopefully would pay attention to that they knew a police officer felt disstrongly about what was happening. And so, once he did the article back in October,

2023, I got in a lot of trouble. I spoke with a lot of my local representatives to try to let them know that I got me in trouble. One of our representatives was a really good guy. His name is Joe Solomon. He invited to speak at the government oversight committee in April 2024. That got me in trouble.

So, because I was doing all this, I got suspended a total of four times. 72 days without pace,

I lost about $20,000 worth of pay because of all those suspensions. I was supposed to get promoted to detective. I got that denied twice. I was banned from taking the sergeant exam. Every time I was suspended, they would do things like having me hand in all my gear and all my equipment, which is not a thing that we do anymore. That's kind of an old custom. The only time they have a police officer when he's suspended hand in their gear is when they're arrested for a crime. And I wasn't a charge with any

crime. I was just being suspended for, well, they will lie and says, no, we're actually suspended because you missed the municipal court day. Or we're suspending you because you didn't take this report on a road rage incident. We don't take road rage incident reports. And so I get that's a lot.

“So, they would say that's why this is suspended me, but everyone in my department, all my”

coworkers knew that they were suspending me because of my opinion. And because I was trying to address the problem as best as I can. So, eventually, what happened was in July of 2025. So, last year, they wanted to terminate me. And it was based, one of them was literally based on a lie, one of the reasons why they wanted to terminate me. So, I wanted to challenge in Leobore, which is like our version of a trial when you go to Leobore, I said, no, this is wrong. I'm fighting for my job.

It was going to cost me $30,000. My union was only going to pay 10. So, I needed to come up with 20 granted to defend myself. I couldn't afford that. So, I had to resign. It was in my choice. I couldn't afford it. And so, since my resignation, you know, I decided, you know what? I gave it my best shot. I tried to adjust his palm best, like, maybe I'm not articulate, maybe I'm not diplomatic enough. I don't know, maybe someone like then should be dealing with this instead of me. So, I decided to

let it go. So, as you know, I'm a let it go. I'm going to try to get hired somewhere else, maybe I can get a job working campus security somewhere. I couldn't even get that because they wanted to me the sign. And it was probably because they wanted me sign an NDA before I left, which I was even though the thing you can do with police departments. But they wanted me to sign an NDA and I refused. And the deal was, if you sign this NDA, that bars you from saying anything about your experience here,

but in return, we'll keep you on our health insurance. You'll stay on the city health insurance until you find another job. And the chief will promise not to say anything about you when you're looking for another job. I thought about that. It's not a bad deal. But I decided not to do that. I didn't

“sign the NDA. And that's why I haven't been able to find a job in my field. And definitely now that”

I'm doing this interview, I won't be able to find a job in the entire country. That's, but even no offense, I'm going to use to live it around. So, I can say this. Even by Rhode Island standards, that is very corrupt. I mean, you just get corruption. That's ridiculous. And your behavior was in my view heroic. So, thank you. Eating rights pretty important. But it's hard if you live here about half of the American diet is ultra processed foods. And that hurts you. Fake food harms your

body, your mind, and especially your liver. So, people think that feeling sluggish and foggy and bloated is just what it is to be older. But that's not true. Eating crap makes you feel that way. Well, our friends at Does have a solution. It's called Does for your liver. This doctor approved plant-based liver supplement is clinically proven to promote liver function and lower

need to do is take a daily two-ounce shot, taste like orange juice, an easy shot of liquid. It's not the

vacts. People we know use Does for your liver and they have seen rapid results in their blood work and they feel much, much better. The difference is very obvious. Lots of brands claim to support liver health, but do so before their products have gone through testing. This has been tested. Everything checks all the boxes. Visit DoesDaily.co/tucker. Use the code Tucker for 35% off. That's DoesDaily.co/tucker code Tucker 35% off. You're going to love it.

But I appreciate it. I've got a lot of questions, but the main one is why was the puttucket, which used to be a pretty tough town. Is I remember it? It's still a tough town. Yeah,

“that's a tough town. Big project there. Yeah. Tough. Why were they so wedded to these cameras?”

Why was it so important for them to have these cameras? I actually don't know. I asked to speak with my chief because she, you know, she dehumanized me, so I was, you know, maybe if she speaks and because the only time I had a conversation with my chief is when I got hired eight years ago.

I had never spoken to her since I got hired. So she's putting all these punishments on me and

like, you know, maybe maybe I could have gone about this in the better way. Maybe, you know, maybe if I had a conversation with her first before I spoke with the reporter before I spoke with the government, oversight committee, maybe it would have made this, you know, it would have made this back and forth a little more cordial. So I asked to speak with her and she refused to speak with me or they told me that it's not even a bother. So I don't even know if they asked or not.

But so I don't know. I mean, I asked some of the city council members and put tuck it. I was like,

“look, don't you think it's a bit of a problem that the public has been notified about this?”

Like, that doesn't concern you. And, you know, their response was the same response that Jordan

was saying, it was like, well, it's for their safety. So what's the problem? So I don't know.

I don't, you know, looking, you know, that we're dealing with a battle of extremes and our country or not is like you mentioned in your monologue, you know, there's the fun police thing going on three years ago. And now there's this another extreme of mass surveillance. So which one is it? And I think that's where we're going to battle of extremes, you know, as they say hurt people hurt people, you know, you know, we put body cams on our officers and when I had a body and look,

whatever you think about body cams, it is a bit dehumanizing to have a video camera put on your chest. I best say go do your job. It's a bit dehumanizing. So it's not surprising to me that now in the police or the city now have the opportunity to return the favorites of the public. That did not going to make much about it. Yeah, like you put body cams on us, because we're

“going back because of some guys did something in Minnesota. Well, now it's your turn. So I think”

this is a Freudian thing going on there where you do it to us. Now we do it to you. So, you know, and to defend my co-workers, you know, it's a mix. Some of them think this is wrong. This is a moral. Some of them think it's a good idea. And some of them just don't care. They just want to finish their job and go home and get their attention. Like, you know, what I'll get in shot. So it's not a, it's not a monolith, you know, you know, I want it. If there's one thing I can add

to this that's useful other than trying to warn people as best I can. It's not people to be too angry with their local police officers. Like, they're getting a bombarded with things all the time. You know, some of them are a union fights right now where some of their health insurance is are being threatened. So I don't think it's crazy. I don't think every police officer who feels the way I should I, the way I feel should be as idealistic as me. Maybe they should. I don't

know how to, I mean, if people want to be courageous, they instead of expecting it from others, they should just do with themselves. Yeah. But only a small percentage of people are willing to do that. I've noticed like a tiny percentage. So, did it make puttuck it as safe as little Compton, for example. Oh, you've been a little confident. You've been around, Becca. Oh, yeah. Oh, I mean, yeah, I know Rhode Island very well. But no, but what I'm saying is puttuck it as you just said,

it's like it kind of famous is nice town, but there's some definitely very rough parts of it. Are they now totally safe with these cameras? Oh, no, nothing changed. Um, not changed. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. The thing is to, um, you know, it's like Ben you and Ben were talking about. If you treat people like prisoners, they act like that. Right. You know, if people is like you said a prisoner should be ideally safe because of all the surveillance, but it's not the

most dangerous place in the world. Yes. So, and criminals who criminals no matter what you do, no matter what you input, they're going to break the law. You know, they're going to try to find away around it. Like things like this, they only hurt the law biting citizen. You know, criminals will find out a way to try to get around it. You know, instead of driving one car through all these cameras, you know, maybe we're going to do stop points and switch cars. Like, sophisticated criminals

law biting sensors are not, you know, they're, you know, they're going to be tracked everywhere. They're, they go. And this is what it is. It's kind of a geo fence for vehicles. It tracks vehicles everywhere that they go. And I've heard some really juvenile arguments with they say, well, we're not tracking people, we're just tracking cars. And I'm trying to figure out how that's any different. Sounds the same to me, especially in the place like, you know, Rhode Island or Minnesota,

where every, everywhere except in New York, every state doesn't really have a proper subway system.

“So, if you need to get around and every state in America, you need a motor vehicle, you need a”

car in order to get around. Yes. So, if you're tracking people's cars, you're tracking people, you know, so that's a really stupid argument that was trying to be argue that. And like I said, I don't know how that's any better. We're not tracking people, we're tracking cars. Like, okay. Well, especially if they haven't done anything wrong. So, it's sweeping up everybody into this drag net. It seems like by definition, unconstitutional. I mean, I don't want to, I'm not

alleging any specific crime because I've no knowledge of a specific crime, but given everything you've said is it possible that members of the city council or law enforcement officials are making money on this? Yeah, I don't know. I mean, the reaction to me made me very suspicious of it because the smart, yeah, it was very suspicious because I was the only officer in my state and at the country at the time that was, you know, publicly given my objections. So, the smart thing to do was just

be ignored me and say, you know, he's just some crazy guy in the wilderness eating folks in hunting here. Exactly. Exactly. Exactly. They beheaded John the Baptist. I mean, didn't work for him. Yeah. So, I thought, you know, because, you know, the chief, she's pretty smart. I thought what she was going to do was to ignore me. Yes. I thought that was what she was going to do. I thought she was going to punish me once, suspend me once, you know, and I take that hand. I just move on with my life,

you know, I tried, you know, but when I was getting, it was, it was in the two-year period, I was getting suspended and it, within two years. It was in the two-year period. I was dealing with all that. So, I did guess a specialist of what's happening behind the scenes that I mean, you know, I may or may not know why they're trying so hard to get rid of me. You know, I just thought maybe it was just a tribal impulse that was kicking in, you know,

but, you know, now that Ben is sharing, where Ben is sharing this the first time I'm hearing it,

that there are some backdoor ideas that look like that happened. Maybe, I don't know. I mean, it is Rhode Island, so I don't know. What was the reaction from your wife and your family,

“people you know, your neighbors, were they on your side?”

So, my wife was on my side. Good. My wife was on my side. She supported me from the beginning. She was worried. I mean, this was a sad thing. Everyone, when I was telling my family and all my friends, and in my co-workers, who really care about me, and I still care about them very much, they all told me. They all read the same script. They pulled me inside and they said, "Well, if you, if you go this route, and you talk about this, they're going to make sure that you lose your job,

and they're probably going to make sure that you don't work again." They all told me this. My family told me this. My co-workers told me this. They all said the same script. So, it was really sad that as Americans, we've accepted this idea that if you speak up, you're just going to get hammered. Exactly. That was really sad that everyone just accepted that. But so, no one really spoke against what I was doing, they were, their argument was, what you're doing is noble, but you know,

leave that for some of the idiot to do. You have two kids. You have a wife. You have bills to pay. Let's somebody else put the neck on the line. That was the advice that everyone was trying to give me. And I thought about it. And like I said, I know after a couple months, I had trouble sleeping.

My first son was born, right before I spoke up. And then when you become a father,

I'm sure you understand this talk, you're like, you're like, oh man, like, I'm responsible for this person becomes. That's right. So, you know, one day, I'm going to have to have a conversation with my sons about integrity. And when I have that conversation with them, I want to be able to look into the eye, I want to have that conversation. So, I knew if I ignored this problem and I pretended that it didn't exist. You know, I wouldn't be able to do that. So, I thought it was worth the risk.

I paid the price for it, but I'm doing all right. So, you may be emotional saying that. Well, I, for whatever it's worth nothing really, but I just want to say it, I hope you are

“richly rewarded for your courage and decency. And I think you did that for everybody in this”

country. And I'm just, I'm really grateful you did it. And, and last thing, you were very articulate. So, that was not your problem. It was done. It's, it's my Rhode Island accent. It's disgusting.

So, anyway, if anybody who's never been Rhode Island don't worry, we don't all talk like there's

just blue collar, just blue collar, latinos, black guys, and the tallyans, we're the only ones who talk like this. It's the best. I miss it. No, well, thank you for taking the time. It's great to talk to you.