Sen. John Fetterman on the Democratic Divide

I don't know how these things are going to do, but when I do, you should replace me with indeed.

“You should call indeed when you're replacing me because that, listen, this podcast requires skills.”

You need a face. You need a pie hole so that you can open your pie hole and just spout. That's not everybody can do that. And so, you know, if you need to hire, you got to say to yourself, this is a job for indeed sponsored jobs. You can reach candidates that meet your specific criteria.

Like if you want them to have skills or pie hole, certifications, maybe even you want to know what the location is. Only indeed can get that stuff done efficiently. Trust me, you know. You got to, you got to kiss a lot of frogs unless you use one of these services they're like indeed. So spend less time searching and more time actually interviewing candidates who check all your boxes.

Less stress, less time, more results. When you need the right person to cut through the chaos, this is a job for indeed sponsored jobs. And listeners of this show, we've got a $75 sponsored job credit to help get your job.

“The premium status it deserves at indeed dot com slash podcast.”

Just go to indeed dot com slash podcast right now. And support our show by saying you heard about indeed on this podcast. Indeed dot com slash podcast terms and conditions apply.

Folks, you know, I am nothing if not a generator of ideas that may never work.

Obviously we've talked a little bit on the show about the crumple, which is the portable dogbed that you throw on the ground that makes it different. Topographical shape each time you do it or maybe I'll make an app. Maybe I'm always thinking of different apps or maybe I'll make an app that helps people. Create and run their great business ideas. Oh, wait, I don't need to do that because it's already existing.

Shopify. Somebody price that around having a Shopify idea about an app that would help people bring their ideas to fruition like the crumple. And then they made that and the damp things brilliant. It makes the whole process easy. Everything you need.

It's easy to design your shop. It's easy to get paid. They handle the checkout process.

“You might think to yourself, like, oh, how are they going to complete their purchase?”

The Shopify handles it. Get some to come back as repeat customers. Set up and check out our all handled that you get to live your life. Grow your business, which they help you do too. I'm perfectly happy with them that they stole my idea.

Even though obviously they had it first and did the work you needed to do to make it come to fruition.

So get Shopify for God 6. With Shopify, nothing stands between your idea and a real business. So go make it one. Start your free trial at Shopify.com/tws. Start your free trial at Shopify.com/tws.

[music] Hello, everybody. Welcome to the weekly show podcast on this summer day. August 4th Tuesday, primary day. Election day. Here you hear you. I voted.

Sticker. That was my one-man show called primary day. Which happens in August, which, as you know, is great for turn up. We don't know actually what happened in those were taping this podcast before the results are in. So by the time you hear it, you will know the results of all the hot primaries in Michigan and everywhere else.

And it'll look like we don't. And that we're ignoring it. But we're not ignoring it. People I'm not a time traveler. But we are going to be talking to somebody who very strong opinions about what should happen in this very primary season.

And he doesn't know the results of it either. So we're going to be talking about elections and the results of elections. And what those elections might mean for people all while ignoring the results of set elections, which might make us seem crazy. But there's probably so much more in this conversation that's going to make it seem crazy. So let's just get to it.

[music] So ladies and gentlemen, we'll get right to it. We have with us today, a senator, United States Senator, President Great State, Pennsylvania, go fight in Quakers. Ladies and gentlemen, Senator John Federman.

Sir, first of all, where's Senator Federman?

All I see is a guy wearing a suit and tie. So yeah, this is not AI. It's not AI.

Yeah, well, I mean, but it just, I thought, way, I'm already in it.

So maybe I could just be a treat for everybody. I feel terrible now. I thought, well, I'm sorry. If you dress under dress in honor, you might end up business casual. Yeah.

So how are things going down there? Do you like being a senator? Is that something that is at an enjoyable job?

“Or is it just, you sit around just fighting with everybody?”

What's the vibe down there? Well, I mean, it's kind of a mixed thing. I mean, it's, it's obviously an honor to be one of Pennsylvania's voiceier in the United States Senate. And it's also some of it's professional wrestling, not really kind of important stuff. But some of it's very important as well, too.

And that's really why people I assume get into this to be part of that conversation. So overall. But I think I've said this, people would be surprised. It's not exactly really glamorous. And now, like, for me, I have a 300 square apartment here in D.C.

Back there. And it's not, like, that's not a lot of snappy, you know, West Wing kind of dialogue back and forth thing. A lot of it's more kind of like, kind of a thing. But, but sometimes it is really important thing that will impact a lot of millions and millions of American.

“Are you guys going to have your, your recess in August, or is that?”

Are they part of, I know, they keeping you there. Last night there was an overwhelming, like, overwhelming, by part is in procedural vote. Last night for a continuing resolution. And I think it was 89/4. And now, so overall that's--

Can I guess the four? Yeah, no shut down. No shut down. Yeah, Rand Paul. Yeah, well, of course.

He, he spoke no fun. He, he would be like, she's burner and he would vote that shit down. I mean, but yeah. And then I think it was Warren. And then I think Sanders.

But overall, some people didn't go there because it was a travel day. But that's a strong statement saying that we want to avoid another shutdown. And I'm related to know that without a doubt. I mean, we've been through the two longest shutdowns of all American history.

And that may be at some time put me at odds with my party because it's always a bad thing.

The shutter government down. And it shuts down parts of critical over our country. And it also punishes a lot of these workers. Now, everyone here in the, in Congress are paid. But the people that aren't are like the people on the front line, like a TSA, and doing those things.

So overall, we have to find a better way to figure out things without shutting our down in kind of a tantrum. How, how at odds are you with the party? You know, you said it sometimes puts yet odds. You clearly, you're the guy everybody points to now as you're in the, I guess, mansion or cinema role. The, the kind of contrarian.

So, so what's your relationship now with the? Yeah, thanks for bringing that up. I mean, there's, it's really, it's not, it's, it's not that, that at all.

“I mean, I mean, I deeply respect them as well, too, but I'm, I'm not that, I think that's, it's like an easy take to assume that.”

And that's just not me. If, if you look at my voting record, I'm in 90, some percent voting the Democrat line. And now, how I differ, how I differ is. And that's become much more and more pronounced israel. You know, after 10, 7, the Gaza war, and is that nobody really saw how things would continue.

We wouldn't be part of it. Now, here we have at the Iranian war now. And then in smaller, other kinds of way, shutting our government down, countless kinds of vote to shut our government down. I would vote with the Republican side, not because I'm a Republican, but just be, the Democratic party.

We used to always be the party that says we must never shut our government down.

That was part of what the Democratic party really was. And I represent, I represent Pennsylvania, really, the most purple state really in the country. And now, I don't represent just Democrats. I represent all people here in Pennsylvania. So these views are firmly rooted in basic kinds of democratic values.

But after the Trump reelection, that just kind of flipped some things on its head. And you, do you attribute that to, you know, what they call Trump derangement syndrome? Do you believe that the Democratic party in those instances is suffering? I agree. It is a real thing.

It is a real thing. And that makes it more difficult to try to call balls and strike.

I'm aware that if I happen to disagree with like the party line, you know, there's a price to pay.

“But I think it's more important to be, hey, I honestly think this is, this is the right take.”

And I think what's appropriate. And now, I mean, there's a lot of stories of how I've become, you know, increased me more unpopular with, with Democrats in my state. And I'm aware of it, but these were all very specific choices because I think, you know, this is the, the correct take. And now I would rather have people know what I happen to believe because, again, they are, they're rooted in very democratic kinds of values.

Well, let me, let me sort of, so let's, let's tease that out a little bit because I, you know.

In, in America right now, the Republicans have the Senate, the House, the judiciary. They have the right to Supreme Court and they have the presidency. Yeah.

“Democrats represent, it's a pretty 50 50 country, wouldn't you say?”

I mean, we're, you know, right now at least Democrats are represented by, you know, millions and millions and millions of votes. But they don't really have the way that the Republicans have governed any say in anything. And so wouldn't you say that trying to use any leverage that they possibly could have, to get things like reforms to ice agents that don't seem to be trained that are creating violence in the streets of America that aren't going after the worst of the worst. But are frightening, hardworking immigrants into staying in their homes.

Don't you think that's a legitimate reason to try and leverage whatever opportunity they would have. They would have TDS seems like a a convenient excuse for a lot of legitimate concerns.

“Hmm. Yeah. Well, the only actual tool and the only actual real leverage that Democrats have, that's the filibuster.”

A hundred percent, you know, and I just had an op-ed in the Washington Post. And I was trying to remind America and Democrats specifically that we, including me, we were so wrong about scrapping the filibuster back in the 2022 cycle. Now, we all ran on that and we all were committed to eliminate the filibuster. And if we were successful, we may have passed some things back in 2022, but a hundred percent in January of 2024 or 2025, you know, they would have been able to run the table 100 percent run the table.

And if anyone that's listing have been horrified or troubled by the lot of the lot of legislation being proposed, that would have been amateur hour compared to how they would have been able to remake our society because they would have had the trifecta. Trump was at the apex of his power and they could have passed and done everything. And if the Senate was working on basic majority like the house, we would have rendered ourselves essentially a smaller version of the house. And they would have been able to remake our society.

Wouldn't you say they, they have remade our society, you know, by using gimmicks like reconciliation by using using executive power. And ways that hadn't been used before haven't they done that already. Yeah, well, a lot of those executive orders were just overturned or stopped by the courts. And now, you know, I kind of took, I kind of got waxed when I said, well, what is a real constitutional crisis that's when that's when the president is going to defy, you know, court orders. And because it doesn't describe the solution in the constitution, that is a crisis. And as far as I know, that the president hasn't defied a single court order.

Now, a lot of noise, but he hasn't defied any specific ones. Well, he has, I mean, he's he's defied court orders and congressional law. I mean, just even in the TikTok case, you know, you guys voted that that had to be divested.

And he just ignored that. He just didn't do it. And then he handed a pretty powerful social media tool to his friends, the lessons and and other people.

I guess that's my point is, I understand you're saying there are certain norms or things that you don't want Democrats to do. But given the legitimate concerns that people have about executive overreach, you know, these types of sure. Well, that's a real thing. But of course, yeah, but, but I'd like to revisit this idea of the filtruster, the Democratic Party, and I am part of it. And I was definitely part of that to eliminating the filtruster, how dangerous that was if we were successful.

And now we would have been a whim of the political extremism and the available to pass everything.

“The only thing that we, we've ever stopped, save, save America, act and other things.”

Yeah, that's, that's the only thing the filtruster has actually done. In fact, you've played kind of a role in getting their nominees going. You've been kind of the contradictory vote from the Democrats to get him some pretty controversial appointees. I'm just curious, because the filtruster seems like it hasn't really stopped them from doing getting the people that they want getting unqualified people into the cabinet, into the Department of Justice.

Yeah, I mean, and many of them, many of them I didn't vote for, and if you're going to bring up Blanche, I'm not going to vote for him.

Right. Well, too. There's some that I would vote for.

“And then there's, there's many that I have it because that it's just I don't believe that's the kind of right person for for for the job overall.”

I really try to call balls and strikes. I do think, like, for example, Mayorkas, he did a terrible job. He was, it was never should be impeached. He didn't break the law. You know, incompetence, you know, is not, you know, for impeachment, but overall trying to describe an honor as assessment that as as a Democrat from Pennsylvania, that's been, that's been my role. And if you look at my voting record, you know, I haven't, I haven't changed these core things like pro choice. I don't pick on turn or back on the gay or trans community in America.

And very, very pro immigration, very, very pro union, all of those kind of boilerplate kinds of democratic issues that that hasn't changed. So, so that that's where we're at. And now you talk about ice. Absolutely. You know, like I called for a gnome, she has to go and that we brought in a new leader now. I've said this, deport all of the criminals 100% deport all of them. I hope we could all agree on those things. We need to secure our border. We do need to secure a border. And then I've said, do not target otherwise hardworking, you know, migrants that are a very important part of our economy, specifically like in my state and agriculture.

To, or tourism, or these other kinds of positions to try to find the right balance of of secure a border, deport all the criminals, but stop targeting otherwise innocent kinds of migrants here. But they are, they are doing it was a farmer dreamer. Yeah, right. But that's my point is so they are targeting those people. And they are, you know, there have been killings and even a home and has admitted that the training on the killing and in a camera if it was main or if it was the one in Minnesota, you know, there's quite a few of them.

So, I guess my question to you is.

“You're agreeing with, uh, uh, uh, the majority, I think of of Democrats on that. Yeah, but not a green vocal like right, but not agreeing with their method of trying how to Democrats influence that.”

If the Trump administration is running roughshod over what you just said, they're not just doing the criminals. They've deported citizens. They're, or, or they've jailed citizens. They've taken, uh, immigration, which was generally a civil concern and made it a criminal concern. They want to build giant warehouses where they just bring people that are there on on civil violations or what used to be civil violations. So if they can't use things like a threat of a shut up, where would, where would you suggest they use their lack of power?

Well, you know, I work with the new Secretary Mullen and now all of those warehouses in Pennsylvania were canceled. I mean, that, that's a fact. And shut the government down on that. There wasn't one single ice reforms or anything. You know, like you can want reforms and you can engage in those dialogue, but shutting the government down when that has zero zero impact on the way home land security is going to

operate because they were funded through the big beautiful bill. The thing that I never, I did not vote for that is well, too. They had a limited money.

So for me, it was a decision. So should I just vote to shut our government down even though every single Democrat in my caucus knew that it would have no direct or even an indirect leverage over ice to behave the way that we all want them to do. So do that. That's, that's a demand from an agitated angry base. And I'm willing to say, look, that's the wrong thing. That's the wrong solution for a reasonable conversation. I have what people saying we want to make those kind of changes for ice. So, so what is the way to make those changes? Because my understanding of the shutdown was they were saying we will shut it down unless you make those changes.

Yeah, and there was no, there was no forced any kinds of things. So we, you know, the Democratic caucus there walked away with empty pockets about shutting our government on on both sides.

So it's, it's a reasonable kind of concerns, but it's the wrong tool of the solution in order to achieve it when elections, when elections. And then that puts you in the better position.

“Ground news. That's what I'm talking about. Because these guys, they're not listen. You know me. I'm not a big fan of the news outlets. Those bastards. That's right. Can I say that on this? Bastards.”

Ground news is a website and an app. Because this is America in the 2020s. You got to have an app and it helps you better understand the news you consume. They got a blind spot feed, helps you find stories that aren't being covered by your side. It is instructional in a way you begin to see the matrix.

The matrix, not the matrix three.

Or even two, the matrix, the actual matrix. The one with Neo, the real, not the, you know what I'm talking about. You can see who owns every news outlet. And you compare how these different outlets frame their stories like, "Basos might frame it differently." Not just, I was just a name that popped into my head. No reason. No reason why. To get the same unlimited access to the Vantage subscription, go to groundnews.com/stored. And subscribe to get 40% off. I've partnered with Ground News to get you the discount that is available only for a limited time. That's groundnews.com/stored.

Or scan the QR code on screen. Thank you to Ground News for sponsoring this episode. [Music] And now you have my, my party, you know, they're returning back to the worst impulses of abolish ice, abolish the border and say these kinds of extreme things. You're saying the Democratic Party is returning to abolish ice and abolish border. Yeah, I mean, a lot of the people that are winning like, you know, when we're filming this, you know, in Michigan, both, you know, the person that's going to win is a calling to abolish ice.

And then the governor race and Wisconsin, she, in fact, she even said abolish prisons as well too.

“Well, she's, but she said that she had said that previously and she's walked that back in the same way that a lot of people. Well, I mean, he did a George Floyd moment said defund the police and then ultimately said, you know what?”

That that was an emotional response. And I think that was the wrong policy, but aren't you elevating what seems to be a. I mean, how many people have like three three DSA or five, it seems like the Democratic Party is is largely still just the Democratic Party. And there are some people that associate with either the DSA or social democracies that are that are gaining a foothold, but I, I don't imagine. How many, what are we talking about three or four? Well, it's, it's actually many more. There's one in Colorado. There's many in New York.

And now I just seen the, the recent poll over a third of Democrats identify themselves as socialists or have sympathies towards in that kind of way.

So it is, it is a significant issue. Right. And I would remind people, we got wrecked in 24 because a lot of the extreme things that we, we were saying in 2020 now came back to haunt us.

“And that's why we found ourselves here in the minority. And I'm saying, hey, we can't go back to the same extreme views because we have to win actual battleground states.”

It's not echo chambers in Brooklyn or now, and here you see the people with these extreme views are breaking through in Michigan and in Wisconsin and places like in Colorado and there. So I'm saying, let's resist these extreme kinds of views to abolish everything. And now the DSA is is an emerging factor here. Now that's, I'm not elevating them. I'm just describing what I'm witnessing that's coming as a regular Democrat. And now that's, that's the reality. And I think I expect LCA will win by double digits.

So let me, let me see if I can frame this in a slightly different way. Why do you think it is that there is a kind of momentum behind these more, you know, as you would call them extremists or I would say, you know, they're a mix. There's a certain nuance to it. But don't you think that that's happening for a reason.

couldn't you say that this is happening because establishment Democrats, the party that you're talking about, that you think is the more reasonable party, hasn't delivered for people in the way that they think is appropriate.

You know, these moments don't happen out of thin air. These are conditions on the ground where people are dissatisfied with the status quo.

And you have candidates that come up and they present economic proposals and other proposals that feel more urgent to the moment.

“In other words, why are you blaming them when in some ways you could be blaming yourself in your colleagues?”

It's not, well, I'm not blaming. I'm describing here where we are in what's happening now, too. And and I'm like when we have people winning elections saying absurd kinds of positions that were absolutely toxic back in 2020 and saying stop saying these kind of extreme things are not workable in the real world overall. And don't we want to win? Do we want to be the people leading leading the conversation instead of having another kinds of subordinate position like we are currently in and have been since in January of 2025?

So you think you lost in 2024 because of the extremism of Kamala Harris and Tim Wolves or the Joe Biden administration?

In fact, El Syed, for example, he was a big leader in the uncommitted uncommitted saying don't vote Democrat don't vote for these people. And and now like some things that I've never done, you know, I drove thousands of thousands of miles all across Pennsylvania to try to elect

“Vice President Harris and I've done that. But on the ground, it's very clear we're going down because the energy and a lot of the way that they've been positioned as people that are not in touch with people.”

And we've lost the argument and at no point that I had a strong feeling that we can win this and anyone spent time in Pennsylvania there during that election. We all understood we have a serious challenge. Now you think this new sort of energy and economic populism is a response to that.

Well, what is that? Is that socialism and in more its communism? That's not an economic model that has never worked in in the history.

Aren't you just that sounds like a caricature that doesn't sell. El Syed is running on he wants to ban corporate money wants to tax, I guess, higher taxes on billionaires for housing and education, Medicare for all, you know, when you say that's communism.

“That feels like that feels like a caricature.”

And I call real communists that that are cheering for communism people like Hassan Piker, for example, you know, he's a big big influence, you know, and the democratic party conversation. And he is he is a communist. He celebrates Mao and describes in this going to be proud to visit Cuba and stand on people on those sides. That's not a smear. That's just the using the kinds of words and the positions that he has as Paul made part of part of his platform. So you're saying he says, I'm a communist and I want America to be communist.

No, I'm saying, I'm saying that he has the kinds of views. Now you were very, very instrument and delivering aid for victims of 9/11, you know, like in a you've been here and you've been very effective for do that. Now for an individual, it says that America, we deserve that. Hey, I'm deeply offended by that and I don't support that and I'm certainly not going to campaign with him or I'm not going to explain that way. Mar said that the 9/11 terrorist weren't cowards and you went on his podcast and you talked to him all the time.

So I guess what I'm saying is aren't you cherry picking certain things and maybe losing the forest for the trees. Two, two things are not the same, you know, making it making a statement compared to saying that we deserve that opposed to describing it in different terms. So that's just not that's just not, but he's he's not running and bill more is not a communist to bill more does not describe Hamas is a thousand percent better than Israel. So for you, it's it literally is. They've made statements in the past or or their economic policies are more sympathetic to socialism. So let me let me shift it a bit.

Absolutely, I'm absolutely proud, proud American capitalists and I do think, you know, I'm much more concerned about our country losing losing the China and the AI race. And now for me another unpopular view that I might have is the Democrat data centers data centers if we ban them or we have a long term moratorium. China would be related, related on that and you have frontier models like mythos and now the new AI version one, they've been able to break out. They've been able to break out and to hack and go attack other kinds of organizations.

Thank God that they're American companies, the second the Chinese are able to have those frontier models and unleash them on there.

So though that's going to make these small small potatoes in terms of the kind of economic damage that that an AI model with those kind of capabilities like mitos, you know, in the Chinese hands or say another one.

“Now that's what I'm really concerned about for me.”

But that I mean, that's a case for stronger regulation, which we aren't doing because the AI companies should we should have regulation right, but they're we're not doing it because the AI companies are paying millions and millions of dollars into our government, but I want to get back to sort of what we're talking about. I mean, you're a capitalist so this is I just want to reframe the argument a little bit because Piker, I don't think is a communist, I think he said he's socialist, but the point being, do you think capitalism isn't one of the reasons there's so much energy on the left now for this type of populist rhetoric is that many people believe that capitalism as we are practicing it.

I mean, a lot of corruption, chronic capitalism, a lot of the playing field is tilted towards capital investment and away from labor.

That capitalism as it is being practiced in America is increasing inequality and leaving too many people behind and that this energy is not there necessarily to destroy it. But to reform it in a way that will rebalance the the scale, this is I guess what I'm asking is don't you think this is coming from the lived experience of people under the way capitalism is being practiced in America in this moment.

“I think I return it back to this idea that AI is transforming the world 100% where you have to like it or not.”

It's like if someone is going to win and for me I want America to win that because we are the good the good guy in this and now the second we, we hinder our own ability to develop these kind of tools. The the Chinese will seize the lead and then they would weaponize that in ways and the kinds of damage they could inflict are untold trillions and that that's my real concern for a lot about that overall.

No I think I'm understanding sort of your position on on AI I'm talking about the broader conversation on your being very critical of those on the left.

No no I'm not being critical I'm just describing and and I'm saying you know if anything the left is very critical about is as the Democrat is for me that began I have very strong views on Israel you know and I think it's a wrong thing to shut our government down. I understand but I'm talking about the broader.

“You're saying you don't like these people because they're socialist and communists.”

No you're a capitalist. Not a personal thing. It's not a personal thing. Well you've called them the dirt bag left which is somewhat personal. The dirt bag left yeah absolutely that is a term that is a term absolutely.

I mean it's yeah it's somewhat derogatory but but my I guess I'm trying to to get to the point saying. Do you think the way capitalism is working in this country is working is working the way that it should. And don't you think that your voters and you describe yourself as a progressive years ago you don't do it anymore but don't you think your voters are feeling the effects of a system. That benefits capital and disadvantages labor. I mean for for me this this idea there you know in terms of what what is what is a progressive.

Right now but for increasingly you know the defining issue with the Democratic party is is Israel and the Gaza war overall that.

My proud standing with Israel through everything after ten seven has put me and odds more than anything individual and anything else overall.

Hey everybody if you know me you know I like to cook that's that's the first thing that you think of.

“Stopping herbs that I grew myself on land that I plowed with my hands I don't even have a plow I use my hands that's how I much I love.”

The earth and food but for those of you who are not like that who are not me who don't grow your own award winning cabbages.

Surely you follow my work at the state fairs with cabbages.

It's coming to call factor factor will do everything that I do out of love for you. Out of convenience the factor will shop prep cook and they will deliver it to your door not only will they shop prep and cook that's. You don't even you don't have to get out of your chair that you just leave your gullet open I wouldn't be surprised if they'd pour it down your throat.

“I don't even think they might even chew it for you that's how good these people are.”

They're fresh they're not frozen yet there you it meals ready in two minutes and and the hundred meals to choose from more than that probably labor I am the bear that is my life. But not everybody has that commitment not everybody is a Michelin star home maker like I am and if you're not factor makes hidden them nutrition goals easily without planning and grocery runs and cooking so please please. This for you so head to factor meals dot com slash TWS 50 off and use code TWS 50 off to get 50% off and free daily greens per box with new subscription only.

“While supplies last until September 27th 2026 C website for more details.”

So you're saying though just to be clear you believe that capitalism is is working very well and that we really don't need. And I'm what I'm saying john is is that's a fair question and I'll respond where is an example across the globe where it's working better socialism or communism have behaved in a better way that's more fair or equitable. Well, so social to democracy or have rate have raised the living of standard. So here's here's what I'm trying to to get at is that you're saying the argument is between capitalism the way it is you get what you get and you don't get upset.

Or socialism and communism and I'm saying the greatest threat to capitalism is that it's not delivering for the majority of people because the system is rigged for those who have capital and investment money there's a million different ways that they do it. Or tax rates on capital than labor on tax or barely tax unrealized gains corporate tax cuts corporate loopholes offshore friendly rules there's there's a million different things so let's go back to the 30s in the 20s and 30s norm and Thomas was the socialist candidate for president.

Jean Debs was a candidate for president these were socialist they were people that they felt like it was the guilt that age inequality it wasn't working for people.

Depression hit the new deal basically incorporated a lot of those socialist ideas for a social safety net for better laws for labor unions benefited greatly from that.

And a lot of that energy came from what you would call the dirt bag left at that time. I would say saved capitalism and saved America from having. More of a more socialist or communist type revolution and don't you think we would be better off using the energy from the left for ideas like ban and corporate money and strengthening labor unions all stuff that I imagine you support rather than denigrating them and caricatureing them why not work with them.

And then some things are too expensive without it out there are but eventually I think the market will address that back in 24 the whole world was eggs eggs eggs eggs eggs you know out of control and now then when it when it returned back to a normal price. And then people don't talk about eggs anymore so it's it's a lot of these other thing you know overall and then world war two and that reminds the world that we saved we saved democracy in our country and we are the good guys and there are people on the far left now they're making it seem that in America is is the problem or we are the we are the aggressor or we are behind.

So in other words, if else I had or AOC or Bernie Sanders has proposals that strengthen a social safety net or readjust corporate tax rates or change the way that or here's just a simple one tax capital capital gains in the same way you would tax salaries like work is for suckers.

“Work is taxed at a higher level than investments doesn't that doesn't that tilt the playing field to people who already have money and if the progressive left is saying these are the types of things that we need to do.”

What in that appeal to you. Well what appeals to me is eliminating unlimited money and politics without a doubt and that's a position that they hold.

Well it's it's not they they don't own that it's like I've been saying that I mean any reasonable person realized that unlimited money is a poison in American democracy I've been saying that from the beginning it's not it's not something that they own. Or for that now my race my race my race is 320 million dollars in my race in 22 and then in the 24 cycle was half a billion dollars for a Senate race and now watch watch how out of control that race is going to get here in 26 and then in 28 it's going to make my race look quaint in terms of the the billions of dollars that are being thrown at that that more than anything is the accelerant on and it's fueling a lot of the extremism for now to.

And and also another problem is the primary system to the extreme extreme views are the most activated and they are the most part of the primary. And then that pushes people away from a reasonable kind of solution for thing to you know it.

“Whether on both sides left or right to and and I I reject both the extremes on on either side but it seems like you're more comfortable.”

Angerly denigrating.

The extreme or what you consider the extreme on the left and the right like in the in the way that you felt.

I say in in the way that you talked to Elsa said like why call them pro Hamas if they just want to criticize. I said that because he's campaigning with people that are absolutely pro Hamas. What you mean, Hassan Piker you say is pro Hamas and so you're you're basing this just on that. He said, you know, like if you campaign and proud to align yourself with pro very pro Hamas people. That's a reasonable person to conclude is like, yeah, you know, I have a pro view for Hamas.

But I guess what I'm saying is I feel like you're caricaturing people's views.

“If their critical of Israel if someone says, I think Hamas and Israel are both criminal are going to, you know, doing killing people for terrible reasons.”

That's how is that pro Hamas? That's not saying. But I'm saying it's like people that just says Hamas is a thousand percent them are democratic or ally is real. Then yeah, that's pro Hamas. But saying they're less evil than Israel if they think Israel is evil is not the same as pro.

I'll give you an example. No, like like Piker's Piker said a lot of incredibly, you know, very pro Hamas kind of thing. I'm not going to it's like it's like if you support Hamas and campaign with people that support Hamas, then that identifies someone as pro Hamas. I guess what I'm saying is I don't, I have not seen statements where these candidates say I am pro Hamas.

What I have seen is statements where they are very critical of Israel, the Israeli government and the way that they've conducted themselves in Gaza.

And I guess I'm having trouble figuring out why I feel like you're caricaturering it. Let me go out this a different way. Your pro gay rights. Yes. Yeah, I mean, I'm coming up on the 13th.

I'm on the pro 13th anniversary.

First person to to solemnize a gay marriage, you know, when it was illegal in Pennsylvania.

Beautiful. And you're and you're someone who is pro trans rights or or. Absolutely. Okay. I was I was the only Democrat that saying, you know, when when when they actively were trying to ban trans Americans from our military.

Right. You know, so what the right would say about that is that your pro mutilation of children. That's what they would say. That would be their caricature of your position.

“Do you agree that that's what they would say?”

What I would say is what I'm saying is is right now. Our party is starting to elect people that are going to struggle to win in the kinds of places that are going to define who's going to win in 28. That's that's a fact.

And now a lot of these ideas and a lot of these extreme views are coming from the kind of people that have never won a real competitive election.

In state that holds both sides, you know, and hold people accountable to explain away forward when we live in a very divided country right now. So overall, I think the responsibility is to police to police your own ranks. You know, and it's like there's plenty of people as I've been criticizing some of the Republican views. But overall describing what garbage is garbage like p hustle and main. And you know, like I was, you know, like he was an absolute garbage.

Oh, Platner. Platner. Yeah. I mean, like, so that's not a character. And you were saying that before the allegations of, of right. What I'm saying is like a Nazi tattoo on your chest means like, yeah, you probably have Nazi inclinations.

And if you are accused of roughing up your ex-girlfriends, yeah, that's, that's, that's a non-starter for me. And if you think an American hero, you know, that's being shot by the Taliban, that is a dumb mother fucker that deserves to die. I think that this qualifying is to, I think a main has a better person to represent, you know, my party. So there's just a couple things.

And I appreciate you having the conversation. If your concern is elections, you've been very fair here. Yeah. If your concern is winning elections, I don't know if you coming out and calling people pro-Hamas,

“which I think is a caricature of many of their positions, is that helpful to them?”

And second of all, you've been very, you know, you called President Trump a jag off in 2016.

Like we all, we all have tweets. I put it on a shirt. I sold them. You put it on a shirt. And now you've been very complimentary to him. And if you're concerned with Graham Platner, you didn't think he was very nice to women.

You're ignoring an awful lot of evidence for the current president about his relationship with women. So my point is, there seems like there's a way to go about this. That embraces, as you said, the 90% of things that you agree with. And try and utilize that energy to reform a party that has a worse public image than herpes in terms of getting things done. This feels like it's playing into the hands of Republican caricatures.

“Why can't people on the Democratic Pied finally figure out why Trump was so competitive and winning two out of the three last cycles?”

Why is he still here? Why are we still doing it? Because we keep losing and now we keep returning back some of the extreme thing. That's not a caricature. That is a fair assessment of where we are with these kind of things. But we didn't, you Kamala Harris was not a progressive left candidate. She was not a Tim Wall like there.

I guess everybody said Donald Trump couldn't win. Yeah, I campaign all across it there. And now in all those signature kinds of Trump things, big beautiful bill. I did not vote for that. And say, fact, I said, we'll not vote for that. And some of these big signature ones. And when we vote for Blanche in this week, when we're filmed, I will for him either is well now too.

So what really matters is the votes and what's behind that.

And that's fair. It criticized John Federman on Israel without a doubt, 100%.

So that's been primarily, and that's been driving our party in ways. Is that so for you, you could agree with them 90%, but Israel is the red line. Absolutely, Israel, for me, like I can't ever turn my back to Israel after where it's put. And I mean, no disrespect on this, but that is not our country. So it's, I don't understand, you're saying that these candidates may have great ideas for our economy.

They may want to do the exact same thing you want to do in terms of getting money out of politics. They may want to increase the social safety net. They may want to change the balance of power from capital back to labor. But if they don't agree with you on Israel, you don't want them in your party. Well, I don't know who you're referencing to specifically. No, I'm referencing what you just said.

The same one, Planner. So in other words, Sayed or AOC or Bernie Sanders, I assume you agree with a lot of what they say economically. And what I'm saying is like, if you are a DSA member, if you are a member of a specific political party, run under your own banner.

“And now I think Bill Morris had something very unsightfully said, you know, the DSA are colonizing, colonizing the democratic party.”

So just be Democrats if you're going to run under the democratic party for that. Why have a DSA party for overall? But aren't there aren't there things? It's it's just an organization. It's not we have a two party system. We don't. It's like the freedom caucus in the Republican party. There are, you know, there's Randy fine and Ogys and all these nut bags that are also part of an area and Republicans, I'm sure may not agree with all of them on all kinds of things. But there is no other party. I guess you could, you could try it. But my point is, if you don't disagree with them on a lot of things, why not use some of that energy?

And even like Mamdoni in New York is DSA, but there are things in the DSA platform that he disagrees with. And I'm assuming there's probably things in the democratic platform that you might disagree with, but you don't disavow the entire thing. You're literally saying it's all we can all have discussions except when it comes to Israel, which is not America. It seems like a weird line to draw.

“Well, I don't think that's weird. I think what history demonstrates is that when people or government or people turn their back to the Jewish community things and really badly.”

Jewish community and Israel are not the same thing, brother man. That is not the same thing.

No, no, no. It's like, hey, it's like if I have to pick aside for after 10, 7 and after Iran, you know, I'm always going to stand with Israel.

I'm always going to vote and support whatever this necessary to predict themselves and to prosecute Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran too. And the very left never set a peep after Iran executed 30 to 40,000 young people in there just for protesting for democracy. You think that the left is pro Iran, not not the country, but the regime. They're not. I'm what I'm saying, what I'm saying though is like if if anyone in the Democratic Party is fine with Iran building a nuclear bomb, I disagree with that person.

“I think most people are, again, I think you're caricaturing the issue, but I want to, is there anything you would criticize Israel about?”

No, what I would say is that I have not a single Democrat that's willing to go on record saying, I'm cool. It's okay if I ran built a nuclear bomb. And then I supported last summer bombing the Iranian nuclear facilities. I think that was a necessary and important thing because Iran is becoming close, close, close, close to building a nuclear bomb. And that would create a bomb. I think the case was not made by this administration that Iran was close, Netanyahu has been claiming there two weeks away for the last 20 years.

But my point is, so, would you say everything Israel is doing is for their own self-defense, that the way that they've taken up. Destroying with enemies, yeah, yeah, that's destroying it.

Or flattening a tiny area and pushing 2 million people into 30 to 35 to 40% of that territory and having a siege of that area.

Is that in there, is that in their self-defense? No, what I'm saying, it's like people forget that how mass were just rapists and they were terrorizing and killing civilians.

And that's why they refuse to give them back and that's what forced Israel to engage in that Gaza war when they refuse to send their people.

And there is nothing in the prosecution of that war that gives you pause. What do you mean? The killing of tens of thousands of children. You know, absolutely awful, absolutely. Because Hamas has embed themselves, you know, behind these people and using the Palestinians as human shields.

“Sinwar described the death of innocent Palestinians as a necessary sacrifice. That's how Hamas has, there's not even that.”

There are people in Netanyahu's cabinet who have said they would like to nuke the Palestinians. Not Hamas, the Palestinians. I'm just, I guess what I'm trying to get at is, I don't understand why we can't criticize even someone that you think is an ally for actions that we deem to be morally reprehensible. Like, I don't understand how you can defend the settlements in the West Bank.

Like, I don't understand how you have no criticisms over their actions, over their increasingly messianic, ultra-right-wing government. That seems to think relentless war is the, like, that you can bomb people out of resistance. But have you ever seen a movie called Gatekeepers? It's people that have been in Shinbet and ran the army in Israel. And they're talking about how the strategy that Israel has of disproportionate retaliation.

Even though they are by far the most powerful force in that region is not a path to keep Israel safe.

Everybody, you know, obviously it's a podcast, so like, you gotta do ads. That's just just kind of the way the world works. And you do the ads and you're trying to be selective in terms of the companies like somebody might come to you and say,

“you know, we'd like to advertise with you and you're like, wait, but don't you guys make a death star?”

But every now and again, a company comes along and you're like, oh shit, I use those. Hey, you actually go like, oh yeah, those are great. And that's where we're right now, bomb us. I use those. And not just like not in the sense of like, oh, socks. Yeah, I mean, everybody uses those. I'm not a delicate flower. I'm not, I'm not one of those bold, doxider, no sock dudes that we all read about in the 80s,

bonfire of the vanities and such, none of that. No, I wear the socks for comfort, but the socks I wear are bomb us.

They're phenomenal socks. They're soft. They're top of the line. They feel incredible on on the feet.

“When your feet feel good, that's the starting block. That's the baseline. That's your foundation.”

You know what I'm saying? Now they got t-shirts and underwear. Two. What? Start with the foundation and build all the way up in comfort. And generosity, by the way, head over to bomb us.com/weekly and use code weekly for 20% off your first purchase. That's b-o-m-b-a-s dot com slash weekly code weekly that check out. Do it now, you fucks. What I'm saying is that Israel was entirely open to a two-state solution. They were offered a two-state solution.

You know, I actually got a chance to talk to a former resident Clinton about that. And reminds the people that they were offered 96% of the West Bank, and they get to pick 4% for part of Israel. And they had East Jerusalem as the capital. And they would have had their entire nation and now going on 26 years. Now they reject that. They did not want a two-state solution. They have a one-state solution. And that's from the river to the sea. And that's part of why anti-Semitism is run a muck in our college campuses.

And in the streets and now their protesters showing up in my office at my home and following me and screaming and calling about and claiming about genocide. And now it's not a genocide. And if there was a genocide, that's because Iran refuses to relinquish this idea that they can destroy Israel. Now live in peace, and now live your lives and stop funneling billions into the Hezbollah and Hamas trying to destroy Israel.

Will Netanyahu win or not overall. But that's the true only democracy and anti-Aurasian.

So it's like I've never said that Israel is perfect. What I'm saying though, that's our special ally.

And until we're in middle of the war, I'm going to stand with our special ally and describe the circumstances with Hamas or Azbalah or the way Iran continues to behave. No one's saying it's not a dangerous neighborhood.

“But I think the behavior of that government is worth more than and as they're not just special neighbor and ally, where the ones who fund a great deal of it.”

You know, Israel has made in the way that they've sort of indirectly funded Hamas. It's very difficult for moderates. And we're getting into a whole thing here. But I think you believe Netanyahu and his government are operating a good faith that they really want a peace deal. And I'm saying they're not Netanyahu has been very clear that he doesn't want a two-state solution. He said it.

He said it's not going to happen. There will be no two-state solution.

And yet they say that they're a democratic state. But demographics there would say they can't be a true democracy because they'd be worried about that deluding what they consider to be their Jewish state. Now, that's a whole other argument of whether states should be this or that. But the point being that when we went to war in Iraq or we went to war in Afghanistan, I criticized America for the way that they were prosecuting that war. And the Cavalier way in which we were wasting American treasure and American lives that doesn't make me pro al Qaeda.

In the same way that if you criticize Israel for devastating and enormous group of people because of Hamas, not Palestinians, Hamas. They are not the same. Jews are not the same as Israel.

They are the government that the Hamas, the Palestinian people have elected.

What has it 2008 and there hasn't been an election since and it was a desperate people in a siege situation. Yeah, because they elected a murderous system now. The Iran pulled out the settlements from Gaza and then you had a double blind study where was Israel going to help the moderates or was it going to empower the extremists and Israel's actions during that time empowered the extremists and undercut the moderates. And they've done that over and over and over again. You can say that the Palestinians are trying to kill the Jews, right? But let's say it's Hamas or Hezbollah or whatever it is or Iran.

Jewish settlers are killing Palestinians. And when they asked Netanyahu about it, he said, well, it's just like a hundred to a hundred and fifty juvenile delinquents. And we can't quite get a handle on it. Meaning Israel wasn't able to control this small element that was killing people. Does that mean that the international community should say you don't deserve a state because you don't have total control of the violent elements in your myths.

“But that's what they're saying. Why does Israel get to decide?”

Well, the defining question is, does Israel engage in a genocide in Palestine? Well, according to the people that define those things, yes. Okay, well, and I strongly disagree with that by definition, that wasn't a genocide. The Jewish community actually experienced a true true genocide for that now. If Israel's goal was to eliminate as many Palestinians as possible, they've could have accomplished that in a lot, a lot long time ago for that.

They were not engaging in a genocide. Just because you're killing a group, just because you're killing a group slowly doesn't mean you're not killing a group. Just because you could do it faster. Yeah, no, no, no. That was the terrible cattle, the collateral of an urban war that forced Israel to fight behind.

Because Hamas was holding their hostages and refused to disarm and send our people back home.

“I think they've killed like 1200 Palestinians since the ceasefire.”

Yeah, most of them were were killing Hamas leadership. And I think that's necessary. You know, when you have people that were responsible for organizing 10/7, and I was like, I think it's entirely appropriate to eliminate them. I think eliminating the people who organized 10/7 is entirely appropriate.

That is absolutely correct. But in the same way that if we had gone into Afghanistan and just flattened it,

The issue here is dehumanization.

“Whether you're dehumanizing Jews and relating them to Israel,”

when you dehumanize a group, when you're unable to discern the difference between the worst, the same way we're doing with our immigration policy, it all ties together through Middle East policy. If we allow dehumanization in any form, then we are complicit in the results of those dehumanizing actions.

And by being unable to tell the difference between a democratic socialist and a social democrat, and a Hamas supporter and a communist and a Zionist and a Jew and Netanyahu and actor and good faith, we lose the ability to solve the problems that we're facing, because we are caricatured and dehumanizing. John, is it a fair question here?

Has become the term Zionist? That's become a slur on the democratic side. If someone refers to your Israel or your Zionist, that's become essentially a slur for people to say that thing. And that's part of where the party has lost its way,

and if you're describing people that I'm very supportive of a Jewish state, and they've weaponized that against people.

“I think if they believe that Jewish state is acting in a manner that is overly violent,”

and dehumanizing and constantly at war in a region, that's where that's coming from. Well, or it's like if Hamas refuses to disarm, and they refuse to send their people back home,

I mean, then still right now, they've never been able

willing to just disarm and now start the process. That made them viable targets, and I support Israel eliminating people that were part of planning 10/7. I think most people support people eliminating those who support 10/7, but will Israel disarm the settlers?

I mean, they've given them weapons. And those weapons are being used to kill. There are moving parts, but what makes it impossible right now because Hamas and Iran and Hezbollah refuse to say, "Look, we've lost, and now we have to find a better way to rebuild our society."

And I'd remind people that Iran eliminated and just killed in their streets, and just killed tens of thousands of its own young people. Yes, they're hanging, they're hanging teenagers for just asking for democracy, too. I don't see the kind of college protest,

I'll rage and saying how Iran has done and they continue." Because they don't consider Iran an ally. They don't give money to Iran. We don't give billions of dollars a year to Iran. We sanction them.

We try to do various things to remove. We try and scorn them. We try and create the situation to undermine that regime. But what we haven't learned is that 40 and 50 years of endless wars don't get us the peaceful results that we are searching for.

They don't make it that the whole point of all of this is to build coalitions of nations of good faith to try and create a safer and less violent world and not just play into it with bigger weapons and more weapons because we see what happens.

All the bombing that we've done in Iran and they've got some lawnmower parks and a couple of radio shack things and they continue to keep the straight-a-horse moves close. Like when are we going to learn that violence or in Steven Miller's thing, right?

It makes right. When are we going to learn that's not necessarily the case that the whole point for us should be to create

“a society and institutions that move us away from that violence?”

Because we've already discovered a quarter century ago that peace and negotiating a very incredibly insanely fair settlement they rejected that, they don't want that. You know, we've tried other things right now. And if Hamas and Iran did not

done what's happened in 10/7, we wouldn't be having this conversation right now. I don't know that we wouldn't be having this conversation right now

because at every turn the answer has always been

tighter control over areas that Palestinians live in and more bombing and more things. I don't necessarily know that that's the case and all the Arab states in 2002 offered Israel

and Israel rejected it.

And Rabin, who was trying to make peace in that area

with the Palestinians, was assassinated not by Hamas but by an Israeli extremist. So the idea that they are somehow blameless or have done nothing wrong is I don't understand why we can't criticize them.

Well, I'm not ever going to think, well, they have a valid point if they're killing and firing rockets at civilians and now they're raping them. And they're filming, you know, setting families on fire

for the way they behave that thing. And they abuse the own Palestinians to and all of those short accusations have been distributed. No question about starving people and now the UN just acknowledges.

Actually, Hamas has been stealing all of the aid and they keep the prime stuff and they resell the stuff to the poor Palestinians as well too. A lot of that thing.

So I just got, I mean, even senior military officials

had told the New York Times in July of 2025 that there was no evidence that Hamas systematically stole UNA. But that's not the point. I know when it fixes that there was evidence there.

They were right.

“It's actually, I think if we don't have the ability”

to criticize a so-called ally for egregious and violent behaviors, then we are not an ally. And we shouldn't be because we should have the ability to stand up morally

in situations that we need to, even for people that we believe to be on our quote-unquote side. And our inability to do that is a real detriment to our own moral foundation.

Yeah, I mean, I'm very much aware

what the democratic base would demand of me

and to have the specific kind of beliefs and views and take the kind of votes. And I refuse to do that, knowing exactly that that would put me in political peril. And I don't have any regret about those things.

So but overall for me, you know, when you have this existential kind of a war after 10/7, and how things continue to continue for under those terms out,

it's like, what side? Hamas Israel, Israel, that's an easy choice. He's below firing tens of thousands of rockets said civilians in Israel. I actually going to support Israel.

What about-- What about Iran? It's something right now. What about team humanity? Oh, yeah.

I mean, I am. Where it's not actually that choice. It's about why are we-- why are we willing to sacrifice so many young people

“that have nothing to do with any of this in that region?”

For this idea that it's merely Hamas versus Israel. That's just an over, I think, simplification of what's happening there. Yeah. I mean, and what's becoming is this entire conversation?

Yeah, you're right. You're a very fair conversation. No, no, no, no. I appreciate it. And it's like, I-- this become the ultimate litmus,

you know, as Democrats emerging right now. And now I'm not dumb. I know voting, voting against the war powers thing. I know that's incredibly toxic as a Democrat right now. But I do think it's fundamentally important

to make sure that Iran is not able to build a nuclear bomb. So that's-- that's just put me where I'm at. We have different views. And that's-- that's defining the Democratic Party. I-- and some ways I think we have the same views

but with different strategies. I guess what I would say is, I'm not down with the nuclear bomb, and I'm not down with Hamas, and I'm not down with a murderous Israeli regime

that dehumanizes a huge group of people either. I'm not down with a world that has lost the ability to solve its problems through collective action and diplomacy. That's the biggest problem.

And our government is complicit in that as well now. You know, that dysfunction. How do we get back to that, Senator? How do we get back to a functional-- like even the immigration system,

Lankford comes up with a solution that both parties sign off on. A Donald Trump comes in before the election and it says, "Tank it," because I want to run on the dysfunction

of the immigration system. Yeah, and I knew we would get rolled on that. I'm like, there's no chance the Trump is going to hand over one of their largest kinds of issues. Like, I fully expect that we were going to get rolled

over the bipartisan deal on an immigration now. So that's what happened.

“So in your mind, is it possible to get back to that?”

Or are we now just in a dysfunctional cycle? And are you more worried about the progressive left than you are about the right? I'm worried about people forgetting that.

It's like, you know, have the kind of use that the majority of people that are going to define who's going to be the next wave of leadership.

“You know, you have to win these people over”

and not offend them or to put them off the way that's already happened and have made the Trump administration so competitive over the last three cycles, winning two of the three and could have easily won

the one in the middle now, too. Now there was no voter fraud in Pennsylvania. I was a lieutenant governor. I've described that. Secure, you know, absolutely fair, fair, fair.

If you only complain about an election, if you lose, then obviously that's demonstrating that that's what's behind those things. So that's where we're at.

And these extreme views that have never won

a meaningful election overall, I'm saying, let's consider, like, let's not revisit that after we've seen how badly that's ended. Any possibility they're running to the left in the primary and will tack a little bit

to the center in the regular election? Well, I mean, who knows how that's going to be. The under these extreme things, you know, Trump administration has made virtually anything politically possible.

“And that's why you have some of these people”

in our party winning that have described things and extreme views that it's made it's okay or they dismiss it or say that it doesn't really matter. All right. Well, we certainly appreciate the conversation senator.

You've been very generous with your time. You've been wearing a suit, which I have to tell you, gives you little gravitas. As you were talking, I was like, you know, I wasn't going to listen to this guy,

but I'm a little girl, John.

You know, I've always been a long-term fan,

like we discussed where when you made some guys famous because of the sixth degree from bacon. Kevin Bacon. Yeah, that's a long I've been with you back then. Did you go to college with those guys?

Yeah, yeah, I went to college with those guys. Yeah, all right. The sixth degree of Kevin Bacon, guys. I found out the genius that Kevin Bacon was connected to entire the universe over all.

So that's a long I've followed you, but thank you for having me on. And this was a very fair conversation. Well, that's very kind of you, sir. I appreciate your time and I appreciate your passion.

Likewise. And enjoy the rest of your day. You as well. Thank you, sir. Take care.

Hey, folks. I know most people look at me and they think to themselves. Well, that's a fashion player right there. But actually, you know what I am comfortable. You might be thinking about it.

Sure, if you were the same t-shirt. That's last week. But do you know where you can find clothing that fits into this? A comedy that I actually love. Quince.

Quince has got all the false staples, denim, boots, leather jackets, the unbelievably soft what they call there. 100% Mongolian cashmere sweaters. I'm not talking about, you know, Des Moines cashmere. Mongolian cashmere.

So what makes Quince ever? They work directly with ethical factories. They cut out the middleman. You get top quality materials and craftsmanship to have the price of other premium brands.

Go to Quince.com/ TWS for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns. Quince.com/ TWS. Folks, I don't know if you can hear it in my voice. I'm tired.

And sleep well last night. I need a good night's sleep.

I always need a good night's sleep.

And you know what I could do? I could buy a new mattress. A little, maybe a princess bed. Maybe get a little foreposed or thing. Throw some mosquito net.

Maybe get a little foreposed or thing. Throw some mosquito netting on there. Just spend a ton of money.

“Or I could do the only thing that matters.”

Get some nice sheets. Some nice clean freshly done comfortable sheets. That's what you need. The bowl and branch way. It's the best way to get a better night's sleep is the bedding.

Get the nice bedding. You don't want to chafing bedding. I sleep in Corderoi. Who would do that? Makes no sense.

You can upgrade your sleep with bowl and branch. Get 15% off your first order. Plus free shipping. bowl and branch dot com slash TWS with code TWS. Bowl and branch.

B-O-L-L-A-N-D branch dot com slash TWS code TWS. That's a lot of 15% off. Exclusions apply. [MUSIC PLAYING]

Yeah.

I'm not really sure what to think here.

He definitely feels very strongly about certain issues. One in particular. Yeah. Yeah. I feel like we all just got out of one of those movies.

You know, there was a weirdly traumatizing scene in the movie. Yeah. And now we're all just like, do you guys-- I'm going to take the sea train. Do you want to go get something?

I guess I'm just going to go get a slice and make it go home. Sit and look quiet together. Yeah. But I'm weirdly thrown off right now. Yeah. I mean, what I will say in looking into him is like, he's right.

He does vote with Democrats over 90% of the time. And even though, you know, he doesn't grant that same leniency to other people that vote with him. That would vote with Democrats 90% of the time because he disagrees with them over Israel. Like, he is better.

“You know, I think about it in baseball terms.”

Like, he has a high war. He's better than, he's better than memodaws in terms of wins above replacement. But I was sure. You have no idea how happy you're making me right now. If you start going into advanced Senate analytics, he has a high war.

Fantastic. You know, he's better than a Republican in that position. And I think a lot of Republicans would say he has a high war in that he's better than a Democrat in that position. But I think both parties would rather somebody more in line with their viewpoints in that position. And so the fact that he's running again, I think it's totally delusional.

Well, he's going to have to pull either and independent. I don't think Republicans. I mean, maybe he can win there as a Republican. I just don't know how. Now, I don't think he can win there as a.

I don't know what he would have to do to to flip that around. He made it totally fair point that in terms of the signature legislation of this administration. He has not been on board with it. What he has done is made it a little bit. He's, you know, grease the wheels a bit on tough votes for them.

He's made it so they can peel off a couple people here and there. Susan Collins, guess what? You get to look good to Maine because John Fetterman has flip sides. And that's called politics. If you're not good at doing that, you shouldn't be in politics.

“And the other thing that I think he did acknowledge is that it's one thing to vote with Democrats 90% of the time.”

It's another thing to recognize. People's frustration with Democrats, not delivering when they had power, when they're out of power. Like the reason why the energy is coming from the left is dissatisfaction with this. It's not extremism. Kamal Harris didn't lose because the country thought she was not an extreme.

It's that Democrats didn't believe in her enough. Didn't present a vision. She just present a vision. Only at 107 days. Why? I remember I used the days.

You guys brought it up last time. And I didn't know that it was 107. And now this time I know.

He's never going to forget it ever.

Tatoo don't know. I'm never going to forget it ever again. Brittany. Should we take a deep breath and do some questions? Yeah.

Should we take a shot? Let's do some questions. I do feel like what up. All right. All right.

What do we got Brittany? John. Did senators coordinate until us just get bamboozled by Trump and Blanche? Or will Trump and Blanche keep their word? Oh, I think they'll keep their word.

You know, there's a saying in Washington. There is no more honorable promise. And a Trump promise.

“That's why, you know, they don't just build triumphal arches for everybody.”

Of course not. You have to earn the triumphal arches. You have to earn the drained reflecting rule. No, I think that in many ways, you have to earn the triumphal arches.

Tillerson, corn and took a large knife to the lining of the senate. To their own integrity alone. I mean, even in the thing, like, it's not just the weaponization.

Fund, the 1.8 billion, which I'm sure he'll reconstitute in some other.

Hey, it's 1.776, right? There's a weird 1.776 billion dollar gap in snack benefits to babies that don't have formula. He'll find it somewhere. But the idea that they didn't have the balls to be like,

oh, and you're not immune from the IRS. Yeah. Like, you don't just get to do whatever the fuck you want, whenever the fuck you want to do it. Like, that was their principled stand.

Like, and they've got nothing to lose. Nothing. They've heard you lost it all. You know what's nice to know about that, though? Sometimes you think, you know what? These guys are cowards.

They don't ever say it. They don't stand on principle because they're fearful of losing their livelihood in the senate. And it's nice to know that for these guys, they're actually just shitty. That there is no moral principle that they're standing on.

That freed from the bounds of primaries and losing your job. They still suck. Period. Just the worst. Love it.

What else we got? John.

Do you think a third party created by Tarker Carlson and Marjorie Taylor Green

“is the answer to the flaws of the two party political system?”

You know, I don't know. But, you know, obviously being one of the first people on their mailing list. I'm going to assume that I'll find out. To get into the Platinum subscriber circle that I had to do. And it's just a few feisty.

My favorite thing was the picture of it. Like, it's a picture. But it's taken for, like, I don't know if there was an ad-junct restaurant. Or like, a different, like, there was a little area over there by the Sunday bar. And they were like, do you guys want to take a picture of this?

Oh, and make sure no one can recognize us. I can do that. I can do that from way back. You want to make sure you get in the entirety of the restaurant. You want to get in all the decorations.

I think it was Tarker's house. What?

Oh, my God, you're right.

He lives in a cracker barrel. That his basement, it looks like it literally looks like an apple beast. Yeah. So this is this is the new Tucker, by the way. Yeah, the cabin and main Tucker.

Yeah, he was the old Tucker was I'm buckly. I've got the thing. I'm a young conservative with a sassy mouth and a Contrarian streak. And now he's like, I know.

I'm actually the Marburough man. Honey, I'm going to hit on out to the podcast minds. Put in my eight hours of day, toilin. We're the microphone. Get some dirt under his fingernails.

Let me get that dirt under them. Rub a little bit on the forehead and take one of them pictures in that. What do you call it to seepia?

Let me put five zines in my pants.

“Is that shoeless tobacco or are you just happy to see me?”

America first, baby. What else we got? Last, not least. What is James Carville? That is.

Did you see this closure day? Yeah, no. Now you know what he is. Oh, that's all fair. You know, that's the alien.

At the end, when he stood up. He was so tall. Listen. Cut to black. Listen.

Listen. You know, my favorite part about it was when he goes, I'm not going to be a part of any part of a party that hasn't piker's a part of. Well, didn't you just say like, He's a communist, so he's not part of your party.

So don't worry about it. I'm not going to play a part of a party that House of Parker has a role in and you're like, "Don't worry, you won't." Yeah.

I don't know if he understands how time works. Like, that's, I mean, and not to be gross about it. Yeah, that's fair. Yeah, that young guy. Yeah.

That's a fiery preacher for economic populism and other things. No, I'm going to wait till he burns himself out. And then I'm going to come back in in 2040. It's the 90s, baby. Let's go.

Me and Mary Madeline are going to do a show.

“Why do they keep putting him on TV because he's available?”

Because he'll say things that get aggregated. Like, in the same reason, like, you know, that they, they clip things. He's a guy that will say. And by the way, contradict himself every couple of months.

As soon as he's been proven wrong. Which, by the way, like, when was the last time you won something? Yeah. Foco, like, he tries to still get, or Clinton had, it's the economy stupid.

Yeah. So now he's playing on that still. It's like, that was, I don't know, 1992. I was, yeah. And he was out there now, like, it's the,

it's the socialism stupid. And everybody's just like, was that a play on? What is he talking about? Like, he's literally out there, like, Chippa canoe and communism too.

Like, 40% of the electorate did not vote in that election. Right. I don't like, like. I don't like, like, piker. I just like, what, I, nobody understands even the ref.

And I'm fucking 20 years younger than that dude.

All right. How do they keep in touch with us? Twitter. We are weekly show pod.

Instagram threads, ticked off the sky.

We are weekly show podcast.

“And you can like, subscribe, and comment on our YouTube channel.”

The weekly show with John Stuart. Oh, and I'm sure they will this week. Holy shit. [LAUGHS]

As always, unbelievable job.

Produce for Britney and MetaVic. Produce for Jillian Spear. Video editor and engineer Robotolo. Audio editor and engineer Nicole Boys.

“And our executive producers Chris McShane.”

And Katie Gray. We shall see you next week. [MUSIC PLAYING] The weekly show with John Stuart is a comedy central podcast. It's produced by Paramount Audio.

And bust boy productions. [MUSIC PLAYING] [MUSIC PLAYING]