Up First from NPR
Up First from NPR

Trump and Iran Talks, Iran Reacts to Ship Seized, Tariff Refunds

2h ago13:392,347 words
0:000:00

The U.S. fired on and seized an Iranian cargo ship that tried to break through the naval blockade. Iran calls it piracy and vows to retaliate with the ceasefire set to expire Wednesday. Iran is back t...

Transcript

EN

[MUSIC]

The U.S. fired on and seized an Iranian cargo ship that tried to break through the blockade. Iran is calling it piracy and vowing to retaliate. The ceasefire expires Wednesday and talks to extended or falling apart. >> I'm Michelle Martin, Vesley, Lafato and this is up first from NPR News. [MUSIC]

The seizure of the ship came just hours after President Trump confirmed U.S. negotiators would be headed to Pakistan for talks, but in Iranian officials says they are not attending. Both sides are accusing each other of violating the ceasefire. >> And good news for a lot of businesses impacted by President Trump's tariffs.

Today they can finally start applying for refunds on 166 billion dollars in taxes.

The Supreme Court said were collected illegally.

Stay with us, we'll give you the news you need to start your day.

[MUSIC] >> There's so much TV out there that we can't get to it all. >> Good stuff falls through the cracks. That's why we're recommending some great TV we missed. Find out what's good to watch on NPR's pop culture happy hour.

Listen via the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts. >> U.S. forces fired on an Iranian flaged cargo vessel after it refused to comply with a blockade ordered by President Trump.

He's sound from a video released by U.S. Central Command.

>> They hate our engine. We're prepared to reject you to the same line fire. [MUSIC] >> Marines ended up boarding the ship which is now in U.S. custody. It was the latest escalation in a weekend of rising tensions and renewed threats from Trump.

>> We are joined now by NPR senior political correspondent Tamara Keith to unpack all this. Good morning, Tim. >> Good morning. >> Okay, so the ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran is set to expire Wednesday.

But, and this feels like it's all falling apart, is it?

>> We'll find out, even before the U.S. took custody of that Iranian ship, President Trump and Iranian officials had been trading accusations about violating the ceasefire. Still, Trump announced that he was sending a team of negotiators to Pakistan today for in-person talks to end the war. White House official tells NPR the team will be led by Vice President JD Vance and

Midey Stonvoise, Steve Woodcoff, Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner. But as of this moment, Vance hasn't yet left Washington, and in that same social media post Trump announced the talks, he also issued new threats, quote, "We're offering a very fair and reasonable deal and I hope they take it because if they don't, the United States is going to knock out every single power plant and every single bridge in Iran, no more

Mr. Nice guy all caps exclamation point." >> I mean, if President Trump wants a deal so badly, why is he again threatening to bomb civilian infrastructure and targeting civilian infrastructure would be a war cry? He's trying to achieve maximum leverage with maximalist threats, but we've seen this movie

before. In fact, just two weeks ago, remember that Easter post about power plant and bridge

day, then with just 90 minutes before his self-imposed deadline, Trump announced the U.S. would agree to a ceasefire. That ceasefire is now getting close to expiring, and there's been very little visible progress towards a lasting peace deal. >> Okay, so if these negotiations happen, do you know what the Trump administration is looking to get out of them?

>> The president needs the straight-of-war moves reopened to stabilize oil markets, but it's a key piece of leverage Iran has gained in this war. Trump also set a red line at Iran's nuclear program. He doesn't want Iran enriching uranium and he wants to take possession of the material Iran still has, but also Trump is just looking for a way to declare a win and get out of this war. He's been claiming it was

nearly over four weeks now, but reality is a stubborn thing, and Iran gets a say in whether this conflict ends or not. What are the political consequences for Trump if this drags on? The average price of gas is hovering near $4 a gallon for regular. At an event last week, Trump said the high prices are "fake inflation," but it is real, and it is affecting

real people. I interviewed a Trump supporter who said he's basically stopped driving

his pickup truck because diesel prices are so high and has taken up fasting as a way to spend less on food. He trusts Trump to turn this around, but at some point, people are going to run out of patience. >> That's an NPR's tamarkey, thank you, Tim. You're welcome. The deadline is taking towards the end of the ceasefire between the US and Iran.

>> Talks that the US had been expecting in Pakistan are now in question after the US disabled in board of the cargo ship, the straight of her moves, and Iran said it retaliated.

>> For more, we go to NPR's "Jayner off" in our man, Jordan.

>> Hi, Lula.

>> Okay, so President Trump said Sunday that a US delegation was headed to Pakistan for

talks. What's the latest on the Iranian side?

>> Yeah. Well, Iran never confirmed that the talks would take place despite that announcement

that the US delegation was headed there. And this morning, it made everything pretty clear. The Iranian state news agency quoted a senior official saying, "We have no plans for the next round of negotiations." So that US seizure of the vessel, the container ship, played into that, of course, and then there was the Iranian drone attack in response to that. Iran said the US was clearly

not serious about negotiations, and especially after new threats by President Trump to bomb all power plants and bridges. It said all of this was intended to do what it called betrayed diplomacy. >> Iran, in this war, has used access through that strategic waterway, the state of her moves as leverage by restricting oil traffic. And then the US said, "Well, we'll block

it back. We're going to block H ships to and from Iran." Tell us more about the situation there. >> Yeah. Well, this yesterday, the US Navy disabled and then boarded an Iran named Flight Container Ship, Iran said it had been heading from China to Iran. This morning Iran called that action armed piracy and said it responded by firing drones at US military

warships. It gave no details, though, and the US military did not respond to a request for confirmation on the reported drone attack. Iran said it would have responded further, but it was concerned over crew members and families that are apparently on that vessel.

Okay, so get in all that you're describing here. What are the prospects for diplomacy?

>> Well, interestingly, Iran this morning also said that it's examining new US proposals. It said it received in recent days. There's no word from the US on what those were and Iran did not elaborate. But a senior Iranian national security official was quoted as saying, regarding the talks, that the US must accept the new system and the state of harm moves, that strategic waterway. And that new system is basically a structure of tolls that Iran

has tried to set up, which worked for a certain time in which it would allow transit through that straight that it controls if money were paid or if it aligned with its political interests. It also reiterated that a ceasefire in Lebanon is needed for any agreement to take place. And all of that, of course, is overshadowing the original US reason for going to war, which was reportedly to stop Iran's nuclear ambitions.

>> You mentioned a ceasefire in Lebanon, which is another front we've been following. Is it a invasion of Lebanon? What are the developments there? >> Yeah, that's a very fragile ceasefire. Israeli forces moved into the south with more than a million displaced and more than 1,000 Lebanese. Many of them civilians killed and what Israel says is its campaign against Hezbollah.

Israel says 16 of its soldiers have been killed. And this morning, Israel warned displaced villagers not to return.

It's important to remember, though, that most people have no homes to return to.

Israel has been destroying villages there to create what it calls the buffer zone. >> That's NPR-Jane Raf in our men. Thank you, Jane. >> Thank you. [MUSIC] >> This is the day a lot of US businesses have been waiting for.

They can finally ask the government to give back some of the 166 billion dollars in tariffs

that it collected illegally. >> Ever since this Supreme Court struck down those tariffs two months ago, importers have been wondering when they might get their money back. Customs officials have now set up an online system to process refund requests, and it is set to go live this morning.

>> And Pierscott, Horsley joins us now with the details. Good morning, Scott. >> Good morning. >> So, $166 billion, that's a lot of money that has to be repaid. How is this going to work? >> Yeah, it could be a scramble.

There's some 330,000 businesses that were wrongly forced to pay those tariffs. And a lot of them are going to be at their keyboards this morning looking for refunds. People like in this to try to get tickets to a hot concert or a sporting event. Jay Foreman runs a toy company that paid about $7 million in tariffs, and he is eager to get that money back.

>> I can tell you, as six people in our company will be having our hands on the trigger, and we'll push that button as soon as we see it. The process is supposed to be pretty straightforward, similar to what the customer's service does routinely, when they accompany over pay the tariff by mistake.

But, customers has never tried to repay this much money all at once.

>> Does the government have the bandwidth to handle all of these requests?

>> We will see, hopefully this will not be like the disastrous healthcare.

But there have concerns, even when the Supreme Court was hearing arguments in this case,

just as Amy Coney Barrett warned the refund process could be a mess.

In fact, in its decision, the high court did not even weigh in on whether or how refund should be repaid. It left that up to a specialty trade court. But the judge there Richard Eaton did not give the government any wiggle room. >> The laws clear, the duties were unlawful from the moment that they were imposed. That means that every single set of high-epid duties must be returned to the employer.

>> Iepa is the law that President relied on to impose these tariffs, but the Supreme Court said the law doesn't authorize that. Afterwards, Judge Eaton brushed aside arguments that tens of millions of tariff records would have to be manually reviewed. He said, "We live in the age of computers." And after some initial foot dragging, the government has actually moved pretty quickly to set up this streamlined refund system.

>> So how long is it going to take for businesses to get their money back?

>> Refunds are expected in 60 to 90 days. Now, some businesses with older and more complicated tariff situations are going to have to wait for a later phase to submit those requests.

But most are eligible in this first batch.

And Judge Eaton stressed that while there is some bureaucracy to navigate here, customs knows how to do this. I believe that there will be no chaos associated with the provision of these refunds, and that it will not result in a mess. >> Toy and Porter J. Foreman is also cautiously optimistic. He figures there might be some computer glitches, but ultimately, he's pretty confident his company will get the money is owed.

>> The Supreme Court of the United States of America, and the Court of International Trade, of said these tariffs are illegal. The money was taken illegally, and it needs to be refunded. And I firmly believe that will happen one way or another over time. >> By the way, after the Supreme Court struck down the President's emergency terrace, the administration imposed new tariffs using a different law.

Those are generally lower, and they're also time limited. But those new tariffs are also being challenged in court, and Jay Foreman is a part of that case. And PR Scott, Horsey, thank you, Scott, for your reporting. >> You're welcome.

>> Before you go, don't forget to tune into the Sunday Story right here on up first,

and PR Education Correspondent Corey Turner goes to Cedar Rapids, Iowa, to see how going all in on school choice is leaving some students behind. >> We've had two or three incidents where students start in another choice school in the in the city. I'm not going to name names, but within weeks they're back at our school. Across the country, parents are taking their kids out of traditional public schools,

and opting for private or charter schools instead.

>> I believe in the greater good, but my kids have to come first for me.

The greater good has to come second.

>> Listen now to the Sunday Story on the up first podcast from NPR. And that's up first for Monday, April 20th. I'm Le LaFaudsid. >> And I'm Michelle Martin. Today's episode of Up First was edited by Anna Yucananov, Ruth Sherlock, Rafael Nam, Muhammad, Elper, D.C. and Lindsay Totti. It was produced by Zia Gbuch and the Yudhumas.

Our director's Christopher Thomas, we get engineering support from Stacey Abbott and our technical director's Carly Strange. We hope you'll join us again tomorrow. (gentle music)

Compare and Explore