Macroaggressions
Macroaggressions

#626: Playing the Back Nine of the 2020’s

9d ago1:13:4711,624 words
0:000:00

The Trump Administration has announced its vision for America’s future in the second half of the decade, starting in 2026, and running beyond his presidency. Given the cast of characters comprising th...

Transcript

EN

It's all about the macro productions.

What is a goddamn wine-faytoni?

Please do not use gendered language. Then why? I'll be arrested! Put in airport jail! Well, you're going to lose sideways.

It's a big club. And you ain't in it. How bad is you?

Mr. Speaker, the president of the United States.

Hi, I'm Mr. Speaker. I'm Mr. Speaker. Jack Mary's Tech. There are tricks. I am sparkly Jackson Sacramento Heems.

Steven Subgolf. Thanks a finger guard. I'm Keith Morris. He's mold-like. Good job.

I'm Rick James. Yeah. Sorting through the lives. The hijackers passport was found blocks from the world Traps that are crash-side.

They can believe that. We cannot track 2.3 trillion dollars in transactions. And uncovering the centuries-long plan for world domination. It's about Cuba. Have it some food.

Hey pop back honey. Please. Have you ever been an animal in a Turkish prison? Ha ha ha ha. Where do you go?

Swaping more water. I have said six of my living missiles. To block the seas. Hardware. He flies to me.

I think it'll be more fun. I'll be jumping on a cliff. Two German by sexual assault. Oh, you English are so superior. Aren't you?

Thank you, Thomas. And now. Oh, macro aggressions. I thought I was all coming all the way. With your hopes.

Buddy, I don't know who you are. You're about to get clim media. Charlie Robinson. Hey, whitey. Where's your hat?

Wouldn't drop the blame on Charlie and say it's all Charlie's fault.

He was a retard. I get some goddamn guy already. Welcome to macro aggressions. I'm your host Charlie Robinson. If you're watching us on rumbleband.video, vigilante TV, YouTube or your listening

Webber podcasts or surf. Thanks a million.

We appreciate your amazing and continued support.

Macro aggressions.io is the website. You can check out what we're doing over there. Activistpost.com is where you can get your news. Appreciate our sponsors. Couldn't do it without them.

C60 power has been with me from the very beginning. My cat to wake me up at five o'clock in the morning. To get access to the good stuff. If you are interested in improving your energy. If you know a little bit of something about what the guys are over there at C60 power

are doing. Buckminster Fuller theorized about the carbon 60 molecule back in the 60s. The team discovered it in the 80s. They won the Nobel Prize for it. It's the most powerful anti-oxidant known to man.

It's hundreds of times more powerful than anything else out there. It is amazing. It's a spherical soccer ball type structure. It's a free radical sponge. It goes through your body.

Finding free radicals. Fixing them and resetting something does it over and over again. The time I had Christian Yordnevon. We went over my results of one of the tests I took with him. My DNA damage score was so low.

It didn't even have a number associated with it. That's from C60 power. If you're interested. If you're looking for a little bit more energy. You have aging pets or hell.

You're aging yourself. And you're interested. Go to shop. C60.com and use the discount code macro to save yourself a little bit of money. And if you're interested, go over and talk to our friends at Chemical Freebody as well.

Tim James and the crew over there. They've been doing it since I started over here. They've been with me. Green 85 is fantastic. I drink it every day.

If you haven't done the detox in a box, you should check that out.

That'll really lean you out. It's about a 90 day program. If you want something shorter, the parasite cleanse will get rid of all the critters that are in you. Go to chemicalfreebody.com/macro.

Check it out for yourself. Tim James and the crew. They're crazy about keeping chemicals out of their products. They do a great job of it. Go to chemicalfreebody.com/macro.

Check it out. See for yourself. All right.

Well, I was checking out what the Trump administration has planned for the second half of this

decade and it's not great. It's what they're planned for the Western Hemisphere. They have big ideas. Big ideas for Little Marco Rubio. Yep.

It's a weird cast of characters. It looks like kind of like the crew from the monsters who have occupied the oval office. And they have ideas. They have ideas for reimagining the way the American Empire deals with everyone else. Not everything in this document that they put forward is bad.

Right? Frankly, there's a couple of things on here that we need to get into that probably wouldn't

Be the worst thing for the American Empire to incorporate in.

So it's something called the U.S. Department of State strategic plan, 2026 to 2030. It's a document that they put forward. I read it so that you don't have to. You're welcome.

You start thinking, boy, I mean, it can't get any worse than the first half of this decade.

Right? We had COVID. We had all the insanity of D.I. and all that stuff. We had to go one direction down grocery store aisles and certainly not the wrong direction down there. You know, all that.

So if that was the first half of the decade, I'm not exactly looking forward to the second half.

I keep thinking, can't be worse, right? Right? I guess we'll see. But, but, but Donald Trump and Marco Rubio are the ones that are in charge of this. So I don't, I don't hold out hope that it's going to be awesome.

I do want to go over a little bit what the overview is and what the plan is. And what, well, do this. It's, we'll go through the six goals. They have six goals for this. They have goals.

They can have as many goals as they want, right?

If you have a 10 step plan to world domination,

but if they, if they can't figure out step one, step two, then doesn't really matter. So the, they have six goals. We'll talk about them. We'll get into goals and objectives, right?

This is what we're going to do. This is what we, we, there's our plan. This is how we're going to do it. This is how we're going to destroy the world in order to accomplish these goals. They don't put that in there.

Sort of the underlying theme, of course.

But they say this strategic plan outlines an American first foreign policy agenda,

emphasizing national sovereignty, you know, unless you're Venezuela or Greenland, then you're fucked. But for everybody else, it's national sovereignty, domestic renewal, and pragmatic diplomacy. So what they say is that the US national interests are going to take

priority from 2026 onward, you know, you know, unless it's Israel's priority, then that will take priority. Because Israel is in charge of this whole thing. And when you, if you don't think so, Donald Trump and Marco Rubio, the people who are behind this document

are 100% owned by Israel. So they can talk about how this is the goal number one is US national sovereignty. But it's all talk. Because if we were actually getting down to the nuts and bolts of this, you would recognize that the US is no longer sovereign.

It's been compromised, it's been taken over by a parasite entity. And they go on to talk about how America first means, every policy will be evaluated by direct benefits to US interests. Again, America first should be America first, right? It should be direct benefits to US interests.

We've been talking about America first for a while, but I don't think anybody who's paying attention actually thinks

that that's what's going on, especially here in America.

We see what is happening. America, America first, America last, Israel first, and followed closely behind by every undocumented Tom Dick and Navier who's walked here from French Guyana, you know what I mean? This is most definitely not America first.

It's everybody else first, but they're going to change that. That's what they say. They can say a lot, and they do. So let's talk about goals. We'll start with goal number one, US national sovereignty.

They're talking about this means a reassertion of national control over borders, laws, and international commitments. That's great. We're going to have national control over our borders. What a novel concept.

It's been a while to be clear. It's been a while since we've had this.

This will be revolutionary if we were actually able to re-assert

national control over the borders and the laws in America. It would be unrecognizable, but they say they're going to do it, guys. So of course they're going to do it. Just go hold your breath, trust the plan, go wait in the corner. It's all kind of.

Patriots are in control. Talking about what they want to do is they want to protect citizens' rights from foreign interference and reform engagement with international organizations. Okay, so I don't, what does that mean really? What they say is, okay, we're going to end the era of mass migration through strict

visa issuance. Hmm, interesting. We're going to treat immigration as a national security decision.

I'm sorry, you mean it wasn't?

Some of this is kind of like head scratching.

You go, we're going to start taking immigration seriously. It's like, you start, you're going to start doing it. What about all the other people who thought you were taking it seriously for like, I don't know, the last 250 years. Well, well, we were just practicing.

Now we're going to take it seriously, guys. We want to negotiate with foreign governments about repatriation of foreigners. Okay, we've got a bunch of your people here from Guatemala. Would you like them back? No, they're like, no, it's fine.

We have to eat our insane silence and send them to you. No, we don't want them back. We want to prevent visa holders from public support. Prevent visa holders from public support. They don't want, they don't want you to come here on a visa.

And during the visa interview process, they say, well, what would you like to do in the United States while you're here? What is the purpose of your visit and the reason for this visa? You're not supposed to say, I'm coming here because I heard they're given away free stuff. That's not the answer that they want. So they want to prevent the visa holders from getting free public support.

I just, again, I wonder, but this wasn't an idea that you had decades ago.

This is the first time it's crossing your mind.

You know what we should do with all these people that are coming across the border. We should prevent them from getting free welfare and stuff like that. Holy shit, you think so? That's amazing.

You should, you guys should put that into a document.

And then some dipshit will have to do a podcast episode about it. It would be amazing. Foreign assistance money as they're talking about using foreign assistance money as leverage for immigration cooperation. What a novel idea. We've got all of these people from the Democratic Republic of Chad, right?

And so, and maybe before we send the check to the Democratic Republic of Chad for 80 bazillion dollars or whatever we give them every year. Why don't we say to them, hey, hey, you know that money that we normally give you? You got to come, we get to give you all your people back that you smuggled into our country. We're going to send them back and, and, by the way, until we get a handle on that, we're not going to give you the money that we just give you out of, you know, for existing, right?

So use foreign assistance money as leverage for international cooperation.

I don't never thought of that.

That's it. That's a good idea. Put a gold star next to that one, guys. Once you have secured the borders, then protect Americans rights from foreign interference. You know, unless it's Israel.

They can be interfered with it, they can interfere with us all they want, right? So they go, oh, well, we'll do, we'll counter foreign laws and regulations that restrict Americans free speech and religious liberties. Unless they're Christians.

I added that last part, unless they're Christians, but, but that's what's going on, right?

So it's like, all of you people in Europe who are doing the wrong thing with your immigration. Stop that. Uh, we, you, and, and stop them with the, the anti free speech stuff, all that, section 230 and all the internet stuff that you guys are going on and on about Elon Musk, stop that and, and how you're clamping down on religious liberties, stop that, right?

Unless you're murdering Christians, then it's totally fine. Opposed global campaigns against hate speech or disinformation that limits the rights of Americans. There is no such thing as hate speech. It's just speech that you hate. It's not a legal definition that doesn't carry any weight, right?

So global campaigns against hate speech and disinformation. Let me guess, the ADL and Southern Poverty Law Center behind that. They want you to, to go on these campaigns against hate speech. What are they saying? Are they saying hateful things? No, they're just saying things that you would hate to hear.

But, um, about what you guys are doing. So they go on to say investigate foreign influence operations. Foreign, investigate foreign influence offer. I can save you the trouble. Why don't you lock up the guys at Jonathan Greenblatt at the ADL

to get Mark Potak from the Southern Poverty Law Center when she put those guys in handcuffs. It's start there. This isn't hard. A black foreign acquisition of assets important to national security.

Why are there foreign acquisitions of assets that are important in national security?

Why are you allowing the Chinese to buy farmland inside America? Why? We need the money. We're selling the farms now. It sounds like a bad idea. Goal, one objective three.

Selective multilateral engagement. They say fund international organizations only when they benefit US interests.

Well, that's common sense, right?

Here's something that I actually agree with these lunatics on.

Opposed the UN's agenda 2030 and the 17 sustainable development goals. Good. Good. We need to stop that. 100%. This is what's interesting with with.

You know, there's a tendency to think that like this new world order group is a homogenous.

That they all want one thing or it's this group versus nobody else, right?

It's just one group versus the people. It's really not the case. There are factions fighting. The Trump group does not have much love for the United Nations, which is fine. I mean, they shouldn't, of course. But it is a bit surprising because it's been hard to find any of this divergence away from that.

That's part of the reason why the establishment hates Trump so much. You know, because that United Nations Rockefeller group has been in charge for a long time. And when you talk about opposing the UN's agenda 2030 and the 17 SDGs, you are right for opposing that. This absolutely should happen.

But it catches you off guard because you never really hear American presidents criticizing the United Nations.

You always just hear them going along with whatever they have to say. Well, that's because it's a Rockefeller organization. So he's right, you know, I mean, I don't want to, you know, I give Trump credit where credit is due. It's he'll get very little of it from me.

But stepping up and saying that you need to oppose the United Nations really at every level.

They mentioned this with agenda 2030 and the 17 SDGs. But it's, you know, it's more than just that. It's also Trump has been very critical about the World Health Organization as well. Of course, that is part of the Rockefeller network. And it's in the United Nations umbrella.

So, and once again, right for pushing the World Health Organization out, they are a criminal enterprise. So he goes on to say that they want to block resolution undermining the US or their allies interests. What resolution would that be? Would it be like resolutions where you found like the head of your favorite country, is guilty of being a war criminal in the international criminal court.

You mean that? Because because there's, there's resolutions out there all over the place that are criticizing some of America's allies. But it's usually just that one out in the Middle East, the one that's supposed to be our best friend. I bet they do, I bet, see, part of the reason why Trump is so pro Israel, the United Nations for all their flaws has a huge problem with Israel. You know, that you'll see like every single country will vote one way except for the two would be the US and Israel.

And some of these like satellite nations in the Micronesia, like in the South Pacific that are like, Vanuatu or some shit hole like that that's just been totally captured. Vill vote in favor of Israel as well. But, but everyone else will vote against it. And so I'm sure Trump sees that and they go, "Oh, we got to get rid of this United Nations."

And they're the ones that are constantly talking about how Israel is doing the wrong thing. Can't have that. Well, in this particular case, it's possible that the United Nations could be a globalist terrorist organization held bent on destroying the world. And also be correct in their assessment of Israel. So, so they also talk about winding down costly peacekeeping missions.

Yeah, you think so, like NATO, we could do that. We'll get into that a little bit more. Goal too, Western Hemisphere, and the Don Road doctrine. The core theme, re-asserting US dominance in the Americas by expelling foreign adversaries, strengthening regional partnerships, and eliminating Narco terrorist organizations. That last part.

About the eliminating Narco terrorist organizations, you guys know that's not going to happen, right?

The American Empire is never going to get serious about removing the Narco terrorist organizations from the world because we are the Narco terrorist organizations around the world.

The central intelligence agency, the CIA, is the largest drug running operation in the planet. They have financed their operations for decades doing things like this in Southeast Asia and Afghanistan. This is a well-known thing. The idea that the Trump administration is going to come in and remove the Narco terrorist organizations is either delusional thinking or it's just for sound bite, because it's not actually going to happen. Part of the reason is that the president who came before you, George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton, were running that organization.

They will not allow this to go away.

The ghost of George H. W. Bush will haunt Donald Trump, and of course Bill Clinton may be a walking corpse these days.

But I didn't get to where he is by not knowing what's going on or falling off a turn-up truck. That guy was running cocaine into the United States in plain loads full, okay?

So there's not going to be the end to the Narco terrorist organizations. There will only be an end to the Narco terrorist organizations who aren't fully under the thumb of the CIA. So I can see that happening. They go on to say prevent extra hemispheric powers, especially China, from establishing military bases or economic control. Yeah, that's our job. School of the Americas. You might be familiar with that. Operation Condor. We took control of South America in the early 70s or at least we didn't want the commies to get what you get there. So the idea of establishing military bases or economic control.

This is not revolutionary. This is not a new idea. This is something that's been going on for a long time. By the way, we do have military bases there.

Recover control of strategic choke point, such as the Panama Canal. Yes, this isn't, this is a, this is a no-brainer. The problem is

America didn't go in and take control of the Panama Canal away from the Chinese and give it to the Americans. They gave it to Blackrock. So it's not like America is in control of the Panama Canal anymore. No. Blackrock is, and that group is sort of a mishmash of Israel and America, but it's not America. So they didn't solve the problem by taking away the Panama Canal from the Chinese and giving it to the Americans. They changed the problem. He goes on to talk about the need to sever foreign debt traps and predatory loans with neighbors. Well, we would know about that.

That is from confessions of an economic hitman by John Perkins. He talked about this. In fact, John and I have talked about the third edition of his book, where they mentioned the Chinese economic hitman moving into South America. We talked about that on the show. It's, it's not that American empire is some source of, of good. Who's coming to wave about magic wand and remove these debt traps from these poor third world countries that have been enslaved with predatory loans by, by groups like the Chinese.

No, no. They're going to just replace them with their own predatory loans, proctue by the World Bank. Right. Maybe not the World Bank in this case because World Bank is part of the United Nations Rockefeller group. So there may be a different bank in its place, but that's the point is that it's not that America wants to free South America from the shackles of this debt slavery.

It's that they want to replace them with their own chains. Right. And that's what they'll do.

They talk about blocking adversaries from controlling critical infrastructure via state-link private entities.

When I hear state-linked private entities, my mind goes to fascism because that's what it is. It's also pretty much like what you get in the end of empire with Soviet Union. What did you have state-linked private entities that were controlling certain regions and even take the copper industry or the nickel industry, Robyn Abrahamov comes in and next thing you know, he's dealing with aluminum and the tin and you know, and so you go, okay. So you start divying up these things. So it's not so much that they're state-controlled, right?

It's not the United States Empire. It's not the Russian government or in this case it's not the Venezuelan government, right?

But it's state-linked private entities. So it's the businesses that are connected to the state. And if you're a business who is connected to the state, that's fascism. The blending of big business with the state for the benefit of the state is the definition of fascism. Same thing, but with the benefit being towards the corporations, that's corporatism. And so in this case, Trump is looking at this as a business opportunity.

He's looking at, at this as saying, we want to control critical infrastructure via state-linked private entities. Now, we can't just go in there, plant an American flag and take all your cobalt, though we would want to. We can't do that. We can't go into Venezuela and say America is going to take over Venezuela, but we can put Chevron in there or Chevron's already there. But you can continue to allow these companies. So, you know, we're getting back in, we're going into the Smedley Butler Wars racket mentality, right?

Of course he would, he would have known, talking about this stuff, United Fru...

Right? It's not a word of ideology.

It's a war to allow us to sell our bananas in your supermarkets. You understand?

This is what, nothing, you may be dismissive of this and think, oh, they would never do that.

Now, this is how it is done. The American Empire, the war machine, is used at the behest of for banks and multinational corporations that need this to happen. They need South America to be a better place for them to run their businesses. Well, you send in the American wrecking ball to take out your, anybody that opposes you. Moving on to this objective two goal to strengthen regional partnerships that talk about providing commercial and security alternatives to China.

China was here. China was doing a lot for South America, but China's gone now. We got to get rid of them. So, we're going to have to provide some options instead of that, right?

So, you used to sell your oil to your Venezuela and oil to China, but we can't have that anymore.

So, we have to take Maduro out of power. We, the American Empire not me, have to take Maduro out. And then, all of a sudden, we will then prioritize trade deals within, you know, within our Western Hemisphere.

We'll make sure that we're, we're providing security and commercial alternatives to China, right?

The, the one thing was Venezuela used to sell all your oil to China. We would like, you would like to do that still, but you didn't recognize Israel. Now, now that Maduro is gone, what does Venezuela do? Venezuela does not sell oil to China anymore. And they don't sell oil to Cuba any longer. We told them they're not allowed to.

And guess what they do? They recognize Israel, so they sell oil to Israel now.

Replacing China in Israel is not in that country's best interest. I assure you, but it's happening anyway. So, they're going to prioritize trade deals within the Western Hemisphere, okay? And they're going to onshore key industries to neighboring countries with comparative advantages. What that means is that, sure, China used to make all the pharmaceuticals, but now you're, we're not going to do that. So, we've decided that, oh, I don't know, Honduras is now going to make the pharmaceuticals get ready.

And we need to onshore key industries and, and to to our neighboring countries, then make sure that they have comparative advantages. Now, we're not going to onshore the pharmaceutical manufacturing to the US because we still have a bunch of rules and regulations we can't get around, right? But do we have a country that's kind of like China, you know, the rules are written in pencil and we can make it like sure. If it's so maybe they just say close their eyes point on the map and go Honduras, right?

Welcome, welcome to the pharmaceutical industry Honduras. You've been slated by the American Empire to now start making these.

And so that's what they're talking about. They're talking about making a calculation that some of the stuff that you used to get was from China.

But China is going to be gone now. And, and so you're going to have to find a different way of doing that. So, restore neglected allies to their proper strategic role. Tired of being China's bitch, you can be America's bitch instead. They go on to say objective three, suppress narco terrorist organizations. Okay, they're going to, they're going to suppress narco terrorist organizations. By the way, if you want to make real money in the world and keep your business going for

400 years, like the British East India company that, you know what your industry, you're going to need to get into narcotics. You got it. You got to get into moving drugs and moving people. If you want to make a lot of money. So, the idea that they're going to come in and suppress narco terrorist organizations is delusional, magical thinking. You're going to go in and work with narco terrorist organizations because you already currently do work with them through the CIA. So, what you're saying is that

you're going to pick winners. You're going to pick this cartel stays in business. We're going after that other cartel, you know, sent a lower cartel or whoever. Isn't willing to play ball. They'll be the boogie man. We'll take their guy and put him in some super max facility somewhere and say, see, we got, we got to a meanwhile, there will be other cartels working with the US empire to make sure that the drugs continue to flow because the drugs are going to continue to flow.

Right. If you are running America, there's this, you know, you can give the talk to everybody that we're going to try and remove drugs from the country. You don't want Americans to come off drugs.

If all Americans came off their drugs at the same time, you'd have a bigger p...

You need the pharmaceutical drugs to keep everybody from becoming insanely crazy. And you need the recreational drugs to keep everybody down on the reservation to keep from slitting your throats. So, drugs are necessary. Drugs are not a bad thing. Drugs are going to be here. Okay. Be the pharmaceutical kind or the known form. It's going to happen. The idea that they're

going to suppress narko terrorist organizations, that sounds good. It looks amazing in this document that you

guys don't have to read anyone. And it sounds amazing when you do when you stand in front of the podium and give the speech how you're going to stop this. But it's not really going to happen. They say they're going to designate cartels and gangs that's foreign terrorist organizations. Why, so you can give them money and arms. And it's what you do with other foreign terrorists.

Are you going to are you going to create them out of thin air?

Finance them into existence and then have them start wars in Middle East. That'd be hilarious. I mean, we've already been doing that. You're going to designate them as a foreign terrorist organization. With the other foreign terrorist organizations, maybe they should learn from the M.E.K. or whoever it was, the group that was on the foreign terrorist organization watched list. And then I think stole a cargo ship, sold all the contents, raised the money that way.

And then used the money to pay the Trump organization and enough money to get off the terrorist. I think that's coming. That's the future of South America with the Don Road doctrine. You'll eventually, at some point, we will call you a terrorist organization. Put sanctions on you. And then you will just have to go out there and make some money to bribe the government officials.

Then get you off of the list. There's a great system. It works very, works amazing.

Let's move on. Go on number three. Peace and stability in the Indo Pacific region. Guys, the American Empire wants peace and stability, don't you know? It's just love it. Managing competition with China through economic reinvestialization, strengthen the alliances and military deterrence. To catch the word, re-industrialization.

The re-part is important. You can be tarded, but are you re-tarded, and you can be industrialized, but are you re-industrialized, right?

Because that's what they're saying. We got to re-industrialize America, the American Empire. That implies that at one point it was industrialized and that we did something. Yeah, Bill Clinton did that in the 90s with NAFTA, and he outsourced and moved all of the manufacturing capacity of America out of America and into Mexico and China. So now we have to re-industrialize through commercial advocacy and secure supply chains. That's what he's talking about. Well, we wouldn't have to re-industrialize if you hadn't de-industrialized this 30 years ago.

All part of a plan wasn't Bill Clinton's idea. Of course, it wasn't like he just woke up into the water. No, this is coming from on high. So when I hear talk of the supporting US re-industrialization through commercial advocacy and securing supply chains, my mind immediately goes to what this is our version of the Belt and Road initiative. I mean, it has to be, right?

It's starting to make that calculation that the way Asia and Middle East and Eastern Europe are having this amazing Belt and Road, not just the maritime string of pearls,

but also what's going on across land with the rails and freeways and highways that are being built there. There's a lot going on.

I think the United States feels like it's being left behind.

It's been so busy spending trillions of dollars re-imagining the Middle East for their controllers and Israel that they've forgotten what made America the economic powerhouse it was from the beginning. So this idea that we're going to have to re-industrialize and we're going to have to support this commercial advocacy and improve our supply chains. Yeah, of course. That should go without saying. Have you taken a look around America? It's a shithole. It's a third world shithole country. It's turning into one.

The infrastructure is a catastrophe. So yeah, we need our version of the Belt and Road Initiative. If for no other reason, it just fixed the ports, airports, rail, any of the infrastructure inside America needs to be redone.

They want to combat Chinese intellectual property theft and predatory economi...

Yeah, Chinese economic proof.

IP theft has been going on for a long time. And it's not limited to China.

Sure, they're doing it on a just simply staggering scale. But again, let's not pretend like these railies didn't sell that technology to China. They've been involved in doing this for a long time. See how it works is this.

American politicians get compromised because they're shitheads and they wind up in these really bad situations.

They then make decisions that give their handlers, the Israelis, all the things that they want. They have made decisions in the past who give Israelis the sort of information that intellectual property that then they use and have the child and sell to the Chinese, the Chinese manufacturer things. And so American intellectual property, he's correct and saying that they need to combat Chinese theft of it.

But it's not limited to the Chinese. And this entire document needs the big answers at the front and says, yeah, some results may vary.

Right, Israel not included, you know, whatever.

Objects in the mirror may appear closer than they actually are, especially if they're Israel.

So, you know, I get this that they want to combat Chinese IP theft and it's not not for nothing. There's a need for that. But this, you know, that they pretend that this is the only version of it is kind of delusional. They say they want to pursue high impact bilateral trade deals with regional allies. Well, trade deals work better with your regional allies when you aren't bombing the shit out of them or terrifying them or trying to regime change their their government.

They want to secure critical minerals through innovative deals, innovative deals, meaning we steal all your stuff. I believe I believe that's how anybody's talking about secure critical minerals through innovative deals.

You have critical minerals. Our innovative deal is this. We will bomb the shit out of you unless you allow our companies to go in there and mine your critical minerals and sell them at market and give you pennies on the dollar. That's kind of what we're talking about here. And there's also something to use of the quadrilateral security dialogue to counter Chinese exclusionary systems. They want, they want the Chinese out. And they want the American influence in. Okay, objective two to turn aggression and establish military balance military balance.

So they say we want to counter China's military build up through allied coordination and we want to secure vital ceilines and trade routes. Okay, establishing military balance. The terms military and balance should not be in the language of the American empire. We don't have military balance. If if the American empire's military is balanced, then they've done something wrong because you spend a trillion dollars a year on your military. It shouldn't be balanced. It should be massively imbalanced against everybody else. When you spend more money than the entire world combined on military balance should not be part of the formula.

But they want it. He wants balance for some reason. He encourages allies to increase defense spending and give US military greater access. Oh, we need you guys to buy our weapons because if you don't, the boogie man's going to get you. Like, well, we've been here for, I don't know, a thousand years in the boogie man hasn't gotten us. We didn't have a needed to buy your weapons. Well, I'll tell you what. If you tell the American empire that you don't need to buy their weapons because there are no boogie men coming to get your country, I assure you the boogie men will appear.

To give you the justification to then buy those weapons. If you don't understand that, then you don't understand how the game works. Right. That's that's a nice flower shop you got here. Be ashamed of something bad happened to it. Right. They want to provide allies access to revitalize US defense industrial base by more bombs from us and drones by the way. They say revitalize US defense industrial base. What that means is we are now going to make the drones. Or we feel like we have to make the drones. That would be why you would look at a company like Andrewl with a lucky Palmer and take a look at what they're doing over there.

If you want to see drones, drones that you can launch from the back of a Toyo...

That's there. Right. So I don't know how much of this is going to need to be made in China anymore. In fact, I think they're making a calculation that it can't be made in China.

Also maintain open communication channels with China to reduce misunderstandings. Yeah, yeah, misunderstandings. Meaning we don't want them to start the war until we're ready for them for us to start the war. Right. Moving on to goal for rebuild the civilizational alliance with European states.

Are you going to be friends with Europe now, do you?

Core theme, empower European allies to become self-sufficient in defense while rebalancing trade and defending shared Western values shared Western values shared Western values like importing the third world in. Is that a shared Western value that is not actually a shared Western value. I think what he's talking about here is we let go back to the old ways where Western values meant that they're weren't. You know a steady stream of young men from Senegal walking into your country and setting up shop.

And they want to rebalance trade and how are we going to objective one in order to do this transfer defense responsibility to allies. Okay.

This part is where Trump sets his side on Europe in this document and he says, basically, you guys need to spend 5% of your GDP on defense.

All you NATO allies, you need to spend contribute 5% of your GDP towards NATO for defense. You're currently not doing that.

You have picks up more than 50% of the bill for NATO. The other countries aren't contributing much. And what he's saying is, you better you need to. He goes on to say, support NATO as a mechanism for deterrence, but demand real contributions. You guys better be contributing money to this. And if he doesn't see that, he's going to have an out. I American needs to get out of NATO. It shouldn't exist. It's a relic of the past. It should have gone away when the Warsaw Pact went away in '91. But it didn't. It's still here. And it's the world, the precursor of the world army, right?

And Europe has been using NATO for a long time. We've talked about gladio. We know what it is. We know what it's used for. And it's become a bit outdated and it has no relevance. I don't think Russia is terrified of NATO.

I think they're scared that the United States is part of it. And with Article 5, if one guy and the gang gets in a fight, the entire gang has to jump in. It's required by law.

So it's not so much that Russia looks at NATO and is like NATO is a formidable force to be reckoned with. It's like, no, America is. If America left NATO, well, NATO wouldn't exist, right? If America left NATO and went off to do a ton thing, and then missiles started flying on Brussels and turned that into a smoldering parking lot, I don't think that Russia would fear the rest of NATO's retaliatory actions about them. I don't think NATO scares Russia at all. As long as America is not a part of it. And you can see how Donald Trump is not a fan of NATO. He's not into this. He's talking about advocating for tangible military capabilities as Europe assumes conventional defense responsibilities. He's telling them, we're going to be leaving. You better know how to take care of yourself because we're out of here.

And really, the whole reason for NATO and gladio was to prevent the mission creep of the Soviet Union. We're not totally done. Yeah, we stopped here halfway through Germany, but we may go the rest of the way. We may continue Western. So you create NATO as this thing that keeps the Russians out, the Americans in and the Germans down. And so that's going away. And it seems like it's going away. I hope it goes away.

Should have gone away three decades ago, but better late than never. I think that Trump is getting tired of paying the bills.

Right, so he's telling them, you got to kick in. He says, I want to end the Russia Ukraine war. I want to negotiate arms control for nuclear, chemical and biological weapons and be done with it. Right, I don't know. We'll see. Objective two. Rebalance trade and reduce adversarial dependencies. Again, this is Back to the EU. He's saying, we need reciprocal trade with you guys. The trade balances out of whack.

We want America to have a different relationship with trade.

That's about promoting US energy exports national natural gas. We need to push natural gas to to the EU.

Well, you know, it's it's way easier for the American Empire to push the need for natural gas when you blow up the Nord Stream pipeline. That was bringing in natural gas from Russia, Germany and elsewhere. And you blow that up. And then all of a sudden, now you don't have the access to that. So you're going to have to get it from somewhere, where you're going to get it from America. And how much you're going to pay? Probably triple. But at least you won't be buying it from the Russians, you know, because they're awful and they're evil. Right.

The news told me so he wants to support efforts to reduce European reliance on China for critical supply chains and things like that.

He wants this, this is a funny one. He's telling Europe, you need to remove Chinese hardware and software from European critical infrastructure.

I mean, it's one thing if it's a suggestion, but he's like, hey, you need to do this. New Europe, like we have a we America have a problem with China. So you Europe, you need to take all the Chinese hardware and software out of your infrastructure.

Europe's like, fuck, we will. I'm like, we don't have we don't have to do anything. Like who are you to tell us that we have to do all this?

So it's funny that they want they desperately want the Chinese software out of this. I wonder why? Because you know what you would do if you had compromised software, right? Like kind of the way the CIA did that to Chernobyl back in 86 or previous.

Actually, when they built the plant, when they made sure that the Soviet stole the blueprints for the intellectual property, all this technology to build infrastructure, build nuclear power plants and build them with flaws in them, right?

I'm sure America knows what they've done to the Soviet Union and they went, fuck, you know, if the Chinese are doing this with their infrastructure, like with their software, if they put compromised hardware or compromised software into the infrastructure of Europe. It's like a ticking time bomb may go off. Who knows, ten years from now, twenty years from now, four months from now, you never know. That by the way was the one thing. They said that in the aftermath of the Soviet Union figuring out that the Chernobyl plant was a US, you know, the operation that we've done this work on this before.

They set up the Soviet Union to steal the plans that had the flaw in it and they did it and they built it. It wasn't so much that that one power plant was built with faulty flaws. It's that the Soviet Union knew that they had stolen a shitload of other ones and built this throughout their country and they didn't know what was what. And so the American Empire is looking at this and they're going, you and Europe need to remove all the Chinese software that you've got in your infrastructure because if you're running some water treatment facility that's using a Chinese micro processor.

That thing may have been compromised ten years ago set to once it hits the one millionth revolution of this, it drops into some different sequence and next thing you know your water treatment facility starts overheating and the whole thing blows up right.

They know that's why they're talking about this objective three goal for defense civilization values this one is almost to and to funny to talk about condemn restrictions on free speech and religious freedom in Europe.

The irony like America is like hey you people in Europe need to tone down your your opposition to free speech meanwhile Trump administration is trying to find ways that you can eliminate criticism of Israel from social media or even prevent you from having the thought. And that guy over there was thinking about it let's put him in a insane asylum so the idea that like the American empires like hey we need to go handle on this all these suppression of free speech it's like please stop. We have to oppose law fair used to ban political opponents again this is pure theater this is accuser enemies of that which you yourself are guilty of support European nations in recognizing mass migration as a threat.

Well, yeah, it is a threat it's called the Colergy plan the group who is putting the Colergy plan into play are the Israelis and the is and we know this because they talk openly about it right I'm not speculating about that they talk about it right so the group who is running Donald Trump. And creating the havoc the southern border situation in America the what's going on in Western Europe coming up from from North Africa through Turkey.

This is all being done by the people who control Trump so the idea that Trump...

Okay fine maybe European nation will recognize mass migration as a threat doesn't mean they have to do anything about it.

The five let's move on to this one US economic and technological dominance so they want to rebuild American manufacturing. They want to correct unfair trade practices and they want to ensure global leadership in critical technologists well that's easy to do. Find Doc Brown. Get in the delorean set it for 1995 Kill Bill Clinton before he can institute NAFTA and you'll win and then this will all be done because all the things that they want to do here is shit that we should have not done in the mid 90s and then you wouldn't have to fix all these issues they would have been non issues right so.

Reindustrialize the United States secure supply chains from dependence on adversaries right you can't.

Be dependent on China for 97% of your pharmaceuticals and then go to war against China because all the Americans will be coming off of their anti psychotics at the same time. So you need to plan accordingly right you said we get 95% of the rare earth minerals are all refined in China and we have to have rare earth minerals will then either don't start a war with China or have the refinement situation figured out in advance but what you don't want to do is start the war with China and then go oh shit I forgot we need rare earth minerals and you're like yeah well we have them here okay.

But yeah, but we need to refine them oh shit man you should have told us that before we drop the bombs because all the refineries are in China so if you need us to refine it we're going to now need to create.

The industry of refining rare earth and the whole thing would be a mess right so you have to think about the stuff in advance and so again if you're if you're talking about showing up supply chain chains from. And making sure that they're more Western hemisphere dependent you go okay. So why would you be doing that I guess it's a good thing right but why would you be doing that maybe because you plan to start problems in either China or the Middle East.

You're showing up your your oil and gas and you're taking over Venezuela so that you have crude and you're taking over Nigeria so that you have oil as well both of those.

Regents no issues with maritime choke points right Venezuela is just straight shot north Nigeria straight shot west you'll you'll run right into Houston both cases right so those are you take care of that if you planned on having problems in the Middle East if you planned on going to war with China. You would show up your supply chains to make sure that you didn't you no longer needed things that you currently need from China so they're talking about this which makes me think that eventually there will be a war with China.

Because. Well I'll tell you this maybe there will be maybe there won't be but if if you were going to have a war with China. These are the things that you would do in advance of that so we'll leave it at that and and not put that out into the universe that there's going to be a war it's just this is these are the things that you would do.

If you were going to get ready for a war. To focus on strategic sectors they talk about energy critical minerals.

AI semi-conductors advance manufacturing aerospace robotics pharmaceuticals biotech quantum science so anything that's currently being outsourced to Asia. You got to kind of on shore that or at the very least you got to have good relationships like you can have the relationship we have with Taiwan right they make semi-conductors there like if China goes away then we have Taiwan but what if Taiwan gets taken well then that's a problem right and if everything runs on semi-conductors.

You have to be thinking a couple steps ahead you have to be thinking decades ahead in fact because.

These aren't the types of refineries and decisions that get made overnight these this takes a while so rebuilding the defense industrial base and promote it to its allies are talking about military industrial complex making sure that you're not buying weapons from. Europe you're buying weapons from America or China you're not you're certainly not buying weapons from China but but because everything will now have to be made in America and they talk about this creating an economic block. Pro American countries using American technology and export so we need a you know the way everyone in NATO uses 5.562 rounds right and everybody in Warsaw uses 7.62 so you need a group you need to create a block of pro American countries using American technology and America exports and then you just kind of work on that group and make sure that they continue to be.

Pro American technology you flood them with everything that they need so that...

They go on to stop the to talk about objective to stop abuse of the global trading system they say to correct trade deficits throughout res through using reciprocal tariffs Trump spent all over the tariffs if he's been talking about it. That's since he got back in the office this is kind of what it's about part of it at least combat unfair practices trade tariffs import substitutions currency manipulation 20 we're complaining about unfair practices like currency manipulation we the American Empire that uses the American dollar we're going to complain about currency manipulation amazing right.

They talk about how if these countries in the western hemisphere fail to pay their value added tax the VAT the American Empire will impose punitive tariffs of 40% or more on them so they're already talking about the carrot and the stick.

The stick being 40% tariffs and they're not afraid to use that they're talking about making commercial diplomacy the centerpiece of economic strategy.

We just want to open up the we just want to open up the world for business for the American Empire except China and except Europe. This one opened up the western hemisphere we want to slid our throat by giving us only access to about 25% of the world. In terms of population more like only about 10%. I don't know are we winning are we winning guys doesn't feel like he he goes on to say that business advocacy is the central tool of foreign policy. Well you had just asked medley butler you could talk to you about that goal five objective three increase us exports and strategic investment.

They want to promote American exports in AI American exports in energy we could be an energy exporter if we chose to be we have a ton of energy here and he maybe he will promote the exports of that.

He's talking about definitely promoting the weapon systems and this is he's Trump vans he's himself the biggest. You know gun dealer in the world. He talks about promoting American capital markets and American manufacturing advanced manufacturing and things like that. Well I mean promoting the American capital markets are you talking about the US dollar because it felt like you guys weren't even interested in preserving the petro dollar. Irving the petro dollar anymore you allowed Saudi Arabia to kind of move off of that and the capital markets you mean like the like we've seen you've done with other markets like comx and forex you've riggle.

You rig all the marketplaces so I don't know the idea of like. Promoting American capital markets like.

This has been going on for 50 years with the petro dollar I don't know how much you need to promote the problem is that.

The American capital markets are just. Dangerous places to to do business. I mean under the rest of the world took note. When the American empire stole the $300 billion of Russian money that was their liquidity pool. In what in doing that it now it's 300 billion dollars is a hell of a lot of money. But even if it was a hundred million dollars.

The idea that the American empire would do that is crazy and it shows that they can't be trusted that it's a new era where well you know they might.

Yeah it's Russia today and we got a problem with Russia right apparently and they'll take their money but that's Russia right but they would never do that to it.

Well I don't know don't be so sure because. If they'll do it to Russia they'll do it to anybody and I think that this is part of. The sales pitch of like. Promoting American capital markets but he's going to have a lot of you know it's going to be an uphill battle because. The worst advertising campaign for American capital markets happen when the Biden administration authorized. To steal the Russian money.

When you did that you sent a signal to the rest of the world that we are a banana republic and that you used to be that you could trust.

But now you have to think twice about it.

He wants to expand US energy production. He wants to export a ton of energy to achieve energy dominance. Whatever that means. I think I mean something different to him than. Does the other people you want to ensure the US dollar remains the global reserve currency.

And when he says US dollar.

What he means is the federal reserve note.

Just in a US dollar it's backed by nothing.

Back by private banks owned by a consortium of other private banks mostly owned in Europe. That's our banking system. So and he wants to control an export American AI tech. To trusted partners only. And I'm assuming that trusted partners only means Israel.

Right. And maybe anybody who pays us. I don't know. The idea that we're going to control the export of American artificial intelligence technology. I think that horses left the stable.

I just don't understand how you think you're going to get a handle on this. But again, I'm going to try to get into the mind of. President Trump and little Marco Rubio, but.

I think some of this is aspirational and not anchored in reality.

I think that the America's behavior for the past century. Is a is a cautionary tale to anybody that wants to do business with with America. They will steal your money. They will bomb you to smithereens if you get on the wrong side of them. And so.

You know, I don't know that this don road doctrine. I don't know that the plan for the next five years. The way the Trump administration sees it towards the rest of South Central and South America. I don't know that that they have. I say in this.

I don't know that this is optional. It's what I'm getting at. I think that they they seek to impose these ideas on the rest of. On South America. Well, again, going back to where we started.

You can have a 10 step plan for global domination.

But if you can't figure out the early steps. It doesn't matter what step seven eight nine look like. You just won't ever get to him. So it's it's one thing that he's talking about this. He goes on to say for objective four of goal five.

Strength and technological edge prevent adversaries from accessing US developed technology. Good luck on it. You. US developed technology has been sold out the back door for as long as I've been alive. So licensed AI and cutting edge tech to only secure partner countries.

Maybe maybe not yeah dominate global market share through aggressive tech exports. Aggressive tech exports. I don't even know what that looks like. It sounds like a digital pin-op to come to me. But and raise money for investing in R&D for biotech.

Semiconductors quantum computers and telecommunications. So he's talking about technology. So he's saying that Mary wants America to be a technological leader in it. But it's not in a lot of the stuff. You know, we're still talking about windmills and so, you know, we've ditched the idea of nuclear.

We have all kinds of real authentic opportunities for technology, energy technology.

That may never see the light of day simply because they up in the existing structure here.

Oil companies. So. Let's move on. This is the last goal. Goal six.

We'll talk about targeted foreign assistance that puts American interest first. Again, sounds good. The core theme redirect foreign aid towards strategic US interests with emphasis on trade-based development over traditional humanitarian assistance.

You remember our traditional humanitarian assistance?

That's where we bomb a country filled with brown people to smithereens. And then when the ambulances show up, we then 30 minutes later, we bomb them again. That's called a double tap. Obama did that. When that other day of his presidency that was tarnished.

The first day, of course, being the day where the tan suit.

The second day being when he drones strike to wedding party and then waited for the first responders to show up and then hit them again. That'd be the second day for those keeping score. So objective one in this leverage assistance as state craft. Every dollar must be directly justified in terms of US interests. Boy, what a gray area that is.

Imagine dragging somebody in front of Congress for some house committee panel and whatever. And they go, I can't believe you spent all that money on this or that and he just goes, hey. It was justified because it was in the US interest. Is vague as you could be, right? Every dollar must be directly justified in terms of US interests.

US interest in giving money to Israel for their interests is that are interest in their interest. So because it gets a bit blurry, prioritize recipients who advanced US interests.

Military ties, migration cooperation, favorable UN voting, fair trade.

This is exactly what John Perkins said in confessions of an economic hitman.

This is what happened.

You would loan money. This is what he would do in Ecuador or in South America.

Go to Ecuador. Beautiful topography. Got the right place for a hydroelectric power plant that our guys will build. Loan you the money. We got you to set up with a loan from the World Bank.

I don't know. A billion dollars. 5% interest pay itself off in 15 years. Let's just say. Payments come.

Hydroelectric power plant gets built. Search generating revenue. Revenue goes towards paying back this loan. Loans getting paid back sort of. It's getting paid back kind of. It's getting paid back a little bit.

Fuck we've defaulted. World Bank comes in and says. It's a nice hydroelectric power plant of ours that we loaned you money to build with our guys. It seems you've fallen behind in your payments. We can't exactly go there with a sledgehammer and knock that hydroelectric power plant out and take it down.

But we can work with you. Maybe we renegotiate the terms of this deal.

What were the terms that John Perkins talked about?

Favorable UN voting. Voting our way in a UN resolution was one of the top ones. Hey, it seems you've fallen behind in your payments. We can rectify that. You see next month, we're going to have we're going to go.

You're all going to avoid being New York City. We're going to hit the UN building when they vote for whether or not we condemn the behavior of Israel. You're going to pretend like everything's good. Got it. We'll allow this to go.

So they they invent funny money federal reserve notes. Create conjure them out of thin air. Fiat currency by decree create an organization like the World Bank, which then takes these invented. Printed on demand. Funny money pieces of monopoly paper.

Loans them to countries at interest. The countries fall behind on their payment to repay the money money to this organization. The World Bank that is deemed itself a bank out of nowhere. It's a Rockefeller created entity. You've now fallen behind in payments to this bank that loaned you monopoly money.

And the next thing you have to do is you have to vote of a certain way in a UN security resolution meeting.

This is how you understand debt slavery. And this is why the light bulb went off for me in 2007 when I read that book. I just went, oh my God. I had no idea that the scam was this big. So when I see this, when I see a prioritized the recipients who advanced US interests.

Our military ties, our migration cooperation, our fair trade and our favorable UN voting. This is exactly what we're doing. This is no different. He goes on to save deploy assistance flexibility for diplomatic negotiations.

National security needs and critical mineral access.

So we've got money for you for all kinds of things. National security needs, critical mineral access. And even for diplomatic negotiations, you know, provided that you're on good terms with us. So they also want to re-aligned spending for the Western Hemisphere and East Asia. Currently, the amount of money that is being spent on the Western Hemisphere and East Asia.

And East Asia is about 10 to 15%. They would like that number to be 40%. So you're looking at anywhere from three to four times more than what it currently is to prioritize the Western Hemisphere. So if they have it their way, be buying a lot less stuff from China and a lot more stuff from Guyana. Or maybe even French Guyana.

We'll see. Golsaic's objective to promote trade, not aid. Invest in exporting American technology, talking about healthcare, communications, energy and transportation. So we want to invest in exporting American technology and we want to offer US investment as alternative to Chinese. We were saying they call this debt trap diplomacy.

Our debt trap is better than the Chinese debt trap.

I'm getting to ours, not theirs. That's basically what it is.

And they want to diversify partners away from NGOs towards American businesses. That I actually don't have a problem with because the NGOs are dangerous. They're unaccountable and definitely up to no good. Not that American businesses aren't as well, but if you had a preference, you'd go with that one over the other.

They also want to update procurement to market standards with investments fro...

All right.

Can't be the third world anymore, Western Hemisphere.

You're now going to have to all up your game, right? We have to update the procurement to market standards. We have certain standards. Can't have you do in this, you know, haphazardly, like you're in Guatemala or someplace.

Guatemala, you're going to have to step up into the first world.

The American Empire is dictated this, right? So this is it. This is what they're talking about. US Department of State Strategic Plan 2026 2030. I read it. You don't have to. It's boring.

But it's important in the sense that you have to understand what they're talking about.

Now, this is their business plan for the next five years. Now, as businesses go and as business plans have shown,

you have to allow for some flexibility, right?

Things come up and things change. This is the outline of where they want to take things. We'll see how it plays out. You know, it's also easy to put something like this into easier. I should say to put this into play.

When you aren't fighting wars on multiple fronts in New York, doing things like that. So as long as the American Empire continues to destabilize the Middle East, I don't think any of this is going to get done. Because part of their plan, part of them, the Trump doctrine,

is that we need to ditch the Middle East. We can't focus on that anymore. We need to really prioritize the Western Hemisphere. And I just don't think that our partners in Israel will allow that. Right?

And if they don't want that, then that's not going to happen. Because if it were really America first, we would prioritize the Western Hemisphere. And it's good to have goals, but doesn't mean they're going to magically happen just because they want them to.

You know, these people make a lot of mistakes.

And they may be monsters, but they're monsters who don't always get it right.

So nothing's set in stone. We must always push back. So for no other reason, just to be difficult. If you like this episode, you can take the additional step right now of sharing it with your friends and family.

Please rate the show. Give us five stars if you think we've earned it.

If you want to connect with me, macrogressions.io.

Thanks, everyone. Talk to you again, sis. (music) (upbeat music)

Compare and Explore