03-10-26 Part One - Wall Street's Wild Ride

Now, it's Red Eye Radio, Gary McNamara, and Eric Hurley,

“talk about everything from politics to social issues and views of the day,”

whether you're up late or you're just starting your day, welcome to the show from the Relief Factor Studios. This is Red Eye Radio. All across America, we are Red Eye Radio. I'm Gary McNamara, he's her curly.

Hello. Here we go. Wow, what a roller coaster ride that was. The Royal Market Chester Day, huh? I got it.

Well, all the markets. Yes.

Seriously, man, the Dow was down way way down.

But 800, I think. At one point, it knows further than that. I saw it down at 900 during the daytime trading, yeah. And then a huge swing, thankfully. Two hundred and something up, I think.

Two thirty nine on the Dow and three o' eight on the NASDAQ. So, oil is, well, it's still fluctuating. Now, down below 100, it's at 90 in change now. Brent, crude, that's the type of crude they produce in a ran. Actually, I don't know if they're producing anything right now.

But in that region, 94 and change on Brent crude. So, down below 100, I drove by the gas station. And it was the one down here, which is one of those known for lower prices. So, I checked on that still at 349. You know, over the weekend, I'm thinking to myself, because you go back to the summer 2008,

the all-time high for a barrel of oil was 147. And I thought to myself, I don't think we'll get there. But it looked like, I mean, we were actually on our way to 120. That would have been a very real possibility, but things settled in. President Trump got in front of the media and answered a few questions.

“I think really the markets look at the straight-of-form moves right now as more stabilized.”

We said then, then, then, then, then the uncertainty that that was there over the last, over the previous 72 hours leading up to Monday morning. Yeah. So, we said it yesterday. You know, when it's like, well, they have no navy left. Yeah. It's about the flow.

They, you, right, but, but U.S. said, okay, well, a score. Where we need's to be a score, a score. And we said that expect that oil prices are going to go down. But they went way up before they came down. Yeah.

But then they came down so drastically yesterday. It was like, okay, there must be some type of confidence. And they're, I will tell you this. So, the oil prices obviously has scared the White House. What they saw yesterday.

Oh, yeah. Well, I mean, again, it's, it's one more. And it's, it's one more thing. And I think most people know that it's, it's the war in Iran.

“But still, it's something you, you have to own on pricing politically here domestically.”

And, you know, the, and, and more information coming out about Russia and how they're helping Iran. Then the president, while talking about the straight or foremost, and, and keeping it safe and keeping things flowing through the straight, they actually brought up China. This actually benefits China and other countries.

Of course, there was clearly a reason for him to mention that. We're doing them a favor by making sure things are flowing through the straight or foremost that was the implication there. And I, I just thought to myself, all right, that's fine. You know, but you do have a problem right now with both Russia and China.

Well, I don't think that they, I don't think Iran is equipped to act on it. But certainly, if they become capable of attacking, of doing anything, the story got out that there was a message set after the initial strike, you immediately following the initial strike, US intel,

detected basically a threat that was designed to awaken sleeper cells globally.

And so we already know some of their proxies. Of course, we're at work in that in that first 24 hours. We don't know the US intel wasn't specific. They said there wasn't really a specific threat. Just basically that US law enforcement agencies need to keep their heads on a swivel.

And monitor chatter radioactivity.

I mean, because Iran never had any real intel.

“They had to buy it from other nations who had the ability to gather that intel.”

And they've never really had that. Iran's never had that themselves. Well, I guess I meant that looking at the White House, the messaging was all over the place yesterday. Oh, no, yeah, that's something totally different than what I was on.

It's the the whole back and well, I mean, in later in the day, it tells CBS, you know, it's it's mostly complete. And then later says, well, we could but we could go on for longer.

It might it might not take a couple more weeks, but then again it might. Well, there was this quote that got to me. We want to system the can lead to many years of peace.

And if we can't have that, we might also get it over with right now.

Yeah. And that's a quote by President. Right. And I went. Wow.

“And that's all because oil prices skyrocketed.”

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And I went, wow. You know, but that's, you know,

that isn't the messaging that you wish to put out. Now, we said the hard part would be where we're heading in the next couple of weeks. And that is will the people of Iran wish to take over and how do you do that?

How disabled has the police state become

that had to be a goal of the administration and Israel going into this. And now we did say, if you can't get to it, you have severely hurt even if the Iranian regime stays in. They're attempt at nuclear power and infrastructure.

And if you keep if you keep the sanctions on, it would hurt them tremendously. But this was the chance and everybody knew it,

“including the president of hopefully getting”

regime change and getting the Iranian people to have more of a democratic government. That was the goal. We talked about the opposition parties, whether it would see former Shah's son

or the former, I think, member of the, the government who was, who also is an exile. Every single one of those groups want the same thing and it was a secular democracy where it, where it's not a theocracy where the religion

does not lead, you know, the government. And the president was indicating all along that that's what he was going to do. So coming out where he said we want a system that can lead to many years of peace

and if we can't have that, we might also get it over with right now. You just sent the message to the regime because enough disruption and this is another American president who will back out.

You know, one of the, one of the many conundrums that they're in, that the administration is in is, all right, first of all, you're going to have to let the dust settle

to find out how solid that that police state is. You know, you're not going to commit to boots on the ground. That's not going to happen, at least not yet. And I don't know that it will ever happen in Iran.

If you, and then the other conundrum is the mixed messaging on this is it about regime change while describing how it's about regime change, you know, when it initially started. Now, I wondered yesterday afternoon,

and I thought, well, wait a minute, is this the place so that if they get through this and say, well, we're not going to really, we can't, the roots are too deep. And we can't actually get regime change,

but we took out their military ability to reach outside of their borders. How they're going to treat their citizens going forward, we can monitor, but what happens internally in Iran, we may not be able to change,

but we, because we can't get complete, we can't accomplish complete regime change, but we can take out all of their military ability to reach outside of their borders. And that may have been the play on the mixed messaging

about, no, this isn't about regime change. I don't know, I can't tell you, it's just a guess. But we're in the situation now that, again, you're going to have to let the dust settle to find out who, how much power they actually have internally.

How viable is there, is there police state?

But again, if they can't defend themselves as a nation

“from outside forces, then have you broken the will.”

With harmonious sun now being the Supreme Leader, you have to monitor and I guess wait and see what that message is going to be. My thought would have been you keep doing the same thing, whoever the next Supreme Leader is is now the target.

But again, if they're going to stay on this message that it's not about regime change, then obviously they're not going there. And they haven't, yes, or they haven't been able to find them. And then the president said, a Monday,

we've already won in many ways, but we haven't won enough.

Yeah. And so it's just like the story. Wall Street Journal has a story.

“Aides are telling him, you got to end this thing now.”

Right, reading here from the Wall Street Journal editorial, Iran is not winning this war, but it might, if U.S. stops the bombing due to higher oil prices, is the time for president Trump to call off the bombing and declare victory in Iran.

You'd think so judging by the panic in Washington as the price of oil spikes. That certainly is the fork, a fondest wish of the Ayatollas, who know they're losing. The reality inside Iran and the region is that the U.S. in Israel continued to make progress.

The regime loses more of its military each day, along with the ability to hurt neighbors. He has rarely says to make 70 to 75% of Iran's missile launchers have been destroyed. And the U.S. has destroyed, at least 43 Iranian ships, unmunded the United Arab Emirates received only 18 drones.

Down from 126 a day over the past week, will soon see if that was a blip or a meaningful decline. Central Command's Admiral Brad Cooper said last week that Iran's missile and drone volumes were down 90 and 83% respectively. Attacks on Iran's internal security institutions are intensifying.

At 10 days in, the war can hardly be considered prolong. There's nothing gradual about U.S. or Israeli strategy. Instead, there's a race. Can Iran do enough damage to global energy markets with its remaining missiles and drones before it loses them and must come to terms.

Because that's where you're at right now. If you have the ability to take out everything and keep the oil moving, why would you end it? And is that where we're at right now? That would be the question.

Yeah. I think that's part of the waiting for the dust to settle to see how much they've done internally, how much power there really is. How much control internally there really is. We know what we've done to their military ability to reach again outside the borders.

But again, part of the list of conundrums is what you just mentioned and that is there are a lot of people that are watching a clock on this whole thing. You know, they want this thing to be over in a weekend. I'm talking domestically here in the U.S. You know, politically when the President set over the weekend that high gas prices are small price to pay.

“That's how hard-pilled to swallow for people that are right now on prices still politically.”

They're not on your side. You're still having to win them over and you're in a midterm season.

That is critical because you need the house and the Senate to get your agenda done for the rest of your second term.

I mean, you're just at this point now where, and you also can't say, "Mission, you can't have one of these mission accomplished moments." And say, "Yeah, well, we're done and then it's not done because Iran is still killing their own people, killing their own citizens for protesting, if that is to continue from the regime, from what's left of the regime. You know, the question is, again, how much control do they actually have? I don't think I think what settled the markets was not the President necessarily saying that we have control of the state of Hormune.

It was watching the traffic in the straight. And then the market saying, "Well, let's see if that's actually the case." And it's seen by, again, all sources that things again were more stabilized than what was thought. Because it was a huge question mark because if it's done, if you can't get anything through the straight, that would have been nightmarish for the markets in terms of oil prices, for the consumer.

And of course, if you've got oil prices weighing, then that's going to affect what people have available to spend. And the Dow and the Nasdaq and the rest of the markets are really as a result of that.

“It's just, you're in this moment, I think, that we had questions about.”

And that is, okay, you're not going to have boots on the ground. But you don't know what they have available to them internally. To control to remain in control as a regime. You don't see really any movement on the ground from the citizens because they just simply aren't empowered to make that kind of move right now. They just aren't.

Well, we had said this for the very beginning that you're promoting regime change while denying it. Yeah, what you shouldn't do, right, it's one of the other because it's obvious. But in order to get regime change, you're depending on things that are completely out of your control, which is how will the people in a foreign country respond even if the majority agree with what you're doing. If they don't have the weaponry to do so, and the police state is still functioning with the weapons that they have.

Right, right, that's always been we said that from day one, that's the problem.

That's the challenge you're putting your faith, you know, in that. And that's beyond your control. Right, we are right, I radio brought to you by hot shot secret. Hi, I'm Jen Lumis, a transport safety expert at JJ Keller.

“In order to manage speed, you need to understand the four factors involved in stopping a vehicle.”

Perception distance is the distance of vehicle travels from the time you see a hazard until you're brain recognizes it. The perception time for an alert driver is approximately three-fourths of a second. Reaction distance is the distance of vehicle travels from the time your brain tells your foot to move from the accelerator until your foot hits the brake pedal.

The average driver has a reaction time of three-fourths of a second.

Break leg distance also needs to be taken into account. When operating a vehicle with air brakes, it takes about half a second for the mechanical operation to take place. Finally, breaking distance is the distance it takes a vehicle to stop once the brakes are applied. Breaking distance is affected by the weight, length and speed of the vehicle, as well as road condition. This tip was brought to you by JJ Keller and Associates.

Visit us at JJ Keller.com. Coming up more with Gary McNamara and Eric Carley. It's Red Eye Radio. [Music] Here when I radio, he is Eric Carley and I'm Gary McNamara.

And so that's always been the challenge here.

Look, it may be even if you don't have regime changes. We said from day one and even before day one knowing that we might go in, we always looked at what is the actual end game. If there's a number of goals, one of them to deplete the ability of a ran for the next decade to project any type of military power, you probably accomplish what you wish to accomplish if you continue with the sanctions.

Right. And then you continually go after them if you think that they're rebuilding. Right. You put them under control. Now there may be a huge civil war going on because you continue to do that over and over again.

And you continue, even though it's not officially at war, you continue to target and help the massage do what they need to do to assassinate more leaders. Right. Yeah. And you could, again, they're their ability to do anything with energy. And that's where you see an implosion again.

“How empowering is that to the citizens of Iran to overthrow what's left of the regime?”

I don't know. And politically, can you sell that in the United States? Right. [ Music ] Tired of partisan noise?

America's more divided than ever, but independent Americans is adding the light to contrast all that she-- Independent Americans, daily news with Army Veteran Paul Rikaw. Pressing issues of the day, the leaders who are shaping what America will be in the future. We're going to bring the righteous media five eyes, independence, integrity, information, inspiration, and impact.

Independent Americans, from belief, follow and listen on your favorite platform.

[ Music ] We have a line open. One, eight, six, nine, he wrote, I read, I radio. And he is there, Carlton, I'm Gary McNamara, download our right-eye radio app today. And you can listen, when and where you choose with the oil markets doing what they did yesterday. And, you know, and we've talked about this.

We believe that the president should have had everybody in a room. Everybody agreed what the talking points were. You know, on, you know, the military action in Iran. And then he should have held a prime time speech. Yeah, and it's really waiting for that.

I thought it was going to happen. So did I. And the fact is that's what you do.

You explain things to the American people as to, you know, what's going on.

“The other thing I think that was a problem was, again,”

and we've said this over and over again, claiming that it's not about regime change, as you continue to talk about regime change. You know, the one thing is, people, things are easy to understand. Wars are easy to understand, prices are easy to understand.

Yeah. And you can explain it, you know, in a way, we hope to get regime change, but if we don't, we destabilize them for a decade, and we will continue to go after them,

and we will, you know, starve out the Iranian government. You know, you, but when you, the plan was from the beginning,

the president's first eight minutes speech,

was get ready Iranian people to take over your government. So this is regime change. No, because we're not going to do it on our own. And then over the weekend, the president says, "Well, you know, I'll have a, I'll have a say

in who gets, you know, to be the, you know, the new leader of Iran." And it's like, "What?" And it's just, the, the messaging when you're at war in the United States has to be precise,

or you could lose the public very quickly. Now, the one thing that was out there, it was the U.K. poll that showed that if it just last weeks, and you accomplished the goals of the president, stated it showed that the American public overwhelmingly

was with the president. Yeah, you saw that. Yeah. But they panic, there are two things yesterday. They panicked on prices yesterday on, on oil prices.

And that, that scared the White House.

“That's why the messaging was all over the place.”

By the time the oil prices went down again, it was like, "Well, no, we're going to go. We're going to make sure we finish the job." The other thing was, as you know, they're really shook about prices right now

in affordability. The president yesterday outlined five key items. He believes will tip the upcoming midterm elections in the GOP favor if Republicans can muscle them through Congress. No, no transgender mutilation surgery for our children.

Voter ID, citizenship verification, mail-in ballots. We don't want men playing in women's sports. What's not in there? Pricing talking about the economy and how great the economy is. We have said this a long time ago,

you can't Biden lost because he promoted that inflation wasn't a problem. And he would tell you that things are doing great when the public knows judges by their own economy what they feel each and every day.

This administration has done everything they possibly can to tell the American people that the economy is great. And in some areas, it is.

“But to the public, the only thing that matters is prices.”

What they feel each and every day, you and I said it yesterday, you know, productivity for last year looked really good. You know, that could be AI. Job creation has been zero over the last 10 months. Manufacturing of the lost 80,000 jobs.

The trade deficit has not changed. Right. And, you know, the president lost the Supreme Court on the tariffs. He'll most likely lose on Section 122. In fact, we made the argument yesterday.

It's probably even clear legally because he keeps saying Section 122 is he legally can do it because it's about balance of trade.

And everybody in the financial world knows that.

And so he's going to lose that.

“When you got the democrat, when you have the democrat attorney generals,”

quoting Milton Freeman, well, that was mind-boggling. Watching that. But, and so the five things that they say, the GOP needs to focus on nothing is on the economy to promote how great the economy is to the fact that we've lowered prices.

Not mentioned. I was telling you during the break, it's a lot like what I've probably told my kids or, you know, any young people in my life. Well, if there's something you can do about it, you're not doing it. Then quit talking about it.

Yeah. If you're not going to do anything about it, don't don't bring it up. By the way, believe this is the right strategy right now. I don't understand. Yeah, I'm going to make you clear.

I don't disagree with the strategy. Just move away from it. But because if the more you tell people things are great, and they're struggling with prices, the more of a problem it is for you politically.

You're just not going to, again, there's not going to be a change with terrorists until the courts act. And we don't know how soon that will be. He started with the day the judgment came down from the Supreme Court.

The clock started on the 150 days on the current 10 percent terrorist.

So that's going to get you a way too close to election time. That's five months. And if you're not going to reverse it by then or if there's not a stay, by the courts by then, then nothing changes. Move away from it.

Quit talking about it. Move on. Talk about the, again, go back to the state of the union address and talk about how crazy the Democrats are and point to them and, you know, show over and over again what they want to do. I talk about the borders being secure.

Talk about the world being more secure as a ran. And the regime has fallen or whatever it's going to be, but you talk about anything but pricing.

And I don't know how you get away with that in your home district in the house.

Because there is nothing more pressing than that. It's a daily occurrence for people in terms of issues they do. I'll give you an example yesterday on my street. Everybody's in a group text. I don't really participate much.

And they really don't get political at all.

“But you know, the only thing that everybody was talking about yesterday morning.”

Everybody going back and forth. All right, we're supposed to be can fill up at a cheaper price today. The only thing that the group text from my neighborhood was talking about yesterday. Yeah. Yeah.

And everybody might be able to look at it and go, okay. Yeah. A ran needed to be taken out, but still I can't afford this. Because again, that's the problem with saying something like it's a small price to pay over the weekend. I would have phrased it as it is temporary prices will stabilize very quickly.

Just leave it at that. Yeah. Well, we said it yesterday. Then we said, well, it's true if they're escorting the tankers. Yeah.

And other countries come into help. You're going to see oil prices go down quickly. I didn't think they were going to rise as fast as they did. They've come down as quickly as they did. Yeah.

There's a wild ride. A little bit of a jittery market there. Six flags had rides like that. I'd be going back to six flags. I'd say the oil markets took more G's than I did when I flew with the Thunderbirds and an absolutely

stack.

“But I think right now that's what they have to do.”

Because the worst thing, and we told this to the White House over and over again, do not tell people that what they are feeling is not what they're feeling when it comes to prices. I didn't lost the White House. I believe that's the number one reason. I believe immigration and also the radical transgender movement help push in that particular direction.

But the other thing is, too, when you look at it, the Democratic Party, you know, it's got Jennings was saying yesterday, does anybody actually believe we should keep the Department of Homeland Security

Does anybody believe it with the Iranian terror cells, whatever?

And you would think the Democratic Party would jump and go, okay. We still disagree with the president, but the Department of Homeland Security is necessary. And because of the president's wrong actions, you know, even if they said that.

“Yeah, if you want to go that route, he's made us, let's say, we got to do this.”

Right. Exactly. They won't do that. Why? Because they believe they're bulletproof.

They believe that they can hold every single radical position that no major political party is ever held in the history of the United States and their voters will say, okay, you know, I'm going through that article that I told you about yesterday. The city journal research that they did on Democrats, whether the Democrat voter actually agrees, you know, with the Democrats in the House and in the Senate.

And it said, no, they're actually more moderate. And I was going through it. It's like, you know, that's what they're claiming to the polls.

But the fact is they're not more moderate.

They may want to be moderate, but they're not voting that way. And they're not actively coming out and telling their party very few people are. Look, you know, you could be saying whatever at the kitchen table. Right. That whole thing kitchen table.

But as long as they're pulling the lever for those people to be the radicals that are in power, you're, you're a radical.

“It's, it's, you're either on their side or not.”

You know, I, I sub-dilmar with the, the, the Pakistan Harris. You know, both Democrats. And they're talking about the radical transgender movement. And it's really crazy how we actually hold this position over and over and over again. And I went, wow, you know, except for, you know, maybe Bill Mar.

That's it. Yeah. That's the only Democrat. I know that's willing to speak out and say, this is crazy.

They don't speak out on it.

Voting's one thing. Speaking out, you can still speak out and say, I'm speaking out. They're wrong for doing this. But I'm still going to vote for them because I like this, this and this. You don't even hear that.

There is no, there is no attempt at justification for the thing. The left believes. Think about this. I saw the poll the other day. And I know it's an early poll.

But Tala Rico's up on whoever the Republicans run for November. Yep. This is the state of Texas. He's a nutcase. He's absolutely nutty.

“He's got a child-like mentality and he's crazy on the issues.”

Democrats even in Texas don't care. No, they don't care. Which means you can be crazy. We don't have crazy eyes. Which means they may tell the pollster when they're more moderate.

But in reality, they're not because we know it. If Republicans disagree with Republicans, they talk about it all the time. Yeah. Were they disagree? Democrats won't.

No. We'll tell the pollster. Is this anonymous? But I'm not going to tell the Democratic Party. I agree with him.

Is it intimidation? I think there's some of that. I don't know. It's also, I think, in part. And again, can't measure it.

Get Scott or ask me something on the phone, please. I have to believe that in part, it's, well, again, boil the frog slowly. We don't need Jasmine Crocket. She's radical too, but she's too loud. Calarico comes off as someone who's not loud.

He's serious. He's radical. But see, he's serious. He's, he grapples like Obama. Well, but that for them, they see that as a winning strategy.

But they're the party of racism with identity politics. They admit it. Yes. They're the party of anti-Semitism. Yep.

The party of misogyny and sexism with the radical transgender movement. Right. Just those things alone. Yeah. You know, they don't want voter ID.

We're the vast majority of the majority of, there was new poll out. Even more people believe now in voter ID and being a citizen ship. And being a citizen, 71% of Democrats. It doesn't matter what they say. They don't vote that way.

Nope. So we're not talking one issue. We're talking all the major issues. Yeah. Yep.

We don't care. You're either a radical or you're not. We are right. I radio. Get in touch with what I radio told free at 866.

May be right.

We are right. I radio.

He's our early non-giring McNamara.

“You know, one thing I did like with Trump said yesterday.”

He said, look, there's a lot more damage we could do, but we don't want you to do it. We want to see what happens. And that's how the people respond. So what's going on behind the scenes. How do you get the people to respond?

Just Trump could out there and say, OK, now take the streets. He talked about the fact of, and you and I had talked about this a lot. We haven't taken down the electrical grid. We haven't done a lot of things for the infrastructure that could help destroy Iran for decades, but it would hurt the people.

That's the challenge that you had from day one. Yeah. Right. And you're still, I mean, it's very delicate internally there in Iran now. You don't because you don't really know.

Again, how solid that police state still might be. Not for the our news is brought to you by how products. Visit how products.com.

This is Red Eye Radio on Westwood One.

Now, it's Red Eye Radio, Gary McNamara, and Eric Hurley talk about everything from Politics to Social Issues and views of the day, whether you're up late or you're just starting your day. Welcome to the show from the Relief Fector Studios. This is Red Eye Radio. All of us America, we are Red Eye Radio.

He is our Crony and I'm hearing McNamara.

“I mean, I think we're in a fascinating time in politics right now.”

Just during the top of the hour, just looking at some of the stories out there and Democrats say, no, no, we're not going to fund the HS. No, no, no, we're not going to do. We don't care what happens at the airport. We don't care.

There may be sleeper cells. We don't care. The terrorist attack in New York City. Near the mayor's mansion. We don't care.

We just don't care. Why?

Because there's no consequences for it.

They even look at it because Republicans are coming out every day with the latest polls. Excuse me. Republicans aren't. The posters are and Republicans are commenting on them. Democrats sing to a new voter low.

A new national polls, the latest indicate Democrats are facing major problems with the party's image. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that.

We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that.

We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that.

We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that.

We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that.

We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that.

We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that.

We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that.

We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that.

We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that.

We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that.

We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that.

We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that.

We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that. We're not going to vote on that.

You're never going to win that with parents.

You're just not.

“But on a lot of the other crazy stuff that doesn't affect them every day.”

You're going to get the polls are going to come back and say, man, they're crazy. And then come election day. They're still going to win some races. Well, you know, I was over the weekend. I was driving the car.

I'm glad you're brought that up. New York City because I wanted to relate this going down the road. And I've got, you know, in in my phone probably, I don't know, five thousand songs. I mean, I have downloaded them all. And basically, the vast majority came from CDs.

I spent like three months, 15 years ago, transfering everything to digital.

And I just like, you know, having the music, but I got tons of songs on it. And a song came up. I only have one song from this band. And the song is called Salvador and the band's name is your Vegas. Now anybody who watched and it was the Spike Lee documentary that they did on the

Rebuilding of the World Trade Center that came out like Maybe 2005, 2006 on the actual construction workers. And everything involved in it. And that's the lead in to it. Right. And it fits perfect. I think the lyrics are, you know,

over the river, over, you know, looking at the hero and his lover. And you think of first responders at 9/11, everybody that was lost at that point. And every time I hear that song, every single time I hear it, I'm almost brought to tears because you know what I think of, I think of falling man. I think of those people in the World Trade Center that had to make the choice.

And say, am I going to die my way or die by the terrorist way. And so they decided to jump.

“I never forget the one photographer saying,”

you could almost see the determination to tell the terrorists where they could go. You're not going to determine, you know, when I die, I will.

That has never left me the horror, the absolute.

None of us can imagine being in that kind of position. And making that type of final decision with our lives. Those were Americans that had to make that decision. Those were Americans that were murdered in a terrorist attack who had to make the most horrible decision. And here we are.

Twenty-five years later with somebody who is sympathetic is a anti-Semite. Is pro-Islamic radicalism and a communist. And he leads the city of New York. He's one of the party leaders. And the mayor never forget New York City went,

what the hell? Let's celebrate 9/11. Here we are. I mean, look after October 7th. I said it.

“I don't know how many times you're going to have it.”

If there were another 9/11 type attack on American soil, you're going to see protesters cheering. I think about that in that short time. And so the fact that my point is the Democrats are going, we can be crazy.

The more Trump calls us crazy, we believe we're getting people going, we like crazy. Because Trump doesn't like crazy. How crazy can we get? Because if they believe chaos works in their favor,

even if the large number of the rank and file a plurality, or just a huge chunk of them, whatever it is, says no, that's not the way I'm going to behave. They're still voting for them. Yeah?

And they won't come out against them. No? And you know, you can see it. I've said it. There are things I disagree with on Trump, and I'll point out exactly what they are.

But I'll still vote for him because here's where the other side stands on the issues. You and I are articulated every day. Every Republican that I know are articulated exactly how they feel what they agree and disagree with. Then I know.

And you don't see that on the other side. And so unless I see that coming from Democrats and I've said, the Democrats that I know don't speak at all anymore. They don't say anything where they may be challenged.

But they're not anywhere in the arena of ideas. You don't see the politicians attempting to defend what they believe. Watch as if it were the perfect example. Watch new some squirm around and warm around and deflect and do whatever he possibly can.

But we'll never confront the issue directly because he knows he can't win it.

But it doesn't matter. He doesn't care if he can't win it. Just be crazy. Look at it. It was a latest from Tala Rico. Got the latest of the latest video that came out of what he said. Oh my God. It was just you're just like he's a nutcase.

Yeah. Well, I mean, look at how long it took for Democrats to recognize how weak new some it's. We go back to when he was on the city council in San Francisco. And it was like, well, watch this guy. He's being too loud to not want to be on the rise.

And of course he was.

And then after his bungling of the of handling the wildfires.

And a number of other things that I would say the debate with. Governor Florida to Santa's probably didn't help along the way. You see how weak he is. But this is a guy who also won a recall. Think about that.

They don't the wind doesn't have to be massive. It doesn't have to be a huge blue wave that just need to win. Yeah.

“And that's why when you sit there and you think in any other time.”

The Democrats who to come out and said, look, Trump's going to war and we disagree with it, but we need to fund homeland security because we don't want Americans being killed. They can't do that. No, no.

They can't even do that. They have to sit there and say, no, we wish to put the nation in danger. So we can have the legal immigrant criminals on the street. That's their message. Yeah.

And they're like, this is a great message. And we believe that we can win on this messaging. Yeah. We'll see whether they can or not. But that's what they believe.

Well, it's, I'll tell you. Again, you get back down to the districts and everything is going to be about pressure. Yeah. This is the problem in the house. Is that you go home to campaigning your district?

It doesn't matter what the talking points are from the top. They're going to have to answer questions. And I don't know, there are no answers.

“No, but, yeah, I think you just added to it.”

Democrats look as long as prices are a problem with the American public. We win no matter what insane position we take. Yep. Yep. I mean, that's really what they, they're clearly their position.

If things were, if the economy was booming, I mean, the Democrats may be in the rear view right now with, with a very little hope of winning the House or Senate for years to come. If pricing wasn't an issue, again, not everything in the economies you mentioned earlier, not everything in the economy is bad.

The pricing is still an issue. And if you're not going to focus on it, if there's not going to be any focus on it, and again, this started even before last year when they were getting ready for the midterm, this should have been the focus when they were getting ready for the 24 election.

“It should have been, all right, what are we going to do?”

Because we can't promise to bring prices down,

because inflation at a target rate of 2% is always going to mean that prices go up.

So we've got to get in and we've got to just make the economy boom, boom, boom, boom. But we can't promise to bring prices down, because once you do, you won't. And at the end of last year, you had a number of people saying, "Whatever you're going to do, do it now." And I don't know how many people hedged or, I guess, put everything in one basket,

But you and I looked at that and said, "Well, based on what Bessent is saying." And a couple of things, the president is said, leading up to the scotist decision. They clearly had a backup plan.

They were not going to let this, because Bessent basically said it.

This is what we're going to do, and it's exactly what they ended up doing, the day of the scotist decision. And here we are. So I didn't think anything was going to change, and it seems the market had kind of priced that in as well. But you're not going to see anything between now and the end of that five month period,

unless the court steps in with a stay. But there's no proactive movement.

“The point is, if you're going to do something, you should have done it a long time ago.”

I don't have any confidence, there's going to be any change coming directly from them. They're actions. Any change would probably come from the court. We said that late last year, but even if the court does it, well, the court does it. I don't know if prices will come down, quick enough.

I don't know.

Well, I don't think they'll come down, but will they moderate.

And then if you solve the Iran thing, if gas prices come crashing down. There's still a lot that can happen between now and November. The number one thing is prices still. Yeah, the American public. We are right.

I radio. This morning's USDA farm report is brought to you by house products. Tested, trusted guaranteed since 1920. Farm security is national security. And from that context, USDA's national farm security action plan involves

interagency partners of the federal state and local levels to protect our nation's sector. Across the federal community, we have different perspectives, different interests, and different stakeholders.

But we all share the belief that protecting U.S. agriculture protects the United States from

its adversaries. That USDA Office of Homeland Security Director Matt Allen, speaking at this year's agricultural outlook forum, he knows agriculture to public collaboration with agencies such as the Treasury Award departments, in protecting threats to all areas of ag, from farm land itself to biotech.

Agriculture is highly technical and sophisticated, perfectly measured and adapted to maximize productivity. Hence, the deed through these partnerships to share information regarding security, vulnerability, and agriculture. Add developed novel technical solutions and innovations to farm based challenges.

I'm Rod Bane reporting for the U.S. Department of Agriculture in Washington, D.C. This report brought to you by Senax, Fules, and Looms. We'll be right back with more Red Eye Radio with every currently young Gary McNamara. We are Red Eye Radio. He's our currently non-Gerry McNamara.

You know, James Carvel, who's been talking about the crazy and the democratic

“party, I think, decided that he's going to become crazy now too.”

Cannot play the audio because there's too much curse words in it. But he actually said, "Over the weekend, I've got Trump Terrangement Syndrome. I hate the M.F.R." And you know what? I don't want to get rid of it.

I don't want it to get better. I wanted to get worse. I want to hate him more. I pray to God in heaven. God, rain the righteous rain of Trump Terrangement Syndrome on me.

Pray for me, Lord. I'm your vessel on this earth. Pray for people that listen to this. We want more. We want to hate the son of a beast so much that we can't see straight.

I just don't have it, man. I want it. I don't want it to get better. I want it to get worse. I want to invoke the name of Providence.

The name of the Almighty. He who rules the world and the king of us all. The king of kings. I want his blessing. I want to have a vision tonight where I'm sleeping.

I want the Lord to appear to me and say, James, you are my humble servant. You are executing thy will on this earth. And I want you to tell all the friends and all the people that will listen to you or whatever. Blankety Blank. We got here.

Wow. Praying. Praying to him. Or hatred in your heart. He's praying for him.

Wow, hatred.

“Deathcrats believe that's the key to victory.”

Well, first of all. Hmm. Kind of ironic because now liberals are going to hate him for praying. No, no, no, they've Talariko has made it so they've all found God and they can interpret God in their own way to even promote hate.

God wants me to hate. Right.

“They won't be the next time around that they're convention booing God.”

They'll be praising God, but they'll tell you God is okay with abortion.

Well, they may be confusing God for them. Hmm. The other guy. A church lady would say, say, hmm. Hmm.

Yeah, maybe. Wow. Catch Red Eye Radio Live every night on the Red Eye Radio app available in the app store. Red Eye Radio. And I'm Gary McNamara along with Eric Carly coming up here in just a couple of minutes.

The National Park Service announces a return of independent state fireworks to Mount Rushmore.

And I did mention church lady before. Oh, yeah. We'll actually have something that relates to that coming up. All right. More on the conversation coming up when I talked to you about I mentioned just yesterday about the project I did for my dad.

I was using power tools. I love using power tools, but before taking relief factor, if I was outworking all day with power tools, my hands the inflammation would be just horrible the next day. Sometimes I still wake up the next day going, okay, where's the inflammation? Where's the pain? It's not there because of relief factor and you can get that to.

My dad always tells me, worry about the things you can control with relief factor, you can manage your pain.

Drug free. In fact, relief factor is 100% drug free research based formula that goes to the source of your inflammation.

“You need to try it. Try relief factors three week quick start.”

Just 1995 visit relief factor dot com 800 for relief is the number 800. Then number four relief relief factor dot com 800 for relief use red eye in the drop down for your three week quick started 1995. Eric, the National Park Service announced yesterday the return of independent state fireworks to Mount Rushmore. By the way, that was the scene of one of Trump's best speeches ever. Remember that?

Yeah, that one will always remain. Following a five year absence of fireworks will be launched Friday, July 3rd. A lottery will be held for public tickets for the event in partnership with the state of South Dakota. We are excited to reinstate a spectacular fireworks show at the highlight of Mount Rushmore's independent state commemoration. We invite the public to enjoy the show and reflect on our nation's remarkable journey and the great patriotic leaders who established persevered and expanded our country's destiny.

In 2021. The National Park Service denied a request from South Dakota for fireworks at Mount Rushmore to celebrate the fourth of July the following year. And then South Dakota Governor Kristi Nome said that the National Park Service denied her request for fireworks in Mount Rushmore for independent state because the Democrats don't want to celebrate independent state. Right. Yeah.

I wonder, you know, there's going to be. With the big 250 thing going on, there's going to be a ton of protests out there. You know, you know, it's going to happen. Well, I think in order to be fair. That we should have independent stay for most of us and dependent stay.

No, it's brilliant for the for the Democrats and they can hand in their freedom card on dependent stay. Here you go. Yes. Here's my freedom card. Now control my life.

But that's one of the other things. I mean, it was fireworks Mont Rushmore. Yeah. I mean, what could be more American than that? Right. Democrats can't have it.

Right. No, the can't. That's. Now, when we look at the election here, you know, I'd mentioned church lady and this was, this was,

“I saw this on Twitter yesterday and I went, well, and I think we played this before.”

They didn't say this yesterday. This was a couple of months back. But I'd mentioned church lady at the Democrats are confusing God with Satan. Say. And then I realized that I'd seen David Spade and, oh, what's his name?

No. Like Martin Luther. Like Martin Luther. Dana Carvey. Yeah.

On there on there. Yeah. Because Dana Carvey does. Dana Carvey does. Yeah.

Churchly. Right. Right. But this is interesting because this is, when you look at it now, prices don't affect them as much as people that don't have as much money as they do.

But still, what's on their mind, living in California? Because one of the things we've talked about is, yeah, I worry about the midterm. Because I understand how prices can affect how people will vote for insane things. If they believe the prices will come down, even if that's the party that denied them to begin with, that was much worse and caused the problem which we're still trying to solve today.

Right. But I look long-term at the Democratic Party.

And the problem is socialism doesn't work.

Yeah. Right.

“That's why I don't fear socialism taking over the United States because it doesn't work.”

And if it doesn't work, as we see already, people leave companies leave. See Yamaha leaving California. Yeah. Yeah. It's again, at some point, you can't afford to stay.

And so long-term socialism is doomed in the United States, especially we did that over the other day. The majority of Democrats that support socialism don't even know what it is. Right. Sounds good. Right. But here's this, here's this back and forth between David Spade and David and Dana Carvey.

Here we go. The same broader problem with people paying taxes in California when they're building a hundred

billion-dollar train to Sacramento, San Francisco area.

So I don't know if everyone's clamoring for it when you could take 10 billion and probably fix a lot of problems in California. But they keep pushing this 10-year thing about the train. That's just one of the crazy things. The homeless, they lose 20 billion, but they want more money for it.

“Well, that's why people get tired of paying taxes and going, what are you doing?”

You have a news from just vetoed a bill asking for an audit of where the money for homeless goes. He said not a chance. You're not going to see that. Well, I don't think anyone could disagree with this. There are states.

I don't have a mob hand. Who basically you go to their website and they tell you where all the money is going. Yeah. Line by line. Maybe it's thousands of pages a year, but you can see where it's going.

So when there's behind the curtain, don't pay attention to Gavin's. It's a little bit frustrating because you can't ask for more. If someone's if you're in a household and someone's blowing all the money. What are you spending on? Don't worry about it.

Just give us more money. Well, I'd like to see something. And if it's fixing home, it's great. But don't just take it and then be like, homeless got worse. It's like, excuse me.

Excuse me.

Could we ask where the 20 billion went?

Or that's a great question, but no. Garth, I'm sorry. Garth. Garth. That's okay.

It's a little bit of Garth. I love that because that sounds like Garth in that moment. But the only reason I'm bringing that up is they're mostly not political. Right. You know, they're not certainly not to the point where you just lined up.

That's a very big political issue is the spending. But that was a big deal in California when it came down about the, you know, they spent all of this money on the homeless. And nobody really knows what was done and apparently nothing was. And then he makes the point that he vetoed the audit. And it's like, well, proof that Saturday night live is conservative propaganda.

[ Laughter ] Number one. But it's, by the way, it's a joke. But no, you look at where, you know, people are affected by what's going on. You know, this is something that helps Republicans.

“Because if, but the Democrats in California aren't going to change in terms of how they vote, right?”

It's not going to, the state's not going to go red. But when you see what Democrats in the blue states are doing. And you see the growth in the red states. Then there is that effect. I don't know how much it moves the needle in a midterm.

Again, my confidence, look, we come in and clean the slate and say, okay, even without.

When it comes to the GOP and their ability or inability to actually get the message across and campaign properly.

It's just been just, it's worse than it pulling teeth. Pulling teeth is easy compared to this. Trying to tell them exactly how to get it done. And if you look at everything, you know, so then you put everything back on the plate that people are dealing with, you know, reality. And that's where it changes.

That's where you've got to wonder which is worse. What if pricing affects people every single day.

“And is the crazy on the blue side affecting their numbers?”

It might be, but they might still win elections in big ways, which includes the house in the fall. You know, I go back to the margins to begin with of the Senate and the House.

Given the comeback in 24 by Donald Trump, man, the GOP should have just been able to really knock it out of the park and had a much bigger margin.

But that margin is just slowly eroding. But remember, when Trump got elected, his party, the people and independence were solidly behind the fact that the economy would rebound. Yeah, because of tariffs, so the public wanted the tariffs. Right. Right.

Now they're saying, but prices are too high. Now, is there a disconnect between? Why? Is there a disconnect in the public?

“And if you tend to, whatever, they may be due to different groups.”

They're there. Yeah. Do they not associate tariffs with that if you're trying to bring down prices as we've stated before, even if you believe it's justifiable. And there are justifiable reasons to use tariffs. But even if you believe there's justifiable reason for tariffs, you are increasing the cost of doing business, which is the opposite of bringing prices down when the public first is concerned with bringing prices down.

Right. You know, it's like, "Dose." You know, you go to the public and the public will say, "Absolutely, we got to do something about the debt." We have to do something about the debt. And what are we going to do about the debt? Well, we're going to cut.

Well, what are you going to cut? Well, what do you want cut? We're going to start in your neighborhood. No, no. We know the majority of the population, all the latest polls, the majority of the population say, raise the spending on everything except for an aid.

Right. And we can cut the budget. So the public, which hasn't, by the way, that sentiment hasn't changed on foreign aid in, I don't know, decades and decades. Right. Again, when Trump came out and he talked about who was going to give money to? I forgot who it was.

And they said, "What do you mean? You said you don't want to, well, no, no, we said, we don't want to give the raw for aid." Oh, who was talking about that yesterday? What? I saw a clip and it was, and they were on it and it was like, you know, this is the problem that we have here. And we also did, we played something, I don't know if we played an audio clip too.

Somebody else was kind of on that same, on that same line of thought. And you, that's the problem. You know, it goes back to the 2016 election, the day after the election in Harlem, kind of in Pronto, man on the street, pole taking by the Wall Street Journal. Why do you think Trump won and Hillary lost?

Because he was talking about things at home and she was talking about things. Elsewhere. And you saw that too in 24.

“Because how many in the MAGA group thought he's the nice relations?”

But Democrats have turned it around on him, though. Oh, yeah. You know, you see it on social media every day. What? The president in Venezuela. He's over here doing this.

Now he's trying to free the people of Iran. What about the people of the United States? And a lot of independence are saying, yeah, what about that?

We thought he was going to take care of Americans first.

He seems to be doing everything for every other country except for us. Right. Yeah.

It's going to make people to say for place.

“And in the war run, if it all succeeds, it will reduce the amount that the we and the world”

have to, you know, pay on defense. Right. Yeah. You know, it is the correct thing to do to modernize Western civilization to democracies. Move them in that direction.

We are right. Coming up more with Gary McNamara and Eric Carly, it's Red Eye Radio.

He's are currently and I'm Gary McNamara.

Interesting to see whether, you know, who's going to cave on the whole DHS thing. I saw that Vance was off the oyster saying, look, we're willing to compromise.

“But Democrats are saying, give us everything or you get no funding.”

Right. It goes. But the DHS is funded through 2029. So what are you doing here? What you're saying is give us everything or we close down the department of Homeland Security

while we're at war and Iranian sleeper cells may be in the United States.

Right. But you can't win that. They believe they can't. This is Red Eye Radio on Westwood One.

“It's almost over the steuers, also the school-flashback.”

So steuers are my safe space. Do you have anything to say? Yes, exactly. So steuers are the steuers who just understand. There's a game, a job, or a car.

Steuers are the best. I don't feel like steuers. Steuers are loved. Save. With the steuers.

The Dan Bontino Show. Damn I missed you all. I've got so much content bottled of my head. I got a lot of stuff. This is the kind of stuff.

It's real. May not give this anywhere else. Hard truths. There's a lot of stuff to talk about. Then you think it's going to open a lot of eyes.

And a lot of ignorators are going to get shut down. And a bold perspective. No one else can offer. They are freaking out. It's the comeback.

Everyone's been waiting for. Lovers, haters, friends, supporters to track. There's your all welcome. I want to hear it all. The Dan Bontino Show.

Follow and listen on your favorite platform. You're there.