03-17-26 Part One - The Population Bombs

politics to social issues and news of the day, whether you're up late or you're just starting

your day.

“Welcome to the show from the Relief Factor Studios.”

He is Red Eye Radio. And we are Red Eye Radio. He is Eric Hurley, and I'm Gary McNamara. Good morning. All right.

Here we go. Tuesday show. You know, I don't know where to start out. You know, we got to start out with some of the interesting stuff that may not be at the top of the news, just because it's really interesting.

Oh, yeah. All right. Radio and article that Great Britain is looking to replace on their currency. Many of their great leaders like Winston Churchill and putting on wildlife instead. So of course, with the diversity movement in Great Britain, it's like, well, who's going

to figure out the wildlife, it just can't be the ones that people think are cute. We need to consider all wildlife, so there is actually a proposal out there. Now, it hasn't been finalized, a proposal to have a rat on the currency in Great Britain. I go for that on the palm. Can't all be ferrets and bunnies?

Yes. Can't be bunnies or, well, they can't use eagles. Yeah. Nobody can use an eagle. Yeah.

Represent. No, we have to debate them and take them over. So this is actually hard to bug. Yeah. Rats.

I go for that. Please make that happen. And then somebody had to bring up rats are not native to Great Britain apparently. Doesn't matter. I'm not like, aren't rats native to everywhere.

It's going to cool on on the bill. Go ahead, do it. Right. And we're not talking our ATT. Yeah.

No, not the band. Not the band. No. No. Not the band from the 80s.

No. No. Oh, my God. That's only currency on a cruise ship.

You know, when I saw over the weekend and just never got a chance to talk about it, that

Paul Ehrlich died last Friday, 93 years of age. Huge, when I was growing up, huge, I mean, seriously, the first Earth Day probably is because of the book that he wrote in 1968, which was the population bomb. The first Earth Day. I mean, to me, he was the father of not only the environmental movement, but the WACO

environmental movement. Yeah. Yeah. And this has him even still in 2023. Let me play.

He was on 60 minutes.

“I believe that we played this at the time and went, my God, he's been so wrong.”

We did. We did. We did. We went on for days. I think there were a couple of cuts that came out that week and that we played them.

And it was like, wait, it's been going on for years and he's been wrong every time. Right. Somebody, I was going through social media and there was a check. Yeah. It was a check for like $500 and something dollars.

And it was somebody who made a bet with him where, you know, was one of his, you know, June's day scenarios, what was going to happen when that day came along and it didn't happen. Right. Or like wrote him a check for $500, which was the amount of the bet plus interest over the year.

Oh. All right.

And it said, probably, it was written underneath it, probably one of the most important

checks ever written. Yeah. Right. You want to frame that one. But, but here he is, this is back in 2023.

When I first saw this, I'm playing this. I'm like, I don't know why I forgot that we had talked about it in 2023 and then it came back to me. Yeah. And, and I'm thinking to myself, wow, this is really interesting.

You know, it's a wide screen and it's, it looks, it's in color. And because I'm thinking the stuff he's saying is so wrong, I forgot that he said the same stuff in 2023, I thought this was back from 1971 or something. Even after.

“I think it was going wrong repeatedly, he was still saying in 2023.”

And I thought they might have cleaned this up, you know, in a digital form, it's like, well, now this is, and I look right in the corner, it says, 2023, it's right there in 2023. And I, oh, this was, hey man, we talked about this on the show. Yeah. All right.

Here we go. All right. Too many people, too much consumption and growth mania. At the age of 90, biologist Paul Erlick may have lived long enough to see some of his

You seem to be saying that humanity is not sustainable.

Well, humanity is not sustainable.

“To maintain our lifestyle, yours in mind, basically, for the entire planet, you need five”

more earths, not clear where they're going to come from. Just in terms of the resources that would be required. Resources that would be required, the systems that support our lives, which of course are the biodiversity that we're wiping out, humanity is very busy sitting on a limb that we're sewing off.

And where he said, you know, that, you know, some of the things that he has said have come true already. I don't know what the hell he was talking about. Yeah, the intro. Yeah.

I mean, it was just like, and we criticized it at the time. Right. Wait a minute. Right.

“Which is why we're happy Barry Weiss is a CBS exactly.”

But central to Erlick's thesis, this is from National Review in the, in his book, the population bomb that he wrote in 1968, was his intention that the earth had a finite caring capacity, and its limits were already being tested by the mid 20th century. So we're talking, by 1950, he's saying that. Right.

Yeah. Humanity would soon have to ration its resources and consign those for whom it could no longer care to triage his, his narrative fired the imaginations of the international environmental left, but he seemed compelled to forever up the ante on his dire predictions. He anticipated that by 1980, now this is back in 1968, and then he kept talking because

he was all over the place. I had him interviewed everywhere, and this is where really the WACO environmental left started. He said that by 1980, the average American lifespan would decline to just 42 years of age. I mean, you couldn't be, it's like the modern environment, the model WACO environmental

movement was created by somebody who was wrong on all of his predictions. Yeah. And we had said a couple of years ago, well, probably maybe 20 years ago, 30.

“I can't remember when I started saying it, but I went, when you proposed a hypothesis over”

and over again, which changed, you know, it's interesting, but when you hear Democrats now talking about, I mentioned this to you in our pre-show meeting, well, all this money were spending on defense and wars and everything else. Think of the trillions we've wasted over the last half century. And the WACO left us environmental movement.

Yeah. Oh, yeah. Oh, the cost, you've had a compounding cost. If you think about the cost of all industry, what industry had to do, based on regulation,

and how that's passed along in every industry basically had to comply.

That's a compounding cost. It's a lot like, and maybe even worse than the VAT tax, and it's hidden. And yet, we keep voting for people who want to keep doing this. I mean, look at what, just in recent years, look at what some of the EV mandates and some of the power mandates that were put in place by radical leftists, like Newsom, Biden, and

others, look at the cost of those and what it did to industry. They, OEMs came back on EVs and said, we got to quit making it. We can't be competitive. We can't survive by doing this. So the lifespan would be 42 years of age in 1980, most of the people who are going

to die in the history of man have already been born. He wrote in 1969.

The death rate will increase until at least 100 to 200 million people per year will be starving

to death in the next 10 years. That was in 1969. He declared, oh, I'm sorry, he declared the following year in 1970. By 1971, he was willing to take even money that England will not exist in the year 2000. I might have been the bet for the checkup, roughly 100 to 200 million people would die

of starvation between 1980 and 1989 in what he deemed the great die-off. As allies will concede, yeah, he got some things wrong, but the just of his works still rang true. Oh, it didn't, no, where population growth along with the overconsumption per capita is

He told the Guardian is recently a 2018 billions of people are now hungry or micro-nutrient

“malnourished and climate disruption is killing people with the confidence of a Marxist economist”

Erloc never questioned his faith in where humanity's addiction to prosperity was taking

it, as I've said many times, perpetual growth is the creed of the cancer cell he said. Erloc's work left much misery in his wake, even as Erloc supporters will emit his theories when support to racist attitudes for population control. Population bombers encourage the promotion of abortion in places like Sub-Saharan Africa and the Indian subcontinent overpopulation as a theory justified some of the worst.

You jenest abuses of the human species since World War II abuses in the United States was very much a participant, the large number of sterilizations began in earnest in 1966 when Medicaid came into existence and funded the operation for low-income people. The author Angela Franks wrote, indeed, by 1977, up to one quarter of Native American women's women had undergone sterilizations.

She wrote a program of voluntary sterilization, a Puerto Ricans in the 1960s, unfolded the same way. Erloc's primary contention that the human race is more or less doomed continues to inform the work of today's environmentalist, the various United Nations appendages that routinely warn us that our species, imminent collapse, a decade or so on from whenever the last report

was published, lean on Erloc's theories. The professors legacy inspired a 2018 initiative by a collection of bioethicis to rehabilitate the population bomb in the pages of the Washington Post as recently as 2023, CBS's 60 minutes as we just played when it's platformed to Erloc to promote groundless, doomsday scenarios.

The next few decades would be the end of the kind of civilization we're used to. He atolled a credulous, scott-pelly who didn't really fight back as we see at all. No.

Erloc never questioned his conclusions and refused to repent for the suffering that they produced.

“And think about it, you know, that's, to me, because that's, I remember he was, when I was,”

you know, this goes back, you know, we're, we're talking, you know, over half century ago, this goes back to when he was throwing out his garbage at 1968. Yeah, right. No, everything, I mean, that was all, that was all part of the thing that we're doomed, and it really didn't matter if we're going to lose hundreds of millions of people,

billions of people in the world, due to starvation because by the time we got to the year 1999, we'd all be working two or three day work weeks to begin with. Right. Yeah.

By the way, that never happened.

No, it didn't. And in 1989, when they sat on Capitol Hill and said, if you, by the year 2000, if you work in, in the belt inside the beltway in DC, you're going to have to take a gondola to work. That was, they don't, by the way, they only put 11 years on that, on that clock.

“That false clock, that was 1989, and remember it came out later that they went in and turned”

off the air conditioning in that room to make it a little warmer, which, by the way, is the advice that in later years, we didn't learn that until somebody came out with it after we had been saying, listen, quit going to these places in the winter, where it's 24 below zero. Nobody can get in for the ice, and you're doing a global warming summit. Yeah, you got to go to Augusta, Georgia in late August, inside an old theater that hasn't

been used in, I don't know, 200 years and has no air conditioning and have everybody where wool suits, then you can sit and promote your global warming, and they actually did that on Capitol Hill 1989, they turned the air conditioner down to make it make it a little sweaty or in the room. What I find, what I find really incredible is the way that they go, for example, it's like, you know, 1968, when you wrote the book, I mean, oh, it's just all over the place,

which that, well, excuse me, global cooling, which then became global warming, which then became climate change, and then became climate destruction, climate chaos, whatever, temporarily displaced

“climate, remember that. And, and then Al Gore's predictions, all of which never come true, and we”

asked the question, when you continually promote doomsday scenarios that never come true,

when is it a, when is it legitimate to question your scenarios when you've been wrong, every single time they never show up for a debate. No, they would never show up for a debate. Remember, at the time, there were, there was going to be this big global debate, and we said, look, don't listen to Eric and Gary, get the scientists from one side to sit across from the scientists on the other and have the debate based on data. Period. And they were going to have

that and they canceled it the last minute. And then, you know, Republicans jumped aboard, remember, was it, I think, what was it 2007, when Bush signed the ethanol mandate? Yeah, oh, you could go back to his father, I think, and that would have been 91, and Bush 41 signed, I mean, this has been going on for years. Well, it was like December of 2007, yeah, that he signed the ethanol mandate, the Democrats want, we were screaming. And of course, he ethanol industry was on our case.

Right. And we said, look, from farm to tank, you're probably producing more global warming

“gases in producing everything that you need to produce to do that. Yeah. We still have it today.”

We still can't get rid of it because it's a subsidy which will never end. That's a political

football that only gets bigger, right? And now Gordon admitted he lied about it. Yep, later on. Yep, because he was running and then president. Then Newt Gingrich sitting on the on the street bench or whatever was with Nancy Pelosi saying, we need to call Congress about climate change, everything else. And it was just like my God. Yeah. It was like the momentum starts moving, even though it's the big lie, right? It's hypothesis that they can't prove doesn't matter.

We are right, I radio brought to you by hot shot secret. Hi, I'm Jen Lumis, a transport safety

expert at JJ Keller at a roadside inspection inspectors may ask to see supporting documents.

“These documents can include bills of waiting, itineraries, schedules, or equivalent documents”

that indicate the origin and destination of each trip. They can also include dispatch or trip records, expense receipts related to on duty/notdriving periods, electronic mobile communication, transmitted through a fleet management system, and payroll records, settlement sheets, or equivalent documents that indicate payment to a driver. Drivers using paper logs must also keep tall receipts. Supporting documents must contain the driver's name, carrier assigned identification number,

or vehicle unit number that can be linked to the driver, the date, the name of the nearest city town of village, and the time. This template brought to you by JJ Keller and Associates. Visit us at JJ Keller.com. Mind of and for your calls, 866-9D-Red Eye on Red Eye Radio. Where, when I read you, he's here, honey, and I'm Gary McNamara. Look, we know there's a ton of other current event stories out there, but I thought it was worth talking about, you know,

Paul Ehrlich, who died at age 93 last Friday. Really, and I look at him as the father of the modern insane wacko environmentalist left movement in this country, just the predictions that he made, and where it took us, the fact that we, even in the United States and the world, live in a society that will run on fear. Yes, the world is going to end. That has no basis and credibility at all. All right.

Tired of partisan noise. America's more divided than ever, but independent Americans is adding the light to contrast all that she and dependent Americans daily news with army veteran Paul Rikha. Pressing issues of the day, the leaders who are shaping what America will be in the future. We're going to bring the righteous media five lives, independence, integrity, information, inspiration, and impact. Join the movement, independent Americans from belief,

Catch Renni Radio Live every night on the Renni Radio app available in the app store.

And he is our crony. I'm Gary McNamara, download our Renni Radio app today and you can listen, when and where you choose. I just saw this here for the New York Post. Fans were shocked on Monday when photos of Hollywood's Dolby Theatre hit social media showing how Hollywood's A-list celebrities who consistently cry about climate change and environmental issues left the theater looking like a pigsty of the theater shows, mounds of trash including water bottles, snack bags, and food debris,

and papers and programs sparked a backlash among fans the New York Post reported. I had the feeling they aren't fans of Hollywood. Yeah, I'm just letting it slide. Yeah, the fans would let it slide.

“I believe these are not fans. I believe these would be critics of the liberal left.”

Yeah, exactly. By the way, single use water bottles. Oh, I'm telling you now in LA, those are banned in parts of California. Wow, I don't even know how they, well, I'm sorry, they're rich,

they're elite. Never mind. Carry on. Single use. Not even single use. They just order it and

then never use it and just throw it away. Zero use. Oh, where? I mean, it's, it's, which tells you what? Everyone says, well, they're hypocrites. No, no, no, no, no, no, that's not the big thing. They don't believe the science. They don't believe in what they're pedaling to you up there on the stage when they're crying over their trophy. They just won. Wow, this is what a group of children. Since, since we're talking Hollywood, I mean, when I first see stories like this, I'm like,

“who cares? But no, no, it's important because we need to know the mentality. Yeah. Yeah.”

Actor, Jerry O'Connell revealed in a new interview that his wife and their daughters

became physical with him after Vice President Kamala Harris lost the 2024 presidential election. Wow. If I say this, will I stay married to stand by me and actor Joke on Bill Mars Club random podcast on Monday? O'Connell continued describing the night of the election where he insisted that he did not believe President Donald Trump would win. However, he recalled making off-hand remarks to his family during the night. I said something along the lines of there was no planning.

This is what they get. There should have been a primary. I said something along those lines.

“Like, I was just spitballing ideas. It was a shock. My wife and daughters without saying anything”

became physical with me. They were filled with rage. Wow, offer children. That's a learn to behave. You're from adults. Yep. He continued. So if I'm being careful with you, how I say things, yes, I live in California. I live with not one, not two, but three people if I made any kind of joke, they would become very, very angry with me. Bill Mars responded by saying, "He could not live this way." You know what? I don't know how old his daughters are. How old

is Jerry O'Connell? I don't know. I just don't know. Our daughter's old enough to vote. Be, they might be. Yeah. It's just, I found it weird that he was filling in on the morning show in New York City on one of the ABC 7 or something in New York City. And I didn't know this, but he had filled in with what's the Kelly and whoever's on with Kelly now, and the morning show used to be Regis and Kathy, and now it's Kelly and whoever's on with Kelly,

and he filled in there. But when I saw this, there was a story that was out of New York City, and they showed a picture, a thumbnail from the TV station, and Jerry O'Connell was one of the anchors, and like, what happened? What? When did he get in? And it just turned out he was just filling in.

My entire life, now when I was younger, the only thing that kept me from putting out my opinion

was the fact that I didn't know if I crossed all the teas and dotted the lowercase jays. You know, that was really it. But since I have, you know, done this professionally now,

“can you believe it's almost 44 years doing, doing radio, but 36 years doing this?”

Yeah, it will be 36 coming up doing this. You know, people that say they're afraid to give their opinions, yet he goes on opinion shows. Sure. I mean, think about this. I'm going on opinion shows, but I have to be very careful while giving my opinion, then get off. Then yeah, then don't, don't do that.

But what, what are you doing? And I just think of it except for one person, and you know who this person was, who was more of an acquaintance professionally? Uh, who, I don't know, maybe it was 13 years ago something like that. You know, made it clear, they were furious at my opinions, but could not articulate what opinions,

“which was, which made me laugh. I mean, I burst out laughing. It was like, are you kidding me?”

Yeah, but I have never felt the need ever.

Family, friends, cousins, my aunts and uncles, when the majority of them were alive, I have never felt. No, I don't go into a strange person's house and start screaming at them. Well, I do that. I do that for fun. But I've never been afraid ever to give my opinion to anyone, and I've never lost a friend. I've never lost one friend doing this.

Or a family member, not one. And I know, and believe me, there are those who disagree with me. But every time we have a discussion, when I explain it to them, well, here's how my thought process came from, they go, oh, yeah, I can understand that. I have friends of mine that claim there are as far left and only watch MS, excuse me, whatever it is now. MS now. And when I go to the issues to go, yeah, I agree with that. Yeah, I agree with that. Yeah, I agree

with that. I've got there are people that have been friends of mine. I mean, I don't associate with them every single day. But a lot of them are people I met in this business. But I still communicate with today. And I'll see once every couple of years when we get into, you know, political discussions that will tell me absolutely there are, you know, I'm far left and all I do is watch MS and MS now. And when I talk to them, they agree with me on everything.

“And I really think that they have, when they were young, they claim that they were liberal and”

even though they're not liberal, they claim they're liberal today. And all they watch are liberal shows. But when you actually talk to them and break down the issues, they're not liberal, which blows my mind. How can you be an adult and think you're one thing unless they're afraid to tell me the truth? But I think a lot of people are. Would they be afraid to tell me the truth? I think a lot of people are not a neighbor who was clearly on the left and then

and this happened. This was during the years. There were like several years when leftists, some leftists were saying, oh, I'm a libertarian because they didn't want to say that they were radical left and you're nowhere near a libertarian. The libertarian party isn't libertarian anymore. So you're definitely not a libertarian. And I love that when people try and hide from what they are, oh, well, no, I'm a libertarian. Now, having said that, you and I also have a hard time

finding out other people's definitions of conservative. Oh, yeah. Because it seems to be a matter of opinion, which it's not. But with some people, it's their populace and say that

they're, or they're more moderate and say they're conservative. See, I never view

radio or whatever they go, I'm not going to argue with them. But I actually don't view myself as being intimidating. Maybe I can be on the radio when, you know, you get me angry.

That doesn't take much. By Gary, what? By the blame you for that. I mean, I've never viewed

myself ever as intimidating. And it was interesting because, uh, independent bob ones told me he said, you know, you don't even know that you're a radio talk show host. He goes, it's like that's a separate thing. Because you don't even realize that when you start debating with people, they're like, you know, they're like, oh my God, I can't debate him. Because you don't view yourself as Gary McNamara, the dog show host. And I went, when he said that to me, it actually made sense

“because I don't. And I think you think the same way, you go, I mean, you go home and you start”

a call to the other day and you never got back to me until the afternoon because you were out

doing your lawn work from nine until three. Uh, eight until three. Yeah. Oh, yeah. Sorry, I got it wrong. Yeah. And hour out there. But, and, and so it's like we, we live, you know, we're not in the circle of media. We're not in, we're not inside the beltway. We don't hang around with all media people. We don't, you know, we don't, uh, go to the Friday and Saturday night parties with, you know, celebrities because we're based in New York or Washington or whatever. And we have no,

neither of us, we've never really discussed as much, neither of us have any desire to do so. No. And so we love doing this. And yes, it's a part of who we are. But when I'm out of here, I don't view myself as an intimidating force to anybody that I'm having any kind of discussion with. And the vast majority of my discussions with people outside the radio show are not what I do in the radio. Yeah. Right. Yeah. Yeah. No, that's actually I, I, everything that I am on the air,

it's just who I am. So it's, you know, there's this thing about back in the day, there was, there was one guy that that was a consultant and he had these seminars. But it was a an unwritten rule in radio. You leave it at the door. You know, there's something going on in your personal life. Leave it at the door. Don't take it with you. Right. But in talk radio, it becomes something very different. You can't leave, I mean, you leave certain, a lot of things at the door, but you can't

leave everything at the door. You've got to bring who you are, I think, because it constitutes what your convictions are. In order, in order for you to come off as somebody

“with conviction, I think you have to have certain life experiences or knowledge or education or”

all the above. And it varies by person. I mean, there are some very highly educated individuals in our industry that do a a great job and people have different experiences. And mine is, is what it is. You know, and it's, I'm, I don't want to come off as somebody that I'm not, because I'm not a person that would attend gatherings and say, oh, I'm just, you know, hanging out with, you know, rubbing elbows with whoever, you know, or, you know, for me, again, it has to be

because I think it's important. It has to be about understanding the foundation of this nation

and it was never the intent of our founders to make it about the elites. Only the elites know,

only the elites can understand. Only the elites get it and the elites have to teach the common folk. No, it wasn't that it started with the common folk and the peasants exactly. And, you know, and the weak shell and hair at the earth is something that keeps going through my, my brain, is that it's the everyday people that, you know, I had someone tell me one time and he's an actor. And he said, I'm an actor and you're on the radio. Our jobs are an important, which was a gut

punch to me. But he said, the people out there, the plumbers, the truckers, the police officers, the nurses, you know, doing all these jobs had a required for a society. You know, having a full

“understanding of a society is, I think, required for being here. And I don't want to rub elbows with the”

elites because, you know, that's not my life. Number one, and number two, that doesn't give you the, the good experience. We are right, I radio. We'll be right back with more red eye radio with every currently

We are what I radioed. He is our calling. I'm Gary McNamara. Welcome in good morning. So, I just thought

“there was really interesting. And when I saw that article about Jerry O'Connell claims, you know,”

on the Bill Mar podcast, that he's got to be very careful about what he says because his family might get physical with him. Get physical, I just thought. Well, it sounds like he wanted her to win, and he wasn't making the argument. He wasn't celebrating that she was losing. You know, that should have been, you know, saying it, there should have been a primary, it should have been better

organized and everything else. Hey, do you want to hear it? And by the way, that was what everybody

on the left was saying. Yeah. After she lost him.

“Out to the hour news is brought to you by how product is at howproducts.com. This is Red Eye Radio on Westwood 1.”

Now, it's Red Eye Radio. Gary McNamara and Eric Hurley talk about everything from politics to social issues and news of the day. Whether you're up late or you're just starting your day, welcome to the show from the Relief Factor Studios. This is Red Eye Radio.

All across America, we are Red Eye Radio. He is here at Curly and I'm Gary McNamara.

Welcome in good morning. Thank you for being here. Made it to a Tuesday. Made it to a Tuesday. It's only Tuesday. Yeah. You know, driving in, I thought it was Wednesday. Oh, well, normally I like to start at this point. Yeah, normally I like it when it's reversed. Oh, yeah. When I, when I, when I think it's a Monday and it's a Tuesday. It's St. Patrick's Day. You know what that means, right? Oh, look at this. What do you, yeah. What are you wearing there?

What do you got? Oh, wow. Green underwear. Put your pants back on, dude. No, it's a T shirt that says Shamrock's and shenanigans. Yes. All right. Remember, Shamrock is my name in that independent mockumentary. Right. Yeah. Mockumentary, mockumentary. Mockumentary. Yes.

“That's why. Yeah. I haven't done any scenes for that in a while. Hmm. It's been a month or two since we've done a scene.”

All right. I don't know where it's going yet. Okay. I don't know if I'm going to be whacked or not in the mockumentary. Yeah, I was very complicated situation. Shamrock. Yeah, Shamrock. He's smart. Not like everybody says I'm not like everybody says. Like the eye of Tola. Like the eye of Tola. It's okay. So, okay. I got you. Okay. All right. You're ready. Before you go. Okay. Go ahead. Go ahead. Babylon B. Yeah. I had Tola disappointed to learn 72 virgins awaiting him in paradise are all women. Well, so the story got out or should I say the story

came out? It's out of the closet that the new eye of Tola, the being the deceased eye of Tola's son is gay according to Intel officials and that the former eye of Tola didn't want him for to be eye of Tola. He actually had picked the former president who was killed in a helicopter crash last year. Right. He's he as the eye of Tola. That was the one he thought he was going to be the best person to take on the supreme leader job after his passing. Well, right. He died in a helicopter

crash immediately by the way is rarely said after that crash that we didn't do it. We didn't do it. There are some questionable things about that crash, but nonetheless the former president of Randide and that crash and he was apparently the number one pick of the former eye of Tola who who died because we killed him. Well, the eye of Tola's son who, by the way, has not been seen. There haven't been any videos or anything. Only statements read by state media and and other

officials there in a ran, but no video of him and it's thought that he may have been injured in the

had had to have his leg amputated and and then the president suggested yesterday or recently

“according to reports that he may not even be alive. So then you get into the okay, why not him?”

There was at first the the mainstream global media was saying he was because he was too young and I

thought. By the way, I'm a dinda jod was another one that was a hard liner that was kind of on the shortlist of supreme leader maybe not now, but down the road. And I'm a dinda jod was also killed in the and the before another former president was also killed in the in the initial attack. But then the story got out or came out yesterday, started to really circulate yesterday that during an intel briefing the president was told that the new iatola is gay and that this

“comes from high level sources inside the Iranian government. And it's interesting because”

then CBS had a story yesterday that was a long these lines never mentioned the whole thing about

him possibly being gay or rumored to be gay or any of that. They said that his father said he was not smart enough. I'm smart not like everybody says right that he wasn't a bright individual. He wasn't didn't have the makings of a supreme leader and he had had other personal problems is the way CBS news phrased it. Well this got out and you know it's funny I said someone yesterday I said this is one of

those in you and I said you said the same thing to me in the pre-show meeting. This is one of those things whether it's true or not. If he is still alive this rumor is going to be impossible to disprove and of course in that culture but especially in that role as Iran's sub-new supreme leader it is paramount that they do disprove it but they won't. There's no way to disprove something like this so it could be complete propaganda it might or might not be true but it's one

of those things you can't unsee. The culture can't unsee it. The world can't unsee it and it's

always going to remain again if he's still alive. Did you foreign minister say anything about the

story not being true? No but I would expect it to be rejected by the by their you know because when I saw this I went wow CIA disinformation at one I mean it might be true I don't know. I mean CIA may have picked up on this that you know inside you know the leadership of Iran they've known this and that he is gay and the whole point would be at that point from the CIA is to take their homophobia and use it against them right at this time where they're like well we can't you know we know

it's true and now that the world knows it's true we can't do this we've got to find somebody else

“if he's even alive. Here's the CBS News version of this and the important part in the CBS News”

version of this this actually goes back to date before they posted this date before yesterday but the analysis showed this again this is from CBS News.com the analysis showed the the elder homine the the former supreme leader was wary of his son the new Iotala ever taking power because he was perceived as not very bright and was viewed as unqualified to be leader according to sources. The information gathered also indicated that the father was aware that the

son had issues in his personal life and that's as far as they go in the CBS story and well you would think that in a situation like like this that the personal life outside of something that is absolutely rejected in an Islamic theocracy that anything else wouldn't matter but this would matter and so you use it against them even if it's a rumor you picked up in the

whether it's disinformation or not you use it against the regime anything to destabilize what

“might be going on right now and if there is anything that could destabilize it again it doesn't have to”

be true it only has to be widely believed yeah and there's a difference we know that we know that in modern day politics even in the United States it doesn't have to be true it's just had to be believed Russia collusion the Russia collusion hoax it just has to be and that that was in fact that was the very clintonesque touch that Hillary put on that because there was technically an FBI investigation going on when she went to the leftist media and said hey the FBI is looking into

Trump working with the Russians because at that time they were only because she fed the FBI false information she didn't tell them that part but there was technically you know that was the whole

“thing is that well the FBI is looking into it and then all of a sudden now you've got the the”

liberal activist media that's all they need right that need any truth right that the that the the FBI was investigating the fact that Trump was communicating with the Russians through alpha bank right and and that was all fed by the Hillary campaign to the lawyers to the FBI it was in true it wasn't true at all and and then she said see the FBI's investigating the Trump's ties to alpha bank yet you created that yeah you're the reason they're investigating that

you created the lie and they're investigating what turned out to be a lie and think about that

in American history yeah she has never done an interview where she has been confronted with that

right where everyone knows it's fact right and no one in the mainstream media will ever do an interview with her and get her in an interview and even and and even you know when she doesn't think it's going to come up from a friendly interview where they bring it up that probably hasn't happened in American history because you think about it probably one of the biggest presidential presidential race political scandals in American history where one candidate

attempted to set up another candidate with a complete lie that basically the other candidate had committed treason and had it so specific as to these things that happened that they created the

entire lie yes to to set him up and she's never been confronted with that ever ever and and you notice

you because you bring up a very why has this ever been confronted in what she hasn't she hasn't made any appearances except Ron MSN well I must now why are the Republicans concerned about Epstein and not bringing her forth on those I don't know I don't know yeah because it is a massive massive if you talk about the you know the the fraud that was involved how could the level of manipulation at the highest level as a former secretary of state who had every door open for her

still at that point and was of course running for president of former first lady there was she had access to to people at every level in order to create such a hoax and she did and our intelligence agencies and the FBI knew she was going to do it yes they knew she was going to toss it up from yes we know that now it's like unbelievable and it's like guys why have you ever pulled her in right and questioned her about this right Epstein she wasn't involved in it I want to care but she is

bring it's the think about it water gate no was like amateur hour yes I mean it was nothing it was nothing burger right compare to what Hillary right and there's like the city attempted to do to just set up because the equivalent of 12 bill mac or or a insect bill mac or a friend bill mic bill Clinton going to Mac Donald's and stealing somebody's fry yeah you know that was that I know

“was an SNL bit not real life but that's that's how small that was it probably not that's a good”

person nobody was the equivalent of taking some but one of somebody's fries you know sitting next to you you know compared to what the Hillary scandal was and how many different laws that were broken and what did what did the one you know what the one lawyer that that actually went to trial

of the only juror that went online said well doesn't matter whether you lied there are bigger

“problems there are bigger problems it's like wow yeah there are bigger by jury's than lying”

to the mass of jury nullification oh my gosh insane insane and and so you know and and so we're just trying to make the the the the point that if in the United States yeah you can completely set up someone yeah with the basis of nothing being the truth at all in it which was Trump and Russia collusion nothing was true was all thought there was no colluding with the Russians at all and who can create a drama and a paranoia that existed in the Democratic Party

we're still today you and I are saying what if they did a poll with Democrats today do how many Democrats would still believe because it was over 50% just a few years ago right that's still believe the Russian collusion happened long after that's disproven then in a

“paranoid society like a ran inside their government especially now yeah this type of rumor”

that oh the new I told is gay yeah whoa there's no way to disprove that there's no way to undo this because too many people will either they will be at different levels of belief

some will disbelieve it always then some will believe it could be true which means they've

opened the door and in their mind they're wondering and then others will believe it's true and that will be the level it's it's almost like the absteen thing they if you came out and proved anything or you came out with a bunch of information that disproved all this or that it wouldn't matter there were there would still be a group people saying oh no it's a cover up in this case it's kind of the opposite no it's they can say

“he's not but I think he is it actually got reversed yes yeah reverse because it was Trump and ever”

we're going to destroy the Democrats I'm not seeing destroy the Democrats I'm not seeing destroy the destroy the Democrats the next scene Trump takes over yeah the Department of Justice said now there's nothing there with that's nothing the Democrats reversed it the Republicans are trying to hide something there were and then the Republicans are out there going but you didn't cover it for four years so if you didn't if you didn't go after Trump for this there's nothing

there and it doesn't matter whether the truth not was out there or not it's never going to be resolved

it's like it's like the Kennedy assassination right you're never going to come to a conclusion exactly ever we are big foot we are right I we are right I radio this morning's USDA farm report is brought to you by house products tested trusted guarantee since 1920 notable news from USDA's latest monthly beat production at price forecast world agricultural outlook board chair Mark Jack andowski says first based production this month we lowered 110 million pounds based on

recent slowdown in slaughter rates USB production is also forecasted lower year over year pork production meanwhile kind of holding steady with where we were in February with updates expected it late March from USDA's quarterly hogs and pigs report broiler production is up month over month and year over year while turkey production for a cast are lowered from the prior but based on hatchery data add some lingering impacts of HPAI calling that is cut into the production outlook

to some degree beat prices beat while mostly rose from the previous month with broilers the load exception as USDA forecast a 1% per pound declined in broilers in March I'm Rod Bay in reporting for the US Department of Agriculture in Washington DC this report brought to you by Senox fuels and loops yet in touch with Red Eye radio toll free at eight six six monkey red eye we are when I radio and he's are probably and I'm Gary McNamara I'm waiting for the

Washington Post or New York Times headline tomorrow not that there's anything wrong with that and and talks about that that if they believe that it's true that the new iatola is gay that this shows that the homophobic Trump administration is trying to use this against the Iranian leadership and it shows their liberalism and their tolerance for having a gay iatola and that the Iranian government and the Iranian society over the last 50 years is actually a lot

more advanced society than the Trump administration is leading the United States well then the liberals would be very outspoken against going after a red you know if it if it then yeah and

focused on a guy who happens to be Jewish and supports Israel's side voting wow

seriously and you guys wonder if we love our I mean there's just so many stories out there that there just had so many different levels of intrigue in today's world I can't imagine doing anything else you know you're a star in the school of the school of the school of the school of the school of the school of the school and then you're a student Paul, no, garney, like a star is my safe space, you know, you're all right, yeah, exactly like a star is like a star that's a lot of work to understand a girl at the studio, job or to stand, I don't think I'm a star, a star, a leader, a star with like a star

you're listening to Red Eye Radio from the Relief Factor Studios and I'm Gary McNamara along with the

“Eric Harley coming up in just a minute and a half or so I think I know what the compromise is going”

to be on the whole Department of Homeland Security funding. I think I know it's all headline yesterday and said I think I know what it's going to be. Okay, I can't wait to hear this. Are you one of those people that worries about things out of your control, lots of things in the world today are out of our control, it can be frustrating. There is one thing within your control that is controlling your pain with relief factor. I know this because I've done it. I wouldn't be endorsing this product if I didn't see it

for myself. I'm getting those results and I want you to get the same results. There are so many things in life that you can't control. You can control your pain with relief factor. It's a 100% drug-free

“research-based formula for key ingredients going to work to help the body's natural inflammatory”

response function. Wow, 100 million Americans suffer from ongoing pain. Don't be one of those any more

put relief factor in your life. Start with a three week quick start. Just 1995, visit reliefactor.com or call 800, the number four relief. Relieffactor.com or 800, the number four relief. Use red eye at the drop down for your three week quick start at 1995. When I saw the headline yesterday, that said, I think it was Fox. Change of tone here. It goes Democrats now saying they want D.A. at DHS funded. They're ready to vote for funding it, but they won't fund dice.

And I went, well, they don't have to fund dice. Ice is already funded. Right. And I went, wow, that's their out. That's their out. I think that's where they're going to go. That we will fund all of the Department of Homeland Security, but we will not vote to fund ice.

“You don't need to vote to fund dice. It's already funded. But that's how they'll get out of it.”

And that's what they'll use when they're campaigning because they believe that their rank and file is stupid. Right. And won't look into the fact that it's already funded. It's already funded. No, I thought that's it. I think that's it. When I saw it, it was, I think it was like something a change of direction Fox had it. And it was like Schumer and other Democrats now in the Senate saying that they are willing to vote and fund the Department of Homeland Security, just not ice.

And I went, well, you don't have to fund dice. It's already funded. Right. That's been the entire point, the entire time. You actually, if they do that, they make the Republicans point. But it doesn't matter. They believe the people that vote for them. Remember now. Yeah. And we came up with this a couple of weeks ago. And this was all because you had both Gavin Newsom and Bernie Sanders, come out and say, we don't know how to get a person. They're

very good. We have no idea how to get a person to begin. Now they're lying. Of course, they know how to get a person to begin. They could not be in the positions where they are. They couldn't travel the way they travel. They, you know, they, they couldn't go around the world like they do. Unless they knew how to find their burst certificates. They're lying. But we have figured the

We're stupid. Yeah. You're stupid. Yeah. We're the stupid people that represent the stupid people.

That's it. They finally realized that they're going to be called racist if they continue

to sit there and say, minorities are idiots. They don't know how to do anything. Right. Yeah. So they've got to change. And so there are new changes. All right. We've got to be got to not be. We can't come across as racist. Even though we are, that's identity politics. But we, if we continue to say that minorities are too stupid and don't have the capability to do simple tasks that Americans are doing, that the response is going to be racism, which is already

is conservative. Right. Conservative people that are minorities, they've already said that you're being racist about this. They've come up with a new thing. Wow. We don't need to pressers anymore.

The only oppressor is the Republicans because they're smart. Not like everybody says. Right.

They're smart. We're idiots. Yeah. And we're the idiots protecting the idiots. Yeah. And so we're all victims and the only oppressor are the smart Republicans who think they're smart. We know we're dumb and we're representing the dumb Americans out there because we're dumb too. Yeah. And even the band Green Day thinks people that Americans are idiots. Right. Exactly. Right. See, Green Day. Exactly. Another liberal example. And so yeah, they consider and they can think

“well, that's what we do. That's how we get out of it. We simply say, we're funny in the”

Department of Homeland Security, but not one Democrat has voted for funding ice. He just didn't

then Republicans go, because it's funded already. It doesn't matter. That's how they get out of it.

I don't see another way out of it. I don't, you know, you see what's going on now. And it's not just all because of the TSA because I know in some airports you can get through in some airports. It's horrible. Austin for example, you just keep seeing it every day. It's like four AM at Austin. Yeah. I already told my my sister. I said, you know, if it's this bad, if it they don't settle this by the time it's my father's 100 birthday, I may not be able to make it in. Yeah.

And all because you can get to the airport. Right. You know, it all depends what it might be. That's another three weeks. I think for me. But I think that with the weather, you go on social media. I was getting frustrated yesterday. I couldn't find out the news it was going on because every other than person on Twitter was somebody who was stuck from somewhere saying, Hey, American Airlines. Hey, Southwest. Hey, United. Hey, whoever is left out there.

Yeah. We can't get, we've been here for 24 hours. We're, you know, and then there was a story of the so a cheerleading group or something. I don't know where they're from a cheerleading group somewhere they're like 50 of them or, you know, they're they're looking for donations because they had a cheerleading thing in in Florida and they can't get out and they don't know when they can get out because of the horrible weather that we're having. By the way, we have a freeze warning tonight and by this week

“and it could be 95 to 100. Yeah. Yeah. That's right. And that's why posted on X. I posted posted on X.”

Global warming, global cooling, global warming, cooling, warming, warming, cooling, golfing. Yeah. Yeah, 95. Yeah. That may be too hot for me to go. I got a big reunion coming out with my buddies from Del Rio this weekend. Oh, really? That's true. Yeah. And it's, and the guy who owns the place we're going to be at somehow knew like a month ago that we were going to have freezing temps because then it showed that this past weekend, we were going to have freezing temps that

he said, and that's probably a little cold. We'll make it the next weekend, right, the weekend of the 20. It's like 95 degrees. We're a bunch of old guys. I mean, we're all roughly 60. You know, and it's like, there's only so much you're going to be able to do like in three or four in the afternoon. Now, we're going to be in the shade with the smoker going and, you know, hanging out, we'll be fine, but 95 degrees, maybe even higher. But you see with all the, with all the weather travel on top of

“the TSA, and then you see that the TSA people are going to food banks. Yeah. And then I think it was”

corn in that was trying to bring food to the TSA, you know, agents. Right. Yeah. It's campaigning. Yeah, right. And, and so you see all this going. And I'm like, you know, I saw Trump, let me play this shot. Let me play this audio cut from Trump. This is a reporter asking him about that 80% of the Department of Homeland Security terrorism investigators are working with Al Payne, not just TSA, but those investigators for the Department of Homeland Security

I remember it was really where I not CNN. We just want to ask about DHS still not funded,

but we reported earlier today that 80% of the primary task force that focused on investigating terrorism is working without pay. So should that impact the rest decision? We have to deal. They just said we're not going to pay. We're not going to do anything. And it's terrible. The Democrats are terrible. You know, it'd be nice to get along, but for years this has been going on, not just with me, for years this has been going on. Different ideology, but also different tactics.

Here we are. We're fighting big battles with a very tough enemy and winning nicely. And when I left after security in that country, it's crazy. You can't win that. You can't win. No. When it's out there, when you're talking in the

“pen and say, well, look, the ice is already funded through 2029. What are you, what are you doing?”

You're just keeping it so Americans aren't protected. Why are you doing this? Why are you

inconveniencing Americans? And and somebody brought this up the other day. I forgot who brought it up to Democrats. What's it on the Sunday morning news shows, maybe? Just popped into my mind now. And it was to Democrat. You're any one. Christy, no one was gone. Yeah. Yeah. He said, now, the thing is they know that home is just working and still, you know, going after people. And it doesn't, it doesn't matter that, you know, if, if you're somebody who is illegally

working in this country, I brought you that story about what happened at, you know, they're building the new Buffalo Bill Stadium. They found five people. You know, ice that were working illegally. I don't know whether they were criminals or not, but they overstayed their visas. And is the allegation. And if so, they're gone. So he's still doing it. He's just not doing it. And I really

“believe, I truly believe that Miller and Nome thought they wanted the public confrontations on the”

street. They thought that would get the public behind them. And it had the opposite effect. Yeah. But they were asked, he said, look, you won. I forgot it was being asked a question, Schumer. You won. Christy, no one's gone. Yeah. Right. Home and stake, you know, taking over. Right. You saw the head of the, uh, the, uh, border patrol resigned or retired. Yeah. Yeah. He's retiring after nearly 30

years. He's basically the, uh, the chief patrol agent. So he's the chief in the field, basically.

And, and the whole point is independent. You want to win this within independent independence. They're going, well, look, they've changed everything. Yeah. They're doing what we want them to do. You know, uh, with with home and up there. Because you don't hear any criticism now. There's, have you heard any criticism of home and at all? No. Nothing. No. Not one. No. It's like so independence look at it and go, what are you doing? Ice, ice is already funded.

So 20, 29. He's just hurting people. Why are you hurting people? Yeah. Greg Bavino. Yeah. Yeah. Who was very present during the whole Minnesota thing, uh, reassigned. He's basically, he's commander, uh, served as commander at large. Uh, so basically in the field, he's the commander. Right. And he's retired, right? And he's retired after nearly 30 years. Right. So, so it's, it's like, they was like, you won. What do you, why are you doing this? What's what? What's the point?

Ice is already funded. And so you're simply doing this. And, and so I think that that after I saw that head, and it was, I saw the headline yesterday. And it was like Democrats now coming up. They're changing their tune. And they're saying we want to fund. We want to get a vote. And we wish to fund DHS, but we're not going to fund ice. All you have to do is vote not to fund ice. Right. Yeah. Yeah.

Because they're funded already. They're already funded. And there's no pain. And you still get the claim victory.

“And I think that's what probably they will do. And then just believe that look, you know,”

our whole philosophy is worst stupid. Well, that's sort of stupid. Yeah. Well, worst stupid. Because we're the stupid leading the stupid. We're the stupid party leading the stupid is the narrative now. The Democrats are promoting. Yeah. We're not calling them stupid. That's what they're communicating to their constituents. I want to make that clear. Yeah. Right. Now, I believe the Democrats are lying when they're saying that they're stupid and don't know

how to get a person. If they get in don't know, you know, really what's going on. And don't know how to explain any issue out there. They can't explain any issue because nobody will buy what they're attempting to sell. No. And so, and so they just pretend, we're democratic party. We're the party of stupid leaders leading stupid people. Yep. I mean, there's no better and honestly, it's so that that is so a Schumer move.

Right. Isn't it? I know. I mean, it fits the entire party. But that is right out of Chuck's

Yeah. I think you're right. I think we're pretty close. I think this will be

“yeah. I think this will be what it will see how close we are. Yeah. We are right. I radio.”

Coming up more with Gary McNamara and Eric Carley. It's right. I radio. We are right. I radio. He's are currently and I'm Gary McNamara. The only question would be how long will, did I say it, Eric Carley? I don't know. I don't think that's I don't.

I don't think that's I don't. I don't know. Yeah. Yeah. It's. I don't want to have people

believe that I'm ignoring you. Yeah. You just don't want to, I wanted to get out this state.

“I'm ignoring you. So, I won't care. I just don't know how long Democrats will hold out on it. But I do”

think that's where they're going to go. And I just saw the headline saying Democrats now saying they wish to fund because even after the vote last Thursday, yeah. Slotkin came out and said,

oh no, we wish to fund DHS. And I went, okay, here's the beginning of it. And over the week

and you saw more of it than Fox had the story yesterday. Yeah. Democrats changing tune. Yeah. And it's like, well, we'll see. But when they said we wish to fund DHS. But we're not going to vote to fund ICE. I'm like, well, you can do that. Yeah. Right. You know, you're you're still, I mean, that ICE is funded. Yeah. I mean, Jeffries is according to the hill.com. Jeffries is looking to force the vote on DHS funding without ICE and CBP. Okay. They're funded. Yeah.

Yeah. And that was the other story that I saw. Thank you for bringing that one up. Yeah. Yeah. It's like, well, yeah, they're okay. All right. Great. Which, by the way, is them on record fighting to reopen the borders as well? Yes. Think about that. Yeah. This is Red Eye Radio. On Westwood One. I'm Teresa and my experience in all entrepreneurs

“started with Shopify. I believe that Shopify is already the first day. And the platform”

makes me no problem. I have a lot of problems, but the platform is no one from the bottom. I have the feeling that Shopify has its platform continuously optimized. Everything is super simple, integrated and balanced. And the time and the money that I can't wait for is not underway to invest in. For all of them, in VACS TOOM. Now it's the cost of those tests of Shopify. The Dan Bongino show.

Damn, I missed you all. I've got so much content bottled up my head. I got a lot of stuff. This is the kind of stuff. It's real. May not hear this anywhere else. Hard truths. There's a lot of stuff to talk about, then you think it's going to open a lot of eyes and a lot of ignorators are going to get shut down. And a bold perspective, no one else can offer. They are freaking out. It's the comeback. Everyone's been waiting for.

Lovers, haters, friends, supporters to track is you're all welcome. I want to hear it all.