[Music]
Now, it's Red Eye Radio, Gary McNamara, and Eric Hurley talk about everything from
“politics to social issues and news of the day, whether you're up late or you're just”
starting your day. Welcome to the show from the Relief Factor Studios. This is Red Eye Radio. All across America we are Red Eye Radio. He is Eric Hurley and I'm Gary McNamara. Good morning. Welcome. Thanks for being here this morning. Happy Monday.
Yes. Always looking for things that don't make sense. Audio cuts that don't make
sense. All right. We've had so much fun with audio cuts the last couple of days. Yeah. By the way, the show never ends. It just continues. We take long coffee breaks in between. Yeah. This was just a long, very long. It's not, don't call it a weekend. It's just a long break. But Democrats seemingly having a problem with the whole TSA thing that will get into the specifics about ice at airports. You just see
“home and on CNN. How can you do this in just 24 hours? We have ice at the airport already.”
Just expand our presence. We're ready there. Right. We're at airports. All across the
country. Right. Because we just expand our, our, our rolls. Our, basically, our rolls.
Right. These are well trained people. They can look at IDs. Yeah. They can, they know how to screen. Right. They can be an exits. Yep. You know, it's like they won't be doing everything. But the, helping out. Yeah. But the vast majority of things, they are absolutely qualified, you know, to do. And, and I'll say that. That was when, when I heard Trump did that I went, that's really good. The question that I did get, I know I'm getting
off topic. We'll get back to the, the audio cutting just a second. First question I got from people I know was, what can he do that? Absolutely. Absolutely. Can. How can he? Because
“they're all part of the Department of Homeland Security. Right. Yeah. If, and you can look”
and say what's going on, these airports is a crisis. And he simply says, okay, we're going to take, we're all under the same department. We're going to take these people. And we're going to move them over here. Yep. And it's that simple. Right. Emergencies like this, you probably could call off the national guard for something like this. Yeah. But he said, no, let's call out ICE agents because they're more trained, you know, more trained,
you know, to do this specific thing. It's more of a plug-in play kind of application. Yeah. Because they're at airports, you know, already. So we'll get to more of that. And some of the audio from Tom Holman, but this is the Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Fry talking about, I'm not even going to give you, I'm not even, this is about TSA and what's going on. I'm not even going to try to explain what he says. We'll just play it. Right. Right. Here we go. Right. Right.
If the goal here was safety at airports, he could hire out more TSA agents that do an
incredible job at keeping our airports safe. What? Does he know what's going on? Does he have any
idea what is actually happening? And that was an MSNL. Yeah. Oh, well, yeah. Well, there you don't have to sound like you know what you're talking about. So what do you, hey, we want to hire you now. Look, you, you really, the TSA, you've got a, you've got a ton of security here as long as you don't expect any payer benefits. Yeah. Hey, listen, you know, put yourself in the interviews situation, right? So where do you see yourself in five years? By the way, we start you at zero
pay for now. And I'm sorry, what? Yeah, zero pay for now. We have no money to pay. The money isn't there right now. Yeah. And your colleagues aren't getting paid either. The people that will be training you. Also not getting paid. So it, it almost reminds me of of when I first, this is going back home, 50 years ago. When I first was attempting to get into radio speaking, I'm not getting paid. Yeah. And, and I would sit there and say, wow, look at this job down here. It's on the Florida
beaches. It says we don't pay much, but you've got wonderful Florida beaches. Right. And even as a young person, I said, if I don't have money, I'm not going to be able to enjoy the Florida beaches to the full extent that I would like to enjoy them. So I'll take that job in trying to find the coldest place in the international falls. Yeah. That pays more money, but yeah, that you sit there, listen, you go, it doesn't make sense. And one of the narratives we
Had last week was we're played audio cuts of Democrats going, it doesn't make...
make any sense. Right. They're not even making any, they're just blurting out words. All right,
“just have one word after another, just blurred it out. And hopefully we'll get somewhere with this.”
Yeah, it's, again, it's, it's the clueless leading the clueless. Now, they believe again on the left that that their constituency American people are stupid, that Democrat voters and pretty much all Americans are stupid. We don't believe you're stupid. We believe that you are some of people, some people. I don't know about how many in our audience, but we're trying to get Scott Rasmussen to pull that
our ignorant, willfully ignorant, where you don't pay attention, where you go out of your way
to not pay attention. I was telling you, I was at a reunion with guys I've known since grade school, over the weekend. And they've got their nose to the grindstone. I mean, they don't,
“you know, they don't see. And it's just a reminder of how most people live. You and I”
and people that listen to our show and everything else and, and really, you know, they're, they're, we're walks. And this is kind of, I mean, I guess, almost like a hobby. For me and you, we love doing it. So it's a hobby that we get paid a little bit of money for. And and we're billionaires, slightly more than TSA is making right now. And the, the, the whole idea, you know, is, and I thought to myself, you know, it's, and of course,
reunions aren't for that. I mean, you get into the warliest discussions. There were a couple of those and they were very good. And everything was great. But willfully ignorant is different. That's when you, because what I would include there is when people, you know,
“grow stuff on social media. But they go out of their way to not being informed. Now, I don't know”
if the mayor here, not Mayor Fry is, willfully ignorant. If he knows the facts and just wants to sound stupid, you know, that's another thing on the left. Sounding stupid is in. Yeah. I don't even know where my birth certificate is. Yep. Newsom, who he's burning. Yeah. You know, we're, we're this, we're the stupid party. Yeah, representing the stupid people. By the way, we're not making that allegation. Right. We're just observing what the Democrats are communicating.
Yeah. Right. Right. Right. Yeah. And it's, it's, so I don't know, or Mayor Fry is just stupid, or ignorant, or both, or all the above. I have no idea. I know on the left they love, to keep their rank and file voters on the left. Ignore it. And it's been that way for years. And what you hear there in that comment is just pure ignorance. And it's, you know, again, I picture myself saying that on television, you know, it's MS now. They have like dozens of viewers
and then having to, you know, my dad calling me. Yeah. So are you on TV? So let me ask you something. I've got to explain to him the stupidity that came out of my mouth. If I said something like that. Oh, yeah. Okay. I see where you go. Yeah. We,
you look confused. Yeah. We, we've talked about that before that we could never get away
on the air. Forget about our listeners. We could never get away with the stuff that they do with our families. And we've always asked that question. Do, are, are all these, do you have entire families that have no critical thinking skills at all and never have to communicate effectively? Right. What's so ever on anything? Right. I mean, because what do you, did, does everybody just repeat at home? Just repeat not not their head or they're just also
ignorant or they, they too believe that the rank and file need to be willfully ignorant. And they know it's, that's just part of dad's job, you know, sounding stupid or sounding stupid then. Right. By the way, Dan, I want to job like yours. So you get to sound stupid and you get paid for it. Now, I'm, can I have that job? You get to sound stupid and get paid for it. Man, that's the best job that a kid could possibly have. I could hear my grandkids saying that about me. Hey, I want to
job like yours. You know, you get paid for sounding stupid. No, but, but, I mean, I don't know what
It's like for them, you know, at home.
COVID stuff. Right. There's news about there. Yuckin it up with, he was, remember, he was at that table.
This was early on. You know, you couldn't have two kids playing in a yard together without the SWAT team arriving if you were just a normal citizen. But here's the governor yucking it up with medical professionals at the table, no masks. They're all drinking wine, whatever. And, you know,
“and then I'm thinking to myself, well, later did he go, I think I'm guessing the California's”
first lady. I'm sorry. That's not what they call her. First partner is what news and calls her. She was sitting there, but they get home. Go, yeah, you know, as a, and can you believe this? People are so stupid. They're buying the whole mask thing. You know, and I think that comes from, I, you know, and the fact that people weren't more upset about that, I do think it comes back to, uh, we don't have it. We laugh at it. Yeah. Yeah. We fun with it. The, the obsession that people have
with royalty. Yeah. You and I talk. No, that's a great connection there. You and I've always talked
about it. You know, the whole thing that, you know, going way, and this isn't just this generation, this goes way back to the Kennedy's and Camelot. Yeah. You know, Fox News. I mean, if anything happens, you know, it's, they'll just go on, you know, full 24 hour live update coverage, you know, on all things royal though the royal family this and the royal wedding. And we're like, hey, we're the United States. We completely rejected that. We're a bunch of months who figured out
that monarchies are not the way to go and monarchies should not be celebrated. Exactly. Stop,
but there is a need for people to believe that there is a, a some kind of royal life. You'll see
the media talk about it. But who is the royalty in the United States? You know, we need to have
“more. No, we don't. We don't need to have, and I think people look at that and go, well,”
there has to be the people that get to, not obey the rules that are above us in some way, and maybe someday we could attain royalty shut up. You know, Newsom, you know, the excuse they gave Newsom. People like that. The excuse they gave him is he's embarrassingly handsome. How dare you cover a face that is so embarrassingly handsome. We're so doomed. We're so doomed. And we'll have more evidence coming to Rob's show. We will. That's pretty much what we do now.
We are Red Eye Radio. Brought to you by Hot Shot Secret. Hi, I'm Jen Lumis, a transport safety expert at JJ Keller. Compliance safety accountability is the FMCSA Safety Compliance and Enforcement Program. Its goal is to hold motor carriers and drivers accountable for highway safety. CSA does this by assessing the safety performance of motor carriers and drivers. Motor carriers are assigned to score. The carriers then grouped with other carriers who have
had a similar number of safety events. Carriers scores within the group are then ranked, low scores are better. So carriers with the highest scores are those that are most likely to be targeted for intervention by the FMCSA. Interventions range in severity and may include warning letters, roadside, off-site or on-site inspections, civil penalties or operation out-of-service orders. This tip was brought to you by JJ Keller and Associates. Visit us at JJ Keller.com.
We'll be right back with more Red Eye Radio with every currently and Gary McNamara. [Music] We are Red Eye Radio. He's our currently and I'm Gary McNamara. Yeah, just interesting when you have especially on the left. Look, Trump says things. We know that people object to last Friday was an example, but we know that people go into the White House
until Trump is wrong on stuff. They tell him at all the time. We know it. It makes the press constantly and I just wonder, you look at the left and the outright lies that they've told. I mean, just outright lies. And you just wonder, do their families ever come to them and say,
“stop it. And then, you sure when I remember we brought it up during the campaign last year and”
went, yeah, but look at, for example, Tim Walls. Look at his family. Look at his wife and when
They got involved in the campaign, I'm only bringing the family in because th...
campaign. And they're just a bunch of loose screws. Yeah. I mean, they're just, you're like,
wow, what's it like to sit down with that dinner table? Oh my gosh. And I know that you and I often talked about this. If we went on and just blatantly be as every night and just made stuff up, we'd hear it from our friends and family constantly. Oh, man. Don't embarrass the family like this. They're, where is that? Is there no, is there no? I come from this family. And there's a certain standard that I have to live up to. If you disagree with my opinion, this is why even
“from my late uncle Norm, who used to disagree with me a lot, I'll never forget when he told me.”
And he told me he said, look, I disagree to you. He goes, but I love listening to you because
I know exactly where you come from. I know why you believe what you believe. Right. And when you tell me and get into the minutiae of why you believe what you believe, I realize it comes from a base of really good morality. Now, think about the Democrats that have been around for, you know, any time, any amount of time. I mean, we go back to, well, Newsom on the city council been San Francisco, right? I mean, that's probably that's where you started getting loud and was like, okay, we're going to
have this guy around for a while. But think about how they've changed positions on so many things. Yeah. Which means that the narrative inside the home also has to change. That's a great point. The whole family is grappling. Yeah. On every major issue, they've changed. Yeah. And so that means that the family has to shift with you. Right. I don't get that at all. I don't know how that
“works. Man, that there's a reality series to be made. That's why I would watch a fly on the wall of”
the walls. Yes. Exactly. Crazy farm on TLC. It's, you know what I mean? It's, I mean, where we're, where we just grow a bunch of crazy. Kamala's place. That's right. That's got to the store and vice of Doritos. But it's, I mean, it's just, I, that has to, because I'm thinking this through. Right. If you're not, because if you have a change of heart, right, on something, whatever it is, you have a discussion with family. You know, everyone's wrong. A family member will,
maybe a family member has a change of heart or something. And you have that discussion. It's like your family member said, okay, you eventually learn why they think they think that way or whatever, even if you disagree. But the political game is different, of course, because those are the
“things you have to say, you know, along the way to fit the narrative. And those are, it's not like”
it's evolving slowly over a period of time always on everything. Sometimes there's a shift and it's
contradicting something they just said or did recently, which means inside the home, everybody's got to go along with it. And I do wonder, is there somebody, you know, the rebellious teenager? Is there anybody asking questions? But the, the mainstream media knows it. That's why they ever challenge them and say, why did you, why on these, on these topics, this, this, this, and this, have you changed 180 degrees over the past decade? Right. And just tell us why specifically,
what was it that made you change? Or did you always hold these opinions and were you lying to us? That's what I would love to. This is why it was really, one of the many reasons it was sad to lose a Tim Russell. You know, I mean, it's, you know, the loss of life. Number one, but beyond that, Tim Russell could sit at his desk. On me to press and say, you said this then and play the clip or get the quote from the, whatever interview, a newspaper article, whatever it is,
you're saying something totally different now. Why? And nobody in the media today has the ability to do that. Of course they do and they don't as you point out. Independent Americans daily news with army veteran Paul Rikha. Pressing issues of the day, the leaders who are shaping what America will be in the future. We're going to bring the righteous media five lives, independence, integrity, information, inspiration, and impact.
Join the movement.
Catch Red I radio live every night on the Red I radio app available in the App Store,
Red I radio. And he is here calling, I'm Gary McNamara coming up and just a minute and a half. How is TSA funded? All right. I spent the weekend with some old buddies of mine. Guys, I've known since grade school. In some cases, and we had a lot of fun reminiscing and I realized, you know, I've got a lot of energy these days. I woke up bright and early and I felt great, of course, no pain, no aches because of relief factor. And I realized how much of the aches and pains were
robbing me of energy before. I would feel like, well, I need to lay down and rest. I need to, you know, not move around if I've got aches and pains, but with relief factor, I don't experience that at all. Really factor is a 100% drug free research based formula that was created to help the
“bodies natural inflammatory response function for key ingredients going to work for you every day.”
And I want you to get the same benefits that I get from taking relief factor every day. Try relief factors three week quick start just 1995 visit relief factor dot com or call 8004 relief relief factor dot com 800 the number four relief use red eye at the drop down for your three week quick start at 1995. You know, we we're we're we're talking about just how the Democratic party and so many things have just reversed completely 100. And it agrees from what they believe
just a few years ago. And it's like the media's really never questioned them on it. And we always
wonder don't their families and you made a great point that when they change their opinion completely. Like if I became if I changed all of my beliefs. My family hasn't. Right. They'd be all over. Right. Well, how did, you know, and it wouldn't be angry. It would be I heard you on there.
“Well, when did you start believing that you were I believe this? Yeah. Walked me through the process”
of how you did that. Right. That's just natural curiosity. And and the one thing that I wanted to bring up because you had said when when you said that, I went, yeah, that's a great point that when you change your opinion to such a great degree to the point of being of it not making any kind of sense. Like open borders makes no sense to anybody. Right. You know, not having voter ID doesn't make sense. Right. To be absolutely for voter ID as every single Democrat was just a few
years ago. Absolutely. We must know no one, not a citizen should not vote in this country. I mean, they were passionate about it. Yes. They were as passionate as anybody that any leftist person might think is as far right when because they absolutely want this racist voter ID. Right. They were absolutely passionate about it every single major liberal Democrat, including Obama. They changed completely nobody ever really questions it. And you may say, well, the same thing
with Trump, not true. Look at Iran right now. Look at even when the, you know, after
look at Gaza, look at the support for Israel. He's always had great support for Israel. Right.
But he was never an isolationist. Right. He actually had and there's been a great discussion. There's a great discussion going on right now about that part of maga and how small it, you know, how small was that part of maga when it has an influence the Republicans as to what they believe
“about Trump and Iran. There's a great discussion on it. You know, does Tucker Carlson speak?”
You know, does Tucker Carlson and Megan Kelly? Do they speak for the president? Do they ever speak for the president? You know, and so, you know, there's a great debate, you know, there, anything the press tariffs to say there hasn't been a debate within the Republican Party. You've had a head, your, your, your, your head buried in the sand. Yeah. Yeah. There's been a huge debate on tariffs. The major issues out there. If there's any type of reversal or any type of moderating or any type of
getting tougher, you'll hear Republicans and you'll hear Republicans in the media. Now, are there Republican influencers who will agree with the president? No matter what, of course, that it's going to exist in social media. Are there some hosts that absolutely will agree with the president? 100% all the time, a few of them, not the majority, not, and so I think if they think if what's
The mistake you make if you think you need to agree with the 100% of the time...
you credibility by doing that or clicks, you know, or clicks, that's only going to last for so long.
In order to earn your audience's respect, you're going to have to have your own convictions. You're going to have to have your own thoughts. And again, you know, it's, this is the problem that that the left is, we've seen for the left, but I don't know, again, in their personal lives, how they get away with it, they go from, I mean, Harry Reed back in the day, the late Harry Reed, senior, the at one point in for a while, senior senator from Nevada,
a board of state, we need walls, some kind of barricade on the board.
And then within a year or two, his party's screaming, if you want a wall on the border,
you're a racist. So how do you compartmentalize that and make that work inside the four walls of your home? And that's another point. They change 180 degrees. And then if you don't agree with them, they're changed about 180 degrees. Yeah. When you ask, could you please explain why you have changed all you get is your racist, your Hitler, your a fascist, your this. And why, and why the media doesn't cover it is because they recognize they've changed. They know they've changed. Right.
They just don't have an answer for it. Right. No, they don't. They can't answer the question.
Right. You know, it's like you and I were playing the one on your cut, we'll play it coming
up here from from from Jeffries who was, you know, was asked, wait a minute, TSAs sued me that
“if you want to fund TSA and you want to do this, you get an agreement from Republicans if you want to,”
you know, you're you're claiming that you want to fund everything except you're not happy with the, you know, with the ice, we'll then fund everything and then leave this one open for debate. Right. Why won't you do it? And then they go into, well, because of Trump and because of this, and then he said, and, and because we're concerned with affordability, and so we need to make sure the taxpayer money goes to affordability. And you and I looked at each other and go, that doesn't
make sense. Right. If you're been more taxpayer money is going to do the opposite of creating a affordability. Right. And we just went, it doesn't, it doesn't make sense. It's like, they, they don't even know they can't even workshop this stuff anymore. No, they can't sit in a room and say,
“all right, what are we going to do? How are we going to try to justify this in some way?”
What, you know, what are we, and they, they can't do it. No, they can't. And so that to me is just, you know, that and how they get away just because we do this every day. And if we, and we may be more sensitive to it because we look at each other and say, my God, if we changed to 180 degrees of the things that we believed, if we changed 90 degrees, 45 degrees, 37 point four degrees. Yeah. We'd be question all over. You guys have these laws. You guys have had beliefs
and you've been consistent on them for decades. Why the change? Right. Well, because I care. Yeah, right. Yeah, because because I care and you don't, because I care and you don't care would that fly with anyone in our family or our audience? Or, well, the fact that you're questioning what I believe means you're a bigot. Yeah. I mean, it's, you're again. It's so absurd. You're against white Catholic men for me. I'm talking about white Catholic men on the radio. Yeah. Exactly.
Make sure I cover all the identity politics there. Just imagine these things and an informal setting with friends and family. I don't care who you are. Because things are shifting all the time. The Democrats are shifting all the time. I don't know. Is there a family memo on the fridge or something? Hey, we're now against closing the borders. We're, you know, back in, whenever, when Trump started
“running in 2016, you know, well, no, no, okay. If you want to put a wall up, now you're racist.”
We know that's what it's different. A dear family. Just no. Here's the memo. I don't know how it works. And the point is, is that your father, my father, the fathers of people that I know, mothers of people that I know, is there individuals with conviction?
I may disagree with, you know, some people's parents or whatever, or those pe...
with their parents, but those are quite often long-held convictions. Or if they change, they change
for a reason and over a period of time. It's not this shifting game back and forth like what the liberals are doing right now. And we have to include the liberal activist media.
“If you're an activist, that's why I always, you know, make the point of, it's a dry, erase board”
activist. You know, what is it today? What are we, what are we doing today? You know, bring your dry erase board, so we can make sure that we have our protest sign for the day and it's correct. And those are things that, you know, when, when, when, when you're in your home, when you're talking to family members, you know, again, there might be a family member that's, that doesn't agree with the rest of the family, but you know why they think what they think.
And you know that they think that. And the back and forth and, and, and the lack of conviction, I would just think, you know, if I were growing up in a household like that, or if I had grown up in a household like that, I wouldn't know what to think, because I wouldn't know, because your father, my father, our parents, our moms, our dads, let's sit down and
we'd have conversations. They would, they would share their experience. That experience basically
helped you build their convictions and help to teach us about the world. How does it work with these liberals? How does that work? How does that work in a household? How does that work in a, in someone's life where it's constantly shifting where there is a complete
“lack of conviction? I, I can't tell you. I don't know. The only thing I can think of is you the,”
because I've seen it with the, you know, some of the Republican influencers and administration influencers where it doesn't matter what they're promoting, even if it's no longer free markets or whatever, it's about getting the win and keeping the message going that we're going to win with this idea. And he only thing that I can think of because I have seen that, you know, no, this, this is great because spending the taxpayer dollars is going to get us affordability. And, and I don't mean
Jeffrey saying that yesterday, I mean, maybe an influencer for the Republicans saying that, it's like, no, no, no, no, no. Right. Stop. Right. The government doing a big government program is not going to make things cheaper overall. Right. You can make things cheaper for some people,
“but it becomes more expensive for other people now or down the line. Yeah. If you take my money and”
put it in somebody else's hands, it's cheaper for them, but not for me. But the public is convinced of that, though, the public is convinced right now that corporations are the problem. Even though they'll say governments to problem, the same government that they say, they're the problem, that government will say, the corporation suck. They're your problem. Billioners, this, this, this, this, this, this, this. Exactly. When actually the monopoly of government that cannot be overwritten
by anyone, if the government doesn't want them to, yeah, is viewed as really not the problem
as the free market. And if you want prices lower, the free market will always get you prices lower,
way better than federal government intrusion and the GOP vote and the Senate on the, on the housing thing last week, you know, with the Elizabeth Warren bill. Yeah. So many GOPers on board with that tells you exactly. And what, what we're saying, it, it demonstrates that very clearly and you're going to limit housing. Yeah. You're going to limit housing was going to make things more expensive. Right. Yeah. But the government's going to subsidize it. But it makes it more expensive. Yes.
So we're going to build more government housing. We're working against that during the Obama years. I thought so. Well, and during the Bush years. Yes. We know what happened in 2008, 2009. That was all because of government's government intervention. Government manipulation of the mortgage market. Yeah. Not of it would happen if it wasn't for that. Because we just go, we don't care. We just like the fact that we can transfer money, maybe I make it some of it. Right. But then you
really, I want mine. You really don't care about affordability. You just want somebody else to pay your freight. You want your share. We are right, I radio. You're in touch with what I radio told free at 8.6. Maybe Red Eye. We are Red Eye Radio. He's our currently, and I'm hearing
McNamara.
that Republicans should be pounding on constantly, Brendan Key from Atlanta News first. TSA is
largely funded by attacks on every ticket. It adds $5.60 to every one-way ticket and $11.20 to round trips. Every one in line right now is already paying the TSA fee even for free reward
“travel. If you've ever booked a flight with miles, round trip, and they say $11.20. You need to pay”
with the miles that's what it goes for. The government has previously diverted that money to the treasury pay the agents. They should pound on that. Yep, that's a good one. How could he our news is brought to you by how products. This is Red Eye Radio on Westwood One.
Now it's Red Eye Radio. Gary McNamara and Eric Hurley talk about everything from politics
to social issues and news of the day. Whether you're up late or you're just starting your day, welcome to the show from the Relief Factor Studios. This is Red Eye Radio. All across America, we're Red Eye Radio. He is our currently non-Gerry McNamara. Our audio cut our last week. Our audio cut of the week was Governor Kathy Hockel of New York.
“Banging rich people from New York who left to go to Florida to come back. And it was”
interesting because we didn't even bring it up last week. We were just so focused because the audio cut itself was so idiotic. But over the weekend, you started getting the contrast from 2020, due to 2026. Yeah, and people put it together on social media. Here it is. This is 2022 and then 2026. All right, here we go. And we're here to say that the era of Trump and Zeldon and Mohn Arrow just jump on a bus and head down to Florida where you belong. Okay. Get out of town. Get out of town.
Because you don't represent our values. You are not New Yorkers. But maybe the first step
should be go down to Palm Beach and see who you can bring back home. Because our tax base has been eroded. So I feel softly, you don't have a problem. It is like I have to look at the fact that we are in competition with other states who have less of a tax burden on their corporations and their individuals. And I would say remote work changed everything. There are people who could only work in an office in Manhattan and work in New York State. And they were captives to where a state
they were going to stay. We saw that that's not the case. I mean, you know, Wall Street. I just like where she said they're captives. Yeah, in, you know, of our state. Yeah, but it's just hilarious. She wanted everybody gone. Yeah, bag. You don't agree with us. You have our values. Get out. You don't want to tax people. Get out. Well, they got out. Now inside the hopeful household. Well, we're the discussions. Hey, wait a minute. Hey, mom or grandma or whatever.
Didn't, didn't you just tell them to get out? Now you're telling them to come back. Yeah, that's again, one more example. Just one more example. Yep. It's, look, Cuomo, when he was got out Andrew Cuomo, when he was governor, had to do the same thing. You know, hey, come back. Come back. I'll even cook you dinner. I mean, it was, and, and, and this is what they do. They go into campaign mode, you know, this,
ah, ah, ah, ah, Trump's buddies. Well, I get out. We don't like you. Hey, listen, we're short on some tax dollars. You guys want to come back? Just great. Yeah. Uh, very quickly, we had that we had to, uh, uh, read that, uh, one, uh, exposed, uh, from a report of it said, look, every time you fly your pain for TSA. Yeah. Five out with us, five dollars and whatever, right, 11 dollars and 20 cents for round trip. And if you've ever got a trip on miles,
“you have to pay that fee. Yeah, that's smart. I was wondering what that fee was. I never looked”
into it. Mm-hmm. Okay. I figured it was the processing fee. Nope. That's for TSA. Yeah. Republicans should be on Capitol Hill every single day this week. They should be pounding it. They should be everywhere. And the message is very, very simple. It doesn't need to be complicated. You say, everybody at the airport, you've paid for this already. You're paying for TSA.
Fun TSA now.
on ice, but we know you've heard and that play the audio cut. If you got the audio cut,
“we've got the technology to do it. Yep. The number of Democrats that have said,”
no, we don't want to reformize. We want it gone. Simply say that this is a Democrat party. Number one, you pay for TSA every time you fly. Yep. Fund it now. But the Democrats want open borders. That's their goal. We know it from the Biden administration. They want open borders. Yeah. Yeah. And then secondly, they want open borders. And they want open borders because you see it with the Save Act. They want fraud in elections. Mm-hmm. End of story. And you repeat that message.
Every thing don't get into the arguments. Don't get into the fights. Pound it over and over and over and over again.
You know, it's um, we should be getting paid from the GOP. But the problem is,
I guess they don't always do anything if they're not following our advice because for years we've
“been talking about how you just point. And that's what we mean by when we say just point to the other”
side when you point out what they're about. You win. Right. Because the the they've already shown us what they want to do. I don't want to get in any argument with any Democrat about, well, this is what we're trying to do. BS. Yeah. No, you're not. We know what you're trying to do. You want to open the borders again. You want to do what happened during the Biden administration,
because you didn't complain about it. You were okay with it. Yeah. And it wasn't that Biden couldn't
control the border. It was the plan of the Democrats to open the border. It's easy. This is what they should say. It's easy for the American public to connect the dots. You open the border. Trump closed the border. The people of the United States wanted a border control and every poll shows they want illegal immigrants out of the country. Every single poll now you're trying, if you're going to get into discussion now, we had a couple of incidents where people were killed who are
obstructing a police, a law enforcement operation. They were obstructing it. They were breaking the law. We hate the loss of life. But that does not make us a ran. Understand how radical the Democrats are, we can go point by point by point on it. And we can connect everything right now that they're debating to show they don't give a damn about the United States of America, and they don't give a damn about your safety. Right. I don't care what they're saying now. Well, we'd like this riddle. No, you want
“open borders. That's why you have a significant portion of your party's saying get rid of ice.”
They want open borders. How do we know? That's what they were doing during the Biden administration. We all saw it. We all lived it. Yeah. We know it. Anything they say now is a lie. We know what they did when they were in power. If you want secure borders, you're a bigot. If you want voter ID, you're a bigot. Yeah. That's their response. And by the way, that's when you know they've lost. That's when you know they have nothing when they go straight to the your racist and be blunt on it.
And when you do these panel discussions, I don't care what you say you want to do. I don't believe any of it. Because we saw what you did during the Biden administration. Yeah. You open the borders. Yep. For God's sake, stirring COVID. In fact, you actually had an express line. Yeah. TSA isn't that quick. Oh, yeah. No, we could have come from Venezuela. You sooner than go through an airport. You had the express line. We'll fly you into America. Yes. Here's the
app. Well, fly you right in. Yes. Let's not forget what they did. I don't care what Democrats are saying. None of it. None of it is the truth. Why we know what they did when they had power. There's no way to argue with that. Right. There is no way to argue with that. Right. Look, they were. And we want to prevent this from happening again. That's our goal is to protect the
American people.
is secure. Yeah, because you put them on planes. There is that they don't have an argument
“except claiming what they want to do in the future and what they might what they might be going”
after. And it's all a lie. We know it's a lie because we know what they did. I have to go with the facts that we know happened in our immigration, our illegal immigration history. Our immigration because that was you could put that under immigration because they said, hey, come on. Get on the plane. We're flying you in legal. So call it illegal slash illegal immigration. However you want to do it, they were attempting to get people into the country because they want fraud in the elections. And
we see it right now. We can tie the whole damn thing together in a nice little bone. We can do it within a minute. Yep. And their leadership should come on and say anything that they have to say now means deadly and squat. Yep. Because we know what they did when they were in power. Don't argue their talking points. They're talking points for what they want now are meaningless because we know what they did in the past. And we know the fact that since they don't
want voter ID, we know the fact they want fraud. They're arguing what degree of fraud there may be. Oh, we're saying we don't want fraud. They're saying, well, there isn't as much fraud as you think. So let's not prevent the fraud that may be happening right now. That's their argument. It's, it really is. And you know, we talked, we had the conversation this morning about what goes on in the household of these liberal activists and liberals in power. What are the discussions
“when they get home? They have to be bad soup crazy. And why is it so hard?”
When you look at something as simple as voter ID, there are not a lot of moving parts to voter ID. Not a lot of moving parts at all. Very simple equation. Very simple question. It's a yes or no. Should we require people to prove who they are when they vote? That's enough down. Yes, no answer. And yet we're still here and it's still according to these the radicals. It's still a viable argument. Yeah. I mean, remember when
Senator Warnock and Georgia, I don't even know any Democrats who are against voter ID,
huh? I've never even heard of that. People being against voter ID. And then we're back
full circle. Here we are. voter ID is wrong. Everybody in this party.
“Yeah. And you don't win it. There's no way to win it. And that's a great point because remember”
the reversal in that. Yeah. Remember when it was in selling. Right. Right. Because it was showing that turnout was fine in the wake of those states that implemented voter ID. And Warnock, when he, when he got into the Senate, I don't even know any Democrats who are against voter ID. They did a 180 on it and now they're back full circle. We've gone 360 on it. There it is. It was in 2021. And it's funny because Senator Warnock criticized the proposed
say back calling it a voter suppression bill. Yeah. Back in June of 17th of 2021,
Warnock falsely claims he never opposed voter ID laws. It's spoken out against voter ID laws for
years. Yeah. I've never been opposed. Here's the quote. I've never been opposed to voter ID. He said in an NBC news interview. In fact, I don't know anybody who is who believes people shouldn't have to prove who they are or who they say they are. But what has happened over the years is people have played with common sense identification and put into place restrictive measures. Blah, blah, blah, blah,
Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
He couldn't even fight back in 2021. He couldn't. He didn't even know anybody who was against
voter. As they said, he's condemn voter ID requirements for years. Yes. Again, this is where
“the Democrats absolutely believe that the people that vote for them are idiots, right?”
That they're completely ignorant. They don't know what's going on. They don't care to know it's going on so they can say anything, anything, anytime. And if they, if they, if they, if the rank and file of the average person even catches them in their hypocrisy or lying or whatever it is, they just forgive them. They don't care. They move on. And by the way, that's exactly what happens.
Where's where's the outrage? Where's the complete rejection of this kind of morotic behavior
on the left? You're not seeing it? I don't know. We are right, I radio. This morning's USDA Farm Report is brought to you by House products tested, trusted, guaranteed since 1920. The Cored Husker State, in the middle of several wildfires this month, ag producers impacted by wildfire in Nebraska or across the country, have recovery assisted available from USDA. According to Undersecretary for Farm Productions at Conservation Richard Fordise,
the standing disaster programs, these are programs that either exist because of congressional
“action through a farm bill or maybe a separate piece of legislation, they exist. And I think that's”
important because they're ready to assist right now. He advises affected producers to have
documents to present to local USDA service sectors when applying for wildfire recovery assistance. Retain the receipts or the invoices when you're purchasing, sensing material and then also photographs. Or information about USDA wildfire assistance programs are available at local offices or online at farmers.gov/wildfire. I'm Rod Bane reporting for the U.S. Department of Agriculture in Washington, D.C.
This report brought to you by Cenex fuels and looms. , we're Rod Bane. He's our crony and I'm Gary McNamara. All right, here's Tom Holman on CNN yesterday about ice at the airports. Hopefully we'll have all those answers here by the staff to know them. But we're working on it when we deploy them, we'll have a well thought out plan to execute. With respect, if you're doing this in 24 hours,
how well thought out could it possibly be? Again, ice has been an airport across the country for a long time. It's just expanding those things. Like it does it, how much of a plan doesn't mean to garden exit to make sure no one comes through that exit? We're talking about security options and these officers are well trained in security and the well-trained in a identification and like we're going to do it, we can help TSA move those people to the line. How is
it hard? How can it be well thought out in just 24 hours? Well, let me embarrass you by saying, "Don't be there!" You're going to check ideas and help out any way they can. They already have a presence.
“It's, and that's what it comes down to with these liberal activists in the media.”
It really is embarrassing. It has to be embarrassing to have your butt handed to you, especially with someone like Tom Homan who has a very consistent approach on everything. And that was just the truth. Very simple. They're already there. They're going to expand the liberal. They're well trained on ID. They're well trained on security, clearly. Not that hard. A little bit of shifting within the department that they belong to along with TSA.
So, I mean, you look at the people at TSA that are there and you look at the people that actually, you know, monitor the scanning. Well, they may not be replacing them. Right. But when you look at it, I've gone through TSA a lot. You've got the people that check you in with the ID. Then you got a lot of TSA people that just help you with your bin and tell you what to do to put it through before it goes in the machine. Right. Well, I would venture to say,
I could be wrong, but I would venture to say that for those agents, ICE agent...
already assigned to airports, they are very well versed because part of their job is understanding
“fully the vetting process that TSA does. Right. Right. So, they're familiar with it. So,”
the training really isn't that hard. But you don't have to do that. No. It's not that hard. It's just a challenge. It's just a challenge. And if you then work, you can do it. That's right. Save. It's a challenge. You're the stingtoo, Red Eyriga. From the Relief Factory,
your studio. We are running a radio. He is here, Krony, and I'm Gary McNamara.
Welcome in good morning. Well, the media was all over it. I don't think it's going to go too far
“because Trump is already known for statements that he makes. When people die or people that he”
views that have been against him, he's been extremely blunt at times vulgar at times people view of what he says is insensitive. And this is after the death of Robert Mueller, the former federal prosecutor who became the independent prosecutor that went after Trump as we all know for the Russia collusion hoax. Save what you want about what people say. You know, we've already said the biggest problem that Trump has had in our opinion in both terms is the words that he uses and how
he uses them. A lot of Republicans have been quiet on this and the reason they're quiet on it is because they know it's not going to get anywhere for them to defend the president on his words that the public opinion is already set on that and they don't want to give Democrats more ammunition. One, I had one Republican, one Republican loyalist, you know, tell me over the weekend. It's like, look, I know what Mueller did, but it doesn't help the Republican party when Trump does this.
It doesn't help them move forward. It doesn't focus on what he could have focused on. If he said, well, you know, something, I'm not the one to ask about Robert Mueller said for his family. I don't like to see anybody die, but this guy, this guy attempted to set me up and didn't succeed in doing it. And then still tried to throw me under the bus, you know, by saying, well, we didn't find any evidence that he didn't in the wrong, but that doesn't exonerate him. Right. Mueller did that on purpose. Yes.
He did that in purpose because that's not the job to exonerate someone. It's to find evidence that someone was guilty and they found him guilty on nothing. But the thing that got to us and again, this is not about because Trump's opinion of Mueller is not based. And I don't know if I went through a Trump one through, I don't know. I might be worse. No, because Trump said that I thought, well, because you and I've asked the question over the years since the whole Russian hoax thing.
How do you keep it together and how do you stay measured? Well, this is him in part, because I would have lost my ever loving mind that somebody had accused me of that. And and conjured up that entire Russian hoax as a group, eventually kept it going all through, including the Mueller
investigation. Yep. And to the point that some people still believe it was true. And here's what we
“said about the Mueller investigation. And I remember we re-emphasized it the day before the Mueller report”
was coming out. And we said this that if you believe, if you truly believed, now we know that when the investigation started, they knew they knew it was innocent. Yeah. They knew we didn't do anything. They knew at that point. Mueller people talk about his cognitive abilities. I can't take that into
Consideration.
Because you remember that came up afterwards, because his performance was so bad. But was it was it
really his cognitive abilities, or did he know that he had no out on anything? For example, we have
“talked about the Russia collusion hoax, which the people don't remember was the Democrats accusing the”
president of colluding with the Russians to hack or change the outcome of the 2016 election. The entire thing was a set-up operation by the Hillary campaign to create false evidence against Trump in order for her to win the election. And when she didn't win the election, Democrats decided to use
the entire set-up. And the dossier that was created by that. And the narrative that was created
by the Hillary campaign and the DNC that was completely false. Just to set up Trump, it got all the way to the Mueller investigation. And they knew by that time that it was false. But as we said, there was one simple way. This is not complicated. There was one simple way that you would know whether the public, but we are already new. But we said there's a one way that the public who doesn't pay attention to all the minutiae of stuff would know whether this
was a set-up and whether the Mueller investigation was also a set-up that went all the way to the top with Robert Mueller. And it was simply this. If you were given the task to find out, if Trump colluded with the Russians, you've start from day one saying, this is my investigation, right? What do we look at? Where do we find? We don't have anything yet. You know, what do we have? Oh, where's the best evidence? Well, the best evidence has to be the
“dossier. Yep. Because the dossier is what got a secret warrant to spy on the Trump campaign.”
Yep. It's the one thing that changed between when the warrants, the first application for the
warrant wasn't granted. The dossier was added. Then the the warrant was granted. So you would go back to the dossier and the basis for the warrant itself. Right. And you would go back to the dossier because you would say, that's the best evidence. Being my god, if you would evidence, if I'm an investigator, my god, if you have evidence that, you know, that made the secret court change their mind and say, yes, you can get a phyzoorn to secret war and on the Trump campaign.
My god, we're investigators. We got to find out what that evidence is. Right. We said, if they don't say that they went down that path, you know, at that point, it was all a sham that the Mueller investigation was all a sham because if they went down that path, what they would have found out, the investigators would have found out is what we all found out anyway. It was the Hillary campaign. It was Hillary Clinton using campaign money illegally, funneling it through a
Perkins, who we the law firm to fusion GPS in order to get dirt that was a lie on Trump, packaging and a dossier to make it look legit, passing around in circles, get a buzz on it
“to the point where John McCain bought into it. Yeah, remember? Yeah. Oh, yeah, he”
will forget. John McCain bought into it. All of it was a complete and total lie made up by people paid by the Hillary campaign, including Russian National, Iggy Dan Chanko was part of putting access made together. The only Russia collusion in that campaign was the Hillary campaign dealing with Iggy Dan Chanko, who in a drug fest made up all the salacious stories, did I say drug drunk fest apparently made up, you know, the all the salacious stories
on Donald Trump that weren't true. Remember the P tape and all that stuff, the prostit. All made up, all made up. Well, the Hillary campaign to set up Trump, by the way, that's another thing
We talk about.
on that at all. She won't do an interview with anybody else, only where she knows it's safe, which means she probably walks in and says, look, we can only talk about this. If you talk about anything
else, the interview stops. And I'm never going back in the whole. Right. Yeah. But here's how we know
this, let's go back to Mueller testifying. Here's how we know. And again, that Mueller was a part of trying to set up Trump and could not do it. Here's how we know. He was asked about Fusion GPS.
“Yeah. The name of that firm was Fusion GPS. Is that correct?”
And you're on page 103 103 that's correct, volume two. When you talk about the firm that produced the steel reporting, the name of the firm that produced that was Fusion GPS. Is that correct? Yeah. I'm not familiar with that. Well, excuse me, it was. It's not a trick question. It was Fusion GPS. Yeah. As somebody run on next, that's like Earl Warren not knowing who Lee Harvey Oswald was. Well, no, it was one of the reporters. One of the key pillars that we and we've talked about it.
You know, to the point that Fusion GPS employed one, Nelly Orr. Her husband, Bruce Orr, was a high-level agent at the FBI at that time. Thought he was base player for the cars. And that's Benjamin Orr. Oh, yes, sir. Yes, the late Benjamin Orr. And he was one of those who said, yeah, I don't know, you know, we're, and I don't know of what happened. I don't have no idea if his wife, Nelly Orr said, and some of this doesn't look right. But he did at one point, say,
needs to be a little more, you know, in terms of the dossier, we need to do a little more work on this.
“And that's why when we started to or when we learned later that they had started to learn”
at the FBI, the whole thing was bogus or others started to learn at the FBI. The whole thing was bogus, because it was. But we talked about and you just demonstrated before you play that audio cut, the big players here at Hillary and the DNC, Perkins Kooey, the law firm. Here's in GPS, the research firm. And Iggy Dan Chanko, the, the former British Intel guy
that was all part of his first deal, Christopher Seal was all part of bringing that together
and making that happen. These are key players that if you're, and we didn't do, we weren't paid millions of taxpayer dollars to do the investigation. You and I just followed it along because we took great interest in it. And for Robert Mueller, and what you just heard there, when he's testifying as, as a matter of issuing this report and testifying on that report, didn't know Fusion GPS. And, and so they couldn't find anything and it's why they said,
well, we couldn't find anything, but he's not exonerated and there might have been obstruction of justice, but we're not going to make a decision. That's not their role to do that at all. You find out, did he do it or did he not do it? Do you have the evidence or not? And so they throughout all these things Mueller threw it out because he still wanted that suspicion on Trump when everything was completely and totally bogus. Think about this if you're Trump. And the
“opposition does this to you. You know this now. Remember, remember the number of Democrats. He's a”
traitor. He's a traitor. They tried not only to destroy his presidency, but they attempted this
was the first effort to destroy his life completely. And then afterwards, you had other Democrats
with the impeachment, the charges, the 34 felonies, saw Chris Cuomo the other day, say, all of it was bogus. All of it. We know all of it was bogus. All of it. They went after him to try to destroy his life completely. And Robert Mueller was a part of that. He's, you can say, he served the country. That's fine. None of this is about that. This is about what he did to make Trump have the animosity that Trump has towards him. A saying president at the time.
And Trump looks at Mueller and says, this guy knew the truth. He knew I was innocent. And he was part of the effort to destroy my presidency and destroy my life. Because remember the accusation
Would have been, it's treason.
Think about this. Think about if somebody was running for president, working with the Russians,
“and then they win and become president, that would be a terrific, an unbelievable threat to the”
American people. If somebody is an ally of the Russians secretly, that would be a tremendous threat.
It would certainly be worth finding and removing somebody from office for and they found two
things, deadly and squat. Well, they, we did find out he didn't do anything. The only party,
“the only candidate that actually, you know, dealt with any Russia. Yeah. Was Hillary Clinton.”
Hillary Clinton. There's her colluding with Russia. And she attempted to set up this president.
Yep, with completely false and from a and creating the false evidence in an attempt to convict him, we are Red Eye Radio. We'll be right back with more Red Eye Radio with every
“currently, and Gary McNamara. We're when I read you. He's our chrony and I'm Gary McNamara. Just looking”
to some of the pictures from that air Canada flight that hit the fire truck on a runway in New York. Yeah. Yeah, LaGuardia. And it's wow. That I just saw the clip that the whole front of the plane is gone. It, yeah, a whole flight deck. Right. Yeah, it was a very serious crash. Hit it at 24 miles an hour with a report. This is Red Eye Radio on Westwood 1. The Dan Bontino Show. Damn, I missed you all.
I've got so much content bottled up my head. I got a lot of stuff. This is the kind of stuff. It's real. May not hear this anywhere else. Hard truths. There's a lot of stuff to talk about. They think it's going to open a lot of eyes and a lot of ignorators are going to get shut down. And a bold perspective, no one else can offer. They are freaking out. It's the comeback. Everyone's been waiting for. Lovers, haters, friends, supporters to track is you're all welcome.
I want to hear it all. The Dan Bontino Show. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.
