06-23-26 Part Two - The COVID Cover-Up

Wow, there's the third star in the third star.

A few years after the high school. I don't know if that's what I wanted.

“Stream up at the 13th April, parallel to the U.S. star,”

which is a new episode. The problem is... And you have a part with the title. There's no way back. Before I came out of the episode,

how House of the Dragon and Wicked. And now, it's Red Eye Radio, Gary McNamara, and Eric Hurley, talk about everything from father-ticks to social issues. And news of the day. Whether you're up late or you're just starting your day.

Welcome to the show, from the Relief Factor Studios. This is Red Eye Radio. All across America. We're Red Eye Radio. He is Eric Hurley and I'm Gary McNamara.

Welcome in good morning. Hello. Oh, by the way, was this addressed in the MOU? But I saw David Hurley post to this yesterday.

“You speak with one of the Denver papers,”

and then I forgot where he ended up. I don't know where he is these days.

But always brings up interesting points.

He said, "By the way, the Iranian regime owes American victims of Iranian terrorism over $50 billion in damages. There are over 90 judgments against Iran. Surely our Vice President brought that up

in the face-to-face piece negotiations." Is that the Washington Examiner? Is it the Examiner now? Yeah. All right.

Moving on. I just saw the one I chuckled. This is actually from last week. Yeah. But we were out in a boot. But this was the whole Tulsi Gabbard thing.

Oh, yeah. After, because now this is sitting because now Fauci will not testify before the Senate ran Paul. I saw Rand Paul inputting the subpoena out yesterday. After months of searching through intelligence,

community holdings and files, director of national intelligence. This is when she was. Tulsi Gabbard is revealing new evidence of longstanding United States government funding

of more than 120 bail labs in over 30 countries. These bail labs include labs in Ukraine, which may be at risk of compromised or to the ongoing Russia Ukraine war. For example, the intelligence community previously warned

that the US-funded bail lab in Ukraine likely housed dangerous pathogens and remain vulnerable to longstanding threats of Russian attack, seizure, or damage. The newly declassified evidence can be found here

until now evidence regarding the full existence and funding of these laboratories have been knowingly withheld from the American people, the information surrounding the existence. History locations and funding of these US-funded

bail labs has been intentionally covered up

by powerful people falsely claiming that they do not exist

in accusing anyone who says otherwise of being foreign assets and traders to America. Many of these US government-funded bail labs are currently or previously engaged in research using hazardous and highly contagious pathogens in some cases

to include dangerous gain of function research. Now we know what this is going with very little visibility or oversight. President Trump understands a serious threat. Dangerous gain of function research poses

to the American people.

“That's why he took decisive action on May 25,”

2025 signing an executive order to end federal funding of gain of function research around the world. I thought Congress already did that a few years back. Despite the obvious potential

for catastrophic global impact research on dangerous pathogens and bail labs can have politicians so-called health professionals like Dr. Fauci, and entities within the Biden administration's

national security team, lied to the American people about the existence of US-funded and supported bail labs and threatened those who attempted to expose the truth. The ODNI will continue to work closely with partners

across the government to identify where these labs are with pathogens they contained and dangerous gain of function research that threaten the health and well-being of the American people and people around the world.

The NIH gathered issued new guidance to the intelligence community directing increased collection

The director was already providing new details

on clinical trials that are underway at these facilities, raising significant ethical financial and security concerns. Regarding the supposed public health initiatives and US national security.

So her claim is we got the evidence that these things have existed and she put Fauci in there because as we have said all along, we watched it all the time.

“We watched it, remember we watched the hearings.”

We talked about it on the air. Fauci lied. He just changed the definition of gain of function. Right. And we were screaming at Rand Paul, forget about the definition.

Right. Forget about what you call it. Right. Ask if the US is manipulating viruses

to make them more easily, you know,

transferable to human beings. Right. Forget about the title of it. Right. Talk about the behavior. And it was Rand Paul was driving us crazy because he wasn't getting he was talking about the label

and not getting to the actual behavior. Café in his best form. With Cuba, with every café on Knotftrook for a moment. With the new Cuba-Wan Capsule Machine from Chiba, I welcome you to a famous café from special places.

Full Monday, thank Innovative Press Blue Technology and 17-Sorten Café for every Match. Aléba Premium Café is already in 2020. And there is the Cuba-Capsule Machine

“in Diner Chiba, Fjale and of Chiba, D.E.”

A perfect free-links-tack. Sonne. Park. Click-nake. And so many Pauls.

Shoppapoteek is said,

Chuseology and Hallow Free-links.

Here, if you are all at the same time to come through the allergies. As a new country, you will get 10% of 35 Euro. With the code "910".

Do you have an e-receptive? Just go to Shoppapoteek.com/goodshine. Goodshine-beddinging on Shop-minus-apoteek.com/goodshine. But yeah, we were doing gain-of-function. We weren't supposed to be doing gain-of-function.

Nope. And found she lied about it. Yep. And we all knew he was lying. You know, the moment that he was done,

he became, of course, the liberal media hero. And, you know, that's when he started doing interviews and everything else, and it was like, "Well, wait a minute. Who am I supposed to believe here? This guy?"

Or the guy that was serving at the time. And that role. And, of course, you don't believe either one. Because he's a liar. And he was lying about it then.

And now we have proof. We knew it then. And the American people deserve to know the truth. Can you imagine having all this, I mean,

“imagine that COVID had been much more dangerous than it was?”

My gosh, the number of people that would wipe out, and it killed a great number of people around the world. We deserve to know if taxpayer dollars are going to labs that promote gain of function on things like this. Well, I think it was Mark Halpern, you know,

who was talking about it and said, "Is the scandal itself is huge?" The American government under Biden trying to hide, you know, where this virus came from. And, you know, really got into the popular culture

when John Stewart has on co-bear. Right. That's where it got into popular culture. Yep. And it was just like, you know, the American public wasn't buying it.

And we asked the question, "This is the biggest medical story, the biggest medical, you know, shut down of a world society, probably since the late, when 1917.

Yeah, Spanish flu. Right. Yeah. We shut down an entire country, shut down an entire world.

It changed. And everything about the way schools are run, the way we work, the way people want to work remotely, the way companies want people to work remotely,

or not, as to more and more of the case. And by the way, we do give that one piece of credit to Stephen Colbert for not completely editing out those comments by his friend John Stewart on his show. That's the only credit I give to him.

But imagine that, that's the irony in the pop culture world,

on this whole thing was a liberal comedian. Yeah.

Well, I always thought, and we, you know,

we talked about Scott Pellie a couple of weeks ago and said, I said, I would have fired him for a lack of curiosity as a journalist. Right. He never asked the right questions. Right.

And one of the things that you and I've learned, which is why in our careers, politicians didn't like talking to us, right, is because we'd ask them the questions that they didn't want us to ask,

even if they were on our side. You know, we'd say, well, wait a minute. I don't expect you to answer that question. Right. I don't care.

And so, right now on the Iran deal, if President Trump appeared on our show, my first question would be, what? [laughter]

With him next information mark.

Exactly. A question mark. Yeah. But, you know, there was a complete lack of curiosity. I said, we're a curiosity from our people in power

to say, we've shut down our country, the public needs to know where this virus came from. You didn't see it from the Biden administration. No. You know, you knew it.

You initially saw it from Trump. Right. When he was saying, the China virus, remember? Yeah. And remember racist, racist, racist.

Exactly. It came from China. Right. Right. And then we've got that.

Remember, Nancy, doing the television interview in China? In China? Yeah, exactly.

“You know, and saying, and I believe that is in her district.”

And, you know, so she's standing there. You know, don't worry, don't do it. I don't care about this or that. I only care about the truth. Where did it come from?

And by the way, even after we really knew the truth, and everybody knew it on the lab leak, there was an article in one of the liberal publications. It was near times poster somewhere, near, not near Washington Post or somewhere.

That wrote, and the title of the article was, well, the consensus is in, we all know it was the wet market, something to that extent. And it was bad soup.

That's where we came up with that soup. Great. Because we can't say what we really want to say. Without getting fired. But we had the bad in there.

Yeah. Yeah. But I mean, that was where the John Stuart thing where he came in and just said, out of all the hundreds of thousands of towns across the world.

You know, what is, you know, it's like, what is the chance that the virus would appear at a fish market? Yeah. Just a stone so away. Right.

Where they actually do that real research. Right. Or they actually do the research on this stuff.

“And of course, that's what everybody figured.”

It was like, you can't say. Well, but again, at that point, the left was trying to sell us that a man can be a woman. So if you're trying to sell us that a man can be a woman, you can certainly try to sell us the coincident,

the quote coincidence that it came from a fish market within a stone's throw of the research center. The in Wuhan where it actually came. Right. And then it was called the Wuhan virus.

And a jumper called the China virus. That's racist. Well, it's a Wuhan virus. Right. Is that more racist when you say should the GPS?

You ever see that when you at any app? Do you want the GPS to be precise? Or do you want it to be in the general area? Right. Well, if it's precise, does that make it more racist?

Right. Exactly. It was so stupid. But we all knew that Fauci lied. He just was trying to change the definition.

Of course.

“And that's why we were screaming at Ram Paul saying,”

Don't talk about what the label is. Talk about the actual behavior. What was the conduct? What was the research about?

This is what's critical in all of this.

It's critical in everything. Is the truth. Because the goal would be my goal. Just me talking. To not have this happen again.

Because imagine that it was something. Because they, you know, for a while they were treating it like you breathe on somebody they died. Now it was dangerous. And it killed a number of people across the world. It was very dangerous.

Now imagine something even more dangerous. Leaking as a result of being available as a result of taxpayer dollars going into it.

When we talk about what could be used as a weapon by our enemy.

“I understand that that research is important.”

There has to be transparency at every level to every extent possible. And we got everything but in fact we got the opposite. We got nothing but lies and the left doing everything they could to control. They didn't buy the science. Gavin Newsom didn't buy the science.

There's proof that he did not buy the science. And the question was how did this begin? It's like the Russian hoax thing. If we don't go back to the beginning. If we don't go back to where this started and how this happened.

The foundation of all this.

Then we'll never be able to prevent this in the future.

We are right I radio. Brought to you by FPPF fuel power max. Most owner operators least to larger carriers are paid on a per mile basis. Or a percentage of revenue per low. The per mile basis is most prevalent among larger fleets.

Percentage at smaller pay per mile tends to dominate discussions about pay just because it's easier to measure. And pay per mile often is wrongly used as the deciding factor in leasing to a carrier. While pay per mile can be a vital factor. It's not a cure for every ill. Nor does it mean a big settlement check is coming in owner operators way.

Why?

Because pay per mile always must be considered in balance with gross revenue as well as total costs.

Gross revenue can include flat mileage pay. The varies by length of haul. Percentage revenue pay and more. Most importantly though for every revenue dollar generated. Only part of that dollar is profit.

But for every extra dollar of cost saved. The entire dollar contributes to profit. Knowing and understanding your cost to operate is fundamental to understanding the true value of any pay package. Owner operator business 101 is provided by overdrive partners in business program. Go to overdriveonline.com.

To the partners in business section of the website for more details on this and many other topics. Throught to you by Shell Rotella. With advanced synthetic technology is designed to help keep your rig running with more mileage and less maintenance. We'll be right back with more Red Eye Radio with every currently and dairy McNamara. Good morning.

The entire thing with Fauci does have similarities to me with Russia collusion.

“Because when we were talking about, you're like, how is he going to get there?”

I'll tell you.

When we, you and I were always asking the question, why is a Biden administration?

Why are they protecting China? Right. What is it that, and we realize that eventually they weren't protecting China? They were protecting Fauci and others that were doing things that were illegal. Yes. We weren't supposed to be doing gain of function.

Right. And they were doing it. That's who they were protecting. And I related to Russia collusion. It's the same thing you and I said before the Mueller report, the day before the Mueller report came out.

If the Mueller report does not say, well, what we did when we started day one was we've looked for evidence that Trump was colluding with the Russians. So we said, let's start with a clean slate, where would you go first? Will you go straight to the Pfizer warned? Because the Pfizer warned on Carter paid, must have had the evidence. If you got a secret warned on a person in the Trump campaign, that's where the evidence had to be.

That's got to be the big evidence to convince a secret court to actually put, you know, do a Pfizer warned on a member of the Trump campaign of a presidential campaign. And we said, if he doesn't do that, if he says we didn't go down there, or they just don't mention that they went down there, then we knew it was all bogus. Right. Because you're always looking for the best evidence the best evidence would be in a Pfizer warned.

“Right. Yep. That's what I'm saying earlier. It's just like Russian collusion.”

If you don't go back to the foundation of why it all happened, then you, you're bound to repeat it. But they couldn't do that because it would have exposed Hillary because it was the creator of Russian collusion. And if you kept going, we believe there could have been a connection going back to Mueller. No, yeah, when he was with the FBI, yeah, we always talked about that. Would it go as far back as Mueller? Right. Because if you go back that far, then you've got to go back a little bit further.

But why do we believe this then? And then you could go all the way back.

Yeah, there was that too. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, no, no.

“It was, well, that's the problem because we asked, is this only part of a bigger picture of them?”

Because remember the courts in October of 2016, the outgoing, basically almost the end of the Obama administration,

saying telling the Pfizer courts, sorry, we didn't follow you orders to quit violating people's rights. And it went back to Mueller. And it went back to Mueller. So we wanted to know if other things were happening, and there's the Mueller connection right there. You're listening to Red Eye Radio from the Relief Factor Studio.

We're Red Eye Radio. He's our program. I'm Gary McNamara download our Red Eye Radio amp today.

And you can listen when you choose.

“Thank you. Thank you. You know, I'm speaking about the cure starma resigning this Prime Minister. I think it'll go into effect. He's staying is he stepped on immediately as his parties leader.”

And he will, there's going to be a, you know, transition. He's going to stay till there's a transition to another Prime Minister. Doesn't great Britain remind you a little bit like California. Yeah. And I say this from the point that they keep, they keep electing basically the same kind of people to do the same kind of things. They're just satisfied with them, but they keep electing them. You know, it was sort of like when they had the, the governors, one of the governors debates in California.

And it came down to it. And I can't remember whether it was a Bianco or Hilton who just said, you've, you know, you look at the polls. I mean, roughly, you know, the Republicans have about, you know, if you look at the primary results about what 30%.

So Democrats support still is 70%. It could change in the election you never know.

You know, it could be, it could be closer. But I forgot what the Bianco or Hilton had said, these are the same people that are saying they're going to solve the problems. Yet they endorse and supported all the initiatives that created the problems that we have. No, and, and it just seems like it, and I say someone wrote it's like, you know, a great Britain is like California. They know what they don't like, which is the result of their policies, but they don't know what they like.

“Well, that's it. Well, because here's the thing.”

If you are to move more toward conservative principles, work has to be done, and it's hard. They use a word called austerity. Don't you dare, though, in 2026, talk about making cuts. Right. Years ago, a guy I knew was British, and he was, he didn't live here, but he came over here frequently for events. And we were at an event in California, and he said, we have a new petrol tax for us Americans. That's fuel tax. And he said, he said, that's kicking in like next week. Oh, that's horrible. He goes, no, no, it's great.

I said, why is it great? He said, because it's going to put more funds into NHS. And I stopped right there because I didn't want to fight anybody. And also, no, because it would have been, you know, an endless conversation. And because not keeps British didn't have a problem with NHS or just simply believed it needed more funding. I can't tell you because I didn't ask him. I just, I knew where he would go, and there's no point of me debating him as an American. I know, in fact, we've got a couple of Brits that have written us, and talk about the failures of, you know, what's going on over there.

And then that guy's not working in time to do it again. And then they just like go through prime ministers, you know, it's like like crazy.

“It's it's as if something is going to change. And I think it's a theory, I don't know if it's true, but I think a solid theory that they just simply in order to change in order for things to work.”

I really, by the way, thought Brexit was kind of a big deal because I thought, wait, they're looking at it going, hey, there are people that aren't held accountable. By us that are dictating to us what we have to do, and we don't like that. Right, they said, we don't want to be Virginia. Yeah, exactly. We want this packed compact between between other countries in their case. And, you know, and it sort of, actually, I mean, we joke about it. But it's sort of the same thing with the compact and Virginia, which takes away where you don't have representation for your what the people of Virginia actually want.

But I think it, because if you're going to talk about implementing conservative ideal, you're not, it's not going to be easy. If if you're going to promote that the government gets out of the way, I don't know that they know how to do that over there.

I just don't know, it just because of the nature of of how their government has always been.

Well, there's been there's been a shift in the polls and the anti immigration party reform UK is now beating the, the labor party, but. So, Starmers leaving, right, he'll be leaving. It's going to be replaced most likely by Andy Burnham who's a left wing who's a left wing politician.

“And so it's like, okay, what are you going to do different? What are you going to promote different? And, and the fact is it's like, you know, the party's trying to figure out, you know, what are we going to do?”

As they look at the the public opinion polls that the public is, you know, maybe moving the other way. Now, maybe maybe there will be movement like we've seen in some South American countries Columbia, for example, holding their election. And you saw what happened, you know, you know, down there. And so, you know, I was reading what what Burnham was saying. I'm like, okay, there's nothing specific here. They're not really going to change. And you look at it here. I mean, we look at the Democratic party here in the United States and how insane they've gone.

We, we, we let you know what's in their platform. When we say insane, we're not trying to be over the top and throw over the top rhetoric at it. It's the issues that they're talking about the Democratic socialist of America, which is has huge representation.

“It owns it is what owns the Democratic party. It drives the Democratic party to the left. Maybe they won't embrace everything.”

They're not going to get everything through. I mean, you're, you're not going to change. You're not going to, let's put it this way. You're not going to get rid of the Senate. No, no, no. That's not going to happen. And you're not going to have government ownership of major corporations in America. That's not going to happen. But that's where the new Democrat leadership in the United States wishes to lead the Democrat party. And that's part of the, you know, part of the discussion has been over the last couple of days with some of the South American elections.

And what's going on in in great Britain and other parts of Europe, where they're not looking at liberalism and saying this doesn't work.

They're rejecting it as the United States seems to be embracing it. And it's like, there's no critical thinking or I'm sorry, a lack of human intelligence.

You know, when you've got a place like Maine that may elect a Nazi who got a ton of votes in one in a landslide in the primary. Yeah. I mean, when you've got that going, it's like, it's like, holy Toledo. And so I just, I look at great Britain, I just went, they seem to remind me a little bit of California. Well, let's do the same thing, you know, it isn't working. Get a new person to do the same thing. So in doing my ancestry, I found out that one of my great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great grandfathers was Robert Harley.

The first Earl of Oxford, who wasn't officially the first prime minister, but many called him the first prime minister serving under Queen Anne.

I mean, we're talking about back, he was born in December of 1661 and died in May of 1724, right?

“So I think to myself, my gosh, first of all, that didn't even have Facebook.”

Second of all, you think about, again, how long that country has been the way that it is and the back and forth.

In fact, after he was in office, he was in prison for a short time because of his positions and seemed to be a traitor because of the positions that he held. You know, think about this, you know, if they just someone just said something out loud, you know, a lawmaker or a former lawmaker, and then they just went to prison because they said something out loud. And it wasn't slander or libel, they were just issuing an opinion and a position. Well, you know, California. California.

Yeah, just like that.

“Just like we're going by that transgender language law that they, and when it was in instructing the thing to me about doing ancestry is really isn't about the people in the family.”

I didn't know him. He didn't know me clearly.

It was hundreds of years ago. I, and I had no idea what kind of person he was like, it was just to me. It's the history of it all as you read through their lives. And then you're just reading through someone's life, whether they were related to you or not, really is irrelevant. That doesn't really mean anything at all. It just, but it, when I found that out, I thought, this is it. They're steeped in this culture and it won't ever change. It's, you know, they made a couple of moves, like Brexit. It said, hey, we want representation. But of course, it means something else to them over there for different reasons.

“Then you look at all the doctors in the NHS and their healthcare system that are saying, this is dangerous. This cannot continue. This is costing people their lives.”

It's not going to change. It isn't. You think of Margaret Thatcher at some point. You're going to run out of other people's money. Well, apparently that's not happening. They're still doing it. And so what do they do? They take more of other people's money. That guy that guy I know from Great Britain was happy they were raising taxes on fuel, because he thought it was going to be a better NHS system after those those taxes were raised. And of course, it hasn't changed. We are Red Eye Radio. Coming up more with Gary McNamara and Eric Harley, it's Red Eye Radio.

We are Red Eye Radio. He's our croning. I'm Gary McNamara. And this segment of the show called, this is not the Babylon being from the CBC. Yeah, a Canadian town grants rights to trees. A small town west of Montreal has decided to officially recognize trees as living beings with rights of their own

in what the Environmental Organization describes as the first in Canada.

The resolution adopted by the Terras Vodriol City Council on June 9 to Claire's. The trees are worthy of protection, including the right to life to natural growth to integrity and to regeneration. And the right to move about freely. There's a town sign, the town sign, a universal declaration of a right of the tree, which says the tree is a living being sensitive to changes in its environment. In fact, with the mayor said, you know, the trees just like a human being. I saw the documentary, Lord of the Rings. They walk, they do everything. They're they're almost human.

Well, the question now comes up. Firewood housing. Lumber. Lumber. Yeah. Fire safety. Right. Yeah. Yeah. You know, just you just think of, you think of, you think of, you think of just everything that we use and everything that we use would for it. Well, and but, but here's the thing, are they going to be held accountable.

I just, it's just, this is how delusional it is. What did they watch the Wizard of Oz and say, well, look at this tree throwing apples.

“Yeah, or the Lord of the Rings that, you know, where they come to life and go to work.”

Yeah, exactly.

Listen, I got about that one. Yeah. No, no. Oh, yeah. We got about that. It's even better. If they could come to life and go to war,

I might have a different attitude about they are human. Now, talking, who clearly smoked a lot of weed.

“I mean, he was, well, way over the time. His name said it. Tolkien. Yeah, exactly. I mean, book.”

I say, we get some hobbits together. Maybe some people are else because we need cookies.

And we, they live in trees though. I'm going to say you can't make them in the trees. Can't make the cookies in the trees. Well, if we do it. If we can't make cookies in trees, how are we going to do the flood stripes without trees? You know, it really does remind me of the, what was it?

“Remember that remember that people worshiping the trees earth first earth first, the earth first, the earth first, look at this rock.”

Look at the wonderful look at this rock and the wonderful life this rock has lived. Yeah, yep. All this happens when you leave the lies. It's it. The sea is red, I radio. On Westwood One. Very good, very good. Very good?

Very good. It's very good. It's a very good thing. Cool, we said that. Stift on the wall and test computer build, focus money, chip finance, look what's up. Mega, but that's the same thing completely. Eww. A few photos of the landscape of the landscape make it very good. It's very good. Hold your money with this story.