The Chris Plante Show
The Chris Plante Show

9-4-26 Hour 2 - Milo Not Happy to be Deported to the UK

2h ago41:126,038 words
0:000:00

For more coverage on the issues that matter to you, download the WMAL app, visit WMAL.com or tune in live on WMAL-FM 105.9 from 9:00am-12:00pm Monday-Friday  To join the conversation, check us o...

Transcript

EN

The choice in this election is not between this set of policies that are good...

this set of policies that are not so good, the choice in the election really is between crazy people who are trying to rig the game and common sense people, but you may have disagreements with them time to time, but at least they're rooted in common sense. Exactly right, at least they're rooted in common sense, remember common sense, remember normal,

oh I missed normal. It was nice, the 1980s were normal. Never mind that Ryan Reynolds

guy, what he says about the 1980s, he's wrong again. Good and happy Friday too and welcome back. We are at 888-630-9625. President Trump selling Lake America hats, red baseball caps with Lake America on them, 55 dollars, 55 dollar baseball caps, red baseball cap, they're like mega hats to make America great again hats, but they say Lake America and you can buy them

because you know Lake Lake America no longer Lake Ontario, what is Ontario anyway?

It's a speedway in California, what is that?

And we've got a three-day holiday weekend coming up. I hope it says beautiful where you are.

As it is here, it's a little warm here today, but I think it's cool enough. It's going to start cool enough. It's real nice here in America. We had a big storm rip through last night, but I had my brother drove in from Chicago yesterday and I'm going to, I'm going to confess, we drank beer, we drank beer last night. We stayed home and had some beer and then we went out and we went to a neighborhood restaurant that we walked to and sat out on the patio and we ate food

and we had more beer, we had more beer, then we came home and believe it or not, there was still

beer in the fridge and there was more beer, more beers, so I didn't do my homework as well as I

normally would last night, I wasn't doing my homework real great. So I have to cut me just just a little slap, but we're covering, don't cut me any slack at all, of course, it'll be silly. But we've got, we've got a lot to cover, we've got all kinds of madness and I want to share this.

There's a new Gallup poll, Gallup poll that came out. It's actually, I think it came out yesterday,

nine in 10 Americans, that's a lot, that's a big percentage. Nine in 10 Americans believe, there's widespread corruption within the U.S. government, a new Gallup poll, the George Gallup Organization, the Gallup Polling People found that nearly 90% of Americans now believe there is widespread corruption, that's the turn of phrase used, within the U.S. government, according to a recent poll, the data came from the Gallup poll and it was published on Wednesday.

For the survey, respondents were asked, it's a question now, is corruption widespread throughout the government in this country or not? That's the question, question mark, and quote, according to Gallup, 89% of participants responded to the question with, yes, yes, it says, there is

corruption widespread throughout the government in this country, 89%. Said yes, and if I were asked

that question, I would say yes, I would say, yeah, I'd say of course there is a widespread corruption, it's terribly an awfully widespread, and I know I can crack the code on this because I've been watching this stuff for a long time. So that number, Gallup noted this is Mediaite lefties writing about it and from a left-wing perspective, that number, Gallup noted, was the highest it's been in two decades, two decades. Additionally, the figure said at 73%, just two years earlier,

that 16% jump is the highest of any two years span, in the last 20 years, it's a big jump. Now, that sentiment was shared among three major voting blocks with 91% of Democrats, 90% of independence, and a staggering 83% of Republicans, I don't know why that's staggering, and the Democrat number is not, and the independent number is not. Oh, it's because lefties are typing, and you know how they are, I like that. But, and a staggering 83% of Republicans believing in

widespread corruption. Interestingly, Democrats saw 15% jump from the previous year, and President Trump was in office a year ago too. Republicans, on the other hand, had just a two point increase as 81% believed the government was corrupt in 2025. See, 81%. And this is Al-Abatchek, I can crack the code here now, with with 2026 as Highmark, President Donald Trump, had three

Of the highest years on record when it comes to Americans' perception of gove...

Last year, 79% of Americans believed in widespread corruption, believed in widespread corruption.

In 2018, Trump's first term. That number was at 78%, see, they're trying to tag Trump with this,

but the only year to match any of those was 2013. Hey, was that Barack Hussein Obama? When 79% of Americans believed the government was corrupt under former President President, Barack Hussein, Obama, and so that's interesting in and of itself. But, I can explain this. In terms of government mistrust to the U.S. significantly, outpaces other membered countries within the organization for economic cooperation and development, I like to call the OECD,

because I abbreviate everything. You know, the Gallup report added. Now, let me explain this.

Here's what's going on. U.S. A Republican is their widespread corruption in the federal government.

Ask him that when there's a Republican president, ask him that when there's a Democrat president, ask him that in between presidents, and we'll say yes. Yes. And Democrats, you see, this is where the flux comes in, because when they've got a really profoundly corrupt anti-American president, like Obamacare, and if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan, and it's going to be more affordable. It's going to be more

affordable. Everything is alive. Everything, guys, is alive. But Democrats, when there's a Democrat in the White House, say, oh, now the corruption is gone. Now there's no corruption in government.

So, are you going to see the fluctuation in the Democrat votes in this poll? And not the Republicans,

because Republicans are going to say, well, yeah, you're talking about the federal government, is there a corruption? It's the nature of the beast. It's the nature of big government to be corrupt, and a Republican president being in the White House doesn't mean that corruption magically disappears from the permanent bureaucracy that we've seen so abused and corrupted over the last handful of years targeting political enemies with the IRS, for example, which Barack Obama did.

Patriot groups and Tea Party groups targeted by the IRS to keep them on the sidelines and an election year. Barack Obama sent his election team over to Israel to try to get Benjamin Netanyahu defeated in the race there. They failed. They, you know, these guys, they spied on the reporters on the associated press. They spied on the New York Times. They spied on James Rosen at Fox News. They spied on James Rosen's parents who live in New York. The Obama people did.

They're honestly, they abuse the FBI. They abuse the CIA for political purposes.

Lying to us, that information operation that Hunter Biden left top had and the reporting of the New York Post had all the earmarks of Russian disinformation. When in reality, John Brennan is Russian disinformation, the corrupt criminal penitentiary face. John Brennan, CIA director, communist party voting, CIA director, under Barack Obama, literal communist party voter. And the corruption there, but every Democrat, I'll say, oh, there's no corruption. The editor of the New York Times would say,

there is no corruption. The president of CNN would say there is no corruption in the Obama administration and the Biden administration, for that matter, to adjust extraordinary. You, you people. So the reason and the media people and and Gallup, it's not really Gallup's fault. They're taking the polyester same questions. The numbers go up and down. But they, why do they think it's staggering that 83% of Republicans believe widespread corruption? That's because we're not stupid. And we don't

lie to ourselves. And we don't pretend that the vast bureaucracy becomes squared away because there's a Republican in the White House. You can put your cabinet secretaries in, but there are hundreds of thousands of employees that are part of the permanent bureaucracy. And they tend to be Democrats and liberals, not entirely, of course. But in the federal government, it's, you know, it's sort of a bastion for, for liberals. I work for the government. I make less money, but I'm

noble in self-righteous. And I, and I retire after 14 months, and I collect my full salary for the

rest of my life. I know, it's not, it's not that good. I'm making fun of it. But the fact is that we

see the government, not as being the president, all by himself. But as being the government, the the bureaucracies plural, and the permanent bureaucracy, the permanent employees, lifelong government employees, and who jump right in when the IRS is told to target Tea Party groups and Patriot

Groups on the lead-up to election day.

work. And the Democrats find every corrupt way to undermine that. And Republicans come in and try to

try to, look, Ronald Reagan came in and had the same mission to clean up the federal government.

And as the, you know, Ronald Reagan jokes, we're from the federal government, and we're here to help and all that good stuff. But I'll bet if you looked at the government numbers, you'd find that the Republican numbers throughout the decades had been quite consistent. And that the Democrat number is fluctuate with the wind. I'll, I'll just go ahead and let's see if Gallup will put out clarification on that. All right, I should go back to the telephones, Mike Levin, bit of the telephones

and quite a while. Let's go to, let's see, let's go to Mike calling from Gainesville, Virginia, Michael, you're on the Chris Plant Show. Mike, Chris, can you hear me all right? Mike, I can hear you loud and clear, buddy. All right, I'm on a bicycle right now. I'm on a hard time. Get my phone out. Hold on. You're doing all your sky diving. You say you're sky diving right now? I have just landed. Excellent. Very good. You see the news article last week saying Barack Obama

has returned $29 million. He got from royalties off the Affordable Care Act in his name, the Obama

Care Act. He got $29 million, Barack Obama did from Obama Care and now he's got to return it.

That's what I read last week on the internet. Well, if it's in the internet, it can't be on

true because they got fake checkers over there in the internet. Yeah, federal court orders Obama to repay $29.9 million in royalties associated with Obama Care. Wow, now I miss this all together. I'm really glad you called in, Mike, because I hate being dumb on things, but this is this even the PBS Panhandler Broadcasting System that we did this story and I missed it all together.

President Obama reelection efforts raised $29 million in jail. Oh, this is they've got a totally

different story. I apologize NPR PBS. They've just they say, hey, look, Barack Obama's getting rich, but the federal court ordered Barack Obama to repay nearly $30 million, $29.9 million in quote royalties associated with Obama Care. A federal court has ordered former president, Barack who's ain't Obama, to repay $29.9 million in improperly received royalties and licensing fees associated with the Affordable Care Act. It's a misnamed Affordable Care Act. Finding that

he personally profited from legislative naming rights policy merchandise licensing and also per and roll and roll Lee commission structure. So for everybody that enrolls in Obama Care, Obama gets a cash kickback and see that's corruption. Now that's corruption. See, it's nice that we got a president who was already rich when he got here in my right, Mike. Well, he's made

it off on money one way or another, but it's amazing that there's some sort of way that this was

got to be a circumnavigation of the amalgamant clause. Obviously, he's getting paid for something that's public property. I'm not sure how he's supposed to get some benefit, but at least the courts have have reversed course here on this liberal corruption and geomechanism. Well, listen to this, the court found that Obama himself received approximately $3 per and roll Lee. So somebody rolls in Obama Care, he gets $3. And you get a million people in roll. That's $3 million. That's a

Barack Obama. This is the stuff of like the Philippines. He's Bung Bung, Marcos. I think federal

exchange referral commissions between 2010 and 2017. He got $3 per and roll Lee licensing fees from hospital systems using the term Obamacare in marketing materials. Got to pay him and merchandise royalties from the sale of approximately $400,000. I hurt Obamacare tote bags, coffee mugs, and also commemorative pill organizers that should be suicide pills. I think the judge noted that the naming legislation after oneself and then profiting from the branding constitutes self-dealing

of the highest order, the court said. And I got to tell you, Mike, I'm really glad you brought this to my attention. They kept it under cover. I don't know how I, and that's not being widely

Reported.

Getting light on things that need to be seen. Yeah, yeah, shedding light. That's what we do now as we tell the truth. And yes, no matter who's present, we think government has crept. But I know that Barack Obama abused the FBI. He abused the CIA. He abused the IRS. And all for personal gain and political gain, corrupting these institutions to, uh,

abusing them into to profit and benefit personally, because that's what the left does, you know,

is he was mentored by a communist named Frank Marshall Davis. He brought in the communist then Jones to the White House. He made a communist voter John Brennan, the CIA director.

And then surprise, surprise, abuse the CIA in ways never imagined in the United States from

America, very third world stuff. Michael, thank you. Happy Friday, Jay. All right, we're back. And I, uh, I'm going to have to throw myself on the sword here. Mike, you called in and it started with the almost little joke. I saw it on the internet. It was on the internet last week. I went and retrieved it, uh, Mike and, and I didn't, I found it right away. And there are a number of stories about Obama and 29 million dollars. But last week,

this story hit the internet, uh, claiming that a federal court ordered Barack Obama to repay 29

point nine million dollars in royalties associated with Obamacare. Um, and, uh, let me, uh, say this

Mike, I, I just spent a couple of minutes looking into it. I think it's Bushwa. I think it is, uh,

not a real story. I think you said it's on the internet. And I joked, well, it's on the internet. It's got to be true. You know, they got fake checkers there on the internet. Um, this, Mike, I believe is a Bushwa story. I believe that this is not a real story. I believe it's a made up story. It's a fake story. It's an internet story. And I don't believe that a court ordered Barack Obama to repay 29.9 million dollars in royalties associated with Obamacare. I believe this

to be a fake story, uh, on the internet where a lot of fake stuff resides. Now, it was fun. You know,

you called in and say, hey, I saw this story last week. And I did a speed search on Al Gore's amazing

internet. Peace be upon him. And I found this story right away. But, um, and a number of stories

about Barack and 29 million dollars. Mostly it's fundraising from years ago. But, um, Mike, I believe

this story is untrue, not true. And fake check. Deep bunk. Yeah, we had a big storm rip through here last night. A lot of trees all over the city knocked down. And, um, mayhem. Mayhem, I tell you, our, our balcony was, uh, was a mess. It was a mess. The, the vrenda, I like to call it the vrenda sounds more European, you know, done. Um, all right. Well, we've got, uh, we've got a lot of, uh, a lot of crazy news. Um, you remember

Milo Yenoplas, Milo Yenoplas? He's, uh, a, uh, you know, a guy on the right, I guess, who, um, was, uh, kind of a prankster. He was, he was, uh, sort of a funny guy. I thought he was funny most of the time. And, uh, Milo Yenoplas turns out was a, uh, a gay guy, right? He's, uh, I think a gay guy, and a conservative, and he said wacky things, and, and he was kind of amusing and entertaining for a period of time. Well, he's, uh, very angry now, because he's been deported by the

Trump administration back to his native England. I didn't even know he was an English person, but he's been deported, uh, much to his surprise, apparently, back to, uh, England, the old country, you know, and I think, but we've even got a sound bite of him, don't we? But he's very angry because he's like, oh, well, and, and the, the news media, they're depicting him as being a pro-Trump voice and, and he's, uh, you know, uh, they call him far right. They call everybody far right.

If you're not far left, then according to the media, you're far right. So they, uh, Milo Yenoplas, uh, much to the surprise was that an airport in New Orleans, Louisiana, and I grabbed him and said, you're Milo Yenoplas, and he said, yes, I am. I said, well, you're under arrest, and they arrested him, and then they put him on an airplane, and they deported him back to England, which is pretty funny. I've got to say, um, and, and, uh, now he's very upset. ABC fake news has this story.

They write their headline, "British far right provocateur, Milo Yenoplas depo...

arrest." And, uh, they, they hated Milo Yenoplas before they're happy that he's deported, but

their angry, angry with Trump for deporting anybody. And ABC fake news writes, "Far right, British political commentator." I, honestly, I don't know what makes him far right, but okay. Milo Yenoplas was deported to the United Kingdom after being detained by immigration and customs enforcement department of Homeland Security, uh, and isn't that fun. Yenoplas was arrested at New Orleans International Airport on Thursday. I wonder where he was flying to, according to the

Department of Homeland Security spokesperson, who is without gender. The spokesperson said in a statement

that Yenoplas is legally, he legally entered the United States in 2019, and he allegedly,

quote, "choes who overstay his welcome in violation of our nation's laws." Yenoplas was issued a final order of removal by an immigration judge on July 22nd after failing to show up

for his immigration hearing. Well, you should show up for your immigration hearing, you know,

you're in a foreign country and all that. Department of Homeland Security confirmed that it had deported Yenoplas on Friday. This administration is working diligently to ensure that aliens in our country illegally can no longer fly unless it's out of our country to self deport the DHS spokesperson said, which is kind of fun. Isn't that, isn't that crazy? And Michael, we got a sound bite of Yenoplas, don't we? Because, and this guy, he was funny for a little while.

I don't know, where I guess he's with Breitbart, right? He's employed by Breitbart as a writer or an editor for Breitbart. And he said, this is the headlines from CNN, CNN's got a funny funny or headline, I think. It's unintentional, of course. But CNN, Milo Yenoplas says he was quote, "terrified." And quote, by the quote, "brutality." And quote, they got a quotation marks around. The word

"terrified." And the word "brutality." And that's it. Of is ice deportation. And isn't that amazing?

And CNN also refers to him as far right provacatur. You see, he's a far right and he's a provacatur because he's not a leftist. You see how that goes. So he got that far right provacatur, Milo Yenoplas, has told TV interviewer Pierre's Morgan that he was really, really terrified after being detained by U.S. immigration officials. Speaking to Pierre's Morgan during an interview released on YouTube, the British National, Milo Yenoplas, didn't even know that 41 years old,

recounted how his hands and feet were chained together with manacles. That may or may not be true. I remember the Biden people did that to a White House staffer who was that Peter Navarro. They shackled Peter Navarro's legs because they grabbed him in an airport, too, as a matter of fact, and they put his legs in shackles. He was a White House staffer. So it's, you know, a Democrat to that to everybody. Don't worry about it. So now we've got a sound by to him talking to Pierre's

Morgan. Here's Milo Yenoplas. He was arrested, he was deported, and now he's talking to English guy, Pierre's Morgan. I don't think I've ever been afraid before, like I was the last week.

Maybe I've lived in especially cosited and cosited life, but I think for the first time

I know what it feels like to be really, really terrified. Really, really terrified. Well, it would be weird, and it would be, you know, you're an airport, you think you're going somewhere. And then you're arrested, and you're put in cuffs, and he says in leg shackles, too, like Peter Navarro was put in leg shackles by the Democrats, and also at an airport. But Milo Yenoplas was in the country illegally, and Peter Navarro was not. Peter Navarro was a White House staffer, and the

Democrats were targeting their political enemies with law enforcement abuses, and, you know,

the usual third world stuff, just amazing. Here is Milo Yenoplas, who was really, really scared,

talking to Pierre's Morgan. I didn't really, I didn't really understand the physical reality of how institutionalized the brutality of the America. They were not managed to arrest you, they put your manacles, your hands, your feet, chain it together. I mean, everybody is arrested, is like an MS-13 gang member, and it hurts a lot more than it looks like on television. It's not true that everybody is put in ankle shackles, and everybody's treated like an MS-13 member.

That's not true.

and an airport who may be fleeing, and all that. But this guy, you know, was on television,

I guess, a lot for a period of time, and big on the internet, and he is an intelligent person, and verbal, good verbal skills, probably got a good education in England or something, and he was kind of funny.

Little did I know. He was British and illegal, and now he's been deported because that's what the

US government is doing now is deporting people around the country illegally, even if they're and CNN and very excited. A big supporter of Trump and so on, here he is with Pierre's Morgan. I was put from a detention facility to a correction facility, no one would tell me anything. I know it's designed to be like that, but it's sure it was humiliating, and it was disorientating or rest of it. It was physically degrading. It's orientating. It was frightening. I don't think I've ever been

frightened like that before. It was disorientating. That's a funny English word. I think his

speciality is aluminium, and it's disorientating. They'd be disorienting, but never mind that.

My low-yenapless with his pal, Pierre's Morgan. The point is that I would say the place is supposed to be deporting criminals. I understand what I'm supposed to be. I'm supposed to be prioritizing, I understand who come, who come in illegally, and who sell people. I understand who murdered, and who raped, and who sold them. I get it. I mean, not doing that.

Well, they're doing that. That's, see, that's, you just veered off there. It is maybe a little bit peculiar that my low-yenapless was arrested at the airport in New Orleans, and deported back to the United Kingdom, as sure he's not a terrorist, as far as I know. And he came to the United States legally in 2019 on a visa, and he actually has frequently at Breitpart in Beyond. He has called for immigration and forcement to be more aggressive in the United States, which, again, another

ironic moment for everyone. He pushes for that, and he's a Trump supporter. CNN reports, "However, Unapolis told Pierre's Morgan, he's very ashamed of having supported Trump right, and now he questioned the effectiveness of the administrations, drive to deport illegal aliens,

my low-yenapless." I think, maybe in the past, I've been a little bit, um, a little bit

blasey when people talk about their trauma, a little bit kind of cavalier when people talk about, you know, stuff kind of kind of lingering with them, but I get it now. And I wouldn't wish it on anyone. And I wouldn't wish it on anyone. And why would you wish it on anyone that would be implied to wish it on anyone? Sure. That's it. And he's now he's embarrassed and CNN focuses on the Trump angle, of course, because they're CNN and all that. But I think we have one, we have one

more of my low-yenapless, Michael. Oh, that's it, okay, I'm sorry. That's it from my low-yenapless. But I found that to be kind of interesting, I guess. I had forgotten all about my low-yenapless, didn't know what had happened to him. I guess at Breitbart. And then he's an illegal alien, and they told him to show up for a hearing and he didn't show up for the hearing. And I think when you're in another country and you're on a visa and you've got a time limit on the visa. And then

you learn that you have a scheduled hearing with a judge that you should probably show up.

And if you don't show up, then you might get handcuffed at the airport in New Orleans and deported back to your home country. Just saying. Just saying. And I don't want to get to this

nitwit Ryan Reynolds. It has always been just fine as an actor, but he started talking,

turns out he's a Canadian, and you know how they are. And he started talking about how he's doing a movie. He's got a movie, and it's said in the 1980s. And he, young and dumb, I guess, thinks that the 1980s were really a tough time, and we were still getting over the Cuban missile crisis. I want to get to that Hollywood actors and Canadians, you know, what are you going to do? Yeah, the Cuban missile crisis really had as rattled in the 1980s. Not a historian, I suppose.

Remarkable. All right, let's, uh, Michael, let's go back to the telephones for, uh, for a moment here. Let's go. Let's go. We've been talking about Maria Berta Romo, having been fired, can, slashed, uh, dropped dumped by Fox News and Fox Business, because she shared sneaky stuff with the, well, and internal memo from the Fox News Management, Fox Business Management. How about, how we're not going to talk about the 2020 election being stolen, and Maria Berta Romo wanted to

talk about the 2020 election. And so she sent, she photographed her, uh, apparently,

Photographed her computer screen with the, uh, management guidance, and she s...

the screenshot to friends at the White House, working for President Trump, saying, hey, look,

here's Fox News. They're not your friends. They're telling us that we can't talk about all this stuff. So Maria Berta Romo sent that over to the, to the Trump White House, and then people in the Trump White House called Fox News Management, and said, hey, what's with this guidance that you can't talk about the thing? So Fox News launched an investigation, I guess, they found out that it was Maria Berta Romo that had sent the, the, the information over, uh, whether they knew it was a screenshot or not.

And so, well, you can't do that. That's internal company business. You can't be sharing it with the politicians, where it's supposed to be covering. So they fired her. And I've got to say, I'm not shocked by, uh, being part, uh, for that. It might even be something that comes up in conversation, but photographing it and sending documentary evidence to, uh, the government when you're a news

organization, uh, would be frowned upon. I think, uh, under most circumstances. I do. All right,

now let's go to, uh, let's go to the phones. Let's go to Donna calling from Frederick Merrilland, Donna, you're on the Chris Plant Show. Good morning, my friend. It's also disorientating.

It is, isn't it? Anyway, but, you know what, to Maria's credit first of all,

I would say it if anyone, and I've been paying attention to her a lot lately, no sense of irony there. She's a woman with integrity and she's even said so and interviews. And I look at this, that I remember when I watched the 2020 elections and what Fox did, we know what Dominion and smartmatic system did. We know about the lawsuit and how they, they had a pay for it. We're going into an election. And I know this is kind of crossing that gray area, but I think she did the right

thing because we're entitled to know it sounds to me like they're trying to cover up their path. They don't want to back up President Trump and this administration and they're controlled by

mm, wonder which banking system. So I think, uh, what Mike said about the NGOs and stuff,

that's relevant, all of it ties in. And, um, maybe just maybe she'll be our next, uh, press secretary.

I personally think she'd do great, and I like Alina Harba, maybe she'd be the next, but either one great with me. Uh huh. I, uh, I like I saw, I saw it in the big board, uh, Donna saying, well maybe Maria Bartiromo should become the White House press secretary, you know, our wonderful White House press secretary is now moved on, uh, uh, gave birth has a little baby child. And, uh, and, uh, she decided to move on and, uh, go to, uh, real life to choose life instead of work.

And, and so the position is open, the vice president of the United States, briefed yesterday. I don't know if you saw any of that, but he was great. Yeah, that did. Yeah, he was fun. He was great. And, uh, in fact, I think we got a thing or two there that we want to get to, uh, uh, uh, of the vice president at the podium and the White House briefing room yesterday. But Maria Bartiromo for, you know, I got to tell you, she's making a lot of money at Fox News. It would be an enormous

pay cut slash to go become the White House press secretary. But then, in theory, after being White House press secretary for a period of time, then she could move on to another, uh, well-paying job. But, uh, it's an interesting one. And I got to tell you. I mean, I worked at CNN for a long, long time. You, um, it would be considered a very poor form, extremely poor form. You know, the government is, uh, not supposed to be whatever the administration and all that, not supposed to be your

buddies. You're supposed to cover them. And as a news organization, you can't allow the perception to go out there that, that you're friendly with and cozy with Republican presidents because you're Fox News. Just because, uh, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, uh, MSNBC are all in bed with every

democratic comes along. Um, it doesn't mean that you can behave the same pay, I think, is the thing.

Uh, but, but fun thought, fun thought on a free apartment room for White House press secretary. She would be great at it. She's great on her feet. Yeah, I just saw Fox News reporting that, um, you know, mom Donnie there and say, uh, 9/11 families of, uh, putting together a petition. Calling on mom Donnie's O-Ron, Kwame, mom Donnie born in Uganda. Uh, I hate the Jews. He's, uh, kind of a fascist and, and he's an

Nazi and, um, mom Donnie calls for mom Donnie to not attend the September 11th, 25th anniversary events in New York City. And now there are calls for Democrat Governor Kathy Hockel, uh, also to not attend the 9/11 ceremony on the 25th anniversary. And, uh, Michael Pearcy just said,

Let's throw in AOC too.

It was actually a hijab, but, uh, she has she's at the, you know, it wasn't they'd love to

bow to Islam. The left does. They, uh, they figure when they get down to killing people again in the 21st century, that they could probably use the help of the, uh, the Islamists, uh, because

there's a lot of murder going on there. Not as much as the left, of course, the left really,

they, they show the way, uh, in that amazing and, uh, uh, remarkable stuff. But it's, uh, I think

it's funny. I throw in, uh, AOC don't invite her either. She got, she, she, she could wear her, uh, Shador when she goes to the, when she goes to the 9/11 ceremony to show that she's in touch with her feelings or something, uh, pretty, uh, pretty amazing stuff. You guys, I'm telling you.

All right. I've got, uh, this Hollywood movie star Ryan Reynolds. They, uh, he's, he's got a movie coming

out. And he's always seemed to be a pretty normal person, but somebody should have spoken to him

before he went and did this interview because he said some really dumb things about the 1980s, about the 1980s. Now, he's a Canadian person, which is not the same as being an American.

It's Canada is like, um, if America had a dad that went around and cheated and, um, um, um,

you know, out of, out of wood like, Canada would be like our bastard child. Canada is kind of like, uh, it's like a junior state. It's not really like a state. But he's a Canadian Ryan Reynolds, and he's doing a movie about the 1980s. Well, you hear what he has to say about the 1980s. I, I get the impression he wasn't there. He, uh, he doesn't know anything about the 1980s. Whether he's in a movie about the 1980s or not, but you got to hear this guy coming up because he, um,

he's, maybe you'll see the movie, maybe you won't.

Compare and Explore