The Jordan Harbinger Show
The Jordan Harbinger Show

1323: Todd Rose | The Collective Illusions Tearing America Apart

5/7/20261:28:4619,146 words
0:000:00

90% of Americans privately agree on most issues, yet publicly act like enemies. Author Todd Rose unmasks the collective illusions fueling our division.Full show notes and resources can be found here:...

Transcript

EN

Coming up next on the Jordan Harvinger show close to almost half of Americans...

Americans are the greatest threat once you realize that this is a war that we're losing

we didn't even know we're fighting. You can't beat us mill laterally or even economically if we're

really got our act together. So what would you do? What you do is you actually destroy the social trust the very fabric, right? Like you actually start to get us to see each other as enemies. This is really effective. If we really were that divided, if we really did have these wacky beliefs that we were couldn't solve it around, we should say it. It's just not true. Welcome to the show. I'm Jordan Harvinger. On the Jordan Harvinger show we decode the

stories secrets and skills of the world's most fascinating people and turn their wisdom into practical advice that you can use to impact your own life and those around you. Our mission is to

help you become a better informed, more critical thinker, through long-form conversations with

a variety of amazing folks. Spies, CEOs, athletes, authors, thinkers, performers. Even the occasional former cult member, Fortune 500 CEO or Russian chess grandmaster, if you're new to the show or you

want to tell your friends about the show, I suggest our episode starter packs. These are collections

of some of our favorite episodes on topics like persuasion and negotiations, psychology and geopolitics, disinformation, China, North Korea, crime and cults and more. It'll help new listeners get a taste of everything we do here on the show. Just visit Jordan Harvinger.com/start or search for us in your spot if I have to get started. Today on the show, apparently, we're all lying. Not in the fun. Yeah, I read the article kind of way, but more like we are collectively pretending

to believe things that almost nobody actually believes, which sounds insane until you realize it explains basically everything. Why people panic by toilet paper like it's currency? Why politicians chase opinions that don't even really exist? Why everyone online sounds like a radical and everybody in real life doesn't. Today's guest Todd Rose calls this collective illusions, basically social lies that we all participate in because we think everyone else believes them.

On most controversial issues in the United States, something like 90% of people privately agree, but publicly they act like they're at war. So yeah, it turns out we're actually not that divided. We're just confused, insecure, and copying each other like middle schoolers trying to fit in.

And the internet makes the whole thing a million times worse. Today we'll break down

why you might be agreeing with things you don't actually believe. How social media manufacturers fake majorities, why you're brain literally rewards you for conforming like a lab rat, and how this whole thing quietly wrecks trust, politics, and your sanity. All this and more today here on the show with Todd Rose. Here we go. I really got into this book. It might actually sound kind of weird, but I found it quite a relief

that basically everyone is a hypocrite of some kind and lying to each other. And I know that sounds odd. People are listening and they're like, what are you talking about? I'm not a hypocrite. But here me out, the idea that we don't tell the truth about what we believe is actually kind of a good thing and maybe we begin with the story of Elm Hollow where the moral is. Everyone's a hypocrite, basically. That's right. When I was running the book, I found this story. It was really the first

major collective illusion, but it was actually happened to be the very first public opinion study ever done. This guy Richard Shink, this was right for Gallup was formed and everything and he said, I want to know how people form their opinions. So he did his dissertation. He went and lived in this small community. He called it Elm Hollow as an Upstate New York. And it was a kind of religious community a little bit, tightly knit. Yeah, first he gave everyone this survey just to kind of get

there are opinions. And he asked a lot about church stuff. You were at supposed to play face cards. You didn't drink alcohol, but it was like super conservative. Yeah, like can't play cards. Holy smoke. Yeah, face cards apparently. And so they're asking a bunch of other attitudes. And he said, okay, I got the baseline and he goes, but after six months, I actually drank alcohol and played cards with everybody in this community in the privacy of their own home. And he's like, everybody's

lying and he was like, what would leave them to lie like that? He did something really clever, which then we just have copied like crazy in our research. He decided to give him another survey, but instead of asking them their own opinions, he said, what do you think most people

in the community believe on these issues? And that's what he found out. He's, oh,

they all think everybody else believes this stuff. They don't personally, but they don't like

it kicked out of the group. So they're going along. Now, here's what's wild. He figures out,

like, wait a minute, how could they be so wrong about their group? I mean, just talk to each other. It turns out that there was this one old woman. And he called her Mrs. Salt. And she was one of those like true believers, like fire and brimstone, religious thing. Her dad was a preacher back in the day. She also happened to be the biggest donor to the church in the town. So like everybody was afraid of her, that pastor wouldn't really push back because you wanted to get a paycheck. And so

She would just tell people out is, should shut them down, should cancel them.

sort of just assumed she was speaking for the group. And she dies. And it doesn't take very long. For everyone's like, wait, hold on, they're playing cards at the funeral. Yeah, there's no richer shank goes to the pastor. He goes, you got to do something. People all believe this. And so he had the pastor show up at a church event and play cards. And then the gossips are the pastors playing. And they're like, yeah, you can play cards. That wasn't ever a

rule. You just believed it. That was a Mrs. Salt thing. And she's gone now. We don't have to worry about her. In that case, let me go get the whiskey I've been holding in my cabinet for three years. As far as it's not a new bottle from Costco. Yes. So funny. So that was the very first time that ever tried to look at public opinion. And the first thing they find is people don't tell the truth. Because they want to be part of their group. But it turns out we're really, really bad at reading

what our groups believe. Because our brains have this really flimsy shortcut. Your brain assumes

the loudest voices repeated the most are the majority. So that's why a Mrs. Salt being the only one

speaking. Look, she speaks forever. So no big deal. You can happen these small communities. It wasn't until social media. Yeah. That this became a runaway train. In fact, it's funny in the 70s and 80s. Psychologists were like, this happens when you're wrong about your group. Because that's all clicked. Those are their group think. But you're wrong about the group. So it's a collective illusion. It's like a social lie. So it's just not true. We can form

because we are doing what we think others want. But then we're just doing what nobody wants. But nobody wants. And so we all have a conformity bias. Our brains are wired to be with groups. It's survival. But then again, how do you know what your group believes? And so the short cut of loudest voice repeated the most, it's quite like efficient. And it must have worked to evolve. Right? You were accurate enough. And in most communities at some point, you could just

pull your neighbor, saying, go, hold on. Do you really believe this? But you go into social media

without any destroying effects. But we'll talk about that too because countries are weaponizing this.

And if you look at like X right now, the platform, 80% of all content on X is generated by only 10% of users. That totally makes sense. Whenever I see a crazy tweet, there's somebody shares something

with me. I always go like, oh, I wonder who this person is. And you can see that they've tweeted

48 times that day. And I'm like, that's more than I've tweeted in the last decade. It's all they do. And then Pew research actually studied this 10%. And they found like, they are not remotely representative of the public. They're extreme on everything. No, the fringe cooks. Yeah, yeah, they are. And so they're really loud. But here's the problem now. If 10% of the country holds a view, you think it's 80%. Unless you're willing to go against your group, you're just saying nothing

or you'll start saying what you think you're supposed to say. And suddenly, the results are collective illusion. That makes sense. My friend is a teacher. And I was like, hey, I heard that every kid wants to be a famous YouTuber. And she is like, yeah, they all want to be famous YouTubers. And then she came back a couple of weeks or months later. And she's like, you know, actually, remember when you asked me that, it turns out that they think some of these YouTube people are

cool. But when we actually talked about what we really wanted to do. Now, I'm going to be a rock star astronaut when you actually talked about what sort of path are you thinking of taking? It was the same

as it's always like, my own way, dad's a lawyer. And that seems kind of interesting or like,

I really like watching true crimes. So I thought maybe it'd be an investigator. One kid wanted to be a YouTuber, of course, or two, but it wasn't like the whole class. But if you ask the class and everyone has to raise their hand, it's like, I want to meet a YouTuber and everyone's like, oh, that sounds cool because it's kind of a larp their plan. And it's in front of everyone else. But it's like, when you really sit down, it's like, no, no, no, I want to go to dental school. What's funny about

that is that's where I'm at. You just nailed exactly like, so if I think tank, we do this private opinion

research. It's not just what you'll say out loud, but what do you really believe? And we can get around that sort of social pressure. And we did a massive study on what you mean by a successful life. The illusion is we think everybody wants to be famous, like the number one tray of priority. And rich, right, as well. And rich, that's the second one. They're all status related. There's what we think everyone wants. In reality, those are like bottom quartile.

You want to have a minded live your life. But like, the tops are all like what you actually be happy with. People want to contribute. They want to be in their community. They want to have good

relationships. The problem is that if I think everybody wants to be famous, and I'm sitting in a

group and like these kids. And we see this with younger people. They're like, yeah, I want to be an influencer and like, do you? And it's like, not really, but if you say it, it's like performative. I know that I think this is what everyone thinks is really cool and successful. So I'm going to say that. Well, of course, you saying it is more evidence to everybody else that we all want to be that. When somebody says that the other kids are going, yeah, not really, but I don't want to be the

guys like I want to be a dentist. Everyone will make fun of me. So I'll just find I'll say I want to be a

Fitness influencer too.

everybody, where it's like, in this particular moment, that sounds like something that would be fun

for a day as a job, though. I don't know. And so you see these people who like, even like,

more extreme takes, I've got a friend who was like, we should stop all immigration. I was like, do you really think we should stop all immigration? And they're like, not like doctors from other countries and they're like, what about software engineers? Like, I don't know. I mean, we probably need some of them. And it's like, so basically, you don't want to stop most of the immigration that's actually happening. You just don't want people to jump over the wall thousands per day

unmitigated in the Southern border like you're watching on whatever news channel you watch. But you don't actually want to stop all of the immigration. You're just agreeing with like a literal Nazi on X because they said this thing that sort of in the moment got you charged up an emotional, but your parents are from China, dude. What are you talking about? Exactly. We see this all the times. So like, they'll be this fringe. We have in our data on immigration. Like actually super

majority of Americans across all stripes are like, I don't want to close the border entirely. It's why would we do that? They really like legal immigration. They do worry about not knowing

who's coming in. That's fine. But then the problem is is the fringes are really good at coming up

with slogans that actually reflect their crazy views. And people go, remember like, abolish ice

and we're like, a lot of my sort of normie friends were like, no, I don't like what they're doing. I'm like, you're saying abolish it. And they're like, well, they don't mean abolish them. No, they actually do. You're just repeating this. We saw that the best example in our data is remember the defund the police movement. Yeah, it was going to say defund the police. So can't write a place? No, not really. It just makes them stop shooting people for no reason. Okay,

but that's not as catchy. That's very different. And so we actually got pulled in with the Biden administration because they had read the book. And they were like, so what if we're dealing with any illusions here, I'm like, sure, are like at the peak 60% of Democrats publicly said they supported defunding the police. It was 9% in private. 9% in private. You can get 9% of people to read anything. Like, so the administration was like, oh, no, that one's real. We get a lot of calls from 10 people

over and over again. So we got one line in the state of the union address. It was that it was the state of union where the Ukraine crisis had blown up to. And he said, it's not defund the police. It's fund the police because we're like, your constituents don't believe this. And if you go out in public and endorse this, it's going to be on you. What's so funny is, is we're all susceptible to it. But what we find in our researchers, like three groups of people who are the most susceptible,

young people, which makes sense. They really want to fit in CEOs because you're like, "What are my customers think? What are my employees think?" And politicians who are like, "What's with the wind blowing?" You know what it reminds me of? I don't do politics that much on the show, but I feel like this is relevant. Somehow certain Democratic politicians got it in their head that the most concerning thing in the entire country was like whether trans people could

be in sports or something like that. And then the Republican side was like, oh, we have to talk about this thing that they're talking about. And also it's a great opportunity to show how crazy out of touch these people are. And so everyone's talking about that. And I remember talking to some of my super conservative friends and some of my super, almost comedy, liberal, you know, friends. And they were like, do you care about this? Because we don't care about this. And I was like,

I don't think most people actually care that much about this. I think everybody is,

why is this the thing that's taking up all the airtime? And it was weird to see like my almost fascist level right wing friends in my like almost cookie, comedy level friends and everyone in

between be like, I'm pretty sure we agree that this is not the most important issue going on

in the country right now. Like what the hell? You're getting a something really important is like because of our social media saturated worlds out that it's so easy for these vocal fringes to end up masquerading as majorities, which it has two effects, right? Like one, it's wait. So let's say I'm a Republican. I'm like, these people believe this. So first of all, in my group, I'm Democrat. I'm like, oh, I guess we're supposed to be over here. So we start repeating the, yeah, we should defund the

police. We're like, you don't believe that. Nobody believes this. But then if I'm a Republican, like, what the hell is going on with these people? So it's sort of like pulls everybody to the extremes in a way that is just nuts. And I feel bad. I think that the whole trans thing is a perfect example because it's the first real hyper online movement. So it's made it deeply susceptible to collective illusions. The thing that makes me sad is there is a small bunch of people who really do

struggle with us who need help and just want to live their lives. They don't care about college sports. They're coming after kids. They're like, I need hormones to live. And they're the ones that end up getting screwed out of this. For sure. Yeah, no, I've got a friend who's she's an older lady

now. She's the first trans person I ever met because I didn't even know that existed when I met her

25 years ago. And she'd already like lived her life and had kids and was married and everything.

I was like, hey, friend, a friend, how much do you care about this?

I can't even explain to you even if we only focus on the trans thing. The sports thing is like,

not even making the top 10. She's like, we need to have people stop killing us for no reason.

That's kind of up there. Maybe the right to just go to the dang restroom without having somebody chase me in there, stuff like that. And so it was just like you said, an illusion where everyone's, oh my god, everyone's so concerned about whether this person can join the Olympics. And it's, no, this is a weird clickbait headline that just got way too much airtime and runaway energy and fringe people who wanted to make a name for themselves as like pro or against this.

You'd think, oh, this guy is millions of followers. And then you look at their actual whatever platform where they make money. You're like, this guy has 3000 actual people supporting him. So this is such a good example because we've found this exact phenomenon over 100 issues in the country right now. But what we just walk through, this is the consequence. You took something that was tricky and we're trying to learn how to deal with it and societies are progressing by expanding

who we include in its hard. And these people just want to do their life. And then some fringe is able to manufacture the illusion that a subset, this is what this party believes and everyone's like tribal and they go to their little group because they want to belong in their wrong. But now they've pushed it and the other side's like, hey, that's crazy. Let's go to the further extreme. And now all of a sudden it dominates the discourse. It shubs out the space of like things

we actually care about. It makes solving this problem almost impossible. And the end result is it harms the actual people who just need hormones and the destruction of social trust and the sense of false polarization that I'm sitting there going, you cannot believe this crazy thing.

When someone says they actually want to defund the police, I'm like, I will be the first to tell you

the police should abide by the laws and should not violate your rights. And we should have gotten rid of qualified immunity. There's lots of stuff we could do. I do not want to defund the police. And anyone that tells me that's a good idea, I'm like, you're crazy. Is it dude? Have you seen the purge? That's not gonna work. Not how it works. And so then I'm like, now imagine across a hundred issues and it's the most fundamental values we have as a society

if I'm wrong about what most people believe. And I'm like, hold on. You don't believe in dignity. You don't believe in this. You don't believe in debt. You don't believe in free speech. I don't think I have anything in common with my fellow Americans now. I lose trust in each other. And it just, it's a downward spiral. And so this is the thing is like, even though illusions are social lies, they're self-fulfilling if you don't do something about it. And they can destroy

entire countries. Yeah, I think right now, and I wonder if this is a collective illusion,

it seems like if you go online right now and you look at anything having to do with Israel or something, they'll be a guy who posts some sort of Nazi thing. I get this all the time. I get why I want to throw you in the oven like your grandpa or whatever. And I'm like, okay, if you look at who's saying that online, it's oh my god, 80% of people online hate Jews and want to kill me for no reason. And then you look at other folks and you're like, this is like a lot of

bot activity. These Nazis are terminally online, even Nazi influencers. I'm like, this guy would have been a crypto influencer five years ago. He's just happens to pick up on the Nazi thing now. And he's wearing a Nazi shirt. He's got his Nazi tats. And I'm like, this is just a grifter who found a niche. This guy would have picked something else if this wasn't trending on social media. And people are like 100,000 people follow him. And I'm like, yeah, 50,000 are bots 20,000 are like journalists who

are like, holy shit, or Nazi on social media. And the other 30 are like, maybe on the fence and teenagers. So it's bad. But it's not like this Nazi has an army behind him. He's a tool. He's an

influencer. He might as well be selling protein shakes. Yes, exactly right. It's crazy. There's always

going to be a tiny fringe of people that hold batshit crazy ideas. That's always been true. It'll always be true. And then what we've been part of a coalition that's been studying, not just collective illusions that we uncover. But the fact that foreign entities have figured this out and weaponized it, whatever people think is going on is so much worse. So here's a thing. Like, I will tell you just for disclosure, a lot of this started for me after October 7th. So I was

actually on vacation. And I got a call and there was a you need to come to Tel Aviv. And I'm like,

in a war, we think we've uncovered something that relates to collective illusions. But we need to show you. And it turns out that there was really solid proof that foreign entities, China, Iran was particularly at play and Russia. In this case, China was manipulate in the agro than the TikTok to drive anti-Semitic sentiment. China didn't care. They weren't like, hey, we hate Jews. It was actually more, this was a psychological weapon that you can refine this way so that when they try to take

Taiwan, they can get our young people streaming out into the streets in protest. Very, very effective. But what we found, and I say we brought there's a lot of people in this now, is I would put it this way. We were losing a war that we didn't even know we were fighting in the space of propaganda

Manipulation.

Oh, I've heard of this. Yeah. So good. So Barbara took one, and historian, her thesis was basically

that the reason that war was so bloody and awful was that the technology for war had changed exponentially, but the mindset about war hadn't. And so they built strategies like we're going to fight over small amounts of land. We're going to dig trenches. Yeah. But now you have machine guns and chemical

weapons. You're not just firing muskets at each other. And I think we have a guns of August moment

here in the former propaganda where we've been taught to think that these state sponsor actors so disinformation, it's actually not really true. That's not terribly effective. What they do is they can manufacture collective illusions. Very easily with bots, and now with AI enabled bots that we've been tracking, very easy to get you to believe that your community believes something they do not. And then your conformity bias kicks in, you start acting. And it's like to me, like the way drones

have changed war with the shade drone or whatever. Here's my $50,000 drone against your $5 million dollar interceptor building a bot army and sewing discontent and distrust and manufacturing illusions in another country is so cheap. It is. Yeah. And so effective. And right now, for example, conservative estimates. So we know from the research that if your interactions online are about 5% with bots, if the bots are well designed, they can guarantee what consensus in that group

will be. They can drive it. Conservative estimates on social media is a quarter of all your interactions

are with bots. I totally believe that I mean, the people who say, I'm going to turn your family into a

bar. So like I got that comment the other day. I always look at it and it's like a picture of a

totally normal looking person that's probably AI. They have two followers. They have four posts. And they're all like weird photos that look AI. It's like a picture of a book or something or like a meme of a Jewish person. And then it's like following 3,000 people. And I'm like, I bet you that if I work for Instagram or meta, I could look and see account created three days ago, immediately followed 3,000 totally random people. And then follows everyone who interacts with

it online. I mean, it's just obviously fake nonsense. And the thing is is what they've gotten really good at too is the bot armies. Now with AI, though, if I want to shape your view and get you to be like someone who will start to speak up for things you didn't even believe in to begin with. So it's the bots that amplify and then there's entire bots that are dedicated to comment threads.

So the first three comments and the thread basically dictate the tone of the thread. And so I get you

to post about something because you think it's the right thing to say. And then the bots will also go in. In addition to retweeting you will actually go in and basically verbally confirm that you're so smart or if you say the wrong thing, they attack you. And they condition you into a certain behavior like, oh, this is what my group believes exactly. So effective. I had a post like this. It was from Cory Drone. He writes about technology and stuff. And he said, yeah, there's an

Israeli tech company that is actually working with Delta Airlines right now where they do is like algorithmic pricing. It's like they find out who you are based on your IP and they might charge you more if you're in Silicon Valley or more or less. And not everyone knew about that. And I was like, oh, man, people are going to be so pissed at Delta Airlines when they find out that they're doing this. No, the top comment was, of course, the Jews are doing this to us. And I was like, Delta Airlines are

Jews. And they're like, no, dummy. The first thing he said was Israel's doing this to us. And I was like, no, a company based in Israel is hired by an American airline in all of the American Airlines to do this to you. It's not the Jews. You absolute nincompoop. And it was just like, didn't matter. And then people were like, oh, Jordan's getting ratioed here. How we're on to you. And I'm like, to me, what do I have to do with it? It's my post. I'm the one that put this out there. What are you

talking about? And it was just these comments had hundreds of uploads. And I was like, this just does not seem like normal people activity. It is so manufactured. China's been really great at Russia's been doing it for a while, but Iran mastered it. And it's so clever. So if we take away the like awfulness of it, that's really smart. You can't beat us militarily. I'll tell you. So we have more private opinion data on the American public than anybody. We predicted Trump's final

boat percentage in the last election within a half a percentage point six months in advance. Because Gen Z was not telling the truth. Black and brown men were not telling the truth about their willing to vote for them. So I'm just say that because when you look at the private views, it's a completely different country. We are so similar in our views. It's hilarious. And then you

look at the public opinion. And we look like we're this close to civil war. Yes, that's what people

are saying. We're so close to a civil war. And it's interesting because, man, I'm in such a bubble because I know Jewish people here, obviously. And they're like, I carry a gun now because I have so many threats against me. But it's not, I don't really trust my neighbors less. They're fine.

Nobody's done anything to me yet.

all this. But guess what? That's an army of bots. Yeah, any Ron or trying to, in fact, I watch this

documentary recently about Jamal Khashoggi, the journalist that got murdered in the Turkish embassy by Saudi Arabia for those who don't know. And they were talking about how he got his profile initially got big and it was on Twitter. And they exposed the bot farm in Saudi Arabia. And there were some like 10,000 people there in this building. And each one of them had maybe a few dozen or a hundred accounts or something. And they were using these decks to tweet in manufacturer this.

And now you can do most of that probably with AI and Jamal Khashoggi would be like, hey, I kind of disagree with this thing that Mohammed bin Salman did. And it would be like thousands of people be like, you're our traitor. We're going to kill you. And it just turned out to mostly be bot activity. And then of course, they murdered him in the embassy. But that was the government doing that.

It wasn't like he couldn't walk down the street because civilians were all angry at him.

Oh, there's that journalist, no one wanted to kill him other than the government. And they made it sound like, oh, he had so many enemies. Look at that guy. And if you think about it, what it does is it creates a cover for a behavior like that was unacceptable. It's kind of like he had to come with lots of people felt. But it's so easy to do once you realize that this is a war that we're losing. We didn't even know we're fighting. If you think about my friend Mike Milkin

gave me this, so I want to credit him, when we start uncovering these things. And we found like this AI enabled bot farm that China was running through Pakistan. And they were going after the American dream. And I was like, that's weird. Why waste your time? And it's like, look, Mike's like, you can't beat us mill laterally or even economically if we're really got our act together. So what would you do? What you do is you actually destroy the social trust, the very fabric, right? You

actually start to get us to see each other as enemies. And you think about right now was it close to almost half of Americans think other Americans are the greatest threat? This is really effective. If it were true, then we should call a spade a spade. If we really were that divided, if we really did have these wacky beliefs that we were cutting solid it around, we should say it, it's just not true. And the reason I bring this up is that the distinction between

private truths and public lies is important because the way you solve it is very different. Now I invite you to blindly and uncritically follow us into this ad break. We'll be right back. This episode is sponsored and part by Simply Safe. Have you ever looked into home security system and then you just backed out once you saw the contract? These traditional systems, they want you locked into multi-year deals, huge cancellation fees, it feels like something you just can't escape.

That's what I love about Simply Safe. They flip the whole model. You get really solid 24/7

professional monitoring, but without being locked into some long-term contract. As the person responsible for protecting this house, whatever appreciated most about Simply Safe is how easy it is to live with. Set up way easier than I expected, especially when Jen did it all. If she could do it, it's okay, you arema actually is going to kill me. Armut, when you leave, disarmut, when you get back, it's simple. The peace of mind is huge, especially in the evenings and when we're traveling,

customize it with sensors, cameras, all of it. It's not just break-ins, it's fires, floods, the whole picture, and if something actually happens, there are real people monitoring 24/7 who can dispatch help right away. We don't put our name behind many brands, but we trust Simply Safe. Our listeners will get

50% off a new system when you sign up for a professional monitoring and your first month is free

by visiting SimplySafe.com/jordan. That's half off at SimplySafe.com/jordan. There's no safe, like SimplySafe. This episode is also sponsored by Progressive. Insurance isn't one size fits

all, and shopping for it shouldn't feel like squeezing into something that doesn't fit. That's why

drivers have enjoyed Progressive's name your price tool for years. With the name your price tool, you tell them what you want to pay, and they'll show you options that fit your budget. Enough hunting for discounts, trying to calculate rates, tinkering with coverages. Maybe you're picking out your very first policy. Maybe you're looking for something that just works better for you and your family. Either way, they make it simple to see your options, no guesswork, no surprises.

Ready to see how easy and fun shopping for car insurance can be? Visit Progressive.com and give the name your price tool a try. Take the stress out of shopping and find coverage that fits your life on your terms. Progressive, casualty, insurance, company, and affiliates. Price and coverage match limited by state law. If you want to create real connections with other people in real life as well as online, I highly recommend our course six minute networking.

It's totally free. There's no shenanigans. It's not cringey. It's not going to make you look bad or weird. It'll just make you a better connector, better colleague and a better friend. In about six minutes a day is all these steps taken. Hey, many of the guests on our show subscribe and contribute to the course. So come on and join us. You'll be in smart company where you belong. The course, again, all free six minute networking.com. Now back to Todd Rose.

We can't just say, hey, new legislation, you have to tell the truth about the things you

believe on the internet. You can't do that. From my mind, it's not really a legislative salt, right? There's some things that are going on. Remember, one thing that has helped a little bit as we start to teach people maybe the people who listen to or just bots and they're not like

Representative anything when X did the sudden reveal of the location of all t...

if you ever this. I was going to bring this up. Yes, where so for those who don't know, it was like American Patriot 1, 2, 3, 4. She's been tweeting hardcore about the influx of immigrants and how they're taking all the jobs. And then X, yeah, Elon at X, love him or hate him. He was kind of like, I'm going to make it possible for everyone to see where these accounts were created. And it was all like Nigeria, Bangladesh, Pakistan. And it's like, these accounts are created and being used.

This person's not American. This is not the white blanchick on the profile photo. No, it's a bot in Bangladesh. That's all it is. My colleagues were the ones that worked with him on it around this. You can't give people a heads up that this is going to happen because they'll do it. So you just all shouldn't sprung it on people. It became this game of like, oh, really? You say you're a maga supporter. You're literally in Bangladesh. Or and you realize like how much of it was just

bullshit. I saw somebody tracking these and it was like this influencer who had 300,000 subscribers and tweeted almost exclusively about immigration as soon as they got exposed that they were in Nigeria. They shut their account down three days later because they were like, well, the jig is up. No one believes that I'm Pam from Nebraska anymore. So I'm done. This is over. So we're doing some things like little help. But ultimately, I do think one thing is

we have to get to the place individually where we realize you cannot trust your brain to tell you what your group thinks anymore. You can't. It is just impossible. I'm pretty sure like the number of my super liberal friends who were like, yeah, I defund the police. I put that up there. I'm like, you don't believe it, but they're like so convinced. And they tell themselves, well, they don't really mean defund it. But that's just a way to be like,

I don't want to go against my group. They're like, no, I'm sure that this is what they believe.

So it feels like you're just wrong. You have to stop by saying like, whatever you think

your group believes, you just take with a grain of salt, which is not a bad thing in the sense that we should get back to trying to think for yourself just a little bit, not the worst thing in the world. Yeah, not the worst thing in the world. It does surprise me that part of it is just it makes you shake your head because you look at somebody like, I don't know, Dan Bills area and he's like, I'm going to run for Congress and the Jews are doing this. And it's like,

how dumb do you have to be to follow somebody like this? How dumb do you have to be to look up to somebody like this? What is going wrong in your life where this person is an influence on you that you don't think is negative. Nothing about this person stands out. What's interesting to me in this space is one of the most frightening private opinion pieces of data we have is the amount of resentment in America right now. It is significantly higher during the Great Depression. The number

of people who think society is just unfair and are resentful about it. The problem is at a

neuroscience level when you become resentful, it's a signal like stop cooperating. You're getting screwed. It's time to compete. So you become zero sum in your thinking and sort of burn it down. The behavioral economics research on this is so funny, but where it's if we're playing a trust game and you start to screw me, I will zero you out even if I get nothing. I could sell five dollars but you get 10. Screw you. We're both getting zero. It kind of explains the behavior in society right

now where we're just like, and now under resentment, I don't know how much you've read like Renée Girard, which on memetic desire worth reading. It is so good. So he basically showed that as humans we copy, right? We imitate including what other people desire. But one of the things that he was really good at was showing that once we get into this rivalry where we're all resentful

and competing, ultimately it leads to you need to scapegoat, right? Why am I getting screwed?

And Jews have historically always been a great scapegoat because they punch above their weight.

They're small enough to not be able to do anything about it and successful enough to like, but it's plausible. They might control everything. And so then it's like, my life sucks. I'm resentful. I don't play have any power. They're telling me this group that I probably don't even know very many people is the cause of all my problems. Get them. I follow these people, some on social media and what they do is that they'll go on,

I think it's illegal. One of these chat things where you can just chat with a random person and it matches you and they'll go on there and they're talking to people who hate Jews and they post it. And there's one guy who pretends to also not like Jews, but he's Jewish and he's a comedian. He asks people like, how many Jews do you think there are in the guys who like dude?

There's at least one billion. And he's like, what if I told you, there were only 15 million.

And they're like, that's ridiculous man. You got to Google that and he's I did. Google it yourself. 15 million. Well, wait, the Jews control Google and it's no think about it. You're telling me

that half the world's population is Jewish and that's why you're oppressed. It's a smaller number.

And wow, how can they do all this when there are only that many people in the guys? It's almost like they're not doing all this. And then it's like fish chat ends because the guys are away. It can't be that. It's exactly right. And it's what's sad about this particular one is we found right after October 7th. The thing that had gotten every nervous was Harvard Harris had released a poll that said 61%. I think it was right of Gen Z said how Moss was justified. So not that like care about innocent

kids. Like the rape and murder of 1200 innocent people was justified. It was like if that's even

Close to true, that is terrifying.

No, it never was higher than 7%. And because of the ability to manufacture these illusions,

they were targeted directly at Gen Z. And then you get them streamed out and you remember the I remember one video of the young woman. At least she was honest about it. They were protesting

and some of the interviewer and she asked for it. What do we mad at again? What do we hear for?

So it's so effective to get that. So then what we found was once we realized that this was intentional and we started helping with a bunch of other agencies to start throttling down some of this fake content. You watched even their public belief in it just collapse as the content disappeared. So it's like, and again, look, reasonable people can have different views of what's going on in the Middle East right now. And anyone that doesn't care about innocent women and children

is a monster. But when these illusions take hold and the fringes start to dominate our discourse

there, it now becomes almost impossible to solve it at all. And we're left with the thing

that's scary about the scapegoating is historically it usually just ends in violence, right? It ends in violence toward the scapegoat and then the thing resets. It does. It's a complicated situation because a lot of these golf countries, for example, manufacturing a lot of animosity towards this real. But if what is that? If metaphor is the dog chasing the car, I guarantee you that if Saudi Arabia and all these other golf countries, let's say they weren't going to work with

this real like they are and create peace now. Those leaders would be in deep trouble if they couldn't say, oh, it's Israeli's fault. We can't do this. Hey, this is what enemy of my enemy keeps me from having to get dethroned. Exactly. In this country, there's a joke where we go cube is about to find out why we don't have free health care. They're going to get some freedom. Yeah, man's going to find out. We don't have free health care. They're going to get bombed and it's crazy.

But if this is what a lot of leaders in other parts of the world are doing, they're like, okay, we really need to lean on. Hey, it's the Jews or hey, it's Israel or people do it with Iran too. Like, oh, we can't do this. We got to have ballwork against Iran and it's all there because in many ways, if we don't do this, it's wait. How come you're a trillion air and I'm a subsistence farmer? Like, people are going to start asking very uncomfortable questions about why this dude has two

yachts, one for his mistress is from Russia and the other once for his wife. It's a hundred percent and it's so easy to activate that every time I like allergic to politics, I like registered in a pendantite. Like, I think they're all just terrible. But my favorite is when my otherwise reasonable progressive friends have a view of Trump, which may or may not be right as this narcissistic social path and they're like, and he's completely controlled by the Jews. And I'm like,

okay, so on the one hand, here's a guy that doesn't care about anybody else and just wants his ego and yet doesn't make any sense. Jeffrey Epstein's something something blackmail tape, something something net in Yahoo. I mean, you really have to go down this weird web rabbit hole of everybody's in the Mossad and everybody has p tapes with Donald Trump and dot dot dot the Jews.

That's why people get more ridiculous with it because you have to make more and more crazy

reaps in order to make it make sense, because otherwise it doesn't make sense. And the other explanation is, hey, this doesn't really add up. And it's no, what if we add in this other crazy conspiracy theory? Now it all adds up. Layers and layers. Yeah, conspiracy theorists, what they do is they connect dots that are not there. That's what a conspiracy is. What's funny is is all the people that do this and then they're like, you know, those dumb Q and on people. I'm like,

you sound very similar. I hate to tell you. Yeah, it's crazy to me. But it does seem like it's again, the majority of people believe this, but it's good to know it's not the case because that would be terrifying. Honestly, like, if I didn't do the research, if I didn't have the data, it still feels to me. It does feel that way. People are going to go, I feel like Todd is wrong, because when I read the book, I was like, I feel like you're wrong, but there's data that says

that it's not wrong. So why do I still feel like you are because of what I'm looking at online? Yeah, it's exactly right. And the easiest way out of this is touch grass for just a minute and go have one conversation with your neighbor. Like, it's comical, how fast you're like, oh, and then it'll be like, okay, so maybe not my neighbor. But we're like, okay, talk to another person. It's crazy how fast you're like, oh, I'll give you an example. I thought it was funny. So we look at

the research on highly polarized issues. So abortion, for example. It splits in the abstract at identity level as pro life pro choice and those people are like, die hard in those camps. And they think the other side isn't just wrong. They think the other side's evil, right? You their hate women or you want to kill babies and they're just real no gray or no nuance. Yeah. But then we have these

methods that will take that and break it down into its concrete like, okay, what does that mean?

From a policy standpoint, it's 70% of Americans are literally identical identical in their views.

Yeah, we should probably not make it that easy in the third trimester, you know, life of the

mother rape, incest, otherwise someone's got to make this choice or it's like a very nuanced that you have like, over consensus on. And yet the people that have the identical profiles split almost evenly as pro life pro choice. And they're like, those people, I'm like, they're you. They literally believe the same thing you do. And we've got to this point of false

Polarization where we just see each other as bad.

It's crazy that it's the virtue signaling that's polarized and different, but the actual beliefs

are very similar, if not the same. That's what's crazy to me. It is wild. Right now you'll have,

for example, you take any issue. When it comes to say the DEI stuff versus like turns out overwhelming majority of Americans out across every demographic are like, yeah, there is some discrimination. That's not okay. But also we believe in meritocracy. And there are ways to solve this that don't require discriminating against other people in return. And you're like, yeah, that's a very sound position. It's just not what the fringe is on either side, believe. But they're

so convinced everybody has these extreme views and that they have to essentially pick aside. And so if you're a Democrat, you're like, I don't hate minorities. So I guess I got to go over here. And I'm anti-racist now. Or if you're Republican, you're like, I do think we should acknowledge that racism's real and sexism's real. And it's like, oh, are you that progressive? So now you're like, ah, but now see you go over here. You're like, it's not a problem. I'm going to lose my seat.

If I mentioned this in public, yeah, of course, exactly. Wow. It's a little bit scary. We're so beholden to these collective illusions. And like the cognitive dissonance, probably that we would have to endure to break out of that is also going to be highly uncomfortable. It's going to be uncomfortable. But this is why there's a couple of ways out of it, right? One is individuals that

deal with the dissonance, right, which trust me, your life is way better. If you want to conform

and go with group think, go for it. That's up to you. I think our downsides to that. The only truly really bad decision is when you conform to something that the group didn't even want. Because now you're destroying the very group that you're trying to belong to. It doesn't benefit anybody but fringes that try to manipulate through manufactured consent. So there's a handful of things, right? Some of it's so stupidly obvious. But in liberal societies, we developed over a long

time, the norm of tolerance. Not because you endorse that, but because you know it's way worse. The concept of tolerance came out of the religious wars in Europe where it was like, dude, I think you're evil. I'm going to try to kill you. Well, I can't quite get out of the upper hand. Now you're killing me. My kids are going to kill your kids and we're like, hold on. No one's winning. What if we just said, live and let live? It's okay. We don't have to all agree,

but we can mind our own business. We cannot have to feel like we have to control everyone. So those norms that we're shredding right now are quite important. But the other thing is, I said this earlier, but I think it's worth hitting on. So when they're collective illusions, historically, the bad news is as they become self-fulfilling. The good news is they're pretty fragile because they're lies. And if you pursue the right strategy, you can actually unlock change in a hurry,

but it's not persuasion. So often. So like right now, I'll give an example like under free speech. People are fully convinced. Democrats are fully convinced that other Democrats don't care about it anymore. There's other issues are more important. So even like the ACLU now's one thing that we do. You're like, it was the thing that you do. Like, it was really important thing. Their convinced, but in private, it's just not true. In fact, Democrats have slightly higher commitment

in private than Republicans, but everybody basically still wants that. So say, okay, this is a problem.

So I go tell my more influential center left people. Okay, we got to do something. And then they go out and they'll like, guys, free speech is under attack. It's really important. We got to solve this. That doesn't actually shadow the illusion. It reinforces it. And I think it'd be an example

how not to ever solve this problem. Remember that say no to drugs campaign? Yeah, of course.

It's like the DARE program and just saying, this is your brain on drugs. Yes, okay. So this comes about in the 90s and 2000s because the government had a slight uptick in first time drug use amongst teens. Many pot. Very small bump. They freak out. And they're like, we got to solve this. Nancy Reagan's like, I'm on it. Just say no. Mike drop my spiritual advisor told me. That's right. My straw just told me to just say no. Just say no. We're done here, folks. You're welcome.

So the best ad agencies in the country. They spent a billion dollars trying to get kids to just

scare them straight from a marketing standpoint. It was amazing. The typical American teen saw three ads a day for six years. The problem was the whole premise for this was that the reason kids were trying drugs is they were curious about drugs. But even back then, private opinion data existed that showed that wasn't true. Kids were kind of skeptical, but they were under this massive illusion. They thought that most American kids did drugs. Yeah, I can believe that, dude. The

irrelevant old white guy frying eggs. This is your brain on drugs. Any question? And then you're like, you talked to your doctor and you go, so is my brain frying? And he's like, no, that's actually complete bullshit. And you're like, well, wait a minute. This is dumb movie called walk hard with this guy committing any walks in. And there's two people smoking pot. And he's like, oh my gosh, should I try that? And he they're like, no, and he's like, I wouldn't want to get addicted to it. And they're

like, it's not addictive. And then I don't know, man, I wouldn't want to go crazy and hurt someone and they're like, oh, no, it doesn't really do that. It's not that kind of drug. I don't know. It's seems like it's got to be really expensive. It's cheap as drug there is. And the guy's like,

What the hell?

right? So into the illusion you blitz him with a billion dollars of ad. It's trying to skirmish

straight. What the kids took from the ads was this must be what we're doing. Why would adults tries to argue this to stop? No kidding. That campaign caused an increase in drug use. So you don't do that. But what's nice is under illusions, the way you deal with it is just social proof. And so it's basically, I got to hear it from people like me. So talk to your neighbor here from people like admire or cultural artifacts. So I'll give you an example. We've done some work on this

with Hollywood showrunners and stuff where I'm like, I'll give you the private truth about what

people believe where there's illusions. And if you want to tell a better story, so in the success

research, for example, oh, everybody wants to be famous and rich. So do you remember modern family? Yeah. So season 10, episode 13, they wrote a whole episode. Cam is an acting vice principal has to put on a play. That is, show the illusion reveal the truth. And because if I like modern family, which I did, you have this parasocial relationship with it. And your brain treats members of the characters as part of your in group. So if I hear it said in these shows or movies,

it has an outsized effect on what I believe that we believe. So there's ways to deal with

this, but ultimately, it's a whack-a-mo game unless people start to internalize the

you're being manipulated. And here's the things that you need to do, right, to be able to not let that effect your life. You should support our sponsors. Everybody's doing it. Well, except for those people, and we don't want to be like them now, do we? We'll be right back. This episode is sponsored and part-by-quince. I simplify what I wear today because figuring out an outfit is one more piece of mental load that I don't need. There's a reason Steve Jobs had a uniform. Fewer decisions,

more brain power for things that actually matter. That's why Quince has been my go-to. I just want

quality, comfortable pieces that look good, fit well, don't cost a fortune. I also like stuff that looks clean and timeless. Quince really nails that. Their fabrics feel elevated. The fits are easy. Everything just works without needing to overthink it. They've got great spring staples, like 100% European, linen shirts, shorts from $34 soft pima cotton teas, pants that are relaxed and comfortable, but still polish enough to wear almost anywhere. Gen's a huge fan,

as well. She gets everything from jewelry to luggage from Quince because it has that same clean quality feel without the crazy markup, and because Quince works directly with ethical factories and cuts out the middleman, everything is price 50 to 80% less than what you find at similar brands. So you're getting premium materials without the ridiculous markup. Refresher every day with luxury, you'll actually use head to quince.com/jordan for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns.

Now available in Canada too. That's quai and ce.com/jordan for free shipping and 365 day returns. Quince.com/jordan. This episode is sponsored and part by AT&T. You know why I love summer? All those plans we made, they finally make it out of the group chat. It seems like there's more time to fit everybody in. Whatever you've gotten store this summer, capturing those memories is a must.

That's why I love the iPhone 17 Pro I picked up from AT&T. It's center stage front camera

auto adjust the frame to fit everyone into group selfies. You don't even have to turn your phone. No awkward cropping or asking strangers to take it just the perfect group selfie every time. And AT&T makes sharing those moments with everybody easy because you got to share the pic or it didn't happen right? Right now at AT&T ask how you can get iPhone 17 Pro on them with eligible iPhone trading any condition requires trading of iPhone 15 plus or higher excluding iPhone 16e

and 17e requires eligible plan. Terms are restrictions apply, subject to change, visit ATT.com/iPhone or visit an AT&T store for details. If you like this episode of the show, I invite you to do

what other smart and consider it listeners do which is take a moment and support our amazing

sponsors. They make the show possible. All of the deals discount codes and ways to support the podcast or searchable and clickable on the website at jordanharbinger.com/deals. If you can't remember the name of a sponsor, you can't find the code. Email us, somebody here will get you a jordan that jordanharbinger.com. We're happy to dig up codes for you. It is that important that you support those who support the show. Now, back to Todd Rose. Keeping kids off drugs campaign

thing, now that you say it caused an uptick in drugs, it makes perfect sense and it's almost funny except for the results we're disaster. There was one worth this guy's like he finds his kids weed in a cigar box or something and he goes, where did you learn how to do this and the kid goes to you all right? And I remember thinking, dude, people's parents are doing this too. Am I the only kid? It doesn't smoke pot? I had that exact experience. I learned it by watching you. I'm like,

oh, I didn't realize reasonable adults smoke pot. This guy looks functionally. He came home from work. He's got a job. Yeah. He's got pants on. Yeah. Because it's like the exact opposite of whatever they thought they were doing. But history is littered with counter examples where under illusions if you use social proof, including again, we all get to be part of that. A little more authenticity without putting your whole job at risk goes a long way in shattering illusions in your groups.

Marriage equality is a phenomenal example.

activists and academics met in I think of Chicago. I was like, listen, do not try for marriage. The public's not ready for it. It'll backfire private opinion. Actually, at a slim majority, it was the love of love crowd and libertarians who were like, I don't care. But they all thought that people in their churches, people at their work, oh, they care. So there's an illusion. They were smart enough to realize this persuasion. This trying to convince people to change their

minds doesn't work because it reminds them, oh, everybody else must not really agree with this. Because you're not going to my door trying to convince me to change my mind. I kind of already agree with you. So a bunch of them peeled off and went to Hollywood and started just telling stories, will and grace as a infamous one, even modern family, right? And it's not just put it in the background. And it's the fastest change in public opinion ever recorded.

It went to 70% approval in the span of like 14 years. And that sort of exponential change in public meaning doesn't happen if people privately don't agree with it. It's a floodgate opening of people

going, oh, I can express that this is the least important thing in my life now, or that I totally

find with it. And yeah, that's really interesting. Right. You can do that. These other places where it's like countries have been transformed. I mean, my book I wrote about the Velvet Revolution in Czechoslovakia was anchored in this. Just real quick on that, because I still think it's like something more people should know. It's the only time where the authoritarian communist government

was overthrown without anybody dying. And it was like, what was amazing is the guy that did it

was vost of hovel? Wasn't a politician at the time? Wasn't a military guy? He was a poet and a playwright. Like, he had written this satire of communism called the Garden Party. And it was so subtle. Like, even the sensors didn't know they were being made fun of. I see. Wow. But he sat and watched it. And it became like literally the Hamilton of its time runaway sold out every night. He said, I watched the audience every night, not the play. He said, they laughed at all the right parts.

They laughed at things you wouldn't find funny if you really believed in communism.

And so he realizes that the problem wasn't that everyone believed. It's that they all thought they

believed. And he wrote this phenomenal manifesto called the power of the powerless, which you can get for free, you download. It's like worth reading where he realizes the problems in illusion. And he's like, well, if that's the case, then there's only one way out of this, right? Is that people have to find that responsibility to live in truth again, because we're so used to living in the lie. And they went about these called them small works. They were non-political. They literally like,

would have like a literary club. So people could start to write poetry a little bit more authentically. And people made fun of him. Like they were like, you're so naive. Like they have all the guns. You're going to overcome this with authenticity and personal responsibility. But it happens so fast that like literally no one saw coming. The KGB missed the developer revolution, the CIA missed it. Even hobble just before the revolution, the 12 days that over

through the government. He was on an international radio doing an interview. And he said, you're trying to rally the troops. And he was like, look, revolutions take a long time, stick with it. I probably want to be alive to see the end of it. But I'm committed to it. Three months later, he was the first democratic elected president of a free chuckle. So crazy. That's wild.

That's incredible. I did not know that story. It was an exchange student in the former Eastern

Germany. And I remember asking how many people were like really communist. My host father was like, I don't

know, we didn't exactly have data on who totally didn't believe in the system. But there are a lot of people died driving into the other country or going over a minefield or trying to get over the Berlin wall or trying to sneak out on a train. And they dedicated a lot of resources to not letting us do that. You know, a lot. Landmines machine gun deaths. There's a listener of the show. She'll write me after this. She told me that she was a kid and she had family in his Germany. And every time

they would go to East Germany on the train and come back, the border police would pull her aside because she was a kid and go, where are you really from? And they would ask her to say things and try and see if her dialect would slip into an East German dialect because it's slightly different.

And she wasn't East German. So today always let her out. But she's like, I remember every time

they would pull me aside away from my parents and ask me different questions, where are you really from? How do you say this? Where read the sentence for me to see if she would slip into an East German dialect? You don't dedicate that kind of resources when you have a bunch of true believers and it doesn't matter. It's not a thing. You wouldn't have to worry about this. Are the guns trying to keep you in or like the dead give away? Exactly. Then when the wall fell, my host

father told me. He's like, pretty much everyone who could went there. I mean, you had people riding on the top of cars because most people didn't have a car and then you'd fill the car with your neighbors and then somebody would get in the trunk and another person's like drive slowly and all hold on to the top of the car because I want to go and there's an old documentary footage with border guards like, I'm not going. There's nothing for me over there as people are just

dreaming to pass them. And there's a German joke that says the old president at the time is name is Eric Hanakari. He was like the president or whatever you'd call out of East Germany.

The joke is, hey man, don't forget to turn off the light because the last per...

turns out the light in Germany. So they're like, hey Eric, don't forget to turn off the light.

If you want to go there, you can. All right. Don't forget to turn off the lights, buddy.

Everybody's out of here. I love it. Again, this is that scale where like repressive regimes have understood the need to control that narrative and manufacture the illusion because that's the best way to keep people in check. There's not for nothing regardless what you think about the war. There's a reason to run turned off the internet for the last 45 days. The last thing that they want is for everyday people to be able to say anything about because it would be the end for them.

We look at that. We take, oh, wow, these governments do this. Okay, but now come back into our lives and realize that the same kind of manipulation is being directed towards us in more small ways around our identity groups and around it. It's all happening online and part of it's just

realizing we're not special. It's happening to me too. I wrote a book on it and I guarantee you,

I fall for the same stuff. It's everywhere right now. It seemed, you mentioned earlier, we're wired for this. So why are we wired for this? Obviously, something to do with social cohesion and things like that. I wonder, is there any sort of FMLRI experiment that shows like, hey, when I conform to the group, I get a dopamine hit or something along those lines. Some of my favorite studies on this. Yeah. So we've been wired to be with groups not against them.

We just were not a long wolf species and that makes tons of sense from a survival standpoint that you would just be like, there's an old saying better wrong together than right alone. Just like you're going to survive. Being the dude that's like, you guys are all wrong. I'm like, well, good luck to you. Yes, had fun out there. One of my favorite studies that a colleague

of mine did in the Netherlands. He was like, yeah, conformity, like a lot of the conformity studies we do

are so artificial that you're like, yeah, does anybody really have that experience? It's like the classic like ash line experiment where we put in this room and judge links of lines. You're like, no one's doing that though. So he was like, let me pick the most subjective thing I could imagine. And it was like, it's who you think is good looking. That is such a personal thing, okay? He's like, I wonder if conformity goes that far. So he did this super clever FMRI study.

So he brings people in and he's like, we're just doing this study rating faces. It's just like hot or not. And he's going to give you like a couple hundred faces and you ran a scale of one to five. How attractive they are with five being the hottest. So you're doing this in the scanner and then so a picture comes up, I'm like, oh, five. As soon as I give it a score, instantly above my score, it shows you what the average was for everyone who's done the study before you. So this is a group.

You don't know is not even that important of a group. But what was super clever is they have you do

all that and at the very end they're like, oh, shoot. It didn't record your scores. I'm really sorry, if we pay a little more, would you just quickly do the, and they don't show the group scores and we're just quickly have you reread them. So when you're in your brain, when you are told that you're five, oh, it's a five to him. By the way, the group did it was all bullshit. Completely made up. There was no other group. Half the time, the group agrees with you. The other half, it doesn't in a

far away. And then it kind of a little bit in between. When the group confirms, oh, you said five, the group says five, it triggers a dopamine reward response. The same brain area is that hard drugs activate. Just saying like, do more of this. This is awesome. When you are told you're against your group, it triggers what's called an error signal. There's these very special neurons called spindle neurons that cascade electrical signal all across your brain. They disrupt everything else. Memory,

attention, say something's wrong, start paying attention. It's that hard wired, right? Not surprisingly when we've given the test again, almost everyone moved their scores out of trackness to be closer the group and they had no idea they did it. They swore. They hadn't changed anything and they randomized them. They didn't even really know. You saw a couple hundred of them. But it's just, oh, shit, I'm way far away from my group. On who you think is attractive, such a personal choice.

But how did they know who to shift their rating on if they didn't have the ratings from the group in front of them? They're brain remembered. So if that instant where I rate this face, I'm like five and the group says one, that error signal instantly. And so what happens is you get this instant, almost like flash bulb kind of members like, what is going on in my environment right now, something is off. It's not even like conscious. You're not even aware of it. It's just,

it's evolved for survival. But then you pair that with. So how do you judge what your group thinks?

You're like the loudest voices repeated the most. Right. The most extreme loudest person who's willing to constantly braid everyone. It reminds me of those experiments. They have a bunch of confederates and then there's one person who's the test subject and it's like, okay, which circle is bigger and everyone's like pointing to the small one. If you think it's a small, the raise and then the person who's win a minute that's clearly the smallest, not the biggest. They're looking

around and their hand looks slowly goes like, oh, I guess I am wrong and it's like they're just

They won't even believe their own eyes at that point.

Solomon Ash was the first guy to do them in like the 50s and they were obsessed about what

happened in World War II. Like how could so many people commit atrocities? Like they're not all evil of people. So what led them that? So he showed that exact studies where it's like, they'll literally just lie. The objective truth, the different circle sizes. It wasn't hard. There's an obviously a right answer, right? They're all saying the wrong answer and you go with it. What was wild though is afterwards in those studies Ash would interview them and be like, okay, all right, all right,

you could mess up now. That wasn't true. And like about half of them would be like, yeah, but I didn't want to, what was the point? Why am I going to stand out? A subset of them swore up and down that they actually saw what the group told them to see? Really. So they're brain just changed the visual. So he was like, Ash, like, that's not true. They're lying. A colleague of mine in Georgia actually said, well, wait, we have FMR right now. So he re-did the entire study

and found that for a subset of people who'd conformed, it changed in their visual areas of their brain. What it was they were seeing. We are so wired for this. And again, if that were

really true, that's what your group wants out of you. There may be some trade-off where you're like,

am I really going to stand on my own like, I like X, but your whole group likes Y? Is that matter? Maybe I want to be with the group. But collective illusions are, it's a lie. The group doesn't even believe this. So you're conforming to it is actually literally changing the group, right? And you destroy the group that you actually want to be part of. Is this how bad social norms or corrupted social norms develop and come into it? Because people think because of social norms exists that

everybody agrees with that. I'm thinking primarily, I guess racism, for example. So there's so many people that grow up in a racist environment. And this is an embarrassing example, I think I might get in trouble for this. But my dad's family, half the family, kind of racist, Michigan in the 50s and 60s and 70s. It was just like a little bit racist. And it's weird, right? Because they're like teachers and Detroit public schools. But they save racist stuff all the time. But my dad is not

at all. And he was very much, hey, we don't talk like that at all. And I'm like, but Uncle Bobby, Uncle Steve, and he's like, my mom is like, don't listen to anything. These people say, because they are racist. And it's bizarre because they had the same upbringing. They grew up in the same house. They went to the same schools, everything. I am almost convinced that they don't

really necessarily believe this. Like, how are you a teacher in a Detroit public school?

We're almost all the students are black. And then you make all these really inappropriate horrifying jokes and family parties. What is true? You care about your students. So what

is you've dedicated your life to these people? What the hell is exactly right? So first of all,

you did a good job. You won't get trouble with your family. Because you said half. So everybody there can be like, why was not the racist half? Everybody goes, oh, it's not me. It's not me. Yeah, it's Uncle Steve. Well done. So you're exactly right. So there's actually some really good private opinion research on this during integration in the south. So a guy named Orgorman did this research where he found that white southerners privately were done with like segregation.

They were like, this doesn't make any sense. I don't really want this. But they were so commits because of the norms that this is definitely what everybody else believes and they're faced with, do I stand on principle? But lose my group like my actual community. And so most of them literally upheld and fought against desegregation, even though they were privately for it. And people

go, that can't be true. No listen. Again, people want to belong at such a powerful force. Right?

So at risk of losing your community, others go along with this. Those norms, they just stick around. They're so hard to get rid of. I'll tell you another one that we know for sure right now is female general mediation in Egypt. Yeah. What a horrific norm. We know as a matter of fact, over 90% of adults in Egypt do not want that parents don't want to hurt their little girl. That's interesting. I'm doing a show about this right now. Actually, it's funny. Good timing.

But you think about how that works, right? They're still convinced that most other people are okay with it. In that culture, that norm has consequences. If you don't do this, she is unmarried

like what 10 years later. And if that's your retirement, basically, you're playing a dangerous

game. You're like, I'm pretty sure everyone believes this. I don't want to do this. But if I don't do it, they're stuck. They're stuck. The whole FGM, female general mediation thing is quite interesting because if you go into this, like my researcher did, she was like, clearly men want to do this because they want to control women. And it turns out in her research, she's like, Jordan, you're not going to believe this. It turns out the people who are tricking young girls into a

basement with a chocolate bar are aunties and grammas. The men, when we surveyed them, where she read research, when they're surveyed, the men are like, I don't care. I think it's kind of gross. They're doing that and they're mutilating her and uncut versus cut. I don't care. I don't

Even believe any of these wives tales.

that makes any sense to me. But grandma really wants to do it. And we're just all going to turn a blind eye while she commits this atrocity in an basement somewhere. And it's crazy because it's the opposite of what you think. You think it's like all these old men are so gross. They're just doing this in a patriarchy. The guys don't care. Yeah, there's like a small subset of religious zealots. But you're right. So we see this in our data too. And some of the explanations for it are

like, a little bit of misery loves company or like, I had this happen to me. So therefore, to suddenly say like, this isn't okay or this is good, it's kind of tough to do that. But it's funny how many of the guys are like, I don't care. We're like, oh, the men are doing it. You're like, hey, if we can't accurately understand what's driving this problem, you have no chance of solving it.

There's a story you probably know this. There was a community I think in someone

sub-Saharan Africa where this was commonplace. And the pastor who was a man suddenly decided, this is really gross and not hygienic. And there's no reason for us to be doing this. And so he went up in church where everybody goes to church is one of those kind of people. And he goes, this is not something that God actually wants us to do. And everyone was like, what? And so every sermon, every Sunday, he was like, by the way, there's nothing in the Bible about this. God does

not care if we do this. This is something you are doing. If you're doing this, you're doing this. God's not telling you to do this. This is on you. And the village was like, oh, okay, I guess we just won't do that anymore. And it's basically like they just stopped. So this is what's important

is these collective illusions that most powerful things are like, okay, the people I admire. He's

a social meaning maker for him to say it. It's like, okay, well, obviously like that. So this is the pastor playing cards and Mrs. Salt's whatever village is the same thing. He just shattered the reality of the collective illusion. We don't need to do this. And everyone was like, oh God, thank God. It's a thank God. And it was nice is then one person just needed the pastor to say it. And they're like, we're done. And then the other person's like, oh, and my neighbor's not doing it. You know what I mean?

And it's sort of snowballs. Like, we all have different thresholds. Like, oh, we have a choice. We have a choice. We don't have to do this to our kid now. Yeah. And what you see in a lot of the research is that it's like, it often just takes one person. So when you do those same, which circle is bigger, if you have one other person, doesn't matter how many other people are lying, one of their

person telling the truth is enough to get the other person. It's like, I'm not alone. So it's like that

initial willingness to be honest about your views. I think people underestimate how profoundly powerful

that is to enabling other people to start being honest too. I have the feeling that Shopify is a platform that can only be obtained. All is super simply integrated and balanced. And the time and the money that I can't be able to invest in there. For all of them, in VaxTomb. Now the cost of those tests of Shopify is point-to-date. It really is a great companion to the show. Jordan Harbinger dot com slash news is where you can find it.

Now for the rest of my conversation with Todd Rose. I've not tried to pat podcasting on the back, but it does do this for certain people. Look, if you're listening to this and you live in New York City or Chicago, most of what I say here is on the show with your guesses. It's interesting enough. You listen to it, obviously, but it's not world-changing. The emails I get from people that live in

countries where they don't necessarily have free media and they don't have a lot of sources because

you would need a satellite dish to get anything that's not state-run. For example, we have a lot of listeners and we have a lot of listeners and random African countries and stuff where they speak English and me and the guests speak clearly enough that they understand what we're saying a lot of the time.

Even if it's their second language, I get emails from these people that are like, "I had no idea.

You didn't have to do what your parents wanted you to do." That was news to me. When I started listening to your podcast, you don't have to have the same religion or you can marry somebody who's not from your area or the same belief system as you, this show is like the first time that idea had ever been communicated to them and that to me is crazy. Ideas like this shows like this and any other podcast for that matter, any other internet media can shatter these collective illusions because

you're the only voice that they have in their head that is not echoing the exact same things as their neighbors and some of these small communities. And what's interesting is these illusions shattered the speed of trust, right? So what's interesting with the podcast space is you've built a very dedicated following, right? So sometimes these fragmented media ecosystems like, yeah, there's no more Oprah anymore. Yeah, that's true. There's not like a person that now that's fine.

But the people that listen to you trust you. Do I mean, and you have a relationship? So when you say

Something, it actually matters in a way that it doesn't at scale with, we sho...

celebrity to say it's no, we're choosing in to listen to you. To your point to is I've thought it wild. The amount of emails that I get from Iran, like I literally just got one last week from a graduate student in Iran who's doing her decision on collective illusions. And she's

huh, I think that maybe I'm like, yeah, maybe don't be too loud right now. Like give it another

month. Yeah. Oh man. You okay? Finish your dissertation in London. How's that sound? Yeah, let's get you a visa to get out of there. You reminded me of something when you mentioned trust, I find it so ironic that China, Iran, Russia and other low trust societies are the ones that are like, we need to make sure people in America don't trust each other and we need to chip away at that trust because when I think of low trust society, I think of post-Soviet countries because when I lived in former Yugoslavia,

I remember talking to people there and they were like, it's not that I don't trust my name. I don't trust anyone. And I was like, really? What's it like growing up and you don't trust anyone? Oh yeah. And my dad's best friend murdered him with an axe and it's like, why? They were both in this intelligent services and like they got drunk and like, I don't know something happened. He murdered my dad with an axe. And I'm like, that doesn't sound like

a random argument like this. And it's like, no, in an East Germany, you would go and look at your

stasi file, which is the state police, like the secret police for people don't know. And they had

counseling on the second floor because you'd go and you'd look at your stasi file to find out

which one of your like student friends was spying on you and you find out it's like your wife and your brother and your dad and they're all reporting on you. And so your faith in all of your closest relationships is immediately destroyed because you've read this file and it's like, there's no trust. For the most part, then you look at like, why post-Soviet satellites, it's said, it's said such a hard time reading because social trust is like a threshold variable

where free societies just don't function below a certain level. The counter example there and I've spent some time there as a stonia, which has done a phenomenal job. They have some of the highest levels of social justice, but it was intentionally cultivated. They were lucky enough that when that iron curtain fell or went up, they had access to the radio through Finland. And so they didn't lose complete and they kept traditions alive, subtle ways to signal to each other,

that they hadn't bought into the stuff. So they've recovered a lot faster. But it worries me here in the US, so we now have the lowest levels of social trust ever recorded the United States. That does not surprise me at all. And this is where collectibles are both a problem and part of the solution, which is the single best predictor of social trust is perceived shared values. If I think you share some of my basic values, I'm inclined just to trust you to tell you proved

me otherwise. So would if we share a lot of female values, but the illusions have led us to believe that we don't. So then we end up losing trust. It like the results, the exact same. So just destroy the trust that we have each other by forming false polarization and driving a resentment

to sky high levels, you can do a lot of damage to a country that you would never have been all

to do with guns. Yeah. So it's not just distrust and institutions. It's distrust and other people. And I would argue that's the trust that matters the most. So when I think of trust and institutions, maybe this is just like semantics, but I think about as confidence through transparency and accountability, I have confidence that this institution will do what it says and isn't going to have too much grip. And so I just trust requires vulnerability, right? Trust requires that

I can't actually know. And that's the kind of stuff you have to have with your fellow citizens

that on the whole, I think most people can be trusted. That small thing, I think about like even in the free market, like if I'm a mom and pop shop and I sell stuff to Walmart and theory, if they don't pay their bills, I could sue them, but not really. Not really. They're going to bury you in paperwork, of course. You have no recourse. None. So there's like even this trust that they will pay their bills, right? That trust erodes like basic free markets don't even work. Yeah.

And so it's like a very clever imagine going to a restaurant, you have to pay up front, even though you're not sure what you're going to get during the meal. That's annoying. And it's like, okay, well, I'm going to go out less and maybe I'll go to the places that's still allowed me to do this. We don't let just anyone in because we get stiff on the bill all the time. You know, I got to do a credit check before you got to dinner. And look at the spiral where rather than

treat crime seriously, look, we can get it underlying causes of it or whatever, but the idea that you're going to excuse crime in some of these cities, and now all said in places where like, I guess we lock up our deodorant now. Yes, you lock up the deodorant. And then I go in and go, it's like ridiculous. You go into like a CVS and you're like, I just want a deodorant, but now I got to find someone to open it. Like you ring the bell. No one shows up. And I'm like, geez, I'm about to steal this.

Just like get out of here and go on with my life. But they're doing it in response to stupid policies

that basically decriminalize theft. And then the signal that sends to everyone in the

community is, there must be a lot of criminals here because these guys are having a lock up everything.

It's certainly not convenient.

spiral and you're like, this is San Francisco man. They had all the shoplifting. You couldn't do anything

about it. So the store would lock everything up. I stopped shopping there because I don't want to spend an hour at CVS getting razor blades waiting for an employee to come unlock it, walk it up to the front. I'm like, for God's sake, this is taking way too long. It's easier for me to just order it on Amazon with everything else than Walgreens closes. And then everyone goes, oh, they're closing the drug stores in this area. It's because they hate poor people or whatever. And it's no, it's because

of these dumb as policies and all of the theft that was done by 0.1% of the people that walk in here.

All you have to do is take care of that. And you know, it's funny the defund the police one is such a

good example too because I spend so much time trying to teach senators and Congress people about this just to help them understand like, if you want to do right by your constituents, you can't just assume the 10 people calling you all the time. But the defund the police is like, in Seattle, San Francisco, for the places, policies were implemented. And let's just give them the benefit out. They thought that's what people wanted. They thought that was obviously, my percentage is

why I get a re-elected. So like, the last time I do as we bunches up that everyone hates, I think people want this. So I get ahead of it. I admit, policies, they were disastrous, not my opinion. They've rolled back all those policies because they were terrible. If we want thing, if the people of Seattle were like, no, we kind of want this. Then you get to live with like your choices. Yeah. It's tragic when it was like no one really wanted it. But we all thought

that's what we wanted. This will happen to my neighborhood in San Francisco. I went there, I visited a friend. I was like, I'll walk you back to the transition and then I did a loop and

I walk back to my place. And I see this dude who broke into a bike garage, which is like a

freestanding thing with like a building with a roll down metal grate. I saw him slide under there and I was like, holy crap. He doesn't see me. So I called 911. They're like, the police are busy right now. Can you wait? And I'm like, sure, I'm just going to stay out of sight. 41 minutes later, they show up with their guns drawn and they're like, he's still there. I'm like, yeah, he's still in like 10 bikes already. He just keeps going. He knows no one's coming. He's piling these things up

and he's going to ride them all back. He's just taking them out. One by one. So they get him out of there. There's like, are you sure it's him? I'm like, there's one guy in there with burglary tools. You're going to find him. It's a tiny one room thing. And they're like, oh, there he is right here. So they drag him out from under the thing and they're like, drop your weapon and your tools. They drag him out. I have to go testify, right? Because I'm the witness. I don't even think he

had bail. He just basically, they let him out and then he never showed up to court. Surprise.

They catch this dumbass J walking because he's a brilliant individual who can't even follow

the most basic of laws when you have a worn out for your rest. They finally get him in there.

And the jury lets him go basically because they just like, oh, we think maybe that this was motivated by racism on part of one of the witnesses and stuff like that. And I was like, you think that I watched this man who is also ambiguously white. I can't even tell, break into a building. And I stood there for 41 minutes because I wanted to frame him for stealing bikes even though they caught him with burglary tools and stolen bikes. And there's video footage of the whole thing.

And then they were like, time served. And I was like, you know what, Jury, you deserve the neighborhood that you live in. When this is your bike and your cars getting broken into, don't shed a tear because this is what you are doing to yourself. And I thought to myself, how many people in that jury room were like, let's show the book at this guy, but then one person was like, this is all systemic racism against this dude. And it's like, all right, let me just get out of here.

And every else is like, yeah, I want to get out of here. Yes. Or I don't want to be called a racist. Yes. That's the irony of all that is the use of those kind of tools to silence people, only works. When we could call everything racism, it only works because people aren't racist. No one in the KKK is like, please don't call me racist. That's a good point. I had not thought about that. You're right. Because if you get that cranky old 1960s guy in there and they're like,

that's racist and he's, yeah, I don't like people who are brown. It's like, oh, well, that weapon didn't work. Yeah. Melvin's not going to vote not guilty. Melvin wants to go home too, but he doesn't care. He wants to put him away. But yeah, so it's so clever. Oh, I actually don't

like racism. So you threatening to label me as that is really quick to silence powerful.

Exactly. Yeah. I'm not a fascist, but I found one of the quickest ways to shut people down who are like, you're basically a Nazi. I'm like, yeah, and they're like, oh crap. That was my kind of ended. That was all I have. That was all I had. I thought you're going to defend yourself. It's no, you want to call me a Nazi for something. That's fine. Now, I'm literally Jewish, but you go off and they're like, well, crap. That's like the mental equivalent of closing the

straight of her moves. Yeah. You played your one card. No, it doesn't work. That was all you had. That's like, yeah. Here we are. I'm just shrugging it off. What are you going to do now? I wonder if this whole trust thing does this fuel populism or is that kind of like, it does. When trust gets below a threshold, we're looking out in the rear of your mirror right now. And especially when there's a lot of uncertainty in the world, instead of think as we the people, right? Part of being

democracy with hundreds of millions of people is it's an imagined community, right? I'm not going to meet most everybody, but feel like we're part of community. When that breaks down, it's resorting to tribes as fast as possible. And so you'll see it in this case. It's political a lot, but they'll just

Keep going smaller and smaller to the group that I feel like I can trust.

cling to that like a life preserver. And that's why you see like right now, it just doesn't matter. If I'm a Republican, it's like, what do we believe? Just tell me what we believe. And you're like, where's you guys the ones that we're about free trade? And you're like, now you're like tariffs. And

you're like, wait, or wasn't the left counterculture or free speech? Isn't like, what?

It just turned out they just wanted people who have greeted with them. Oops. I saw this funny joke the other day where somebody was like railing against Palantir, right? This company that kind of expires on everybody and is like working with all these three letter agencies. And it's owned and part by Peter Teele who is gay. And this person was like railing against them. And their bio had all of this sort of progressive stuff. And it, and this very clever sort of right-wing troll replied,

"I support Queer-owned businesses." And it was like, you couldn't do that when you're going to fight against that. It's sort of you're going to say it. And it was like, yeah, but not like that. No, not Peter Teele. Not like that. It was the other gay owned businesses. The ones I like.

That's amazing though. Yeah, that's the way out of this when people are trying to play this is

you just take it to the absurd. You escalated up. Oh, like, why support Queer-owned businesses? This is doubled down on this or onto your points. Yeah, okay. So. Exactly. Yeah, the virtue of signaling things. I am wondering how we push back on this lack of trust. Can this even be rebuilt? Leave us with something optimistic here because I'd love that.

This is what's really important. Social trust has been in free fall, but most of you

will study it as sociological. So they're like, countries with high trust have good welfare systems. Yeah, yeah. That's a little carp for the horse. Again, the single best predictor of social trust is perceived shared values. This is a huge opportunity that we all have a role to play here. We, I promise you, Americans have unbelievable common ground in the values of matter most. You can get all the data from our website. It's like shocking. They're buried under these

public lies. If you shadow those illusions, the first thing that changes is trust because it's, oh, wait, okay. No, you're on my side. You're one of me. And we all have a role to play. So we'll do our part institutionally. We've got lots of stuff in culture with music and television and trash shadow room. We can do stuff. We have these conversations on your podcast

with your reach. But every day people are by far the most powerful. So we've go back to

marriage equality. Yes, it was the television and stuff. But the real thing that changed it was to come out of the closet campaign where every day people found the courage to tell the people that mattered most to them that they were gay. And when you look at the curve for approval of gay marriage, it looks the exact same just lagging behind like of the curve of, do you know someone who's gay? It happened in my family where it was one thing when it was an abstract question. It's

nothing when it's my brother. Right? And everyone's like, well, it's our brother. We just wanted to be happy. So when you're sitting there right now listening or watching this and you're like, I don't know, I wish this were true, but I don't, first of all, go read the research and look at how many of our predictions have come true. Like, this is not rocket science. We're just not telling the truth. And then realize that you are part of the social proof. You don't need to go light your job on fire,

right? You don't need to take risks like crazy. But have an honest conversation with respect with at least one person that matters to you. And again, it would be like, hey, asshole, I have a big Trump supporter. You can be like, hey, how about that? Or listen, I care so much about you. I want you to know how I feel on this. If you don't feel like you can be honest, there's a close second, which is just inject uncertainty. So people are like, we're all for

Camelow. You're like, yeah, I haven't met at my mind yet. Tell me about that. And it's like, just

introducing the idea that maybe, or I'm not so sure yet, it's amazing how many people will grab

on to that. Oh, I'm not me there. I'm not sure yet either. But I promise you, if you could find that courage, we get out of this. It seems simple. Find the moral courage to be honest with the people that matter to you. Don't be an asshole about it. There's a way to be respectful and let people have their opinions to the second pieces have the civic courage to make it safe for other people. In some ways, that's easier. If I'm sitting here and we're all hanging out and some

super maga persons say something I'm trying to shut them down, and I can be like, look, I don't agree with her. But let's hear out. She has a right to speak. That's pretty safe thing to do, just to create the space for people. Doing stuff like that, you can make a difference in a hurry. Just like the as one person starts being like, "Straw you told, right?" Oh, wait. So the pastor is, so we don't need to mutilate genitals. This is okay, right? It will cascade and you will be

shocked, and I promise you again, underneath these public lies are private truths that are pretty

heartwarming. I think we'll be okay as a country if we can recognize the real nature of the

problem and realize that we have a role to play in solving it. Todd Rose, thank you very much. Let's not wait two and a half years to do the next one. Next time in person. That's right. Thank you so much. We're more connected than ever and somehow more vulnerable than we've ever been.

Cybercrisis author Eric Cole explains how AI-driven attackers corporate-scale...

and aging systems have turned every day tech into an open door. Do you want to be 100% secure?

Do you want your family to be 100% secure? It's easy. Pack up your bags, sell everything,

move to pencil thing and become omish. Because I'll tell you, I hacked a lot of things in my life, I have not been able to hack a candle and a horse and buggy. If you have no functionality or no benefit, you can be 100% secure. And to give you a more realistic example, my smartphone, as soon as you add any functionality, you're decreasing security. Security and functionality are inverse 100% security is zero functionality. What is the value in benefit? What is the risk and

exposure? Is the value worth the risk? If the value of benefit is worth the risk, do it. If the

value in benefit is not worth the risk, don't do it. And the reality is that I always tell people

the most dangerous word on the internet is the F word. And it's not what you're thinking. The F word is free. Free is not free because all the times when you have a free app, you're basically allowing them to access your microphone or your camera or your pictures. If they ask you and you say yes and you give them permission, that's actually an authorized app and it's allowed. And the reality is most people don't even realize when they install these apps, they're hitting yes, yes, yes, yes,

and allowing access. If I want to make my smartphone 100% secure, smash it, burn it, throw it in a ditch,

turn it off and it'll be 100% secure. It's actually freaking scary of how much you're being monitored and tracked with your phones. You don't even realize it. Check out episode 1247 of the Jordan Harbinger Show with Eric Cole. And you'll start looking at your phone, your home, and even the power grid very differently. So yeah, turns out the biggest thing dividing us might not actually be division. It's the fact that we think we're divided. We're guessing what everybody else believes.

They're guessing what we believe. And somehow we all end up stuck in this weird social game where nobody says what they actually think. And the cost of that bad policies broke and trust a whole lot of unnecessary conflict and bad blood as well as vitriol online. But the upside and this is the hopeful part, these illusions are very fragile. They only exist because we keep reinforcing them. So the

moment you question the norm, you say what you actually think, or you just ask, wait, why is that?

You start to break this spell, which is a rare case where just being a little more honest and a little less performative actually makes the world a better place. So maybe we don't fix the entire country today, but maybe we just stop pretending. That's a decent start anyway. All things Todd Rose will be on the website. Advertisers deals discount codes, ways to support the show, also on the website at Jordanharbinger.com/deals. Please consider supporting those who support

the show. Don't forget about six-minute networking as well over at six-minute networking.com. I'm @ Jordanharbinger on Twitter and Instagram. You can also connect with me on LinkedIn. There's not a whole lot of bots there, not yet anyway. This show is created in association with podcast one. My team is Jen Harbinger, Jason Sanderson, Robert Fogody, Tata Sadelaskas, Ian Beard,

Gabriel Masrahi. Remember, we rise by lifting others. The fee for the show is you share it with

friends when you find something useful or interesting. In fact, the greatest compliment you can give us is to share the show with those you care about. If you know somebody who's interested in social science, extremism, or is just wondering why the discourse in this country has actually gone completely to heck in a hand basket, share this episode with them. In a meantime, I hope you apply what you hear on the show so you can live what you learn and we'll see you next time.

Compare and Explore